A Rosetta Stone for Viktor Orbán: Russian

On Hungary’s National Day (March 15), Prime Minister Viktor Orbán gave a speech commemorating the country’s independence in 1848 and reaffirming Hungarian sovereignty. The speech has gained widespread attention beyond the borders of Hungary.

Below is the Russian version of excerpts from Mr. Orbán’s speech. Many thanks to OriFa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

The English-language version is here.

These are the languages that volunteers have signed up for so far:

Albanian English Portuguese †
Catalan French Romanian
Croatian German Russian
Czech Greek Slovenian †
Danish † Italian Spanish †
Dutch * Polish  

(* = assigned but not yet received; † = received but not yet posted)

If you want to translate the speech into another language, please send an email to gatesofvienna (at) chromatism (dot) net, and I’ll send you a handy Word doc with the times and English subtitles in tabular format, which will make it easier.

Russian Transcript:

Continue reading

Gates of Vienna News Feed 3/27/2016

A suicide bomber killed more than 60 people today when he exploded himself in a park in Pakistan. The park was crowded with Christians who had gathered to celebrate Easter.

Some analysts believe the attack was revenge for the invasion of Afghanistan by Pakistani Christians. Others think it is because Pakistani Christian airplanes bombed Muslims in Syria. Still others surmise that it may have been due to resentment over the past colonization of Muslim lands by Pakistani Christians. It’s also possible that Muslims were angry because the ancestors of today’s Pakistani Christians took part in the Crusades — the so-called “Pakis’ Crusade” in the 11th century.

And, yes, nothing in the paragraph above is true. I made it all up. But not the first paragraph; that’s real.

In other news, a pipe bomb exploded in an alleyway in Anaheim, California on the afternoon of Easter Day, punching a hole in a door. No one was injured. This one is also true.

To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.

Thanks to AF, C. Cantoni, Dean, Fjordman, Insubria, JD, KS, LP, MM, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

Continue reading

To Chaos and Beyond — Faye, on Fate and Futurism, Part 3

Below is the second part of Seneca III’s review of the writings of Guillaume Faye. Previously: Part 1, Part 2.

To Chaos and Beyond — Faye, on Fate and Futurism Part 3

by Seneca III

Forward

I have held off posting this concluding review of Faye’s trilogy for seven months. My reticence has been due to the fact that I felt that if I presented it too early, before events predicted by Faye occurred, and occurred closely within his predicted time frame, it would fall upon barren ground and be assigned to either or both of the categories ‘wishful thinking’ and ‘interesting fiction at best’.

It is also important to note that ‘Archeofuturism’ was first published, in French, in 1998, ‘Why we Fight’ in 2001 and ‘Convergence of Catastrophes’ in 2004. However I chose to present this series of reviews in a different order — Why we Fight, Convergence of Catastrophes and Archeofuturism — for two reasons: Firstly, ‘Why we Fight’ and ‘Convergence of Catastrophes’ both detail, elaborate and expand upon the underlying concepts of his general thesis (THE CLASH OF CIVILISATIONS, ETHNIC INVASION, CATASTROPHE THEORY, GIANT ECONOMIC CRISIS etc., etc.) as they are introduced and briefly explored in the first part of ‘Archeofuturism’, and it would be pointless to re-iterate them.

Secondly, the final quarter of ‘Archeofuturism’ is a 21,000 word novella in which a hypothetical functionary of the ‘Eurosiberian Federation’ describes a vacuum-tube train journey across the European Continent from Brest on the Atlantic coast to his hometown on the shores of the Bering Strait. He shares part of this journey with a young Indian woman visitor who asks why and how the breakdown of the old, Western European order began and progressed and eventually became the Federation, and it is here that Professor Faye’s uncanny prescience — or profound depth of scholarship, I know not which — surfaces, and it is that which I shall focus upon in Part 3.

