Covid-19, a Gift From the Gods

Our Dutch correspondent H. Numan has the latest on the endless political crisis in The Netherlands, which is exacerbated (or augmented, depending on one’s preference) by the endless coronavirus “pandemic”.

Covid-19, a gift from the gods

by H. Numan

You know who owes his position to the curse of China? Joe Biden. Without the Covid-19 pandemic he hadn’t a hope in hell of getting elected. The DNC smelled an opportunity and ran with it. By now Joe probably lacks the cognitive abilities to realize that. The man is declining rapidly. He isn’t the only one to benefit massively from the Covid crisis.

In Holland we had elections in the beginning of March. After that… nothing. Do the math: those elections were nine months ago. If you impregnated your wife on the eve of the elections, you’d be a proud father by now. I’m pretty sure we won’t find a new cabinet in our shoe on 5 December, and Father Christmas isn’t going to bring one, either. Why?

Our dearly beloved prime minister Mark Rutte ran three cabinets. It has never happened that a PM chaired four cabinets. He wants the distinction of becoming the longest-ruling Dutch PM ever. No matter the consequences. Like Biden, it doesn’t matter at all to him if he were to be rated the worst PM ever. As long as he gets the distinction of being the longest-ruling.

For him, the Covid-19 crisis is a blessing. He is ruling the country as demissionary PM, but with emergency powers, due to the crisis. Rutte openly said that he didn’t mind at having his cabinet resign. You can’t fire a cabinet that has already resigned. Now he can do more or less what he wants.

Negotiations are dragging on. Of course the results of the elections were almost impossible to work with. There was no clear winner. Rutte’s VVD party won, but that is looking at the numbers only. In reality he lost two seats. Not a lot, much less than the VVD deserves. The winner was the D66 party with Sigrid Al Qaq-Kaag. She did everything possible to become the new PM. Again, look at the numbers. Her party stands at a total of 24 seats. That’s much less than Rutte with 34 seats.

Her tactic was to gain a majority within the cabinet by inviting two socialist parties, PvdA (Labor) and GL (GreenLeft, ex-communists). That way D66 could form a block with PvdA and GL, outvoting the other coalition partners. In such a cabinet the VVD would be a minority party, despite having the most votes and the PM. Of course Rutte refused that; it just took many months before he did so.

Now they are muddling along to see if the present coalition can be extended. Why? Because nothing else will work. Geert Wilders did all right, but not overly so. He stands at 17 seats. A real conservative cabinet would require no less than seven parties, and that is simply not going to happen. So we will enter the new year without a new government. Rutte happily muddles along.

There’s another reason why Rutte is very happy with Covid-19: now he can ban fireworks. For decades this has been a hot political potato. A growing majority wants fireworks to be banned. A very vocal minority doesn’t. That very vocal minority ran amok in Rotterdam a week ago. Who? According to the police mostly hooligans. Add to that, juveniles with a phobia for pork and beer. Something the police forgot to mention.

Fireworks in The Netherlands can only be bought legally by anyone over 16 years from 12 December until 31 December. You can’t let them off; that is only legal on 31 December from 2pm until 1 January at 4am.The problem is, nobody abides by those rules. Lots of kids (usually boys) roam the streets during their Christmas break having fun with fireworks. Every year insurance companies have to pay out 30 to 70 million euros in damages. Every year all emergency services have to do overtime with every officer available to minimize havoc. Every year houses are burned to the ground and lots of people loose eyes and hands due to mishandling fireworks.

Every year lots of sellers are penalized for storing tons of unreliable fireworks insecurely. Very often a garden center or tobacconist makes some extra money by selling fireworks. Not outright to minors, but hey. If a bloke of 18 comes in surrounded by a bunch of kids of 10-12, what do you think? Storing a couple of tons of explosives in the attic or basement is pretty much standard.

Continue reading

The WHO Says: The Vax Doesn’t Work, So Mask Up, Everyone!

The communist who heads the World Health Organization has now acknowledged that people who have been injected with the experimental mRNA treatment that is intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus are not prevented from transmitting the disease to others. One might expect that the lesson to be learned is that the current Coronamadness (including the vax program) should be abandoned, but the WHO wants us to crank up the fear machine and do 2020 all over again.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Report24:

WHO also states: Vaccinated persons transmit virus, vaccinations do not end any measures

WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus made it clear at a press conference on Wednesday that the effect of the vaccination was being overestimated and that those who had been vaccinated would feel like they were in a false sense of security.

He explained that, according to the “data”, the transmission of Covid-19 through the vaccines has only been reduced by only 40% since the delta variant appeared. Where the data come from that the transmission is significantly reduced by the vaccination remains open: New data show that vaccinated and unvaccinated people are infectious to the same extent (and for the same length of time), and the narrative of the less “dangerous” vaccinated people accordingly collapses more and more. Either way, the WHO chief calls on people to continue to adhere to the protective measures imposed, regardless of their vaccination status.

He noted:

We are concerned about the false sense of security that the vaccines have ended the pandemic and that vaccinated people do not need to take any further precautions.

He is giving a clear rejection to militant vaccination advocates who believe that the compulsory vaccination of the entire population would magically eradicate Covid-19 and prevent further lockdowns.

The discrimination against the unvaccinated is therefore virtually devoid of any basis. The same was recently stated in an article published on November 20 in the renowned science magazine The Lancet entitled “Covid-19: Stigmatizing the unvaccinated is not justified” (Original: “Covid-19: stigmatising the unvaccinated is not justified”).

At the same time, the claim that vaccination protects against severe disease can be questioned: There are no reliable data for this, as doctors repeatedly criticize (see, for example, this article or this article).

Lies of Omission 2021

TL Davis has updated his important documentary “Lies of Omission” for 2021. The full movie may be watched on Rumble; see the links below.

Lies of Omission 2021

by TL Davis

Due to a technical problem with the file stored with the distributor we had to do an update on Lies of Omission. In review, there was so much good information still relevant on the film, especially in the wake of the 2020 election and the pandemic (plandemic/scamdemic), that we decided if we were going to go through the headache, why not update the film?

A “director’s cut” so to speak. We called it Lies of Omission 2021 and added, never-before-seen footage from the original interviews. At the same time, we went to a studio and enlisted the help of their staff to increase the production quality.

All in all, though a bit shorter, Lies of Omission 2021 is a better film with a cleaner storyline and smoother, better graphics. It tells a slightly different story from the original, too. What was relevant in 2017, is no longer, and what was not readily apparent, like tyranny and communism, is.

This issues are now openly recognized by a greater share of the world’s population. Governments worldwide have made Lies of Omission 2021 more relevant and with a much wider market than it ever would have had independently. It wasn’t until the governments demonstrated every aspect of communism and tyranny that it came into its own.

Just before the last quarterly report, Lies of Omission had been seen in 12 countries on 5 different channels. An increase in countries and channels from before. We think, with your help, it can finally be used for the red pill film it was intended to be.

It’s free on Rumble, but let the ads run to help us recoup a little bit of what is still in the red on this project. If you watch this version and agree that it’s much more polished than the original and equally as valuable, push it out to friends and family, share it on social media everywhere. Link it on your sites and help us get the word out.

The more views it gets and the longer the ads run, the better it is for us, but really, this is the sort of film right now that can truly make a difference. Of course, people still have to stand up for their rights, but we feel this offers enough of a consolidation of thought that it edges them ever closer to that position.

Hat tip: WRSA.

Double Vax Report

Below are two videos from Germany which feature very different opinions about the experimental mRNA treatment that is intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus.

Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translations, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling.

The first video features a young lady named Sarah Frühauf who offers her opinions on the television program Tagesschau for the state broadcaster ARD. Ms. Frühauf is quite strident and angry in her remarks about unvaxed people, who need to be punished for their insolence and selfishness in not allowing themselves to be jabbed by being forcibly “vaccinated”:

Nicolaus Fest is a member of the European Parliament for the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany). The second video shows excerpts from a brief speech given by Mr. Fest on the floor of the EP. His remarks concerning the “vaccine” are diametrically opposed to those of Sarah Frühauf:

Video transcript #1:

Continue reading

A Handgun Against an Army

The original version of following essay by the late Mike Vanderboegh was written before the turn of the millennium. Ten years later, when he wrote this revised version (posted at the old WRSA site), he noted that it had stood the test of time. Another thirteen years have passed since then, and as Spicy Time draws closer the relevance of his words is even greater.

At the suggestion of WRSA, I am reposting the entire essay here. To see the rest of the illustrations and the embedded video, visit the WRSA post.

A Handgun Against an Army — Ten Years After

by Mike Vanderboegh

July 29, 2008

Almost a decade ago now, I penned “A Letter From Hagood’s Crossroads, Alabama,” subtitled “What Good Can a Handgun Do Against an Army?”

Over the years it has proven to be the single most popular piece I have ever written. To this day, I get emails and snail mails from folks who have stumbled across it for the first time, thanking me for writing it. It is a humbling experience for a scribbler such as myself to realize that he has struck a chord in his audience — humbling and gratifying.

Still, I have always meant to rework “Handgun” to correct some of the minor errors and irritating flaws that always occur whenever you whip out a topical opinion piece, as I did this one. For example, one of the things that always bothered me was that I was forced to paraphrase Hopper explaining the facts of life to his marauding gang of ATF/biker/bandido grasshoppers in “A Bug’s Life.” In the re-issue below, I correct that. Indeed, thanks to technological advances in the intervening years, I am now able to give you the YouTube link so you can HEAR Hopper’s presentation of the dialectic of tyranny yourself with just a click of the mouse.

Incredible.

Another area requiring work was the wolf-sheep metaphor, which if I had just hewed to the wisdom of my grandpa imparted to me years ago would have more properly been (as I have corrected it below) a wolf-sheep-sheepdog metaphor. Don’t ask me why I did it that way the first time. I wrote it, as most of my pieces back then and since, at one sitting in the wee hours of the morning.

And equally importantly, without the steadying hand of a good editor. (Here, I tip my hat to my friend David Codrea.)

In truth, for something that has been so well received for so long, at the time I gave it no more thought or care than any of the other many things I wrote during the Era of the Clintonista-Militia Cold War. Yet it is “Handgun” that has, apparently, stood the test of time. I will explore why I think this is in the afterword to this reissue.

For now, let me present again, with slight updated revision, “What Good Can A Handgun Do Against an Army?,” with many thanks to my friends — Peter at Western Rifle Shooters Association and Chris at Mindful Musings — for the firm nudge prompting me to do so. — MBV

“What Good Can A Handgun Do Against an Army?”

A friend of mine forwarded me a question a friend of his had posed:

“If/when our Federal Government comes to pilfer, pillage, plunder our property and destroy our lives, what good can a handgun do against an army with advanced weaponry, tanks, missiles, planes, or whatever else they might have at their disposal to achieve their nefarious goals? (I’m not being facetious: I accept the possibility that what happened in Germany, or similar, could happen here; I’m just not sure that the potential good from an armed citizenry in such a situation outweighs the day-to-day problems caused by masses of idiots who own guns.)”

If I may, I’d like to try to answer that question. I certainly do not think the writer facetious for asking it. The subject is a serious one to which I have given much research and considerable thought. I believe that upon the answer to this question depends the future of our Constitutional republic, our liberty and perhaps our lives.

My friend Aaron Zelman, one of the founders of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, told me once:

“If every Jewish and anti-nazi family in Germany had owned a Mauser rifle and twenty rounds of ammunition AND THE WILL TO USE IT (emphasis supplied — MBV), Adolf Hitler would be a little-known footnote to the history of the Weimar Republic.”

Note well that phrase: “and the will to use it,” for the simply-stated question, “What good can a handgun do against an army?” is in fact a complex one and must be answered at length and carefully.

It is a military question.

It is also a political question.

But above all it is a moral question which strikes to the heart of what makes men free, and what makes them slaves.

First, let’s answer the military question.

Most military questions have both a strategic and a tactical component. Let’s first consider the tactical.

A friend of mine owns an instructive piece of history. It is a small, crude pistol [see the image at the top of this post], made out of sheet-metal stampings by the U.S. during World War II. While it fits in the palm of your hand and is a slowly-operated, single-shot arm, its powerful .45 caliber projectile will kill a man with brutal efficiency. With a short, smooth-bore barrel it can reliably kill only at point blank ranges, so its use requires the will (brave or foolhardy) to get in close before firing. It is less a soldier’s weapon than an assassin’s tool. The U.S. manufactured them by the millions during the war, not for our own forces but rather to be air-dropped behind German lines to resistance units in occupied Europe and Asia. They cost exactly two dollars and ten cents to make.

Crude and slow (the fired case had to be knocked out of the breech by means of a little wooden dowel, a fresh round procured from the storage area in the grip and then manually reloaded and cocked. It was so wildly inaccurate it couldn’t hit the broad side of a French barn at 50 meters, but to the Resistance man or woman who had no firearm it still looked pretty darn good.

The theory and practice of it was this: First, you approach a German sentry with your little pistol hidden in your coat pocket and, with Academy-award sincerity, ask him for a light for your cigarette (or the time the train leaves for Paris, or if he wants to buy some non-army-issue food or a half-hour with your “sister”). When he smiles and casts a nervous glance down the street to see where his Sergeant is, you blow his brains out with your first and only shot, then take his rifle and ammunition. Your next few minutes are occupied with “getting out of Dodge,” for such critters generally go around in packs. After that (assuming you evade your late benefactor’s friends) you keep the rifle and hand your little pistol to a fellow Resistance fighter so he can go get his own rifle.

Or, maybe, you then use your rifle to get a submachine gun from the Sergeant when he comes running. Perhaps you get very lucky and pick up a light machine gun, two boxes of ammunition and a haversack of hand grenades. With two of the grenades and the expenditure of a half-a-box of ammunition at a hasty roadblock the next night, you and your friends get a truck full of arms and ammunition. (Some of the cargo is sticky with “Boche” blood, but you don’t mind, not terribly.)

Continue reading

Setback for the Great Reset

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from PolitikStube:

Death threats: WEF cancels public meetings in Davos

At the next World Economic Forum in Davos (Switzerland) in January 2022, the public sessions will be canceled due to death threats. These may have come from the scene of Conspiracy Believers, Conspiracy Ideologues, Conspiracy Theorists and Querdenker [lateral thinkers] who not only deny the coronavirus, but also fantasize about a New World Order. Are these death threats actually coming from all of these conspiracy fanatics, or is it just an allegation to defame an entire movement and the unvaccinated?

Conspiracy theories? So some have been uncovered in recent times in reality and through facts, time and again, because the virus has sprung from a laboratory (bred?) in Wuhan.

“The New World Order” —former US President George Herbert Walker Bush spoke about it in 1991, and saw this as a great idea.

The web pages of the WEF hold a multitude of visions of horror that are sold as progressiveness. And too often they come true, if one only thinks of Event 201, the joint simulation game run by the WEF and the Gates Foundation, in which “the pandemic” was war-gamed before it broke out. One such vision is the transhuman human being — “The Internet of the Body” will change our lives, explains the WEF. Body data are supposed to be collected via “implanted, swallowed or worn” devices. For this, data protection should be “overcome”.

Mirror Online:

There will be no public meetings at the next World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland in January. The decision was made because there have recently been repeated death threats from conspiracy ideologues against employees of the World Economic Forum, report several Swiss media.

“Death threats are the order of the day; it became uncomfortable,” says WEF Director Alois Zwinggi. “We couldn’t imagine that we would end up in the crosshairs of conspiracy theorists.” There are several dozens of such cases every day.

In “lateral thinker” circles and among other conspiracy believers, a story about the World Economic Forum has been widespread since the beginning of the pandemic. Accordingly, the coronavirus is either not real at all or has only been bred so that supposedly secret societies and elites can strive for an authoritarian world government — the “New World Order”. The name of the alleged new world order is closely linked to the World Economic Forum: The forum announced the “Great Reset” initiative to encourage the community of states to cooperate more closely and to improve climate protection after the pandemic.

Herstory Repeats Itself as Farce

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from Il Giornale:

In Europe, it is forbidden to say “Christmas” and even to call oneself Maria

November 28, 2021

The internal document of the European Commission: No to the use of “Miss” or “Mr.”, just religious references and Christian names

by Francesco Giubilei

If they had told us, and we had not read it in black and white in an official communication from the European Commission, we wouldn’t have believed it because the contents of the new guidelines for “inclusive communication” are incredible. In a document for internal circulation, of which Il Giornale has come in exclusive possession, entitled “Union of Equality, European Commission Guidelines for Inclusive Communication,” the criteria being adopted by members of the Commission in external and internal communication are laid out. As written in the foreword, the Commissioner for Equality, Helena Dalli: “We must always offer an inclusive communication, ensuring thus that everyone is appreciated and recognized in all of our material, independent of gender, race, or ethnic origin, religion, or creed, disability, age, or sexual orientation.”

To accomplish this, the European Commission lays out a series of rules that don’t just cancel conventions and words frequently used, but also contradict common sense. It is forbidden to use common words such as “workers” or “policemen”, or use the masculine pronoun as a predefined pronoun. It is forbidden to organize discussions with only one gender represented (only men or only women), and furthermore, it is forbidden to use “Miss or Mrs.” except to make it explicit to whom the communication is being addressed. But that’s not all: You cannot open a conference addressing the public with the usual expression, “Ladies and Gentlemen,” but must use the formally neutral “Dear Colleagues”.

The document focuses on specific areas such as “gender”, “LGBTIQ”, “racial and ethnic” themes, or “cultures, lifestyles, and beliefs” with a table indicating what can and can’t be done, based on the intent to regulate everything, creating a new language that doesn’t allow for spontaneity: “Make sure not to always mention the same gender first in word order, or to address men and women differently (for example, a man by family name and a woman by first name).” And further, “When choosing images to accompany your communication, make sure that women and children are not represented in a domestic setting or in passive roles while the men are active and adventurous.”

A desire to cancel the male and female genders reaches paradoxical levels when the Commission writes that it is necessary to avoid expressions such as “Fire is the greatest invention of man,” but it is correct to say, “Fire is the greatest invention of humanity.” It is obvious that behind the redefinition of language lies the desire to change European society, our customs and traditions, as seen in the chapter dedicated to “culture, lifestyle, or beliefs.” The European Commission wants to emphasize “avoiding assuming that everyone is Christian” since “not everyone celebrates the Christmas holidays […] it is necessary to be sensitive to the fact that people have different religious traditions.” There is, however, an enormous difference between respect for all religions and being ashamed of or canceling the Christian roots that are at the base of Europe and of our identity.

In the name of inclusivity, the European Commission goes so far as to cancel Christmas, suggesting that the phrase, “the Christmas period can be stressful” not be used; rather it should be said “The vacation period can be stressful.” A desire to eliminate Christianity that goes further with the recommendation to use generic names instead of “Christian names”, so instead of “Maria and Joseph are an international couple,” you need to say, “Malika and Giulio are an international couple.” The contempt verges on the ridiculous when it requires us to counter the negative connotation of words such as colonialism: It is forbidden to say “the colonization of Mars” or “human settlement of Mars”; it is better to use “send humans to Mars.” When tragedy gives way to farce.

Fines, Forced Vax — But Maybe No Piano Wire

German officials are discussing various options concerning citizens who resist being injected with the experimental mRNA treatment. So far, they have limited their options to fines and forced “vaccinations”.

So far.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from PolitikStube:

Constitutional lawyer on compulsory vaccination: Imprisonment and forced vaccination possible for those unwilling to vaccinate

The Göttingen constitutional lawyer Alexander Thiele believes that a compulsory vaccination is conceivable in order to implement a possible general Corona vaccination obligation. “The possibilities start with a fine, but imprisonment or forced vaccination are also possible,” Thiele told the newspapers of the Funke media group. It is not the aim of a general vaccination requirement that rich people can buy themselves out of compulsion. “The state is not as defenseless as it sounds.”

The decision concerning the consequences of refusing the vaccination is a political one, said the lawyer. This debate must take place in Parliament. “Because the course of the fourth wave does not depend on a compulsory vaccination, we also have the necessary time to think about it and to debate it.”

The constitutional lawyer Christian Pestalozza, for example, considers fines and, in the case of repeated violations, high penalty payments to be possible; as a last step, foreclosure must also be considered. “That means that someone is brought before the vaccination doctor by the police.” In a democracy, however, it shouldn’t get to that point.

Source: Editorial Network Germany

Politik Stube:

Constitutional lawyers who are loyal to the regime and who ignore the principles of proportionality, necessity and appropriateness in the interests of politics, as well as the questionable effectiveness of the “vaccination” plague.

The main thing is that the number of strokes has increased, more threats and psychological terror every day, but pressure, as is well known, also creates counter-pressure.

Afterword from the translator:

These politicians and their puppet-masters seem to think, like all tyrants before them, that they are immune to all because of their power, but they always forget the one simple truth that all tyrants had to learn the hard way: when you make a people desperate enough, there’s no telling what horrors they’re capable of.

Also, their power is the cage within which they eventually will be butchered.

Bury my Heart at Howard Springs

Update: A reader in Australia sends the following clarification about Howard Springs:

Howard Springs is not a ‘quarantine camp’ but rather an evacuation camp in keeping with a long held strategy to remove certain elements of society to safety in the event of war, civil unrest or in this case, disease. These plans have been in place in one shape or form since the close of WW2.

Over the last two years a large concentration health camp has been established in Howard Springs, Australia. It was constructed as a facility to quarantine Australians who returned from overseas during the early days of the COVID-19 lockdowns, and has been expanded since for the internment of unvaccinated citizens and those who test positive for the Wuhan Coronavirus, plus their families and contacts.

Most recently the Australian army (ADF) has been tasked with rounding up people who have been identified as risks and transporting them to Howard Springs.

A longtime reader who uses the handle “the lone rider” sends this brief summary of what is happening at the Howard Springs camp, and its larger ramifications:

I thought people should know of the potential connections with Howard Springs. This goes beyond Covid to the whole central planning/climate agenda and is very worrisome.

Recent news that 38 people were taken by soldiers to the Howard Springs camp in Australia is alarming.

What is more alarming is the puffy prose surrounding the ‘sustainability’ and ‘stylish’ and ‘innovative’ nature of this ‘village’. The group that runs the Howard Springs camp for the Australian government, AECOM, has business interests from Dubai to California ports. Their website touts “delivering a better world through program management” and “Delivering sustainable legacies, our environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategy.” This company is on board with Agenda 2030 for sure, and the buzzwords of that top-down central planning agenda are front and center on its website. They specifically support and are involved in the COP26 climate summit Biden just attended recently.

It should be worrisome that the President of the United States is attending a summit supported by a corporation which manages concentration camps.

This should not only be worrisome, it also makes one wonder: are these camps are merely detention centers to threaten people with for purposes of control during the Covid situation, or worse, are they a model which the government — in Australia or elsewhere — intends to foist on society at large and everyone outside the camp walls, leaning on the excuse of climate change? The explicit touting of COP26 and the ‘sustainability’ agenda on the website of the corporation who runs the camp makes this link even more clear and alarming.

Michael Gunner is the premier of Northern Territory, the Australian state where the Howard Springs camp is located. Mr. Gunner has made a name for himself as the most dictatorial and fascist of Australia’s premiers, and that’s quite an accomplishment in a country where so many pocket Hitlers are currently terrorizing their captive citizens.

In the following video Mr. Gunner makes it clear that anyone who is pro-freedom must be considered anti-vax.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this clip:

On multiple occasions Michael Gunner has spoken about the co-operation of members of the aboriginal community in Northern Territory, who are the ostensible beneficiaries of his forcible relocation policies.

In the following video (hat tip Conservative Tree House), a spokesman for a group of aborigines begs to differ with Mr. Gunner. He maintains that the ADF is not just relocating people against their will, but is also coercing them into being vaccinated. Furthermore, he asserts that foreign soldiers and police officers are included in the squads that roust people out of their homes and take them to the camp:

I don’t need to remind you that what is currently underway in the totalitarian dystopia that Australia has become is a dry run for what will eventually happen in the country formerly known as the United States of America. One important fact to take note of is that Australians are by and large unarmed, but the same is not true of American citizens.

This is a distinction which may eventually make a difference when Spicy Time arrives in earnest.

Austria Banishes the Unclean

Freddie Sayers is a British journalist and the Executive Editor of UnHerd. The following video featuring him was recorded in Austria after the mandatory lockdown for the unvaxed was announced, but before the government decided to mandate the COVID “vaccine” for everyone.

In his on-the-street interviews, Mr. Sayers discovers that middle-class and upper-middle-class Viennese citizens are keen to tighten the screws on citizens who refuse the jab. Blue-collar workers, however, are less enthusiastic. In a consensus society like Austria’s, overt resistance against the zeitgeist is difficult, but working-class citizens seem to be moving in that direction.

In one interview you’ll notice that a member of the governing class decries the political exploitation by the “far right” of the lockdown measure. This is a frequent refrain from the Left: conservatives are not allowed to “politicize” a contentious issue to gain partisan advantage. The Left, however, can politicize anything it wants. In fact, it does nothing else: everything is politicized, and with a leftist slant. One presumes that the gentleman being interviewed is unable to perceive such politicization, since that is the water the ruling class swims in.

Hat tip: Bastet.

A Roundup of Corona News From Germany

Below are three recent COVID-related articles from German media outlets, all translated by Hellequin GB.

The first article is from PolitikStube, and concerns the proposed implementation of compulsory “vaccination”:

Constitutional lawyer on compulsory vaccination: Imprisonment and forced vaccination possible for those unwilling to vaccinate

The Göttingen constitutional lawyer Alexander Thiele believes that a compulsory vaccination is conceivable in order to implement a possible general Corona vaccination obligation. “The possibilities start with a fine, but imprisonment or forced vaccination are also possible,” Thiele told the newspapers of the Funke media group. It is not the aim of a general vaccination requirement that rich people can buy themselves out of compulsion. “The state is not as defenseless as it sounds.”

The decision concerning the consequences of refusing the vaccination is a political one, said the lawyer. This debate must take place in Parliament. “Because the course of the fourth wave does not depend on a compulsory vaccination, we also have the necessary time to think about it and to debate it.”

The constitutional lawyer Christian Pestalozza, for example, considers fines and, in the case of repeated violations, high penalty payments to be possible; as a last step, foreclosure must also be considered. “That means that someone is brought before the vaccination doctor by the police.” In a democracy, however, it shouldn’t get to that point.

Source: Editorial Network Germany

Politik Stube:

Constitutional lawyers who are loyal to the regime and who ignore the principles of proportionality, necessity and appropriateness in the interests of politics, as well as the questionable effectiveness of the “vaccination” plague.

The main thing is that the number of strokes has increased, more threats and psychological terror every day, but pressure, as is well known, also creates counter-pressure.

Afterword from the translator:

These politicians and their puppet-masters seem to think, like all tyrants before them, that they are immune to all because of their power, but they always forget the one simple truth that all tyrants had to learn the hard way: when you make a people desperate enough, there’s no telling what horrors they’re capable of.

Also, their power is the cage in which they eventually will be butchered.

The second article, from the RTL television network, concerns the erosion of police effectiveness in Saxony as a result of COVID-19:

Continue reading

Time to Panic About the Regularly Scheduled Corona Variant

Early last summer I predicted that a new Corona “variant” would appear around Thanksgiving, prompting a new surge of restrictions, lockdowns, etc., and inevitably another “vaccine”.

The reason for the timing was twofold, at least in the USA. First of all, the new restrictions needed to be postponed until after the gubernatorial and municipal elections, because widespread discontent created by the new anti-COVID measures would disadvantage incumbents in Democrat-held cities.

The second — and more important — reason is that there was a lull in Corona infections over the summer, bit a surge was to be expected in the late fall, just as there was with the seasonal flu before the flu disappeared, as people move indoors for the winter months. Under those circumstances, the increasing number of cases, accompanied by the alarming graphs with rising red lines, can be employed to present gullible viewers with evidence that the dreaded Corona is raging through the population again. Contagion hysteria can be whipped up to accompany the rollout of the new mutation, so that when the new “vaccine” becomes available, people will beg to be jabbed with it.

Well, the new variant has arrived, right on schedule. It allegedly originated in South Africa. Travel restrictions have been imposed in major countries. Fear porn is being ginned up in the media. And Pfizer says that it will have a vaccine ready in about a hundred days, which — surprise! — will coincide with the arrival of spring, when the number of cases can be expected to drop with the end of flu Corona season, and the vax will get the credit.

So everybody gets vaxed, the rules are relaxed, and then this time next year the next variant magically appears, so that the same scam can be repeated indefinitely until the time is ripe for the Great Reset to be unveiled.

At the time the article below was written, the only label for new variant was the cumbersome “Mutant B.1.1.529”. Today, however, the boffins officially christened it “Omicron”, which will roll off the tongue nicely during the coming propaganda push. Omicron is resistant to all existing vaccines, so I presume that obedient citizens will have their “fully vaccinated” status revoked and be placed under onerous restrictions until the new needles are ready for everybody’s arms.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from :
German-language news portal Report24. Note: this was written before travel restrictions began:

The alleged danger of the South African mutant — travel routes open as always

Civil defense has known a clear protocol for dangerous epidemics for decades: close travel routes. In the case of the alleged Corona pandemic, this happened neither in the spring of 2020, nor is it happening now, when a terribly dangerous mutation from South Africa is allegedly threatening the world. As mainstream media roared the red alert, planes from South Africa landed all over the world . The media pandemic is apparently going on happily. And the numbers from South Africa are — to put it politely — “strange”.

A comment by Willi Huber

Personal acquaintances of the author report from South Africa that the virus is virtually non-existent there. Only about 5% of the population has been vaccinated. The self-perception does not quite match the perception of others. According to official data, 23.8 percent of the approximately 60 million South Africans are said to have been vaccinated. In total, around 90,000 deaths from or with Covid-19 have been recorded. To what extent the data can be trusted is unclear, because the country is likely to far surpass even Austria in terms of corruption.

Lauterbach flashes red, Soros media see the “world in fear”

In South Africa, from November 22 to 23, 18,586 new “cases” were suddenly reported in the international systems. Such a rapid increase is unlikely to be right, especially because the numbers were put into perspective on the following days. Quite coincidentally, these shock numbers came at the same time as international reports about a new virus mutant with the provisional name “Mutant B.1.1.529”. Corona crybaby Karl Lauterbach “warns”, the Handelsblatt (member of the George Soros media synchronization club “Project Syndicate”) sees “The World in Fear”. Interestingly, it is always the same players who first scream “fire” and generate drama.

However, despite all the fear and panic, what once again does not happen is the unwinding of the normal civil defense protocols. Closing all travel routes to the affected areas. If it were indeed a dangerous virus, law enforcement agencies would have to take action now. Because that is a deliberate threat to the public. The Handelsblatt explains in a relaxed manner:

Lufthansa is maintaining the flight connections to South Africa for the time being. “We are implementing the requirements and will continue to fly, also to bring people home and transport freight,” said a company spokesman. Lufthansa is closely monitoring the situation and complying with all legal requirements and rules.

Fifteen minutes ago , the news came that the German government wants to at least restrict travel routes. However, only from “Sunday night”. Until then, you can “spread” diligently.

The Federal Ministry of Health announced that the country will be considered a virus variant area from Saturday night. “As a result, airlines are only allowed to carry German citizens to Germany.” In addition, all those who have entered would have to be in quarantine for 14 days — even if they are fully vaccinated.

And although Lauterbach and the system media already know exactly how dangerous the new mutation is, the World Health Organization (WHO) is only now starting its investigations and has not yet published a specific statement on the danger.

Continue reading

Don’t Mention the War!

The situation in Austria is devolving to full totalitarian at an astonishing rate. First the authorities ordered a full lockdown of all “unvaccinated” citizens. Shortly afterwards they announced that mandatory vaccination (backed by threats of fines and/or imprisonment) would be imposed as of February 1, 2022.

To add insult to injury, by law Austrians are forbidden to compare the current political situation to the Nazi dictatorship, because that would “trivialize National Socialism”.

Citizens of Austria have no choice: they must experience the same thing all over again.

Below are three articles about the current situation in Austria, all translated by Hellequin GB. The first article, from the Austrian news portal Report24, concerns protests by health care workers:

Austria’s health workers against compulsory vaccination: We are laying down our tools!

Thousands of employees in the Austrian health system have already networked and jointly wrote an open letter to Health Minister [Wolfgang] Mückstein, in which they urgently warn that they will not endorse the government’s harassment against unvaccinated people. The decision for or against the Covid vaccination is of a personal nature and must remain so. The authors call for a change of course — if this does not happen, be prepared to stop work and strike collectively: “We are many and we will make our voices heard!”

Consistent resistance pays off: In Quebec, Canada, the compulsory vaccination for health workers has already been withdrawn. Worldwide there are increasing warnings from trade unions that the installation of a compulsory vaccination will lead to collapse not only in health care, but also in other essential areas such as the emergency services. The employees have the longer lever — because ultimately the security and supply of the population depend on them. Austrian health workers are sending an overly clear warning signal to politicians with their open letter. The MFG [Upper Austrian party Menschen Freiheit Grundrechte, People — Freedom — Fundamental Rights] also sent it as an attachment to its own letter to Health Minister Mückstein — you can read it here: ‘MFG clarifies in a letter to Mückstein: Compulsory vaccination is unconstitutional!’

It really looks like this!

We healthcare workers turn to you in complete disbelief in view of the latest measures you decided to take. As employees of a social area, which the health system now represents, we feel obliged to draw attention to human grievances.

We healthcare workers have been working hard and inhuman hours for some time. Many of us are already at our psychological and physical limits. It is we who have been compensating for all the shortcomings that the personnel situation has had for a long time, and who are constantly doing service beyond our extent of employment. This is a condition that was already prevalent before the Covid pandemic and has only increased in intensity as a result.

Discrimination and bullying from the highest levels

As a thank you for this, you are now promoting a split in society as a whole, which has also found its way into the health sector. A split that leads to employees who have carried out their work for years with passion and the greatest dedication are now degraded to second-class employees. You are now publicly discrediting a large part of a professional group that was recently applauded. We are deeply ashamed to watch the way discrimination and bullying find the tolerance of the highest authorities and are ultimately even fueled by them. We strictly refuse to participate in discrimination against groups of people who think differently just because it takes place under the guise of solidarity.

The way out of the split can never be to put one opinion over the other. Only mutual acceptance can represent our solution for a peaceful coexistence. Social diversity should also be your goal, because only from this emerge the values which our society should actually stand up for. The decision for or against a vaccination is and must remain the personal decision of each individual. Forcing this decision indirectly or directly lacks any sense of empathic and democratic behavior.

If vaccination is compulsory: strike!

We represent values that do not coincide with such compulsion and should have no place in a society like ours, values that you are currently trampling on. We follow our understanding of a united society in which there is neither discrimination against individual groups of people nor bullying, and we strongly defend ourselves against the mandatory vaccination imposed by them and all other measures that aim to create an indirect mandatory vaccination, be it in the health care system or elsewhere in our society.

We have found countless like-minded people in our professional area, or to put it more clearly, we have networked. So now we know: WE ARE MANY and we will make ourselves heard. All of us are also ready to resign from our duties and to go on strike in order to give our demands emphasis, because we feel compelled to put an end to these inhumane conditions which, among other things, have been taking over our workplaces for some time. Many of us will turn our backs on this profession rather than bow to your instructions. How is it possible that something like this can be provoked in an area in which chronic staff shortages have been known for years?

We stand up against the discrimination against us as employees in the health care system, but also against the patients entrusted to us and against society as a whole.

We say NO and demand an end to the harassment
We (8659) health care workers from Austria

The second article from Krone discusses a proposed special tax to be paid by unvaccinated citizens, modeled on the tobacco tax:

Continue reading

Forget the Jews, Blame the Unvaxed!

The speaker in the following video is Daniel Trappe, a retired Senior Public Prosecutor in Germany.

Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading