Toxic Feminism

The following essay was written by the Swedish author Katerina Janouch. When she was a child in Czechoslovakia in the 1960s she was called Kateřina Janouchová, but her name was shortened when her family moved to Scandinavia.

Ms. Janouch has lived in Sweden since the 1970s. In addition to being an immigration-critic, she writes and gives presentations on relationships, addiction, kinship, parenting, cohabitation, and writing. She is the founder of Katerina Magasin.

Many thanks to LN for translating this op-ed from Insikt24:

Toxic feminism is crushing love

Is toxic feminism making relationships impossible?

That’s the opinion of author and debater Katerina Janouch.

I talk to a male friend who tells me about his latest attempt at a love affair. They are both in their thirties, an age when many people choose to start a family, and my friend is longing to become a father. The woman he met through mutual friends initially seemed level-headed, sensible and honest and is on the same emotional wavelength. But very soon it turns out that my friend had gotten himself into a veritable inferno, where he is just supposed to keep quiet while the woman dictates all the terms, and if he protests, he is told that he is an evil man who should be ashamed of his lack of respect. I wonder now what our society will evolve into if women behave like spoiled brats based on some kind of confused radical feminist credo?

My dear friend is just one example of men testifying lately that it seems to be more the rule than the exception that women go completely off the rails, blaming their emotional breakdowns on the fact that it is obviously the men’s fault, while at the same time making impossible demands on how men should behave for a relationship to even be feasible. Being kind, understanding and able to talk about feelings doesn’t go very far. Even the man who conforms and does exactly as the woman says can have a hell of a time. Why?

Well, because suddenly he may have accidentally adapted too much, and doesn’t understand that the woman needs a little “chewing resistance”. In his desire to please, he becomes a servile doormat, and these galoshes don’t fit when she whimsically decides she wants an independent hunk. The woman becomes like a child in a sandbox, unable to choose between a red or a blue spade, and breaks down in a hysterical fit that results in her hitting the person who tries to comfort her. The emotionally disturbed radical feminists seriously believe that they have the right to behave as badly as they want and yet never have to encounter a patrol. They rule, demand, whine, are mean and impossible, moody and unpredictable. They are unstable and believe that even women’s violence against men is men’s fault. They are happy to vent their hatred against the entire male sex while screaming at the top of their lungs if they themselves receive the slightest criticism. It’s safe to say that avid social media use hardly does them any favours when the slightest outburst gains hundreds of ‘likes’ and unctuous cheers, even if the conflict may be based on some unreasonable behaviour she herself has engaged in, and then subsequently received a backlash for.

Not only that. A year later she may find out that the sex that took place actually happened without her willing consent, and that therefore the man can be charged with some kind of negligent rape. Later on in the trial, she alone is listened to, because she “felt” something, and as long as it is a woman who feels, the feelings are absolutely true. The man has no voice at all, and although he presents undeniable facts pointing to reciprocity, he is treated like a pariah, and the verdict is in the woman’s favour. I wonder what man would want to expose himself to such risks? Many don’t. They have stopped dating. They are resentful, disillusioned and resigned, and actually start to dislike women.

The behavior can be likened to the left’s strange psychotic break we see now after the [Swedish general] election. After the socialists have destroyed all of Sweden, they now demand that the succeeding government clean up the mess in a few short months. A feminine, emotion-based behavior, where they also got a bunch of bitches, who usually bring a penis substitute with them when traveling by train. All logic and common sense is gone; what remains is a red-hot, hysterical, frothing-at-the-mouth Left, with whom it is impossible to have a normal discussion. Everything is everyone else’s fault, they themselves are victims, and despite their behavior leading to a veritable societal collapse, they refuse to take responsibility. Responsibility, by the way — they can’t even spell it. They are like toddlers who lack all forms of logic and consistent thinking. It actually scares the hell out of you, when you think about it and realise that these are grown-up people behaving in this way. No wonder Sweden has gone off the rails, having these types of individuals in important decision-making positions and in positions of strategic authority.

Continue reading

Wyrd Bið Ful Aræd Germania

The title of this post is a reference to the Old English saying Wyrd bið ful aræd, which means, roughly, “Fate is completely inescapable.” Bernard Cornwell prominently featured the phrase in his series of historical novels entitled The Saxon Chronicles.

The word wyrd has the same root as “weird” in the Scots idiom to dree one’s weird, which means to endure one’s fate.

The following essay looks ahead to 2023 as the year when the nation of Germany will have to dree its weird.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from

2023 Will Be a Fateful Year for Germany

Dear readers, another annus horribilis in and for Germany comes to an end in 2022, one which one does not know whether one should be glad to have survived, or whether one should prudently keep it in honourable memory — because that what lies ahead is only going to get worse.

The rapid intellectual and material loss of substance and prosperity goes hand in hand with a rapid erosion of trust in the honesty and competence of politics. And no one can say when this development will become hyper-critical, when it will become life-threatening in Germany. We can still try to sugarcoat things, flee into private life, close our eyes in Biedermeier denial to the approaching impacts — but firstly, as all pre-revolutionary epochs of history have shown, this self-deception only works for a short time, and secondly, we allow the established facts to pull us deeper into the abyss with each passing day. The price to pay for the coming catastrophe is pushed higher and higher. The escalations are progressing at all levels. At the same time it will be respice finem (the end), and the warning reference to the inevitable outcome of the development more and more hysterically frowned upon.

Only escalations

What am I talking about here, what exactly is being escalated? The answer: basically everything. Company deaths, economic flight, increasing migration of the remaining elites abroad. decline in education and level of vocational training. Mass immigration of unskilled and culturally alien people. Islamization. Excess mortality, vaccine damage. Inflation. Disappearance of the transportation infrastructure. Overuse of social systems. Public debt. Reduction of freedom and more and more regulation through prohibitions. Reduction of sovereignty through the transfer of legislative and legal powers to supranational bodies, which are then no longer democratically controlled. Prosecution and criminalization of critical opinions through increasingly “creative” censorship. And, and, and.

Does anyone seriously think all this could go on forever with no repercussions? Or will it end and change for the better by itself? You don’t wake up one morning and realize: Oops, suddenly there’s a dictatorship out there! Or: Whoa, the world is on fire! It’s creeping processes that carry us there — although since Corona, things have been more or less galloping.

Constructive pessimism

Anyone who accuses me here of cacophony, who calls for “optimism” in these times, who reproaches us for seeing and painting everything black and this constant calling out to Cassandra is just as frustrating as it promotes depression, I unfortunately have to reply: Wake up! Times are too serious to keep burying your head in the sand. Constructive pessimism is the optimism of our time. We’ve come to a point where everyone is either part of the solution or part of the problem.

Where silence and retreat into the apolitical are no longer options. In 2023, every individual is therefore encouraged to rebel, arouse, protest and make it clear within the scope of their individual possibilities in their environment that they are aware of the intentional ruin of their homeland and everything that is dear to us, and are no longer willing to watch. If this succeeds at least within a critical mass, then — and only then — the reversal process of healing can be initiated. This is certainly not to be expected from those who want destroy us. We don’t have much time left for that.

With this in mind, I wish you — in addition to personal happiness and health — a restless and alert year of 2023!

Daniel Matissek and the Ansage team

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

Clearing the Roadway

We’ve all seen the videos of activists from Extinction Rebellion and similar groups who glue themselves to roads, trains, walls, and works of art to protest governmental and corporate climate policies. Motorists in Germany had apparently had enough of all that nonsense, and forcibly removed the glued-on protesters.

It’s important to note that these pro-active citizens seemed to be “New Germans”. Perhaps “Germans who have been here longer” were unwilling to take the risks associated with unauthorized spontaneous actions.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Abrupt end of a roadblock

When migrants meet the “Last Generation”

During a road blockade by the group “Last Generation”, motorists, apparently migrants, do not hesitate. They pull the “climate stickers” off the road and insult them. With videos.


Motorists have executed vigilante justice and ended a “Last Generation” road blockade. A video that the organization itself published on Twitter yesterday shows angry men and a woman pulling the climate stickers from the road with little empathy.