In the novella the dates of certain seminal events proposed by the narrator (Oblomov) are variable only by a year, or two at most, from the dates of recent and current events, and this is telling because in reality they were predicted by Faye eighteen years ago and many have eventuated over the course of the last six months; others are so obviously on our near horizon or can easily be extrapolated from our present circumstance.

Consequently this final review is a series of loosely connected (and abridged) abstracts from those passages in the novella that describe the lead up to the Great Catastrophe and its aftermath, and then later detail the Functionary’s answers to the young woman’s questions. Those dates and descriptions therein which match, or closely match, recent and unfolding events are emboldened so that you the reader can more easily identify and compare them with the reality you find about you, and thus come to your own conclusions.

[N.B.: Interlocutions below and in square brackets are mine. S III.]

“Archeofuturism [the concept] is thus both archaic and futuristic, for it validates the primordiality of Homer’s epic values in the same breath that it advances the most daring of contemporary science…

…Faye’s Archeofuturism holds out an understanding of this world collapsing about us, imbuing European peoples with a strategy to think through the coming storms and get to the other side — to that post catastrophic age, where a new cycle of being awaits them, as they return to the spirit that lies not in the past per se, but in advance of what is to come.”

— Michael O’Meara, Saint Ignatius of Loyola Day, 2010.

A DAY IN THE LIFE OF DIMITRI LEONIDOVITCH OBLOMOV

A Chronicle of Archeofuturist Times

Abstracts

Brest, 22 June 2073

The Brest-Moscow-Komsomolsk bullet train left at 8:17 AM. The Plenipotentiary Councillor of the Eurosiberian Federation, Dimitri Leonidovich Oblomov, was running late. He hadn’t slept much and had woken at the last minute with a furry tongue. The business meeting with the Ministry of the Navy of the autonomous state of Brittany had gone on until 2:00 AM, so long had it taken Dimitri to get those Celts — stubborn as mules — to reach an agreement…

…On the whole the planetrain journey from the Atlantic coast to the Pacific took three hours. Following the traumatic occurrence of the great Catastrophe of 2014-2016, the Renaissance of 2030 and the building of the Eurosiberian Federation, which was given the name of ‘Empire of the Two-Headed Eagle — for it marked the fusion between the [remnants of the] European Union and Russia with the Pact of Prague in 2038 — the revolutionary Federal Government had chosen to make a clean break from the ideas of the past in the field of transport, as in all other fields…

Brest-Berlin

The screen in front of Dimitri displayed the speed of the underground train: 1,670 kilometers per hour. On a simple map a luminous dot indicated its position: ten minutes away from Paris Montparnasse. Paris…A city that must have been magnificent in the Twentieth century, Dimitri thought. He had few memories of it. He was only ten in 2016 when his family had fled the city plagued by anarchy and hunger to return to Russia. Most of the monuments had been burnt and destroyed, and its museums and treasures pillaged during the civil war that had broken out before the Great Catastrophe…

Berlin-Warsaw-Kiev

Continue reading

Proposed Tennessee School Voucher Program: Teaching Kids to Hate Infidels

Below is the latest newsletter from the Tennessee Council for Political Justice.

Newsletter #195 State Funded School Vouchers Support Teaching Hate for Kaffirs

For the past three years, Governor Haslam and the rest of the establishment leadership have been trying to pass the “Tennessee Choice & Opportunity Scholarship Act.” The bill provides public money known as vouchers that families can use to pay for private school education.

Students at religious schools are heavy consumers of this public financing in states with school voucher laws.

The Beacon Center, the Tennessee chapter of American Federation for Children, Students First and Americans for Prosperity are some of the privately funded organizations that have lobbied hard to get the school voucher bill passed.

For the third time the legislature has not passed this bill. So, it seems the will of the people is not to use their tax dollars to send children to private schools. Maybe there’s a good reason.

Before Tennessee tries to pass this bill again, it should look at what happened the year after North Carolina passed its school voucher law. In 2014, North Carolina’s Greensboro Islamic Academy (GIA) was the largest consumer of publicly funded school vouchers having received 43 voucher applications.

