You Can’t Deport Him — He Might Stub His Toe!

This new judicial hurdle may make it all but impossible to deport anyone from Germany, no matter how criminal they may be.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from PolitikStube:

Is that our problem? “Livelihood not secured”: Deportation of an Afghan stopped

The Federal Constitutional Court has stopped a planned deportation of a drug addict Afghan to his homeland. The reasoning states that it has not been clarified whether a safe arrival is possible and that the man depends on support from relatives for an orderly life. Is this Germany’s problem, what awaits Afghans in their homeland, or not?

The economic situation was not exactly rosy in Afghanistan before Corona, either, which is why mostly young men came to Germany under the guise of “asylum”, whereby the asylum law is not designed to enable these alleged “asylum seekers” to have an adequate life.

This justification by the court applies in principle to all countries that are economically on a par with Afghanistan, where economic existence is not secured and therefore repatriation is not possible. A very dangerous door that you open when economic reasons are enough to justify a deportation freeze.

This court decision might almost be understood as an invitation, coming right after Merkel’s selfies.

Jew-Hatred in Sweden and the Netherlands

Gary Fouse has translated three articles about Jew-hatred — much of it culture-enriching — in the Netherlands and Sweden.

First, from Nyheter Idag, a story about schools in the Swedish city of Malmö:

Report reveals anti-Semitism in Malmö schools: “It was Arab pupils who had a craze for Hitler”

Malmö — A recent report shows that hate against Jewish pupils comes mainly from peers from the Middle East. The Jewish pupils are held responsible for Israel’s policy in the Israel-Palestinian conflict. Linking the Israel-Palestinian conflict with Malmö’s Jews is something that top Social Democrat politicians have previously done.

“It would help if the Jewish community distanced itself from Israel’s actions in Gaza. That would help a whole lot, I think.”

The words of Jamal El-Hajs, a current member of Parliament for the Social Democrats, at a demonstration in 2010, in an interview with Svenska Dagbladet. At the same demonstration, he called for a boycott of Israeli products and praised party colleague Ilmar Reepalu’s “courage”. Reepalu has on several occasions gotten in trouble for statements about Jews and Israel, including when he questioned whether a tennis match between Sweden and Israel should be played in Malmö.

Now a new report shows that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is central to anti-Semitism in Malmö’s schools. The report also shows that it is not only pupils — especially Arab pupils with a background in the Middle East and especially with connections to the Palestinian territories — but also school personnel who are anti-Semitic.

“From a couple of sources also come specific reports of anti-Semitic jargon among personnel groups,” writes report author Mirjam Katzin, a researcher at Lund University. Katzin is also an elected representative of the Left Party in Malmö.

Katzin’s report consists partly of an interview section where she interviewed school personnel, Jewish children, and young people in the age range 10-20 years, and partly of a survey that was sent out. The goal was that all school personnel in primary and secondary schools would participate in the survey.

Katzin states that she met with unexpected resistance. Only 27 out of 63 primary school principals forwarded her survey to their personnel.

“Jews stay away from certain schools because they don’t feel safe going to those schools. There is a list of schools that are OK for Jews and those that are not. Actually, all high schools are black-listed with the exception of a few, that’s just the way it is. But you know that with this Israel/Palestine — you are going to get s*** for that in the other schools; it is so sad that it is like this,” says one pupil.

The report contains several quotes from those interviewed who point out how Arab pupils openly use anti-Semitic jargon.

“Many, when you talk to them and discuss it, can be reached. But some are deeply involved. Thus, a Jew in Malmö is the enemy. All Jews are the big enemy,” says another school employee.

The second article is from the Dutch daily De Dagelijkse Standaard:

Continue reading

Gates of Vienna News Feed 2/27/2021

After the introduction of “vaccine passports” in Israel, hundreds of people who could prove their vaccination status packed into newly-reopened bars and restaurants. Meanwhile, hundreds of people took to the streets of Dublin to protest the Wuhan Coronavirus lockdown.

In other news, an advisor to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said that more than 15,000 illegal migrants have been detained so far this year as they attempted to enter Hungary.

To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.

Thanks to Caroline Glick, JD, Reader from Chicago, SS, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. I check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

Continue reading

Murder at the Asylum Center

Last week a worker at an asylum center in France was murdered, allegedly by a Sudanese culture-enricher who had been ordered to be deported for committing previous crimes of violence, but had not responded to summonses. The magistrate in the case has ruled out any link to “terrorism”.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from France Info:

Murder in asylum center at Pau. Aggressor charged and jailed

The Sudanese, 38, alleged perpetrator of a deadly attack on Friday, has been placed in provisional detention at the remand center at Pau, the state prosecutor of the town said on Sunday.

February 21, 2021

The prosecutor’s office at Pau announced on Sunday February 21 that a 38-year-old Sudanese had been placed in custody for murder and detained. He is suspected of being the perpetrator of a deadly attack on an official of the asylum center of Pau (Atlantic Pyrenees) that occurred Friday.

At the end of his custody, which had been extended on Saturday, the man appeared on Sunday before a judge. The judge charged him and placed him in provisional detention at the Pau remand center, said the State prosecutor of Pau, Cecile Gensac.

The man is being prosecuted for stabbing (13 wounds have been identified) the head of the reception center for asylum-seekers (CADA, centre d’accueil de demandeurs d’asile) Isard-COS at Pau, where he had been placed a few years ago. The victim, a 46-year-old father and social worker with experience in asylum cases, died of his wounds shortly after the attack.

Destined for imminent expulsion due to convictions for violent crimes

Having been in France since 2015, and the beneficiary of an international protection subsidiary status up to last November, the respondent was destined for an imminent expulsion due to convictions for violent crimes that earned him prison time between January 2017 and August 2018. At the end of 2020, he had not responded to two summons to notify him of the end of his residence permit.

During his interrogation, the man explained to the investigators that he “harbored resentments” against the CADA-Isard-COS of Pau and felt “that his situation had not been correctly handled,” the prosecutor stated Saturday. Fearful of being sent back to Sudan while it was at war, he had come Friday to obtain from this agency, “a paper addressed to the attention of Ofpra (French Office for Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons) to allow him to remain in France,” according to the magistrate.

She stressed that the suspect was, “neither reported nor on file in the context of violent radicalization, and the (information) gathered makes it possible to rule out any terrorist intention.”

How Dare You Interrupt Our Salat!

Note: This incident has a Mohammed Coefficient of at least 33⅓% (the name of the third culture-enricher is unavailable).

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from JournalistenWatch:

Young Muslims beat up 55-year-old German because he disturbed them while they were praying

“Germany belongs to Islam”: This is not a grammatical misunderstanding, but rather the self-image of more and more Muslims living here, above all “devout” Muslims, who see in the submissive, dust-waltzing ingratiation of the dying indigenous majority society not an “integration offer” but rather a despicable weakness and the invitation to claim more and more special rights — which they are usually granted. If necessary, they facilitate the process with violence — something a 55-year-old tenant in Hamburg felt.

At the entrance of his house, three 21- to 27-year-old Muslims allegedly stooped down to pray — and blocked access to the house. The man, who had just parked his Smart in front of the house after a trip to the supermarket, honked the horn and asked the three of them to please clear the way to the house entrance, especially since from outward appearances he took the three to be drug addicts.

Thereupon the three Koran believers suddenly rushed towards him without warning, tore open the doors of his car and beat him furiously. They tore open his shopping bags and smeared him and the entire interior with rice pudding. They also spat on the man several times. Among other things, the saliva of one of the attackers flew straight into his mouth — which particularly shocked him as a corona-risk patient.

Lesson from the new “master race” for culturally insensitive kuffar

The young Muslims, who were already known to the police, now have to answer to the Hamburg-St. Georg District Court. As reported by Bild, two of them — Mohammad N. and Stenio Q. — are in custody because they are an acute risk for flight. As a martyr in the Syrian civil war, N. had allegedly wanted to fight on the side of the Islamic State in 2017, but was arrested at the Turkish border. Of course, Germany was happy to take this “prodigal son” back again. Any refugee matters.

In court, the three excused themselves by saying that they had felt “disturbed in their prayer” by the victim. Tactically clever: the hoped-for religious and cultural bonus always makes an impression in a modern, cosmopolitan Germany that is also immune to any claim of Islamophobia and discrimination. And it justifies — assuming the right cuddle judge — beating up and mistreating an intolerant, latently racist Potato German kafir.

The translator adds this afterword:

And to add insult to injury, the working German “Michel” is forced by the minions of the Merkelstani Caliphate to pay the jizya for the racist and thuggish third-world “master race”.

Jihad Groups Raided in Berlin

Early this morning the “Salafist scene” in Berlin was disrupted by police raids on 25 of its premises.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this brief news video, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

The accompanying article, also translated by Gary Fouse, is from Tagesschau:

Radical-Islamist milieu

Raids in Berlin and Brandenburg

February 25, 2021

Police in Berlin and Brandenburg in the early morning searched several targets — it concerns a radical Islamist association that is banned as of today. Hundreds of police have been deployed.

by Michael Götschenberg

Since the early morning hours, police in Berlin and Brandenburg have been searching more than 25 targets. According to information from ARD-Capital City Studio, the raids are directed against the radical-Islamist association Jama’atu Berlin, or Tauhid Berlin. As of today, it is banned and will be dissolved. About 20 people are connected with it, most of whom have been firmly rooted in the radical-Islamist milieu for years.

The association operates several social-media channels, in which they glorify the so-called “Islamic State”, advocate the killing of believers of other religions, and express strong anti-Semitism. In addition, it rejects the state order and advocates the establishment of an Islamic state of God.

Hundreds of agents deployed

The police deployed 850 agents, including special forces. The target of the searches is, above all, to secure evidentiary material for the ban of the association. There is no imminent danger — the possible attack plans of the group are not known.

Thus far, the members of the association met mostly in private quarters. Some members of the group used to frequent the notorious Fussilet Mosque, which was a magnet for the jihadist milieu of Berlin. The attacker of Breitscheidplatz, Anis Amri, also went in and out of there.

No arrests planned

The Fussilet Mosque was banned in February 2017. Members of the Jama’atu Berlin were also active in the framework of the so-called “Read!” campaign of the radical-Islamist association, “The True Religion”, in which Korans were distributed. This association was banned by the Federal Interior Ministry in 2016.

Arrests in conjunction with the searches today are not planned. However, investigative proceedings against individual members of the group, who in the past, have been extremely aggressive against police, are ongoing. In the morning, Interior Senator Andreas Geisel will give details in a press conference.

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Lockdowns Are Halal

Ashraf Ramelah sends this report on the response of Islamic law to COVID-19 restrictions.

Islamic Shariah embraces Covid-19 controls: Compliance guarantees paradise

By Dr. Ashraf Ramelah

More than a year ago, the world began its battle with an invisible enemy — the novel Covid-19 virus. The fight resulted in a crisis in health care, the economy, the family and much more. While controversy over its magnitude and even its existence rages on and exploitation of the numbers continues, money is made and societies are engineered. In the Arab-Muslim part of the world, Islam further capitalizes on the authoritarian controls of the current pandemic event in place to handle the virus spread and seems to relish the expansion of top-down oppression in the Western world.

For the Egyptian Fatwa House, the Shariah legal body, affirmation of the appropriate enforcement of government mask mandates, social distancing and lockdowns comes with a further control mechanism — the edict — created by the Shariah council to be the final piece of compliance. Adding the spiritual realm to the medical environment, the following edict was issued late last year (Nov 24, 2020). It will remain in effect indefinitely:

“Wearing a mask and following the decisions of the competent authorities at the time of epidemics is a legitimate duty; In order to protect souls and ward off the negative consequences of not adhering to them.” (emphasis added).

With this edict, social controls are now converted to religion with a moral impact upon the soul. Contradicting Covid-19 orders has dire eternal consequences. Coming as a faith directive, “protect souls” is literal, and “ward off the negative consequences” means avoiding eternal damnation. An irrefutable religious law, the current edict commands obedience to secular, government mandates (legal or illegal) with a reward in heaven when followed and, more troubling, an afterlife penalty when not.

