New Book Documents Deaths from Corona Vaccines

An earlier version of this essay was first published in Norwegian at the website Document.

New Book Documents Deaths from Corona Vaccines

by Fjordman

Ute Krüger is originally from Germany, but has lived in Sweden for almost 20 years; she worked for years there as a senior physician and speaks Swedish well. She specializes in pathology and is also a cancer researcher.

Krüger has decades of experience in analyzing how changes in cells and tissues in patients can be linked to specific diseases. She has recently co-published a book in German with documentation of patients who have probably been killed by the Corona vaccines. In this connection, she gave a video interview in Swedish.[1]

Together with Professor Walter Lang, in Berlin in 2024 Ute Krüger published the textbook Geimpft — gestorben. Histopathologischer Atlas der Corona-Impfschäden. Gedenkschrift für Prof. Arne Burkhardt.[2] This can be translated as “Vaccinated — died. Histopathological atlas of Corona vaccine damage. Commemorative publication for Prof. Arne Burkhardt.” The book contains 138 pages with 112 illustrations and 57 case descriptions. Work is underway to translate it into English.

The deceased described in the book came from different age groups. The youngest victim was a 16-year-old. The deceased had received from one to four doses of the Corona vaccine before they died. They received various vaccines, including those from AstraZeneca and Moderna, but the most widespread was the mRNA-based product from Pfizer-BioNTech.

Mass vaccination against the coronavirus began in 2021. People such as Steve Kirsch have documented an indirect, statistical link between coronavirus vaccines and excess mortality since 2021. Yet this book presents concrete evidence based on tissue samples from individual patients.

As early as 2021, the late German pathologist Arne Burkhardt and his colleague Walter Lang warned that the autopsy of several deceased patients showed that they had probably died from injuries caused by COVID-19 vaccines. This conclusion was rejected by the authorities.[3] Several of the patients were autopsied because their relatives were not sure why the person had died.

The experienced pathologists Burkhardt and Lang, who worked in Reutlingen, Germany, received tissue samples sent by pathologists or forensic institutes from all over Europe. Priority was given to analyzing deaths that could be linked to the vaccines. However, tissue samples from living patients were also sent in if there was a suspicion that vaccination could be the cause of the tissue damage.

The book co-authored by Krüger is a pioneering work. They use specific tissue samples from patients and link their medical history or death directly to the so-called Corona vaccines.

The vaccines damage various parts of the body at the cellular level and can also cause blood clots. Ute Krüger emphasizes that the vaccine damage is not specific to just one organ. Changes and injuries were found all over the body of the deceased, in those cases where they could check this. In analyses and microscopes, they also noted that the more injections the deceased had received, the greater the damage.

The British pathologist Claire Craig supports the conclusion that the injections cause damage to cells and organs all over the body. Less vaccinated areas in the UK and other countries have had less excess mortality. However, the damage is not just about deaths, although there are a frightening number of them. There are also more people who are ill, with a variety of symptoms. Again, we can see a similar pattern in several countries. Craig believes that the public were told lies by their authorities during the lockdowns in 2020 and the vaccination campaign that began in 2021. She concludes that the so-called vaccines led to heart attacks and excess mortality, as well as high rates of disability and long-term illness.[4]

Continue reading

Who Says Crime Doesn’t Pay?

It pays quite well, at least for the criminals being deported from Germany to Afghanistan. You get to come to Germany, live on the dole, rob and rape to your heart’s content, and then they give you a cool €1,000 when they send you home. What’s not to like?

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit:

€1,000 in tax money for each

Germany deports 28 criminals to Afghanistan

For the first time in three years, Germany is sending Afghan criminals back to their homeland — and giving each criminal €1,000. The well-known rapist of a 14-year-old girl can also look forward to the money.

Berlin

For the first time since the Taliban seized power, Germany has deported people to Afghanistan. A total of 28 Afghan criminals were on a plane that took off from Leipzig on Friday morning and was bound for Kabul, reported Der Spiegel.

