Category Archives: MSM Prevarications

Powers and Principalities

Posted on by
6

Our Israeli correspondent MC sends this essay in observance of the first anniversary of the massacre by Hamas.

Powers and Principalities

by MC

The Left has a huge problem with its hubris and arrogance, and nowhere does this come to the fore more than in its inbuilt anti-Semitism and self-excusing ‘anti-Zionism’.

The two are one and the same thing, but in theory, whilst anti-Zionism is meant to be ‘anti-Israel’, the practical outworkings of anti-Zionism soon become anti-Semitic because organisations like Hamas do not discriminate between Israeli Jews and Jews of the diaspora.

Supporting ‘Palestinians’ is more a statement of Luciferianism than anything else. If one declares oneself an atheist, then one has no protection against the powers and principalities of the earth and of darkness. To me, someone who rejects religion is naïve, and most atheists seem to adopt alternative political religion(s) as a substitute for any religion they may have rejected. Mostly they adopt one of the various forms of socialism to assuage their overwhelming need to be seen as a do-gooder.

AOC has come out and condemned the latest Israeli attack on Hezbollah. She seems to be able to ignore the thousands of missiles aimed at Israeli civilians, and only criticises a targeted attack that took out many terrorists without massive collateral damage. Of course, AOC is part of the massive Hamas and Hezbollah propaganda attack on the USA that is targeting particularly Democrats in an ugly hate-fest of self righteousness and historical hubris.

On October 7th, 2023 my place of residence was attacked out of the blue by savages akin to those of the Dakota Sioux uprising of 1862.

During the war, Dakota men attacked and killed over 500 white settlers, causing thousands to flee the area and took hundreds of “mixed-blood” and white hostages, almost all women and children. By the end of the war, 358 settlers had been killed, in addition to 77 soldiers and 36 volunteer militia and armed civilians. The total number of Dakota casualties is unknown, but 150 Dakota men died in battle. On September 26, 1862, 269 “mixed-blood” and white hostages were released to Sibley’s troops at Camp Release. Interned at Fort Snelling, approximately 2,000 Dakota surrendered or were taken into custody, including at least 1,658 non-combatants, as well as those who had opposed the war and helped to free the hostages.

In less than six weeks, a military commission, composed of officers from the Minnesota volunteer Infantry, sentenced 303 Dakota men to death. President Abraham Lincoln reviewed the convictions and approved death sentences for 39 out of the 303.

At least the Santee Sioux had some justification: they were starving, having been displaced and forced into ‘farming’, subsequently suffering a devastating crop failure in 1861. Hamas is in receipt of millions of dollars in ‘aid’ every year but are they thankful? No, and as is the Islamic way, they believe it is their god-given right to receive… It is the jizya the west pays as dhimmis, i.e. Untermenschen.

I wrote the above about a month ago about the time of the ‘Grim Beeper’ incident. Once more there is war just down the road as the IDF again goes into Gaza city. My youngest son was recalled last week and is now somewhere in darkest Lebanon. October 7 changed us all. Due to the incompetence and distraction of the leftist IDF generals, we were attacked and occupied. Said generals were distracted, supporting a leftist coup d’état against the Prime Minister at the time.

Continue reading →

The Eve of Deconstruction

Posted on by
4

The following essay was originally posted at Vlad’s place in a slightly different form.

A short and partial list of common (Marxist) terms and a translation to reality

by Eeyore for Vlad

This is a post I have wanted to make for a long time. A Marxist-t- English dictionary, even if it’s only half a page. The point of it is to understand how to do much more than just expose the specific terms we chose as exemplars. Understanding the principles and methods of Marxist dialectical terminology is critical if you want to have any chance of seeing outside the Matrix.

Communism is not much more — if anything at all — than a system for attacking and destroying Western Civilization at every level at which Western Civilization operates and exists. More than we are even aware of. Every aspect of our nature, from our forms of reasoning and cultures as well as all institutions and professions which support our systems. From medicine to engineers, pilots to teachers etc.

Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals is an excellent manual on how to use orthodox Marxist methods adapted to the early 20th century. And a lot of those methods can be said to be a subset of Critical Theory.

