A Small Country Far Away

Our Israeli correspondent MC sends an update from Sderot, preceded by a reflection on the history of appeasement.


British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain shakes hands with German Chancellor Adolf Hitler in Munich, September 1938

A Small Country Far Away

by MC

Most people who are blind to Hamas’ atrocities probably think along the lines of Israel being “a small nation, far away”, with little understanding that Hamas is only as far away as the nearest CAIR or Muslim Council office. When Chamberlain waved his piece of paper in 1938, everybody (except the Czechs) heaved a sigh of relief.

What the world did not understand was that the Nazis (and all other socialists) are liars, and deceit is part and parcel of being a social humanist as well as being an Islamist.

Lying is a natural way of life. One reason the Ten Commandments were so revolutionary was that they forbade both ‘false witness’ and murder.

A corollary to the Ten Commandments and Torah is that every word and action that we take adds to or changes Creation and thus can we be judged at the appropriate time.

Kibbutz Beeri was a ‘socialist’ kibbutz as kibbutzim go, but Hamas is no respecter of any Western political nuances. The ‘useful idiots’ are always disposable once they become ‘useless idiots’, maybe even dangerous idiots, because they think they are deserving of rewards and privileges.

Both Communism and Nazism had the tendency to make that reward a bullet in the back of the neck…

Jews have been with us for some thousands of years. Thus there must be something unique behind Jewish culture. Those who do not believe that God is behind that culture should appreciate that there must be something special at the root of Judaism that makes it so persistent.

Secular humanists should take note: Socialism failed in France and turned to mass murder. It failed in Russia and turned to mass murder. It failed in Germany and turned to mass murder. Same with Cambodia and Cuba. Chinese communism resorted to mass murder even before firmly in power.

Is there a noticeable trend here? One would think not, judging by the avidity with which people try to repeat the socialist ‘experiment’ and hope for different results.

But Islam is probably the biggest mass slaughterer of all time, and we call it a “Religion of Peace”. Is this existential irony a part of that same insanity?

Those Ivy League universities which allow the persecution of Jews because woke-fake propaganda says that Jews are colonialists and settlers should read the real history of Israel and the Jews. The idea of the modern “Jewish Homeland” entered international law with the San Remo treaty in 1922. This treaty was included in the United Nations Charter under article 80, so EVERY signatory of the United Nations Charter accepted that Israel has the right to exist.

Gaza and “Judea and Samaria” were illegally occupied by Egypt and Jordan respectively when the world left Israel to the wolves and vultures in the 1948 War of Independence, when the Arab world tried to continue the work of the Holocaust, but were beaten back.

There has always been Jewish occupation of the land. If you dig a hole in Israel you find mainly Jewish, but also Roman, Philistine or Canaanite remains, but not ‘Palestinian’, because the current iteration of ‘Palestine’ was only invented in 1963.

Continue reading

Time For Those Wonderful Global Partnerships

Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, made some inspirational remarks this week in Davos. She sees the WEF’s primary task as the suppression of free speech, although she expresses it somewhat differently: fighting “misinformation and disinformation.”

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Apollo News. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

At the WEF

Von der Leyen: Our biggest enemy is disinformation [says the Queen of “safe and effective” disinformation]

The biggest challenge of our time is disinformation, says Ursula von der Leyen at the World Economic Forum. Conflicts can only arise from this, said the CDU politician. It is time for global partnerships, “and we can do it,” (“wir schaffen das”) says von der Leyen.

This year’s World Economic Forum in Davos (WEF) wants to “build trust” again — that is the motto of the meeting, which is also attended by EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. On Tuesday, the CDU politician presented what she considers to be the most important factors for the next few years, quoting the WEF’s annual report almost verbatim. Her speech should also have the motto “Building trust,” or at least that’s what she says. “And I believe we can do it,” assures the former Federal Defense and Federal Minister for Family Affairs. [The only reason these people build up trust is so that they can push the dagger into people’s backs more forcefully and deeper.]

The most crucial issues in the coming years, according to von der Leyen, are “not conflicts or the climate” — she avoids the term “change” here; by now everyone should know what “climate” is aimed at — but “disinformation and misinformation.”

The 65-year-old also believes that “polarization in our societies” is a big problem and that “changes in demographics” also make global coexistence more difficult [Really? Then why do you want even more demographic changes and refuse to deport those who are criminals out of Europe?]. These risk factors also give rise to “geopolitical conflicts” and global disputes. Above all, as von der Leyen says specifically, this “impacts supply chains.” [A toddler in his or her first week in kindergarten could have told her that. What a lying harpy.]