Apparently and because of the accent, they were people with a migration background. They grabbed the extremists under the arms or by their waistbands and removed them from the crossroads with little squeamishness. Apparently shocked by the sharp tone and the determination of the drivers, including a DPD delivery man, the extremists were dragged to the side of the road.

“Last Generation”: “This is assault” [And what they are doing is what? What a bunch of hypocrites]

While the coerced scream: “We have to go to work! Get lost!” or “Get off!” or “We’ve got things to do!” The cameraman of the “Last Generation”: “That’s assault, stop it.” The video ends when a man approaches the end of the film and asks : “What, are you filming me?! Turn that off.”

Neither the video nor the introductory text makes it clear in which city the incident took place. According to lawyers, dragging these road-blockers away is not punishable, it falls under self-defence.

Afterword from the translator:

Well, s*** happens. They can be glad that the glue wasn’t so strong that their fingers were left behind on the tarmac. Also, the police should step back more often in such cases, since motorists solve the problem very quickly and effectively by the looks of it. Although I cannot really see many native Germans taking the law into their own hands to remove the trash, no matter what.

Buyer’s Remorse About the Vax

The following video shows a segment from a recent panel discussion on Bild TV in Germany. The panelists focus on the various ways the response to the Wuhan Coronavirus went wrong in Germany. One of them is a severe critic of the harms caused by the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate the effects of infection with Corona.

It must be noted that one of the other panelists seems likely to be a Deep State plant. I refer to Jan Schäfer, the professorial-looking fellow with the puce tie, who is the in-house political editor for Bild. At a superficial level, he appears to be aligned with the critics, sympathizing with the victims of the lockdowns and the vax. He even portrays himself as a victim to gain sympathy, all in order to inject one crucial thought into the mix: “No one could have known that at the time. Everyone who got vaccinated did so at their own risk.”

In other words, he was placed on the panel to do damage control on behalf of the Narrative. By subtle nudges he aims to mitigate popular discontent and help keep the globalist boxcar moving down the tracks to its unspeakable destination…

But those are just my paranoid thoughts. Don’t take them for fact.

Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Confession and Apology First, Then Amnesty

As most readers will know by now, a popular progressive writer named Emily Oster has called for a “pandemic amnesty” that would absolve the Coronafascists and vax-pushers of guilt for their actions in the past three years. As of this writing, she has found few sympathizers among the Purebloods and vax-skeptics.

Our Israeli correspondent MC sends his take on the proposed pandemic amnesty and related matters.

Confession and Apology First, Then Amnesty

by MC

We are not very good at holding our leaders to account, and even our direst enemy’s leaders mostly get away with it.

Yes, we hanged a few as a result of the Nuremberg trials, but it is always surprising how many Nazi murderers covered up their spots and became leaders of the German ‘recovery’ or the American/Russian space efforts.

The German hierarchy destroyed millions of Jews and Slavs, leaving the common German people to carry the can, some of whom had a probably only the vaguest idea of what was actually going on. One had to be very, very brave to put one’s head above the parapet.

We in the West assume that ‘we’ are the good guys, and maybe that was mostly correct some seventy years ago, but Stalin had due cause to be wary. The dealings between Dulles and Wolff, and possibly Kammler, led to a transfer of technology to the US, but what was the quid pro quo? We may never know.

But then, we have just been through much the same thing:

First they injected the elderly and they died alone.
But I was young and fit; I did not care.
Then they injected the care workers.
But I did not care; I was not in danger.
Then it was the military; they died by numbers.
But I did not wear a uniform.
Then the pilots dropped out of the sky.
But I do not fly.
But when my time came, I bared my arm lest I, too, be outcast.
Masked, distanced, locked down and finally, dead.

We have just lived through a ‘holocaust’, but this time it was not the bullets of the Sicherheitsdienst or the gas of the Schutzstaffel.

The Holocaust itself was preceded by Action T4, which had the object of removing many ‘useless’ eaters ( the disabled, the mentally ill). These became the lab rats: they were injected with things like phenol and potassium, or they were gassed with ‘experimental’ lethal gasses (mainly bottled carbon monoxide).

In mid-1939, Hitler authorised the creation of the Reich Committee for the Scientific Registering of Serious Hereditary and Congenital Illnesses (Reichsausschuss zur wissenschaftlichen Erfassung erb- und anlagebedingter schwerer Leiden) led by his physician, Karl Brandt, administered by Herbert Linden of the Interior Ministry, leader of German Red Cross Reichsarzt SS und Polizei Ernst-Robert Grawitz and SS-Oberführer Viktor Brack. Brandt and Bouhler were authorised to approve applications to kill children in relevant circumstances, though Bouhler left the details to subordinates such as Brack and SA-Oberführer Werner Blankenburg.

Extermination centres were established at six existing psychiatric hospitals: Bernburg, Brandenburg, Grafeneck, Hadamar, Hartheim, and Sonnenstein. One thousand children under the age of 17 were killed at the institutions Am Spiegelgrund and Gugging in Austria. They played a crucial role in developments leading to the Holocaust. As a related aspect of the “medical” and scientific basis of this programme, the Nazi doctors took thousands of brains from ‘euthanasia’ victims for research.

From August 1939, the Interior Ministry registered children with disabilities, requiring doctors and midwives to report all cases of newborns with severe disabilities; the ‘guardian’ consent element soon disappeared. Those to be killed were identified as “all children under three years of age in whom any of the following ‘serious hereditary diseases’ were ‘suspected’: idiocy and Down syndrome (especially when associated with blindness and deafness); microcephaly; hydrocephaly; malformations of all kinds, especially of limbs, head, and spinal column; and paralysis, including spastic conditions”. The reports were assessed by a panel of medical experts, of whom three were required to give their approval before a child could be killed.

The Ministry used deceit when dealing with parents or guardians, particularly in Catholic areas, where parents were generally uncooperative. Parents were told that their children were being sent to “Special Sections”, where they would receive improved treatment. The children sent to these centres were kept for “assessment” for a few weeks and then killed by injection of toxic chemicals, typically phenol; their deaths were recorded as “pneumonia”. Autopsies were usually performed and brain samples were taken to be used for “medical research”. Post mortem examinations apparently helped to ease the consciences of many of those involved, giving them the feeling that there was a genuine medical purpose to the killings. The most notorious of these institutions in Austria was Am Spiegelgrund, where from 1940 to 1945, 789 children were killed by lethal injection, gas poisoning and physical abuse. Children’s brains were preserved in jars of formaldehyde and stored in the basement of the clinic and in the private collection of Heinrich Gross, one of the institution’s directors, until 2001.

Rather than liken the Covid-19 turmoil to the Holocaust, which was an exercise in real race-hatred of both Jews and Slavs, I would compare it to Aktion T4 because of its targeting of social groups rather than racial groups, and for its high level of deceit where the victims were wrested away from loving families and killed, possibly for revenue. And the medical professions must, once again, carry the burden of guilt.

Continue reading

“Completely Ignoring Science and Medicine”

A Japanese scientist named Masanori Fukushima, a professor emeritus at Kyoto University, recently caused a major controversy when he appeared on television and upbraided the country’s medical establishment for its dishonesty and negligence concerning the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus. He particularly excoriated them for ignoring the evidence of serious adverse side effects, including death, from the vax.

Many thanks to El Inglés for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Evil or Stupid?

Last week, in one of our Skype groups, a non-American participant said:

I’ve seen this quote: “The US has two parties: the Evil Party and the Stupid Party.” Is it any wonder the stupid party is losing a** over teacup over and over again?

I replied:

I understand the sentiment, but it’s worse than that. The Republicans are also evil, but pretend to be stupid. They don’t need to win elections to reach their goals; they just need the system that rewards and enriches them to remain in place and stable. They get just as rich when they’re the opposition.

They have to pretend that they hold conservative principles and want to win elections, but it’s all a charade. Any Republican who intends to move up in the hierarchy has to forget all that. In the end, it’s about money and power and perks and getting laid (whether hookers, rent boys, or little kids).

All the rest of it is pretense.

It’s very demoralizing to realize what’s going on. But once you start seeing this stuff, you can’t go back to not seeing it.

It took me a long time to reach this cynical position. I wanted to believe that the Republican Party presented a viable opposition, and for many years I resisted the nagging sense that the whole thing was a charade. Even after I came to loathe Republicans, I still clung to the forlorn hope that the party could somehow overcome its deficiencies and mount a real challenge to Democrat hegemony.

The presidential elections of 2016 and 2020 were the final nails in the coffin of that hope. I meant it when I responded to my liberal friends who referred to me as a Republican:

“I’m NOT a Republican — I HATE Republicans! The only thing worse than a Republican is a Democrat!”

But now I’m not even sure that the Democrats are worse. After all, they don’t try to hide their true nature. They no longer pretend not to be Marxists. They’re fully up-front about wanting to raise taxes and increase spending. They make no bones about their intention to control our lives in minutest detail. They proudly wave the banners of racial discrimination and sexual perversion. What you see is what you get.

Republicans, on the other hand, pretend that they are conservatives, when they are just as enmeshed with the globalists and the international financiers that are ushering in the New World Order. And they pretend they want to win elections, but ever since 2016 we’ve been able to see that they really don’t. Right now the Republican establishment is simply committed to making sure that Donald Trump does not win another election, no matter what it does to their party. As long as the current power-sharing system remains intact, and they keep their places at the trough, the party that holds power is irrelevant.

It’s plain that Donald Trump is seen as the greatest threat to the existing system, and must be stopped at all costs.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

So how do the recent midterms fit into all this?

First of all, it’s completely clear that the voting systems are now fully rigged. The Democrats control the process in major urban centers, and have developed multiple interlocked strategies for generating the votes they need to put their candidates over the top in all races they deem significant.

Earnest Republican commentators are having a hard time with the results. They aren’t yet ready to see what is right in front of their eyes, so they take the midterm results at face value. This forces them to conclude that their fellow Americans are ignorant, uninformed, and unfathomably stupid. Which is depressing, so now they’re depressed (I’m thinking in particular of the gentlemen at Power Line). For some reason they aren’t able to grasp the fact that the system is rigged.

Continue reading

Marine Le Pen: “You Owe to the French People the Protection of the Law”

In the following video Marine Le Pen, who represents Rassemblement National (National Rally) in the French National Assembly, addresses the Assembly concerning the rape, torture, and murder of a 12-year-old girl named Lola by an illegal Algerian migrant whose deportation had been ordered. She directs her remarks at Prime Minister Élisabeth Borne.

Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Taking the Cross Out of Christmas

The following report from Belgium concerns the sale of crucifixes at the upcoming Christmas market in Strasbourg, France. Crucifixes are apparently banned from sale “with reservations”, meaning vaguely that their quality and appropriateness must be judged by the city council. There has been a big uproar over this provision.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from the Flemish portal ReactNieuws:

Block 4: Non-food products banned from sale with reservations. In yellow circle — crucifixes

Crucifixes forbidden at Strasbourg Christmas Market

by Hans de Groot
October 18, 2022

Next month, the annual traditional Christmas Market begins in Strasbourg, the French city in Alsace. It is the most important tourist event in the city and draws hundreds of thousands of visitors. That Strasbourg is French but was once a German city will certainly contribute to this.

The city leadership is in the hands of the Left, including the Greens, and thus, the warning finger is raised in the air, and the most absurd regulatory nonsense has been unloaded on the participants of the event. The merchants have just been sent an enormous list of “banned” products.

Christmas cards are no longer allowed because they are printed on paper, and thus, “bad for the climate”. The traditional French dish “tartiflette” (a kind of casserole with cheese and ham) is banned, but the Turkish snack “loukoum” is expressly welcome. In short, the expected green nonsense.

No crucifixes

But, to the surprise of just about everyone, a banned product also appears on the list: The crucifix. In other words, the Christian crucifix.

Here it appears that the woke crazies from the Left in Strasbourg have miscalculated because a storm of protest has arisen. Jokesters wonder aloud just what we are celebrating at Christmas, the birth of loukoum? And from the majority of the city council, it is announced that this “was not discussed”.

But even if this crazy ban is revoked, it is already clear where the Left wants to go: The erasure of every form of European identity in order to accommodate the repopulation. The repopulation is also on a fast track in Strasbourg: Of the 290,000 residents, there are now 60,000 with an immigrant background. The immigrant suburbs of Strasbourg are infamous no-go zones where, for example, every New Year’s Eve, hundreds of cars are set on fire.

The Silent War Against the Germans

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the news portal

The Silent War Against the Germans

It happened again: a Somali immigrant randomly stabbed young Germans. This time the victims were young men who were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Again, attempts will be made not to give the victims a face. It is the wrong victims that our Federal President Steinmeier is reluctant to commemorate, because he cannot indulge in his eternal cult of guilt and hold up the mirror to the majority of society that they have failed again. Last year in Würzburg the victims were German women; in Dresden they were homosexuals. The perpetrators were always said to be in an “exceptional psychological situation” and then everything quickly returned to business as usual. It will be the same again in Ludwigshafen.

And how does it continue? The next attack will not be long in coming. NRW [North Rhine-Westphalia] Interior Minister Herbert Reul (CDU) announced in August that in the first half of 2022 alone, no fewer than 7,131 “crimes involving stabbing weapons” were recorded — in this one federal state alone. That corresponds to thirteen attacks per day — not counting a considerable number of unreported cases. This trend will continue to increase with ongoing and currently exploding illegal immigration. It is only the most spectacular cases that make it into the mainstream media for a short time.

Concealed Facts

On the other hand, one can read every day everywhere in Germany, at least in the local media, about rape, serious physical injury and murder of those who “have been living here for a long time” by men who came to Germany supposedly “seeking protection” — these almost always belong to the Islamic culture. This is a fact that is either hushed up or put into perspective — and anyone who dares to state it openly is denounced as “Islamophobic” (the Islamists’ combat term), “right-wing” and “Nazi”, or more appropriately, accused as “servant” of certain “narratives”. No other people in the world deny crimes against their own citizens in a way comparable to the Germans.

Since Maria from Freiburg, Mia from Kandel and Susanne from Wiesbaden, hundreds if not thousands of victims have been added who rarely make it into the national press as so-called “individual cases”. They are women, homosexuals and also men: people who became accidental victims because so-called “refuge seekers”, who were able to get into Germany unchecked and unhindered, had destroyed their lives and those of their families. Merkel’s legacy is only just beginning to take effect.

Deafening silence

And those in politics? The silence is deafening. On the contrary, with the basic income one creates the next incentive to immigrate to the German social system. People are taken indiscriminately from Afghanistan, and countries like Greece and Italy also want to relieve the burden of “refugees” — as if the majority of them wouldn’t end up in Germany within a short time anyway. Those in government at the federal, state and local level believe that currying favor with Islamic values would soften the immigrants. In doing so, they criminally fail to recognize that many of them have not the slightest interest in the values that made our society the successful, peaceful and free country that Germany became after 1949 and that have distinguished us for decades.

On the contrary; they often reject them deeply, and every step back we take is understood not as a gesture of friendship but of weakness. Like the unlawful approval of the muezzin call, which is now calling out to everyone in the cathedral city of Cologne that there is “no god but Allah”. Ultimately, this is an order to all Muslims to spread their own faith among the so-called unbelievers — in extreme cases, in accordance with the Quran, even through violence.

Continue reading

“Since it Doesn’t Prevent Contagion, What Was the Vax For?”

Matteo Bassetti is an Italian virologist who has been a vigorous proponent of the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus. Back during the height of the vax fad he promoted the jab, and deprecated all alternative treatments.

He is also notorious for participating in a musical video last December in which he and two other pro-vax celebrities sang a little ditty called “Yes, yes vax” (Sì, sì vax) to the tune of “Jingle Bells”.

The following video features demonstrators who protested at one of Dr. Bassetti’s recent public appearances. Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

We’re Good Little Sheep

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this essay from The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

BA-A-A-A! We’re Doing So Well!

The comparison of the Germans with a flock of sheep may seem a bit overused by now — but it just fits again and again.

Another animal analogy would be the lesser-known ant gyroscope: the hard-working insects are almost blind and follow the scent trail of their fellow ants. Sometimes it happens that an ant wanders around in a circle without direction and all the others follow it. They do this to the point of deadly exhaustion, which can also be observed in our country — individual journalists and “influencers” with a wide reach are constantly going in circles on the subject of Corona or the Ukraine war without taking on any new impulses and do not even notice it. Or they realize it and keep repeating it until the average person believes them.

One such loop is to show our readers at every available opportunity how well off they are compared to residents of other countries. A pattern familiar to us from childhood days when we were denied a wish. Injustice gnaws at you, but authorities quickly make you realize how evil and selfish it is even to be unhappy. Parents could simply admit that they don’t have the money to make their wish come true, but they don’t want to let themselves down. Opinion-makers are even less willing to publicly admit how little they are inclined to take a self-critical look at their own ideas. Of course, they would rather bite off their tongues than give up their cancel-culture methods and control of public opinion — that would eventually render them ineffective. As paradoxical as it sounds: we are supposed to feel bad precisely because we feel bad. Stiff upper lip at all costs.

Anyone who has seen the Total Control Zone documentary will know how North Korea deals with dissidents of all kinds. The state controls every little thing, right down to the private sphere, so an overlooked speck of dust on the obligatory picture of Kim Jong Il is enough to send you to a labor camp, where torture and starvation are the order of the day. Of course you can’t compare it to Germany — but when the water around me is up to my waist, the thought of those who have already drowned calms me a little. Some dictatorships start with a bang — like the mullahs’ regime in Iran — while others creep up on us.

Devoured, skin and all

And since obedience tests can definitely be part of the program: can people give injections of dubious content if the state says so? Do they adhere to a mask requirement, even if it makes no sense at all in most places? If the answer is “Yes!”, then the first hurdle to totalitarianism has been cleared — and things will be a sure-fire success. Anyone who now even cautiously raises their finger and clears their throat suspiciously disrupts the process.

He can also affirm that he has nothing against voluntary vaccinations and wearing a mask, as long as he is left alone with it, but it will not do him any good. This is the case in all matters now. One can stand up for a reasonable level of migration, but warn against overloading our country with it, but it is not enough to free one from the accusation of racism. And whoever says that he considers Putin to be a villain who has done quite a few things wrong, but nevertheless proposes negotiations with him for the sake of reason. is his friend. When it comes to forming opinions, we are now being devoured skin and all. And unfortunately it works. Even with me, until a hearty “Wait a minute!” slows down my bad conscience again. No one who plunges himself into misery can do anything for others. We are funding Ukraine’s weapon systems that even our own Bundeswehr is not equipped with, such as the “Lisa” air defense system now. Although this at least makes more sense than “Tierpanzer (animal tank)” which are clearly offensive weapons. [Tierpanzer is one of Annalena Baerbock’s verbal inventive tanks.]

Continue reading

Cultural Appropriators Must Be Cancelled!

The prohibition against “cultural appropriation” seems to be in force now in Germany, just as it is on this side of the Atlantic.

The following report doesn’t mention it, but I would expect that “The Song of Hiawatha” by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow would have to be cancelled, too. Not only is it an epic poem about Injuns written by a honky, but it even uses the word “wigwam”! Which is almost too much for a sensitive soul to bear.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit:

Discussion about “cultural appropriation”

Dieter Hallervorden: That is patronization!


With biting irony, the actor and theater manager Dieter Hallervorden got involved in the debate about so-called “cultural appropriation”. Regarding the discussion about the Indian chief Winnetou created by the writer Karl May, the 86-year-old said: “I think we live in a kind of sensitivity cult where other people want to dictate to us which slalom we have to use to go around alleged blunders in the future.”

Hallervorden attacked the advocates of a prohibition culture harshly: “I take it as patronization,” said the director of the Berlin Schloßpark-Theater. Background: The Ravensburger publishing house stopped the delivery of two children’s books for the film of the same name, “The Young Chief Winnetou”, in mid-August. Because one is aware “that we have hurt the feelings of others with the Winnetou titles”.

Also ban Goethe’s “Faust”?

If one followed this logic, Goethe’s “Faust” would also have to be banned, Hallervorden averred. “Because the way Faust approaches Gretchen is not only outdated, but downright misogynistic.” And he said sarcastically of characters invented by Walt Disney such as Donald Duck: “Talking ducks — don’t you do a certain animal species a bitter wrong here?” He could only recommend that everyone not take the topic seriously and “have a great laugh about it.”

Afterword from the translator:

Dieter Hallervorden also criticized gendering last year , calling it the rape of the German language. I call all of this the rape of humanity.

Unfortunately, all of this is nothing new. Over 200 years ago the busybody crowd around Reverend William Wilberforce did the same. They even had Cinderella banned, among many other fairy tales, because the story painted stepmothers in a bad light, and fairy tales in general were thought to take people away from “Christian values”— needless to say, it was THEIR “Christian” values.

And now the same crowd is coming for Karl May, a 19th-century German writer of travel adventure novels, ALL of which I read while growing up. Reading his books growing up made me leave Germany and Europe and have my own adventures. Pity, though, my collection of his books burned along with my house back in 2015.

Murdering Somali Gets a Shrink Instead of the Clink

In June of last year a Somali culture-enricher waged jihad with a knife in the German city of Würzburg, killing three people and wounding six others (see the list at the bottom of this post for links to previous articles about the incident). Now the killer has had his day in court, and he won’t be doing any jail time because — surprise! — he’s mentally ill.

By the way: the report below erroneously translates “Allahu Akhbar” as “Allah is greater”, when any competent diversity coordinator could tell you that it means “I have been victimized by an oppressive racist and patriarchal society.”

Many thanks to Gary Fouse and Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit. Hellequin GB’s comments are in square brackets:

Judgment in the case of Abdirahman Jibril A.

Knife attack in Würzburg: Somali is not legally responsible


The district court of Würzburg found the Somali, who stabbed three women in the Bavarian city in June of 2021, not guilty and referred him to psychiatric treatment. “Anyone who acts without individual guilt must not be punished,” said the dpa news agency on Tuesday when the verdict was announced. “He was unable to see the wrong of his actions.” [Obviously you MORONS, because he’s a good Muslim and didn’t do ANYTHING wrong according to his belief system. He does exactly what Islamic Scripture commands him to do, which is 98% “Kill the Infidel”.]

The migrant Abdirahman Jibril A. was diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic by two independent reports. He has psychosis, hallucinates and hears voices that are said to have ordered him to attack with a knife on the day of the crime. [It’s called the Koran.] The court evaluated this as three counts of murder, five counts of attempted murder and five counts of attempted manslaughter.

The immigrant, who came to Germany in May 2015 without papers and claimed to be 18 years old, attacked passersby with a kitchen knife in downtown Würzburg at the end of June last year. He killed three women and seriously injured nine others.

The Würzburg assassin was known to the police

Shortly after the fact, there was much speculation about the motive. According to eyewitness reports, the Somali shouted “Allahu Akhbar” (“Allah is greater”) during the act. After his arrest, he testified that he had carried out his jihad, according to an internal official memo. [How much clearer can it get when the perp tells you the “WHY”? Also, it looks there weren’t enough Muslim eyewitnesses, only kafirs, and we know that their testimony does not count in a court of Sharia Law.]

The Würzburg assassin had been mentally disturbed for years. According to research by Spiegel, A. met a church migration advisor after moving from Chemnitz to Würzburg in September 2019. The Somali is said to have told him that he was being followed by the Secret Service.

Two weeks before the attack, the migrant stood in the middle of the traffic, forced a driver to stop and got into the car. The support center of the city of Würzburg took this incident as an opportunity to have the future murderer undergo a psychiatric examination. Two days later, the Somali committed the act of violence in the city center.

Continue reading