An Anti-Democratic and Anti-Constitutional Nightmare

The two principal pillars of totalitarian governance in today’s West are (1) national security, and (2) public health.

These largely unquestioned premises permit the executive to act without democratic input from legislative bodies. In the former case, the national executive can declare an emergency and issue edicts with the force of law. In the latter case, the same process may be initiated at national, state, and local levels.

When the two pillars combine, as has been the case since the onset of the COVID-19 madness, they give birth to an unstoppable juggernaut of dictatorial rule.

In the following commentary, a Swiss lawyer warns about the dangers of the latest public health treaty involving the World Health Organization. Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this op-ed from Uncut News:

Swiss lawyer sounds alarm on proposed changes to WHO International Health Regulations

An article by Philipp Kruse, Swiss Attorney

Published on his Telegram channel, January 3, 2023

Commentary on the proposed amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations

(Although the proposed revisions could still be adjusted before the next General Assembly of WHO Member States in May 2023). These may be found here.

The WHO shows bluntly where the journey is going: into a totalitarian dystopia without fundamental rights — in the name of health.

State of emergency and emergency law are to become the new norm; human rights are no longer protected during pandemics; The health dictatorship no longer bothers to disguise itself. The Secretary-General would be given de facto unlimited powers to declare (and perpetuate) health emergencies. Whether these are really necessary and justified is of no interest to anyone.

At the same time, it acquires (as a result) the competence not only to overrule the basic constitutional order of all states (separation of powers; principle of legality, etc.) in one fell swoop, but also the classic protective rights of individuals. In one sentence: “L’état, c’est WHO!”

If you don’t recognize these warning signs, you really can’t be helped. It cannot be shown more clearly that the WHO is no longer concerned with health, but with the enforcement of the global business interests of Big Pharma and Big IT cartels and ultimately with total control over humanity.

Checks and balances (separation of powers; accountability; control of those responsible), i.e. the basic principles of “good governance”: not a trace!

So far, thanks to Article 3(1) of the IHR, fundamental rights have still applied, at least on paper, in the International Health Regulations. According to the WHO working group, they should soon no longer be anchored there.

Once again the worst fears of us WHO critics of all countries are confirmed!

The only good thing: the spook is recognizable to everyone. The various changes in Article 3 Paragraph 1 and in Article 12 IGV cannot be denied even by disinterested politicians and state media.

Small consolation…

In the future, a small clique of democratically illegitimate technocrats will decide the fate of people all over the world. As has been the case for long stretches since 2020, the WHO Secretary-General and his backers can largely permanently override national constitutions at the push of a button.

Neither state authorities nor civil organizations will ever end unjustified WHO pandemics, nor will they be able to oppose unnecessary “recommendations”.

And if the member states then implement the WHO “vaccination goals”, the national constitutions, the Nuremberg Codex and the UN Covenant for Civil and Political Rights will no longer help people enforce the right to bodily self-determination. “Vaccine targets of the WHO” are thus as de facto legally binding as military orders, and are implemented just as uncompromisingly.

The same will apply to “WHO recommendations” on the obligation for mask-wearing and tests, access restrictions, and lockdowns.

And let’s be honest: All of this was already our global reality to a large extent “under COVID-19”.

Continue reading

It Would Have Been So Much Worse If I Hadn’t Been Vaxed

Two years ago, when the first tranches of COVID-19 “vaccines” were rolled out to the general public, the mRNA injections were still experimental. Prior to their release, the clinical trials of the jab were brief, limited, and methodologically compromised by the eventual “vaccination” of members of the control group, ostensibly on humanitarian grounds. That little trick guaranteed that there could be no longitudinal studies going forward comparing vaxed participants with the control group.

Obviously, there were no data at that time on the long-term side effects of the vax, since the mRNA treatments had been developed too recently to have acquired any track record longer than a few months. As a result, the “vaccination” of billions of test subjects all across the world became a gigantic clinical experiment to test the long-term effects of the treatment. The entire Corona project — first the release of a genetically modified coronavirus, followed by the administration of billions of doses of the mRNA injections — was arguably the largest medical/biological experiment in history.

In early 2021, when vax skeptics predicted dire consequences from the mRNA experiments, they had no clinical data to back up their projections. But all that has changed now — there is as much as two years’ worth of evidence to look at, although the UN and governmental entities have done their best to bury any statistics that might cause cracks to appear in the “Safe and Effective” edifice built to reassure everyone who rolled up his sleeve to get jabbed.

Germany looks to be the best source of statistics on the deleterious effects of the mRNA injections. The biomedical establishment in Germany is sophisticated and well-funded, and is staffed by clinicians who are less corrupt than those in most Western countries.

Furthermore, German culture is rule-based. Following the rules is important to the collective German psyche. This characteristic has its downside, which hardly needs to be pointed out to anyone familiar with the last hundred years of European history. But it also has its advantages, which are now coming to the fore as German scientists and medical experts follow the rules to document the effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines”.

The AfD’s excess mortality video report (the concluding part of the press conference is here) is notable for revealing the corrupt behavior of two major German public health institutions, the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the Robert Koch Institute. Both are required by law to collect statistics on the adverse effects of vaccines and make them publicly available, and both have failed to follow their function, despite the availability of the relevant data.

They didn’t follow the rules.

The AfD researchers who provided the data for the video are restrained in their presentation, but their outrage is nonetheless palpable. Nothing offends German sensibilities more than the failure to carry out a public duty with which one has been charged. Thanks to such sentiments — held in common by uncorrupted German public officials — we can expect more investigations of the deadly effects of the vax, even though the revealed data may contradict the established Narrative about the safety and effectiveness of the mRNA treatments.

Back in early 2021 I thought that when such data eventually became available, it would force pro-vaxers to re-examine their position. However, in the interim my opinion has shifted: I don’t think any factual data, no matter how clear and well-sourced, will change the minds of anyone who enthusiastically supports the COVID-19 “vaccine”.

My conclusions are based on personal experience. Last year I posted about an old friend of mine who was very afraid of the Wuhan Coronavirus. At the beginning of the pandemic he retreated into isolation and followed the directives of the CDC in minute detail. And, needless to say, when the experimental mRNA injections were introduced, he embraced them eagerly.

Continue reading

Biowarfare Research in Ukraine

Last March the Russian Ambassador to the United Nations, Vasily Nevenzya, addressed the United Nations Security Council about alleged bioweapons research laboratories in Ukraine.

Below are excerpts from Mr. Nevenzya’s remarks. Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:

Now, before you jump all over me: yes, I know that this may be part of a Russian disinformation campaign. It’s quite possible; Russia does put out a lot of disinformation.

But so does the United States. In fact, if the two countries ever went head-to-head, I’m not sure which one would win the disinformation sweepstakes. My guess is that 95% of the information appearing in the media about the Ukraine war is disinformation put out by one bloc or the other. In order to separate the wheat from the chaff, you have to sift through everything that appears, and try to figure out which side is grinding what axe with any particular news item.

The issue of Ukrainian bioweapons hit the news again last month, when the Security Council refused Russia’s bid to establish a commission to investigate claims that the United States, in collaboration with Ukraine, is carrying out “military biological” research that violates the convention prohibiting the use of biological weapons.

The AP story says the Security Council “overwhelmingly rejected” Russia’s request, but when you read the details about the vote, it was three to two, with ten abstentions. “Overwhelmingly rejected”, my sphincter! Yet more disinformation — the real story is that an overwhelming majority of the Security Council wanted to avoid pissing off Russia, or the United States, or both.

What I want to know is this: If Russia is sitting on hard evidence, the proverbial smoking gun, proving that Ukraine and the U.S.A. conspired in the production of biological weapons, why hasn’t it made a public presentation with all the details? Documents, photos, video, eyewitness affidavits — why haven’t we seen any of this stuff in a public forum?

There’s more to this story than meets they eye, but I don’t know what is being hidden from us. Russia, as usual, is a hall of mirrors.

Indians in Brazil Demand UN Intervention Against Election Fraud

In the following video Cacique Raimundo, the “supreme president of the majority of indigenous chiefs in Brazil”, appeals to the UN for help. He maintains that the indigenes of Brazil who supported Jair Bolsonaro in the recent presidential election have been disenfranchised by election fraud.

Many thanks to José Atento for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

They Worked Their Will on John Barleycorn

After the Soviet Union disintegrated in 1991, Communism was dead. Or so we were told at the time. However, it should be clear by now that Communism is the John Barleycorn of political ideologies:

They worked their will on John Barleycorn, but he lived to tell the tale.

That is, Communism was thought to have been destroyed, but not only did it survive, it eventually came to dominate those who believed they had destroyed it. (A full-length exegesis on this conceit may be found in my 2008 essay “John Barleycorn Was Dead”.)

The 21st-century version of the victorious ideology is not called “home-brewed ale”, but rather “Progressivism”, or the “New World Order”, or “Global Governance”, among other terms. The process of imposing the new global utopia is, of course, referred to as “the Great Reset”. Which is currently well underway, and will probably be completed before most people realize what is happening.

One of the features of latter-day Communism is that it has always been able to count on a multitude of fellow travellers among the members of the political class in the liberal democracies. The Soviets recruited agents of influence in Western governments and cultural circles, but they really didn’t have to work all that hard to find them; there was always a pool of idealistic intellectuals who were eager to embrace the utopian vision provided by the Socialist Revolution.

Communism is primarily a disease of the intellectuals. The proletariat — the purported beneficiaries of the socialist revolution — are generally indifferent to the allure of progressive utopias. But those who hold multiple advanced degrees are especially attracted to the idea of a glorious future planned and implemented by technocrats. They can draw up detailed plans for the construction of an ideal political economy, but they lack the political power to realize their dreams. Achieving such power tends to consume all their energy for well over half their lives; hence the pursuit of power becomes an end in itself.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

The following remarks by Diana West were delivered on October 27 at the Institute of World Politics in a talk entitled “Secrets of the Archives: Reconsidering Research of Bukovsky and Romerstein”. In it she draws extensively on the work of the well-known Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovsky, who was given access to the archives of Soviet intelligence during the brief interregnum in Russia after the breakup of the USSR. This recording is audio-only, but well worth your time:

In her talk, Diana refers several times to her book American Betrayal, which is available here.

Fade Away and Radiate

Ever since early 2020 the dominant theme in popular culture has been: Be afraid. Be very afraid.

For the last few months we’ve been inundated with propaganda about nuclear war.

After the Corona craze had run its course, we had a brief interlude of monkeypox hysteria, but that never seemed to develop the momentum necessary for a full-blown panic. So now we’ve moved on to the Ukraine crisis, and the evil Vladimir Putin, as a source of doom-and-gloom media histrionics.

The nuclear war theme emerged fairly soon after Russia invaded Ukraine. There was a big push to paint Mr. Putin as threatening to use nukes, even though he never did any such thing. At the same time we started to see “what to do in the event of a nuclear attack” PSAs in various major American cities. And the mainstream media kept up their fear-mongering with various nuclear-themed reports — retrospectives on the Cuban Missile Crisis and other incidents of nuclear alarms during the Cold War, analyses of what a nuclear blast would do to this or that major city, how to deal with radiation poisoning, etc.

I’ve recently come to the conclusion that a nuclear war is very unlikely, although I expect a “radiation incident” fairly soon, possibly even before the midterm elections.

The reason I say this is that the globalists of the New World Order, as exemplified by the World Economic Forum, are obviously not anticipating any nuclear attacks. They are ramping up their push for digital central bank currencies, social credit scores, 5G technology, the Internet of Things (and Bodies) and other long-term projects that involve intensive electronic infrastructure. That’s how we know they’re not planning for the grid to go down. They must have mapped out a way to keep enough juice flowing to at least keep the cell towers functioning, even during the horrific energy shortages that lie directly ahead.

Since the globalists, the media, and the top levels of the Western political apparatus are all in league with each other, we may assume that the nuclear war scare is in fact a feint.

I have a theory about the reason for it.

First they make sure the populace is terrified of a nuclear attack.

Then a “radiation incident” of some sort is arranged. Probably in Ukraine, via the false-flag use of a tactical nuke, perhaps, or an “accident” at one of the nuclear power plants, most likely the one in Zaporizhzhia.

As a result everybody in the West, especially in Europe, becomes frantic about radiation poisoning.

Then guess what happens?

Surprise! Pfizer and other pharmaceutical giants devise injections that mitigate the effects of radiation disease!

Rolled out at warp speed in just a few weeks. Administered by medical workers fitted out in radiation suits. Everybody is urged to show up at designated injection sites and get their “protective shots”.

They get everybody trembling in fear over the radiation, and then they provide the magical solution: yet more injections.

Compliance with the “booster” regime has fallen off to less than 25% in most countries, so something else is needed. A radiation incident is just the thing.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

The push for more injections has been intense and obvious since late 2020. The big question is: WHY?

The flu shot was never pushed anywhere near as hard as the series of mRNA jabs. I’ve never in my lifetime seen anything like the propaganda blitz that we’ve been subjected to on behalf of the experimental “vaccine”. Somebody really, really wants to see more needles in arms.

The evidence for the harmful effects of the mRNA treatments is now undeniable. They are especially contra-indicated for small children, and now the CDC has just given its imprimatur to a new regime that will, in effect, force parents to have their kids vaxed in order for them to attend public schools.

Somebody wants needles in arms VERY badly.

I think we can rule out the possibility that top-level health authorities are motivated by the medical well-being of their citizens. It’s fairly clear now that they’re pushing these injections despite the fact that they have been proven harmful.

After browsing various paranoid postings in the deplorable alternative media, I see three possible explanations for this demonic campaign:

Continue reading

OSCE: An Organization on the Ropes After Failing at Its Primary Mission

Henrik Clausen and Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff have once again volunteered for hazardous duty in Warsaw at the annual ODIHR conference of the OSCE™ (see this post for an explanation of my use of “™” following the acronym). Below is their report.

OSCE: An organization on the ropes after failing at its primary mission

by Henrik Raeder Clausen and Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

So we’re back, talking truth to power at the annual OSCE “Human Dimension” conference. While the Warsaw location Hotel Sofitel is the same, much is different. Old adversaries are no longer there; new challenges are emerging. We are still heeding the call by President Reagan to remain vigilant.

The all-pervading backdrop for this year’s event is of course the war in Ukraine. This is a major embarrassment for the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, as it has as its primary mission to prevent any such wars from ever breaking out again by having a forum to put forth security concerns from the various participating States (pS), to work out a compromise diplomatically, and thus to prevent any such conflicts from escalating.

For several years, our group of freedom activists has watched those dialogues become ever less constructive — but those are not our battles to fight. We originally joined to halt subversive activities from Islamist states and organizations, such as the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation), Turkey and — as it turned out — even the Muslim Brotherhood.

Unfortunately, as old enemies leave, new ones appear. A group called “CAGE UK” presented a comprehensive Muslim gripe list, both in the plenary session and at a sparsely-attended side event about “state-sponsored Islamophobia” in Austria, Denmark, and the United Kingdom. We attended the side event and asked for a legal definition of the word “Islamophobia”. Puzzled blank stares revealed that they did not have one. One side note, it was interesting that the OSCE painstakingly avoided the use of the word “Islamophobia” at all times.

We found this year’s event to be scaled back significantly. Fewer plenary sessions, fewer worthwhile side events, fewer NGOs in attendance. Even the interpretation was cut to only cover English and Russian, and there was no longer a work room for the NGOs.

Our delegation was also just a core team:

  • Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, Bürgerbewegung Pax Europa
  • Henrik Ræder Clausen, Wiener Akademikerbund
  • Peter McIlvenna, Hearts of Oak

Of our old time adversaries, many have given up and left the battleground: Turkey was still in full boycott, and with them several Turkish-funded GONGOs (Government Organized “Non-Governmental Organizations”). Open Society groups, which used to flood the conference with talks and glossy brochures, were not there. Even Bashy Quraishy (EMISCO), who used to embarrass himself responding to our interventions, was absent.

So we got down to work, as usual, with speeches and interventions. Our new delegation member, Peter from Hearts of Oak, got a fast-track introduction to how the forum works. and caught on to it very quickly. No wonder: As he has worked for our mutual friend Sam Solomon for fifteen years, we are thinking along the same lines.

Here’s what we brought up in the plenary. Please enjoy, and share:

Continue reading

You Will Be Controlled Through Your Phone

Ernst Wolff is a German finance writer. In the following interview Mr. Wolff discusses the outlines of the coming New World Order (a.k.a. “Build Back Better”) as outlined by the boffins in the brain trust of the World Economic Forum.

His remarks have reinforced my conviction that it is crucial not to own a cell phone or any other hand-held device, because it is through these portable electronic gizmos that the diktats of the new techno-state will be enforced. Digital money, social credit, universal surveillance — all will depend on the ubiquitous cell phones for their implementation.

When cell phones are made mandatory for all citizens, I suppose I’ll meet my inevitable Waterloo. Until then, however, I intend to remain as defiantly independent as I possibly can.

Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

The Beatification of St. Angela

The great thing about secular sainthood is that a doubleplusgood dignitary doesn’t have to die, but instead is permitted to enjoy the perks of beatification and canonization before he or she shuffles off this mortal coil.

Now seems to be the turn of St. Angela the Bountiful. She lavished so many boons on millions of arriving culture-enrichers from 2015 to 2021 that she has been granted the privilege of dwelling in resplendent radiance for the remainder of her time here on Earth.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from T-Online. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Merkel receives prize for refugee policy

“A lesson she leaves to history”: In 2015, ex-Chancellor Merkel decided to open Germany to refugees. Now she has been honored for it.

Former Chancellor Angela Merkel has been awarded the Peace Prize by the UN cultural organization UNESCO. “The entire jury was touched by her courageous decision in 2015 to take in more than 1.2 million refugees, particularly from Syria , Iraq, Afghanistan and Eritrea ,” said the president of the jury and 2018 Nobel Peace Prize winner Denis Mukwege in Paris. “It’s a lesson she leaves to history.” [Just like Adolf, Josef, Vladimir, Attila…]

UNESCO Director General Audrey Azoulay also paid tribute to Merkel’s commitment. “Peacemaking is also about opening doors for those who are suffering,” she explained. [And then slammed the door into the face of the victims of her policy afterwards.] “The jury’s decision is a reminder that welcoming migrants and refugees is a key concern.” [Especially when your crime rates are far too low if you want to expand the police to a State Thug Force for the better control of the law-abiding citizens.]

The prize is named after the former head of state of Ivory Coast, Félix Houphouët-Boigny. The Peace Prize has been awarded every year since 1989 to people, organizations or institutions that have made special efforts to promote, research or secure peace. It is not yet clear when the prize will be awarded to Merkel.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

The Nuclear Protection Racket

Who is hyping the threat of nuclear war, and why?

According to the UN, the “World is ‘one miscalculation away from nuclear annihilation’,” as reported in an RT article.

This prompted our Hungarian correspondent László to dissect the threat and attempt to translate it from “Deep State” into English.

The Nuclear Protection Racket

by László


The United Nations, a de facto World Government body, has now threatened humanity with nuclear annihilation:

“World is ‘one miscalculation away from nuclear annihilation’ — UN chief. Secretary-General António Guterres has warned that humanity faces the greatest risk since the Cold War”

“Miscalculation”, I think, means that the only organization that can calculate OUR safety FOR US the right way, is a higher power above all of us. Something like… the UN.

The full-blown Nuclear Psyop has now taken off, after George Soros cheerfully heralded it back in March when I wrote on Gates of Vienna the analysis below about his article:

“‘_If one decodes the word “risk” in this context, it translates into the globalist intention of floating the horror of a kinetic “WW3” above the head of humanity, with the implicit threat of nuclear escalation. You know, “It is not the thing yet, it is not WW3, it is the risk!” In this framework what Soros’ article is doing is no less than psychological warfare, and very similar to the Corona psy-op.”

Told ya so.

Since Soros has announced “WW3”, not much has changed in this regard — it is just that “they” are now turning the “risk-meter” up a bit more, in order to ramp up fear.

The UN chief gives the game away when he blames “disunity”:

“Geopolitical tensions are reaching new heights. Competition is trumping cooperation and collaboration. Mistrust has replaced dialogue, and disunity has replaced disarmament.” [my emphasis]

Nuclear “disarmament”, of course, will not take place in the foreseeable future — it is just gaslighting to create an excuse for giving the UN more power.

The translation of the above paragraph from ‘Deep State’ to English will surprise no one: the global geopolitical theater is about the agenda of the One World Government — the only organization which, they imply, will be able to handle “disunity”. It, of course, means the subordination of all those dangerous nations with all their uncontrollably free people to a central power. (The world-war theater includes Russia, on a side note, as Russia is in on Agenda 2030 as well.)

So in this context the “nuclear threat” is a protection racket. A terrorist one, on that note.

Before someone interprets this as saying the nuclear threat was unreal:

No, it isn’t. A professional protection racket includes your restaurant getting destroyed a bit, so that you take the mafia seriously.

This translates into tactical nuclear strikes — the golden middle way to the optimal level of the desired controlled destruction with the highest psychological impact. Smaller-scale, limited tactical strikes that demolish whole cities may cause enormous fear in the entire world population; while the only ones who would know that it will not be escalated will be those who run the theater.

Continue reading

Only the Best for EU Apparatchiks in Manhattan

EU functionaries, especially diplomats, are a privileged caste that already enjoys substantial perks at the expense of the lumpenproletariat they supposedly represent. Now those pampered apparatchiks are going to be equipped to face the rigors of their time in Manhattan from a cozy little pied-à-terre on the Upper East Side.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the Austrian portal eXXpress:

Nicer living in New York: EU treats itself to a new palazzo for €20 million*

First things first: Ukraine war, energy crisis, ECB chaos and mega-inflation can wait; now the EU bureaucracy is buying a nice place to stay for the trips from Brussels to New York — around €20 million of our tax money is going to the Upper East Side; the leather wallpaper is by Ralph Lauren.

Europe’s rabble has to save a bit more now — the diplomatic representation of the European Union, the European External Action Service (EEAS), feels unconstrained by the current economic crisis or any thoughts about setting an example: As the magazine Politico has now revealed, the EU bureaucracy bought an eleven-room apartment at 138 East 65th Street in New York’s Upper East Side — with €20 million in tax money.

The fine little house has just been renovated for €7 million and looks pretty neat: It’s only a few minutes’ walk to nearby Central Park, and the location of the new EU lodging couldn’t have been chosen better.

Leather wallpaper and snow-melting tiles

The EU diplomats will probably also feel comfortable inside during their visits: Ralph Lauren designed the leather wallpaper for the dining room. And in front of the entrance, snow-melting tiles have just been relaid so that the Budapesters and Manolo Blahniks of the EU delegations don’t suffer in winter. The elevator, which is upholstered with the finest leather, is also said to be a hit.

The EU representatives believe that the purchase of the property at 138 East 65th St. is a “safe investment”: Real estate prices are expected to continue to rise, and the €20 million were well invested. [while many New Yorkers will own nothing and be happy, isn’t that right?]

Eleven-bedroom palazzo for the EU on the Upper East Side

It is questionable whether all EU citizens who finance this purchase with their tax money think so: In general, it could also be discussed whether the EU leadership should buy an eleven-room palazzo in one of the best parts of New York.

And of course everything is also a question of time and optics: while Ukrainian soldiers are waiting in dirty trenches for deliveries of ammunition and weapons urgently requested from the EU, and Russia is cutting off the gas supply to one European Country after the other, the “Nicer Living Action” of the Brussels political bigwigs in New York may be viewed somewhat critically.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

A Resurgence of Jihad in Cabo Delgado

Last year I reported several times on the restive militants of Cabo Delgado in Mozambique, whose mischievous behavior included beheadings, bombings, rapes, and other forms of Islamic activism (see the links to previous articles at the bottom of this post).

Earlier this month the mujahideen resumed their attacks in Cabo Delgado, causing the displacement of yet another tranche of refugees that need to be cared for by the UN and financed by the USA.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from the Portuguese-language Folha de Maputo. The translator notes that Jihad Watch reports that the US is sending $140 million in refugee relief to Mozambique, and that last week’s attacks were carried out by ISIS affiliates:

More than 17,000 persons forced to flee after attacks in Cabo Delgado

June 17, 2022

More than 17,000 persons, mostly women and children, were forced to flee from their homes in the districts of Ancuabe and Chiure in the province of Cabo Delgado after the attacks of last week, the UN has reported.

In a press conference on Thursday, the spokesperson for the secretary-general, Stephane Dujarric, gave a brief update on the situation in Cabo Delgado after the attacks of last week, indicating that humanitarian organizations have so far assisted more than 1,700 persons while the UN humanitarian air service continues to transport supplies.

According to Dujarric, quoted by Lusa [News Service of Portugal], since the beginning of the year, the United Nations, together with its partners, has succeeded in reaching 100,000 people in Cabo Delgado, having distributed food, education, and hygiene “kits” to the local population.

“Our objective is to reach 84,000 with regular humanitarian assistance in the districts of Ancuabe and Meluco. And once again we remind all parties in the conflict that they must respect and protect the civilians as well as facilitate the humanitarian aid quickly, safely, and unimpeded to the civilians in need,” affirmed the spokesperson for Antonio Guterres at the UN headquarters in New York.

“It is also fundamental that vulnerable people — including the elderly, persons with disabilities, pregnant women, and unaccompanied or separated children — be reached with food, shelter, protection, and other urgent assistance as rapidly as possible,” he concluded.

Previous posts about Jihad in Mozambique:

2021   Mar   17   Mujahideen Lop Heads in Mozambique
        28   The Killing Fields of Cabo Delgado
        31   Making Mozambique Safe for Democracy

How Skeptical Should You Be?

Corona is so 2021. Monkeypox is where it’s at!

Our Hungarian correspondent László breaks down the scaremongering propaganda about the latest epidemic craze.

Monkeypox Psy-Op: “How worried should you be?”

by László

What many have suspected is now supported by evidence: it is a psychological operation again.

In an apparently coordinated propaganda campaign, an awful lot of media outlets have been asking the exact same question:

How worried should you be about monkeypox?” [highlight is mine].

That you have to be worried is no longer a question!

A list of media outlets that are all searching for the answer to the above torturing question:

Independent, Boston University, Time, University of Michigan, MSN, Reuters, My Doctor Finder, The Guardian, NDTV (Indian) — and the list goes on and on.

Shortly after the Covid scaredemic that has shredded the nerves of the population, “experts” are not even bothering to pretend to be factual — for example by asking “how dangerous” this upcoming “pandemic” is. Therefore the notion (not the fact) that it is dangerous, is already a given. Which means that many people probably think they have to be worried; the only question is HOW worried. At least the “elite” would like to believe that the serfs think so.

“How worried should you be”… The Deity of Science, the aggressive bouncer of the “elites”, has a paternalistic relationship with the man of the street when it orders him, its subject, what to feel in any given moment. Outer, objective reality does not matter any more; the Powers That Be are targeting your emotions directly. (No wonder “they” are planning to literally wire up your brain.)

This is like making a horror movie! You project a horrible yet invisible threat and then you are floating it, letting the viewers’ imagination do the rest of the work of priming their own minds… And then BOO, you scare them with the current bogeyman!

“How worried should you be” — LOL, such blatant “nudging” of the sheeple.

No, I did not make this word up: “nudging” was first mentioned during the last two years by the SAGE group, the team of behavioral psychologists in the UK government that had been entrusted with the wicked job of elaborating a mechanism to control the poor Britons, primarily through fear. And this time it even goes beyond nudging: it looks more like dragging people on a leash.

Continue reading