The following year GIA’s voucher applications quadrupled to 170.

Islamic schools in Tennessee would qualify for school vouchers

Had the school voucher bill passed in Tennessee, Anoor Academy (Knoxville), Pleasant View School (Memphis) and Nashville International Academy (Nashville), would have been eligible to receive voucher money. All three are private Islamic schools. All three are accredited by AdvancED, a regional accrediting organization. Once they are accredited these schools get classified as “Category III” under the Tennessee State Board of Education rules. Category III schools were eligible for vouchers under the proposed school voucher bill.

In 2013, Anoor Academy’s promo video showed a row of the textbook What Islam Is All About. This book denigrates Jews and Christians and teaches that the warlord Muhammad is the perfect example to follow. It also states that “there is no separation of Masjid and state,” that “Muslims dream of establishing the power of Islam in the world,” and that living under sharia law is the preferred state for all humankind.

Children in this private school read the following in this textbook:

p. 382 — “…historians of the world recognize that Islamic civilization has been the most tolerant and fair out of all the world’s civilizations.”

p. 188 — “Prophet Ibrahim called all people to Allah’s way of life. The ‘Jews’ don’t call anybody to anything. They subscribe to a belief in racial superiority calling themselves the ‘chosen’ ones and excluding non-Jews as much as possible. Their religion even teaches them to call down curses upon the worship places of non-Jews whenever they pass by them! They arrogantly refer to anyone who is not Jewish as ‘Gentiles,’ equating them with sin.”

“Prophet Ibrahim told people to do good and he forbade the wrong. Many ‘religious’ and ‘non-religious’ Jews and Christians lead such decadent and immoral lives that lying, alcohol, nudity, pornography, racism, foul language, pre-marital sex, homosexuality and everything else are accepted in their society, churches and synagogues. Just turn on the television in any Jewish or Christian community and see what’s ‘normal.’”

Because Pleasant Valley School (PVS) is a private school, there is no way to verify whether they are using the same textbook. That aside, however, educational leadership recruited by the school, all have deep Muslim Brotherhood roots.

In 2010 PVS announced on its website that Dr. Hamed Ghazali had been hired as “the new consultant for PVS’ Islamic Studies, Quran & Arabic.” Dr. Ghazali serves as Chairman of the Muslim American Society (MAS) Council of Islamic Schools (MASCIS), recognized as Muslim Brotherhood affiliates.

In 2004 MAS’ Secretary-General admitted in court, under oath, that MAS was founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood. MAS’ own archived website details its associations with the Muslim Students Association, ISNA and NAIT — all named organizations in the Brotherhood’s Explanatory Memo.

On page 12 of the Explanatory Memo it states:

Continue reading

David Wood on the Brussels Terrorists: Striving in the Way of Allah as Commanded by the Koran

In the following video, Dr. David Wood of Acts 17 Apologetics lays out the Koranic basis for last weeks Islamic terror attacks in Brussels, and explains what Muslim organizations and their leftist apologists will do to keep the public from understanding these facts:

What Happens After We Finally Call it a War?

Nicolaus Fest is a German lawyer and freelance journalist. The following op-ed was published on his website. JLH, who translated the piece for Gates of Vienna, includes this note:

On his webpage, the author makes a short note of something he found on the internet: “Of all the varieties of Islam, the most common one seems to be the one that has nothing to do with Islam.”

The translated essay:

Brussels — What to Do?