At one level, Critical Theory is really simple. It is just criticizing everything about the West. Dishonestly, partially honestly, meaning spinning a real thing into something totally other than it really was to make the West, and especially the US look bad, or even honest criticism in an emergency, so to speak. Meaning when a narrative attack isn’t available. But in nearly all cases, Critical Theory is about a fictionalized version of the target and then a Critical Theory attack on that fiction.

It is because of this that we noticed that the media would sustain a rabid feeding frenzy over any non-white person killed by police either due to no fault of the police, like with George Floyd, or where the person who was shot richly deserved it as they were in the process of committing a violent crime. Even more importantly, that when a person who could be labelled as a black person was killed by police for reasons that were likely genuinely racist, there was little to no media coverage, and certainly no major protests or riots.

And this is 100% sensible when one understands that the idea is not to make the system better, but to destroy it altogether.

When people protest a real problem, there is a hoped-for solution that makes things even better than they were before. But when the problem is synthetic, the solution the rioters want, defund the police etc., is the only option on the table.

Therefore, when we look at the way we are forced to look at race relations now in the West, and particularity the USA, we can see and understand it as a product of:

Critical Race Theory. A Critical Theory attack on the West by attacking people of European ethnicity, or “white people” as guilty of any number of things for which they have no connection and in many ways no-one ever was guilty as the history is usually partly or fully fictionalized. Certainly the context will be adjusted for the best effect of the Critical Theory attack.

The communists now in control of the schools are becoming more bold now and use the term, Critical Race Theory more openly. But that is what it is. A branch of Hegelian dialectics as interpreted by Marx and refined by the Frankfurt School tactician, Alinsky. This process of abstracting and expanding Marxist methods of attack on the West continues to this day. And the people fighting for the West for the most part do not understand the nature of the attack, and spend all their resources arguing the reality behind the Critical Theory attack, if they even get that far. In other words, arguing the surface specifics of a given narrative’s claims, while the Critical Theory attack does its damage.

As we often say, with the left, the point is never the point. The Revolution is always the point.

Continue reading →

The Poisons in Your Sky

Posted on by
6

I don’t know much about chemtrails, so I can’t offer an expert opinion on the topic. However, the following documentary from the Netherlands seems quite well-sourced, and offers plenty of food for thought.

Many thanks to Henk for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading →

Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. — Chapter 19

Posted on by
4

Below is the 19th and final chapter in the serialization of Paul Weston’s book Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. Previously: Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18.

Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime.

by Paul Weston

Chapter 19: Afterword

The sole purpose of this small book was to show, in as few words as possible, that there was no lethal Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, and that the vaccines were completely unnecessary, horrifically dangerous and, astonishingly / criminally ineffective in every possible way a vaccine is supposed to be effective.

There is so much more to say about this crime of the century, but to do so would require much more than one book. The roles played by Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci, for example, could fill an entire bookshelf.

The details laid out in this book are not just my opinion; they are taken from data sites owned by governments and health regulation agencies. They are true. And if they are true, then everything we were told (and continue to be told) about Covid-19 is a lie.

Tragically — and criminally — the people lying to us are those whose specific job it is to look after our best interests. The politicians, the doctors, the health regulatory agencies, the mainstream media, the Fact Check agencies, the World Health Organisation, the EU, the UN, and the social media giants such as Facebook and YouTube.

All of these people and organisations amassed money and power during the Covid-19 purported pandemic. This money and power resulted purely from lying to and betraying the citizens of nations worldwide.

In America, the Food & Drug Agency (FDA) only released Pfizer’s data on vaccine harms because it was forced to do so by a court order. Also in America, The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) continues to recommend that pregnant women and babies receive mRNA booster shots, whilst simultaneously fighting court cases to prevent the release of data they hold which catalogues massive numbers of vaccine harms.

The same thing is happening in every single Western country, where every single health regulation agency is doing the exact same thing. The levels of corruption are vast. As are the wicked and murderous crimes they are engaged in. The CDC’s motto, incidentally, is: Saving Lives. Protecting People.

Continue reading →

Return to Poltava

Posted on by
8

In the 17th and early 18th centuries Sweden was a great power in Europe, with a formidable army. It’s hard to credit now, but back then the Swedish king was an aggressive military campaigner and had hegemonic ambitions. He fought the Great Northern War against Russia and its allies at the beginning of the 18th century, but his early successes ended with a devastating defeat at the Battle of Poltava, in what is now Ukraine, in the summer of 1709. Sweden’s failure in the Great Northern War broke its control of the Baltic region, and effectively ended the Swedish Empire.

