The Gagging of Dissent in the EU

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Report24:

The EU wants to get a grip on alternative media and critical reporting worldwide

At the meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, EU Commissioner Věra Jourová urged, among other things, the demonetization of free and alternative media. The pretext: fighting “disinformation” and “hate speech”. Jourová sees the EU as an absolute pioneer and would like to impose insane laws against factual criticism and expressions of opinion on the USA and, ideally, the whole world.

Non-conformity to the narratives set by the ruling leaders (and the World Economic Forum) is undesirable. This has already been shown by the massive fight against alleged “conspiracy theories” (e.g. Covid-19, mRNA gene injection, WEF, Hunter Biden’s laptop and massive censorship by Facebook and Twitter) that have now turned out to be true.

In Germany, too, the mainstream media buckled in the face of vaccine manufacturers such as BioNTech, and changed their reporting at the interjection of Big Pharma. Above all, it was the alternative and free media that repeatedly pointed to critical insights, while the mainstream remained well-behaved and obedient to the government line. This could also be described as a total failure of the so-called “fourth estate”.

But this failure of the corporate and state media is to be rewarded by politicians by wanting to finally turn off the money supply (namely financing via advertising) to the free alternatives. It is true that most of the free media have no access to the perpetuum mobile of the mainstreamers, who have now established a conglomerate of media and advertising companies — Google’s “AdSense” also largely denies these services to critical media. If the EU Commissioner for “Values and Transparency”, Věra Jourová, has her way, not only should the United States adopt the EU rules for so-called “hate speech”, but similar measures against the alleged “disinformation” should also be enforced as far as possible worldwide.

“The European advertising industry […] has confirmed that it will not monetize or support those who spread disinformation,” Jourová proudly declared. And this despite the fact that the alleged “disinformation” of the alternative and free media has proven to be correct and true over and over again in recent times, while the mainstreamers were those who only followed the narratives of the elites repeatedly and became disinformation slingshots themselves. Censorship still takes place in Europe today, just enforced by other means. The fact that Jourová claimed at one point that truths that were unwelcome for politicians are not automatically disinformation can be understood as sheer mockery, especially in view of the past three years.

Incidentally, the fact that the EU Commissioner, in obvious megalomania, raises the EU’s seemingly totalitarian approach to the only true solution for the entire world, causes some head-shaking , especially in the USA. There the so-called “First Amendment”, which contradicts the creation of regulations against alleged “hate speech”, is often still taken very seriously:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

Cracks in the Wall

The following video is a presentation from Italian television about the deleterious effects of the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus. The presenter quotes, among others, a Hungarian biochemist who works for BioNTech and a retired American basketball player for the NBA. The former is not named by the host, but she is Katalin Karikó, who has lived in the USA for many years.

Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

We Have Ways of Making You Take the Vax

Since the arrival of the “pandemic” it has become obvious — if it wasn’t already — that Germans as a culture are collectively immune to irony.

As a case in point, consider the following story from Stuttgart. When someone refuses to accord with what the consensus deems right and proper — in this case, to submit to a COVID “vaccination” — the immediate response is coercion by the state. Not only is the patient to be vaxed against her will, but she happens to be a Jewish survivor of the Holocaust. Obviously, there is no concern about the “optics” of the situation on the part of the German medical and legal bureaucracies.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Court in Stuttgart orders compulsory Corona vaccination of a Holocaust survivor

by Jonas Aston, Max Mannhart and Pauline Schwarz

In Stuttgart, a Jewish composer was forced to be vaccinated as part of her admission to a psychiatric ward. The police are already trying to implement the decision. In the meantime, the district court of Stuttgart suspended the implementation of the measure with immediate effect. The background for this unique process is unclear.

On December 6, 2022, the supervisory court in Stuttgart made a remarkable judgment: namely, the compulsory implementation of a Corona vaccination.

At the request of, the court confirmed the following process: According to a decision by the guardianship court (at the request of her legal guardian), the Jewess Inna Z., who was born in Ukraine in the late 1930s, is to be forced into a closed psychiatric ward of a hospital or a closed unit of a care facility. The background is several diagnosed serious mental illnesses as well as internal diseases; because of those the person concerned is no longer be able to survive on her own — strictly speaking, medical treatment and taking pills cannot be guaranteed without placement.

