Category Archives: MSM Prevarications

The Demonic Convergence of Communism and Islam

Posted on by

In the following video Major Stephen Coughlin (U.S. Army, retired) is interviewed by Vlad Tepes about the convergence of Islamic ideology — coordinated by the Muslim Brotherhood — and the ideology of Communism, as traced through the writings of Hegel, Marx, Lenin, and Mao.

In order to understand what is being done to us — the deliberate deconstruction of Western Civilization by the Demonic Convergence — it is necessary to pull our minds away from the narratives that have been thrust upon us by our governments, the media, and academia.

The task we face is described in this brief summary by Maj. Coughlin:

STOP — seeing what you know.
START — knowing what you see.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for conducting the interview and uploading the video:

See the accompanying article at the RAIR Foundation website.

Kill the Kuffar!

Posted on by

Massive culture-enriching riots in France are continuing into the weekend. The largest group of conflagrations is in Paris and its immediate environs, but copycat riots are springing up all over the country.

The situation is reminiscent of the riots in Clichy-sous-Bois (another suburb of Paris) in 2005. Back then two culture-enrichers fled from the police and crawled into an electrical substation to hide, whereupon they were electrocuted. It wasn’t even the police who fried them — it was their own stupidity. But “youths” set Clichy-sous-Bois on fire anyway.

Eighteen years later their numbers are much greater, and they’re setting the whole country on fire.

The following brief clip shows a Muslim “youth” exhorting his fellow rioters to kill the police. The important thing to note is the Koranic justification for the killings. Muslims don’t try to hide the role their religion plays in deadly violence, but the Western media hide it from their audience — you won’t see evidence like this on major TV outlets.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse and HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading →

BR-R-R-R-R-R! (Again)

Posted on by

As a follow-up to last month’s post about a record cold snap at the South Pole, here’s another report about the expanding ice shelf in Antarctica.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Report24:

Attention climate crackpots: 661 gigatons more mass — Antarctic ice shelf continues to grow

Scientists have found that the ice shelf around Antarctica expanded significantly from 2009 to 2019. Since this does not correspond to the common narrative of climate fanatics, the mainstream will certainly largely ignore it.

For decades climate fanatics have drummed into our heads that the polar ice caps are melting and that sea levels will rise dramatically as a result. But somehow the climate propaganda doesn’t accord with reality, as our reports on the Arctic (e.g. here and here) also show. In the Antarctic, people seem to be a long way from being ice-free too.

Three climate scientists from the University of Leeds were now using satellite data to check the condition of the ice shelf in Antarctica. They examined the annual calving position and area of 34 ice sheets, which together make up around 80% of the southernmost continent’s coastline. Among other things, they found that the reduction in area in the Antarctic Peninsula and West Antarctica by 6,693 km² and 5,563 km², respectively, became offset by the increase in East Antarctica by 3,532 km² and 14,028 km² on the large Ross and Ronne-Filchner ice shelves. The largest decline occurred on the Larsen C Ice Shelf, where 5,917 km² was lost in a single calving event that made alarming headlines around the world. The biggest increase, , which was reported somewhat less extensively in the media, was the 5,889 km² advance on the Ronne ice shelf.

The ice shelves provide important support for the glaciers behind them, and these areas are subject to large natural fluctuations. The climate fanatics like to pick large incursions into the sea to support their theories, while studiously ignoring growth in other areas. A very selective approach, which in no way even remotely reflects reality. This is what it looks like:

A total of 18 ice shelves are said to have retreated and 16 larger platforms increased in area. In total, the shelves have gained 661 gigatons in mass over the decade. The scientists note that using a “stable” process, meaning no change in any variable, would result in an estimate of a significant loss over that period. They argue that their work demonstrates the importance of using “time-varying observations of calving flow to measure change.”

One of the reasons for the ice melt in the western part of Antarctica is likely to be various volcanoes. 91 of them were not discovered until a few years ago, bringing the total number of active volcanoes there to 138. The ice melt in this region has absolutely nothing to do with the ominous “climate change” itself. A fact that scientists also pointed out in a study. Another paper also shows that since reliable satellite measurements began, there have been “no significant changes” in the annual sea ice coverage in Antarctica.

Continue reading →

The Only Good Thing About the BBC is They’re Bad Liars

Posted on by

The photo above is an obvious fake. I’m an untrained amateur, but the image is clearly a digitally modified composite using several layers (at least two or three) that have been sloppily merged.

It accompanied an article about Ukraine that was published yesterday by the BBC. The article itself is irrelevant; it’s just the usually boilerplate propaganda one expects from the MSM. What interests me is the photo.

