What Role Models Did the Death Driver In Trier Have?

There is still no word on the ethnicity of the man who committed Tuesday’s deadly vehicular attack in the German city of Trier. If he’s anything other than a blond-haired blue-eyed neo-Nazi, any information about his religion or skin color will be postponed as long as possible.

The following article from Politically Incorrect wants to know what inspired him to commit the attack, regardless of his background. Many thanks to Gary Fouse for the translation:

Graffiti on concrete (barrier): “Thanks Merkel!”

What role models did the death driver in Trier have?

[Photo caption: In Heidelberg, unknown person(s) sprayed, “Thanks, Merkel” on a concrete barrier on Grossen Karlsplatz a few days ago.]

by Manfred W. Black

After the deadly driving rampage in the inner city of Trier, the responsible court has issued an arrest warrant for the driver. This is for multiple homicides, attempted homicide, and dangerous physical injury. The 51-year-old driver is said to have deliberately driven a high powered sport SUV into people in a pedestrian area on Tuesday while drunk. Five people died. In addition, 18 people were injured, six seriously.

Immediately there is talk of a German perpetrator

It is interesting that the media, right after the deadly driving attack became known, identified the perpetrator as “German”. Also heard directly after the attack was, “the investigators assumed that the driver “had nothing to do with any organized background.” That would mean no connection in this case with Islamic groups.

In other similar driving attacks or after bloody knife attacks, almost all media have attempted to conceal the nationality of the perpetrators as long as possible, or completely when it concerns a Muslim attacker. Many of them attackers scream unmistakably, “Allahu Akhbar” (God is greater) during their deadly acts. That is also often concealed.

The media like to obscure the exact identity of violent criminals when it concerns people officially designated as refugees. Obviously, the leftist journalists want to prevent people who “have lived here a long time” (Angela Merkel) from thinking about borderless refugee migration, which continues even in the more than serious Corona times for Germans.

In spite of Corona: The “Refugees” Migration goes on

In October 2020 alone there were 6,499 “protection-seekers” — with or without Corona — registered by the authorities. With that come thousands of migrants, who are brought into the country under “family re-unification” through “unaccompanied minor refugees,” for example.

It is also noticeable that after the deadly car attack in Trier, even national media reported that among the victims were migrants. Political secrecy no longer applies. The Hamburg Abendblatt specifically mentioned in its December 3 edition that among the dead victims were a father and his little daughter — both being of “Greek origin”.

Before mass migration there were no vehicular attacks

After the vehicular murder in Trier, no newspaper in the country dared to write that up to now “refugees” and other people “with a migration background” had carried out similar vehicular attacks in Western Europe. No mainstream media had the courage to recall the deadly “role models” from Berlin, Stockholm, Nice, or Melbourne — with more than 100 dead. “Role models” which the Trier perpetrator unfortunately copied.

Continue reading

The Great Divide

Back in August I reported on a dissident Episcopal congregation — of which I am a member — that has been meeting for unofficial Eucharist services at a private home. Even after Governor Ralph “Coonman” Northam partially relaxed his rules on religious gatherings, the bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Southern Virginia, in her infinite wisdom, issued a diocesan bull from her offices (which Dymphna used to refer to as the “Winter Palace”) that forbade churches under her purview to take normal communion, sing, use prayer books, drink coffee, or shake hands, for fear that congregants might succumb to the Wuhan Coronavirus and meet an untimely end.

These conditions were unacceptable to more than half the congregation. Our priest resigned, and we dissidents reconvened in the living room of one of our parishioners who has a baby grand piano, which our organist fortunately knows how to play.

We have been meeting there for more than four months, celebrating a full Eucharist, passing the Peace with handshakes and hugs, singing, and gathering afterwards in the adjacent dining room for lunch. Nobody wears a mask, and nobody is afraid. Those precious Sundays are a refreshing change from the COVID madness that seems to have taken over everywhere else.