Turning the virus pandemic into a matter of the soul would seem to be the logical reason for the Islamic religious institute to issue such a statement, although the language in the continued quote reveals a more material, ideological interest.

Religious authorities are attaching the well-being of the public to arbitrary, mandated rules that control human interaction and function as the Shariah. Controlling the will of an individual in the process of seeking to curtail the spread of a virus is real power. Controls on human behavior are both relatable and significant for the Fatwa House religious authorities who are in charge of creating and issuing edicts.

The Fatwa House spokesperson continues with the edict:

Continue reading

Fjordman Interview, Part 6: “Breivik Wanted to Copy al-Qaida”

This is the sixth excerpt from a January 11 interview with Fjordman. Previously: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5.

Below is the sixth installment of the Document.no interview, recorded on January 7 and published on January 11. It was translated for subtitles by Fjordman himself.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

BBC Misinformation: Mohammed Film “Innocence of Muslims”

The following essay by Michael Copeland was originally published in shorter form by LibertyGB in 2012.

The film trailer, “Innocence of Muslims”, depicts episodes in the life of Mohammed. Blackened without cause, it was wrongfully blamed by Hillary Clinton for the unrelated jihad attack on the US Embassy in Benghazi that killed four Americans. The Obama administration, disgracing the First Amendment, publicly apologised for it in Pakistan. The film, albeit low-budget, is important for being a pioneer work.

BBC Misinformation: Mohammed Film “Innocence of Muslims”

By Michael Copeland

“Q&A: Anti-Islam film”

On their news website the BBC have an article headed “Q&A: Anti-Islam film”. This heading neatly furnishes the desired viewpoint for the readers, to colour their understanding, and probably remain in their memories. Typical of the BBC’s articles on Islam, the author is unidentified. Consequently there is no disclaimer limiting to the author the opinions expressed: they are presented as the BBC’s own.

The writer, obviously not one of the BBC’s usual named film critics, carefully provides a slant by announcing the film as “anti-Islam”. In the text it is further criticised as “satirising” and “mocking” Mohammed: the writer calls his depicted actions “insulting”. The film, Innocence of Muslims, is a very low budget trailer. It is a brief biographical documentary, portraying incidents from the life of Mohammed, as recorded in Islam’s source texts. The BBC, who produce both satires and documentaries, have the facilities to verify the accuracy of these pejorative critiques. Their editors failed. The film does not satirise, insult, or mock Mohammed’s actions: it is not anti-Islam.

The article says:

“The footage appears to depict Islam as a religion of violence and hate.”

Are the BBC being threatened? Can they not decide whether the film depicts Islam as a religion of violence and hate, or only “appears to” do so? The writer does not say the film “appears to” be anti-Islam, or “appears to” be satirising and mocking. Why the uncertainty? Of course, this is a false critique. The BBC’s unnamed writer is blowing smoke. This bluff is there to convey, falsely, an impression of injured surprise, so as to put people off from checking for themselves. It is there to affirm and shore up the carefully planted propaganda deception, “Islam is peace”, with which George W. Bush was duped, and, after him, Hillary Clinton and a line of British politicians. This lie and its companion, “perversion of Islam”, have run and run. The writer does not want them to be disturbed.

“Let’s be clear,” said Hillary Clinton, “Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.” Hear Tony Blair: “…there is not a problem with Islam… there is no doubt about its true and peaceful nature… The doctrine and teachings of Islam are those of peace and harmony… It is a whole teaching dedicated to building peace in the world…” (quoted by Douglas Murray, The Strange Death of Europe). Of the terrorists’ motivation Blair says: “It’s an ideology based in a complete perversion of the proper faith of Islam… …perversion of Islam is the source of a lot of the problems in the Middle East”.

David Cameron repeated the same narrative, in his best emphatic air of authority: “They are killing and slaughtering thousands of people… They boast of their brutality. They claim to do this in the name of Islam. That is nonsense. Islam is a religion of peace. They are not Muslims. They are monsters.”

So, too, Theresa May, adopting her authoritative and confident tone, “It is an ideology that is a perversion of Islam… Islam is entirely compatible with British values and our national way of life.”

These are all falsehoods. They are what smooth-talking Islamic deceivers, like serial liar Tariq Ramadan, advisor to both Blair and Cameron, have been feeding to politicians under Islam’s doctrine of “Permissible Lying” (Manual of Islamic Law, Reliance of the Traveller, r8). Islam is all sweetness, you see: it could not possibly be a religion of violence and hate. This also complies with the tyrannical political correctness that prevents true descriptions from being expressed.

Islam authorises deception of kafirs. This has an Arabic name, taqiyya. “Using deception to mask intended goals” is instructed in the Muslim Brotherhood’s secret “Explanatory Memorandum” captured in a police raid. The deceived politicians’ rosy picture is completely at variance with Islam’s track record, its source texts, and its leaders’ announcements, all accessible on the internet. The BBC themselves were told directly by Anjem Choudary: “Islam does not mean ‘Peace’: it means ‘Submission’.” Apparently BBC editors know better.

The film Innocence of Muslims is accurate.

“Violence is the heart of Islam”, says Ayatollah Yazdi of Iran, advisor to Iran’s Ahmadinejad. “Battle,” — which is violent — “animosity, and hatred …are the basis of our religion”, explained Osama bin Laden in his open letter after 9/11. “Islam is a religion of blood for the infidels. Prophet had sword to kill people,” proclaimed Ayatollah Khomeini; “a religion of war and conflict”, said Caliph al Baghdadi; “a permanent war institution”, instructs Al Azhar in Cairo. “Islam is a religion of power, fighting, jihad, beheading and bloodshed”, says Imam Hussein Bin Mahmoud, a prominent writer. “Muslims… must have… enmity and hatred” of kafirs, instructs islamqa.com. “As a Muslim”, explained Anjem Choudary to the BBC’s own Newsnight, “I must have hatred for everything that is non-Islam”. Don’t the BBC’s editors listen?

The Koran, which anyone can consult online, is the authority. The “excellent pattern” praised in Koran 60:4 is: “between us and you enmity and hatred forever…”. Koran 9.5, a late verse which overrides — “abrogates” — all peaceful verses elsewhere, because they are earlier, says: “Kill the idolaters wherever you find them…”. Christians count as idolaters because Islam teaches, erroneously, that they worship the cross. There are many, many more verses which repeat these themes. The verses are — all of them — part of Islamic law, with the death penalty for denying even one (Manual of Islamic Law, Reliance of the Traveller, o8.7(7)). Can the BBC’s editors not read them? Do they patronisingly assume that their viewers cannot read them?

The article goes on to say:

Continue reading

Eritrean Terror Cell Busted in Sweden

Two culture-enriching “Swedes” have been arrested by Swedish authorities for allegedly plotting an Islamic terrorist attack in Addis Ababa.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

The following article (also translated by Gary Fouse) was posted by the online news site Samtiden, which is published by Sverigedemokraterna (the Sweden Democrats).

Two arrested in Sweden for terror plans

February 21, 2021

A 44-year-old with Eritrean citizenship who resides in Gothenburg has been singled out as the “brain” behind a planned terror attack against the embassy in Ethiopia’s capital city, Addis Ababa. 15 have been arrested in Ethiopia and 3 [sic — should be 2] in Sweden.

The 44-year-old is alleged to be the leader of an Iranian terrorist sleeper cell that Iran activated to find a target for a terror attack in Africa. They are alleged to have studied the embassies of the USA and Israel in Addis Ababa but chose the United Arab Emirates. Ethiopia’s security service was able to stop the attack by arresting 15 persons.

Over time, several details about the terror plans leaked out in various countries, including the arrests in Sweden at the end of last year.

“Ethiopia and Sweden cooperated and interrupted the conspiracy,” an American intelligence chief, Rear Admiral Heidi K. Berg, told The New York Times recently.

She also pointed out one of the two men arrested in Sweden and called him the “brain” behind the planned terror attack in Ethiopia. The United Arab Emirates embassy was allegedly chosen based on the countries’ rapprochement with Israel.