Government spokesman Steffen Hebestreit confirmed the incident: “These were all Afghan nationals, all of whom were convicted criminals who had no right to remain in Germany and against whom deportation orders had been issued.” Federal Minister of the Interior Nancy Faeser (SPD) also confirmed the procedure on the internet platform X. “Germany is deporting 28 criminals to Afghanistan today. Our security counts, our constitutional state is acting. I would like to thank the federal police and the states for their close cooperation,” wrote the minister.

There were no negotiations with Afghanistan

The criminals were driven from various federal states to Leipzig. Each deportee received an additional €1,000 in cash. A doctor was also on board.

Among those who benefited from the €1,000 were the rapist from Illerkirchberg, who raped and abused a 14-year-old girl for hours, an Afghan with more than 160 criminal offenses, and other child rapists.

The deportation is said to have been in preparation for two months. However, negotiations were not held with the Taliban regime, but with the Emirate of Qatar. Due to the “difficult conditions”, Germany “asked key regional partners for support to make the repatriation possible”, confirmed Hebestreit.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

Memories and Cycles

Seneca III sends a retrospective on Labour-governed Britain from the end of the Second World War until the present.

Memories and Cycles

by Seneca III

The early impressions of childhood take on a permanency that later experiences of places, people, smells, patterns of sound and memorable events impressed during the journey of life do not, because as time passes those things register in the back rooms of the mind, whilst the memories of childhood become a sort of mental book cover that outlasts all of the pages it holds together. Thus it is that I, as I enter into the late winter of my years, can clearly remember the Air Raid Shelters in the middle of my terraced street, the Anderson Shelters in the back gardens and the burnt-out factory opposite that had fallen foul of a stray Luftwaffe incendiary intended for the railhead shunting yards a mile to the north.

Most vividly of all I remember VE day and the street party when the wives and mothers of those still serving overseas in the BAOR or the Far East of those KIA or WIA and still lying in hospitals had laid out trestle tables piled high with cakes and savouries of all shapes and sizes baked from hoarded and probably black-market flour, sugar and spices. I remember as if it was yesterday the yards and yards of Union Jack bunting fluttering and chattering overhead in the gentle breeze of a warm early May, competing with the chirrupings of the flock of house sparrows that descended in a flurry upon the crumbs that had fallen from our eager young hands.

However, no matter that the cycles of history move slowly, they do so inexorably, and thereafter my time of growing up in a post-war world would become one of revelations, of the taste of real butter and the end to rationing, of taking my carefully horded pennies down to the corner shop and buying as many gobstoppers and sherbets as I could afford. I remember a frenzy of digging and cable laying in the street outside which my mother told me was to bring ‘AC’ to replace the old ‘DC’, a piece of meaningless information to me then but one which was to lie inert in my childhood memory until later in life.

But time never rests in one place, and those few short years of innocence continued after my father had been demobbed and we were a family at last. There followed primary school, secondary school, an eleven plus exam and a grammar school. Beyond the confines of those institutions it was by then a world of Teddy Boys, of drainpipe trousers, crepe-soled blue suede shoes, Elvis haircuts, a time of the daily horse and cart deliveries of milk and bread being replaced by electric floats that didn’t drop heaps of steaming fertiliser for our vegetable patch and then they in their turn were eventually replaced by the early ‘supermarkets’ which were small enough to fit in a far corner of one of the enormous emporia we shop in today.

I missed the ’60s in their entirety, being overseas and up to my neck in mud, blood and beer, but the resultant slippery slope that the ’60s created slid us into cultural decline that was inescapable and was the precursor the toxic, hedonistic ‘wokeism’ that now permeates every aspect of our existence and is having a similar but far more deleterious effect. History does indeed repeat itself, mostly in different ways, but repeat itself it does.

Thereafter, despite being rather apolitical at the time, I gradually became aware of the intermittent series of Labour governments that had taken office following the dissolution of the wartime coalition. First came the Clement Atlee government of 1945-1951, which brought with it a not unreasonable incarnation of relatively benign Socialism, staffed as it was in the main by people who had experienced the deprivations of at least one world war and in some cases two, and who wanted no more of it.

