A Report From Martin Sellner on His Arrest in Switzerland

I reported yesterday on the arrest of Martin Sellner, the leader of Identitarian Movement Austria (Identitäre Bewegung Österreich, IBÖ), whose event in Switzerland was shut down by police. Since then he has been released, but is being forced to leave the canton where he was arrested.

Mr. Sellner recorded the following video just before he was deported from the canton of Aargau to the canton of Zürich. Many thanks to Brunhilde for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Whatever You Do, Don’t Mention “Remigration”

Martin Sellner is the leader of Identitarian Movement Austria (Identitäre Bewegung Österreich, IBÖ). Yesterday, during a visit to Switzerland, Mr. Sellner’s event was shut down and he was arrested, all because he advocates remigration — that is, the deportation of illegal immigrants.

Mr. Sellner posted about the incident on Twitter (in English):

Today the police in the Kanton of Aargau, Switzerland stormed a speech, turned off the electricity, handcuffed me and performed a push back. I am not allowed to enter Aargau for 2 months. The reason?

  • I presented my book about #remigration. The police claimed that this presentation was a danger to Swiss security and public order.
  • According to the police, it was the first push back like this in 10 years, while 50.000 Illegals entered the country in 2023!
  • This is a disgrace to Swiss democracy. But it still is a win for our movement. They can handcuff me, but not our ideas. Remigration is inevitable!

The following video shows what happened when the event was raided by the police. Many thanks to Oz-Rita and Brunhilde for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling.

Note: the audio in the original is of very poor quality. The translators agreed that the text of their translation should not be considered absolutely reliable:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

When Islamization Deniers Celebrate Islamization

A previous version of this essay was first published in Norwegian at the website Document.no.

When Islamization Deniers Celebrate Islamization

by Fjordman

On March 10, 2024, the municipality of Oslo in Norway lit large Ramadan light displays for the first time outside the City Hall.[1] Predictably, the Islam-friendly state broadcaster NRK portrayed this as a positive step towards more diversity and tolerance.[2]

They did not mention that Ramadan is also a period of intensified Jihad, Islamic holy war. Ramadan is often marked by deadly Islamic attacks against non-Muslims.

March 12, 2024, marked the start of trial against Zaniar Matapour. He is the Islamic terrorist behind the attack in central Oslo on June 25, 2022, where two people were killed and 21 injured. 19 shots were fired before civilians managed to overpower the perpetrator.[3] During the trial, Oslo City Hall is decorated to celebrate the Islamic fasting month of Ramadan. Less than two years after Matapour’s deadly Jihadist attack, the city of Oslo thus publicly celebrates the ideology behind the terror attack, a few hundred meters away from the crime scene.

Before carrying out his deadly attack, Zaniar Matapour is said to have become “markedly more religious.”[4] He also pledged allegiance to the Jihadist terrorist organization known as the Islamic State (IS or ISIS).

The Ramadan lights in Oslo are said to mimic similar celebrations in London. But is British society really something to emulate today? Britain now resembles a broken nation, already partially on its knees to Islam, while persecuting individuals brave enough to speak this truth out loud.

When the author Melanie Phillips described the Islamization of British society in her 2006 book Londonistan, critics accused her of exaggerating. She didn’t.

Haitham al-Haddad, a British Islamic jurist and the chair of the Fatwa Committee for the Islamic Council of Europe, said in a panel discussing Muslims in the West in 2023 that the situation of Muslims in the West is a lot better than it was 20 years earlier. He said that if you go outside, you might think you are in a “second Afghanistan,” but it is in fact “Londonistan.” Al-Haddad said that Muslims in the West should not consider themselves a “subjected minority,” because they are the “leaders of humanity.”[5]

Under its Muslim mayor Sadiq Khan, London has become an increasingly crime-ridden city where white Britons are a shrinking minority. Muslim rape gangs have operated in many British cities for years and continue to do so.[6]

In January 2024, the Gay and pro-Israeli MP Mike Freer announced that he would not seek re-election at the next UK election due to concerns for his personal safety, following threats and attacks by militant Muslims.[7]

His fear was not unfounded. A Jihadist supporting the Islamic State (IS) terrorist group murdered the Conservative MP David Amess on October 15, 2021.[8] The terrorist had also considered attacking Freer.

Thousands of Muslims have publicly demonstrated in London and other cities in sympathy with the terrorist organization Hamas.[9] Pro-Palestinian Muslims have been so aggressive in confronting individual politicians that Prime Minister Rishi Sunak warned British police chiefs in February 2024 that “mob rule is replacing democratic rule.”[10] At the same time, the public is also warned against the alleged dangers of so-called Islamophobia.

Prime Minister Sunak denied that his party has “Islamophobic tendencies.”[11] He said comments made by Conservative politician Lee Anderson were unacceptable, and he was therefore suspended from the party. Anderson stated that the Mayor of London was under the control of Islamists.[12] Sadiq Khan described the comments as racist and Islamophobic, and that they would “pour fuel on the fire of anti-Muslim hatred.”

The Islam-critical Dutch politician Geert Wilders has been living under constant police protection for the past two decades. He has described this in his book Marked for Death: Islam’s War Against the West and Me.

Other Islam-critical politicians such as Filip Dewinter in Belgium have also been subjected to harassment and planned assassination attempts.[13]

More and more European writers, intellectuals, artists, politicians, and ordinary citizens are threatened by militant Muslims. A veil of censorship and Islamic threats, an Iron Burka, is descending upon Western Europe.

People who ask critical questions regarding claims about man-made climate change risk being labelled “climate deniers.” Perhaps we should rather introduce a new term that is more appropriate: Islamization deniers.

Continue reading

German Comedian Says: Bash the Fash!

It seems the German establishment is moving closer to a ban on the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany). A regime toady in the media is encouraging violence against “right-wing extremists” — a necessary step in the direction of a full ban on the party. Demonize first, then attack, and finally outlaw it: that’s the game plan.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the online news portal Nius. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Kerkeling uses children’s films to glorify violence against right-wingers: “Ready to fight! You can’t end fascism through discussion!”

He wrote “I’ll be off then” and is afraid of “He’s back”!

In an interview with the news portal t-online, the German comedian Hape Kerkeling speaks of his fear that the AfD would turn Germany into a “dictatorship” after an election victory and thinks out loud about the fact that, beyond words and arguments, people “must be ready to fight.”

Kerkeling wants to ban the AfD

Kerkeling advocates banning the AfD as a lesson from history: “It should be avoidable today to allow the right to come to power in the first place. All I hear is that it would be too risky to ban this party. I find this argument to be downright grotesque. We have a basic law and that is clear. The legislature wanted to prevent the Federal Republic of Germany from ever becoming a dictatorship again. We are now faced with the problem, with the real possibility that Germany will become a dictatorship and within a very short period of time. The situation has never been so risky. Why don’t we try to ban the party?”

Given the rise of Alice Weidel’s AfD, Kerkeling sees the “real possibility” that Germany will become a dictatorship. [Says one that has been part and parcel of establishing another socialist dictatorship in Germany. Shows you again that these people that live close by the manger have only their own overflowing feeding frenzy trough at heart.]

Kerkeling does not differentiate between right-wing and right-wing extremists; he consistently speaks of “right-wingers,” which he would also fight against: “Because that is the enemy that can be identified most clearly at the moment. So defensive force used judiciously would be directed against them.” [Well, haven’t they already established their own brand of violent brown-shirts for decades and call them “Anti-fascists” to gull the gullible?]

There would be “fundamental truths and values” in Germany that everyone would have agreed on. “That must always be the basis of our society. I can no longer reach anyone who strays from this with rhetoric. But there are other means, tried and tested means. History has shown what the effective means are. In any case, I can’t remember fascism ever being ended through discussion.” [Then I would advise him to do us all a favour and blow his “brain” out in front of a mirror if he wants to kill fascists.]

Continue reading

Kiddie Snitches

When I was in junior high school back in the early 1960s, we were taught about children in East Germany who were encouraged by the authorities to report their parents for counterrevolutionary activity. The kids would tell their teachers, the teachers would notify the Stasi, and the unmarked van would show up in the dead of night to carry the offending parent away.

Sixty years later, it appears that the intelligence services of the German Federal Republic are honoring their predecessors in the DDR. Children, beware: Your parents may be far-right extremists!

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the online news portal Nius. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Be careful what you say at home…

The Office for the Protection of the Constitution calls on schoolchildren to “report right-wing content”

On February 28th, Deutschlandfunk published a report from the program Agenda with Jörg Müller, the head of the Brandenburg Office for the Protection of the Constitution, about the right-wing danger in social media and gaming. The focus of this article is the large reach that the AfD achieves on TikTok. The audience does not find out exactly what potentially dangerous content is involved.

Müller reports on his visits to schools: “I ask every school class, how often have you actually reported a right-wing video? Often this isn’t done and then I get a response a few weeks later that they have now reported videos.”

What this means is that children are actually encouraged to report and are later asked whether they have complied with Müller’s request. The extent to which schoolchildren can classify political content and evaluate whether it is justiciable is not discussed.

TikTok may only be used from the age of 13 and only with parental consent. The app also offers special security measures for minors that can be activated. Wouldn’t it then be the responsibility of parents to take action against questionable content in case of doubt?

Müller encourages reports below the criminal liability threshold

“What should you report if no crime has occurred?” the moderator wants to know from the head of the Brandenburg Office for the Protection of the Constitution [Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz, BfV, Germany’s domestic intelligence agency]. He emphasizes once again that he asks the children to use the reporting function diligently; after all it is easy to use: “You just have to tap! And I would always recommend doing that,” says Müller, referring to the “incitement and hate speech” reporting centers at the state criminal investigation offices and the Federal Criminal Police Office.

Schoolchildren are manipulated

The Office for the Protection of the Constitution monitors extremist accounts on social networks and it is therefore the authority’s job to take action against content that is punishable. Müller does not seem to know in detail which guidelines the networks use to censor content. He relies on mass reporting: “I actually believe that companies also have their own counting methods. The technology has also intervened there and if channels are reported often enough, then they are blocked, deleted or at least the content is searched.

One cannot help but get the impression that schoolchildren are being used to remove political opponents from social media. This is apparently best achieved with mass reporting and this requires numerous users, in this case schoolchildren, to eagerly report content.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

Where Should Europeans Flee To When Our Countries Have Been Destroyed?

An earlier version of this essay was first published in Norwegian at the website Document.no.

Where Should Europeans Flee To When Our Countries Have Been Destroyed?

by Fjordman

The national conservative government in Hungary has been under pressure from the EU for years because they oppose large-scale non-European immigration.

The Hungarians point out that the EU’s immigration policies create insecurity and instability in many European countries. By admitting large numbers of illegal immigrants each year, the EU also encourages continued large non-European immigration to Europe.

Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó stated on February 13, 2024, that a radical change of EU immigration policy is necessary in order to protect Europeans and their safety. Brussels’ open migration policy creates a real danger of “Europeans losing Europe,” he claimed.[1]

Unfortunately, this is not an exaggeration. If current trends continue, Europe may effectively cease to be the homeland of Europeans.

I have previously written that the migrations we are experiencing now are the largest and fastest in all of human history. In scope, they far surpass the so-called Migration Period which we associate with the fall of the Western Roman Empire.[2]

In Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, we were also largely dealing with migration within Europe. Now, foreign peoples from other continents are flooding into Europe.

According to a survey from 2023, one in five Swedes felt that their area has become less safe. At the same time, a narrow majority (51 per cent) of Swedes stated that they have personally considered moving to another place because of rising insecurity.[3]

Millions of Swedes no longer feel comfortable in their own neighbourhood. That half of the Swedish population has seriously considered moving from their current home due to fear of crime and violence would have been totally unthinkable 50 years earlier. At that time, Sweden was still a safe and relatively ethnically homogeneous country.

Now, Sweden has become a Multicultural country with mass immigration and massive rates of violent crime among imported clan cultures. The big question is: Where should citizens move to avoid these problems?

Continue reading

A Letter to the Cousins

Our English correspondent Seneca III addresses his latest remarks to his American cousins.

A Letter to the Cousins

by Seneca III

On this side of the pond and then on over the ditch to Europe, there is increasing chaos. The political classes, the academics and the politicians we have elected are scrambling around and promoting this DEI excrement which has turned so much of our national socio-economic landscapes into moral wildernesses by selling out to these ‘new citizens’, the so called ‘immigrants’ and ‘refugees’ who are in fact illegally-entered black and brown criminals (mostly Muslim) from every failed country on earth. They are slowly and violently taking over the streets, public spaces and public transport across the continent.

Stabbings, street robberies, rape gangs and shootings are now an unwelcome integral part of our way of life, and parts of several major cities such as Londonistan, which is now minority white, are infested with dangerous no-go areas unsafe even in daylight. At night they become war zones where different factions, races and gangs fight it out for control. Europe, with a couple of notable exceptions, is much the same.

In Aberdeen, Shell’s headquarters were targeted today with orange paint as Just Stop Oil activists claimed responsibility. They seem not to understand that the Universe, even if only to the extent of the thirteen-billion-year time/distance limited horizons we can presently observe, is huge beyond our comprehension. It is deep, complicated, profoundly mysterious and interconnected in ways we do not yet understand… if we ever will. That Extinction Rebellion and its various analogues should presume to tell us how it works on our cosmological microscale and that we are responsible for perfectly natural events smacks of the destructive knee-jerk response of simple-minded children.

We still do not know if solar activity and climate are constructive partners or destructive antagonists, for our collective life span is too short compared with that of Mother Sun. Homo sapiens sapiens still has a long way to go to complete its evolution into Homo solaris and even further to Homo stellaris, but one wonders how those far-distant descendants of ours will look back and view the twitterings of these gullible drones so taken in by the great global warming/carbon tax scam.

With much time on my hands these days, this redneck from over the pond has used it to keep a beady eye on you guys and I have a subliminal feeling that a major geopolitical sea change is underway over there. It’s hard to pin down amidst the furore surrounding Trump, the November presidential election and what will happen after, but there are some clues to be found in these snippets I have picked up during my interweb meanderings:

Continue reading

Nancy Faeser Wants to Smash the Right-Wing Extremists

Nancy Faeser is the dystopian interior minister of Modern Multicultural Germany. In the following video Ms. Faeser speaks openly about her plans to crush dissent by “right-wing extremists”. When she uses this term, she is primarily referring to the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany), a completely legal political party whose members work peacefully within the existing political structure to oppose the excesses and corruption of the political establishment — what is described in the USA as the “Deep State”.

The AfD wants to stop mass immigration and deport convicted foreign criminals. These “racist” goals are among the reasons party members are vilified as “right-wing extremists”. The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz, BfV), Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, is reportedly planning to ban the party

And all to protect German “democracy”.

Many thanks to the anonymous translator, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Our Dystopian Moment

The two videos below are unrelated; I just happened to encounter them both today. They seem somehow emblematic of the apocalyptic times that we Americans are forced to live through.

The first clip shows remarks made by Peter Navarro at CPAC. Mr. Navarro is an economist who served as a presidential advisor during the Trump administration. After the “election” of 2020 he, like so many other Trump associates, became a target of the January 6 Inquisition when the Democrats were in control of the House. He refused to comply with a congressional subpoena to provide documents and testimony, and was charged with two counts of contempt of Congress. After being convicted on both counts, he was sentenced to four months in prison. He is appealing the verdict, but the judge ruled that he must serve his sentence in the meantime.

I don’t have any opinion on Peter Navarro, nor any idea on the merits of the legal cases against him. However, I know that the treatment of him is shameless political persecution. The mickey-mouse stuff he was accused of doing would have merited no notice if he had been a Democrat, or served under an elected pol with a “D” after his name. He is being persecuted because he had the temerity to hitch his star to the evil Orange Man.

He made the following remarks just prior to beginning his prison sentence:

The second video is an excerpt from Tucker Carlson’s interview with the inventor and entrepreneur Steve Kirsch. Mr. Kirsch has great expertise in statistical methods, and since early 2021 he has been investigating the statistics on the adverse effects of the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus. He has done great service to his country by digging up and exposing to public view the ghastly figures on the adverse effects, especially deaths, caused by the vax. The CDC and the other panjandrums of the political-corporate power structure are doing their utmost to marginalize and shun him so that the general public will never become aware of the harm the government has done by coercing them to get jabbed.

I watched the full interview, which is almost an hour long, but it has since been taken down, presumably because TCN is zealously protecting its copyright. The video below shows only the first eleven minutes, but it will at least give you a taste of what Steve Kirsch had to say:

Hat tips: Vlad Tepes and Steen.

“Disinformation” is Whatever Goes Against the Narrative

Rob Roos is a Dutch politician who formerly represented FvD (Forum for Democracy) and then the party JA21 (Right Answer 21) in the European Parliament. He is now an independent. In the following video Mr. Roos speaks in the EP in Strasbourg about the EU’s attempt to censor Elon Musk’s platform X (formerly Twitter).

Many thanks to the anonymous translator, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Corrupt Governments Partnered With Corrupt Corporations — What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

The following video from the AUF1 TV channel in Germany discusses the recently concluded conference hosted by the World Economic Forum in Davos. The topic in focus is “public-private partnerships”, where gigantic global corporations get their financial tentacles into the affairs of formerly sovereign states.

Many thanks to Oz-Rita for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

No Parole for Akif Pirinçci

Akif Pirinçci is a Turkish-German fiction writer who in recent years has taken up social and political commentary. Based on Turkish orthography, Mr. Pirinçci’s surname is pronounced “Pirinsky”, which indicates that his family is of Slavic origin. His ancestors may have been Bulgarians who were absorbed into the Ottoman Empire during its conquests, and converted to Islam (possibly forcibly).

Over the past ten years Mr. Pirinçci’s activities have been featured here on multiple occasions, including:

It looks like Akif Pirinçci’s luck may have run out at last: he has been sentenced to nine months in prison for saying doubleplus ungood things (not sure what the correct formulation would be in Neusprech) about the New Germans.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Apollo News:

Without Parole

Akif Pirinçci sentenced to prison for “incitement against migrants”

The writer Akif Pirinçci was sentenced to prison for using derogatory names against immigrants. He has now been sentenced to nine months in prison for incitement to hatred.

Akif Pirinçci was sentenced to nine months in prison on Monday. The writer, who is known, among other things, for his cat crime novels, must now go to prison for sedition because he agitated against migrants, said the judge in justifying the verdict. Pirinçci sees his statements as covered by freedom of expression.

The background is a contribution on his private blog “The Little Akif” from 2022. In it, Pirinçci was upset about, among other things, “Muslims or Afros” who would “continue to multiply like microbes”. He also described them as “parasites” in “state welfare institutions”.

The judge further explained that this text incites hatred of migrants. In addition, it represents an attack on human dignity. With nine months in prison, the judge’s verdict even exceeded the sentence demanded by the public prosecutor’s office. They had asked for seven months.

Pirinçci’s lawyer now wants to file an appeal. Not every criticism of refugees or borderline statement is sedition; not everything that doesn’t please everyone automatically constitutes a criminal offense, he argued in court. He believes he has a greater chance of a more lenient verdict at the Federal Court of Justice.

It is not the first time that Pirinçci has been convicted of sedition. The writer was sentenced to a fine back in 2017, because in an public address he spoke, among other things, of “Muslim garbage dumps”.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

Strengthening Democracy Means Crushing the Right Wing

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

“Dismantle networks, drain financial sources”

Interior Minister Faeser is pushing for a democracy promotion law

Federal Interior Minister Faeser is determined to push a democracy promotion law through the Bundestag. Right now it is “high time” to strengthen the work of “civil society initiatives”. Critics suspect something different.

Berlin

Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser (SPD) has called for the rapid introduction of a democracy promotion law. It is currently more important than ever to strengthen associations and people “who make our democracy strong and vibrant,” said Faeser to the Rheinische Post. [I guess she means ANTIFA and DİTİB — Turkish-Islamic Union for Religious Affairs] According to the minister, it is “high time” to financially support the “countless civil society initiatives”.

According to the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, the law is intended to provide more funding for associations that say they are committed to democracy and against extremist activities. [I take it that she means by “extremists” those farmers and normal people who fear for the safety of their families because of insane government policies and the cultural enrichment spree by invading marauders from hostile “cultures”.] The draft law was presented by Interior Minister Faeser and Family Minister Lisa Paus (Greens) in 2022; the Bundestag has not yet voted on it.

Faeser praises anti-right demonstrations

Criticism of the planned law came primarily from the Union [CDU/CSU] and AfD. They fear that under the guise of combating extremism, the federal government will only support projects that are close to their own worldview. The Union and the AfD also criticize the fact that there is no extremism clause in the draft law that checks projects for their constitutionality. [Well, that would disqualify the entire German government and all the old political parties] They fear that left-wing lobby groups will be financed in the name of promoting democracy. [10 points for grasping immediately what this self-serving “law” is all about.]

Meanwhile, Faeser praised the anti-right demonstrations last weekend. The fact that “so many people take a stand and fight” even in small towns and in East Germany is “an encouragement and a mandate at the same time.” Faeser believes that German citizens expect the state to “protect all those who are subjected to racism, exclusion and hatred.” To achieve this, the Interior Minister wants to “dismantle right-wing extremist networks, drain their financial sources, take away their weapons and harshly prosecute agitators and violent criminals.” [And here we can clearly see where the hare lies buried in pepper. This “law” is only aimed against people who fight for their freedom, livelihood and safety of their loved ones from ideological retarded haters of everything that is German.]

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

The Office for the Protection Against Hans-Georg Maaßen


Dr. Hans-Georg Maaßen is the former head of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution in Germany — the state intelligence service. He is now the president of the Values Union (WerteUnion), a non-profit organization whose motto is “Freiheit statt Sozialismus” (“Freedom instead of Socialism”).

I’ve posted several times in the past about Dr. Maaßen (most recently here, earlier posts: #1, #2, #3, #4). He says commonsensical things about immigration and Islamization, which has made him the target of official scrutiny by his former agency. It looks like he has become an Enemy of the State.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Tichys Einblick. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

The Office for the Protection of the Constitution is monitoring Hans-Georg Maaßen

The state is mobilizing against the opposition. Germany’s domestic secret service is rolling out heavy guns against the head of the Union of Values, Hans-Georg Maaßen. The justification for the office is downright silly. Maaßen himself speaks of an “attack on the free, democratic basic order”.

The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution lists its former president Hans-Georg Maaßen as a so-called “observation case”. This is stated in an official decision from the authority, which has now been officially sent to Maaßen’s lawyers and which Maaßen himself published [PDF].

This confirms information from TE from last week. The current head of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, Thomas Haldenwang (CDU), had already announced in a background conversation with journalists that his office had “parts of the Union of Values and the fraternities” spied on.

Haldenwang said at the meeting: First you look at Twitter, then you create a file — and then you carry on.

Formally, the domestic secret service has now at least created the conditions for using intelligence resources against its former boss. With the approval of the so-called “G10 Commission” of the Bundestag, Maaßen’s correspondence could then even be monitored and his telephone tapped.

The background is the enormously expanded options that the Office for the Protection of the Constitution has been given against so-called “delegitimizers of the state”. Practically anyone who criticizes state institutions or people in state office may now be considered (and prosecuted) as such.

The first three reasons given by the office itself for classifying Maaßen as an observation case show how arbitrarily the Office for the Protection of the Constitution acts in this regard:

Continue reading