Because the world’s situation is more dire than it has been for decades, the motto of this year’s WEF is all the more important: “Rebuild trust,” the EU politician emphasizes stoically. Because we would not live in a time of polarization, but should “build trust,” she repeats again and again.

“It is time for global partnerships, more than ever before. That’s why we need immediate and structured answers to the global challenges,” von der Leyen warns again and adds the sentence mentioned at the beginning, “I think we can do it,” with a diplomatic smile. We are familiar with quick decisions and “we can do it” slogans from another Christian Democrat.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

“Davos is the Representation of the Devil”

In the following video, Vicente Montesinos (whose website is Adoración y Liberación) discusses the blessings heaped by Pope Francis upon the World Economic Forum, globalism, and everyone attending the current gathering in Davos. Mr. Montesinos finds himself, shall we say, in disagreement with the Holy Father — whom he views as neither holy nor fatherly. He refers to Bergoglio as the “chaplain of the United Nations”

Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Hamas and the Annihilation of the Jews

Below is MC’s latest update from Sderot, with an extensive preface about the nature and history of Hamas.


‘Hamas, Hamas, all Jews to the gas’

Hamas and the Annihilation of the Jews

by MC

Hamas is a ‘brotherhood’ that seeks solely to kill Jews, as commanded by Islamic scripture: Koran, Hadith and Sunna. Whilst parts of the Koran may condemn murder, these parts are usually from the Mecca period, and thus often quoted to the infidel as a claim to innocence and peaceful intention, but are abrogated in favour of the violence of the Medina period.

Like calling Jews ‘Christ-killers’ (as happened to me just a few years ago), Muslims are very aware that Mohammad was fatally poisoned by one of his captured Jewish sex slaves.

In the Mecca period, the ‘holy land’ was acknowledged as Jewish. In the Medina period the good Muslim was instructed to behead all Jews and Christians.

Abrogation is a device used in Islam to iron out the many contradictions in the Koran, which is an incredibly confusing document and gives rise to at least four schools of interpretation. Sufism is the least violent, and it is this that the Sunni and Shia will use to convey peaceful religious doctrines to the enemy whilst planning his more violent demise.

Islam is not a religion as we in the West understand religion. It is a tyrannical form of theocratic government more akin to a 20th-century dictatorship. Life is not sacred in Islam, and the ends justify the means (amorality). Haj Amin al-Husseini and Hassan al-Banna, the founders of the PLO/Hamas, were indeed acolytes of Adolf Hitler, and later fell into the Marx/Lenin/Stalin camp of the Communist International.


The top leaders of these organisations trained under KGB supervision. They are anti-Israel and anti-American, but will happily accept the American taxpayer’s gold.

Hamas (and Gaza) are entirely financed from outside the country. It has taken 7th October to expose the deep, deep Jew-hatred that motivates states such as Spain, Norway, the UK and Belgium to readily finance the extermination of Jooz. These states say that they do not want to be seen as anti-Jew, but their actions towards the Jewish State of Israel are reprehensible and probably driven by their Globalist/Satanic desire to remove Torah from the scenario.

The US Administration, too, says one thing, but does another. O’Biden supposedly supports Israel’s right to defend itself, but is at the same time making sure that Israel cannot win. He has started three wars on his watch: Ukraine by embargoing Nordstream 2, Israel by donating $6 billion to Iran, and Guyana by removing sanctions from Venezuela.

Only Israel gets loaded with responsibility for ‘civilian casualties’. Collateral damage in the US-led bombing of Zagreb were swept under the carpet. Where are the howls of rage as Hamas fighters violate Jewish women and children, violate the Helsinki accords, and destroy agricultural property?

Hamas uses its citizens (and ours) as human shields. By law this becomes their crime and their responsibility — except when fighting Jooz, it seems. In the Koranic context this is ‘ethical’, and thus in a multicultural society must be given the same credibility as Judeo-Christian values, if not more, because Judeo-Christian value are those of the dreaded white male supremacy context.

Continue reading

Sympathy for the Devil — HAMAS

The following report by Clare Lopez was published earlier this month by Sharia TipSheet.

Sympathy for the Devil — HAMAS

by Clare M. Lopez

Although the Biden administration continues publicly to declare its firm support for Israel and its right to defend itself against HAMAS, behind the scenes there are reports that what the Biden team really wants is for Israel to finish its war in Gaza as quickly as possible and with as few civilian casualties as possible… even if that means that HAMAS and its leadership survive.

More indicators of anti-Israel bias among Biden administration officials:

  • Senior CIA official posted pro-Palestinian propaganda on social media” at Jewish News Syndicate, November 29, 2023
  • Interestingly, this CIA official is reported to have posted support for the International Crisis Group (ICG), the Washington, D.C. think tank formerly headed by Robert Malley, the now-suspended Biden admin envoy to the Vienna Iran nuclear talks. Others at the ICG (although not necessarily this official) were recruited by Malley to the Iran Experts Initiative, an Iranian regime influence operation deeply embedded inside the U.S. national security community.

Over at the Department of Veterans Affairs, an appellate attorney in the Office of the General Counsel posted a video on social media in which she appeared to mock Israel’s anguish over its people held hostage by HAMAS:

Meanwhile, members of the Democrat Party’s ‘Jihad Squad’ have come under fire for remarks that seem to diminish the horror of HAMAS atrocities, especially against Israeli women:

  • ‘Squad’ member grilled by fellow Dems for criticizing Israel when asked about Hamas rapes” by Ray Lewis at 10 WJAR, December 4, 2023

Here is an exposé on the Muslim Brotherhood Imam at the ADAMS Center who’s been a favorite of multiple US Presidents at Inaugural and National Prayer Days for many years. President Joe Biden even appointed him to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom in 2022. His term doesn’t expire until May 2024:

Continue reading

International Law or Sordid Double Standards

As the bloody conflict in Gaza rages, the more important war is the propaganda war, which Hamas is handily winning, thanks to the help of Western progressives, especially in the universities. Our Israeli correspondent MC sends his observations on these grim events.

International Law or Sordid Double Standards

by MC

Nobody applies ‘international laws, rules and standards’ to Hamas, and we must ask ourselves: Why not?

The first obvious answer is that Hamas is a terrorist group and just does not care about ‘infidel’ morality. Their standards are defined in the Koran, the Sunnah and the Hadith, not in anything coming out of Geneva.

In Europe prior to the Treaty of Westphalia, the whole of the continent was torn apart by religions which were, in fact, political entities, and which recognized no national boundaries. For each religious sect, Catholic and Protestant alike, the ends — i.e. absolute power over the other — justified the means used to get it. Forget do as you would be done by.

That had to stop, and the religious zeal (and personal ambition) eventually had to be tempered by biblical imperatives to ‘love your enemies’. In Christianity the central character was truly a man of peace. Trying to justify a barbaric war of mass extermination against another ‘Christian’ sect proved to be impossible, and the men of conscience finally prevailed.

Thus “Jaw Jaw, not War War” became important.

The wars of the 20th century dictators followed. WW1 was a war of trenches, machine guns and artillery, with a an act of gross stupidity at its beginning. Not so much the assassination of Arch Duke Franz Ferdinand, but the follow-up assumption that the Serbian government did it, and the terrible ultimatum issued by Austria-Hungary on the assumption of said ‘guilt’.

The WW2 was the result of the Central Powers failing to learn the lessons of the first war. The Nazis combined a sense of victimhood and resentment arising from WW1 with a schadenfreude of an immortal, undefeatable mythological Volk proclaiming the Germanic people’s right to rule, enslave, occupy and exterminate. To generally play god…

But Islam does not go by Christian norms, and the separation of mosque and state is not even contemplated.

Many people do not believe that the events of 7th October actually took place. I do; I was there. I heard the massacre in Sderot and I saw the aftermath. My son was about three minutes behind the pickup trucks loaded with AK-shooting terrorists.

He was in shock for a week.

Many blame nationalism for WW2, and have striven ever since for globalist socialism based on Marxist principles. But what if the ‘nationalism’ in National Socialism was actually benign, and that it was the ‘socialism’ part that caused all the problems and the huge death toll? It is only then we can suddenly understand that global Marxism is a catastrophe of epic proportions and that the utopia it is meant to bring is nothing but a cruel and impossible pipe dream.

Continue reading

Giorgia Meloni: “We Want to Fight the Mafia in All Its Forms”

In the following video, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni addresses the United Nations on the need to combat human trafficking, especially for sexual slavery.

Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Subsidizing Our Own Demise and Other Disturbing Mollycoddling

The following report by Clare Lopez was published earlier this month by Sharia TipSheet.

Subsidizing Our Own Demise and Other Disturbing Mollycoddling

by Clare M. Lopez

“Maryland Legislators Boast of Securing Taxpayer Funding for Hostile Turkish Regime Institution” by Sam Westrop at Focus on Western Islamism, August 9, 2023

  • You read that right: U.S. taxpayer dollars are set to flow to The Diyanet Center of America, thanks to the Department of Homeland Security’s ‘Nonprofit Security Grant Program’. What’s important to note here is that the Diyanet (or “Directorate of Religious Affairs in Turkey”) is an official Turkish government institution whose sprawling Lanham, MD facility is Turkish government property. It is the Washington DC Metro area hub for Turkey’s Muslim Brotherhood regime collaboration with the ADAMS Center (All Dulles Area Muslim Society Center), located near Dulles Airport in Northern Virginia. The ADAMS Center is headed by senior Muslim Brotherhood imam and former president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), Mohamed Magid, who is the son of Sudan’s former Grand Mufti. In 2022, Magid was appointed by the Biden White House to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom. This is not ‘Islamism’. This is U.S. Federal Government-funded jihad.

Ilhan Omar Met With Al Qaeda Allies on Trip Funded by Islamic Terror States” by Daniel Greenfield at Front Page Magazine, August 24, 2023

  • “Ilhan Omar, who decried Israeli money in US politics, got free World Cup trip from Muslim Brotherhood-linked Qatar” by Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch, August 17, 2023
  • “Ilhan Omar’s Excellent Adventure In Qatar” by Hugh Fitzgerald at Jihad Watch, August 19, 2023
  • “For Ilhan Omar, not all foreign influence spending is bad” by Matthew Kassel at Jewish Insider, August 16, 2023
  • In November 2022, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) attended the World Cup in Qatar. Annual House financial disclosure forms filed in May 2023 now show that her trip was paid for by Qatar, one of the top supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood in the world and funder for both HAMAS and Hizballah. Omar also visited The Islamic Republic of Pakistan in April 2022, a trip paid for by the al-Qa’eda-and-Taliban-linked Pakistani government. Conveniently for her, House rules under the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act permit Members to take trips funded by foreign governments, even hostile ones like Qatar and Pakistan, provided they disclose that information on their annual financial statements. Omar, a member of the so-called “Squad” in the House is one of the most antisemitic, anti-Israel Members of Congress.

“Crocodile Tears from Jailed Muslim Brotherhood Cleric Earns Sympathy from Congress” by Benjamin Baird at Focus on Western Islamism, August 18, 2023

  • Senator Ben Cardin (D-MD) has fallen for Islamic crocodile tears from Salah Soltan, a former legal resident of the U.S., who relocated to Egypt during the 2011-2012 Islamic Uprising (sometimes still called the “Arab Spring”) and was convicted on charges including terrorism, murder, and use of explosives. Soltan is serving a life sentence in Egyptian prison, but recently penned a letter expressing supposed remorse for “the error of his ways”. Cardin and other Democratic colleagues have been urging that U.S. military aid to Egypt be conditioned on Soltan’s release from prison. None of them have taken note of Soltan’s vicious antisemitism or close support for the Muslim Brotherhood. Soltan is not an “Islamist”. He’s a devout, faithful, practicing Muslim jihadi.

“Milley: Islamic State’s ‘ideology is not yet dead,’ so US will be in Syria for ‘many many years and decades to come’” by Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch, August 27, 2023

Continue reading

Paul Weston: “Question Everything”

After an extended sabbatical — during which he decamped from Blighty and set up camp at an undisclosed location abroad — Paul Weston returns with this video about the Rainbow Curtain of Science that is now descending over the entire West and ushering in our totalitarian future:

Biden Pretzel Logic: ‘We Must Embrace Antisemites to Fight Antisemites’

The following report by Clare Lopez was published earlier this month by Sharia TipSheet.

Biden Pretzel Logic: ‘We Must Embrace Antisemites to Fight Antisemites’

by Clare M. Lopez

This month, we continue to highlight the utter hypocrisy of the Biden Administration and its May 2023 National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism (NSCA) for partnering openly with the Muslim Brotherhood front group CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations)—an insult and slap in the face to all Jews.

“Special Envoy for Antisemitism Explains Need to Get Into Bed With Antisemites” by Daniel Greenfield at Jihad Watch, June 13, 2023

As Daniel Greenfield notes of Deborah Lipstadt, U.S. Special Envoy for Monitoring and Combating Antisemitism, “It’s always awkward when you have to explain how, as part of the price of fighting antisemitism, you have to ally with antisemites”. His piece here references the Biden White House antisemitism plan that explicitly names the Muslim Brotherhood front group, CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations), the U.S. branch of HAMAS, as a partner in its program. Lipstadt did assure us, however, that “I’m not naïve.” Then what? Complicit, perhaps?

CAIR is no solution to antisemitism: It’s part of the problem”, by James Sinkinson in Jewish News Syndicate, July 3, 2023

Asking CAIR’s help in Biden’s national fight against antisemitism insults all victims of Jew hatred”, FLAME, July 8, 2023

“From Joe Biden’s ‘You just can’t make this stuff up’ file” from Bare Naked Islam, June 14, 2023

Envoy Deborah Lipstadt actually says that “forgiving the Hamas-linked Islamic organization for its history of terror support and anti-Semitism was a fundamental Jewish value.”

“EXCLUSIVE: Why Did Biden’s Antisemitism Strategy Involve CAIR? New Tolerance Campaign Demands Answers” by Tyler O’Neil in Daily Signal, June 28, 2023

“MUSLIM TERRORISTS and their pals at Hamas-linked CAIR are doing a happy dance over new DOJ terrorism policy” at Bare Naked Islam, May 17, 2023

Related: The Department of Justice has a “new anti-discrimination policy that would expand restrictions against use of protected characteristics in law enforcement activities”, no matter whether such ‘protected characteristics’ (such as ethnicity or sharia adherence) to identify a suspect or develop a human source might otherwise be lawful.

Continue reading

The Ascendancy of the Neocons

Karl-Olov Arnstberg is a Swedish writer, ethnologist, and retired university professor. His essays are posted at his blog, Invandring och mörkläggning. Below is today’s installment of his “Sunday Chronicle”. Many thanks to our Swedish correspondent LN for the translation:

Sunday chronicle: America’s neocons

by Professor Emeritus Karl-Olov Arnstberg
July 9, 2023

NATO’s mission, just after the organization was created in 1949, was summarized by Secretary General Lord Ismay in a three-line sentence:

Keep the Russians out
The Americans in
and the Germans down

Keep the Russians out referred to the spread of communism. The US was far more concerned about communism than it ever was about Nazism. The Americans in also had a specific meaning, namely that the Americans would remain in Europe and keep the two Western power blocs on either side of the North Atlantic together. The United States absolutely could not turn its back to Europe, as it did with its isolationist policy after the First World War.

And the Germans down meant that Russia and Germany could not unite under any circumstances, because it would mean a new superpower to challenge the US. This was the main reason why the US admitted West Germany to NATO in 1955, the idea being that the country would be so embedded in the Western sphere, that an alliance with the Soviet Union would be impossible. In 1959, Eisenhower even advocated providing West Germany with nuclear weapons.

With reference to Lord Ismay’s three lines, a related expression has been coined in neoconservative circles:

Keep Russia down,
The US in,
and China out

Here the interpretation is more problematic. What does Keep Russia down mean? That it should be defeated in the Ukrainian war? Or perhaps — which was an idea that flourished among neoconservatives in the 1980s — that the huge country should be divided into small states that mostly fight with each other and thus become completely harmless in world politics? And what does The US in mean? The situation today is completely different from that after the First World War. With all its military bases, the US is already inside large parts of the world. In practical terms, there is no possibility for them to withdraw.

Perhaps And China out is clearer? The risk of China joining forces with Russia is greater than the risk of Russia and Germany joining forces after the end of World War II. However, neither Russia nor China allows itself be affected or controlled in any way by the US.

Neoconservatives, or neocons for short, are a political grouping that emerged in the United States in the 1950s, partly as Democrats and partly as a right-wing faction of the Socialist Party of America and its successor, the Social Democrats. They hated spineless politicians, military weakness and American isolationism. Above all, they wanted to destroy the communist and the totalitarian Soviet Union. To them, communism represented a monstrous evil. Their motto: The United States is the greatest force for good among the nations of the earth.

Leo Strauss

There are two persons that the US neocons have been deeply influenced by, although neither called themselves neoconservatives. One is the “father of neoconservatism”, the German-Jewish philosopher Leo Strauss (1899-1972), who received a Rockefeller grant in the early 1930s and who emigrated from Berlin to the United States. Leo Strauss was a philosopher, but also a professor of political science at the University of Chicago. Critics say that based on Plato’s The State, he turned his students into both elitists and imperialists. One of them, Nicholas Xenos, said that:

“Strauss wanted to return to an older pre-liberal age of blood and glory, of imperialist domination and authoritarian rule, that is, of pure fascism.”

The Wolfowitz Doctrine

One of Strauss’ students at the University of Chicago, Paul Wolfowitz, later Assistant Secretary of Defense in the Bush Jr. administration and then head of the World Bank, wrote the so-called Wolfowitz Doctrine. A first draft was leaked to the New York Times in March 1992. The imperialist tone led to a public outcry. It said, among other things:

Continue reading

An Anti-Democratic and Anti-Constitutional Nightmare

The two principal pillars of totalitarian governance in today’s West are (1) national security, and (2) public health.

These largely unquestioned premises permit the executive to act without democratic input from legislative bodies. In the former case, the national executive can declare an emergency and issue edicts with the force of law. In the latter case, the same process may be initiated at national, state, and local levels.

When the two pillars combine, as has been the case since the onset of the COVID-19 madness, they give birth to an unstoppable juggernaut of dictatorial rule.

In the following commentary, a Swiss lawyer warns about the dangers of the latest public health treaty involving the World Health Organization. Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this op-ed from Uncut News:

Swiss lawyer sounds alarm on proposed changes to WHO International Health Regulations

An article by Philipp Kruse, Swiss Attorney

Published on his Telegram channel, January 3, 2023

Commentary on the proposed amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations

(Although the proposed revisions could still be adjusted before the next General Assembly of WHO Member States in May 2023). These may be found here.

The WHO shows bluntly where the journey is going: into a totalitarian dystopia without fundamental rights — in the name of health.

State of emergency and emergency law are to become the new norm; human rights are no longer protected during pandemics; The health dictatorship no longer bothers to disguise itself. The Secretary-General would be given de facto unlimited powers to declare (and perpetuate) health emergencies. Whether these are really necessary and justified is of no interest to anyone.

At the same time, it acquires (as a result) the competence not only to overrule the basic constitutional order of all states (separation of powers; principle of legality, etc.) in one fell swoop, but also the classic protective rights of individuals. In one sentence: “L’état, c’est WHO!”

If you don’t recognize these warning signs, you really can’t be helped. It cannot be shown more clearly that the WHO is no longer concerned with health, but with the enforcement of the global business interests of Big Pharma and Big IT cartels and ultimately with total control over humanity.

Checks and balances (separation of powers; accountability; control of those responsible), i.e. the basic principles of “good governance”: not a trace!

So far, thanks to Article 3(1) of the IHR, fundamental rights have still applied, at least on paper, in the International Health Regulations. According to the WHO working group, they should soon no longer be anchored there.

Once again the worst fears of us WHO critics of all countries are confirmed!

The only good thing: the spook is recognizable to everyone. The various changes in Article 3 Paragraph 1 and in Article 12 IGV cannot be denied even by disinterested politicians and state media.

Small consolation…

In the future, a small clique of democratically illegitimate technocrats will decide the fate of people all over the world. As has been the case for long stretches since 2020, the WHO Secretary-General and his backers can largely permanently override national constitutions at the push of a button.

Neither state authorities nor civil organizations will ever end unjustified WHO pandemics, nor will they be able to oppose unnecessary “recommendations”.

And if the member states then implement the WHO “vaccination goals”, the national constitutions, the Nuremberg Codex and the UN Covenant for Civil and Political Rights will no longer help people enforce the right to bodily self-determination. “Vaccine targets of the WHO” are thus as de facto legally binding as military orders, and are implemented just as uncompromisingly.

The same will apply to “WHO recommendations” on the obligation for mask-wearing and tests, access restrictions, and lockdowns.

And let’s be honest: All of this was already our global reality to a large extent “under COVID-19”.

Continue reading

It Would Have Been So Much Worse If I Hadn’t Been Vaxed

Two years ago, when the first tranches of COVID-19 “vaccines” were rolled out to the general public, the mRNA injections were still experimental. Prior to their release, the clinical trials of the jab were brief, limited, and methodologically compromised by the eventual “vaccination” of members of the control group, ostensibly on humanitarian grounds. That little trick guaranteed that there could be no longitudinal studies going forward comparing vaxed participants with the control group.

Obviously, there were no data at that time on the long-term side effects of the vax, since the mRNA treatments had been developed too recently to have acquired any track record longer than a few months. As a result, the “vaccination” of billions of test subjects all across the world became a gigantic clinical experiment to test the long-term effects of the treatment. The entire Corona project — first the release of a genetically modified coronavirus, followed by the administration of billions of doses of the mRNA injections — was arguably the largest medical/biological experiment in history.

In early 2021, when vax skeptics predicted dire consequences from the mRNA experiments, they had no clinical data to back up their projections. But all that has changed now — there is as much as two years’ worth of evidence to look at, although the UN and governmental entities have done their best to bury any statistics that might cause cracks to appear in the “Safe and Effective” edifice built to reassure everyone who rolled up his sleeve to get jabbed.

Germany looks to be the best source of statistics on the deleterious effects of the mRNA injections. The biomedical establishment in Germany is sophisticated and well-funded, and is staffed by clinicians who are less corrupt than those in most Western countries.

Furthermore, German culture is rule-based. Following the rules is important to the collective German psyche. This characteristic has its downside, which hardly needs to be pointed out to anyone familiar with the last hundred years of European history. But it also has its advantages, which are now coming to the fore as German scientists and medical experts follow the rules to document the effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines”.

The AfD’s excess mortality video report (the concluding part of the press conference is here) is notable for revealing the corrupt behavior of two major German public health institutions, the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the Robert Koch Institute. Both are required by law to collect statistics on the adverse effects of vaccines and make them publicly available, and both have failed to follow their function, despite the availability of the relevant data.

They didn’t follow the rules.

The AfD researchers who provided the data for the video are restrained in their presentation, but their outrage is nonetheless palpable. Nothing offends German sensibilities more than the failure to carry out a public duty with which one has been charged. Thanks to such sentiments — held in common by uncorrupted German public officials — we can expect more investigations of the deadly effects of the vax, even though the revealed data may contradict the established Narrative about the safety and effectiveness of the mRNA treatments.

Back in early 2021 I thought that when such data eventually became available, it would force pro-vaxers to re-examine their position. However, in the interim my opinion has shifted: I don’t think any factual data, no matter how clear and well-sourced, will change the minds of anyone who enthusiastically supports the COVID-19 “vaccine”.

My conclusions are based on personal experience. Last year I posted about an old friend of mine who was very afraid of the Wuhan Coronavirus. At the beginning of the pandemic he retreated into isolation and followed the directives of the CDC in minute detail. And, needless to say, when the experimental mRNA injections were introduced, he embraced them eagerly.

Continue reading

Biowarfare Research in Ukraine

Last March the Russian Ambassador to the United Nations, Vasily Nevenzya, addressed the United Nations Security Council about alleged bioweapons research laboratories in Ukraine.

Below are excerpts from Mr. Nevenzya’s remarks. Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:

Now, before you jump all over me: yes, I know that this may be part of a Russian disinformation campaign. It’s quite possible; Russia does put out a lot of disinformation.

But so does the United States. In fact, if the two countries ever went head-to-head, I’m not sure which one would win the disinformation sweepstakes. My guess is that 95% of the information appearing in the media about the Ukraine war is disinformation put out by one bloc or the other. In order to separate the wheat from the chaff, you have to sift through everything that appears, and try to figure out which side is grinding what axe with any particular news item.

The issue of Ukrainian bioweapons hit the news again last month, when the Security Council refused Russia’s bid to establish a commission to investigate claims that the United States, in collaboration with Ukraine, is carrying out “military biological” research that violates the convention prohibiting the use of biological weapons.

The AP story says the Security Council “overwhelmingly rejected” Russia’s request, but when you read the details about the vote, it was three to two, with ten abstentions. “Overwhelmingly rejected”, my sphincter! Yet more disinformation — the real story is that an overwhelming majority of the Security Council wanted to avoid pissing off Russia, or the United States, or both.

What I want to know is this: If Russia is sitting on hard evidence, the proverbial smoking gun, proving that Ukraine and the U.S.A. conspired in the production of biological weapons, why hasn’t it made a public presentation with all the details? Documents, photos, video, eyewitness affidavits — why haven’t we seen any of this stuff in a public forum?

There’s more to this story than meets they eye, but I don’t know what is being hidden from us. Russia, as usual, is a hall of mirrors.