The vaccination against Covid-19 was necessary “against the will of those affected” as part of the placement for the “benefit of those affected”.

In the decision, the court also authorized the supervisor to carry out a coercive medical measure — specifically, the double vaccination against Covid-19.

The resolution justifying this measure states that vaccination against Covid-19 “against the will of those affected” as part of the placement for the “benefit of those affected” is necessary in order to avert damage to health. However, it does not explain why vaccination is crucial to averting health damage. In addition, unsuccessful attempts had previously been made to “convince the affected person of the necessity of the medical measure.”

The caregiver then asked the police for official assistance in carrying out this decision — this means that the police enforce the accommodation, if necessary using force. The police confirmed to that this administrative assistance was being carried out on January 11th. However, the person concerned could not be found in her apartment, which is why neither compulsory admission nor vaccination have taken place so far. [It must have been an unpleasant déjà-vu for this poor woman. No wonder she ran, and that fact alone tells me that she’s SANE.]

Actually extremely high legal hurdles

As found out on request, the Stuttgart Regional Court temporarily suspended the implementation of the coercive measures on January 11 with immediate effect. The background is initially not a substantive evaluation, but the receipt of a complaint against the decision from those affected. According to the press office, this was only delivered on January 10th — more than a month after the original decision of the district court.

In principle, there are extremely high hurdles in Germany for coercive medical measures against persons who are not of legal age. As a rule, coercive measures such as forced placements and medication are only approved if there is an acute danger to life, life-saving operations and the like. This even goes so far that those affected are often only for a very short time or not at all forcibly placed, even if they are in acute danger to themselves or others (according to the Mental Illness Act). Treatments according to the BGB (Civil Code), which are used for curative treatment, are only rarely approved.

Continue reading

Thailand in Trouble

Our Bangkok correspondent H. Numan sends his report on the latest news from Thailand.

Thailand in trouble

by H. Numan

There is some news from Thailand, unfortunately not very good news. First, royal news. Not really important for you, but very important in Thailand. Before Christmas, Princess Bajrakitiyabha, the eldest daughter of King Rama X, collapsed during a function ‘up country’ due to a sudden heart attack. She was flown to Bangkok for medical treatment, but is still unconscious.

A couple of years ago, we had something similar in The Netherlands: Prince Friso went skiing, caused an avalanche, and had to be rescued. After three hours he was dug up, barely alive and unconscious. He died about three months later, never regaining consciousness.

I fear we’re close to a royal funeral. It’s important in Thailand, not only because she is royalty, but more because she is in the direct line of succession. The king has many children from many wives, but none of them are succession material. Thai succession laws are really complicated; let’s just keep it at that.

Now on to the news. This is so mindbogglingly stupid, that it’s hard to find words for it. Criminally insane is a good description. Thailand is busy reopening its borders for unvaccinated Chinese tourists. It’s not yet certain. Rules don’t change by the day; they change every frigging 10 minutes. At least that’s a sign that not everybody in the government is completely bonkers.

Let’s be clear about one thing: there are a lot of ‘anti-vax’ people here. I don’t agree with them. Please don’t respond with the usual slander, like doing my own research, not being a sheep, that sort of thing. I won’t respond, and it makes you look childish. Of course I’m not a doctor. Neither are you. So let us agree to disagree. What I’m writing about has nothing to do with vaccines, anyway, good or bad. It’s about consequences.

China opened the gates of hell — we call them departure lounges — on 8 January. All of sudden China stopped with their draconian lockdown policy. Why?

Because it was unaffordable. China doesn’t have a working vaccine. They developed Sinovac, which was the least effective vaccine when the pandemic began. Thailand and many other nations used it for want of anything better. It became quickly clear it was not effective, and lost whatever effectiveness it had against later variants. Nobody outside of China uses it today.

The only way China could keep the virus at bay was by instituting draconian — and extremely expensive — lockdowns. It worked, for a while. Lockdowns are expensive in two ways: first you have to test just about everyone twice or three times every week. Let’s say a test kit costs $5 each. That quickly adds up, if you have to test close to a billion people. They simply ran out of money.