Atlee and his confederates had come into power in 1945 determined to improve the lot of the common man. Their objective was to bring about full employment, a mixed economy and a greatly enlarged system of social services provided by the State, and on the whole they were successful. To that end, they undertook the nationalisation of public utilities and major industries, implemented wide-ranging social reforms, including the passing of the National Insurance Act of 1946, the National Assistance Act of 1948 and the formation of the National Health Service (NHS), also in 1948. However, what Atlee and his comrades didn’t foresee was how their Labour successors and their Union puppet-masters would, over time, distort, manipulate and use those successes in order to create this oppressive draconian abomination of a country that Starmer and his Thought Police now seek to rule with a draconian fist in the name of that fatal oxymoron Diversity Equity and Inclusion. But, before we address that, let us have a look at Atlee’s successors in order of their appearance.

First out of the blocks came the two term Prime Minister Harold Wilson (1964-1970 and 1974-1976) the pipe-smoking, allegedly philandering, outwardly genial man-of-the-people who was as much a puppet of the Trade Unions and the far left as Starmer is today. During his first term as Prime Minister Wilson initiated and participated in the infamous beer and sandwiches meetings with Union leaders in Number 10. In the five years from 1964 up until the last increases made by his first administration, supplementary benefits went up by 26%, and sickness and unemployment benefits by 153%, sowing the seeds for the burden created now by the millions happily living on benefits and contributing nothing to the commonweal.

Continue reading

Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. — Chapter 16

Below is the sixteenth chapter in the serialization of Paul Weston’s book Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. Previously: Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15.

Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime.

by Paul Weston

Chapter 16: Pfizer’s Criminal Past

As we have seen, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla flat-out lied about safety signals regarding the Covid-19 vaccine. Does he have previous form for dishonesty? That we don’t yet know, but does Pfizer itself have a history of dishonesty, fraud and multiple deaths linked to its products? You bet it does.

Between 2000 to 2020, Pfizer was involved in multiple lawsuits and made multiple payouts to the tune of an astonishing $4.7 billion. In long hand, that is 470,000,000,000 dollars.

The list of claims against Pfizer related to the following: manipulating drug trials, bribery of officials, causing deaths and disabilities, lying about deaths and disabilities, falsifying data, violating federal anti-racketeering laws etc. Over a billion dollars was paid out for offences related to dodgy government contracts. Hello, Ursula von der Leyen and many others!

In November 2021, the British Medical Journal revealed the Ventavia Research Group (sub-contracted by Pfizer) had falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in the crucial phase III trial for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.

I rather think this answers my earlier question then, regarding the moral and ethical virtue of Pfizer prohibiting it from lying about the missing ninety-two people in the vaccine trial. Pfizer clearly lies all of the time when billions of dollars are involved. There is every reason to believe they lied about the missing people in the Covid vax trial, considering the vast sales due in 2021 (and onwards) dwarfed anything Pfizer had ever achieved before.

Conclusion: I am going to quote Simon Elmer here. Simon has forensically researched everything Covid-19-related, and elegantly and concisely written it up in his book The Road to Fascism: For a Critique of the Global Biosecurity State, which I highly recommend. His words then, are my conclusion. They are simply too good not to be pinched and used here:

Continue reading

Bacha Bazi Comes to Trieste

A group of Afghan culture-enrichers seems to have experienced a sexual emergency in the Italian city of Trieste. When they implored a group of four Pakistani teenage boys to help them alleviate their distress, they were refused. In their rage they responded by attacking the boys with knives.

Such is life in Modern Multicultural Italy.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from ANSA:

Gang wounds several boys for refusing to provide sexual favors

Among those stabbed also a minor

Last night a gang of about 15 persons, Afghan migrants, injured young Pakistani immigrants — including one minor — who refused to offer their sexual favors.

The latter subjects were stabbed in various parts of the body and one of them has very serious wounds; all of them are being treated at the Cattinara hospital.