By Nicolaus Fest
March 24, 2016

Let us begin with a bit of irreverence: Brussels is boring — at least its reactions. They have the effect of Groundhog Day — an infinite loop of sameness. Facebookers background their profile photos with the flag of the stricken land. The “je suis” proclamation is made. The Brandenburg Gate, the Empire State Building and the Eiffel Tower light up in the appropriate national colors, and some cartoon character somewhere is weeping about the assaulted city — this time it’s Tintin. Editorials and statements are just as predictable: Absolute security is impossible; This was an attack on the open society; Fanatics do not speak for Islam; In a globalized world we must become accustomed to global terrorism. And naturally there is no dearth of warnings that we must not “politically misuse” the attacks — must stay calm. As if dozens of dead were no reason to get excited. In contrast to the superficial speeches about solidarity, in fact, such advice reveals more than anything else a lack of solidarity and empathy. What some may call a “cool head” is actually the “cold heart” of a land that has thus far been spared these attacks.

Yet this “cool” which masquerades as civilization, just like the ritualization of acquiescence, is nothing but a sign of weakness. All the formulas of conciliation are in essence variations on self-abnegation. Do not act. Despite repeated new attacks, do not mention the enemy by name. No, instead, entrench yourself behind the “now more than ever” avowals to “keep on keeping on”, which will usually last until the cancellation of the next international soccer match. It’s how to gloss over political inactivity. “Keeping on” is not an option.

The attacks will not stop, and they will reach Germany. They will become more ferocious. So the question arises: How long does the West intend to do nothing about those who are attacking it over and over again? Is Germany expected to accept 500 dead per year as the price of tolerance and the welcoming culture? Or 5,000, or ten times that many victims?

And thus the commentaries reveal a strange contradiction. All the leaders and commentators in the Western world are unanimous: The attacks in Brussels, like those in New York, London, Madrid, Paris, Copenhagen, etc., are “declarations of war against the West”. And yet the dominant advice is still to stay calm? This situation is not devoid of humor. Until recently, at least, declarations of war marked an end of equanimity. Even the stoic English did not go to their five o’clock tea, when Hitler forced them into war. Whoever says “declaration of war” also says: From this moment on, life will be different; from this moment on, this is a different country!

What else, besides a “declaration of war”, besides the use of military materiel against civilians, must happen, before the political system protects us? Do we really need an attack with nuclear or chemical materials to recognize the threat? Must the Petersdom (cathedral) be lying in ash and rubble, must the works of Dürer, van Gogh or Michelangelo be destroyed for the West to wake up? Anyone who just points at the rule of law is not prepared to learn anything from the attacks. Certainly the constitutional state is a fundamental of the West — but this is about the constitutional state at war. That makes a difference.

Continue reading

From Journalism to Jihad in One Easy Lesson

A few days after last week’s terror attacks in Brussels it emerged that one of the three suspects caught on camera at the airport — “the man in the white coat” or “the man in the hat” — was named Fayçal Cheffou. Unlike his companions, who detonated their devices and died in the blast, Mr. Cheffou fled the scene and was arrested later.

Fayçal Cheffou is said to be a former freelance journalist who became a mujahid. However, as far as anyone can tell, his sole journalistic contribution is the video report below from 2014, in which he laments the cruel, sadistic treatment of Muslim inmates at an immigrant detention center during the month of their Ramadan fast.

Many thanks to Oz-Rita for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Below is a report from The Independent describing Mr. Cheffou’s part in last Tuesday’s massacre and his previous career, such as it was:

Faycal Cheffou: Who is the ‘freelance journalist’ charged with terrorist murders after Isis Brussels attacks?

A man who once claimed to be a freelance journalist has been charged with “terrorist murders” following the Brussels attacks.

There is growing speculation that Fayçal Cheffou could be the fugitive “man in the hat” seen with the two airport bombers on CCTV but prosecutors have not confirmed his exact role.

A statement on Saturday said that he had been charged with “participation in the activities of a terrorist group, terrorist murders and attempted terrorist murders” in connection with the explosions at Brussels Airport and Maelbeek Metro station.

Belgian media report that Mr Cheffou is the man pictured wearing a distinctive white coat and hat alongside suicide bombers Najim Laachraoui and Brahim el-Bakraoui in the departures terminal on Tuesday morning.

The suspected Isis militants died when they detonated the suitcase bombs they were wheeling on luggage trolleys but the third and most powerful device, believed to be the third man’s, was found unexploded after he fled the scene.

Little over an hour later, Khalid el-Bakraoui blew himself up at Maelbeek Metro station.

A taxi driver who drove the trio to the airport identified Cheffou as one of his passengers from photographs, Belgian newspaper Le Soir reported, but prosecutors have not confirmed the claim.

Continue reading

Ingrid Carlqvist in Helsinki: The Deliberate Deconstruction of Sweden Through Muslim Immigration

A week ago Ingrid Carlqvist of Dispatch International was invited to speak in Helsinki. In her talk she described the transformation of Sweden from a successful, prosperous, homogeneous nation into a crime-ridden multicultural nightmare. Thanks to the continuing mass immigration of hostile Muslims, Sweden is rapidly on its way to being a third-world failed state:

Gates of Vienna News Feed 3/26/2016

A Muslim shopkeeper in Glasgow was stabbed to death by a fellow Muslim after he wished his Christian neighbors a happy Easter. A man has been charged with the killing, and police say it was a religiously-motivated crime.

In other Glaswegian news, the imam of the largest mosque in Scotland is being investigated by police after he publicly praised the killer of a Pakistani judge who opposed the country’s strict blasphemy law.

To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.

Thanks to AF, C. Cantoni, Caroline Glick, Dean, Insubria, JD, Nick, Srdja Trifkovic, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

Continue reading

A Rosetta Stone for Viktor Orbán: Polish

On March 15, 2016, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán gave an important and inspirational speech on Hungary’s National Day commemorating the country’s independence in 1848.

Below is the Polish version of excerpts from Mr. Orbán’s speech. Many thanks to Green Infidel for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Note: The translator consulted the translations already posted by niezalezna.pl and jeznach.neon24.pl for help with his version of the speech.

The English-language version is here.

These are the languages that volunteers have signed up for so far:

Albanian English Portuguese †
Catalan French Romanian
Croatian German Russian †
Czech Greek Slovenian *
Danish † Italian Spanish †
Dutch * Polish  

(* = assigned but not yet received; † = received but not yet posted)

If you want to add yours to the list, please send an email to gatesofvienna (at) chromatism (dot) net, and I’ll send you a handy Word doc with the times and English subtitles in tabular format, which will make the job easier.

Polish Transcript:

Continue reading

Tatjana Festerling on the Soros-Brokered Migration Deal Between Europe and Turkey

Tatjana Festerling gave this magnificent speech at the PEGIDA rally in Dresden last Monday, the night before the Brussels massacres. Her talk zeroes in on the NWO brokers — especially George Soros — who arranged the deal between Europe and Turkey on the migration crisis, a “solution” championed by Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Rembrandt Clancy has translated and subtitled the speech, and includes an informative introduction as well as a transcript.

“How can it be that one man is training this Chancellor in a refugee course; that this average woman is making irreversible decisions on her own, which annihilate a people and a culture; and no parliament is consulted, no ballot and no discussion about it takes place?”

Introduction
by Rembrandt Clancy

On Monday, the 21st of March 2016 Tatjana Festerling delivered a speech at the weekly demonstration in Dresden.

Her main theme was the extra-parliamentary influences on Chancellor Angela Merkel in the context of mass Islamic migration into Europe. In particular, Frau Festerling draws attention to George Soros’ Project Syndicate (26 September 2015), a six-point “comprehensive plan” or manifesto for managing an annual influx of “at least a million asylum-seekers” into Europe for the “foreseeable future”. The scheme calls for putting into place a highly centralised administration for the management of what amounts to the thinning out of the native European ethnic populations — if that is not putting it too mildly.

The connection between the “comprehensive plan” and its praxis, or between Soros and Angela Merkel, is a little known figure, Gerald Knaus, director of the European Stability Initiative (ESI), a Soros-funded think tank (cf. for example, Open Society under “Current supporters” on the ESI website). Frau Festerling quotes Knaus directly in an interview he gave to Die Welt on 16 March 2016, wherein the ESI director appears recklessly candid, and even boastful about his influence on the politicians. But the newspaper itself states directly that

Gerald Knaus of the think tank ESI worked out the blueprint for Merkel’s asylum policy: close co-operation with Turkey and refugee quotas.

The European Stability Initiative brought this “blueprint” to completion on 4 October 2015 in a draft proposal called The Merkel Plan: restoring control; retaining compassion. Its core points also serve as a background to Tatjana Festerling’s speech:

  • Over the next 12 months Germany officially offers asylum to 500,000 Syrian refugees who are registered in Turkish camps and will transport them to Germany.
  • In return, Turkey will accept or take back all refugees who reach Greece via the Aegean.
  • Germany will compensate the Turkish concession by financial assistance and political support in the attainment of EU visa exemption in 2016.

It is interesting to compare the above “Merkel plan” with the actual negotiated results, at least as they are presented to the public by the European politicians who negotiated it: EU-Turkey statement, 18 March 2016.

Frau Festerling draws attention to a “day of action” to take place in Germany on 4 April. This is the date when migrants who have crossed the Aegean to enter Greece illegally will be sent back to Turkey and likewise “the resettlement of Syrian refugees in Europe” will begin (Reuters).

Tatjana Festerling: PEGIDA speech, 21 March 2016

The original German video source is broken into two parts totalling nearly 24 minutes. They can be accessed with the following links:

PEGIDA Dresden 21.03.2016 Rede von Tatjana Festerling (1)
PEGIDA Dresden 21.03.2016 Rede von Tatjana Festerling (2)

Good evening Dresden!

The three state elections were nothing other than a referendum on Angela Merkel. And she has failed with a bang. Even in Baden-Württemberg, the ‘little land’ of the economic miracle, Merkel’s party has shrunk inside of four years from 39 to 27 percent. Yet this Federal Chancellor simply carries on. And people the world over wonder whether the Germans are still playing with a full deck. But no one, not one of the over 600 representatives in the Bundestag, none of the 16 Minister-Presidents, none of the members of the Federal Council; simply no one prevents this woman one week later from going through with HER deal with Turkey. With this deal Merkel has betrayed and sold us Germans to Islam. And does that not characterise the condition of our so-called Democracy? They make a great fanfare of refusing to even sit down together in the television studio with the AfD [Alternative für Deutschland]; yet not only do they sit AT a table with the dictator, [Tayyip] Erdogan, no, they allow him to haul them OVER the table [as over a barrel]! And that is precisely what is intended; about that there is no longer any doubt. As recently as the 26th of September the so-called star-investor, George Soros, on his website, spoke in a six-point plan under the name of “Project Syndicate” about the building of a European asylum system.

It was his answer to Viktor Orbán, who had previously attacked him sharply and had identified him as the principal mastermind behind the stream of refugees bound for Europe. The tenor of the Soros text reads: “Europe must”; “Europe has to do”; “Europe is obligated to pay” and “Europe has to absorb and integrate more than a million asylum-seekers and migrants annually”. Soros expressly complains that some EU member states egoistically represent their own national interests; he rails against the “patchwork of 28 separate asylum systems” and blatantly demands a European central government. I ask Mr. Soros: WHY? Why should Europe follow your personal ideas? IS THERE A SINGLE ARGUMENT WHICH IS NOT GROUNDED IN THE WILL TO ANNIHILATION, RECKLESS STRIVING FOR POSSESSIONS, RAGE OR UNBRIDLED CRAVING? Is there a single rational basis for allowing millions of Muslims to feed off of the European unbelievers whom they nevertheless despise so deeply? Is there one, just one single comprehensible reason why Europe’s nations and cultures should abolish themselves, should kill themselves? Hence why is this grandpa interested in our Europe?

Continue reading