The next part is what to do when one tests positive. That’s even worse. Everybody nearby will be put in quarantine. If you live in a large condo, and one occupant tests positive, the whole building goes into quarantine. In China quarantine is like going to prison, with a near certainty you’ll catch something there. If not Covid, something else. The Chinese health care system is rudimentary under the best of circumstances. Right now the circumstances aren’t the best. Quarantine means that entire mega-cities are ‘out of action’; they cost a lot of money and don’t produce anything. Such as Shanghai or Beijing, for example.

There is also the cost in human misery. Something the Chinese government rarely takes into consideration, communist or otherwise. Until they have to, which was at the end of November 2022. The people had had enough, and started to riot. Seriously riot; we’ve seen tanks deployed to counter it. Even so, brute force wasn’t enough. The government caved in. They promised to lessen restrictions and open the borders again.

Continue reading

“The Verdict is Unlawful”

As reported previously, a doctor in Germany named Monika Jiang has been tried, convicted, and sentenced to two years and nine months in prison for writing Corona face mask exemptions for thousands of patients.

Below is another MSM news clip about Dr. Jiang’s conviction, this one by SWR (Südwestrundfunk), the regional affiliate of ARD, the German state broadcaster.

Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

“Masks Restrict Freedom”

As reported previously, a doctor in Germany named Monika Jiang has been tried, convicted, and sentenced to 2¾ years in prison for writing face mask exemptions for thousands of patients.

The following video is an excerpt from a report aired by the TV news magazine “Brisant” on ARD, the German state broadcaster. In it you’ll recognize some of the people interviewed in the video I posted last week about the trial of Dr. Jiang, but in this case they are seen from the point of view of ARD’s own cameras.

Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Teach Those Anti-Maskers a Lesson!

Last Friday I posted a video about the trial of the German doctor Monika Jiang, who was sentenced to almost three years in prison for violating protocol by granting Corona mask exemptions for patients. (More subtitled videos about the case will be coming up shortly.)

In response, our Hungarian correspondent László sends his take on the larger picture behind the persecution of Dr. Jiang.

Teach Those Anti-Maskers a Lesson!

Monika Jiang’s Show Trial: A Political Imprisonment to Intimidate Das Volk All Over the World

by László

After watching the video posted by Gates of Vienna / RAIR Foundation, I started searching for some more info on Mrs. Jiang. And I found very interesting materials from 2020 where she publicly points out that the mask mandate is “psychological warfare” and in another video she explains why mask wearing is so unhealthy for the little ones whose parents turned to her with their children’s health issues, caused by the masks worn in schools at the time.

It’s clear that her approach is based, logical, compassionate, and DESTROYS the official narrative.

And I think this is the real reason for the lawfare against her: to teach those Germans a lesson and to crush a powerful and truthful counter-narrative. I do not think that the fact that the above videos were able stay up on YouTube is a coincidence…

In other words, this is a show trial, and she has been imprisoned for the purpose of intimidating the Germans. Not that it was ever a question… But the details of her story support this conclusion — and thus the good Germans should also address the public, the media and the legal system with the (counter-)message that “you will not intimidate us.”

(Another observation: the old guy in the RAIR video who tells the middle-aged man who was giving an interview not to tell the media his last name might be an agent. Because it is like saying: “be afraid” — which is the overall message of the kangaroo court case in question.)

My conclusions are, I believe, supported by the fact that the global propaganda machinery is pushing this retaliation story even in the Anglo-Saxon world — as the Baron of GoV points out:

Continue reading

An Anti-Democratic and Anti-Constitutional Nightmare

The two principal pillars of totalitarian governance in today’s West are (1) national security, and (2) public health.

These largely unquestioned premises permit the executive to act without democratic input from legislative bodies. In the former case, the national executive can declare an emergency and issue edicts with the force of law. In the latter case, the same process may be initiated at national, state, and local levels.

When the two pillars combine, as has been the case since the onset of the COVID-19 madness, they give birth to an unstoppable juggernaut of dictatorial rule.

In the following commentary, a Swiss lawyer warns about the dangers of the latest public health treaty involving the World Health Organization. Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this op-ed from Uncut News:

Swiss lawyer sounds alarm on proposed changes to WHO International Health Regulations

An article by Philipp Kruse, Swiss Attorney

Published on his Telegram channel, January 3, 2023

Commentary on the proposed amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations

(Although the proposed revisions could still be adjusted before the next General Assembly of WHO Member States in May 2023). These may be found here.

The WHO shows bluntly where the journey is going: into a totalitarian dystopia without fundamental rights — in the name of health.

State of emergency and emergency law are to become the new norm; human rights are no longer protected during pandemics; The health dictatorship no longer bothers to disguise itself. The Secretary-General would be given de facto unlimited powers to declare (and perpetuate) health emergencies. Whether these are really necessary and justified is of no interest to anyone.

At the same time, it acquires (as a result) the competence not only to overrule the basic constitutional order of all states (separation of powers; principle of legality, etc.) in one fell swoop, but also the classic protective rights of individuals. In one sentence: “L’état, c’est WHO!”

If you don’t recognize these warning signs, you really can’t be helped. It cannot be shown more clearly that the WHO is no longer concerned with health, but with the enforcement of the global business interests of Big Pharma and Big IT cartels and ultimately with total control over humanity.

Checks and balances (separation of powers; accountability; control of those responsible), i.e. the basic principles of “good governance”: not a trace!

So far, thanks to Article 3(1) of the IHR, fundamental rights have still applied, at least on paper, in the International Health Regulations. According to the WHO working group, they should soon no longer be anchored there.

Once again the worst fears of us WHO critics of all countries are confirmed!

The only good thing: the spook is recognizable to everyone. The various changes in Article 3 Paragraph 1 and in Article 12 IGV cannot be denied even by disinterested politicians and state media.

Small consolation…

In the future, a small clique of democratically illegitimate technocrats will decide the fate of people all over the world. As has been the case for long stretches since 2020, the WHO Secretary-General and his backers can largely permanently override national constitutions at the push of a button.

Neither state authorities nor civil organizations will ever end unjustified WHO pandemics, nor will they be able to oppose unnecessary “recommendations”.

And if the member states then implement the WHO “vaccination goals”, the national constitutions, the Nuremberg Codex and the UN Covenant for Civil and Political Rights will no longer help people enforce the right to bodily self-determination. “Vaccine targets of the WHO” are thus as de facto legally binding as military orders, and are implemented just as uncompromisingly.

The same will apply to “WHO recommendations” on the obligation for mask-wearing and tests, access restrictions, and lockdowns.

And let’s be honest: All of this was already our global reality to a large extent “under COVID-19”.

Continue reading

“The Masks Make You Sick”

A doctor named Monika Jiang went on trial this week in the German town of Weinheim in Baden-Württemberg. Her crime? During the Coronamadness she wrote more than 4,000 mask exemptions for patients, many of them children, often without making a face-to-face examination.

It’s my guess that she might have been able to beat the rap if she hadn’t charged a fee for her services. As it is, she was convicted and sentenced to two years and nine months in prison. She was also given a three-year work ban and ordered to pay a €28,000 ($29,000) fine.

The English-language stories about the case are all more or less the same. The Daily Mail has a representative example.

The following video was recorded outside of the courthouse in Weinheim during Dr. Jiang’s trial. Demonstrators — many them parents of children for whom the doctor had written exemptions — had gathered to protest the prosecution of Dr. Jiang. The footage shown was taken by a private citizen, possibly with a cell phone, but it shows interviews with protesters conducted by a woman working for ARD, the German public broadcaster. Some of the official ARD clips were later aired by SWR (Südwestrundfunk, the regional franchise for ARD). You can see brief snips in this tweet and this SWR article (both in German).

Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Time to Expose This Dystopian Machine

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the Swiss outlet Uncut News:

Fraud of the mRNA vaccination: Criminal charges for abuse of office against Switzerland’s highest political representative — The charge is the key to exposing this dystopian machine

Who is Pascal Najadi?

Pascal Najadi is an international investment banker and was a member of the Management Board of Dresdner Bank AG, London. He is interested in international affairs and civic debates in Switzerland. He was also the producer of the film “Grounding” about the last days of Swissair.


Good Morning my Friends and Supporters,

We are in the midst of a defensive war and this is a serious matter, so please read all the way to the end and process this information.

We must stop the demagogic WEF WHO Gavi machine as soon as possible by holding our politicians accountable by means of the judiciary, the last bastion of our democracy. Because, we remember Germany in the 1940s; why did it ever come to this? Then ask yourself, how is it that a Ringier CEO Walde instructs his editors to represent only the government line of opinion? This is nothing but propaganda of the worst kind, a fascist act; there is no other way to put it. If Switzerland signs the WHO treaty this year, we will have lost our de jure and de facto sovereignty. If we do not inject our population with 70% of any substance as ordered by the WHO, there will be sanctions against our country. We must exit from the WHO as soon as possible. Then, Gavi Geneva enjoys diplomatic immunity, a foreign NGO. Why does an NGO need immunity? An NGO that carries out vaccination campaigns with substances in Africa. What else are they up to on our territory?

Then we have last but not least Klaus Schwab and his glorious WEF, an organisation that my late father Hussain Najadi helped to bring into being back in the 1970s when it was called EMF (European Management Forum), a good thing back then fostering humanity. My father parted with Schwab because he saw right through his twisted manipulation already back then. The WEF today does the opposite, to control humanity and advocates disposing of “useless” Humans. Klaus Schwab is doing everything he can to create the 2030 Great Reset. Have you ever considered what this is all about? Google it please. Klaus Schwab even says it in public, so sure he is of himself and his machine: “You will own nothing and you will be happy.” Grotesuqe and abhorrent are this twisted man’s thoughts. Fascism is the right word for it.

You just have to be able to calculate 1 plus 1 and not forget to think at the same time. We have to learn to think the thought. Unfortunately, many of us in our society are no longer able to do this nowadays. The origin of this evil is the permanent shallow and demagogic mainstream information flood, diversity, wokeism and other trivial trends that are celebrated. This is our last battle, and humanity must not lose it. We must resist, without violence, but by means of justice.

Continue reading

Only the Good Die Young

Eight obedient citizens in Stuttgart who complied with Germany’s “vaccination” requirement have now joined the ranks of those who “died suddenly”.

Actually, I don’t know for certain that those eight unfortunate souls had been vaxed. I made an assumption, and I shouldn’t do that. So I’ll just say that eight people in their prime died unexpectedly, and no one can figure out why.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Report24. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

City of Stuttgart: Eight employees in their prime die within four weeks

The dead are between 44 and 59 years old. Just a few years ago, one would have said that a 59-year-old is still relatively young and still has at least two fulfilled decades of life ahead of him. It’s different now; numerous people are dying everywhere, the undertakers are reporting on more funerals than ever before. The average life expectancy will soon have to be corrected. You are still not allowed to speak publicly about it.

Three of the dead come from the youth welfare office. It urgently needs to be questioned whether it is normal for the deaths of people of this average age group to accumulate in such a way.

There are numerous areas from which we receive news that the death rate is currently more extreme than has been reported since the Second World War. First there are the tobacconists who report at least 20% more funeral tickets being ordered. Wooden crosses pile up in cemeteries, which are put up right after a funeral until the tombstones are ready. Undertakers report that in the last 150 years there has never been so much work to be done as there is right now.

And the German pension fund is happy about having fewer payments than it has had for a long time; instead of an expected huge loss, they have even recorded a big plus. [Of more than €2 billion instead of a €6 billion LOSS]

Everywhere you can see that excess mortality has reached unbelievable proportions. It is medically certain that the alleged “Corona epidemic” is by no means to blame for the deaths. It is also important to look at the age of the dead. In the case of the city of Stuttgart, the people who died within just four weeks are between 44 and 59 years old.

With such an accumulation of deaths at an unusual age, it would be appropriate from the point of view of the population to initiate an investigation. [I seriously doubt that, since the vast majority hasn’t a backbone to confront any type of “authority” that they’ve helped to be placed over themselves. They have the mindset of slaves and are dying as slaves now — in droves.] Even if the deaths were due to cancer, for example. That too should not be expected at this age with this frequency — in normal times one wanted to know whether, for example, there were specific areas of illness or other or other causes in the work environment.

One may eagerly await the coming time to deal with the situation, the time for the constitutional indictments and the first verdicts. One thing is for sure — a lot of people took part; some are still doing so today. Their complicity will be proven, and soon no one will want to be in their shoes anymore. This applies above all to many unscrupulous system journalists.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

A Victory in Ontario for the Vaccine-Hesitant

A schoolteacher named Rich Daly won an important vax-related case in an Ontario court. A judged ruled that he, rather than his ex-wife, was the most qualified and knowledgeable person to decide whether or not his 8-year-old daughter should be injected with the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus.

Mr. Daly says the ruling is now being used as a precedent in other cases.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for conducting the interview and uploading this video: