Rasmus Paludan is a Danish lawyer and anti-sharia activist whose videos have been featured a number of times in this space. He’s well-known for going into culturally enriched neighborhoods in Denmark (for example, Nørrebro and Vollsmose) and saying provocative things about Islam and Mohammed. Needless to say, his appearances usually require police protection.
The first video below was recorded on Parliament Hill in Ottawa last Saturday during the rally in opposition to Justin “Baby Doc” Trudeau’s immigration policies. Mr. Paludan’s talk required police protection this time, too, but not so much from culture-enrichers as from the antifas, who showed up in force to Bash the Fash.
The second video shows officers of the Parliamentary Protective Service confronting and then ejecting the antifas, who were unable to restrain their kinetic enthusiasm in their encounters with the police. They were removed before the English-language portion of the rally started.
Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading the first video.
Tomorrow morning (or rather, later this morning) there will be an important rally on Parliament Hill in Ottawa. Here’s what Vlad Tepes has to say about it:
Tomorrow morning on Parliament Hill, a last chance to voice opposition to Trudeau eliminating Canada as a nation state
The headline is not an exaggeration. It is a literal statement of fact.
Parliament Hill, Wellington St, Ottawa Canada
December 8th, at 10:00 AM for the French presentation and 11:00 for the English, which will include a speech by Maxime Bernier, leader of the closest thing we have to a libertarian party.
Be there or forever regret not at least doing this little bit to stop the end of Canada, and the Nation State as we know it.
Yes, its possible that a future leader may be able to undo this mess and get us out of the UN altogether, but the longer one waits and the worse things get, the more unfortunate the solutions tend to become. So make the effort when the effort is non-violent and using the tools of democracy.
Four girls on the basketball team of a trade school in Quebec have learned a hard lesson: You can’t make jokes about Islam. You can’t make fun of Muslims, and you mustn’t offend them.
Them’s the rules!
O wonder! How many goodly creatures are there here! How beauteous mankind is! O brave new world, That has such people in ’t!
Many thanks to Ava Lon for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
The Canadian government is soliciting input on developing anti-racism policy, and of course responses are usually weighted toward the liberal side of the political spectrum.
The government is starting off with flawed concepts and flawed statistical assumptions, but it would really help to include a better representative cross-section of society if some of your regular Canadian readers see this and fill out the poll.
Hear that, homies? Everyone in the Frozen North should take the survey and give the federal government their thoughts on cultural enrichment, WAYCISM, badthink, and similar topics.
In my opinion, however, you would be well-advised to mask your IP address first. Otherwise, you may find the RCMP a-knock-knock-knockin’ at your door…
Laura Loomer is an investigative reporter, and Faith Goldy is a former reporter for Rebel Media who is now running for mayor of Toronto.
In the following video (which was recorded yesterday) we see Ms. Loomer and Ms. Goldy having a close encounter with the luminaries of ICNA, the Islamic Circle of North America. ICNA had announced an event for October 7 called the “Carry the Light Convention” featuring Linda Sarsour. The event was billed as free and open to the public — specifically to “anyone seeking the knowledge”.
It turns out that “the public” in this particular case meant “the Muslim public” — i.e. it was using sharia terminology.
Here’s what happened when the two infidel ladies tried to get in:
As it happens, ICNA is included in the Muslim Brotherhood’s 1991 Explanatory Memorandum [pdf] as one of the groups in the “list of our organizations and the organizations of our friends”. In other words, ICNA was an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation Trial in 2008.
These are the beloved friends of Prime Minister Justin “Baby Doc” Trudeau. Since all of this is happening in Canada, I presume these earnest folks receive funding from the federal government.
Canadian here… I can attest to the accuracy of your analyses of the political situation in Canada. I just wanted to add a couple of things…
On the Federal level, we have two main parties – Trudeau’s Liberal Party, and the Conservative Party of Canada. Of course, under normal circumstances, we would hope that the latter takes over from Trudeau’s Liberals in the next election, but increasingly, many of us Canadians have become disillusioned with the federal Conservative Party, calling them “Liberal-light” because there seems to be little difference between their platform and the Liberals.
Now a new party has been formed to challenge the two dominant parties, led by a politician from Quebec who was formerly a Conservative Party member but left. His name is Max Bernier. He is a libertarian who wants to reduce government and has made some stunning criticisms of Trudeau’s immigration policies and “extreme diversity”. He just formed a new party he is calling “The People’s Party of Canada”, and many of us are very excited about his platform. He seems to be starting out with a significant popularity measured at between 6% and 10% before the party has even been formally accredited. Keep your eyes on this!
Some commenters expressed concern over this new party as it might split the vote.
In reading the comments I learned more about Trudeau. I knew he was a teacher of some sort, but one person said he was a substitute teacher and another said he was a drama teacher. In American schools, a substitute drama teacher is a warm body.
In Navy parlance, a “warm body” was some room-temperature-IQ swabbie who could tell the difference between something that was on fire and something that wasn’t on fire. This was necessary when hulls were being stripped of old paint and the friction caused by high-speed electric metal tools used to remove the old the paint could reach high temperatures, potentially causing those metal hulls to ignite. Whether modern navies still do this is questionable, but if they do, it’s another vocation for Trudeau to consider. He’d definitely look cute in a sailor suit.
Canada’s prospects are looking up. But what will they do for laughs in the frozen north without Trudeau’s socks and outlandish ethnic costumes for amusement??
By the way, Dr. Turley says that YouTube has demonetized his channel. Quelle surprise! I think he has PayPal donations set up, in addition to his Patreon subscriptions.
During last week’s OSCE/ODIHR conference in Warsaw, the Counterjihad Collective organized a side event entitled “Why Does Europe Hate Speech?” The following video from the event shows a talk given by Christine Douglass-Williams about the suppression of “hate speech” in Canada — which has grown increasingly totalitarian, especially under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for editing and uploading this video:
For links to previous articles about the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, see the OSCE Archives.
Back in July we reported on a mass shooting at a café in the Greektown district of Toronto by an allegedly mentally disturbed young man named Faisal Hussain. Mr. Hussain killed two people and wounded thirteen more before killing himself.
At the time there wasn’t much publicly available information about the gunman except for the usual sanitized boilerplate put out by the authorities and dutifully passed on by the Canadian MSM. It was obvious that information was being suppressed, and we were not being told everything the authorities knew about Faisal Hussain.
However, an official police document has now been made public, albeit in redacted form. In the following video Ezra Levant of Rebel Media analyzes this document in detail:
The following article was published earlier at Vlad Tepes in a slightly different form.
Killing Canada (Was Oh Canada!) now available free on YouTube
Michael Hansen, the maker of the important documentary Killing Europe, released his second project just this past weekend in Ottawa and Toronto called Oh Canada!, now renamed to Killing Canada.
The film in its simplest terms was about how various lawyers who champion the phoney human right not to be offended, at the expense of the genuine human right to freedom of speech, and certain government officials broke rules and used deception to cancel the showing of Killing Europe, as well as even cancelling his planned talk at the Ottawa Public Library on why and how they cancelled the film some months earlier.
Both Ottawa and Toronto audiences felt this needed to be seen by everyone, and most certainly in Canada.
And so Michael has now made it available on YouTube for free and for all.
Please send the link to all you can if you feel as strongly as we do that this movie exposes some of the truly pernicious machinery within Canada for the purposes of shutting down all discussion on certain transformational subjects. As a nation, Canada does not have a lot of chances left. One more term of Trudeau and its anyone’s guess what sort of culture and legal system Canada will have by the end. I suspect only the Swedes know for sure.
For all who appreciate Hansen’s work, please consider contributing to it here. I speak for many of us when I say that we would like him to continue making films like this one and Killing Europe. So if you feel it was worth your time, please consider donating to Michael, at least the cost of a movie ticket or two weeks subscription to the nearly fully Postmodern Netflix.
For those who have not seen Killing Europe and wish a greater contextual understanding of the documentary above, Killing Europe can be seen below in full.
Anyone who wishes to arrange a showing of either or both of these films at a local theatre, community centre or library or classroom, may download these videos from YouTube (please make sure you get at least 1080p version) and show them.
If you would like to arrange to have Michael speak to your audience after the showing, you may arrange this with him at the website www.killingfreespeech.com.
I assume the propaganda posters shown in this video were put up by the municipal government in Quebec City, or by the provincial government, or perhaps by the Federal government. In any case, the vandal who defaced them is obviously not on board with the State’s multiculti program, and needs to get his mind right. When the government catches up with him, it will be re-education time…
Many thanks to Ava Lon for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
Update from the Baron:I was using Dymphna’s computer, and forgot to log in as the Baron before posting. But this really is one of my posts.
Ten years ago, El Inglés wrote his ground-breaking essay about the dilemma that Western Europe is currently facing, “Surrender, Genocide… or What?”. It made heads explode even among certain of our supposedly “conservative” allies.
Now our long-time commenter RonaldB has added two more options in remarks about the fall of Uppsala. He was specifically addressing the situation in Sweden, but his descriptions are equally applicable to all of Western Europe and the UK, with Canada and Australia moving along right behind them. Even the USA will face the same dilemma, at least in some of our major metropolitan areas, within fifteen or twenty years, so this is something we should all be thinking about carefully.
Option #5 is “Genocide”, but I would assume it includes ethnic cleansing, which might be called “Genocide Lite”.
Remember: The most important thing about these options is not whether one or another of them is the one you prefer. There are two important questions to consider (besides the morality of the chosen solution):
1.
Is the choice politically possible? For instance, I often hear statements to the effect that “All seditious Muslims must be immediately deported, all the mosques must be closed, and all the globalist elite traitors must be tried and executed.” OK, I hear the suggestion. But it is not politically possible, neither now nor for the foreseeable future. So why bother discussing it?
2.
Is the choice viable? That is, even if it is politically possible, would it work? Can it accomplish its goals, or is it almost certain to fail? It’s my contention that partition might be just barely possible in political terms (after all, it was implemented in India in 1947), but it is not viable — it would fail, and fail quickly. Western Europe and India are very different cases.
Dymphna and I will shortly be going out for a little while. Y’all can start the discussion, and when we get back, we’ll moderate the comments.
Here’s what RonaldB had to say:
1.
Surrender
This is indistinguishable from what they’re doing now. Withdraw the police, allow sharia law, sharia enforcement police, sharia courts to do as they wish, and continue sending in welfare and public assistance, including housing and medical care, for any Muslim from the area who applies for it.
2.
Partition
Build a wall or impenetrable fence around the area, move any Muslims or immigrants in the surrounding area into the partitioned territory, and leave it alone. The main difference between this and surrender is that people from inside the area will not be allowed into Sweden, and no assistance will be given. They can apply to the EU, Saudi Arabia, or anyone else who wants to give them money. Whether they starve will no longer be a concern.
3.
Mass expulsions
This will take some real planning, as a place must be found to expel the immigrants to. The Israelis had the right idea: pay a head tax to some local despot for every head he accepts, and don’t concern yourself too much with what happens to them after they get there.
4.
A horrific crackdown, completely discarding individual rights
A simple military movement will not have much effect, because the organized Muslims can simply assassinate anyone who gets in their way. You would have to have a security apparatus akin to Saddam Hussein’s secret police, or Savak or the British Tans who controlled Ireland. The city would be treated as occupied territory. Unfortunately, the welfare and aid would probably continue under this scenario.
5.
Genocide
There are so many other ways of handling this that genocide would be profoundly immoral.
Afterword
Those are all the possibilities I can think of. I don’t think there is a possibility of putting a lid on the situation and pretending it’s been settled. The Muslims feel its time to assert their control, so they’re now in the last stages of jihad and aren’t about to pull back for bribes or appeals to reason or civic pride.
During a talk at a recent rally in Quebec, Prime Minister Justin “Baby Doc” Trudeau was interrupted by a woman who repeatedly demanded answers to questions about reimbursement for the cost of illegal immigrants. She was loud enough to get Mr. Trudeau’s attention and divert him from his prepared remarks.
The first half of the following video shows the interruptions by the impertinent woman, with English subtitles. The second half (untranslated) shows her being approached by an undercover cop for the RCMP, who takes hold of her by the arm and tells her that she will have to come with him. She resists, and eventually manages to get her arm loose. She’s a very spirited woman, and upbraids the cop vigorously for bruising her arm.
Apparently he tells her that she was threatening the prime minister, which she derisively denies. When asked for her ID, she says she’s doesn’t have any with her, and no, she’s not going to tell him her name.
If more Westerners were like this woman, it would be a lot harder for our mendacious leaders to foist off millions of third-world immigrants on us and still get re-elected.
For a version of the second half with a close-captioned translation, see this YouTube video.
Many thanks to the anonymous translator, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
This mosque in Ottawa lost its status as a charity for hate speech against Jews, gays, and women.
As the narrator, Alexandra Belaire, points out, they have many verified incidents of hate speech plus one member who tried to join ISIS (who is now sitting in prison), and yet they haven’t been brought before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal?? Hey, if it was good enough for Mark Steyn, why isn’t it suitable to stitch up these guys?
You’ll notice some wind interference, but it was shot by Vlad Tepes, so blame him, eh? Turning on the caption feature eliminates any problems with comprehension. That’s why it’s here…for your edification.
