A Maverick Among Socialists

Oskar Lafontaine is a German politician and the former leader of the Social Democrats. Back in July I reported on his surprising departure from the Narrative concerning the experimental mRNA treatments for SARS-CoV-2 being pushed on the population via government propaganda. In an American political context, the media might label Mr. Lafontaine a “maverick”.

Oskar Lafontaine is continuing his maverick stance, supporting a prominent footballer who has declined to be “vaccinated”.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from PolitikStube:

Oskar Lafontaine: Kimmich and the Covidiots

The left-wing politician Oskar Lafontaine spoke out in the “vaccination debate” about the Bavarian professional Joshua Kimmich in a Facebook post, and wrote:

It has been observed for a long time that the polemical word “Covidiots” falls back on a number of people who are treated as experts in Germany and who believe they can teach others. The reactions to the Bavarian football star Joshua Kimmich’s declaration that he has not been vaccinated and, because he does not know the long-term consequences of vaccines, he is waiting for a classic vaccine (dead vaccine), show once more the plight of German expertise. For once, I don’t want to quote the Covid Crybaby Lauterbach, but the head of the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the chairman of the Standing Vaccination Commission (Stiko).

The head of the Paul Ehrlich Institute, Klaus Cichutek, said: “In general, with vaccines, most side effects occur within a few hours or days, in rare cases even after weeks. Long-term side effects that only occur after years are generally not known with vaccines.”

The man should be praised; he deserves a job where he can do less harm.

The chairman of the Stiko, Thomas Mertens, told the news agency dpa: “There is a consensus in science that side effects occurring late after a vaccination do not occur, or are an extreme rarity for individual vaccines”.

You don’t even have to know the cases in which long-term effects of vaccinations have been observed, it is sufficient to quote from the contracts that were concluded with the vaccine manufacturers BioNTech/Pfizer: “The buyer acknowledges that the long-term effects and the effectiveness of the vaccine is currently unknown and that the vaccine may have undesirable effects that are currently unknown.” If the head of the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the chairman of the Standing Vaccination Commission were right, then the pharmaceutical company would not have had the idea to protect itself this way.

Kimmich is not only an excellent footballer, he can also think more clearly than some of the so-called experts. And that he, like many others, is waiting for a classic vaccine raises the question of why the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has still not approved a classic vaccine, even though the two Chinese dead vaccines from Sinovac and Sinopharm have been used millions of times to vaccinate people around the world.

Cracking Down on the Unvaxed

Germany is facing a new wave of COVID-19 this autumn as people move indoors and the Delta variant rages through the population. Among other measures being discussed is the establishment of a legal basis for cracking down on the unvaxed.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the Epoch Times:

Lauterbach calls for a legal basis to tighten the rules for unvaccinated people

The SPD [Socialist] politician Karl Lauterbach has warned of the sharp rise in Corona numbers among children. “After the autumn break, we will see significantly more outbreaks in schools because the children can no longer ventilate,” he told the editorial network Germany (RND, Monday editions). Lauterbach called for a nationwide uniform test strategy in schools.

The SPD politician demanded: “Test three times a week, that would be my suggestion, in the morning with antigen tests, because these detect the prevailing delta variant very reliably. In addition, five test days in a row for contact persons of infected people.” This could practically end the uncontrolled pandemic in schools. Children who have had contact with infected people do not have to be in quarantine.

Lauterbach may want to tighten rules for unvaccinated people

But care is not only needed when it comes to schools, Lauterbach told the newspapers: “There will also be chains of infection in companies. The same goes for bars and restaurants. We can expect a continuous increase.”

According to Lauterbach, a federal-state resolution on a uniform approach is needed. “I feel sorry for the children who are now exposed to the long-Covid risk,” he told the papers. “The fact that we are now stopping testing in many places with increasing numbers is completely unacceptable,” he added.

Lauterbach also demands “an urgent legal basis that enables us to maintain the protective measures and probably even to tighten them — at least for those who have not been vaccinated.”

In Bild the chairman of the board of directors of the German Foundation for Patient Protection, Eugen Brysch, demanded daily free rapid tests for people in need of care and their contacts. Brysch told the newspaper: “Germany must protect the 2.3 million people in need who are dependent on inpatient and outpatient care, as well as hospital patients, with daily free tests for them and their contact persons”.

Finnern: Schools prepared for Corona autumn

Maike Finnern, chairwoman of the Education and Science Union (GEW), sees the schools as prepared for a second Corona autumn. “Viewed nationwide, schools are better positioned this autumn in terms of health protection than they were a year ago,” said Finnern to the RND. The vaccination rate among employees in the schools is extremely high. “If the prevention path is continued consistently, the schools can remain open.”

Finnern criticized that many schools are still not equipped with air filters. “There is an urgent need for action here,” said the GEW chairwoman to the newspapers.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

A German Policeman’s Lot is Not an Easy One

Boris Reitschuster is a popular German vlogger and journalist. I’ve posted his videos a number of times in the past, but below are three textual posts from his website, all translated by Hellequin GB.

The series began with an lengthy email from a policeman, which generated a lot of comment. This article — the most recent one — posts a message from a police officer that refers to previous articles:

Police officer insider report: We “literally work for the trash”

“Discrepancy in the political guidelines for migration policy and Corona measures”

A week ago I published the shocking insider report by a federal police officer about what was happening at the German-Polish border. It triggered a lot of reactions. I was particularly impressed by the letter from a policeman I knew. He confirmed the experiences of his colleague — and complained that the officials “literally work for the trash” and are measured by two standards on the instructions of politicians. Here is the letter from the policeman who earlier described interior views from the police service for my side:

This very authentic letter from a federal police officer relentlessly takes a look at the fundamental problems in this country. However, it is also a confirmation of my article and the existence of “critical officials” within the police apparatus.

The statements of the federal police officer regarding the migrants sound very familiar to me and must therefore be taken seriously!

A few additional thoughts that crossed my mind while reading the text of my colleague: As a police officer who witnessed [the migration crisis of] 2015 and what happened back then, there are clearly visible parallels compared to today. At that time, the events of politics and the media were presented in the best possible light, while the current conditions at the German borders were completely disregarded. Nonetheless, both approaches have in common that the difficulties associated with the issue are completely ignored and, moreover, critics of this type of migration policy are defamed as “right-wing populists”.

In connection with the letter from the federal police officer, it is also important to me to point out a fundamental problem to which, in my opinion, far too little attention is paid.

Also at the risk of expressing myself politically incorrectly: People who enter or stay in German federal territory illegally and without a valid passport are liable to prosecution within the meaning of Section 95 of the Residence Act. As a result, a police officer must file a criminal complaint if these provisions are in place. This also applies when people ask for asylum. If those migrants are unable to show any valid identity documents or residence permits (which is usually the case), they are initially suspected of violating Section 95 of the Residence Act.

As mentioned in the letter from the federal police officer, this means that if a large number of asylum seekers have been apprehended, a large number of police officers are also necessary to deal with the cases. This includes, among other things, the search, the production of a criminal complaint including identification measures, and, if necessary, the transfer to asylum shelters.

For a complete processing of such a case (!), the officer, in my experience as a state police officer, has to plan at least one hour. So you can imagine how lengthy the processing of numerous asylum seekers can be on the one hand and how much time remains for the police work “on the street” on the other.

However, what bothers me most in this area to this day, is that you knew and know that you are working symbolically “for the wastebasket” even before the production of reports began. Early on during the events in 2015, we were informed by the responsible public prosecutor’s office that the police would not be followed up with in connection with the illegal stay of people. You can surely imagine how motivated you are and how motivated you were when you’re doing the paperwork, when you know that what you have written can only serve as the filling in a wastepaper basket, but at the same time it is made clear to you by a manager that failing to prepare a criminal complaint comprises a criminal offense of obstruction of punishment in office. Finally, just a small reference to the fact that in Germany the public prosecutor’s offices are dependent on the instructions of the respective ministers of justice…

As can be seen in the colleague’s letter, the discrepancy between the political guidelines for migration policy and the Corona measures is considerable.

In my opinion, this is due to the fact that politicians know exactly parts of the population on which they can impose tough measures and which parts, in their opinion, they have to be extremely careful of so that no backlash and “unsightly images” are generated ( Keyword: appeasement policy).

I think it is obvious that none of this can be in the interests of social cohesion in Germany.

I would like to thank my colleague for his words and I hope that the readers of this page were able to get an authentic look at the policeman’s working world, which is often the subject of numerous speculations.

The second article features an earlier response from another police officer:

Continue reading

Vexed Docs Nix the Vax

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the German-language service of RT:

More and more doctors are getting out: Only every third practice still offers COVID-19 vaccinations

Corona vaccination: 37,000 of the former 70,000 medical practices involved have now dropped out of the campaign. According to the KBV (National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians), this is probably due to the high vaccination rate. The so-called booster injections are now on the agenda. Are there also increasing doubts about effectiveness and safety?

by Susan Bonath

Vaccination alone is the way out of the pandemic. The media, institutions and politics have been showering the population in Germany with this slogan for ten months. This is justified with an alleged consensus “of science” about good effectiveness and high safety of the vaccine.

But not only do some scientists see it differently. More and more doctors also seem to doubt the effectiveness and safety of the four conditionally approved vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. While you can “pick up” for yourself a tetanus or flu vaccination from almost any doctor, currently only every third practice offers the Corona vaccination. More than half of the family and specialist practices that were initially involved have now withdrawn from the campaign.

Only 33,000 out of 100,000 practices vaccinate

This was announced by Roland Stahl, spokesman for the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KBV), at the request of the author. According to him, there are 55,000 general practitioners and 45,000 specialist practices nationwide who were invited to take part in the vaccination marathon. “At the height of the vaccination campaign in summer, over 70,000 practices took part,” said Stahl looking back. Today only around 33,000 doctors vaccinate; the rest have left the program.

That means: since summer around 37,000 of the formerly over 70,000 doctors have dropped out of the vaccination campaign, i.e. more than half. KBV spokesman Stahl puts this down to the high vaccination rate. “A large part of the population is now fully vaccinated, or only a second vaccination is missing,” he said. Many of the practices would probably have largely vaccinated their patients and therefore stopped vaccinating.

In addition, there are “a few doctors” who had already thrown in the towel in the spring because of “initial delivery problems with the vaccines,” said Stahl. It was not until around June, at the beginning of the summer vacation, that enough vaccines were available for everyone, he noted. However, the KBV does not have precise figures on this.

Twice as much fee as for flu vaccinations

However, the number of vaccinating doctors had already dropped significantly in the summer. As Die Welt had reported, 23,000 practices had already dropped out on August 15, i.e. almost a third of those involved. Accordingly, the vaccine orders have been falling since June. In Thuringia, according to an MDR report , half of the doctors no longer took part as of mid-August. According to the broadcaster, this is mainly due to the fact that several doses have to be obtained from one ampoule. That made planning difficult.

Continue reading

Pollyanna — Please Come Home

In the following essay MC tackles the dire state of affairs in the fragmented country formerly known as the United States of America.

Pollyanna — Please Come Home

by MC

I truly believe that Communism/Nazism/Socialism is Satanic. Whilst the useful idiots may actually believe that they are doing the “good works” of Socialism, to Yah they are as “filthy rags” (in the Hebrew this is understood as “used sanitary towels”): “All of us have become like one who is unclean, and all our righteous acts are like filthy rags; we all shrivel up like a leaf, and like the wind our sins sweep us away.” (Isaiah 64:6)

Socialists of all stamps seem to feel righteous and superior when they inflict their ‘good’ doctrines upon us. But their coercion and forcible conversion are essentially meaningless in the realm of Yah’s knowledge of Good and Evil, and they too will be judged against the Ten Commandments. They will be held accountable for their theft (redistributive taxation) and their murder as well as of throwing their ‘gods’ in Yah’s face (first commandment in Hebrew).

In Acts we read of a community of “followers of the WAY (of Yah)”. The important thing to understand is that this was a totally voluntary community, no coercion; people were happy to share what they could bring to the community. Anas and Safira sought to deceive and were struck down, not by the community, but by God himself.

But this Acts community is not Socialism or Communism where the community is not voluntary and the ‘pigs’ exploit Snowy — Snowy must join the bread queue whilst the ‘pigs’ have their food brought to them by servants.

Many point out the nasty side of the Bible, the death penalty for sodomy, adultery and fornication, for example. But this was for the same voluntary community structure that we read about in Acts. You keep the Commandments, leave and go to one of the refuge cities, or be put to death.

What is missing from Socialism is the “voluntary” element. The few who believe themselves ‘enlightened’ and thus qualified to dictate to the rest of us how we should live. This is forcible conversion, not to a ‘religion’ as such, but to a much nastier and more ruthless political religion.

The COVID-19 vaccine mandate falls into this category of forcible conversion. Everything about the SARS-COV-2 saga is a lie. But an effective one that has panicked half the world into compliance.

I have never been a fan of vaccination. From the days of Edward Jenner it has been a huge revenue-earner, and this always seems to have been of greater priority to medical professionals and their Big Pharma owners than the safety and effectiveness of the products.

This link sums up the Naturopathy view of vaccines: dangerous biologicals for the treatment of non-dangerous (in clean and well fed-people) diseases.

If the Covid vax were safe and effective, then why worry about a so-called “pandemic of the unvaccinated”? Why are the unvaccinated deemed to be a danger to the vaccinated? Is this a political stunt rather than a medical one? The evidence that it is becomes more and more convincing as we listen to the vaccine effectiveness countdown, now at 3% and dropping.

Continue reading

Austria Makes Life Difficult for the Unvaccinated

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from oe24:

Summit hammer: Lockdown for Unvaccinated!

The times for vaccine-refusers could soon get tougher. If the intensive care unit becomes more and more stressful, it could even lead to a “lockdown” for those people who have not been immunized.

This is the result of a meeting of the government and state governors, which was held partly virtually on Friday evening.

Levels 4 and 5 planned, with level 3 only PCR test valid

With 25 percent utilization of the intensive care beds, 2G is to be introduced for restaurants, hotels, events as well as hospital and care visits. This means that the facilities can only be used by vaccinated or recovered. From level 5, which should come at 30 percent utilization, there should be a lockdown for unvaccinated people.

How exactly this should look is unclear. These are likely to be the general (exit) restrictions that generally applied in earlier high phases of the pandemic.

However, with the 30 percent occupancy, which corresponds to 600 beds, a rather dramatic situation has already arisen. Because from 33 percent at the latest, it becomes finally critical in the intensive care units. The country is currently at level 1 with 224 intensive care beds occupied, and level 2 with 300 occupied beds. Then a 2G rule applies in night catering (and “similar settings”) as well as for events without assigned seats with more than 500 people; i.e. only those who have been vaccinated or recovered have access. This is already the case in Vienna. Level 3 with 400 beds or more means that the antigen test is completely invalid. Only those who have been vaccinated, those who have recovered or who have a current PCR test would have access to settings that are subject to 3G.

Levels 3-5 in the overview

3rd level from 400 ICU beds (without 7-day follow-up)

  • 2.5G (= vaccinated, genetic or PCR test) wherever 3G was previously valid
  • Antigen tests no longer recognized

4th level from the covering of 500 ICU beds (without 7-day follow-up)

  • 2G (= vaccinated or recovered) where previously 2.5 G

5th level from 600 ICU beds (without 7-day overrun)

  • Exit restrictions for unvaccinated people, i.e. leaving their own private living area only due to a few exceptional reasons (work, daily needs, close reference person)
  • 2G in all indoor settings that are not covered by exceptions

Schallenberg: “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated”

Federal Chancellor Alexander Schallenberg (ÖVP) had warned in advance of a “pandemic of the unvaccinated without need”. Health Minister Wolfgang Mückstein (Greens) is also there. It is important, together as the federal government, to clarify the further procedure in a timely and transparent manner, it said in a written statement from the Minister of Health before the start. The federal states are of course important partners here. “Our top priority is to increase the vaccination rate in Austria in order to get through autumn and winter safely. The mutually agreed step-by-step plan and the measures anchored in it provide an important basis for this,” explained Mückstein.

Continue reading

The Not-So-Magic Bus

When I searched for an image of a vaccination bus for the top of this post, I discovered how widespread they are — you can find pictures of them in all major cities and towns in the USA, the UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. And the iconography that appears on the sides of the buses is fairly uniform, falling into several major types and color schemes, but always with that cheery Big Brother propaganda look.

Once I stumbled on the German phrase (der Impfbus) I was able to find similar images from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Were I to learn “vaccination bus” in Dutch, French, Italian, or Spanish, I assume that I would find pretty much the same schema in all those countries.

The whole thing gives me the creeps.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Report24 about an incident with a vaccination bus in Austria:

Woman collapses in front of the vaccination bus in Upper Austria — not an isolated case!

Attentive readers have already pointed out to us several times that the only clarification in the Covid vaccination education talks is the question of “right or left” [arm]. With the so-called vaccination buses, physically handicapped people are often vaccinated in front of the bus and the information sheets are paid little or no attention. One of our readers, the attentive citizen and activist Peter Schutte, tells us about his visit to the vaccination bus in front of the NMS in Sattledt.

“Dieter K. and I met at the vaccination bus in Sattledt at around 11:25 am and wanted to use flyers from the ‘Respekt’ platform and information sheets to inform people who are willing to be vaccinated with the Covid-19 vaccine. Soon after we arrived, the ÖVP mayor, Gerhard Huber, joined us and insulted us. He wanted to see my ID and he forbade us to ‘unsettle’ people with — as he called the technically sound information — ‘fake news’. I showed him our informational materials, but he just said that we should ‘get out of his parish area’. After all, he must have arranged for citizens to get vaccinated here, and that the whole thing was voluntary anyway. Almost every one of the ten people who went to the vaccination bus during our stay said that we would ‘spread fake news, are Corona-deniers and opponents of vaccinations’.”

No consultation before vaccination

“Last week we were in Grieskirchen to inform the people there and were not expelled. As today, there was no education in Grieskirchen for citizens who were ready to be vaccinated. The people who wanted to be vaccinated were only informed by a paramedic which form should be filled out and signed for which vaccine. Nowhere to be seen were the ‘red doctor’s letters’ with references to vaccination damage. When I asked whether people willing to be vaccinated should be informed, there was only the brief: “Of course not. You can read everything on the internet.” To my objection that older people in particular had no way of getting information on the Internet, the answer was: “It doesn’t matter; they can ask.” I timed the duration of the entire process — from filling out the medical questionnaire, signing, and getting on the bus, until the vaccinated person came outside again vaccinated. It was exactly three minutes. What clarification can happen in three minutes?”

Collapse after vaccination — not an isolated case

“After the injection, a young lady sat down on one of the armchairs provided in front of the bus, began to twitch wildly and fell over when she tried to get up. I filmed this situation briefly. Not out of sensationalism, but to document that precisely such incidents have occurred.

Continue reading

The Death Knell of Sweden

Sweden as a society is currently run by women, specifically feminist women. The prime minister is male, and numerous members of parliament are males, but important cabinet posts and administrative positions in the bureaucracy are filled by women. Female social workers. Female police chiefs. Female directors of enterprises, both public and private. And the ideology that animates public service and cultural institutions is avowedly feminist.

It is this feminist, feminized ideology that requires Swedes to welcome immigrants and celebrate them. Sweden has no legitimate culture of its own, so Swedes must embrace the multiculturalism that immigrants bring. Even if those culture-enrichers abuse, mutilate, brutalize, rape, and murder women and girls.

By 2050 — in less than thirty years — Sweden will no longer be run by feminists, because there won’t be enough of them left. Oh, there will be plenty of women, but the majority of them will be the property of patriarchal polygamous men who have been welcomed in from the Third World to enrich Swedish culture.

Unless there is a general societal collapse in the interim, Sweden in 2050 will be governed by patriarchal polygamous men under some form of sharia law. I don’t know what will become of the feminists under those circumstances. Perhaps they’ll become the obedient veiled third or fourth wives of the dominant males.

The following documentary discusses the anti-feminist consequences that Sweden’s gynocracy has brought down upon the country through its love affair with Third World immigrants. The video is in both Swedish and English, with the Swedish portions subtitled in English.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript (Swedish portions):

Continue reading

Something is Rotten in Rhode Island

Dr. James McDonald is the Medical Director of the Rhode Island Department of Health. The following video shows a portion of Dr. McDonald’s testimony in Rhode Island Superior Court on October 19, 2021, as part of Richard Southwell et al v. Daniel McKee et al — PC-2021-05915 (a.k.a. “Mandatory Masking on Trial”).

By his own admission Dr. McDonald knew that no children died of COVID in Rhode Island, and that an undetermined number of deaths attributed to the Wuhan Coronavirus — possibly many thousands of them — were caused by something else. Nevertheless, his department went ahead with its absurd and abusive mask mandate for schoolchildren.

The audio quality in the video leaves something to be desired, and the fact that everybody is wearing masks makes it doubly difficult to understand what people are saying. Fortunately for us, MissPiggy used her dogged determination (and much better hearing than mine) to create a transcript of the footage. Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for subtitling and uploading this video:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

A Defector From the Borg

Ole Skambraks is an employee of German public broadcasting. His latest essay also brands him as a heretic in the Church of Corona and a traitor to the Pandemic Narrative.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this piece from Multipolar Magazin. The translator includes this prefatory note:

I find it quite amazing that he addresses something we’ve been complaining about for YEARS. This is nothing NEW, but it took this Plandemic to rattle his (forced-funded by the taxpayer) gilded cage and wake him up. Better late than never, and I guess we should be thankful for even this little crumb of guilty conscience.

The translated article:

I can’t do it anymore

In an open letter, an ARD [German regional public broadcaster] employee is critical of one and a half years of Corona reporting: Ole Skambraks has been working as an editorial staff member and editor with public broadcasting for twelve years.

I can no longer be silent. I can no longer silently accept what has been going on for a year and a half at my employer, the public service broadcaster. In the statutes and state media treaties, things like “balance”, “social cohesion” and “diversity” are anchored in the reporting. The exact opposite is practiced. There is no real discourse and exchange in which all parts of society can find themselves included.

Right from the start, I was of the opinion that public service broadcasting should fill exactly this space: promoting dialogue between proponents and critics, between people who are afraid of the virus and people who are afraid of losing their fundamental rights, between vaccination advocates and skeptics. But for the past year and a half, the space for discussion has narrowed considerably.

Scientists who were respected in the time before Corona, who were given space in public discourse, are suddenly crazy, tinfoil-hat wearers or Covidiots. As a much-cited example, reference is made to Wolfgang Wodarg. He is a multiple specialist, epidemiologist and long-standing health politician. Until the Corona crisis, he was also on the board of Transparency International. In 2010, as chairman of the health committee in the Council of Europe, he exposed the influence of the pharmaceutical industry on the swine flu pandemic. At that time he was able to express his opinion personally on public broadcasting, but since Corona this has not been possible anymore. So-called fact-checkers have taken his place and discredit him.

Crippling consensus

Instead of an open exchange of views, a “scientific consensus” was proclaimed, which must be defended. Anyone who doubts this and calls for a multidimensional perspective on the pandemic earns outrage and malice.

This pattern also works within the editorial offices. I haven’t been working on the daily news for a year and a half, which I’m very happy about. In my current position, I am not involved in decisions about which topics are to be featured and how. Here I am describing my perception from editorial conferences and an analysis of the reporting. For a long time I did not dare to step out of the role of the observer; the supposed consensus seemed too absolute and unanimous.

For a few months now, I’ve been venturing out onto the ice and making a critical comment here and there in conferences. This is often followed by a concerned silence, sometimes a “thank you for the suggestion” and sometimes an instruction as to why this is not so. Reporting has never emerged from this.

The result of one and a half years of Corona is a division in society that is second to none. Public broadcasting plays a major role in this. It fulfills its responsibility to build bridges between the camps and promote exchange less and less.

The argument is often made that the critics represent a small, negligible minority, to whom one should not give much space for reasons of proportionality. This should be refuted at the latest since the referendum in Switzerland on the Corona measures. Although there is no free exchange of opinions in the mass media either, the vote ended at just 60:40 for the government. Is it possible to speak of a small minority with 40% of the votes cast? It should also be mentioned that the Swiss government had linked the Corona aid payments to the vote, which may have influenced the decision of some to tick “Yes”.

The developments in this crisis are taking place on so many levels and affecting all parts of society so that right now we need not less, but more free space for debate.

What is revealing is not what is discussed on public broadcasting, but what goes unmentioned. There are many reasons for this, and it requires an honest internal analysis. The publications of the media scientist and former MDR Broadcasting [regional public broadcaster] Councilor Uwe Krüger can help, such as his book Mainstream — Why we no longer trust the media.

In any case, it takes some courage to swim against the current in conferences where topics are discussed and discussed. Often the one who can present his arguments most eloquently prevails; in case of doubt, the editorial management decides, of course. Very early on, the equation was that criticism of the government’s Corona rate belongs to the right-wing spectrum. Which editor dares to express a thought in this direction?

Open questions

The list of inconsistencies and unanswered questions that have not received substantial coverage is very large:

Why do we know so little about gain-of-function research (research into how viruses can be made more dangerous for humans)?

Why does the new Infection Protection Act state that the basic right to physical integrity and the inviolability of the home can from now on be restricted — regardless of an epidemic situation?

Why do people who have already had Covid-19 have to vaccinate again even though they are at least as well protected as people who have been vaccinated?

Why is “Event 201” and the global pandemic exercises in the run-up to the spread of SARS-CoV-2 not discussed or only in connection with conspiracy theories?[2]

Why was the internal paper from the Federal Ministry of the Interior, known to the media, not published in full, and discussed in public, in which it was demanded that authorities must achieve a “shock effect” in order to clarify the effects of the Corona pandemic on human society?

Why does Prof. Ioannidis’ study on the survival rate (99.41% among under 70-year-olds) not make it into a headline, but rather the fatally false projections by the Imperial College (Neil Ferguson predicted half a million Corona deaths in the UK and beyond in the spring of 2020 2 million in the U.S.)?

Why does an expert report prepared for the Federal Ministry of Health say that the occupancy rate of the hospitals in 2020 by Covid-19 patients was only 2%?

Why does Bremen have by far the highest incidence (113 on October 4th, 21) and at the same time by far the highest vaccination rate in Germany (79%)?

Continue reading

Hungarian Court: The Vax Pass is Non-Discriminatory

The Hungarian Constitutional Court has ruled that the country’s vaccine passport — called a “certificate of immunity” — is non-discriminatory. Which doesn’t make any sense — if the vax pass really is non-discriminatory, it’s a totally useless document.

But of course it’s discriminatory: it distinguishes between those who have been “vaccinated” and those who haven’t, and confers special rights and privileges on the former group while disadvantaging the latter. That’s the exact definition of discrimination.

The real issue is whether or not the vax pass violates the Hungarian Constitution. I don’t understand Hungarian, so I can’t comment on that aspect of the case. I’ll have to defer to the Constitutional Court on the issue.

Many thanks to László for translating this article from the Hungarian news portal Index.hu.

Is the immunity card discriminatory? The Constitutional Court has ruled

In a decision published on Tuesday, the Constitutional Court unanimously rejected the constitutional complaints challenging the constitutionality of the government decree regulating the immunity card. According to the petitioners, the regulation causes a lasting and serious violation of fundamental rights for those who do not have an immunity card. However, the constitutional judges held that the provisions at issue did not infringe the prohibition of discrimination.

In recent months, almost a thousand constitutional complaints have been lodged with the Constitutional Court, asking for the annulment of certain provisions of Decree No 484/2020 (XI. 10.) on the second phase of protection measures to be applied in times of emergency, relating to the protection card.

According to previous information from the Constitutional Court, the vast majority of the constitutional complaints had the same wording and the cases were divided into several groups on this basis. The five-member chamber, chaired by Miklós Juhász and composed of Ágnes Czine, Attila Horváth, Imre Juhász and Tamás Sulyok, President of the Constitutional Court, grouped the petitions with similar or identical content under case number IV/1093/2021.

As previously reported, the petitioners challenged before the Constitutional Court the provisions of Government Decree No 484/2020 which grant additional rights to holders of the official certificate of immunity (the “Certificate of Immunity”) provided for in Government Decree No 60/2021 (12.2.21) on the certificate of immunity against the coronavirus, compared with persons who do not hold such a certificate.

In the applicants’ view, the contested provisions of the Decree discriminated against those who, on the basis of their decisions taken on the basis of health risks, did not hold an immunity certificate, thereby causing serious violations of their fundamental rights.

According to the applicants, the discrimination was not based on necessary, proportionate and reasonable constitutional grounds, in particular the fact that an immunity certificate issued prior to the establishment of immunity under the vaccination protocol does not guarantee the effective establishment of immunity even for those who can prove their immunity under the Government Decree.

The decision of the five-member panel of the Constitutional Court, whose rapporteur was Miklós Juhász, held that the exercise of certain fundamental rights may be suspended or restricted beyond the limits set by the Fundamental Law in times of emergency.

Continue reading

The Stiffs Keep Piling Up

In the following RAIR Foundation video, a British undertaker named John O’Looney is interviewed by Vlad Tepes about the increased number of corpses — he says by 300% — that have passed through his establishment since “vaccination” began last winter.

Mr. O’Looney has strong opinions about the vax, and is unstinted in giving voice to them. He presents anecdotal data, rather than statistics, but it’s still worth paying attention to what he has to say:

A Reminder: We Will Not Comply

In a time of universal vaccine mandates, non-compliance is a revolutionary act.*

The landing craft is now bumping through the raging surf, and will shortly be ejecting us onto our very own Omaha Beach.

Yes, we are in the midst of a war. There are no non-combatants.

Looking at it from one angle, everyone who has been “vaccinated” has already surrendered and been taken prisoner. The rest of us — the ones who have refused, sometimes known as “purebloods” — are now being intensively targeted in a renewed offensive by the enemy. There are very few unjabbed people left who can be easily coerced into getting the vax, so we can expect the next phase of the war to become particularly nasty.

There has never been a conflict like this one, at least not in my lifetime.

As I have said repeatedly in the past, we are in the midst of an information war that has been going on for decades. Here in the glorious Year of Our Lord 2021 it’s still an information war, but over the last two years it has opened a new front in our bodies — under the skin, in the bloodstream, in the brain. This is unprecedented. Nothing like it has ever been seen before.

Eventually the Powers That Be will probably devise a way to insert the new nano-hardware and -software into us without our knowing it, but for the time being they still require our consent in order to get the needle into our arms.

They have persuaded, cajoled, bribed, threatened, and fooled just about everyone that they can. The remnant of unvaxed people are going to have to be coerced into being “dutiful”. Telling us that we’re murdering Grandma is simply not going to be enough.

No traditional method remains by which we might win this war. It’s become abundantly clear that voting is no help. Nor is writing letters to our elected representatives. The federal government has the means to ruin our lives, and it has made it abundantly clear that it won’t hesitate to do so. It has already rolled out some pretty big guns against us, and is holding some even bigger ones in reserve.

Armed citizens are able to resist to a certain extent, but the government has the means to ruin the lives of an isolated person and his family, even if they are armed. They can bust your [fundament] and cart you off in the big black armored vehicle to rot in solitary indefinitely.

Constitution? What’s a “constitution”? Never heard of it.

Being armed can work when enough armed people gather in solidarity with one another and act collectively. However, when the group becomes large enough, it gets infiltrated by federal informants and provocateurs, and gets rolled up by the government, as I have discussed in previous essays.

This can only begin to change when a large enough number of people have nothing left to lose. And the government is, of course, creating exactly those conditions with its latest heavy-handed repressive measures designed to force people to allow themselves to be injected with an experimental mRNA medical treatment. Those who resist and lose their jobs and become unemployable, who get evicted or have the bank foreclose on their homes, become people who have nothing left to lose.

This is why we lowly foot soldiers in the war need to wield the only weapon we have left, which is to say en masse: WE WILL NOT COMPLY.

It takes an ornery person to resist the kind of pressure we’re currently under. I consider myself ornery, but I’m under no illusions about how hard this may well become. I’ll see how long I can hold out.

The government is still holding its most fearsome weapons in reserve. It may well cut off Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security for citizens who refuse the vax. We may eventually be required to show a vax pass to enter federal state, and local government buildings, or health care facilities, or pharmacies, or even grocery stores. Banks and credit card companies may shut down the accounts of people who can’t prove they’ve been “vaccinated”.

We may be reduced to scavenging for scraps in dumpsters. Except, of course, peace officers will be stationed in the vicinity of all dumpsters to check our QR codes before we are allowed near the garbage.

All to keep us “safe”, mind you.

Continue reading

Thursday’s Vax and Corona Roundup

So much material related to the Wuhan Coronavirus has landed on my desk in the past few days that I’ve decided to stick a metaphorical finger down my digital throat and regurgitate the whole noxious mess in a single post.

Below are five videos and three articles about the dreaded Corona and the miraculous “vaccine” that promises to cure it, but only if 100% of the population is injected with as many shots and boosters as it takes.

The first video features an interview with a microbiologist in Quebec about healthcare workers who refuse to be “vaccinated” (and are now being suspended).

Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

The second video discusses the number of Italian soldiers who have refused to be vaxed, and compares it with the navy, the air force, the police, and the Carabinieri.

Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

In the third video a magistrate in Rome named Angelo Giorgianni denounces the “Green Pass”, promises a “new Nuremberg” for those who are pushing the vax, and says he will resign from the judiciary rather than abandon his stance.

Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

The fourth video features a young woman who attends university in Bologna. When she tried to enter a class without a “Green Pass” (the Italian vaccine passport), the professor insisted that she leave. When she refused, the professor cancelled the class.

Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

The final video may not even be Corona-related, but I’m including it here, just in case.

Eva-Maria Holzleitner is an Austrian MP for the Social Democrats who collapsed on Tuesday as she spoke in Parliament in Vienna. She is known to be a staunch advocate for the experimental mRNA injections used to treat COVID-19. There’s no information about how long ago she was vaxed, or whether the jab had anything to do with her swoon. Nor is there any word on her current condition.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

All three articles were translated by Hellequin GB. The first is from PolitikStube, and concerns a new “no jab, no food” rule in the German state of Hesse:

Continue reading