Arrested for conspiracy to commit a terrorist crime

Swedish authorities are silent. It will be some time before the preliminary investigation is completed, stated the prosecutor to Kvällsposten.

The 44-year-old is suspected on probable cause of conspiracy to commit a terrorist crime. He denied the crime during arrest proceedings.

Shortly before the 44-year-old was arrested, Security Police raided an apartment in Trelleborg, where another 44-year-old man resides. He was also arrested on probable cause, suspected of conspiracy to commit a terrorist crime during November 2020 in Sweden and abroad.

The man arrested in Trelleborg worked earlier as a bodyguard, he stated in a report. He has worked as a personal assistant in Sweden. He also denies planning a terror attack.

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Warning

Our English correspondent Seneca III weighs in on some of the latest skirmishes in the culture wars of our 21st-century dystopia.

Warning

by Seneca III

This royal throne of kings, this sceptred isle,
This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars,
This other Eden, demi-paradise,
This fortress built by Nature for herself
Against infection and the hand of war,
This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea,
Which serves it in the office of a wall,
Or as a moat defensive to a house,
Against the envy of less happier lands,

This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
This nurse, this teeming womb of royal kings,
Fear’d by their breed and famous by their birth,
Renowned for their deeds as far from home,
For Christian service and true chivalry,
As is the sepulchre in stubborn Jewry,
Of the world’s ransom, blessed Mary’s Son,
This land of such dear souls, this dear dear land,
Dear for her reputation through the world,
Is now leased out
, I die pronouncing it,
Like to a tenement or pelting farm:
England, bound in with the triumphant sea
Whose rocky shore beats back the envious siege
Of watery Neptune, is now bound in with shame,
With inky blots and rotten parchment bonds:
That England, that was wont to conquer others,
Hath made a shameful conquest of itself.
Ah, would the scandal vanish with my life,
How happy then were my ensuing death!

— William Shakespeare, Richard II, Act II Scene 1

These days in this sceptred isle we have to be extremely careful about what we think and say or very soon we are graced with a home visit from the Thought Police who somewhat less than gently set about ‘correcting your thinking’ according to the demands of some affirmative-actioned university professor’s ‘Directive for the Forceful Imposition of Diversity, Subservience, Statue Allergy, Reparations and the Eradication of Unconscious (Whites Only) Bias’… and, under those circumstances, for God’s sake don’t even mention the enriching stabby-stabby collective, the County Lines Recreational Chemicals Network or the religiously-sanctioned and government covered-up kiddy-fiddling epidemic, because these are but what is known as ‘protected characteristics’ under Article 1 of the “Animal Farm”-inspired ‘Double Standards for BAMEs*’ legislation which will be upheld with even-handedness and impartiality at all times provided you sport a high density of eumelanin or bang your head on the floor on a Friday morning.

However, if you should fall foul of the British STAPO, this earlier article details your UK (England & Wales) rights in law, police powers, how and how not to respond when accosted and questioned on your doorstep or in public (say nothing other than to confirm your name and address if they already know it, but do it calmly and politely and record it if you can), the circumstances under which they can and cannot or should not (forcefully without warrant) enter your home, how to deal with the situation if arrested and formally interrogated, plus a short catalogue of other useful information.

Furthermore, don’t let the STAPO intimidate or fluster you, verbally or physically, by their presence and attitude. That is invariably their modus operandi and is often very fruitful (for them) when dealing with poorly informed or unprepared long-heritage native citizens who happen to have a different opinion to that of the invasive alien abscesses now festering in large numbers on and within the corpus of this once green and pleasant land.

Continue reading

Fjordman Interview, Part 5: “They Had to Invent a Version of Me as the Culprit”

This is the fifth excerpt from a January 11 interview with Fjordman. Previously: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4.

Below is the fifth installment of the Document.no interview, recorded on January 7 and published on January 11. It was translated for subtitles by Fjordman himself.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

For more on Breivik’s letters from prison see “Breivik’s ‘Double-Psychology’””.

Video transcript:

Continue reading

The Malmö City Government Bankrolls the Jihad

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating from the online news site Samtiden, which is published by Sverigedemokraterna (the Sweden Democrats).

Stop giving tax money to Islamists

Despite well-documented connections to extreme Islamists, Malmö continues to grant city contributions. Stop blaming ignorance and stop the contributions, demands Nima Gholam Ali Pour in a debate article.

Last fall, the Malmö imam Salahuddin Barakat attacked French President Emmanuel Macron after he gave a talk directing certain criticisms at political Islam, and suggested certain measures. This caused Baraka, in a long Facebook post, to describe France as “an extremely secular and increasingly Islamophobic rogue state, which for a long time has lived and still lives by sucking out the blood of the weak in the world.”

Salahuddin Barakat is the founder and chairman of Islam Academy, an educational institution that has the ambition to become “Sweden’s foremost Muslim educational institution, which in a qualitative way, will meet Muslims’ knowledge needs and contribute to a deeper understanding of Islam and its teaching in society.”

The Islam Academy issues derogatory assessments

The Sweden Democrats of Malmö criticized the Islam Academy in 2017 after the culture magazine Opulens revealed certain homophobic statements that were posted on Islam Academy’s home page. Among other things, homosexual persons were compared to the mentally ill. The Sweden Democrats in Malmö wrote in a debate article in Kvallsposten that this was not appropriate that an organization with views like Islam Academy be given legitimacy through the cooperation of the city of Malmö.

In a report in Fokus by Lars Åberg, it was mentioned that Salahuddin Barakat advocates that women and men be separated and not have physical contact. According to Åberg, Barakat describes daily life in Sweden in the following way: “Moral corruption, irresponsible behavior, non-Islamic values regarding interaction between the sexes, and exaggerated sexualization are something that is widespread in our society. At the same time, we suffer from a lack of religious knowledge and insufficient practice of Islam.”

Prize for human rights from Malmö

In spite of the fact that since 2017 there has been information that Salahuddin Barakat has extreme values that are not rooted in Swedish society, in 2019 Barakat received the city of Malmö’s prize for human rights for his work with the inter-religious project Amanah. It is important to mention in this connection that the Ibn Rushd Study Association has two representatives on Amanah’s board of directors.

It is possible to call into question such an inter-religious project when the Muslim side is represented by persons like Salahuddin Barakat and Islamist organizations like Ibn Rushd, whose contribution is called into question in municipality after municipality.

Grant of one million by Malmö

Although this information about Barakat has been available, the municipal working board in the city of Malmö, consisting of Social Democrats, moderates, and liberals, decided unanimously on June 17, 2019 to grant Amanah 1.5 million kronor in tax funds for the period 2019-2022.

Continue reading

Jihad on the Tram

A culture-enriching youth from Somalia caused a bit of a ruckus yesterday on a tram in Rome. When the Italian authorities complete their investigation, I’m certain they’ll find the unfortunate incident had nothing to do with Islam or terrorism.

[By the way: this isn’t the first time I’ve reported about a jihad attack on a tram. Compare this one with the one that occurred in Utrecht two years ago, which was far more deadly.]

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from Il Messaggero:

Rome: Threatens passengers on tram with bar. Witnesses: “He was shouting Allahu Akhbar”

February 19, 2021

Shouting “Allahu Akhbar” and threatening passengers on the tram. It happened this morning at Piazza Vittorio, a few steps from the Terminal Station. With his face covered, a 23-year-old of Somali origin terrorized those present with an extinguisher and an iron bar, which he held in his hand.

Stolen documents recovered

The call to 112 [EU emergency number, equivalent of 911] came in the morning. Police from the Esquilino and Viminale police stations intervened immediately. In the tram, they discovered the man and told him to uncover his face. But he refused. When the police managed to block him, they seized everything, the extinguisher, iron bar, and the garment used to cover his face. Then they searched him and found more: stolen documents belonging to other persons.

The Somali was already known to police

It was not the first time that the young man has come into contact with the police, given that he had already been stopped in the past. Now, on the other hand, he will have to answer for various crimes. He has been arrested for aggravated threats, receiving stolen property, interrupting public service and carrying an illegal weapon.