Why Are Germans So Unhappy?

Actually, my title is misleading. It’s not that Germans are necessarily unhappy, it’s that they are significantly less happy that they were in 2020. That’s according to a UN study, which surveys the level of happiness among citizens of various countries.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Der Wochenblick:

According to a UN study: Germans and Austrians are becoming increasingly unhappy

In the mainstream media, it is repeatedly claimed like a mantra that we are doing better than ever, that everyone is so happy. And politicians from the old parties regularly strive to create a picture of the population that agrees on this — perhaps with the exception of a few constantly nagging critics of the system, who it is best not to listen to. Anyone who expresses criticism is quickly stigmatized as an enemy of the constitution or as a “Schwurbler”. [someone who speaks without any facts or knowledge of the subject he or she is talking about, i.e. the political elite] But can the alleged satisfaction be maintained in the long term? A study by the UN raises doubts.

By Achim Baumann

The United Nations (UN) has now presented the current “World Happiness Report” (WHR). It is about the satisfaction of the citizens of a country. The basis of the ranking, which was created for the tenth time by the “UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network”, is a sophisticated evaluation system that measures the “subjective self-perception of one’s own existence” as well as “positive and negative emotions”. In other words: how satisfied the citizen actually is.

Finland again in first place in the ranking

At the top are Finland, Denmark, Iceland and Switzerland, followed by the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Sweden, Norway, Israel and New Zealand.

Please note: The statistics were created before the Russo-Ukrainian war and reflect the feeling of satisfaction for the year 2021. Possible threat scenarios played no role in the preparation of the statistics. Finland is the winner again. The Finns were already five times more satisfied than other citizens in the world, the ranking includes a total of 146 countries.

Germany and Austria slipped

While Germany’s neighbor Luxembourg ranks 6th, Austria and Germany only follow in 11th and 14th place. Now, 11th and 14th place may not look bad, after all there are around 130 places behind them. But Germany, for example, has slipped from 7th place to 14th place. This clearly shows that the citizens of the Federal Republic have become considerably less satisfied. And Austria slipped, albeit only marginally, from 10th to 11th place. But here, too, the trend is downwards.

Continue reading

Time to Discard the Puppets


Until recently, Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum tended to avoid the light, preferring to work behind the scenes discreetly inserting alumni from their Young Global Leaders program into positions of power in various governments, corporations, and non-profits.

Recently, however, the machinations of Herr Schwab and his cronies have become more and more open. As various national leaders — including those installed by the WEF, most recently Justin “Baby Doc” Trudeau — faltered in their attempts to impose one or another aspect of the New World Order, the WEF has weighed in on events with a clear attempt to impose the Global Governance model on what were formerly nation states.

The following report from Austria indicates that Klaus Schwab and the WEF are at the point of discarding their puppets in various national governments so that they can move directly and overtly into a system of world government, even though 2030 is still almost eight years away.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the Austrian regional weekly Der Wochenblick. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

WEF Führer now speaks directly to us in guest commentary

The end of political puppets? Klaus Schwab heralds a global dictatorship

Klaus Schwab is now openly calling for world dictatorship. He outlines this in his guest commentary in the Handelsblatt.

The WEF (World Economic Forum) leader is now speaking frankly directly to us — future propertyless — citizens. Previously, he only did this indirectly through his “Global Leaders” in politics and business. But Schwab has a claim to power and he shows it more and more clearly. He explains that the social inequality that has now sometimes been implemented by national parliaments on his behalf must lead to a new form of government. And a global dictatorship. It will probably mean the end for [Austrian Chancellor Karl] Nehammer and Co.

“Global Governance”

He glossed over the desired dictatorship as “Governance 4.0”. Ultimately, Schwab — together with his friends — as he now openly announces, will blame national politics for the big failure and the big Covid lies. He explains: “The reason for our failure to anticipate and manage global risks […] lies in an unresolved problem of global governance.” While Schwab inveighs against the failures of national politicians, he also points out the trick he uses to keep criticism of his global dominance at bay. Nobody should direct their attention to “Governance 4.0”; attention should probably be diverted away, as Schwab suggests: “If our institutions are well-governed, we pay little attention to them. They are barely visible infrastructure that supports the economy and virtually every aspect of social order.” Mind control through the “Internet of Bodies” and the cheap gratification of needs in the increasingly desired virtual reality might make this possible.

“Aimless handling”: Klaus Schwab is now also blaming political losers

Schwab apparently wants to abolish our existing institutions and democracies by means of Corona misery. They are “no longer useful,” he sums up dryly. Corona has already introduced “Governance 3.0”, an “operative crisis management” based on “trial and error”. But Schwab is not satisfied with that. He complains that this approach has led to “a haphazard handling of the pandemic and its socio-economic consequences.” That’s interesting, especially since the “haphazard handling” he mentioned is mainly carried out by politicians from his “Global Leaders” program.

But now Schwab is blaming national politics. [I wonder who gave them their marching orders?] It is becoming increasingly clear that our governments are ultimately making themselves “losers” in this game. They just seem to be totally unaware of it. Or do Austria’s political actors even believe that after the abolition of national parliaments, good positions in Global Domination await them?

Continue reading

Vax Hacks Make Big Bucks

It has become abundantly clear that the Wuhan Coronavirus “pandemic” is being promoted by globalist players who want to initiate the Great Reset and reshape the world in alignment with their own preferred template. It also seems obvious that the drive to achieve this transformation is fueled by a commitment to an all-encompassing political ideology about a New World Order.

However, as documented by the following video, it’s also undeniable that the major players in this apocalyptic drama stand to profit handsomely from the transformation they are pushing on the rest of us.

Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

The General Manager of the World’s Pandemics


Deplorable Americans such as myself are accustomed to the idea that the World Health Organization and the NIH are in effect wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The following article outlines a similar situation in Germany, detailing the various groups and activities funded by the Gates Foundation.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Boris Reitschuster’s website. Note: the acronym RKI stands for the Robert Koch-Institut, the German equivalent of the CDC:

$500,000 “donation” from the Gates Foundation to the RKI in November

Joint simulation games reveal years of collaboration

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation of the now divorced Gates couple is financially the strongest private foundation in the world. With deposits of nearly $50 billion in December 2020, it is way ahead of other large foundations. The second-largest foundation is currently the Wellcome Trust with around half of the deposits. Another important foundation that has great global influence is the Rockefeller Foundation, with nearly five billion dollars in endowment. The fields of activity of the foundations are similar.

Areas of activity of the Gates Foundation

The Gates Foundation operates on many levels. People like to support friendly mainstream media such as Der Spiegel in order to generate awareness (“Public Awareness”) for the topic of “Global Health”. This already clearly shows that the area of “global health” is of particular importance. This goes hand in hand with a strong commitment to vaccine development.

On the other hand, it would be malicious to assume that journalists are being bribed here for PR purposes, and are then supposed to report benevolently on certain topics. In total, the Gates Foundation has already distributed almost $320 million directly to media companies.

Furthermore, the Foundation operates in the field of agricultural development (“is Agricultural Development”). As one of the largest shareholders in the Bayer subsidiary Monsanto, the Gates Foundation is trying to promote the use of genetically modified — and thus patented — seeds. Therefore, in December 2021, 40 million dollars were donated to the “Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa”. An alliance that is gladly given a lot of support.

But Gates also seems to have taken a career as a farmer personally. Because nobody in the USA owns as much farmland as he does. He is now allowed to call almost 100,000 hectares of land in the USA his own.

But projects in the areas of women’s rights, family planning, education, nutrition and gender equality also regularly receive foundation funds.

It is redundant to point out again that all financed projects serve the good of humanity. The Gates Foundation is therefore a charitable organization, as evidenced by its entry on Wikipedia.

The approach of spicing up one’s own image with the help of a philanthropic activity was previously used by John D. Rockefeller. Even before the Rockefeller Foundation was established (1913), he was the first oligarch to donate $600,000 in 1890 (2021: $18.3 million) to found the University of Chicago.

Due to their charitable purpose, foundations receive extensive tax exemptions, which allow them to protect private assets from the tax authorities by transferring them to the foundation. For example, the Gates Foundation is a 501 (c) (3) organization and is therefore exempt from income tax.

Continue reading

The UN Pays Protection Money to the Taliban

I’ll bet the citizens of Belgium are shocked — shocked! — to learn that the UN is funneling some of the money sent to them to the Taliban.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from the Vlaams Belang website:

Belgian money goes through UN to the Taliban

December 23, 2021

The United Nations is making $6 million (€5.3 million) available for the Afghan Muslim extremists of the Taliban for “protection of UN personnel”. The money serves as salary for the Taliban extremists from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, who guard the UN facilities in the country.

The head of the Afghan Ministry of Internal Affairs is Sirajuddin Haqqani, the second-ranking leader of the Taliban and the leader of the so-called Haqqani Network, which during the war carried out several bloody attacks in the country.

“Every year, several million euros in tax money flows from Belgium to the UN, and so this country is indirectly a co-financier of the Taliban in Afghanistan,” says Vlaams Belang Member of Parliament Ellen Samyn. And naturally, for Vlaams Belang, that is not acceptable. Samyn will also question the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Sophie Wilmes (MR [Mouvement Réformateur, Reformist Movement]). “I will demand that not one euro cent of tax money flow to the Taliban, and that Belgium bang on the table at the UN to strongly condemn this unauthorized cooperation and support for the Muslim extremists of the Taliban.”

Nationalism

The latest essay by our Israeli correspondent MC discusses Nationalism and Socialism. Which one is good, and which one is bad? And which one is currently ascendant in this our twilight dystopia?

Nationalism

by MC

“Hear nothing that we do not wish you to hear. See nothing that we do not wish you to see. Believe nothing that we do not wish you to believe. Think nothing that we do not wish you to think.”

— Joseph Goebbels (Peikoff p.60)

The Bible tells us that Yah split the people into nations, and that behind the pre-Babel globalism was ‘Nimrod’ the mighty Hunter.

In the Hebrew, Esau was also a ‘mighty hunter’ — literally ‘a man of the field’; it is one of those phrases in ancient Hebrew that is not well understood. Just think how confusing the 1955 Doc Brown found Marty’s use of the word “heavy”…

The Trinity of Nimrod, Semirage and Tammuz was not at all healthy. The tower (of Babel) that they built was obviously designed to withstand a repeat flood, giving Yah the finger as such. The same kind of flood that Yah had used to wipe out a pre-flood mankind that was playing with genetic modification and creating chimera as described in the Book of Enoch., The flood wiped out the Nephilim (Giants), which Nimrod also wanted to reconstruct, post-flood.

Mankind could not be trusted with globalism even then, and this ‘new’ globalism is likely to be similar to what it was under Nimrod, with Satan rubbing his hands in glee.

There is nothing intrinsically wrong with Nationalism, but it does mean that we have to decide whether the problem with the Nazis, the National Socialist German Workers Party. was the Nationalism or the Socialism, or both.

Socialists claim it was the Nationalism that was at fault and have demonized ‘nationalism’, even whilst, in many ways, upholding it. After the war they took the moral high ground, claiming that all wars would be stopped if ‘nationalism’ was eradicated. This is one of the founding memes of the European Union and it is there in the preamble to the Treaty of Rome: the idea of “ever closer union”. Although the EU has a democratic façade, it is ruled by a committee, a “Council of Ministers” which ‘votes’ on items submitted to it by a ‘commission’ which comprises senior civil servants from the member nations under their respective ‘commissioners’ (a sinecure position given to retiring national politicians). There is, in the EU, a democratic deficit which is hidden behind the façade of a powerless European Parliament.

In many ways this European behemoth resembles the Nazi administration posited in its 1942 planning, and when compared with the way the United States tackled the same set of problems with disparate states in a federal (nationalist) setting, one can begin to see the contrasts. The USA, historically, had an amazing ability to recognize problems early and resolve them before they became fatal.

The Nazis sought a homogeneous German culture which excluded ‘non-Aryans’. The EU wants a unified ‘European’ man. The modern “Great Reset” wants to recreate a homogenized feudal culture where enslaved people across the whole world are allowed to exist solely to produce food and goods for the master race.

In the USA, each state has retained its unique character. Why? Because the idea was to keep Federal interference at a minimum, limited by a Constitution to defence and affairs of state via an elected executive. The EU, however, seeks to ‘harmonize’ the various member states via diktats from an unelected body. In the UK we always bought petrol (gas) by the imperial gallon, and butter by the half-pound. That all had to change once we joined the EU, and many small gas stations had to close down rather than buy new gas-pumping equipment calibrated in litres.

Another EU diktat also required that abattoirs have separate entry roads and exit roads. Again, many small local abattoirs had to close down.

Eventually the UK decided to leave the Union, and it seems many other groups across Europe are considering the same. Poland is having its issues, too, finding out that the EU is intolerant of Polish tradition and culture. There is a hidden cost to membership and access to funds: that of conformity and cultural suicide.

Over the top of all this are the ghoul billionaires, injecting cash into a globalist agenda. Soros and Gates were preceded by a hundred years by the multi-millionaire Cecil Rhodes who used his fortune to set up the original infrastructure (The Round Table) for world domination.

An interesting read on Rhodes and his influence is here. Although it contains the real history, it is a propaganda piece where the history is spun in such a way as to create a conspiracy theory.

Continue reading

Lion or Gazelle?

The aristocrats of the ecology movement are the predators, while ordinary people like you and me are the prey. In order to Save the Planet, we will be culled the same way a pride of lions culls a herd of gazelles.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the German site Recentr.com:

The elite 1001 club behind the eco-agenda

Prince Bernhard [of the Netherlands] created “The 1001: A Nature Trust” together with Prince Philip to finance the activities of the WWF [World Wildlife Foundation]. On board was Anton Rupert, an African tobacco billionaire of Dutch descent who was involved in the secret society “Afrikaner Broederbond”, which controlled South Africa and which had implemented apartheid.[16]

For a long time, public information about 1001 was almost completely unavailable, and all that was learned was that handpicked members had to pay a membership fee of $10,000.

Similar to the Bilderberg Group, the principle of confidentiality applies, and you can at least learn from a leaked internal report that the 1001 Club holds regular meetings in Windsor Castle, at the residence of the Spanish royal family, and in distant places like Nepal.

According to leaked membership lists, the 1001 Club includes people such as:

Maurice Strong: Member of the Privy Council in Canada (British Commonwealth), Fellowship of the Royal Society of Canada.

In the early 1970s he was Secretary General of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment before becoming the first Director General of the United Nations Environment Program in 1972.

He is considered the inspiration for former US Vice President Al Gore, who released the eco-propaganda film An Inconvenient Truth.

Sir Max Aitken: Politician and Chairman of Beaverbrook Newspapers Ltd. His father was Max Aitken, First Lord Beaverbrook, member of the Privy Council, owner of the extremely influential Daily Express newspaper and sometime Minister of Information. His friend Winston Churchill made Max the Senior Minister for Aircraft Production during World War II.

Sir Eric Drake: Chairman of British Petroleum (BP)

Baron Conrad Black: He owns major newspapers and companies and has been involved in many scandals. At times he was on the Privy Council of Canada. His friend, US President Donald Trump, pardoned him in 2019.

King Juan Carlos of Spain: Juan Carlos, who came from the house of the Bourbons, is a member of the powerful eco-organization the Club of Rome.

He is the eldest son of Juan de Borbón y Battenberg, whose mother was Victoria Eugénie von Battenberg, from the Welfen lines Hessen-Darmstadt as well as Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (the same lines as Prince Philip and Queen Elizabeth).

Henry Ford II: From the highly controversial family of automakers. The Ford group goes back to the scientific network of the Royal Society or the Guelph nobility (see chapter in this book about the auto industry). His grandfather Henry Ford was one of the leading anti-Semites, supported the NSDAP and provided both the Nazis and the Soviets with technology that was essential to the war effort.

Continue reading

“They Will Really Bring Everything to a Complete Collapse”


Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is a German lawyer and politician who leads a regular podcast called Corona Ausschuss (“Corona Committee”). The following video is the last of three excerpts from a recent podcast by the group (previously: Part 1, Part 2).

In this segment Ernst Wolff, a journalist and author who specializes in the economics of globalism, elaborates on the Great Reset and the form that the New World Order will take after the old one has been thoroughly destroyed. He pays particular attention to the coming global digital currency that will supplant the dollar, and the expected Universal Basic Income (UBI).

Many thanks to Oz-Rita for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

NWO Idol Pops up on a Budapest Street

Our Hungarian correspondent László sends the following disturbing report on the latest globalist machinations in Budapest. Before the “pandemic” began, I thought of Hungary as a model for the West, but it’s becoming clear that country of the Magyars is just as much a puppet on the New World Order as the rest of Western Europe and the Anglosphere.

Due to my previous career as an artist, when I look at a design like the mural of Mother Vax, I automatically assess its technical proficiency. In this case I notice that the left earpiece of her eyeglasses disappears into her hair at a bizarre angle, way above the top of the ear. When they’re spending so much money on monumental Soviet-style hagiographic art, you’d think they could at least hire a competent artist.

Also: what are those strange things at the top in her hair that look like apostrophes or quote marks? They seem to be in the positions where horns might appear. Just sayin’…

NWO Idol Pops up on a Budapest Street

by László

An enormous mural of a cultish portrait, honouring Hungarian mRNA-jab developer Katalin Karikó, is being painted on the wall of a house in Budapest. Communism reloaded. The writing is on the wall.

An Ominous String of Events

A string of events in Budapest herald the victory of the New World Order:

  • The portrait of the Hungarian mRNA-jab developer, Katalin Karikó, is being painted as a five-story-tall mural, on the wall of a house in Budapest, Hungary. The project is supported by the government.
  • At the same time, Hungarian FM Péter Szíjjártó holds a press conference in Budapest with Communist WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Gebreyesus, who praises the jab-developer for her ‘pioneer’ achievement. Mr. Szíjjártó calls the genocidal WHO-chief ‘my old friend’.
  • On another note, the Hungarian FM insinuates that the unjabbed are ‘harm-doers’.

What seems to be just a pile of unrelated events at first sight in fact draws a dark overall picture.

An Immortal Idol From the Future

The ‘artwork’, which is being created on Krisztina Boulevard in Budapest, is also supported by the government. The five-story-tall mural that is being painted to honour Katalin Karikó, the Hungarian-born developer of the mRNA-based coronavirus vaccine, seeks to ‘immortalize’ the scientist.

As the English-language Daily News Hungary puts it:

An immense wall painting to immortalize vaccine developer Katalin Karikó in Budapest

The Hungarian issue of Forbes seems to know even more about the mission of the project:

The future will be written by Hungarians — this is the motto next to Katalin Karikó’s portrait on the giant mural.

Forbes_hu also informs its readers that the makers of the mural target young people:

Continue reading

The Big Lie of the U.S. War on Global Terrorism

The Big Lie of the U.S. War on Global Terrorism

by David Boyajian

Millions of illegal aliens swarm across our borders, yet little is done to stop them.

As big cities’ homicides soar, their police departments are being defunded.

Such destructive domestic policies remind us of this destructive foreign policy: Successive administrations and the State Department have often shut their eyes to international terrorism and even covered it up.

As the 20th anniversary of 9/11 and America’s Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) looms, this shocks the conscience. It also endangers the homeland and our military men and women overseas.

We’ll prove that Turkey and Azerbaijan remain among the most egregious sponsors of international terrorist organizations and that the U.S. covers for those countries.

Among these organizations: ISIS, Al-Qaeda, Al-Nusra, Ansar Al-Din, Hamza Division, Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham, Jaysh Al-Sunna, Sultan Murad Brigade, Sultan Suleyman Shah Brigade/Al-Amshat, and more.

Terrorist Turkey

  • Ahmet S. Yayla, Turkey’s counterterrorism chief from 2010-13, has acknowledged that “Turkey was a central hub for… over 50,000 ISIS foreign fighters, and the main source of ISIS logistical materials [including] IEDs, making Turkey and ISIS practically allies.”
  • Veteran State Department adviser Dr. David L. Phillips directs Columbia University’s Peace-building and Human Rights Program. Its research confirmed Turkey’s alliance with ISIS: ISIS-Turkey Links (2014) and Turkey-ISIS Oil Trade (2015/2016).
  • In Turkey: A state sponsor of terrorism? (May 28), Phillips wrote that if a “non-NATO country behaved like Turkey, it would warrant designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism,” like Iran and North Korea.

    He also describes Turkey’s sending terrorist mercenaries (some listed above) into Azerbaijan against Armenian-populated Artsakh/Nagorno-Karabagh in 2020.

  • In 2014, the New York Times reported that “Western intelligence officials… track the ISIS oil shipments… into Turkey” and that Turkey has failed “to help choke off the oil trade.”
  • In January and July, the U.S. Treasury Department identified Turkey as a financial base for ISIS and Al-Qaeda. However, the U.S. has penalized only some Turkish individuals and companies, not Turkey itself. Regardless, the effect has been minimal.

As with Turkey, the State Department has largely ignored utterly corrupt Azerbaijan’s long record of supporting terrorism.

Terrorist Azerbaijan

Continue reading

Paul Weston on the Great Reset

In the following video Paul Weston discusses the Great Reset, the grand scheme for a New World Order as proposed by Klaus Schwab, the founder of the World Economic Forum. Digital currencies, universal surveillance, and universal digital IDs (a.k.a. “health passports” or “vaccine passports”) are integral components of the plan.

Paul Weston is a British-based writer who focuses on the damage done to Western Civilisation by the hard Left’s ongoing cultural revolution, which seeks to destroy the Christian, capitalist and racial base of the West. For links to his essays, see the Paul Weston Archives.

Hat tip: Steen.

SARS, Gain of Function, COVID, and the Vax: A Timeline

MissPiggy compiled the following timeline for our skype group. I’m not going to tell you what to think about all this; you can easily draw your own conclusions.

2002

November: University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill (UNC) researcher Ralph Baric publishes a “breakthrough work” in gain-of-function research (studies that alter pathogens to make them more transmissible or deadly), describing the creation of a synthetic clone of a natural mouse coronavirus.

November: China’s Guangdong province reports the first case of “atypical pneumonia” (later labeled as SARS).

2003

October 28: A paper by the Baric research group at UNC describes their synthetic recreation of the “previously undescribed” SARS coronavirus. (Writing in 2020, a scientist states, “The speed of the Baric group illustrates how quickly a qualified team of virologists can create a synthetic clone from a natural virus, and therefore make genetic modifications to it. Moreover, that was back in 2003. Today, a qualified laboratory can repeat those steps in a matter of weeks.”)

2011

December 30: Dr. Fauci promotes gain-of-function research on bird flu viruses, arguing that the research is worth the risk. The risks worry other “seasoned researchers.”

2012

Christine Grady, wife of Anthony Fauci since 1985, becomes head of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, opening up the possibility of numerous conflicts of interest concerning vaccines, HIV and COVID-19. Grady previously served in the Department of Bioethics as an investigator (2004-2012), senior staff bioethicist (1996-2004) and head of the Section on Human Subjects Research (1998-2014). Like her husband, Grady has made HIV a central career focus, including stints on the Scientific Advisory Board of the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (which Fauci helped launch), as a paid consultant for the WHO and UNAIDS and, in 1987-1988, as a staffer for President Reagan’s Commission on the HIV Epidemic. Grady’s 1995 book is titled The Search for an AIDS Vaccine. Fauci, who became NIAID director in 1984 under Reagan, holds a number of HIV vaccine-related patents.

April 20: Baylor College researchers publish their evaluation of four vaccine candidates for SARS, concluding that “Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.”

May: The 194 Member States of the World Health Assembly endorse the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP), led by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in collaboration with NIAID, WHO, Gavi, UNICEF and others. Dr. Fauci is one of five members on the GVAP’s Leadership Council.

October: Fauci writes article in the American Society for Microbiology saying “gain of function” benefits outweigh the risks.

2013

May 7: Email from Kary Mullis to the widow of boxer Tommy Morrison, whose career and life were destroyed by an “HIV test,” and who litigated ferociously for years, against test manufacturers. Dr. Mullis wrote on May 7, 2013:

“PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment.”

“If things were done right, ‘infection’ would be a far cry from a positive PCR test.”

“PCR is a needle in a haystack technology that can be extremely misleading in the diagnosis of infectious diseases.”

2014

Merieux (former employer of Moderna CEO) is instrumental in creating high-security P4 Lab that opened in Wuhan in 2014.

Dr. Deborah Birx takes the helm of PEPFAR (the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief), which Dr. Fauci helped launch (in 2003) and which benefits from generous Gates Foundation support. Birx and Fauci are long-time allies, having worked together during the early years of AIDS and sharing overlapping career paths.

October 7: National Institutes of Health (NIH) director Francis Collins announces a “new phase of cooperation” between NIH and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, including partnering for vaccine development.

October 17: U.S. funding of SARS to create a biological weapon is paused due to the extreme risk of a pandemic. However, the pause allows agencies within the U.S. government to continue funding if they determined “the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national security.”

Continue reading

The Origins of the Wuhan Coronavirus

The French virologist Luc Montagnier led the team at the Pasteur Institute that discovered HIV in 1983. In 2008 Professor Montagnier was awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine in recognition of his work. The following video about the origin of SARS-CoV-2 includes remarks by Prof. Montagnier, who assigns ultimate responsibility to the Pasteur Institute. The professor also emphasizes that it is not COVID-19 that is dangerous, but the “vaccine” against it.

(Luc Montagnier has been featured here several times since the Coronamadness began. See posts here, here, and here.)

Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

The Pandemic Panopticon

The savants who manage global affairs never let a crisis go to waste. Our political and social betters have seized the opportunity provided by the Wuhan Coronavirus to expand their control, management, and surveillance of ordinary citizens, who are required to obey the new rules that were imposed in response to the “pandemic”.

The following article reports on a meeting in Davos where the issue of pandemics was discussed. The emphasis was on globalism — the global nature of the crisis, the necessity for trans-national co-ordination, shared information, and above all a binding international pandemic treaty.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this essay from the German portal Multipolar Magazin:

International Pandemic Treaty: A Global Automatism is Installed

A new contract should prescribe an internationally binding procedure in the event of health emergencies. At the same time, false information about pandemics and vaccinations should be combated. What is it about, and what is planned?

In her speech at the Davos Dialog of the World Economic Forum in January, Chancellor Angela Merkel stated:

“If we look at what the pandemic has done to us, my conclusion is that it can be seen as a confirmation of everything that has always made up the spirit of Davos in recent years. […] But I believe that the pandemic has also made it clear to us that a time for action is coming, in which we will act as concertedly as possible, as jointly as possible and as far as possible according to the same and jointly discussed principles, in which something is done in order to overcome as far as possible the weak points that we have all experienced.”

The extent to which the pandemic confirms the “spirit of Davos” remained cryptic. What the concerted action mentioned should look like can be seen in a prominent guest article published in the FAZ [Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung] at the end of March. Under the heading “A great treaty to combat pandemics”, more than 20 heads of government are calling for globally binding measures to combat pandemics — including Merkel and the heads of state of Great Britain, France, Spain, Norway, the Netherlands, Greece, Ukraine, South Korea, Chile, South Africa and Indonesia; also the President of the European Council and the Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO).

Contract without prior processing of the measures

The initiative is being put forward before a transparent political and legal review of the previous pandemic measures can take place, for example:

  • to influence the population through fear in order to justify encroachments on fundamental rights,
  • on the basis of the declared epidemic emergency and on the role of the PCR tests as alleged evidence of infections,
  • on the question of treatment recommendations (early intubation, no medication) as well as the misappropriation of successful treatment concepts that could have reduced the death rate among sick people if they had been widely communicated and implemented,
  • related to the question of the justification of the emergency approval for the mRNA and DNA preparations (vaccines),
  • through country comparisons, to answer the fundamental question as to whether the so-called “non-pharmaceutical interventions”, in particular the lockdowns, are a suitable means of combating infection,
  • on the health, existential and economic consequences of the lockdowns and thus on the proportionality of the encroachments on fundamental rights.

Lack of “Global Political Leadership”?

The independent panel “Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response” set up by the WHO General Assembly in May 2020 does not do justice to these concerns in its report. The questions listed above are not even asked; that which should actually be examined is presupposed.

The preparation for a pandemic was inconsistent and underfunded, and the early warning system worked too slowly. There was a lack of “global political leadership”. Right now the priority is to end the illnesses and deaths caused by Covid-19. Every affected country should systematically take non-pharmaceutical measures. Demands include that rich countries should finance one billion vaccine doses by September 1 and two billion vaccine doses for poorer countries by mid-2022.

The authors of the aforementioned guest article in the FAZ share with Bill Gates and a plethora of pandemic scenarios the assumption that pandemics should be seen as a growing global threat to the future for which one must prepare. At the beginning of the text, a comparison is made with the situation after the Second World War, which the Chancellor had already made in the spring of 2020 to justify the first lockdown:

“The Covid-19 pandemic posed the greatest challenge to the global community since the late 1940s. Back then, after the devastation of two world wars, leaders came together to lay the foundation for the multilateral system. […] The states should act more together, the temptations of isolationism and nationalism should be averted and challenges addressed that could only be overcome together in a spirit of solidarity and cooperation — peace, prosperity, health and security.”

The UN Charter is alluded to as the basis of international law. Analogous to the UN, “a more robust international health architecture” is to be built on the basis of an international treaty on pandemic prevention and control based on the so-called “International Health Regulations” of the WHO.

A joint approach is intended to achieve “closely coordinated pandemics to be better predicted, avoided, recognized and assessed, as well as to effectively combat them.” The necessary instruments are in particular warning systems, the “shared use of data”, tests for diagnosis and immunization through vaccines. There is also talk of fair access to safe and inexpensive drugs, but this goal is no longer pursued, in contrast to the emphasis on vaccine development, as immunization through vaccination is “a global public good.”

In the context of preparing for the next pandemic, the proposed contract aims to “recognize a ‘One Health’ approach […] that links the health of people, animals and the entire planet.” Instead of going it alone at national level, a stronger obligation through “more mutual accountability and shared responsibility, transparency and cooperation in the international system in accordance with its rules and norms” must be introduced. Pandemic preparedness requires “global leadership for a global health system that can cope with the demands of this millennium.” In addition to the heads of state, “all stakeholders, including civil society and the private sector” should be included in global leadership.

Continue reading