What struck me during the conflict over these issues is the dichotomy that has developed between those who are afraid, and those who are not. The group that ratted us out to the bishop and forced the closure of the church — a minority — is afraid. They are deeply afraid. They are so afraid that staying home from church and avoiding any possibility of contamination was not enough for them; they had to make sure that the entire congregation endured the same regimen.

The group that meets for Eucharist in a private home is not afraid. We recognize that COVID-19 exists, and that some of us are at risk if we catch it. But we’re still not afraid. For whatever reason, the Coronamadness has not infected us.

Those people who live in fear seem to have forgotten these lines from the Suffrages that we recite during Morning and Evening Prayer:

V. Give peace, O Lord, in all the world;
R. For only in you can we live in safety.

They apparently believe that safety lies in masks, hand sanitizers, vaccines, Dr. Fauci, etc., rather than the Lord.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

As a matter of interest, the great divide between those who are afraid and those who are not coincides exactly with the political faultlines within our little church. Those who are afraid are all liberals, and voted for Joe Biden. Those who are not afraid voted for Donald Trump, with the possible exception of one person who is basically apolitical.

Continue reading

Silvia Sardone: The European Union is Just a Pathetic Concentration of Propaganda

Silvia Sardone is an Italian MEP for the Lega. Last week I posted a translated article that referred to remarks made by Ms. Sardone in the European Parliament. The following video shows her complete two-minute speech.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Soros: A Man with a Mission

The following thoughtful essay by the Hungarian writer Demeter Szilárd was immediately deleted almost everywhere it appeared. After 24 hours of publication the author was forced to delete his Facebook account.

Vadhajtasok.hu has preserved the original article. Many thanks to CrossWare for the translation:

Soros: A Man with a Mission

by Demeter Szilárd

Published on origo.hu, November 28, 2020
“Revoked” on November 29, 2020

I observe quite a few artists and intellectuals nearing to the end of their lives and looking back to their oeuvre, perceiving that they have been judged in the balance and found wanting; just moments after their deaths they would be forgotten — even by their biographers. Somehow, I can understand the frustration of these people. They have made bad choices and are now facing the consequences. Everybody is living their own lives, but — what is more important — as philosophers have said: everybody will die their own deaths.

Presumably George Soros is struggling with the same feelings. Just before the end of his life, he was hit by the truth of the commonplace wisdom: money does not bring happiness. One cannot bring his money with him to the opposite side of the river. The financial security of his family had been established long ago for several generations to come, so only one question remains for him: what will happen to George Soros once he ceases to exist? He is not talented as a writer; his philosophy is troubled and inconsistent. He is, however, smart enough to realize he is not a genius. This might be his greatest grief.

Standing in the doorway of death, George Soros is carving his own statue. He thinks of himself as a man with a mission. His mission: George Soros, the New Messiah. However, this mission is lacking a transcendent dimension. The god of George Soros is George Soros, incarnate and descended to our world in the form of George Soros.

He is moving his chess pieces on a global chessboard. Given that the key to his financial success is playing unfairly, no wonder he also keeps changing the rules in his assumed “world-saving” chess game to his own taste. He is the playmaker, the referee, the striker and the scoreboard clerk in one person.

We have seen enough of this type in the history of mankind. Those with enough money and power made themselves dictators; those lacking it, servants of the dictators. And all of them — without exception — wanted to reach the throne of eternity by climbing a mountain of the corpses of the victims of their own tyranny.

In today’s world, the path to the throne of Soros leads across our very bodies. Europe has became the gas chamber of George Soros. The toxic gas is flowing from the capsule of the “multicultural open society”, lethal to the European way of life, and we, the peoples of Europe are doomed to fight for the last gasps of breathable air treading and climbing over one another’s bodies.

Continue reading

Culture-Enriching Femicide

Mariana Harder-Kühnel is a member of the German Bundestag for the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany). In the following video she speaks on the floor of the Bundestag about the abuse and murder of women by migrants, addressing her remarks to feminists who protest about the “patriarchy” without ever mentioning the role that cultural enrichment plays in the increasing violence against women.

Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Three Girls Raided by the Corona Stasi

The following video gives an account of a police raid on three young ladies in an apartment in Bavaria. Evidently this was a COVID-related operation, and the girls’ “crime” was that people from three different households had gathered in a single domicile. It took a task force of twenty police officers to subdue these dangerous criminals.

It’s hard to tell for certain, because their faces are blurred, but I think the story is being told by at least two of the three victims of the raid.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Geert Wilders: “A Monster Called Islam”

Geert Wilders, the leader of the Party for Freedom (Partij voor de Vrijheid, PVV) in the Netherlands, recently spoke at a debate in the Tweede Kamer (lower house of the Dutch parliament) about freedom of speech, in the wake of the beheading of Samuel Paty in France. The video below shows excerpts from Mr. Wilders’ remarks.

Many thanks to C for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

The accompanying article from the RAIR Foundation:

Geert Wilders Slams Dutch PM: ‘You Have Imported a Monster Called Islam Into Our Country’

The Dutch House of Representatives held a debate on freedom of speech at the request of Party for Freedom (PVV) leader, Geert Wilders after the beheading of the French teacher Samuel Paty. Wilders slammed the open-borders policies of the Dutch Prime Minister, Mark Rutte for “importing a monster called Islam into our country, which has put our country in danger.”

Geert Wilders, who is thought of as, “The Donald Trump of The Netherlands”, opened the parliamentary debate with a summary of the islamic attacks and threats in recent weeks. He also addressed the call by Amsterdam’s imam, Yassin Elforkani, who just two weeks after the murder of Samuel Paty, began demanding the criminalization of insulting Mohammed. A petition was even launched by his fellow Imam, Ismail Abou Soumayyah insisting the government to adopt sharia blasphemy laws. The petition has currently been signed more than 125,000 times.

Once again, Wilders told the Dutch legislatures to enact his five point plan to tackle what he deems the biggest danger to their society,

“Islam is the poison of our society. We imported a sample. I’ve been warning about it for twenty years. How many more victims have to fall before the penny falls until we realize that this terrible Islam does not belong in the Netherlands?”

Wilders’ plan asks the government to; “recognize that Islam is a violent ideology”, close the borders, “dismantle institutions of Islam”, lock up and deport all muslims threatening violence — along with their sympathizers, and have schools and media “show Muhammad cartoons”.

The PVV leader sent a clear warning to sharia-adherent Muslims who refuse to assimilate into the Netherlands, leave he demanded — go to an Islamic country,

“for all the Muslims in the Netherlands who do not respect our freedom, our democracy, and our core values, who find the rules of the Quran more important than our secular laws….get out! Leave for an Islamic country. This is our country. Not your country, but our country. This is the Netherlands.”

Video transcript:

Continue reading

The Insanity That Resides in Germany Knows No Borders

Hellequin GB has translated three articles that are representative of the absolute lunacy of the German government’s multicultural policies.

First, from the blog Journalistenwatch:

It’s hard to believe, but we live in Germany: Unbelievers finance imam training with €44 million!

Berlin — The Islam strategists lead our gullible politicians with a nose-ring.

Federal Education Minister Anja Karliczek (CDU) has now, 20 years too late, complained about the pressure exerted by Muslim students and their parents on teachers, but the consequences are once again typical for this country that has been Islamized to the bone.

Karliczek’s chatter is really unbearable because it is completely naïve: “Apparently such incidents are no longer isolated cases. You have to be very vigilant here,” she told the Welt am Sonntag.

And further: “It’s about protecting our values and also helping our teachers.” The teachers need stronger support and offers of further training on how to behave in such conflicts. “You can’t just look at the students. Children only reflect what is said and experienced in their parents’ homes.”

And now comes the bang: The federal government will spend around €44 million on imam training by 2024 (i.e. predominantly from the unbelieving taxpayer):

“At the present time, well over 2,000 students are taught at seven universities. This is a very important cornerstone for ensuring that a cosmopolitan and tolerant Islam will be spread as widely as possible in Germany in the future.”

Incredible, isn’t it?

There is of course no evidence of what such a cosmopolitan and tolerant Islam should look like. There never will be. Because for this Karliczek would have to have the Koran rewritten.

The second article is from Politikstube:

Continue reading

The Traitor Class Has Sold Germany Out to Islam

Ditib, the Turkish-Islamic Union for Religious Affairs (Turkish: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı; German: Türkisch-Islamische Union der Anstalt für Religion), is the officially recognized organization representing Muslims in Germany. The German government is facing increasing criticism for partnering with Ditib, which is widely regarded as the lobbying arm within Germany of the Turkish government.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Politikstube:

Federal government must stop importing Ditib imams immediately

The State Secretary in the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Kerber, defended the cooperation with the German-Turkish mosque association Ditib a few hours before the meeting of the German Islam Conference on ARD.

Critics accuse Ditib of acting as an extended arm of the government in Ankara and of trying to bind the believers primarily to Turkey and not to Germany. Beatrix von Storch, deputy chairwoman of the AfD parliamentary group in the German Bundestag, explains on the occasion of the Seehofer speech at the opening of the German Islam Conference:

While the NZZ [Swiss newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung] criticized the ban on discussion of the Islamization of parallel societies in Germany just in time for the Islamic Conference, Seehofer continued to curry favor with Erdogan’s Islamist Ditib troop.”

Merkel’s interior minister is playing down the support of the Islamists by the federal government with the correct but nonsensical description of a ‘reasonable dialogue’ for the mainstream. Yet it is not a dialogue, but a submission to Erdogan’s Islamist expansion, which extends from the Christian Nagorno Karabakh to Neukölln in Berlin and Marxloh in Duisburg.

As in the French banlieues, young men with full beards and half- and even fully veiled women are increasingly shaping the streetscape in more and more cities. Political Islam, propagated by the Ditib and exported by Erdogan, suggesting sympathy for the Islamist murderer of teachers in France, is a danger to any free society — and must therefore be fought and pushed back. Before it’s too late.

France should be a warning to us.

The continued importation of Islamist Ditib imams is not an ‘enrichment of our democratic society’, as Seehofer put it, but a concrete danger, because they primarily serve to expand Islamic parallel societies.

An afterword from the translator:

The German government knows that for any totalitarian regime to succeed in the long term, it needs a populace with a mindset that has already lost its individuality centuries ago. What better mindset than the followers of the Ideology of Islam?

Hitler admired Islam. Napoleon did, too. But both failed because their people didn’t admire it, because they still had a spark of individualism.

So, just replace the old populace with a new one, those born slaves, who will commit any atrocity in the name of their warlord prophet. The perfect tool, blunt towards the ruler and sharp towards anyone who disagrees and gets in the way.

Infidels Must Not Show Cartoons!

A Dutch schoolteacher had to go into hiding after showing a cartoon in class.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from De Dagelijkse Standaard:

Teacher has to go into hiding because Islamist girls think that he displayed a Mohammed cartoon

It is unbelievable, but this happens in the Netherlands. In Rotterdam, to be precise.

It doesn’t get any worse than this. A Rotterdam teacher has to go into hiding because, according to a group of radicalized girls, he hung a cartoon of Mohammed in his classroom. They demanded he take away the cartoon, someone took photos, the images were posted… and the rest is history.

The photo has been widely shared on Instagram. … “If this isn’t removed very quickly,” writes one Instagram user, “then we’ll do something else.” According to the police, there are also online threats against the teacher. Meanwhile, there is a “substantial” digital investigation to hunt down the senders, says the police spokesperson.

Mind you, the photo was not a Mohammed cartoon, but a cartoon of a person with a Charlie Hebdo t-shirt, in which he is sticking his tongue out at a terrorist — a jihadist. The teacher tried to explain to “the girls” that it was not Mohammed, but they refused to listen to him. He had to be — and would be — censured

Tweet — Rosa Blommestijn:

It has come this far: A teacher has to go into hiding because he hung a Mohammed cartoon on the wall, and Islamist girls “demand” that it be removed. The showing of these cartoons in our free Western Netherlands is now becoming almost an act of resistance. How unbelievably sad.

NRC Tweet:

For five years a cartoon has hung on the wall of a classroom in Rotterdam. Monday students demand its removal. Now a teacher has gone into hiding.

Yesim Candan-YES tweet:

On the teacher gone into hiding. I expect a Rotterdam action and no support, blah, blah. The cheeky girls who are going to be suspended. There will be complaints against these girls. They need to know their place. Back to the loft.

Naturally, the chance this will happen is minimal. Because as the NRC reports:

Continue reading

Gerald Grosz: “Political Correctness Twists Reality Beyond Recognition”

Gerald Grosz is an Austrian politician for the BZÖ (Bündnis Zukunft Österreich, Alliance for the Future of Austria) and the FPÖ (Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs, Austrian Freedom Party). His rants have been featured here numerous times in the past few months, but the rhetoric in his two most recent talks has been more somber, focusing on last Monday’s deadly Islamic terror attack in Vienna.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for the translations, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling.

Video #1:

Video #2:

Video transcript #1:

Continue reading

Philippe de Villiers: “It is the Islamic Virus That We Must Make War Against”

Philippe de Villiers is a French author, historian, and former MEP. He is an anomaly in today’s France: an intellectual who is also a conservative Catholic. He’s been featured here a number of times in the past.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from Le Figaro:

Philippe de Villiers: “It is the Islamic virus that we must make war against”

FigaroVox/Tribune— Philippe de Villiers deplores the differential treatment between the coronavirus and the Islamic virus. To fight against the first, the government does not hesitate to put in place questionable exceptional measures, while concerning the second, which according to him is an actual invasive aggression, it refuses to take measures of war on the grounds it might kill liberty.

Both are out of control: The Covid and terrorism. Emmanuel Macron is lagging behind. He runs after the words, after the deaths, martial, powerless. The lexical field used since spring, “We are at war,” today seems like an utterance and an inappropriate term: The epidemic is still operating, and the terrorists as well. The idea that the country is not being governed and that the State is in the hands of a bunch of amateurs emerges in the heads of the distraught French people.

Failing to secure the national borders, we reinstitute the domestic border

The ineptitude of the authorities, forced to conduct two wars at the same time, emerges in the differential treatment of the two viruses. There is one that raises health security. To protect the population from this viral enemy, we have chosen to lock ourselves up, to make ourselves stay home. Failing to secure the national borders, we reinstitute the domestic border. We take freedom-killing measures, we flatten the economy, we tear away the connective tissue of industrial France, because we think that health protection is more important than all freedoms: Then we announce, in 15 days, by using the same war-like panoply, first the curfew— which is a nighttime confinement — then the confinement which is a daytime curfew, never used even in the 1940s.

Faced with the other virus, which for once, is a true invasive aggression, we refuse to implement measures of war on the grounds that they might be freedom-killing, and so, to the legal maniacs, subject to legal censure. Thus, we refrain from touching family reunification or the 500 Islamist mosques. We don’t recognize the fatal chain: Immigration is the breeding ground of terrorism. We refuse to respond to war with war, and allow the population to have their throats slit. In other words, on the one hand, without being encumbered by scruples, we take away our freedoms, in the name of health security. On the other hand, we dare not give ourselves the means of guaranteeing ourselves physical safety.

France has become the planetary crossroads of the assassins of civilization

The audacity of the government, when it is a matter of silencing us in the streets and inflicting boundaries on our daily lives, contrasts with the laxity practiced concerning the Islamists. We don’t touch our borders; we safeguard the right of asylum: France has become the planetary crossroads of the assassins of civilization.

Where does this differential treatment come from? Having had serious conversations with Emmanuel Macron on this subject, I can answer this question: The globalist culture of our elites — which permeates Macronia — has blossomed into a hedonism and individualism that have destroyed our immune defenses.

Continue reading

Restriction of Basic Rights in Germany

Hellequin GB sends this report on the latest erosion of basic civil liberties in Germany.

Restriction of basic rights — The change in the Infection Protection Act makes it possible

by Hellequin GB

Whoever has not grasped by now the fact that their freedoms and livelihoods are being utterly destroyed by those they “voted” for cannot be helped any longer. They’ve all dug their own graves, willingly, and now must lie down in them, because the government tells them to.

Giving up and selling your loved ones and future generations into BONDAGE is simply so much less bothersome than standing up to fight for your family, their freedom and their future.

The SPD and Union parliamentary groups have agreed on a revision of the Infection Protection Act in order to better safeguard the restrictions on fundamental rights and to withstand them in court.

The current paragraph 28 of the Infection Protection Act, which only regulates very local and time-limited measures in the event of epidemics, is to be expanded by paragraph 28a, which contains clear restrictions.

The Basic Law is no longer above all other laws?

This is how easy it is to undermine basic rights in the name of an allegedly dangerous pandemic and to manifest “authorizations” through arbitrary state decisions. Somehow reminiscent of 1933-45 perhaps?

Anyone who sleeps in a democracy wakes up in a dictatorship — and as Merkel said in a speech on June 16, 2005, on the 60th anniversary of the CDU in Berlin:

“We really have no legal right to democracy.”

Below are excerpts from the draft law — printed matter 19/23944 (PDF)

Section 28a Special protective measures to combat the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus

(1) Necessary protective measures within the meaning of Section 28 (1) sentence 1 can be used in the context of combating the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus for the duration of an epidemic situation of national scope according to Section 5 (1) sentence 1 by the German Bundestag in addition to Section 28 Paragraph 1 Clause 1 and 2 in particular.

Continue reading

Düsseldorf Covers Up

The German city of Düsseldorf has imposed a new rule requiring citizens to wear masks when in public, or face possible hefty fines.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Politikstube:

Muzzle compulsory in Düsseldorf — mask-refusers face a fine of up to €25,000

The madness knows no bounds: From today a mask is compulsory in almost the entire city of Düsseldorf. Anyone who does not “prescribe” the 0815 everyday rag, which is hardly suitable as mouth and nose protection against viruses, faces a fine of up to €25,000.

Only with drastic punishments can you take action against disobedience and demand obedience?

Do you want to make it difficult for citizens to breathe in fresh air and reduce oxygen saturation in the blood with an inhuman policy, the side effects of which seem to be secondary?

Is it actually primarily about the health of the people, or does the Corona Theater only serve to determine how far people can be obedient, and to dismantle democracy?

For the Corona-fearful rabbits with their random scraps of cloth, this punitive measure will be welcomed; for those who have woken up and for mask opponents, just another chicane and further senseless action.

Rheinische Post:

In Düsseldorf, due to the high number of new Corona infections, a mask is required from Wednesday in almost the entire city area.

The city administration announced this on Tuesday evening. Exceptions apply only to non-built-up areas such as green spaces. The obligation to wear a face and nose cover applies to pedestrians and other road users who are allowed to use sidewalks. Cyclists and motorists are excluded.

The background is that the number of new infections with the coronavirus in Düsseldorf has increased massively. The seven-day incidence has exceeded the limit of 200. The value indicates the number of new infections per 100,000 inhabitants in the last seven days, and is the most important indicator for the spread of the virus.

Anyone who violates the new mask requirement in Düsseldorf can be fined up to 25,000 euros. This is based on the general decree that the North Rhine-Westphalian state capital published on Tuesday evening. With reference to the Infection Protection Act, the order states that the willful or negligent omission of a mouth and nose cover “can be punished with a fine of up to twenty-five thousand euros”.

In NRW it has thus far cost €150 if, for example, you do not wear a mouth and nose cover on the bus.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading