The video below is a German commentary on the UN migration pact that was originally posted on the channel “Ebola — Virale Lügen”. According to the commentator’s analysis, the pact was at least partially designed to retroactively provide legal cover for Chancellor Merkel’s opening of the borders in 2015, which otherwise was illegal under current EU laws.
Many thanks to Oz-Rita for the translation and subtitling:
Video transcript:
Martin Hebner is a member of the Bundestag for the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany). In the following video Mr. Hebner addresses questions to Chancellor Angela Merkel about the UN migration pact, which Germany signed last week in Marrakesh. In the back-and-forth of their exchange, Mrs. Merkel tacitly admits that the pact she signed is legally binding on the signatories once it is confirmed by the UN General Assembly.
Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
Video transcript:
Seneca III wrote this piece in anticipation that Prime Minister Theresa May would survive today’s no-confidence vote in Parliament, which she did.
The Mills of the Gods Grind Slowly, But They Do Grind Exceeding Fine
by Seneca III
RIP the Conservative Party. Born in its modern form out of the 1832 Reform Act under the guiding hand of Robert Peel it, in a fit of collective madness, suicided on the 12th of December 2018.
Having produced two of the greatest Prime Ministers of the modern era it became oblivious to the necessities of good governance, put its hand on its heart, felt its wallet then voted to sustain in office what is arguably the most treacherous, asinine Prime Minister of our time and long before.
Ashes to ashes, dust to dust it will be, because that is all it became fit for in the end.
Concurrently, the whole of this present (and recent) Parliament(s) is the most wretched collection of self-serving traitors, liars, unconvicted criminals, freeloaders, sexual deviants, washing machine salesmen and morally destitute poseurs assembled in the Palace of Westminster since 1653, and it is immaterial which way or how they vote, abstain, waffle, equivocate, delay and butt-cover hereafter. The United Kingdom will be neither united, a Kingdom nor sovereign and free any longer.
For over two years, month after month, day after day they have stood and pontificated, wallowing righteously in a sea of vacuous platitudes and imagined threats whilst dragging the House and this nation deeper into a Slough of Despond than even Bunyan could have imagined. Most of them cannot deliver a coherent speech without the use of copious notes, and even then their verbal incontinence (in the main, nothing more than rancid vomitus) is painful to the eye and ear of those who have steeled themselves to watch and listen.
History will record this collection of political dwarves as unfit for any purpose other than their own enrichment and the survival of themselves and their comrades in the Globalist International; they are totally without virtue and ridden with vice. My dog has more integrity and sense of patriotism than they; he would not refuse to address the grievances of his pack nor their will as expressed through a referendum, and would not sell them to the Euro-Globalists for thirty pieces of euros (or tins of dog food) and a seat at High Table in a canine Brussels or Socialist International.
Barely any of this two-legged “All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others” parliamentary rabble could lie straight on the rack, never mind present as anything resembling pillars of rectitude. Betrayal is their watchword, and the adulation of their acolytes and (EU) paymasters their bread of life. However, bear in mind that if May & Co sign us up to the UN Immigration Pact, as is looking more and more likely, then the whole Brexit debacle, however it turns out, will be of no long-term importance as Muslim psychopaths from all over the world together with feral sub-Saharan primitives will soon flood in to finish us off once and for all.
The following video is the second of two parts (part one is here) showing excerpts from a Green Youth rally in Germany in the summer of 2017, not long before the September elections.
Two leaders of the Green Party, Cem Ozdemir and Katrin Goering-Eckardt, were in attendance at the event. Their faces are circled in the screen cap above, as is a logo with the Antifa (“anti-fascist”) flag — the event seems to have been a joint enterprise for the Green Party and the Antifa groups.
Watching this video (and editing the transcript) was excruciating. MissPiggy said having to listen to it while translating was “like fingernails on a blackboard”.
I can imagine a special chamber in the inner region of Hell that looks like this venue: a dingy brick wall spray-painted with graffiti, the Antifa banner, and earnest speakers spouting the multicultural multigendered multimaniac Green ideology, on and on and on, FOREVER.
Sheesh.
Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
Video transcript:
The following video from French TV shows a panel discussion about the current crisis in France. The featured speaker, Christophe Couderc, represents the Yellow Vests (Gilets Jaunes).
Many thanks to Ava Lon for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
Video transcript:
Giorgia Meloni is the leader of the anti-immigration party Fratelli d’Italia (Brothers of Italy) and a member of the Italian Chamber of Deputies. In the following video she directs her remarks to Laura Boldrini, the former President of the Chamber of Deputies, about the UN migration pact (which has since been signed in Marrakesh, but not by Italy).
Many thanks to FouseSquawk for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
Video transcript:
As we mentioned last week, Anetta Kahane is a former Stasi operative who founded the Amadeu Antonio Foundation, which acts as an extra-governmental watchdog monitoring the ideological conformity of organizations and individual citizens in Germany.
The Amadeu Antonio Foundation has produced a brochure designed to help educators detect right-wing heresy among parents based on the appearance and habits of the children in their charge (see last Friday’s post “Braids Will Tell”).
The following video features an interview with Heinz Buschkowsky, whom long-time readers will remember from years ago, when he was the politically incorrect mayor of the Neukölln district of Berlin, one of the most culturally enriched neighborhoods in the country. Mr. Buschkowsky obviously hasn’t attended any mandatory re-education sessions since he left office.
Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
Video transcript:
In the following video from TV Libertés, a criminologist named Xavier Raufer explains the “Yellow Vest” phenomenon in the context of the French national character as manifested during violent uprisings that have erupted from time to time throughout the country’s history.
Many thanks to Oz-Rita for the translation and subtitling:
Video transcript:
Many thanks to Tania Groth for translating this article from Fria Tider:
The church committee voted yes to Islam: “Great for more people to meet the love of Allah”
During the church meeting in November, the Swedish Democrats’ (SD) critical motion to vote on the Islamic call for prayer was voted down, according to the Christian newspaper Dagen (The Day). Among the arguments of the other participants was the opportunity for more people to meet the “love of Allah”.
The church committee is the highest decision-making body of the Swedish Church.
Prior to the November meeting, the Swedish Democrats, who had 24 mandates, had suggested that the Church of Sweden should take a critical stance towards the Islamic call to prayer.
However, the motion was voted down by a large majority. 206 voted against [the Sweden Democrats] and 26 for [the call to prayer].
Among those who argued against the motion there were Artemis Lumarker from the Open Church, a nomination group within the Swedish Church.
“Imagine how amazing that more people can meet the love of Allah and God, and what we get out of the meeting with each other,” he said, according to Dagen, and also claimed that SD is trying to “dehumanize” other people.
The open church is working towards the “vision of an open church where all people are welcome”, they write on their website.
A number of people engaged in the discussion during the meeting.
On the one hand there was Aron Emilsson of the Swedish Democrats, who said that the Church of Sweden was renouncing its own faith by supporting the Islamic call to prayer. To do this should not be the task of the church, was his opinion.
His party colleague Camilla Berard Granström argued that Islam has spread more quickly with the help of the Swedish Church.
On the other hand, the Social Democrat Isak Öhrlund explained to Dagen, the church should be “a progressive and open force” in society, and therefore one should not be critical of a call to prayer.
The following speech was given on the occasion of the formation of a Jewish sub-group (if it were the EDL, it would be called a “division”) of the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany).
Oz-Rita, who translated and subtitled the video, includes this context:
In October, Michael Klonovsky, journalist, author and personal advisor to Alexander Gauland, leader of the AfD parliamentary group in the Bundestag, welcomed the foundation of the Federal Association “Jews in the AfD” with this witty, hard-hitting speech. It was given at the inaugural meeting of “Juden in der AfD” on 7 October 2018 in Wiesbaden, and published by the AfD Kompakt TV on 28 November 2018.
With the present average attention span this speech may be on the long side, but I think it is (apart from being witty and hard-hitting) also quite representative of the absurdity that we get from media/politics, i.e.: A German party welcomes a Jewish sub-branch in their ranks, and they are called (and so believed by the herd) to be the real Nazis. One of their leaders (Alice Weidel) was described publicly as a “NAZI SCHLAMPE / NAZI SLUT”; when she went to court, she lost. Even the “public Jewry” (Judenräte) agitate against the “Nazi AfD”.
While the speaker is not Jewish, he is married to a Russian Jewish pianist.
Video transcript:
Tomorrow morning (or rather, later this morning) there will be an important rally on Parliament Hill in Ottawa. Here’s what Vlad Tepes has to say about it:
Tomorrow morning on Parliament Hill, a last chance to voice opposition to Trudeau eliminating Canada as a nation state
The headline is not an exaggeration. It is a literal statement of fact.
Parliament Hill, Wellington St, Ottawa Canada
December 8th, at 10:00 AM for the French presentation and 11:00 for the English, which will include a speech by Maxime Bernier, leader of the closest thing we have to a libertarian party.
Be there or forever regret not at least doing this little bit to stop the end of Canada, and the Nation State as we know it.
Yes, its possible that a future leader may be able to undo this mess and get us out of the UN altogether, but the longer one waits and the worse things get, the more unfortunate the solutions tend to become. So make the effort when the effort is non-violent and using the tools of democracy.
The Amadeu Antonio Foundation functions in Germany as a rough equivalent to the Southern Poverty Law Center in the USA. It was founded by Anetta Kahane, a former Stasi agent who now acts as Angela Merkel’s chief ideological whip. Her foundation provides purportedly objective data to back up the political positions taken by the German government on immigration, globalism, gender roles, and other hot-button issues in the culture wars.
One of the services provided by Anetta Kahane is advice on how to identify and root out “right-wing extremists” from among the general population. The video below features testimony by a young woman who ran afoul of the cultural profiling supplied by Amadeu.
MissPiggy, who translated the video for subtitles, sends this excerpt from the guidelines about provided by the Amadeu Antonio Foundation (emphasis added):
Children from ethnic national families: In a daycare center, two siblings stand out who are particularly reserved and have little to share, e.g. from the weekend. So in the morning circle at the beginning of the week, they behave in a silent and passive way. At the same time, there are no so-called discipline problems; these children seem to be especially good. In addition, traditional gender roles in the educational styles are recognizable: The girl wears dresses and braids; they are taught at home how to do household chores; the boys are challenged to be strong physically and disciplined. Both often come to the facility in the morning after having already completed a 1.5km run.
Now the girl invites several other children from the kindergarten to the children’s birthday party. Some parents whose children are invited are aware of the parents’ belonging in extreme right-wing camaraderie and are worried about what might happen at the birthday party. At the same time they do not want to forbid their children to participate and thus to have the opportunity to be friends with the girl. They ask the educators for advice.
Now see what happened to this unfortunate (and not at all right-wing) young lady because of her braids. Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
Video transcript:
The video below contains the opening remarks made by Marine Le Pen on November 27 at a press conference about “The Marrakesh Pact, the Pandora’s Box of Migratory Submersion”.
The UN pact will be signed next week in Marrakesh by an ever-decreasing number of countries. At this point it is essentially an agreement by Britain, France, Germany, Canada, the Netherlands, Sweden, and a few other European countries to take in any and all third-world migrants who want to enter. Since the Schengen Agreement will allow those migrants to disperse to non-signatory European countries, the pact will have an effect on all of Western Europe. Mind you, the signatory countries are also the preferred destinations for migrants, generally speaking, so most of them will tend to stay in the Big Five.
This is a significant event for those unfortunate enough to live in the signatory states. Ms. Le Pen provides an invaluable summary of the major features of the pact, and describes the pernicious effect it will have on France and the rest of Europe.
Many thanks to Alain Wagner for the French transcript, to Nathalie for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
For those who read French, the (untimed) French-language transcript is below the English transcript.