Last Tuesday Sweden suffered a new defeat at Poltava when some of its military advisors were reportedly killed by a Russian missile strike on a military training center. Accounts of what happened at Poltava are hedged about with propaganda from both sides, as is true of everything in the Russo-Ukrainian War, so that determining an accurate casualty count is very difficult. The official Ukrainian report of the number of dead has now risen to 58, with well over 250 wounded, so there’s no doubt it was a devastating setback for Ukraine. Estimates from other sources give much higher totals, and say a large number of foreign “mercenaries” (which I gloss as incognito NATO troops) were among the dead. The casualties include an undetermined number of Swedish military personnel, who were at the site to train the Ukrainians in the use of two AWACS aircraft that had been delivered by Sweden.

That’s the bare bones of what occurred in Poltava last Tuesday. As I mentioned, the incident is clouded by massive amounts of propaganda and disinformation put out by both sides, making it hard to determine what actually happened.

If you want to begin separating the wheat from the chaff, Simplicius the Thinker is the one to read. He’s very much pro-Russia, but he’s a fair reporter. He tells you when something is rumor, and when it’s well-sourced. Rather than relying on official Russian sources alone, he sifts information from various milblogs and social media. And despite his support for Russia, he doesn’t hesitate to criticize it when he thinks such criticism is warranted.

He’s one of the few writers covering the war in Ukraine whose predictions have a very good track record. Predictions made by partisans on both sides have generally been wildly off, but Simplicius’ matter-of-fact outlines of what he expects to happen usually turn out to be quite accurate. That’s one of the main reasons I read his stuff regularly.

I mentioned the official Ukrainian casualty figures above — 50+ dead, 250+ wounded — but other Ukrainian sources, milblogs and so on, give much higher numbers, with a lot of NATO “advisors” among the casualties.

Now we come to some of the dezinformatsiya surrounding the missile strike in Poltava.

Two posts on X give a lurid account of the massive numbers of Ukrainian and NATO troops killed and wounded. I’m not going to quote from them, because I don’t want to extend the reach of what I consider disinformation.

I searched the Internet using specific phrases from the posts, and could find only the same X account, and other posts quoting from it. Nothing else.

Both posts credit “24 News” as their source. There are two news sites called “24 news”, one in India, in the Malayalam language, and the other in Pakistan, in English. I couldn’t find any stories remotely like these on either of those sites.

So I think we’re being Twitter-played, yet again.

The Poltava strike was probably much worse than is being reported in the media. However, it looks like someone, maybe the CIA, is running a QAnon-type operation on us, laying out flypaper for right-wingers by making the situation look sensationally worse than it is, so that when the information is eventually revealed as being bogus, it will discredit any reports that paint a more horrific picture than what the MSM is telling us. Then anything other than the official line can be dismissed as right-wing “conspiracy theories”.

Once again, in order to separate what seems reasonably credible from the obvious fakes, I recommend a careful reading of Simplicius’ material. I’ve collected some extensive excerpts below from two of his recent posts. When his block quotes are not explicitly sourced, I assume they come from X, but I’m not certain of that. See the original posts for the image inserts and videos.

The first is from last Thursday:

Continue reading →

Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. — Chapter 13

Posted on by
3

Below is the thirteenth chapter in the serialization of Paul Weston’s book Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. Previously: Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12.

Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime.

by Paul Weston

Chapter 13: Does it work?

No, the Covid-19 vaccines are not effective at all. They don’t stop infection or transmission, contrary to what we were told at the time. When it became apparent they didn’t do what a vaccine is supposed to do (stop infection and transmission) we were then told the vaccine was effective in minimising the infection and keeping us out of hospital.

This was a lie. No one actually knew if this was the case. Nothing in the vaccine trial suggested this might be true and, more to the point, the claimed minimisation of infection was never actually tested or evaluated in any of the trials. As I say, this was simply a lie.

Do you remember the fanfare in late 2020 when we were told vaccine redemption was close to hand? Do you remember the adulation and the frenzied gratitude toward those lovely, thoughtful, deeply caring people in the Big Pharma Industry who arrived like the heroic cavalry at the 11th hour to save us all from certain death?

The vaccine is 95% effective we were told. Hoorah for the vaccine! And out most of us duly trudged to wait in line for our jab of salvation. What did they mean by 95% effective, though? Effective against what, exactly? If the vaccines didn’t stop infection, transmission, severity of illness or death, where on earth did the “effective” in 95% effective come from?

We were led to believe it simply meant that out of every one hundred vaccinated people, ninety-five could happily get Covid-19 and shake it off in a jiffy, whilst five unfortunate people would not. This is not the case at all, though, and has to do with Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) and Relative Risk Reduction (RRR).

Approximately forty-two thousand people were involved in the Pfizer vaccine trial. Twenty-one thousand were given the vaccine, and twenty-one thousand a placebo. The latter is known as the Control Group. A few weeks later both groups were tested for signs of Covid-19 symptoms such as a cough, cold, fever etc, which were “confirmed” by a positive PCR test.

Continue reading →

The Hinge of History

Posted on by
17

With yesterday’s assassination attempt on former President Trump, we’ve arrived at a hinge of history. It’s a chaotic moment, in a mathematical sense — impossible to reliably predict what will come next. The differential equations describing the current flow of events have no exact solutions, and the successive approximations have not yet converged on a new basin attractor.

I can’t possibly keep up with the rapid flow of new information, so I won’t be live-blogging any of this.

For the best coverage, I recommend (as usual) Vlad Tepes. Scroll down to the comments for new updates, which he has been adding fairly frequently.

Simplicius has posted some very good site diagrams from Butler, including maps and aerial photos with lots of useful annotations, better than anything else I’ve seen. He also closes his post with these remarks:

It’s clear things are on the brink for the globalist deepstate as they see no further way to tread water without simply eliminating all ascendant resistance leaders; their backs really are against the wall. We are entering a time of great troubles but also great hope, because given their desperation levels it’s clear the final battle is approaching and a grand turning point or realignment is almost upon us.

The big question is whether the Secret Service was guilty of gross incompetence, or something much worse. I don’t have any opinion yet on the matter, but these data points should be noted:

1.   A building whose rooftop provided a clear sniper shot at the stage was left outside the security perimeter, and had no Secret Service agents on top to guard it.
2.   The former president’s security detail had repeatedly requested additional security from the Department of Homeland Security, but was denied it.
3.   The Secret Service sniper team on the rooftop opposite the gunman had him in their sights, but did not squeeze off any shots before he winged the candidate and killed a bystander.
4.   More than one eyewitness reported that they had seen the man on the roof and attempted to alert law enforcement and/or the Secret Service, but to no avail.
 

Make what you will of those facts.

According to The New York Post, the shooter has now been identified as Matthew Crooks. However, that may not be the final word, because there are uncorroborated reports that it was different guy named Maxwell Yearick. I assume that there are massive amounts of disinformation being injected into the media and the web by players that have a vested interest in pushing the narrative in one direction or another.

The MSM is, of course, useless. Legacy media outlets went out of their way to avoid using the word “assassination”, and even delayed reporting “gunshots” for as long as they could.

And then there the many example of prominent politicians and media people calling for Trump to be liquidated, with varying degrees of explicitness. Keep an eye on Vlad’s place for those, but they are all over the place on other sites.

I expect Conservative Tree House to have extensive coverage today, and WRSA is a great place to keep up with the memes.

Feel free to leave further links in the comments. If you paste a quote that is at all controversial, please include a link showing where you got it.

Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. — Chapter 6

Posted on by
5

Below is the sixth chapter in the serialization of Paul Weston’s book Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. Previously: Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime.

by Paul Weston

Chapter 6: Manipulating the Death Rate Data

If you have studiously ploughed through all the facts and figures so far, you must be wondering how on earth Western governments got away with the colossal fraud entailed in persuading us that Covid-19 deaths were enormously high throughout 2020. Ditto, that we were all equally threatened with death if we disobeyed the various ludicrous and tyrannical edicts crashing down upon us from the political, media, scientific and medical establishments.

What they did was actually very simple. Beautifully simple, in fact. They just applied the label of “Covid-19 death” to perfectly natural and normal deaths of the old and the ill, along with the deaths by terminally unfortunate accident of the young and the healthy.

Before PCR Testing became the norm, doctors were advised — without the actual necessity of looking at the recently departed — to label the death as a Covid-19 death if the deceased had shown any symptoms of Covid-19 such as breathlessness, fever, cough, cold etc. Needless to say, most old and ill people who die exhibit many of those symptoms.

After the PCR Testing regime became the norm, all deaths were labelled as Covid-19 if the deceased had tested PCR Positive. This included those who were dying from cancer, heart disease, stage-4 kidney disease etc. Mr X actually died of cancer, but Covid-19 was the label attributed to his death, simply because he had tested PCR positive two months earlier.

Even worse, a perfectly healthy twenty-one-year-old who died in a motorcycle accident was labelled a Covid-19 death if he had tested PCR positive three months previously. The government took some stick over this obviously fraudulent manipulation of mortality data, and decided to become less fraudulently insane by stating the PCR Positive Test must have taken place within twenty-eight days of the death.

This lessened the distortion to a degree, but nonetheless a fit and healthy twenty-five-year-old who died in a para-gliding accident was still labelled a Covid-19 death if he had tested positive at any point over the twenty-eight days between PCR test and para-glider plummet. All of this was criminally fraudulent, obviously, but it laid the groundwork for even more criminal insanity with regard to the future vaccines.

I don’t want to get into the whole vaccine issue in this article, but bear the following in mind: Fit and healthy thirty-year-old Mr Y was injected with the mRNA vaccine on Jan 1st, 2022. A few days later he felt a bit iffy and toddled along for a PCR test on January 5th which returned a positive result. On January 10th, 2022, poor old Mr Y suffered a heart attack whilst cycling and was pronounced dead at the scene.

The cause of death was listed as Covid-19. His family protested and said he had been feeling perfectly OK up to the date of the mRNA vaccine injection. Could the vaccine be responsible for his death, they asked the doctor. Of course not, she scoffed. Mr Y was technically unvaccinated, you see.

Continue reading →

Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. — Chapter 4

Posted on by
9

Below is the fourth chapter in the serialization of Paul Weston’s book Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. Previously: Chapters 1, 2, 3.

Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime.

by Paul Weston

Chapter 4: The Great Care Home Cull

If we can agree that a huge death toll was pretty much the inevitable consequence of government action in American and British Care Homes, it forces us into asking a number of questions. The first of which must be: was it deliberately and cold-bloodedly planned, or was it simply the result of government incompetence?

At the very outset of the Covid-19 emergency, Britain’s dead-eyed Chief Medical Officer, Chris Whitty, stated the Covid-19 virus was relatively innocuous for the young, the fit and the healthy, and only presented a risk of death to the very old and the very ill.

Matt Hancock, the British Health Secretary at the time, stated he would throw a “ring of steel” around Britain’s Care Homes. In a manner of speaking, he did just that, but only insofar as making it impossible for relatives of care home residents to breach the ring of steel in order to visit their aged loved ones.

Imagine the surreal levels of incompetence necessary to inadvertently slaughter tens-of-thousands of old and ill elderly residents of care homes, having implicitly stated only the old and ill were vulnerable, and that wherever they were, a defensive “ring of steel” would be erected around them.

It is very hard to believe it was simply a matter of incompetence. There are a number of issues which reinforce this belief. If you cast your mind back to April and May 2020, what was being shown 24/7 on the TV news and in the newspapers? What were we being told 24/7 by our politicians?

Answer: We were in the grip of a deadly pandemic. Thousands were dying. Hospitals were swamped with Covid-19 patients. Exhausted doctors and nurses were working around the clock “on the front lines” in the war against Covid. We were all vulnerable. We must stay at home. This message was hammered home for the entirety of 2020.

Were the hospitals swamped? Were thousands dying in our overwhelmed hospitals? The following graph suggests they were not:

As you can clearly see, acute and general bed occupancy plummeted in our hospitals during April and May 2020, even as the daily Covid-19 deaths reached hundreds and then thousands. So no, our hospitals were not overwhelmed. If our doctors and nurses were exhausted, it was only because so many of them are so fat and so unfit they were unable to keep up with the TikTok choreographer’s dance routine demands. If you think I am joking, just Google “Dancing Nurses” and weep.

Anyone who visited a hospital in post March 2020 knows they were virtually empty. Of course they were. All routine operations were cancelled. The only people “dying from Covid-19” in April and May 2020 were dying in the care homes, not the hospitals. And they were dying from loneliness, starvation and dehydration, not Covid-19.

Continue reading →

Injured vs. Wounded

Posted on by
3

When someone gets stabbed, or shot, or blown up by a suicide bomber, or deliberately run over with a vehicle, would you describe him as “injured”? Or is he “wounded”?

For many years, guidelines provided by the Gates of Vienna style book have advised that anyone who is hurt but not killed by deliberate human actions should be described as “wounded”. I follow that rule when editing essays and translations: I change “injured” to “wounded” where appropriate.

Even if a translation is exactly, literally correct, I’m going to change “injured” to “wounded”, because I think the use of the former word is part of the media propaganda war intended to hide the full horror of immigrant atrocities. That type of obfuscation is being attempted in all languages.

Injuries happen during car wrecks, train disasters, hurricanes, and other acts of God, but anything human-inflicted is a wound.

The difference is subtle, but the nuance is picked up subliminally by the reader, who becomes conditioned to think that that someone who is “injured” by a culture-enricher with a machete is basically the same as the victim of a natural disaster.

I’ve noticed this phenomenon for many years in English-language news reports. People who receive horrible wounds at the hands of jihad terrorists, muggers, and “teenagers” playing the knockout game are described as “injured”.

If you hear that often enough, you become desensitized to the difference between the two words.

I won’t be a party to the propaganda: those victims are WOUNDED.

Whose Face Will Be on the Trillion-Dollar Bill?

Posted on by

Some of the things that President Biden and the Democrat Party have been doing over the past few months are pretty bizarre, considering that this is an election year.

Hispanics and even blacks are shifting away from the Democrats. Young people — the parti-colored Zoomer TikTok generation — are increasingly drawn towards Donald Trump. The way things are going, there won’t be enough dump trucks available to haul in the “found” ballots required to put Joe Biden over the top on the night of November 5th. The Democrats are virtuosos at rigging elections, but even in the dystopian twilight of 21st-century America, elections can only be stolen at the margin. The race has to be at least somewhat close in order to pull off an effective steal.

The Democrat apparat seems utterly unconcerned with making sure the race is a tight one. One unpopular policy after another is being pushed — open borders, criminals released without bail, the promotion of sexual perversion, the war against the internal combustion engine, uniformed soldiers with pink hair mincing around in high heels…

And, to top it all off, there was the “Transgender Day of Visibility” on Easter Sunday. Don’t they even want to win the election?

Well, maybe they really don’t.

I’d been thinking along those lines for a while, and then last week I happened to read something similar at ZeroHedge, an essay saying that they’re going to let Trump win.

These are the key paragraphs:

Let Trump back in, and fight him on home turf — in the maze of the executive bureaucracy. Some of his backers have announced their intention to become politically competent in the event that he wins — but compared to the alternatives, that’s a very manageable risk.

More importantly: let Trump hold the bag for the all-but-guaranteed economic calamity of the next four years. The regime could skate for another decade if they succeed in pinning the collapse on a dangerous, erratic right-wing upstart. [emphasis added]

Everything I say here tonight is pure speculation. I’m not an expert on any of these matters, and especially not on financial issues. I’m just a reasonably well-informed layperson who reads a lot of information from diverse points of view.

It’s undeniable that the country is headed towards some form of fiscal calamity. As I mentioned last month, money-printing is being taken to new extremes:

I swore off making specific predictions after the previous great fiscal crisis in 2009, when my prognostications were so completely wrong. I never would have thought they could keep the racket going for another fifteen years, but here we are. The Powers That Be have managed to do a lot with derivatives and real estate bubbles.

But the debt graph can’t keep going up with a steadily increasing slope — it just can’t. Someday the pyramid scheme will come crashing down, and the chickens will come home to roost. Based on the current debt acceleration, it won’t be much longer. It might take a week; it might take a decade. But the chickens will be roosting relatively soon.

The thing is, the people who keep the Ponzi scheme afloat know exactly what’s coming. They know the money-printing tactic will eventually stop working. It’s a complex process, what with cryptocurrencies, CBDCs, derivatives, paper and digital “futures” of precious metals, and now the BRICS alternatives. Keeping those plates spinning must surely be a tricky business.

And the people in charge know that a collapse of the dollar will eventually come. In order enrich themselves fully, and assure themselves an unbroken hold on the levers of power, they will need to time the crisis carefully. At exactly the right moment they will topple the pillars supporting the dollar-based economy, after having thoroughly prepared the replacement system that will be built on the smoking ruins of the old one.

So which patsy will be nominally in charge when the house of cards comes tumbling down? Who will preside over the Great Collapse?

Whose face will be on the Zimbabwe-style trillion-dollar bill?

For a long time I thought Brandon was being set up as the fall guy. He was always obviously a disposable president, a non-re-electable senile geezer who could be pushed aside when he was no longer needed. The people who crafted his policies and wrote his speeches clearly didn’t try to make him more popular. I assumed that when the time was right, he would be gently eased out (and Kamala, too, although that part would be tricky), and a substitute such as Gavin Newsom or Big Mike installed to run in 2024, someone who was at least plausible enough that the election could be rigged on his behalf.

But it never happened. And the scripts that Brandon has been following have been so damaging to him that it’s obvious that his handlers don’t really want him to win re-election. It is intended that he go down in flames, taking the Democrat Party with him.

Continue reading →

The ‘High IQ’ of Murder

Posted on by

Our Israeli correspondent MC sends an update on Sderot, plus his thoughts on the larger issues.

The ‘High IQ’ of Murder

by MC

Nazism is a political meme which has been securely packaged up and filed under ‘Far Right: Conservative’, and is wheeled out whenever the left wants to shut down debate or dialogue or sling the ‘racist’ epithet against their opponents.

But whilst conservatives may want to preserve cultural integrity and Judeo-Christianity in particular, they have not generally indulged in mass murder and slavery as have the Left.

This ‘right-wing’ filing is wrong, but has caused mayhem for the last 70 years. It is a superlative opportunity for projection and, as conservatives nearly always fall for it, too, it has become a major suppressor of conservative cultural policy.

Nazism was a byproduct of the failure of Marxism. The (Marxist) proletariat did not rise up and take over the means of production as predicted, and the communist aficionados became impatient. Lenin decided that a top-down revolution was better than Marxian bottom-up ‘pie in the sky’.

Mussolini, on the other hand, as the leader of the Italian Communists, decided that communism could be achieved without a revolution,

At this point Marx/Leninism and Marx/Mussoliniism were moving in similar directions.

Marx/Mussoliniism was renamed ‘Fascism’ (after the fascia, the bundle of sticks wrapped around a Roman spear a symbol of Roman power). The only fundamental difference between the two was that fascism was not interested in state ownership so much as state control.

But there was nothing new here. Social paganism is thousands of years old, but by jiggling with names, these new ‘pagan’ philosophies became chic, and were adopted by elites in the anglosphere and elsewhere. They were particularly popular amongst academics and those who thought themselves as of slightly higher IQ than average, and thus ‘better’ people.

As the world fell under their ‘might is right’ pall, and their ‘ends justify the means’ politics, people began to die in large numbers. Once again, slavery became commonplace as great civil projects were undertaken, hailed as a ‘cure’ for the recession, dams and canals were built, highways and other infrastructure erected, and treasuries drained. In Germany it was decided that the treasury issues could only be tackled by expansion: Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland; WAR.

And with it, an opportunity for continental Europe to tackle that age-old ‘Jewish problem’.

But there was nothing new in this evolution of evil. Islam had preceded it by over a thousand years, following almost the same path to a might-is-right/ends-justify-the-means-based political religion. Back in the deep history of Islam, even more people were slaughtered and even more enslaved and even they had their own ‘Jewish problem’.

People hated Jews, and especially their economic dependence on Jews. Jews handled much of the finance and technical trades of Islam, and had to be kept alive, but in the virtual slavery of dhimmitude. Rank in Islam was denoted by headgear: the bigger the hat, the more important the person, and Jews were subject to both height and headgear restrictions. The kippah was the designated headgear for those captive Jews.

The Nazis’ ‘final solution’ also involved Jews being kept alive as captive (slave) workers in vital industries.

In modern times, these streams of communism, Fascism and Islam come together under the banner of Wokism.

Continue reading →

It’s the Religion, Stupid

Posted on by

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this German-language post from Twitter:

Thought experiment shows: Climate narrative has long since become an ideology

Let’s assume for a moment that science finds out that temperatures on earth are falling, that CO2 is not the main driver of the climate, or that climate change has a positive impact on crop yields and prosperity will impact worldwide. In other words, the climate panic would be canceled for one of the reasons listed.

What would sound like good news would have massive consequences for the course chosen. The agreements between states to reduce emissions would be invalid, and the restructuring of industry and energy supply that has taken place so far would be meaningless in the new context. Capital flows amounting to thousands of billions of dollars would suddenly be called into question. Party programs would have to be rewritten.

In the thought experiment we can now test how realistic it is to assume that these new scientific findings would actually become widespread. Would the truth be stronger than all party-political, industrial and ideological interests? No, of course not. This assumption would be naïve. No one in power would simply agree to change the climate narrative and put their own interests aside. There is far too much at stake for that.

If this is not the case today, what year was the “point of no return”? When did the climate course become set in stone? The course was set at the latest with the Paris climate agreement in 2015. Presumably already with the establishment of the IPCC in 1988, which had the task of proving man-made climate change.

When viewed from a meta-level, the matter is clear: the climate narrative is an ideology. Science is no longer open-ended. Since probably 1988, at least since 2015. Everything else is wishful thinking. The harsh treatment of critics, the censorship we experience, the massive propaganda in the media underline this result of the thought experiment.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading →

It’s the Vax, Stupid!

Posted on by

One of the conclusions emerging from the International Crisis Summit 4 in Bucharest is that the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus actually increased the incidence of mortality due to COVID-19.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Uncut News:

It’s proven! The Covid vaccine caused the emergence of the aggressive variant of the virus

The shocking statistics clearly show that Covid mortality only increased explosively in 2021, the year of mass vaccination of the population. In addition, under pressure from the messenger RNA vaccine, the SARS-Cov-2 virus developed an extremely aggressive form, which led to an increase in mortality. The results were presented at the International Crisis Summit 4in the Romanian Parliament Palace, attended by leading medical experts from around the world.

The highest risk of dying from Covid was in 2021, when the CFR (Case Fatality Rate) was 3.48%, compared to 1.4% in 2020 and less than 1% in 2022 and 2023, when people didn’t get the vaccine. 45-50 days after the first dose of the so-called vaccine, the escalation of cases and deaths began, while in Romania the first dose was administered in the middle of the de-escalation of Covid-19, which contradicts all epidemiological principles, said Dr. Oana Mihaela Secara in her speech at the International Crisis Summit 4, held on November 18 and 19, 2023 at the Palace of the Parliament in Romania.

She pointed out that, according to the epidemiological data collected, the risk of death from Covid-19 in 2021 is reflected by the IFR (infection fatality rate), which corresponds to the CFR: “The IFR is even 3.48%, since most patients report their symptoms and get tested in order to receive six months of freedom through the green certificate.”

In addition, the Delta variant, which developed in the fall of 2021 under the pressure of the so-called vaccine, was aggressive and frightened the population with the number of deaths, this time even “Covid”, according to the Romanian doctor. In the year of the vaccination campaign, Prof. Virgil Paunescu, Vice President of the Academy of Medical Sciences, warned that if the virus is put under pressure, whether through treatments or vaccines, it will seek a way out, with the risk of generating mutations that could be more aggressive. This has already happened.

Health policy has increased mortality

Apart from the official treatment protocols with drugs that do not have a positive impact on the recovery of Covid patients, the biggest problem in 2020 and 2021 was the misguided health policies dictated by the government, says Dr. Oana Mihaela Secara. Assigning Covid patients to single-specialty hospitals, without doctors of other specialities and without medical equipment, allocating fewer places for patients in health centers and ATIs, maintaining a small number of ATI specialists and overloading them have led to a huge increase in mortality.

Continue reading →