According to what has been learned, at Molo Audace* in the city center, the gang approached the four Pakistanis asking for sexual favors and money. When it was refused, the attack broke out.

One of the wounded managed to get to the Questura [police station], where he was aided by some officers.

The attack happened in the zone of Molo Audace, a gathering place, especially in the summer, for people who live in the city but also for many immigrants.

According to a reconstruction, based on the victims’ report, the attack broke out around 10pm. The alarm was given by a patrol of the Flying Squad [mobile unit] that intervened in the vicinity of the Questura because a Pakistani citizen, just turned 18, reported that he had been stabbed in the back because shortly before, he had refused to provide a sexual favor.

The victim, shortly after giving his version of what happened, lost consciousness due to the deep wound he had suffered and was urgently taken by ambulance to Cattinara.

Within the space of a few minutes, however, three other victims of attack showed up independently at the same hospital, all of Pakistani nationality. They were a 19-year-old boy, who had reported deep stab wounds and who was received in code red, a 16-year-old adolescent with obvious injuries to his face, and another 19-year-old youth with minor injuries.

Continue reading

It’s His Fault! — No, It’s HIS Fault!

Well, I woke up today, and the reports on Butler fiasco just got worse and worse. The evidence for (at best) massive, unbelievable incompetence on the part of the Secret Service keeps coming in, to the point that the Director Chick, a diversity hire named Kimberly Cheatle, has found it expedient to blame local law enforcement for allowing a marksman with a high-powered rifle to gain access to a rooftop with a clear line-of-sight shot at Mr. Trump’s head:

According to MSN:

The Secret Service said local police were supposed to secure the rooftop from which gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks attempted to assassinate former President Donald Trump.

The federal agency noted the area was outside its designated perimeter for protection.

Local Pennsylvania police officers were responsible for securing and patrolling the factory grounds of American Glass Research, situated approximately 130 yards from where Trump spoke on Saturday, Secret Service representative Anthony Guglielmi said, according to the New York Times.

The Secret Service was assigned to oversee the area where Trump’s rally was held, while local police were brought in to support those efforts and ensure security outside the rally site.

Additionally, CNN reported that one of two local counter-sniper teams was supposed to cover the building where the gunman was positioned.

Neighbors living near Butler Farm Show Grounds claimed they never received visits from any law enforcement agencies, local or federal, in the days before or during the rally despite expecting such security measures as part of the operation, according to the New York Post.

The Secret Service said that relying on local law enforcement for support is a common practice when managing event security.

OK, support by local law enforcement, that’s fine. But depending on them to make sure that a crucial rooftop is clear — that’s not their job; it’s the Secret Service’s job.

So now we have the unseemly spectacle of the director of the Secret Service blaming local law enforcement for her agency’s failure to do its job. Which means that they DELEGATED crucial parts of that job to other actors, which in turn violates the statutory definition of their task. Their job is to protect the president, not to delegate the task to someone else.

Even if the local cops messed up, the responsibility for any failure to protect may be laid solely at the feet of the United States Secret Service.

In a normal, rational political system, Ms. Cheatle’s color coordinated epaulettes would already have been ripped from her uniform, and she would have been forced into immediate retirement while being stripped of her pension. She would be lucky to avoid prosecution for dereliction of duty, or whatever the charge would be for the head of a civilian agency.

But it gets worse.

According to The Daily Mail (hat tip Conservative Tree House), there was no Secret Service sniper stationed near Thomas Crooks’ roosting spot because the slope of the roof was considered too steep:

Continue reading

Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. — Chapter 11

Below is the eleventh chapter in the serialization of Paul Weston’s book Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. Previously: Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.

Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime.

by Paul Weston

Chapter 11: Did Lockdowns, Masks & Social Distancing Work?

Lockdowns: No, lockdowns didn’t work. This is simply because there was never such a thing as total lockdown, where every single person remained holed up in their property for months on end. Even if this had happened, it would have had no effect whatsoever on a virus transported in the air we breathe, and in the air all around us all of the time.

It seems to be some kind of middle-class fantasy that the outside world stopped turning in late March 2020. Whilst Charles and Arabella (both BBC executives) hunkered down for the duration, the electrical supply powering their Netflix binge-watching remained in perfect operation, courtesy of horny-handed men shinning up pylons.

Trinkets were delivered to their door by heavily accented men in vans. Food miraculously appeared on their local Waitrose shelves. Whatever their little hearts desired could by magicked up at the click of an iPhone button, after which the working-class scuttled and scurried their errands in a supposedly viral soup to ensure the middle class enjoyed a lockdown life of relaxed contentment.

Above the middle class came the political class who, as we now know, partied hard and partied often. And above them came the billionaire class, who jetted around the world whenever and wherever they wanted. It was really only the middle-class who salaciously locked down and narcissistically assumed the rest of the world locked down with them.

The most glaring example of the whole lockdown hypocrisy/uselessness could be found in the realm of supermarkets, where workers toiled away for the entirety of lockdown. Pretty much everyone went to a supermarket. Those who didn’t simply took advantage of home delivery via a man in a van who, of course, mixed with lots of people between supermarket pick-up to home delivery in upmarket suburbia.

Supermarket workers in the Western world were exposed to 80% plus of all local humanity thronging their stores. Supermarket workers were the ultimate Disease Control Group. Did thousands of them keel over and die from Covid-19? No, they did not. Did thousands of them become very ill? No, they did not.

Unlike the lockdowners, supermarket workers got plenty of exercise, sunshine and fresh air, all of which provide a good defence against viruses. As do Vitamins C/D and zinc. We were never told to make sure we had sufficient vitamins though. Instead, we were told to avoid exercise, sunshine and fresh air. This obvious and medically criminal lunacy should have set alarm bells ringing from the outset.

Continue reading

Annalena Baerbock Loves the Bad Guys

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from JournalistenWatch:

Baerbock brought Afghans who were on a “bad guys list” to Germany

Although they were on the secret threat lists, the so-called “bad guys” lists, of the Bundeswehr’s counterintelligence service, [Foreign Minister Annalena] Baerbock brought these dangerous Afghan characters to Germany with her admission program for former local staff.

In 2010, the Military Counterintelligence Service (MAD) placed suspected local staff from Afghanistan on a so-called “bad guys list.” The secret documents thus contain the names, personnel numbers and photographs of 97 former local staff who were dismissed without notice “for security reasons.”

However, according to authorities, a number of these Muslim threats from Afghanistan are currently in Hesse, North Rhine-Westphalia and Berlin. This is reported by the Bild newspaper (behind paywall). According to the newspaper, a spokesperson for the MAD made the following statement:

“For reasons of data protection and personal rights, we are not allowed to provide any information about the people or their backgrounds.”

“Bad Guys List” irrelevant for assessment under the Residence Act

Nevertheless, the MAD spokesman continued, the “bad guys list” did not serve “the purpose of an assessment under the Residence Act.” In other words, the Green Party’s verbal catastrophe Baerbock imported precisely these Islamic threats to Germany through her dangerous “reception program for former local employees.”

Mannheim killer with negative asylum decision

It is not only on social media that people agree that Baerbock is indirectly responsible for the death of the young police officer in Mannheim through her delusional policies. Perversely, after the murder of the young officer by one of her Afghan guests, the Green Party had nothing better to do than to call on the citizens of this broken country to oppose another horrific Islamic bloodbath through an “open discussion about migration”. Social media also believes that Baerbock and Co. must finally be held accountable for their bloody policies.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. — Chapter 5

Below is the fifth chapter in the serialization of Paul Weston’s book Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. Previously: Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4.

Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime.

by Paul Weston

Chapter 5: Matt Hancock’s Role

Ex-Health Secretary Matt Hancock suffers from dyslexia. He has trouble with words and numbers. Two words he should get very used to spelling and recognising are geronticide and democide. The former means the killing of the elderly. The latter, according to the Collins English Dictionary, means:

The killing of members of a country’s civilian population as a result of its government’s policy, including by direct action, indifference, and neglect.”

Hancock clearly suffers from a narcissistic personality disorder. He is also firmly aligned with Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum. In his tenure as British Health Secretary he was involved in various dubious instances where personal friends were awarded large government contracts for Covid-19 related procurements. And, of course, whilst he was telling us to lockdown and avoid all personal contact with others, he was carrying out an adulterous and very up-close and personal liaison with his squeeze Gina Coladangelo.

In the furore following the Coladangelo affair, Hancock was pushed out of the government’s inner circle and sought to rebuild his career by appearing on trash TV reality shows. Never has there been a man so unsuited to run a whelk stall, let alone oversee the government’s reaction to an allegedly unprecedented emergency.

Or at least “so unsuited” in normal times. 2020 was far from normal, however, so perhaps Hancock was engineered into his position as Health Secretary precisely because of his callous and cold-hearted inabilities, rather than despite them. After all, it takes a particularly wicked sort of human being to do the dirty work sometimes required by those who set the Globalist Agenda. Hancock was an absolute Godsend to those in need of immediate and large numbers of deaths.

In late 2020, Amnesty International issued a 54-page Report into the Great Care Home Cull. Amnesty didn’t go quite so far as to unequivocally state it was an exercise in mass murder, but it got very close to doing so by implication. Amnesty also called for a full government inquiry. To date, this has not happened. Nor has The Great Care Home Cull been forensically dissected in the ongoing governmental inquiry into the pandemic. In point of fact, both it and the Amnesty Report have been disappeared, vapourised, or Memory-Holed as Orwell might have put it.

Hancock is aware he is in some danger of prosecution for Democide. He has already stated he believes government officials should be indemnified against prosecution for deaths resulting from ministerial action taken during an international emergency. The problem he faces is that the deaths were caused only by government action as opposed to a viral pandemic.

Continue reading

Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. — Chapter 4

Below is the fourth chapter in the serialization of Paul Weston’s book Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. Previously: Chapters 1, 2, 3.

Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime.

by Paul Weston

Chapter 4: The Great Care Home Cull

If we can agree that a huge death toll was pretty much the inevitable consequence of government action in American and British Care Homes, it forces us into asking a number of questions. The first of which must be: was it deliberately and cold-bloodedly planned, or was it simply the result of government incompetence?

At the very outset of the Covid-19 emergency, Britain’s dead-eyed Chief Medical Officer, Chris Whitty, stated the Covid-19 virus was relatively innocuous for the young, the fit and the healthy, and only presented a risk of death to the very old and the very ill.

Matt Hancock, the British Health Secretary at the time, stated he would throw a “ring of steel” around Britain’s Care Homes. In a manner of speaking, he did just that, but only insofar as making it impossible for relatives of care home residents to breach the ring of steel in order to visit their aged loved ones.

Imagine the surreal levels of incompetence necessary to inadvertently slaughter tens-of-thousands of old and ill elderly residents of care homes, having implicitly stated only the old and ill were vulnerable, and that wherever they were, a defensive “ring of steel” would be erected around them.

It is very hard to believe it was simply a matter of incompetence. There are a number of issues which reinforce this belief. If you cast your mind back to April and May 2020, what was being shown 24/7 on the TV news and in the newspapers? What were we being told 24/7 by our politicians?

Answer: We were in the grip of a deadly pandemic. Thousands were dying. Hospitals were swamped with Covid-19 patients. Exhausted doctors and nurses were working around the clock “on the front lines” in the war against Covid. We were all vulnerable. We must stay at home. This message was hammered home for the entirety of 2020.

Were the hospitals swamped? Were thousands dying in our overwhelmed hospitals? The following graph suggests they were not:

As you can clearly see, acute and general bed occupancy plummeted in our hospitals during April and May 2020, even as the daily Covid-19 deaths reached hundreds and then thousands. So no, our hospitals were not overwhelmed. If our doctors and nurses were exhausted, it was only because so many of them are so fat and so unfit they were unable to keep up with the TikTok choreographer’s dance routine demands. If you think I am joking, just Google “Dancing Nurses” and weep.

