Italian Parliament Votes Against the Global Pact on Migration

The Italian Chamber of Deputies has voted against signing the UN’s Global Pact on Migration, which means the government is forbidden to sign it. Interestingly enough, the two parties of the governing coalition — the Lega, led by Matteo Salvini, and the 5 Star Movement (M5S), led by Luigi di Maio — abstained from voting.

Giorgia Meloni is the leader of the anti-immigration party Fratelli d’Italia (Brothers of Italy) and a member of the Chamber of Deputies. In the following video recorded just after the vote, Ms. Meloni explains that the motion was carried by her party and Forza Italia, the party of former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi.

Many thanks to He Ha for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Péter Szijjártó: ISIS Terrorists Have Infiltrated the Flow of Migrants Into Southeastern Europe

The “Budapest Process” was inaugurated more than a quarter-century ago to manage, promote, and facilitate migration from Third World countries — most of them Muslim — into the European Union. The choice of name for the project is unfortunate from the standpoint of the current government of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, which is adamantly opposed to the very migration that the Budapest Process is attempting to push on Hungary and Europe.

In the following interview, Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó outlines the most recent session of the Budapest Process in Istanbul, and describes the resistance of the Visegrad Four + 2 (Hungary, Czechia, Slovakia, Poland, Austria, and Italy) to any further mass immigration into Europe.

Many thanks to CrossWare for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Greta Thunberg, the Teenage Spear Point of Radical Climate-Change Alarmists


A Swedish teenager named Greta Thunberg has gained international fame by starting the “school strike” movement to stop “climate change”. She even spoke at the recent World Economic Forum in Davos.

I suppose you could say she’s the Ahmed the Clock Boy of the environmental movement — a photogenic kid guaranteed to tug at the heartstrings of Progressives who get all mush-brained about the Puir Wee Bairns.

Nash Montana, who translated the material below, sends these extra details on Greta Thunberg:

Who is this girl, who is supposedly 16 years old but looks and talks like she’s four? She who is now being hyped up as the spokesperson for thousands of school-ditching kids? She is the product of her parents and of an eco-communist media world that has almost destroyed her early on in life in order to use her:

“Greta Thunberg was born to the Opera singer Malena Ernman and the actor Svante Thunberg. According to her own statements when she was 8 years old she became interested in climate change and she engaged in environmental protectionism by keeping the lights off in her house. Later she decided not to fly anymore. At age 11 she became depressive and started to self-harm and quit eating due to her anxiety about the climate. She then was diagnosed with the Asperger’s syndrome, OCD, and selective mutism. Later she engaged herself publicly against climate change.”

The translated article from Apollo News:

A student’s look at Greta Thunberg: How the climate-changers have instrumentalized a girl

The 16-year-old Swedish student Greta Thunberg has become the symbol of a young person who doesn’t want to be cheated out of her future. But she is a sick child who is being instrumentalized by the green elites in a perverse way.

The figurehead of climate change, at least according to the media, is Greta Thunberg. The by now 16-year-old Swedish girl has for weeks been in the spotlight. With her campaign “school strike for the climate” she has (supposedly) inspired millions of students and encouraged them, to demonstrate for “better climate politics”. Young people are fighting for a political issue: We here at the LJB do the same. But nonetheless I have to exercise criticism here, especially now, as I just became of legal age, that I am a young adult.

To pull off a political movement as a student is quite a lot of work. We experience this every day. For me, each week is a new balancing act, to write for Apollo while at the same time be prepared for final exams and other school requirements. But I get it all done — and mind you, without my just walking out of school on a Friday. Maybe I could organize that: School strike for Liberty. [He writes “Freiheit”, freedom, but I think in this case he means “liberty”… but it could be debated, I guess. —translator]

No doubt most people who emulate Greta and go to demonstrate believe the message they are representing. And I certainly don’t want to open that can of worms about climate change, because for that I have neither time nor space. Let’s just say it this way: A lot what so-called “climate activists say” can be thoroughly doubted. And still the narrative of the impending climate apocalypse is being pushed through the mainstream media as if there’s literally no tomorrow. Should we therefore blame these kids when they believe this stuff? If at all, then only conditionally.

Great Thunberg was born in the year 2003. The student has been diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome, OCD, and “selective mutism”, which is a psychological condition in which patients suddenly stop speaking. At age 8, according to her own statements, she began to be interested in climate change. This led her into a full-blown depression at 11 years old, including refusal to eat.

Let’s be honest here: a girl that because of a political position develops full-blown depression at 11 years old is not really suitable to be the mouthpiece for such a campaign. A girl like that needs help. Meanwhile she is advocating for very radical positions: “For me most things are black or white,” Thunberg wrote in The Guardian (which is a classical example of a borderline disorder). In plain text: Completely and utterly, or not at all. And for Greta, the choice is clear: Completely and utterly. So capitalism has to fall as a consequence. She calls for a boycott of Black Friday and demands basic changes in consumption and lifestyle. As is more often than not the case, anti-capitalism and “environmental protection” again go hand in hand. We do not know whether she was co-opted by the political Left or whether she is just used much more as a poster child.

Continue reading

Viktor Orbán: “The Liberals Are the Enemy of Freedom Today in Europe”

Earlier this week Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán gave a press conference following a meeting with his cabinet. The night before last we posted a subtitled one-minute excerpt from his remarks. The full press conference was more than two hours long.

In an epic effort, CrossWare has translated Mr. Orbán’s opening remarks, plus selected questions — ones that are relevant to a non-Hungarian audience — and the prime minister’s responses.

Long-time readers know that I consider Viktor Orbán to be a titan among European political figures. If he were the leader of, say, Germany or France, he would be able to change the course of history. And he still may be able to do so, even as the prime minister of a country as tiny as Hungary.

In his remarks Mr. Orbán discusses four major topics, all of them related to mass migration:

1.   “Liberal” democracies promote mass migration. They are also in the forefront of those who would suppress any opposition to mass migration, and they attempt to interfere with or subvert other democracies that have decided against it.
2.   Europe is in the process of dividing itself into two civilizations, one consisting of countries that have admitted large numbers of mostly Muslim migrants, the other of countries that have rejected mass immigration. Mr. Orbán refers to the former as a “mixed civilization” consisting of Islamic and (formerly) Christian components. In contrast, the Central European civilization will remain Christian, even while protecting its religious minorities.
3.   For the “mixed” civilization there is no going back. It cannot be unmixed.
4.   The pressure of migration from Africa and Asia is increasing, and will continue for decades. The issue will dominate European politics during that time.
 

Some of the questions and parts of Mr. Orbán’s answers were in English. They are not included in the transcript, but you can hear them in the video. The questions have been translated by CrossWare in a condensed form, so that the original Hungarian is sometimes clearly much longer than the subtitled précis.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for editing and subtitling this video:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Michael Stürzenberger: The Fight Against the Immigration Pact is Just Beginning

Many thanks to JLH for translating this essay from Politically Incorrect:

The Fight Against the Immigration Pact is Just Beginning

by Michael Stürzenberger
December 25, 2018

As I was participating in a massive walk right through the part of Dresden that I mentioned in my speech about the ideological garbage dump called the “migration pact,” André Poggenburg told me I should have incinerated the thing in my speech. I intended to remedy that on December 16th at Pegida, but, since Lutz Bachmann — tongue in cheek — was standing next to me with a fire extinguisher, I decided “just” to shred it. Even that shows our uncompromising determination to fight this treaty that will destroy our German homeland until it is declared null and void.

This could be one of the most important components of our existential battle in 2019 against Islamization, the Mohammedan mass invasion and infiltration of our society by leftist extreme ideologues. We must never allow illegal folk migrations to be declared legal, or masses to stream into our social systems, or ourselves to smooth the way for them, or the opening of all gates, or opening our legal system to their complaints, while the media paint it all in a positive light. Therefore all “Relotiuses”[1] among the journalists shall be outed and their destructive media work instantly halted.

And that applies to the unbalanced leftist elements in politics. In my talk, I characterized the cadre training units — the Jusos [young socialists] — in the SPD [Socialist Party], for example, as spiritual murderers, because they seriously support the abortion of near-term babies. This spiritually degraded pack are the progeny of all the 35-year-old and younger members of the Sharia Party of Germany, who are now demanding the expulsion of the few remaining clear-thinking members. Thilo Sarrazin, for example, is supposed to have done the party “great harm” with his book “Hostile Takeover: How Islam hinders progress and threatens society.”

We can only wish these leftist boneheads happy trails on the way to their own destruction. These inveterate anti-patriots have achieved unanimity among themselves in the East, and if they keep on working against the will of the people, they could fall below 5% in the provincial election in Saxony this coming year.

The CDU [Christian Democrats, Merkel’s party] is in lockstep with the SPD, when it come to self-Turkization. So the chubby Aiman Mayzek, chair of the Central Council of Muslims, was perching fat and happy in the third row of the CDU national convention, like a star guest. The Islam-collaborators in the “Christian” Democrats don’t choose to recognize that the aforementioned central council is a playground for extremely dangerous Muslim Brothers who are organized in the Islamic Community of Germany (IGD) and intend to turn Germany into an Islamic theocracy.

At the convention, an ethnic Turkish CDU Muslim sang a hymn of praise to Merkel for her opening of the border in 2015, which was “ a humanitarian achievement.” But, as every Muslim knows, it was actually the beginning of the mass Mohammedan invasion of Germany.

In Dresden, I also denounced the permeation of the German justice system by sharia. For instance, the supreme court erroneously decided that German regulations on the banning of child marriages are unconstitutional. A Syrian with a fourteen-year-old wife, who was also his cousin, had made a legal complaint. Welcome to centuries-old Islamic incest. This catastrophic decision by the tolerance-besotted supreme court means no more or less than sharia before the constitution. Constitutional law is buckling across the board. Islamization is rolling over the rule of law.

Nevertheless, I evaluate these insane phenomena as the last convulsions of the multiculti fanatics, welcoming-culture fetishists, tolerance idiots and Islam butt-kissers, whose time is gradually running out. Pace-setters for the turnaround are the mentally sound politicians in East Europe, such as the Czech parliamentary representative Jiri Kobza of the party of Freedom and Democracy:

Continue reading

Brazil Withdraws From the UN Migration Pact

Newly-inaugurated Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro has made good on his promise to withdraw from the UN’s “Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration”.

The first of the two videos below was recorded on December 18, before Mr. Bolsonaro was inaugurated. The second is a news report that was posted yesterday.

Many thanks to Lei Islâmica em Ação for the translations, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling.

Video #1:

Video #2:

The article below from O Globo (also translated by Lei Islâmica em Ação) reports on Brazil’s withdrawal from the UN migration pact:

BBC News: In a statement to diplomats, Bolsonaro government confirms exit from UN migration pact

In a telegram sent to missions abroad, Itamaraty [the Foreign Ministry] says that the country will not participate in the agreement signed in December and that it establishes guidelines for the reception of immigrants; for NGOs, the decision is ‘extremely regrettable’ and does not take into account the situation of Brazilians living abroad.

In a telegram issued on Tuesday (January 8), the Ministry of Foreign Affairs asked Brazilian diplomats to inform the United Nations that Brazil had left the Global Compact for Migration, which the country had joined in December, at the end of the Michel Temer government.

BBC News Brazil gained access to the document in which the Ministry requests the missions of Brazil at the UN and in Geneva to “inform, by note, respectively, the Secretary General of the United Nations and the Director General of the International Migration Organization, in addition to any other interlocutors considered relevant, that Brazil dissociates itself from the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration.”

The document also says that Brazil should not “participate in any activity related to the pact or its implementation”.

Although requested, Itamaraty did not confirm the information until the publication of this report. However, diplomats told BBC News Brazil on condition of anonymity that the telegram is circulating within the Ministry system and reached the addressees.

In recent weeks President Jair Bolsonaro and Foreign Minister Ernesto Araújo had already announced on Twitter that the country would leave the pact. Araújo called it an “inadequate instrument to deal with the (migratory) problem,” arguing that “immigration should not be treated as a global issue, but rather according to the reality and sovereignty of each country.”

Continue reading

Brazil Will Withdraw From the UN Migration Pact

Many thanks to José Atento (from the blog Lei Islâmica em Ação) for translating this article from Istoé:

Future chancellor says Brazil will leave Global Migration Compact

Ambassador Ernesto Araújo, who has been confirmed to take over the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said today [December 10] in social media that the government of President-elect Jair Bolsonaro will disassociate the country from the Global Migration Compact. According to him, immigration should be treated according to “the reality and sovereignty of each country”.

“The Bolsonaro government will dissociate itself from the Global Migration Pact that is being launched in Marrakesh, an inadequate instrument to deal with the problem. Immigration should not be treated as a global issue, but rather according to the reality and sovereignty of each country,” the future chancellor said in his Twitter account.

The UN Global Compact for a Safe, Ordained and Regular Migration was approved today by representatives of more than 150 countries at the intergovernmental conference of the organization in the Moroccan city.

Speaking at the conference, UN Secretary-General António Guterres drew attention to “the sovereign right of states to determine their migration policies and their prerogative to govern migration within their jurisdiction, in accordance with international law,” insisted the Secretary-General.

Regulatory mark

On previous occasions, the future chancellor had mentioned how the Brazilian government intends to deal with the migratory flow. According to him, the country will seek to accommodate immigrants by establishing a regulatory framework compatible with national reality.

“Brazil will seek a regulatory framework compatible with the national reality and with the well-being of Brazilians and foreigners. In the case of Venezuelans fleeing the [President Nicolás] Maduro regime, we will continue to welcome them, but the fundamental thing is to work for the restoration of democracy in Venezuela.”

The ambassador added that immigrants are welcome in Brazil and will not be discriminated against. However, he defended the definition of criteria to guarantee safety to all. He did not elaborate on those criteria.

“Immigration is welcome, but it should not be indiscriminate. There must be criteria to ensure the safety of both migrants and citizens in the destination country. Immigration must be at the service of the individual’s interests and the cohesion of each society.”

Why Did Angela Merkel Push so Hard for the UN Migration Pact?

The video below is a German commentary on the UN migration pact that was originally posted on the channel “Ebola — Virale Lügen”. According to the commentator’s analysis, the pact was at least partially designed to retroactively provide legal cover for Chancellor Merkel’s opening of the borders in 2015, which otherwise was illegal under current EU laws.

Many thanks to Oz-Rita for the translation and subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Angela Merkel Acknowledges the Binding Nature of the UN Migration Pact

Martin Hebner is a member of the Bundestag for the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany). In the following video Mr. Hebner addresses questions to Chancellor Angela Merkel about the UN migration pact, which Germany signed last week in Marrakesh. In the back-and-forth of their exchange, Mrs. Merkel tacitly admits that the pact she signed is legally binding on the signatories once it is confirmed by the UN General Assembly.

Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

The Mills of the Gods Grind Slowly, But They Do Grind Exceeding Fine

Seneca III wrote this piece in anticipation that Prime Minister Theresa May would survive today’s no-confidence vote in Parliament, which she did.

The Mills of the Gods Grind Slowly, But They Do Grind Exceeding Fine

by Seneca III

RIP the Conservative Party. Born in its modern form out of the 1832 Reform Act under the guiding hand of Robert Peel it, in a fit of collective madness, suicided on the 12th of December 2018.

Having produced two of the greatest Prime Ministers of the modern era it became oblivious to the necessities of good governance, put its hand on its heart, felt its wallet then voted to sustain in office what is arguably the most treacherous, asinine Prime Minister of our time and long before.

Ashes to ashes, dust to dust it will be, because that is all it became fit for in the end.

Concurrently, the whole of this present (and recent) Parliament(s) is the most wretched collection of self-serving traitors, liars, unconvicted criminals, freeloaders, sexual deviants, washing machine salesmen and morally destitute poseurs assembled in the Palace of Westminster since 1653, and it is immaterial which way or how they vote, abstain, waffle, equivocate, delay and butt-cover hereafter. The United Kingdom will be neither united, a Kingdom nor sovereign and free any longer.

For over two years, month after month, day after day they have stood and pontificated, wallowing righteously in a sea of vacuous platitudes and imagined threats whilst dragging the House and this nation deeper into a Slough of Despond than even Bunyan could have imagined. Most of them cannot deliver a coherent speech without the use of copious notes, and even then their verbal incontinence (in the main, nothing more than rancid vomitus) is painful to the eye and ear of those who have steeled themselves to watch and listen.

History will record this collection of political dwarves as unfit for any purpose other than their own enrichment and the survival of themselves and their comrades in the Globalist International; they are totally without virtue and ridden with vice. My dog has more integrity and sense of patriotism than they; he would not refuse to address the grievances of his pack nor their will as expressed through a referendum, and would not sell them to the Euro-Globalists for thirty pieces of euros (or tins of dog food) and a seat at High Table in a canine Brussels or Socialist International.

Barely any of this two-legged “All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others” parliamentary rabble could lie straight on the rack, never mind present as anything resembling pillars of rectitude. Betrayal is their watchword, and the adulation of their acolytes and (EU) paymasters their bread of life. However, bear in mind that if May & Co sign us up to the UN Immigration Pact, as is looking more and more likely, then the whole Brexit debacle, however it turns out, will be of no long-term importance as Muslim psychopaths from all over the world together with feral sub-Saharan primitives will soon flood in to finish us off once and for all.

Continue reading

Marine Le Pen on the Marrakesh Pact

The video below contains the opening remarks made by Marine Le Pen on November 27 at a press conference about “The Marrakesh Pact, the Pandora’s Box of Migratory Submersion”.

The UN pact will be signed next week in Marrakesh by an ever-decreasing number of countries. At this point it is essentially an agreement by Britain, France, Germany, Canada, the Netherlands, Sweden, and a few other European countries to take in any and all third-world migrants who want to enter. Since the Schengen Agreement will allow those migrants to disperse to non-signatory European countries, the pact will have an effect on all of Western Europe. Mind you, the signatory countries are also the preferred destinations for migrants, generally speaking, so most of them will tend to stay in the Big Five.

This is a significant event for those unfortunate enough to live in the signatory states. Ms. Le Pen provides an invaluable summary of the major features of the pact, and describes the pernicious effect it will have on France and the rest of Europe.

Many thanks to Alain Wagner for the French transcript, to Nathalie for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

For those who read French, the (untimed) French-language transcript is below the English transcript.

Video transcript (English):

0:00   On the 10th and 11th of December, in Marrakesh, Mr Macron will get ready to sign the
0:05   United Nations Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration.
0:10   All this will take place in quasi-absolute silence, a silence you, the media, are maintaining
0:16   with the exception of a disinformation campaign organised by the Quai D’Orsay (French Foreign Office),
0:20   who are peddling the so-called “harmlessness” of the pact.
0:23   This new silent betrayal of our nation signals the new step that our leaders have
0:27   taken in the orchestrated submersion of our country.
0:31   Those who promote it, driven as they are by a globalist ideology, have a pointless ambition
0:36   to make migration a boon for all.
0:40   Just as international law gives protective status to 25 million “refugees”,
0:45   pro-immigration advocates intend to give a legal status to 225 million migrants
0:50   whose journeys are now promoted, organised and protected by international law.
0:57   So, what are the Compact’s principles? The text puts in place the first stepping-stone of a
1:01   “Right to Migrate”, a right that would be recognised as a human right and
1:04   which would be enforced by international law.
1:07   The text includes an introductory statement, which makes no bones about its globalist beliefs
1:13   and its full-on pro-immigration stance.
1:16   In it migrations are presented as natural, as in, and I quote: “Migrations have been part
1:20   of human experience since the beginning of human history and we acknowledge that,
1:24   in the context of a global world, they bring prosperity,
1:28   innovation and sustainable development.”
1:32   There follow 23 objectives and the corresponding 137 concrete measures
1:35   that the signatory countries must abide by.
1:38   Four main ideas come to light in the 41-page document:
1:42   1) The active orchestration of global migrations by the signatories
1:47   2) The enforced pillaging of the host countries.
1:50   3) The institutionalisation of “parallel communities” via the institutionalisation of diasporas.
1:55   4) Pro-migrant propaganda and the criminalisation of those who would oppose immigration.
2:01   First, it aims to encourage and organise global migrations,
2:06   set up a global information network on possible migrations,
2:11   develop legal immigration pathways, thus turning consulates into
2:14   actual agencies for the management of migration routes and the settlement of migrants in our countries.
2:19   It aims to provide assistance at all stages of their migration routes and facilitate
2:25   their settlement into host countries by providing legal advice, customised financial aid
2:29   and protection, especially within their own ethnic diaspora. It aims to
2:34   facilitate access to rights and advice, and, it goes without saying, in their own language.
2:38   It aims to facilitate family reunification, to balance the influx of immigrants
2:42   against the demands of pro-migration business owners. To put in place the absolute right
2:46   for minors — and may I remind everyone that France will refuse to verify their minority —
2:51   to be given the right to settle in the name of the higher interest of the child.
2:55   To ban all measures of administrative detention. To facilitate the regularisation
2:59   of illegal immigrants. The second objective
3:03   is to put into place the pillaging of the host countries,
3:07   to implement the portability of social security benefits
3:10   for those migrants who choose to leave the host countries.
3:14   To support massive transfers of funds to the countries of origin
3:18   To encourage salaried migrants to transfer the technologies they acquired
3:22   in industrialised countries to businesses in their own countries of origin.
3:27   To institutionalise the existence of parallel societies.
3:31   It notably proposes to acknowledge the work of diasporas
3:34   in the support of migrants and in defining
3:37   and implementing immigration policies. What it comes down to, in violation of all the principles
3:41   the French Republic stands for, is delivering the country into the hands of
3:44   parallel societies of alien origin by granting diasporas, i.e. the communities of origin,
3:48   full legal recognition, and then give them the means of public action
3:52   and their own financial capacity such as the creation of investment funds for those diasporas.
3:59   The third objective is to implement, in all signatory countries
4:04   the criminalisation of all opponents of immigration.
4:07   Their aim is, for instance, to promote the benefits of immigration via “sensitisation”
4:12   and “education” of the news media… It is you who will get “reeducated”, so to speak…
4:19   and via a reformatting of public opinion, starting in schools;
4:22   a presentation document does not shy away from stating:
4:25   “We must reframe the discourse on migration so that it no longer conveys misleading or
4:30   skewed ideas and gives an exact picture of the importance of migration
4:35   and the positive role it can have in the contemporary world.”
4:39   The coarsest of all propaganda will be rolled out.
4:43   And all the more, since they mean to implement the criminalisation of those who oppose immigration,
4:48   especially during electoral campaigns.
4:51   Fourthly, by signing the compact the country commits to an irreversible future.
4:57   This pact was conceived as an important step towards a generalised global nomadism.
5:03   Contrary to what the powers that be insist, those powers who would conceal its true significance,
5:08   the pact has legal value and is legally binding on the signatories.
5:13   Each and every paragraph begins with a statement which leaves no room for ambiguity:
5:17   “We commit to…”. The signatory states agree to be summoned
5:22   at different stages in the process to report on the measures they explicitly agreed to carry out.
5:28   But, above all, the pact contains a binding commitment to the effect that the conditions
5:33   of entry into the host countries cannot ever be altered. What this means is that
5:36   the signatory countries put themselves under a binding interdiction never to redefine,
5:39   and thus harden, their immigration policies.
5:42   Not only is this compact legally binding, it allows no room to reverse those
5:46   Policies, and blocks the signatory countries from ever restricting
5:50   the conditions of entry into their lands.
5:54   We now understand better why more and more countries have refused to sign
5:57   this insane document. To date, they are Bulgaria, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Switzerland,
6:02   Croatia, the USA, Israel and more recently Italy under Matteo Salvini…
6:07   There are more, but off-hand I cannot remember them all.
6:10   The French president, fossilised as he is in his obsolete ideological dogma,
6:16   had nothing better to say than this: “It seems to me that the proposed solutions are
6:20   in agreement with both European values and European interests.”
6:25   The Rassemblement National [formerly FN] asks of the president of the Republic, who is on the verge
6:29   of signing the Marrakesh compact with a glorious disregard for consequences,
6:33   to renounce this act of betrayal. If this text were to be signed,
6:36   let me make it clear that the Rassemblement National would fight each measure therein
6:40   every inch of the way. And once the two main parties are no longer in power, we will
6:45   view this document as a worthless piece of paper.
6:49   Ladies and gentlemen, the objective of this press conference was to draw attention
6:57   to a document which, once more, was totally ignored and was not commented upon,
7:02   contrary to what happened in neighbouring countries, which saw a very lively and
7:10   well-represented national debate. This was obviously the case in Belgium,
7:16   and in the Netherlands, and of course in Italy.
7:22   Do feel free to ask me any follow-up questions.
 

Continue reading

All Aboard for Marrakesh!

The UN Migration Pact will be signed in a few days in Marrakesh. At the rate potential signatories are dropping away (Bulgaria announced against it yesterday), the nawabs of the UN will be able to seat the assembled delegates around a couple of card tables for the ceremony.

Before her name became public, Heidi Mund was known as “the brave German woman” who got ejected from a church for objecting to the presence there of an imam who offered Islamic prayers. Later she became associated with PEGIDA and other groups in the anti-Islamization movement.

In the following video Heidi Mund gives a brief report from Marrakesh ahead of the signing of the UN pact. Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Two Letters and a Morbid Prognosis

Seneca III weighs in at Britain’s future, which looks to be grim, regardless of how the House of Commons votes on the Brexit deal.

Two Letters and a Morbid Prognosis

by Seneca III

On December 11th, after five days of debate, the British Parliament will vote on the draft Brexit agreement with the European Union. This agreement has already been accepted and approved by the EU Heads of State; the European Parliament has yet to vote. If the EP and the UK Parliament also approve it then the United Kingdom will remain bound to the EU under more restraints and with fewer rights than if we had remained a full member, and Northern Ireland and Gibraltar will effectively be broken away and ceded to the direct control of Brussels and Madrid respectively.

Furthermore, rumour has it that also during December the UK (PM) will sign up to the Merkel/United Nations’ so-called ‘Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration’ which so many rational and patriotic governments have refused to do.

The level of treason, both extant and latent, in the Mother of Parliaments and throughout the Establishment is mind-numbing and without precedent since the reign of Elizabeth I. There is little the unarmed man in the street can do at this point except write to his MP… for all the good that will do.

A Letter sent three weeks ago to my MP and forwarded to the Minister of State for Immigration but still awaiting a reply from the Minister:

Dear XXXXX,

I am deeply concerned about the future physical safety of the United Kingdom, particularly our (in)ability to independently feed ourselves and sustain our essential public services even at this early stage of the occupation process. In the news today two things give me cause to write thus to you:

1.   The Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that the UK’s population in mid-2017 was bigger than ever at an estimated 66 million people, and is projected add another seven million over the next 23 years. Effectively, the UK’s population will grow by an average of more than 300,000 a year, mostly from immigration and a high birth rate in immigrant enclaves.
2.   More and more governments are declaring their intention not to sign up to the UN Migration Pact*, a devious plan designed to move vast numbers of non-indigenous, indeed often very alien and backward non-contributing cultures, into already overstretched Western economies under a thin guise of humanitarianism.
 

Essentially, the UK is full, indeed bursting at the seams, and more and more green-belt and arable land is being built over to provide living accommodation; we have a population density of 420+ per square kilometer and this includes what is left of our wilderness areas in Scotland, Wales and elsewhere which are essentially unfit for development on any major scale even if we did try to destroy them; this means that population density in those areas that can and are being developed is much higher than 420+ sq/km — a formula for chaos, internecine conflict and retrogression into barbarism.

It has long been known that rats left to breed in a closed biome with finite resources will reach a point of population density where to survive they must turn and start consuming each other. We are already seeing signs of a similar human situation developing in parts of the UK.

Continue reading

The Crap Is Out Of The Bag

The latest op-ed from the popular German columnist Hans Heckel concerns the growing ranks of countries that are refusing to sign the UN’s migration pact (Bulgaria declared against it today, if I’m not mistaken).

Many thanks to JLH for translating this piece from Preußische Allgemeine Zeitung:

The Crap Is Out Of The Bag

How the Austrians are messing up Berlin’s plans; Why foreigners are racists; And why the Italians need to be knocked for a loop.

The Week in Review, with Hans Heckel

November 10, 2018

It’s really annoying. The plan was to be quiet and secret, under the radar: sneak the “Global Pact for a Secure and Regular Immigration” into position with no attention paid publicly. No debating! That would answer questions that can only be answered evasively, if the cat is to be kept in the bag.

Now this plan is in tatters. Is anyone surprised that that it was those devious Austrians again? They pulled the plug, and a flood of unpleasant questions spewed into German public attention.

To be sure, the USA and Australia had already rejected the “Immigration Pact” that was to be signed on December 10th in Marrakesh. Hungary followed suit, and doubts grew in Poland, the Czech Republic, Croatia, Slovenia and Switzerland. But who are they really? All rightist populists!

Austria is more complicated. Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz is considered a fellow party member of the German CDU/CSU. As is Hungary’s Viktor Orbán — at least officially.

Only when Kurz formally rejected the pact did Berlin really get nervous. Then, the first CDU politicians found things a little too hot. The Interior Affairs expert Marian Wendt does not want the federal government to sign the pact. Instead, he asks for a “factual debate.” A “factual debate” — that would be something new. He offers the best of reasons for this daring stroke. Because otherwise the rightist populists would set the tone of the debate. The title of this situation should be: If the “rightists” hadn’t created the opportunity, no one would be asking about it at all.

The Foreign Office under Heiko Maas intends to take the field against “false claims” about the pact. One such false claim is that the pact contains obligations. Well, sure, some persnickety analysts searched the text and turned up the words “obligate” or “obligation” used 87 times. Which, however, in no way obliges Heiko Maas to admit such obligations. And in a sense, he is right. Rather than an obligation, the UN Immigration Pact is more a kind of chute on which the countries of Europe and North America will slowly slide into accepting anyone at all, en masse.

What is the great objective? The late Immigration Commissioner Peter Sutherland divulged it years ago: The national cultures of Europe are to be overcome — that is, semi-hollowed out and flattened (as PAZ reported). Since not everyone wants to hear that, the slide path has been chosen for the Immigration Pact.

It will be crucial to keep the “factual debate” free of critical objections. That’s the way to go. According to the AfD’s constitutional expert Dietrich Murswiek even using the expression “overwhelmed by immigrants” could lead to being accused of anti-constitutional actions. So be careful of what you think out loud, when you have not heard a single German word on the march through your own city district.

Continue reading