The background is a shot of a sunlit field at midday during springtime. The foreground is probably composed of two distinct layers: the soldier shooting the grenade launcher next to a pile of dirt, and the pile of branches close to the camera. At least some of the fire and smoke associated with the firing of the weapon has been created digitally.

The soldier and the branches in the foreground were evidently photographed under a floodlight at night or during twilight. The pile of dirt beyond the soldier was outside the main glare of the floodlight, and was thus lit only by the blast from the grenade launcher — that is, backlit in orange and red.

It’s that last point that makes the image such an obvious fake: the pile of dirt does not share the same light source as the field beyond it. The technician who was assigned the job of creating the digital fake was either inept, careless, or untrained in the digital manipulation of images, or some combination of all three. It was a slipshod production, and Reuters and the BBC just let it slide on through.

But there is a fourth possibility: the composite image may have been created with deliberate incompetence, as an insult to the reader, as if to say: “We hold you in such contempt that we insult your intelligence by presenting you with this obvious fake. Deal with it.”

It brings to mind the well-known quote from Theodore Dalrymple:

In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.

As I said, I’m an amateur when it comes to digital manipulation, but even I could do better than the Reuters snoid who made this image. It took me just a few minutes to adjust the light on the upper surfaces in the pile of dirt to make it more plausibly in agreement with the sunlit field beyond:

Continue reading →

The Birth Dearth

Posted on by

There’s been a lot of discussion lately about the worldwide wave of excess deaths, which mainstream opinion says cannot possibly be due to the deleterious effects of the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus.

The following article discusses a marked reduction in the birth rate during the same time period, except for being shifted nine months. This also has nothing whatsoever to do with the vax.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Norbert Häring’s blog:

Sharp fall in the birth rate in February triggers yet another wave of hectic non-reporting

The announcement of another very low number of births in February by the Federal Statistical Office has again led to a wave of non-reporting in the German media. Everywhere there was no speculation and no experts were asked why it could be that the birth rate in Germany has been unusually low for about nine months after the start of mass vaccinations.

The established media are thus falling into the same pronounced non-hysteria — indifference — that they already showed when they did not report on the high excess mortality in Germany and many other countries in 2022.

According to the Federal Statistical Office, only 51,199 babies were born alive in February 2023, 2,528 fewer than in the previous year. In January, there were 54,648 live births, 3,758 fewer than a year earlier. This continues a downward trend that has been almost uninterrupted since early 2022.

The statisticians announced these figures yesterday morning (Tuesday). In the evening, I entered the term “declining birth rates” into the DuckDuckGo and Google search engines. The result on the first results page (apart from regional reports, as well as historical and general explanatory articles):

DuckDuckGo

1.   An undated press release from the Federal Statistical Office from 2023 about births in 2022. The decline from the average from 2019 to 2021 was then 5.2%.
2.   A July 2022 article by the rebellious alternative online publication Deutsche Wirtschaftsnachrichten entitled “Dramatic Decline in Births in Germany and Worldwide.”
3.   A contribution from Tagesschau.de in which, with reference to a brief study by the Federal Institute for Population Research, it is explained to us that the decline in the birth rate is probably only a short-term phenomenon, caused by the fact that women have postponed their desire to have children until it was their turn to be vaccinated.
4.   An alarmist online press release from a group called “pediatricians” from December 2022.
5.   A contribution from the public broadcaster MDR from September 2022, in which, with the help of an expert from the Federal Institute for Population Research, we are told that the drop in births is to be expected, normal and only temporary and probably has to do with the fact that women have temporarily put off their desire to have children until it was their turn to be vaccinated.
 

Google:

Continue reading →

The Invasion and Ethnic Cleansing of a Small Archipelago

Posted on by

The latest essay by our English correspondent Seneca III provides a broad overview of the Götterdämmerung that is now well underway in the British Isles.

The Invasion and Ethnic Cleansing of a Small Archipelago

by Seneca III

“And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.”

— Revelation 6 verse 8 (In the Bible a pale horse is a prominent symbol of death and pestilence.)

Provenance and apologies

Whilst this article is written from a purely UK perspective or, to be precise, an Anglo-Irish one, its primary thrust is applicable across the whole of the Western Ecumene from the Antipodes to the Americas.

Also, it is said that all writing is plagiarism, and I am certain that much of what I write is such. For the best part of eighty years I have been a copious reader across a considerable range of news, literature, history, commentary and opinion and thus I offer my thanks and apologies to any authors who, reading this, recognise a paraphrasing of their own contribution(s) to this dialectic.

Prologue: A soupçon of geography and history

An archipelago is a group of islands closely scattered in a body of water. Great Britain and the Republic of Ireland are the two largest constituents of a windswept archipelago in the North Atlantic lying to the west of Continental Europe. This ancient archipelago is centred on the British mainland at Latitude and Longitude 54° 00′ N and 2° 00′. Overall, it is a roughly linear feature running north to south from the Nordic-influenced Shetland Islands, through the Orkney Islands, the Outer Hebrides, the Isle of Man and finally to the Isle of Wight off the southern coast of England.

In a west-to-east direction, it encompasses the predominantly Catholic Republic of Ireland (Éire) in the south and the far smaller, predominantly Protestant, six counties of Northern Ireland (British). The oft-disputed geological and geopolitical anomaly of the Channel Islands — Guernsey, Jersey, Sark, Herm and the private islet of Jethou (part of the Bailiwick of Guernsey) — lies 100 miles due south from the English mainland at Weymouth and 12 miles due west from the French mainland on the Cotentin Peninsula.

[As an aside, geophysics has determined that the lonely pinnacle of Rockall is part of the land mass that broke off from Europe and hence is also part of the archipelago.]

Once contiguous with mainland Europe, it became separated 450,000 years ago. Stretched by tectonics and pounded by great waters a mega flood finally destroyed the land bridge that had physically connected the islands of Britain with continental Europe for some 10 million years. This crossing, consisting of relatively soft chalk, was approximately 20 miles wide and ran from Dover to Calais.

After the land bridge disappeared the only way that invasive tribes could cross the Channel was by hazarding their lives in fragile, generally unseaworthy boats, something they only managed to accomplish in small numbers owing to the unpredictable weather conditions and dangerous currents, and because in those days our farcical Border Force and the RNLI water taxi services did not exist. Now they come by their hundreds and thousands, parasites and predators all from every failed, primitive socio-economic basket case on the planet.


Proposition I: Britain and Éire are the victims of a successful mass invasion. As a consequence, long-heritage ethnic Caucasians are heading towards becoming a minority in their own lands within a matter of decades and possibly, in the long term, extinction through a process of country-wide xenogamic breeding coupled with a host of genetically damaged children resultant from Muslim consanguineous serial reproduction, all of which will have dire consequences for the future of we native inhabitants. This, then, is the survival challenge of our time as Nazism and Fascism were the challenges of the 1930s and ’40s through until ’45

“…We have explained before that human beings cannot exist except through social organisation and cooperation for the purpose of obtaining their food and other necessities of life. Each one will stretch out their hand for whatever he needs and try to take it since injustice and aggressiveness are in the animal nature.”

— From ‘The Muqaddimah’ (The Classic Islamic History of the World) by Ibn Khaldûn, Chapter Three, Proposition 21, “On dynasties, royal authority, the caliphate, government ranks and all that goes with these things.”

The human predilection to gather in co-operative groupings in order to shape, control and utilise a particular environment for the benefit of all members of a homogeneous community is as old as our species. It is an animal thing, a pack thing, a tribal thing. In zoology, sociology and psychology the phrase ‘territorial imperative’ is used to describe the need to claim and defend a territory, its assets, its physical and historic achievements and the successful socio-political organisation that generated them.

It has been argued that in human terms the intensity of the need to exercise a territorial imperative is inversely proportional to the length of time such a domain has been populated by a particular group who have become morally and ideologically united and are genetically homogenous, not the mongrel products of retrogressive human xenogamy.

Essentially, throughout the Euro-Anglosphere there have evolved those socio-cultural characteristics and modes of conduct that determine and will forever define why and what we are, and so clearly separate us from the descendants of the tribes of Arabian Peninsula, those conquered by them and those of the predominantly feral, low-IQ, predatory and violently unstable African ethnicity.

Continue reading →

A Duty to Lie

Posted on by

The following video features a recent appearance by Col. Douglas Macgregor (retired) on Judge Napolitano’s podcast. In it the two men discuss issues related to the leak of classified Pentagon documents by Jack Teixeira, an Air National Guardsman.

I was interested to see that Col. Macgregor and the judge had come to the same general conclusions about the leak that I did: it was a setup. The documents were deliberately made accessible to Airman Teixeira in the expectation that he would leak them. The intelligence community, a.k.a. the Deep State, found it expedient to have the information become public, without its having to be officially released by the U.S. government. Col. Macgregor outlines the most likely reasons for the leakage, which align fairly well with my own conclusions.

A side effect of the release is that major military and government officials have now been revealed as deliberate liars about the war in Ukraine and related matters. It’s still too early to tell whether this will affect any careers. If the media establish a uniform firewall against any meaningful discussion of the government’s mendacity, it’s quite possible that everyone can skate by and continue with business as usual. Or, it may be that the Deep State decided to sacrifice a few pawns, and maybe a rook and a bishop, in its execution of a sophisticated strategy on the global political chessboard.

Hat tip: Conservative Tree House.

Fear Itself

Posted on by

** UPDATE **

To clear up any misperceptions about what I wrote below: I mean no criticism of Western Rifle Shooters Association. Far from it. The site is a news aggregator, one of the best around. It doesn’t peddle fear porn, but it links to some people who do. As do I. We both think it’s important to link to all kinds of information, both alarming and reassuring.

My major beef is with sites that predict the occurrence of dire events within a specific time frame, then turn out to be wrong, and never have to account for their failure. Some sites that predicted hyperinflation no later than 2010 are still predicting it. It’s always going to happen within the next six months. When it eventually does happen, it won’t prove that they were right. You can wake up every morning and predict a major asteroid will strike the Earth tomorrow. Eventually there will come a day when a major asteroid does strike the Earth. But that won’t mean you were right.

And no, it’s not like a weather forecast. Weather forecasting is well understood to be an inexact science, subject to stochastic indeterminacy. Both the forecaster and the audience know that. But the doom-mongers who make specific predictions about dire events that will occur within a specific time frame make those predictions from a position of assumed inerrancy. And then, when they turn out to be wrong, they just move on to the next one, never revisiting their error or attempting to explain it.

On the other hand, I have no quarrel with writers who simply state what they think is most likely to occur. “I think X will probably occur, and here’s my reasoning. But it’s also possible that Y will happen; I just think it’s less likely, for these reasons.” And, if they’re wrong, they acknowledge it, and try to figure out where their logic went astray.

That’s the honest way to deal with the inherent stochastic nature of future events. But it doesn’t tend to generate as much eye-bulging fear in its audience, which makes it less profitable.

WRSA’s response is here.

A few weeks ago Vera, who is a long-time and regular commenter at Gates of Vienna, left this comment on the news feed:

I don’t know where to post this, WRSA now mostly posts stuff without discussions underneath, so I’ll post it here. They have been an amazing resource all these many months of madness. But lately, I am having a hard time following. They seem to have bought into the mainstream narrative of scaring the crap out of everybody, all the time. If there has been a day of late when some mushroom cloud did not feature, I haven’t noticed. And NC Renegade is the same. Endless stories of bloggers and others who have made a career out of screaming doom at all and sundry.

THIS is alternative media?!? If it bleeds, it leads? If it scares you, we’ll hit you over the head with it until kingdom come? I am revolted. MSM works hard to keep the panic going. Why are “our people” jumping on that bandwagon, have you asked yourselves?

“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”

I replied to her with this:

Yes, scaring people 24/7 seems to have become a major tactic used by the Empire. For that reason, I think it’s not a good idea to join in with all the hype about whatever the current doom might be.

Doom may indeed descend upon us. Who knows? But major alternative media sites have been predicting imminent doom since at least 2008, when hyperinflation and financial collapse were said to be imminent. They were all wrong back then by at least fifteen years. Why should we believe them now?

My advice: “Be patient and watch calmly.” Plus: “Keep Occam’s Razor close at hand.”

Since then I’ve thought a lot more about the issue.

For many years it’s been obvious that the populace is being professionally scared. By that I mean that the government, major corporations, and the media deliberately contrive to frighten the general public. Agents of the state act in collusion with private interests to gin up fear among the citizenry in order to serve their own purposes. It’s a well-established principle of authoritarian and totalitarian governance that frightened citizens are easier to control and manipulate.

In recent years we’ve been subjected to a barrage of fear porn on various topics, beginning with the “pandemic” in early 2020. The scary stuff is delivered serially, with each new frightening topic emerging in the media just as the previous panic begins to wane. First COVID, then when that started to fade, monkeypox. Then came the danger of nuclear war. And through it all was woven the perennial favorite, “climate change”, the fear of which is supposed to make us give up the internal combustion engine, live in “smart cities”, and eat the bugs.

The Powers That Be seem to be keeping their options open on various other scare stories, such as UFOs or new, improved pandemics. There’s obviously a need to hold a frightening new crisis in reserve, ready to be trotted out when needed.

There’s no denying that the legacy media are deliberately pounding their audience with fear porn, day after day. But Vera is right that the alternative media are doing the same thing, albeit with a different set of preferred scary topics. Hyperinflation, mandatory vaxing and/or chipping, transhumanism, and the abolition of cash are among the most popular frighteners. And the alt-media occasionally overlap the MSM on some fear-inducers, such as the possibility of nuclear war.

The media agents of fright, whether mainstream or alternative, rely on the short memories of their audience. I remember when the climate fright first got going, back in the early to mid 1970s. But before we were told to be scared about “global warming”, the fearmongers wanted us to lie awake nights worrying about a “new ice age”. They’re hoping we’ve forgotten all that, but the archival records are available for anyone who cares to look them up.

The PTB are also hoping we’ll forget the terrifying predictions which laughably failed to come true. The coming eco-dystopia in the 1980s, for instance — John Brunner was one of its most notable proponents in The Sheep Look Up — never materialized. Pollution didn’t kill all marine life in the 1990s. The world’s oil reserves weren’t exhausted before the year 2000. Lower Manhattan still isn’t underwater, thirty or forty years after the first alarming predictions were issued.

We’re not supposed to remember any of that stuff. And I’m pretty sure most people don’t remember it. But I do.

Continue reading →

Stop The Great Replacement!

Posted on by

Old Europe Stop The Great Replacement!
by Rikard Högberg
Legatum Books
154 pages

Reviewed by Fjordman

The Swedish author Rikard Högberg recently published his book Old Europe Stop The Great Replacement! He wrote an earlier version of this book in 2002, but the second edition has been updated through 2022 and contains new chapters.[1]

The concept of The Great Replacement has been promoted by the French author Renaud Camus. In his book Le Grand Remplacement from 2011, Camus argues that a European elite is in the process of replacing the native European population with people of immigrant origin. Instead of encouraging its own native population to have enough children, politicians and policymakers are advocating for immigration to replace the deficit of young working-age people. The result of this policy is the gradual replacement of the native European population with peoples of foreign origin, without regard for heritage and cultural conditions.

This process is plainly obvious for everybody to see. Across much of Europe, from Athens to Dublin and from Lisbon to Hamburg, immigrants are rapidly replacing the natives in neighborhood after neighborhood. It has become increasingly difficult to find an ethnic Frenchman in parts of Paris, just as it has become increasingly difficult to find a native English or British person in parts of London. However, stating the obvious and pointing this fact out is met with condemnations of “racism” by bad-faith actors, making a public debate on this subject nearly impossible.

At least, you are not allowed to point out the ongoing population replacement if you criticize or oppose this development. This will at best bring ridicule and scorn. At worst, it could earn you accusations of being a dangerous extremist or even a potential terrorist. Rikard Högberg notes that you may be allowed to comment on the replacement of native Europeans in their historical homelands, but only if you applaud and support this:

“When the replacement of Europeans is described by liberal and progressive voices it is portrayed as something positive; it is welcomed by the press and politicians. However, when those who point out the negative sides of this replacement and want it to be stopped or reversed, it is labelled as a ‘conspiracy theory’ and denied by the very same press and politicians who previously lauded it.”[2]

Högberg believes that a vile replacement policy is being actively promoted by the Globalist ruling class that currently governs Western countries. They rule through false and misleading information and propaganda, rigged elections, threats, intimidation, and various forms of attacks on dissidents and freethinkers:

“Globalist actors such as George Soros and Bill Gates fund and direct obedient corporations and NGOs that do whatever they wish. Their actions all point in one direction; they want to destroy Europe. They want to replace the European population and independence with a new and easily manipulated low-wage slave population. They want to destroy people making innovations that could threaten their hegemony. They hate independent-minded people. They hate intelligent people who can think for themselves. They hate people they cannot bribe. And by extension, as a European, they hate you. They want you extinct and gone. Thus the falling birthrates in Western countries is not a slump. It is the direct result of enacted policies perpetrated by our countries’ currently most potent elements. They fund demographic institutes and ‘think tanks’ that come up with these replacement immigration policies.”[3]

Similar ideas are being pushed simultaneously through international organizations such as the UN and the EU, but also through numerous non-governmental organizations (NGOs), business forums and policy institutes. Some of them are very powerful and influential, yet do not possess any shred of democratic mandate. This includes the World Economic Forum (WEF), founded by Klaus Schwab from Germany. The WEF holds annual meetings in Davos, Switzerland for powerful investors and business leaders, political leaders, and celebrities “to shape global, regional and industry agendas.”[4]

Fortunately, major change may be coming our way. The ruling elites still control much of the information flow, but their grip on power is less firm than before. Fewer people are reading mainstream media controlled by the Globalists, and they trust what they are being told by the mass media less and less. More citizens are taking note of how duplicitous, shameless, and dishonest the Globalists are, while attempting to shield themselves from valid criticism and public scrutiny.

Continue reading →

Semantic Marxism

Posted on by

The culture war we’re currently embroiled in is part of a process of Marxist dialectics that aims to negate all significant characteristics of Western culture. We are being targeted by a host of lytic agents that serve to break down our traditional structures. When everything we know and love has been razed, then a new world can be built on the ruins by those who destroyed the old one.

The following short video is a trailer for a three-hour presentation by Stephen Coughlin and Veterans4Freedom, which will be released soon:

Hat tip: Vlad Tepes.

The Gagging of Dissent in the EU

Posted on by

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Report24:

The EU wants to get a grip on alternative media and critical reporting worldwide

At the meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, EU Commissioner Věra Jourová urged, among other things, the demonetization of free and alternative media. The pretext: fighting “disinformation” and “hate speech”. Jourová sees the EU as an absolute pioneer and would like to impose insane laws against factual criticism and expressions of opinion on the USA and, ideally, the whole world.

Non-conformity to the narratives set by the ruling leaders (and the World Economic Forum) is undesirable. This has already been shown by the massive fight against alleged “conspiracy theories” (e.g. Covid-19, mRNA gene injection, WEF, Hunter Biden’s laptop and massive censorship by Facebook and Twitter) that have now turned out to be true.

In Germany, too, the mainstream media buckled in the face of vaccine manufacturers such as BioNTech, and changed their reporting at the interjection of Big Pharma. Above all, it was the alternative and free media that repeatedly pointed to critical insights, while the mainstream remained well-behaved and obedient to the government line. This could also be described as a total failure of the so-called “fourth estate”.

But this failure of the corporate and state media is to be rewarded by politicians by wanting to finally turn off the money supply (namely financing via advertising) to the free alternatives. It is true that most of the free media have no access to the perpetuum mobile of the mainstreamers, who have now established a conglomerate of media and advertising companies — Google’s “AdSense” also largely denies these services to critical media. If the EU Commissioner for “Values and Transparency”, Věra Jourová, has her way, not only should the United States adopt the EU rules for so-called “hate speech”, but similar measures against the alleged “disinformation” should also be enforced as far as possible worldwide.

“The European advertising industry […] has confirmed that it will not monetize or support those who spread disinformation,” Jourová proudly declared. And this despite the fact that the alleged “disinformation” of the alternative and free media has proven to be correct and true over and over again in recent times, while the mainstreamers were those who only followed the narratives of the elites repeatedly and became disinformation slingshots themselves. Censorship still takes place in Europe today, just enforced by other means. The fact that Jourová claimed at one point that truths that were unwelcome for politicians are not automatically disinformation can be understood as sheer mockery, especially in view of the past three years.

Incidentally, the fact that the EU Commissioner, in obvious megalomania, raises the EU’s seemingly totalitarian approach to the only true solution for the entire world, causes some head-shaking , especially in the USA. There the so-called “First Amendment”, which contradicts the creation of regulations against alleged “hate speech”, is often still taken very seriously:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading →

Controlled Demolition

Posted on by

I assume that by now most readers have heard about the kerfuffle over several sets of classified documents that have been “discovered” in an office belonging to the president, and also at his personal residence in Delaware. I won’t bother posting any links; if for some reason you missed the story, just look at any news site to learn the details. It’s all over the MSM.

That’s one of the ways we know that a controlled demolition of the presidency of Joseph R. Biden Jr. is currently underway. If the revelations were not a deliberately planned and executed operation, the media would be burying the story.

In fact, there would have been no reason whatsoever for the information to have become public in the first place. The supposed “discovery” of the initial batch of documents took place in early November, just before the midterm elections. If the president’s men were able to bury the story for more than two months, why not just bury it forever? After all, every government agency involved is under the complete control of the same oligarchs who rigged the election and installed their puppet in the Oval Office. There was no reason for the news of the classified docs ever to see the light of day. It would have been a simple task just to deep-six them forever.

So what’s the reason for the timing? Why are they being revealed now, in mid-January?

Obviously, the news had to wait until after the midterms. But the operation couldn’t be delayed for too long after the new House was sworn in, because of the pesky little problem of the new Republican majority. In order to be elected speaker, Kevin McCarthy had to agree to the formation of a committee that is just now beginning to investigate the machinations of the intelligence wing of the Deep State. Most of the Republicans on the committee are as fully controlled by the Deep State as are the Democrats, but not all. There is a chance, a very slight chance, that one or more of those maverick Republicans might be able to shine some light into the dark corners of the Intelligence Community and reveal the activities of the scheming cockroaches who normally remain hidden behind the wainscoting or under the refrigerator.

So it’s time to trot out all those classified documents, which were carefully held in reserve until the time came when they were needed. Now we will go through a long elaborate faux-judicial process. A special counsel has been appointed. Various witnesses will be subpoenaed and deposed. Evidence will be gathered. Carefully timed leaks to the press will be arranged, so that the unfolding story can be shaped and guided via hundreds of media stories to produce the exact result that is wanted.

The pressure will gradually become unbearable, and eventually the president will be induced to resign, probably for health reasons. And there’s always the issue of his wayward son Hunter, who could be hit with far more serious criminal charges than he has seen so far. In return for an insignificant little legal slap on the boy’s wrist, Dad could agree to make a graceful exit, and then shuffle off to assisted living at some well-appointed facility in a salubrious climate, possibly in an overseas location which has no extradition treaty with the United States.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

Ever since the puppet was invested back in January of 2021, I’ve assumed there was a plan in place to term-limit him in a carefully choreographed way that would do the least possible damage to the interests of the Democrats and their masters in the permanent government. It was clear that they could never risk Joe Biden’s running for re-election, and since he has now announced his intention (presumably prodded by Dr. Jill) to do exactly that, something obviously needed to be done. And the long-prepared plan needed to be put into motion quickly, before any of those annoying non-compliant Republicans could do anything off-script.

Continue reading →

Who Would Have Thought Climate Change Could Kill So Many People So Soon?

Posted on by

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this op-ed from Report24:

New justifications for the heart attack epidemic: forgetting to breathe while clearing snow

Massive excess mortality is recorded in all vaccination countries. Heart attacks are often behind the sudden and unexpected deaths of young people. While the German magazine Focus now suspects “mistakes made when shoveling snow” as the reason, many media see a generally higher risk of heart attack in winter cold. Apparently, this also happened in summer, when it was supposedly due to summer temperatures. or in New German, CLIMATE CHANGE.

A commentary by Willi Huber

While the WHO insists (see here) that excess mortality is generally due to climate change, this excuse doesn’t really work in the bitterly cold December. This year’s winter appears to have been so cold and snowy that for the first time in many years, the hoax of the “hottest month on record” has not been attempted.

Now the German magazine Focus does not explain that terrible, sometimes fatal side effects occur as a result of the mRNA vaccination experiment. No, the background of the “strange and inexplicable” deaths must once again be veiled. This time, shoveling snow serves as an excuse. Yes, who doesn’t know them? The tens of thousands of snow shovel deaths, year after year. Grandma already warned against it — or was it Grandpa? Oh, whatever.

Three tips that really pack a punch

You have to avoid three mistakes in order to prevent a heart attack while shoveling snow. First of all, the thrice-fact-checked, reputable and independent journalists inform us that risk factor #1 is “the cold”. In winter, who would have thought? If blood vessels constrict because of the winter cold, there would be a risk of a heart attack. Point two, “wrong breathing”. You know, once you breathed wrong, already — bang! — Heart attack. You shouldn’t hold your breath when you’re exerting yourself, explains the lady in the carefully-produced Focus service video. Remember that! And third, drum roll: “Snow clearing in the morning”. That would be so exhausting that there is a risk of cardiac arrhythmia and ventricular fibrillation. Understood.

Equally entertaining are the statements that haunt the entire German-speaking media landscape as part of the campaign. An example of this is the Schweizer Blick, representative of many others who report almost identically:

The winter cold would lead to an increased risk of heart attack. Of course, the cold is not alone in this. Your friend, the summer heat is just as dangerous as cold showers, hot showers, too much joy and the like. Kindly puts the view into perspective that this only affects people who are already at increased risk, such as diabetics, hypertension patients and smokers.

Continue reading →

Confession and Apology First, Then Amnesty

Posted on by

As most readers will know by now, a popular progressive writer named Emily Oster has called for a “pandemic amnesty” that would absolve the Coronafascists and vax-pushers of guilt for their actions in the past three years. As of this writing, she has found few sympathizers among the Purebloods and vax-skeptics.

Our Israeli correspondent MC sends his take on the proposed pandemic amnesty and related matters.

Confession and Apology First, Then Amnesty

by MC

We are not very good at holding our leaders to account, and even our direst enemy’s leaders mostly get away with it.

Yes, we hanged a few as a result of the Nuremberg trials, but it is always surprising how many Nazi murderers covered up their spots and became leaders of the German ‘recovery’ or the American/Russian space efforts.

The German hierarchy destroyed millions of Jews and Slavs, leaving the common German people to carry the can, some of whom had a probably only the vaguest idea of what was actually going on. One had to be very, very brave to put one’s head above the parapet.

We in the West assume that ‘we’ are the good guys, and maybe that was mostly correct some seventy years ago, but Stalin had due cause to be wary. The dealings between Dulles and Wolff, and possibly Kammler, led to a transfer of technology to the US, but what was the quid pro quo? We may never know.

But then, we have just been through much the same thing:

First they injected the elderly and they died alone.
But I was young and fit; I did not care.
Then they injected the care workers.
But I did not care; I was not in danger.
Then it was the military; they died by numbers.
But I did not wear a uniform.
Then the pilots dropped out of the sky.
But I do not fly.
But when my time came, I bared my arm lest I, too, be outcast.
Masked, distanced, locked down and finally, dead.

We have just lived through a ‘holocaust’, but this time it was not the bullets of the Sicherheitsdienst or the gas of the Schutzstaffel.

The Holocaust itself was preceded by Action T4, which had the object of removing many ‘useless’ eaters ( the disabled, the mentally ill). These became the lab rats: they were injected with things like phenol and potassium, or they were gassed with ‘experimental’ lethal gasses (mainly bottled carbon monoxide).

In mid-1939, Hitler authorised the creation of the Reich Committee for the Scientific Registering of Serious Hereditary and Congenital Illnesses (Reichsausschuss zur wissenschaftlichen Erfassung erb- und anlagebedingter schwerer Leiden) led by his physician, Karl Brandt, administered by Herbert Linden of the Interior Ministry, leader of German Red Cross Reichsarzt SS und Polizei Ernst-Robert Grawitz and SS-Oberführer Viktor Brack. Brandt and Bouhler were authorised to approve applications to kill children in relevant circumstances, though Bouhler left the details to subordinates such as Brack and SA-Oberführer Werner Blankenburg.

Extermination centres were established at six existing psychiatric hospitals: Bernburg, Brandenburg, Grafeneck, Hadamar, Hartheim, and Sonnenstein. One thousand children under the age of 17 were killed at the institutions Am Spiegelgrund and Gugging in Austria. They played a crucial role in developments leading to the Holocaust. As a related aspect of the “medical” and scientific basis of this programme, the Nazi doctors took thousands of brains from ‘euthanasia’ victims for research.

From August 1939, the Interior Ministry registered children with disabilities, requiring doctors and midwives to report all cases of newborns with severe disabilities; the ‘guardian’ consent element soon disappeared. Those to be killed were identified as “all children under three years of age in whom any of the following ‘serious hereditary diseases’ were ‘suspected’: idiocy and Down syndrome (especially when associated with blindness and deafness); microcephaly; hydrocephaly; malformations of all kinds, especially of limbs, head, and spinal column; and paralysis, including spastic conditions”. The reports were assessed by a panel of medical experts, of whom three were required to give their approval before a child could be killed.

The Ministry used deceit when dealing with parents or guardians, particularly in Catholic areas, where parents were generally uncooperative. Parents were told that their children were being sent to “Special Sections”, where they would receive improved treatment. The children sent to these centres were kept for “assessment” for a few weeks and then killed by injection of toxic chemicals, typically phenol; their deaths were recorded as “pneumonia”. Autopsies were usually performed and brain samples were taken to be used for “medical research”. Post mortem examinations apparently helped to ease the consciences of many of those involved, giving them the feeling that there was a genuine medical purpose to the killings. The most notorious of these institutions in Austria was Am Spiegelgrund, where from 1940 to 1945, 789 children were killed by lethal injection, gas poisoning and physical abuse. Children’s brains were preserved in jars of formaldehyde and stored in the basement of the clinic and in the private collection of Heinrich Gross, one of the institution’s directors, until 2001.

Rather than liken the Covid-19 turmoil to the Holocaust, which was an exercise in real race-hatred of both Jews and Slavs, I would compare it to Aktion T4 because of its targeting of social groups rather than racial groups, and for its high level of deceit where the victims were wrested away from loving families and killed, possibly for revenue. And the medical professions must, once again, carry the burden of guilt.

Continue reading →