Your Secret Decoder Ring

The following text by Vlad Tepes appeared in his links post last Wednesday in a slightly different form:

This one [video] might deserve a few words though. One of the issues that comes up now and again is the confusion people have with the notion that the left is somehow hypocritical. They are not. They are using Marxist dialectics to achieve a certain outcome. This isn’t hypocrisy because it isn’t a moral failing on their part (from their perspective), or a lack of vision.

A couple of recent examples of dialectics could be when Trudeau went to Japan and lectured Italy’s newly elected female Prime Minister on her quite rational policies concerning group rights for people with non-standard sexual practices. Trudeau publicly admonished her for failing to deconstruct and ultimately criminalize the values that made her country the source of Western Civilization in many ways. He did this in Japan. Probably the least diverse nation on Earth with policies of both systemic racism and racism by cultural norms. Not that I am judging that. Japan has a right to protect and enjoy its own culture, which clearly works for them as they have a staggeringly successful nation with low crime, massive trust, efficient operations, clean streets, low drug use and so on and so on and so on. But it is interesting that Trudeau did not attempt to lecture the Japanese leader on his failure to destroy his own country with Marxist policies of diversity, equity and inclusion, deciding to focus on Italy instead.

Also we have not heard Trudeau comment on the Chinese policy of not allowing effeminate men to appear on television. I think Canada should send the entire CBC to China. That’ll learn ‘em. If CBC can benefit China half as much as it benefits Canada, Canada won’t have to worry about Chinese influence anymore or Marxist manifest destiny, and China won’t be a threat to anyone much longer.

Another example is the designation of “oligarch” to a person as opposed to “philanthropist”. Bill Gates and George Soros are somehow philanthropists while any rich, powerful and connected person who uses his wealth for the counter-revolution is an oligarch. So this is dialectical. Not hypocrisy, because it is the weaponization of concepts and language through multiple means to create an outcome which always moves the culture and nation to the left. Always more state control. Islamophobia as a pejorative is usually used when someone says something true about Islam. It shuts people up and moves the focus of evil intent to the messenger. This is not hypocrisy. This is dialectics. Like “climate denial”, “transphobia” and many other devices intended to be destructive to every aspect of our civilization.

The host of this video may also be shy of the whole nature of his own point in his analysis of what Democrats mean when they say “democracy”. This is a dialectic term as well. They are using what Stephen Coughlin refers to as “initiate language”. They are using the term “democracy” as Lenin did when he named his party “The Socialist Democrat Party” in Russia. The US Democrats have a core that is called the DSA or Democratic Socialists of America. They know perfectly well what they mean when they use the term. They also know how we hear the term and what we think they mean.

This was also a constant when Islam was the key threat. Mohamed Morsi’s party in Egypt was called the Freedom and Justice Party. This was to garner Western support. But they meant it to be freedom to implement the sharia, and justice being Islamic justice, or sharia. And yes, this was known by Obama when he backed Morsi at the time and moving forward after Al Sisi was installed by the Egyptian people/army. So they are not being hypocritical. They are just doing what they did with the mRNA injections. Renaming it to make people accept something they would never have accepted had it been named honestly.

This is dialectics. A big word for a simple idea. But a difficult one to accept. Because those of us born and raised in the West always have thought of language as a way of being understood, not as a way of confounding and abusing. Honesty is a virtue in a Western and Judeo-Christian-Greco-Roman civilization. And lies are usually for personal gain or protection, and not weapons for civilizational attack. Once this is understood though, it becomes your cereal box, secret decoder ring for all we see around us today.

2 thoughts on “Your Secret Decoder Ring

  1. Cognitive scientists have long understood that speech and thought are intimately connected; indeed some scholars believe them to be all but inseparable. Those who wish to gain and exercise control over others are well-aware of this relationship. Hence, they seek to subvert, control and channel language to their own ends, so that they may eventually control thought itself.

    Forty years ago when I was studying biology and other sciences, the word “gender” was virtually never encountered in the scientific literature devoted to the anatomical and physiological differences between male and female humans.

    Biologists speak of “sex” and “sexual” or “asexual” reproduction, to name a few examples. Apart from the small fraction of people born with genetic sexual disorders such as Klinefelter’s Syndrome, all humans belong either to the male or female sex at birth. This is at the chromosomal level. Geneticists recognize no “genders” as far as I am aware.

    So then, why was the word “gender” created? The answer is that as long as the word “sex” was used, and as long as it retained its immutable character, the Cultural Marxists (otherwise known these days as the ‘Woke’ crowd) could not twist the whole notion of sexual identity into a pretzel. They could not play the games of power that they wanted to play – so they changed the game by inventing a new word, and then a whole new group of words surrounding their original invention.

    In George Orwell’s “1984,” the Party or “Big Brother” invents “Newspeak,” a regime-approached form of language designed to funnel power to the controllers and away from the people themselves. “Oldspeak,” the way the people had always spoken, was outlawed.

    The controllers full well knew the intimate connection between language and thought; their ultimate target was not to outlaw certain words and forms of expression, it was to outlaw thought itself, especially thoughts not approved by the regime.

    Like the Party in “1984,” today’s Cultural Marxists of the “Woke” movement seek to outlaw speech of they do not approve and ultimately thoughts based upon that speech.
    This is motive, the driving force, behind so many recent attempts by the Left to “fact-check,” censor, delete, control, defame, or marginalize those whose expression – whose words and thoughts – do not conform to their ideology.

  2. The Alt Right, variously MAGA and Trump-flavoured, thinks nostalgically back to the Reagan 1980s and their heropersons Ollie North and Jeanne Kirkpatrick, when Pinochet and Somoza and Stroessner and Videla really socked it to the Commies in LatAm.

    Vlad and others remind me of this.

    And to save their idealised free market, the one that leads eventually to the 99%, you know? …ie what they call “genuine” capitalism from the bad odour of the post-1990 billionaire class who are the economic beneficiaries of Black Rock, State Street and Vanguard, the Alt Right has to try to confuse Communitarianism a la Klaus Schwab, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communitarianism with Communism.

    Whereas were Marx with us today, and apprised of IT and nanotech advances since 1990 on the back of unfunded Western pension liabilities, he would likely and correctly predict that the owners of Capital would try to launch a demoralisation/surveillance/depopulation Great Reset by way of a WEF/WHO totalitarian putsch with a legal veneer in the form of the IHR and Pandemic Treaty.

    Especially as people are hackable animals, as Harari says, and the Moderna website talks of the mRNA as “software”

    Funding for BLM, Antifa and the Genderists included so as to cause chaos and mutual hatred among the dispossessed.

    So Vlad and others should really Follow the Money, they can start with the gender-ist Prizkers and Stryker in the USA, https://jbilek.substack.com/p/who-is-behind-the-trans-agenda

Comments are closed.