Anyone who visited a hospital in post March 2020 knows they were virtually empty. Of course they were. All routine operations were cancelled. The only people “dying from Covid-19” in April and May 2020 were dying in the care homes, not the hospitals. And they were dying from loneliness, starvation and dehydration, not Covid-19.

Continue reading

“The Legitimization of Satanic Terrorism”


Santiago Abascal is the leader of the anti-immigration Vox party in Spain. The following video shows Mr. Abascal on the floor of Parliament upbraiding Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez for his recent decision to recognize a Palestinian state.

Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Nazis, Nazis, Everywhere!

Maximilian Krah is a member of the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany), and until recently was part of the party’s leadership. However, Mr. Krah was the victim of an outbreak of the Screaming Nazi Heeber-Jeebers (SNHJ), an affliction that is particularly likely to appear whenever a conservative German says something that deviates even slightly from the Narrative about 1939-1945.

The sin of the unfortunate former AfD leader sin was to say that not all members of the SS had been war criminals. Which is an entirely reasonable historical assertion; amongst all the thousands of men in the SS, there must have been a considerable number who never took part in any atrocities.

Alas for Maximilian Krah, historical accuracy was not enough to exonerate him during an outbreak of the SNHJ. He was forced out of the leadership of the AfD. That in its turn was not enough to save the party, however: the AfD was repudiated by those who should have been its best friends, namely the leaders of fellow European right-wing nationalist parties, beginning with Marine Le Pen of Rassemblement National.

Now Matteo Salvini of the Lega has piled on. Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit:

Agrees with Le Pen

Now Salvini is also turning away from the AfD

Now things are happening in rapid succession: After the French Rassemblement National, the Italian Lega is also turning away from the AfD following SS statements by Maximilian Krah. The party is in shambles.

Rome

Next bad news for the AfD: After the French Rassemblement National (RN), the right-wing Italian party Lega under party leader Matteo Salvini is now distancing itself. According to the Ansa news agency, the party’s delegation in the EU Parliament announced that it agreed with the RN on the question of further cooperation with the AfD. “Matteo Salvini and Marine Le Pen are in perfect agreement, as always.” (Il partito di Marine Le Pen rompe con l’Afd: non siederemo più con loro. La Lega: pieno accordo con la leader francese.)

The background is an interview with the AfD’s top candidate for the EU elections, Maximilian Krah, in an Italian newspaper. When asked by the Italian mass daily La Repubblica, he said that not every member of the SS was automatically a criminal. “I will never say that anyone who wore an SS uniform was automatically a criminal.” The SS carried out several massacres in France and Italy towards the end of the Second World War.

Salvini governs as a junior partner together with Giorgia Meloni and is Minister of Transport. He was actually considered a loyal ally of the AfD until now. According to Junge Freiheit‘s information, the party of Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla was not invited to a major rally of European right-wing parties by the Spanish Vox party over the weekend. The FPÖ has not yet publicly expressed solidarity with the AfD, either.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

All Your Gold Are Belong To Us

If there’s one thing that politicians are good at, it’s voting themselves salary increases. However, in the case of the German Bundestag, the raises occur without any need for voting, since the process has been automated.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Without voting

The parliamentary allowances of members of the Bundestag are increasing significantly

Members of the Bundestag can be happy: from July they will receive hundreds of euros more. Some people can be particularly happy. There will be no vote on the increase of the parliamentary allowance.

Berlin

The 734 members of the German Bundestag have received an increase in their diet. From July 1st, their gross compensation will increase to €11,227.20 per month, according to an announcement from the Bundestag Presidium. Accordingly, parliamentarians will receive €635.50 more — plus 6%.

Members of parliament with other tasks, such as Bundestag President Bärbel Bas (SPD), particularly benefit. As compensation for the extra effort, she receives another parliamentary allowances increase. Her five deputies — none of whom belong to the AfD — each receive half an additional parliamentary allowances increase.

Chairmen of committees receive 15% of the monthly €11,227.20. Members’ pension entitlements also increased. As a result of the adjustment, the Bundestag’s expenses will suddenly increase by at least half a million euros.

AfD is against increasing the parliamentary allowance [How dare they, these, these undemocratic racists?]

There was no vote on the parliamentary allowance increase. Since 2014, they have been rising annually with the nominal wage index. The automatic process saves parliamentarians from having to vote on their own wages.

But not all MPs agree with this. The AfD politician Stephan Brandner criticized the “enormous injection of money”. Every taxpayer must fight for a salary increase. His group wants to abolish automatism. “With us taking responsibility, this behavior will come to an end!” [And that’s the crux of the matter, that’s exactly why they want to ban the AfD, besides all the other skeletons they want to keep buried and out of sight while busily digging more mass graves for the natives.]

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

The Day(s) That Turkish President Erdogan Humiliated America

The following summary by David Boyajian recaps the events in D.C. seven years ago when Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s bodyguards roughed up American citizens. He also looks at the larger issue of the behavior of those same bodyguards on other occasions, both in the USA and elsewhere.


Turkish bodyguards attacking protesters, Washington DC, May 16 2017

The Day(s) That Turkish President Erdogan Humiliated America

by David Boyajian

Weak. Deceitful. Cowardly.

Those words describe America’s ongoing responses to the savage, unprovoked attack on peaceful protestors by Turkish President Erdogan’s security detail in Washington, DC.

It happened on Tuesday afternoon, May 16, 2017 following his meeting with President Trump.

Shortly after his motorcade arrived at the Turkish ambassador’s Sheridan Circle residence, where protestors had lawfully assembled across the street, Erdogan commanded his bodyguards to “attack, attack.

Breaking through police lines, they kicked, punched, and bloodied the protesters, including women. Other Turks, purportedly not in Erdogan’s entourage, did the same.

The motorcade then brutalized a female demonstrator on its way to the Turkish Embassy. Assaults on Americans continued there.

The day saw a minimum of eleven persons, some with severe injuries, transported to the hospital.

Among those set upon and injured: Two U.S. Diplomatic Security members, six Secret Service agents, and a DC police officer.

Turks Allowed to Escape

Turkish Ambassador Serdar Kilic promptly asked that the bodyguards not be detained.

Sure enough, some 90 minutes later, U.S. security released them and accompanied Erdogan’s caravan to Joint Base Andrews where they jetted off to Turkey.

It was the fastest “joint move and departure I’ve ever seen,” said one U.S. agent.

The administration let the Turkish bodyguards flee, allegedly because they had diplomatic immunity.

Indignation

Then, too late, came the indignation, such as:

  • The State Department expressed its “concern to the Turkish government in the strongest possible terms.”
  • The bodyguards should be “charged and prosecuted,” said a unanimous House resolution in June.

Astonishingly, Trump said nothing about the attack. Perhaps this was due to his and his associates’ close relationships with Turkey and Erdogan.

There was good news, though.

On August 29, 2017, a federal grand jury indicted 15 Turkish bodyguards on felony charges.

That suggested that releasing them had been a serious error.

But then came Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s disgraceful meeting with Erdogan in Ankara on February 15, 2018.

America Caves in to Turkey — Again

Tillerson ordered that no American translator, aide, or transcriber attend the meeting.

That violated State Department protocol and ensured that no American could witness what Tillerson would bargain away.

Just the day before, the Justice Department moved — surely not coincidentally — to drop its case against most of Erdogan’s bodyguards. Charges were dismissed eight days later. Apparently, the entire detail has since dodged U.S. justice.

Tillerson obviously struck a Faustian deal to let Turkey’s unhinged president and his thugs off the hook.

That betrayed the American security agents, police, and demonstrators whom the Turks had assaulted and injured. It also mocked the First Amendment’s freedoms of assembly and speech.

American credibility took a hit as Ankara got away — like so many times before and since — with its crimes.

Continue reading