Video transcript (English):
| 0:00 | On the 10th and 11th of December, in Marrakesh, Mr Macron will get ready to sign the | |
| 0:05 | United Nations Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. | |
| 0:10 | All this will take place in quasi-absolute silence, a silence you, the media, are maintaining | |
| 0:16 | with the exception of a disinformation campaign organised by the Quai D’Orsay (French Foreign Office), | |
| 0:20 | who are peddling the so-called “harmlessness” of the pact. | |
| 0:23 | This new silent betrayal of our nation signals the new step that our leaders have | |
| 0:27 | taken in the orchestrated submersion of our country. | |
| 0:31 | Those who promote it, driven as they are by a globalist ideology, have a pointless ambition | |
| 0:36 | to make migration a boon for all. | |
| 0:40 | Just as international law gives protective status to 25 million “refugees”, | |
| 0:45 | pro-immigration advocates intend to give a legal status to 225 million migrants | |
| 0:50 | whose journeys are now promoted, organised and protected by international law. | |
| 0:57 | So, what are the Compact’s principles? The text puts in place the first stepping-stone of a | |
| 1:01 | “Right to Migrate”, a right that would be recognised as a human right and | |
| 1:04 | which would be enforced by international law. | |
| 1:07 | The text includes an introductory statement, which makes no bones about its globalist beliefs | |
| 1:13 | and its full-on pro-immigration stance. | |
| 1:16 | In it migrations are presented as natural, as in, and I quote: “Migrations have been part | |
| 1:20 | of human experience since the beginning of human history and we acknowledge that, | |
| 1:24 | in the context of a global world, they bring prosperity, | |
| 1:28 | innovation and sustainable development.” | |
| 1:32 | There follow 23 objectives and the corresponding 137 concrete measures | |
| 1:35 | that the signatory countries must abide by. | |
| 1:38 | Four main ideas come to light in the 41-page document: | |
| 1:42 | 1) The active orchestration of global migrations by the signatories | |
| 1:47 | 2) The enforced pillaging of the host countries. | |
| 1:50 | 3) The institutionalisation of “parallel communities” via the institutionalisation of diasporas. | |
| 1:55 | 4) Pro-migrant propaganda and the criminalisation of those who would oppose immigration. | |
| 2:01 | First, it aims to encourage and organise global migrations, | |
| 2:06 | set up a global information network on possible migrations, | |
| 2:11 | develop legal immigration pathways, thus turning consulates into | |
| 2:14 | actual agencies for the management of migration routes and the settlement of migrants in our countries. | |
| 2:19 | It aims to provide assistance at all stages of their migration routes and facilitate | |
| 2:25 | their settlement into host countries by providing legal advice, customised financial aid | |
| 2:29 | and protection, especially within their own ethnic diaspora. It aims to | |
| 2:34 | facilitate access to rights and advice, and, it goes without saying, in their own language. | |
| 2:38 | It aims to facilitate family reunification, to balance the influx of immigrants | |
| 2:42 | against the demands of pro-migration business owners. To put in place the absolute right | |
| 2:46 | for minors — and may I remind everyone that France will refuse to verify their minority — | |
| 2:51 | to be given the right to settle in the name of the higher interest of the child. | |
| 2:55 | To ban all measures of administrative detention. To facilitate the regularisation | |
| 2:59 | of illegal immigrants. The second objective | |
| 3:03 | is to put into place the pillaging of the host countries, | |
| 3:07 | to implement the portability of social security benefits | |
| 3:10 | for those migrants who choose to leave the host countries. | |
| 3:14 | To support massive transfers of funds to the countries of origin | |
| 3:18 | To encourage salaried migrants to transfer the technologies they acquired | |
| 3:22 | in industrialised countries to businesses in their own countries of origin. | |
| 3:27 | To institutionalise the existence of parallel societies. | |
| 3:31 | It notably proposes to acknowledge the work of diasporas | |
| 3:34 | in the support of migrants and in defining | |
| 3:37 | and implementing immigration policies. What it comes down to, in violation of all the principles | |
| 3:41 | the French Republic stands for, is delivering the country into the hands of | |
| 3:44 | parallel societies of alien origin by granting diasporas, i.e. the communities of origin, | |
| 3:48 | full legal recognition, and then give them the means of public action | |
| 3:52 | and their own financial capacity such as the creation of investment funds for those diasporas. | |
| 3:59 | The third objective is to implement, in all signatory countries | |
| 4:04 | the criminalisation of all opponents of immigration. | |
| 4:07 | Their aim is, for instance, to promote the benefits of immigration via “sensitisation” | |
| 4:12 | and “education” of the news media… It is you who will get “reeducated”, so to speak… | |
| 4:19 | and via a reformatting of public opinion, starting in schools; | |
| 4:22 | a presentation document does not shy away from stating: | |
| 4:25 | “We must reframe the discourse on migration so that it no longer conveys misleading or | |
| 4:30 | skewed ideas and gives an exact picture of the importance of migration | |
| 4:35 | and the positive role it can have in the contemporary world.” | |
| 4:39 | The coarsest of all propaganda will be rolled out. | |
| 4:43 | And all the more, since they mean to implement the criminalisation of those who oppose immigration, | |
| 4:48 | especially during electoral campaigns. | |
| 4:51 | Fourthly, by signing the compact the country commits to an irreversible future. | |
| 4:57 | This pact was conceived as an important step towards a generalised global nomadism. | |
| 5:03 | Contrary to what the powers that be insist, those powers who would conceal its true significance, | |
| 5:08 | the pact has legal value and is legally binding on the signatories. | |
| 5:13 | Each and every paragraph begins with a statement which leaves no room for ambiguity: | |
| 5:17 | “We commit to…”. The signatory states agree to be summoned | |
| 5:22 | at different stages in the process to report on the measures they explicitly agreed to carry out. | |
| 5:28 | But, above all, the pact contains a binding commitment to the effect that the conditions | |
| 5:33 | of entry into the host countries cannot ever be altered. What this means is that | |
| 5:36 | the signatory countries put themselves under a binding interdiction never to redefine, | |
| 5:39 | and thus harden, their immigration policies. | |
| 5:42 | Not only is this compact legally binding, it allows no room to reverse those | |
| 5:46 | Policies, and blocks the signatory countries from ever restricting | |
| 5:50 | the conditions of entry into their lands. | |
| 5:54 | We now understand better why more and more countries have refused to sign | |
| 5:57 | this insane document. To date, they are Bulgaria, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Switzerland, | |
| 6:02 | Croatia, the USA, Israel and more recently Italy under Matteo Salvini… | |
| 6:07 | There are more, but off-hand I cannot remember them all. | |
| 6:10 | The French president, fossilised as he is in his obsolete ideological dogma, | |
| 6:16 | had nothing better to say than this: “It seems to me that the proposed solutions are | |
| 6:20 | in agreement with both European values and European interests.” | |
| 6:25 | The Rassemblement National [formerly FN] asks of the president of the Republic, who is on the verge | |
| 6:29 | of signing the Marrakesh compact with a glorious disregard for consequences, | |
| 6:33 | to renounce this act of betrayal. If this text were to be signed, | |
| 6:36 | let me make it clear that the Rassemblement National would fight each measure therein | |
| 6:40 | every inch of the way. And once the two main parties are no longer in power, we will | |
| 6:45 | view this document as a worthless piece of paper. | |
| 6:49 | Ladies and gentlemen, the objective of this press conference was to draw attention | |
| 6:57 | to a document which, once more, was totally ignored and was not commented upon, | |
| 7:02 | contrary to what happened in neighbouring countries, which saw a very lively and | |
| 7:10 | well-represented national debate. This was obviously the case in Belgium, | |
| 7:16 | and in the Netherlands, and of course in Italy. | |
| 7:22 | Do feel free to ask me any follow-up questions. |
The following video shows excerpts from a Green Youth rally in Germany in the summer of 2017, not long before the September elections. Two Green Party leaders, Cem Ozdemir and Katrin Goering-Eckardt, were in attendance. Their faces are circled in the screen-cap above. Also circled is a logo with the Antifa (“anti-fascist”) flag — the event was obviously a joint enterprise for the Green Party and the Antifa groups.
Listening to these people speak, it’s quite clear that “climate” is very much a postmodern religion. They speak with at least as much self-righteous zeal as the most fervent evangelical preacher.
And it’s not just that they’re true believers, but also that they’re earnestly convinced that they know best for everyone; that they must force everybody else to do or not do certain things. Implicit in that belief is the demand that if others can’t easily be made to do what their climate religion requires, then stern muscular well-armed men must be delegated the job of MAKING them obey. And if that fails, well, the stubborn unbelievers will just be quietly eliminated from society, for the good of us all.
In other words, it’s just like Islam.
MissPiggy, who translated the video for subtitles, notes which parts she left out when she made the excerpts:
I cut out all the other stuff they want: free contraception, legalized pot, and what the younger ones said about the police. Then Cem Ozdemir had to retort about how the police are actually good (damage control).
Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
Video transcript: