Time Flies When You’re Having Fun

Our friend Covid-19 is four years old today — hard to believe, isn’t it?

Not everybody celebrates the anniversary on the same date. Some people identify the 16th as the day the “pandemic” began, when a lot of the lockdowns kicked in and the school closings started. But I prefer the Ides of March. It was a Sunday in 2020, when church was cancelled for the first time.

Happy Birthday, Wuhan Coronavirus!

Our Dystopian Moment

The two videos below are unrelated; I just happened to encounter them both today. They seem somehow emblematic of the apocalyptic times that we Americans are forced to live through.

The first clip shows remarks made by Peter Navarro at CPAC. Mr. Navarro is an economist who served as a presidential advisor during the Trump administration. After the “election” of 2020 he, like so many other Trump associates, became a target of the January 6 Inquisition when the Democrats were in control of the House. He refused to comply with a congressional subpoena to provide documents and testimony, and was charged with two counts of contempt of Congress. After being convicted on both counts, he was sentenced to four months in prison. He is appealing the verdict, but the judge ruled that he must serve his sentence in the meantime.

I don’t have any opinion on Peter Navarro, nor any idea on the merits of the legal cases against him. However, I know that the treatment of him is shameless political persecution. The mickey-mouse stuff he was accused of doing would have merited no notice if he had been a Democrat, or served under an elected pol with a “D” after his name. He is being persecuted because he had the temerity to hitch his star to the evil Orange Man.

He made the following remarks just prior to beginning his prison sentence:

The second video is an excerpt from Tucker Carlson’s interview with the inventor and entrepreneur Steve Kirsch. Mr. Kirsch has great expertise in statistical methods, and since early 2021 he has been investigating the statistics on the adverse effects of the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus. He has done great service to his country by digging up and exposing to public view the ghastly figures on the adverse effects, especially deaths, caused by the vax. The CDC and the other panjandrums of the political-corporate power structure are doing their utmost to marginalize and shun him so that the general public will never become aware of the harm the government has done by coercing them to get jabbed.

I watched the full interview, which is almost an hour long, but it has since been taken down, presumably because TCN is zealously protecting its copyright. The video below shows only the first eleven minutes, but it will at least give you a taste of what Steve Kirsch had to say:

Hat tips: Vlad Tepes and Steen.

Robert Fico: Our Governments Bowed to the Pharmaceutical Companies

The following video features remarks made by Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico to his country’s parliament. As far as I know, this represents the first time any head of a Western government has called out the corrupt predatory practices of governments in symbiosis with the pharmaceutical industry during the COVID-19 “pandemic”. He even highlights the corrupt relationship between Pfizer and Ursula von der Leyen, the current president of the European Commission. For his sake, I hope he has a food taster on his staff.

The subtitles were timed using the official English translation of Mr. Fico’s remarks. Many thanks to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Do the COVID-19 Vaccines Demonstrate the Collapse of Science?

Note: One version of this essay was first published in Norwegian at the website Document.no. It has been translated into English here with considerable aid from reader Free Sweden.

Do the COVID-19 vaccines demonstrate the collapse of science?

by Fjordman

John Campbell from England has been making popular videos on YouTube for several years.[1] He has gone from being a supporter of the officially promoted vaccines against the coronavirus COVID-19 to becoming a growing critic of them. He has done this by analyzing official statistics and known figures. The facts show that these vaccines are less effective against COVID-19 than originally claimed. They are also significantly more dangerous than people who took these vaccines were told by the authorities.

Substantial excess mortality rates that have yet to receive a convincing official explanation can be documented over an extended period. This began in part in 2021. The excess deaths have continued in many countries in 2022 and 2023, and unfortunately seem to continue in the UK [2] and elsewhere in 2024.

Campbell has had some very interesting conversations with Angus G. Dalgleish. He is a British professor of oncology, the study of cancer, at St. George’s Hospital Medical School in London. Dalgleish has been very active in the medical field for decades. He is the editor and co-author of the book The Death of Science: The Retreat from Reason in the Post-Modern World.[3]

Stating that science is dead, as the title suggests, may sound dramatic. Yet professor Dalgleish fears that this claim is not an exaggeration. He is highly critical of the way authorities have handled COVID-19 and the vaccines against this virus since the year 2020. Far too much of what is now being presented as scientific research is flawed, logically questionable or marred by corruption.

Angus G. Dalgleish focuses on medical issues, which are his area of expertise. However, he also questions the claim that we are indeed experiencing a man-made “climate crisis.” He argues that scientific data does not support the most alarmist claims about climate change. There is also a lot of money involved in these fields, both in the pharmaceutical industry and in the climate industry.

In 2020, the major US pharmaceutical company Pfizer partnered with Germany’s BioNTech to rapidly develop a vaccine against the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine was introduced at the end of 2020.

The American pharmaceutical and biotechnology company Moderna also rushed to develop an mRNA-based vaccine at the same time, with support and encouragement from the US government.

Before Pfizer and Moderna launched their vaccines, with unusually quick approval from Western governments, mRNA-based technology had never been used on humans on a large scale. It differs significantly from traditional vaccine technology. Some critics claim that these mRNA-based injections should be referred to as experimental genetic technology, rather than as vaccines in a traditional sense of the word.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla himself stated in October 2020 that the company was “moving at the speed of science.”[4] Bourla later remarked that “It took us just 248 days to get from the day we announced our plans to collaborate with BioNTech on a potential Covid-19 vaccine to the day we submitted to the FDA for Emergency Use Authorization. We were able to move at extraordinary speed, while always maintaining our focus on safety, because this new structure allows us to be decisive.”[5]

On the social network Facebook, Pfizer also posted a video about their so-called vaccines in November 2020 entitled Moving at the Speed of Science.[6]

However, how fast is “the speed of science”? Is it 100 kilometers per hour? 1 centimeter per hour? One centimeter per year?

Continue reading

Pfizer: In-House Dissent

Dissent concerning the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus has been disparaged, suppressed, and in some jurisdictions prosecuted by the state. Yet it never went away; it just went underground. According to the story below, this was even true of people employed by the Pfizer corporation.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Uncut News:

Pfizer employees talk about injections: This news has never been published before

In August of 2021, Pfizer made its mRNA coronavirus vaccine mandatory for employees in the United States. Many employees did not want to be vaccinated.

They created a chat group where they shared their reservations, concerns and all kinds of misbehavior. Hundreds of employees were members of the group, including high-ranking executives. Melissa McAtee, a former Pfizer employee and whistleblower, posted some of the messages on X because she wanted the world to know what was going on.

The lawyer Carine Knapen read them and found that they contained some hallucinatory things: the product glows in the dark, the product is deadly, and once the expiration date expires, the expiration date stickers are simply replaced with new ones.

Someone also points out that this is all about money, and Pfizer, but also Merck and Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) have their own SWAT teams. McAtee says she trusts the person who wrote it.

Someone else writes that all batches cause major problems. Another says they probably know the vaccine is garbage and will kill people, but they’re rolling it out anyway to make money.

Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine was developed using CRISPR-Cas9, a technology that works like scissors. Part of the DNA is cut out and replaced with a different sequence. CRISPR-Cas9 is gene therapy or genetic engineering.

McAtee has already stated that she is not at risk herself.

When Pfizer mandated the vaccine for its employees in August 2021, some of my colleagues formed a “Phyzer Vaxx Council,” which included hundreds of us, among them senior employees. Every day we discussed the evils being done and what we had to just pretend things were normal. I will also add internal Pfizer emails, proof of my employment, and just plain nonsense from the company to this post. Enjoy, these have never been seen or posted anywhere else. Names have been redacted to protect those still at the plant or who have not agreed to have their names published.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

Hungarian President: “In many families, there is almost constant sickness”

Our Hungarian correspondent László has done a detailed analysis of the startling remarks made by Hungarian President Katalin Novák in her New Year’s address to the nation. After he wrote his initial analysis, the transcript of Ms. Novák’s speech was removed from the media site where it had been posted, and the state broadcaster dubbed her speech at the critical point so that her problematic remarks could no longer be heard.

László adds this note:

I assume the president wasn’t supposed to tell us that snippet of truth about our “constant sickness” and the state of “our immune systems”. But at least now we know that they know. And now they will know that we know that they know. And now we also know that they care that we know.

Update from László, posted in the comments after I went to bed:

The two articles in question became available again on Magyar Nemzet after a while (before this post on GoV was published) — and they are there now as I’m writing this comment. It’s difficult to know what machinations have been going on in the background.

I assume that with the temporary removal of the transcript of the speech, the media outlet might have intended to bypass the period of peak traffic in order to do some damage control. I mean, after a day the public’s interest in the president’s speech naturally drops, plus it is not on the front pages any more — so it could be reinstated.

In the meantime I also learned that there was a cyber attack against several Hungarian conservative media outlets yesterday. But since “future cyber attacks” have been heralded by the WEF, we cannot trust even cyber attacks to be genuine, can we?…

And this is the very nature of this war that we just don’t get to know what They do to us and why. Therefore what exactly was behind the temporary deletion doesn’t matter that much to me now.

What remains however, is the president’s strange statement about the “constant sickness” of the populace, and the fact that she connected that to the state of “our immune systems”.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

“As if our immune systems have been weakened”: Hungarian President’s New Weird Order Address to the Nation

Original analysis written by László on 1 January 2024:

Hungarian President Katalin Novák’s 2023 New Year’s Eve address to the nation was as weird as it could get. In the translation below I have highlighted the parts that sound very NWO to me. Actually, I think only the highlighted parts are interesting — the rest only serves as context for this post.

The president’s weirdest statement is the first highlighted sentence (see the transcript of her speech below) about the “constant sickness” in “many families” in Hungary. Katalin Novák said:

“In many families, there is almost constant sickness, as if our immune systems have been weakened.”

As if…

Is it an attempt to do damage control after the mass effects of the Poison Poke can no longer be hidden? “…as if our immune systems have been weakened,” she suggests, and apparently attributes this weakening to the fact that “the world is a roiling sea around us”:

“The world is a roiling sea around us. Whirlwinds rage, stormy waves crash everywhere. War in Ukraine and now in Israel, mass protests, economic and political uncertainty. Here at home, anxiety, the struggle for everyday life. Life is more expensive, spending has to be considered, reserves have had to be tapped.”

Yeah, anything but the Jab…

Note also in the transcript that below the Katalin Kariko cult can never end in Hungary.

Beware the roiling seas!

Update by László (2 January 2024):

The transcript of the president’s speech seems to have been scrubbed from the only source (magyarnemzet_hu) that first posted it. At least for me, the original link of the transcript returns a 404 error message. And the transcript has been deleted from another link of the same media outlet as well… making it a pattern. I also noticed that the Hungarian state TV has dubbed her speech at the critical sentence so that it cannot be heard:

“In many families, there is almost constant sickness, as if our immune systems have been weakened.”

So I had to use the Wayback Machine in order to retrieve the original transcript, only one day after it was published by Magyar Nemzet. That said, the whole video of her speech is still available on Facebook where her PR team posted it, and the sentence in question can be heard at 3:07.

I can only guess what has happened in the meantime, but if I use Occam’s Razor with the information that’s available to me, the president’s PR advisors or some journalists must have noticed that she made a serious mistake, and now they decided to silently delete it from the public mind without creating a Streisand Effect. (At least one regional paper that had taken the transcript over from Magyar Nemzet still has it on their site.)

Continue reading

The COVID Corruption Business

The huge amounts of “pandemic” money sloshing around in the budgets of various Western countries were an invitation to all sorts of grifters to put their snouts into the trough. The following scandal from Belgium is the latest to emerge. It seems that a politically connected operator was able to grease the right palms and get a lucrative (€50 million) COVID-money deal redirected to a favored crony.

Kathleen Depoorter is a member of the federal Belgian parliament for the New Flemish Alliance (Nieuw-Vlaamse Alliantie, N-VA). In the following video she calls out the country’s political leadership about the Corona money scandal.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

English-language articles about this scandal are scarce. The one below was the most comprehensive I could find. I realize that BNN Breaking is a deprecated source, but those who read French will find that this article from the Belgian state broadcaster RTBF lines up well with the BNN Breaking story:

Belgium’s Health Ministry Embroiled in Contract Controversy: A Deep Dive

by Ebenezer Mensah
December 9, 2023

In the heart of Belgium, a dispute has arisen, casting a shadow over Health Minister Frank Vandenbroucke and the Federal Public Service (SPF) Health Public. At the core of the controversy is the awarding of a public contract initially entrusted to Belgian SME Medista, for the distribution and storage of strategic reserve of medicines, COVID-19 tests, and vaccines. In 2022, the contract was transitioned to French multinational company Movianto, bringing the fairness of the process under scrutiny.

Medista Cries Foul

Medista, holder of the contract from 2020 to 2022, contested the decision, alleging that an SPF Health Public official unfairly assisted Movianto. In an attempt to validate their claims, Medista presented evidence, including hidden camera videos obtained with the assistance of Black Cube, a private investigation firm staffed by ex-members of the Israeli intelligence service.

Medista also claimed unpaid invoices amounting to EUR 5.3 million from the SPF, unsuccessfully challenging the contract award in the Council of State, and sought to amicably settle the dispute.

Continue reading

A Litmus Test of Free Speech

The following article from Austria is an example of what I have termed the Screaming Nazi Heeber-Jeebers. This case, however, is more than just social ostracism or media hysteria: the stigmatized victim lost his basic right to travel outside the country.

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff sends this introduction to the case:

Gottfried Küssel is not a sympathetic man. He is a convicted neo-Nazi who appears to be a true believer in National Socialism. However, he is now a free man, having served his sentence. And as a free man he has a right to travel, which entails owning a passport. So far, so logical. Not in the Republic of Austria, governed by a center-left coalition that has been going after anything and anyone resembling a right-of-center political view for the past four years. Mind you, there are no definitions of what is allowed to be uttered in the public sphere, and one only knows after the fact that one shouldn’t have said “that”, whatever “that” is. Free speech certainly looks different.

Gottfried Küssel has now decided he wants to travel, and applied for a passport, which was denied by the authority citing a perceived “security threat” emanating from Küssel. The security threat was not explained further, other than referring to Küssel’s attendance at Covid rallies, where “conspiracy theories and anti-Semitic stories” were propagated, and his being a critic of the government and still “part of a right-wing network.” This should make freedom-lovers shudder for the following reasons:

  • Küssel is denied a passport for crimes yet to be committed, for words yet to be uttered. How is this rationale considered worthy in a liberal democracy?
  • Küssel is denied the right to travel because he attended a rally. He has the right to protest, just like everybody else in a liberal democracy. This is called freedom of assembly, guaranteed by numerous human rights conventions.
  • Küssel merely attended the rallies. He apparently never uttered a word. How is this a reason worthy of denying the right to travel?
  • Küssel was critical of a government that has denied a substantial part of the population their human rights. How is denouncing the government’s rules worthy of denying a passport?

Finally, if the government can easily deny Mr. Küssel, a law-abiding citizen, a passport simply because he “might endanger” the “internal and external” security of Austria, it can happen to you and me. This is how it starts. This is a warning.

You might wonder why I defend Mr. Küssel, whose political beliefs are abhorrent to me. The answer is simple: Mr. Küssel’s case can be considered a litmus test of free speech: you may not like what Mr. Küssel has to say or what he stands for, but he must have the right to say whatever he has to say. It’s not easy to be a free speech activist as it entails defending the indefensible. But it must be done to preserve the right to free speech.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from OE24. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

The city of Vienna does not give Gottfried Küssel a passport
MA 62 fears that convicted right-wing extremists could endanger Austria’s internal or external security abroad

The city of Vienna refuses to issue Gottfried Küssel a passport. The passport authority relies on a provision in the Passport Act, which stipulates that an applicant for a passport must be refused the document if it can be assumed that a stay abroad would endanger Austria’s internal or external security. For the lawyer Michael Dohr, Küssel’s legal representative, this justification is outrageous. He wants to fight the decision.

Küssel applied for a passport from MA 62 [Registration Office] in mid-August of 2023. In connection with his last of a total of three convictions for National Socialist recidivism, his passport and identity card were confiscated in the summer of 2016. The Administrative Court (VwGH) later confirmed this decision. When Küssel — a key figure in the neo-Nazi scene in German-speaking countries — was released from prison in January 2019 after serving seven years and nine months in prison, he had no opportunity to travel abroad legally.

Security of Austria [And I’m pretty sure that importing millions of hostile Muslims without passports is good for security.]

From the point of view of MA 62, nothing will change for the time being. The authority not only points to the passport applicant’s tarnished past, which suggests a threat to the security of the republic if he were to be allowed to travel abroad. In addition, the passport authority obtained a statement from the Directorate of State Security and Intelligence (DSN). [Directorate of State Security? Sounds like something from the time of the TERROR in France 200+ years ago.] It initially states that since spring 2020, Küssel has taken part in numerous events critical of the government, particularly those aimed at the Covid-19 measures. In particular he appeared at demonstrations in Eisenstadt as a “declarant and person in charge”: “At these rallies, among other things, conspiracy theories and anti-Semitic stories were propagated.”

In addition, Küssel coordinated with other organizers of anti-Covid-19 protests, whereby “violent actions were also considered or propagated,” the DSN notes. Küssel is also active on the Internet and in social media and stands out as a critic of the government and with right-wing radical views, “which, however, have not yet resulted in any complaints under the StGB (penal code, note) or VG (prohibition law, which makes National Socialist recidivism punishable. Annotation)”. The fact that the man, who has been convicted several times in this line, is still part of a right-wing network is undisputed, at least according to the DSN: “Finally, it should be noted that Küssel has demonstrably maintained contacts with other people from the Austrian right-wing extremist scene over the last few years (especially since the spring of 2020).”

Continue reading

Italian Vax Promoter Investigated For Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Murder

Former Italian Minister of Health Roberto Speranza is being officially investigated by the prosecutor’s office in Rome for his actions in promoting the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus.

Many thanks to HeHa for translating this video report, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Digital Dystopia

The European Union is implementing a digital ID, which will be coupled with the digital euro and personal health data (an extension of the “vaccine passport”) to produce a comprehensive digital profile for each EU citizen. It’s not hard to see the erosion of personal privacy that will emerge out of this digital gulag.

Dominik Kettner is a German entrepreneur whose specialty is the precious metals trade, and is also a prolific vlogger who produces numerous videos on finance-related topics. In the following video he talks about the implementation of the digital euro, and the danger it poses to the civil liberties of European citizens.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

No Cabinet Wilders

Despite his resounding victory at the polls, I have always assumed Geert Wilders would never be able to form a cabinet — the Dutch oligarchs simply would not allow it. And indeed, according to our Dutch correspondent H. Numan, that seems to be the case.

No cabinet Wilders

by H. Numan

Gentle men and women, I’ve got bad news. Very bad indeed: a cabinet Wilders wont’ be coming. The elites will not allow it. They want to go for the other option: a conservative-communist cabinet. They aren’t negotiating to form a coalition, far from it. They’re negotiating in bad faith, trying to blame Wilders for their own mistakes. I have lived almost exactly 30 years in Thailand. In that time I witnessed many coups, coup attempts, coup attempts through the courts and failed coup attempts. My coup senses are tingling right now. I may be off, but I’m really worried I’m right.

The Dutch elections resulted in two viable cabinet options:

  • A center-right cabinet with PVV, VVD, NSC and BBB. That cabinet would have 88 seats. BBB has only 7, but would be invited to counter a VVD-NSC majority.
  • An ultra left-wing cabinet with PvdGL (Labor/Communists), NSC, VVD, D66. That cabinet would have 78 seats, 2 more seats than the bare minimum.

Other combinations are not possible. In both cases VVD and NSC have to decide which way they want to go. They only want to join a conservative coalition if forced to at gunpoint, otherwise they would much rather commit suicide by joining an ultra-progressive coalition.

It will take a long time before negotiations are finalized. Maybe even a full year. Forming a coalition is always difficult, mainly because politicians are extremely sensitive. In theory we could have a cabinet next week. PVV is a split-off from the VVD. They don’t differ that much on most topics. NSC is a rebranding of the CDA, and they don’t differ that much from the PVV either. It isn’t the policies that differ, but the people.

Before the elections Pieter Omtzigt (NSC) kept to the PVV boycott, despite a lot of opposition from his electorate. They are staunch conservatives, and definitely prefer a PVV cabinet. However, Omtzigt does not. The people he surrounds himself with who follow the leader are left-wing (ex) CDA politicians who also don’t want anything to do with the PVV. What the voters think is rather irrelevant to Omtzigt and his clique. He does exactly what he wants and nobody can convince him otherwise.

That’s why he was ostracized out of the CDA. It’s extremely difficult to work with someone who is borderline autistic. In case he doesn’t get his way, he’ll have or pretend to have a nervous breakdown. He has done it before, and will do it again. Imagine an unruly child throwing a temper tantrum to get what it wants. That’s Pieter Omtzigt.

Apart from that, his ideas are completely impossible to begin with. ‘We have to restructure our civil service’ sounds great, until you actually have to do it. Another one of his brain farts is a constitutional court. We don’t have one in The Netherlands. He wants to check all laws (especially those made by Wilders) in court. Hello? Anybody home? It’s a well known fact our courts are staffed by predominantly D66 judges, who hate Wilders so much they are even risking mistrials for it. Even, in the unlikely case he does gets his way, it will be years in the future. Kind of silly to say that Wilders has to follow the law to the letter, whereas his legal ideas don’t even exist.

There is even more. I told you a couple of years ago about a memo leaked by accident by the scouts of the previous cabinet. It showed ‘Omtzigt alternative position’ clearly to journalists who eagerly picked it up. Now of all people, the very same Omtzigt walks around with a memo ostentatiously showing ‘no PVV-NSC-BBB cabinet’. That’s very sick humor to me. Feeling mortally insulted when it happens to you, but a funny joke if you can repeat it on someone else.

The other person — yes, it’s personal — who hates Wilders is Dilan Yeşilgöz, the Dutch/Turkish/Kurdish leader of the VVD. During the elections she pretended a cabinet with the PVV was a possibility for her. However, the day before the election, she backpedaled on that. She doubted a cabinet with the PVV was possible. After the election she went even further. She doesn’t want to be part of the coalition because that would prevent her from being able to kill the coalition!

Continue reading

Pfizer Knew the Vax Was Poison

In its own analytical documents, the Pfizer corporation classified its experimental mRNA treatment (in this case, under the trade name Comirnaty) as “very highly hazardous”. It did not announce this finding publicly, nor did it endeavor to make potential recipients of the treatment aware of the risk. Not to inform patients of the dangers was highly illegal, but it didn’t matter — Pfizer is too big to punish. No one involved in the process will ever be held accountable. No one will go to jail. And the major players will go to their graves as extremely wealthy people.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the German blog TKP:

Pfizer classifies its own C19 modRNA product as “highly dangerous”

The modRNA products are moved through the body with the help of so-called lipid nanoparticles and transfected into the cells. The two lipids used by Pfizer, ALC-0159 and ALC-0315, had no approval before 2020 except for “research purposes”. In Pfizer’s safety data sheets they are assigned a medium toxic potential; in the syringe they cause a “high toxic potential.” It’s unbelievable that the authorities would allow something like this to be injected into the upper arms.

TKP published a detailed analysis on December 9, 2021. It quotes the company that produces these lipids. She writes on her website: “ALC-0159 is one of the components of the BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, along with ALC-0315, DSPC and cholesterol. This product is for research use only and not for human use.”

And further: ALC-0159 and ALC-0315 are discussed in the EMA Assessment Report for the first conditional marketing authorization starting on page 22.

It says:

“All excipients except the functional lipids ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 and the structural lipid DSPC comply with the Ph. Eur. The functional lipids ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 are classified as novel excipients. The two structural lipids DSPC and cholesterol are used in several finished products that have already been approved.”

And further:

“The finished medicinal product contains two novel excipients, the cationic lipid ALC-0315 and the PEGylated lipid ALC-0159. Only limited information is provided about the new excipients.”

Tobias Ulbrich writes in an X/Twitter post:

Topic today: “OEB [Occupational Exposure Band] 5 = high toxic potential — can anyone explain please? Pfizer — for “Process2??”

Today I had to rub my eyes several times because I couldn’t believe what I was reading. So the lipid nanoparticles (LNP), which BioNTech also uses, the ALC0159 and ALC0315 are given OEB 3, i.e. hazardous, translated as “dangerous”.

Now the modRNA — i.e. the modified RNA — in which Process2 was once obtained using E. coli bacteria and plasmids comes into such an LNP. The entire “Comirnaty” package, which has been assigned the code PF-07302048, is then classified after the “marriage” with the modRNA in hazard class OEB 5, i.e. very highly hazardous, or https://containment-technology.com/oeb-stufen/ as it says there “high toxic potential”. So, how do you know that PF-07302048 is actually Comirnaty? To do this, you have to look at the safety data sheet from “Comirnaty” dated December 7th, 2021. The security codes and the assignment to Comirnaty are stored there. Now you can of course say that the classification affects handling.

But it works from just 1 microgram. We remember — the adult dose is 30 micrograms and some of our clients have 5 or more of them. The public classification as completely harmless and “free of side effects” cannot be reconciled with the rating of the manufacturer itself and the OEB 5 classification. The fact that ALC0159 and ALC0315 in isolation without modRNA are “only” classified as “dangerous”, but the entire product is suddenly classified as “very highly dangerous” requires an explanation that cannot solely be based on occupational safety. If a person being vaccinated had known of the OEB 5 classification beforehand, no one would have gotten the injection.

Further documents such as the entire data sheet can be found here.

Continue reading

From Brainwashing to Turbo Cancers: The Legacy of the Vax

The fourth session of the International Crisis Summit met earlier this month in the Romanian parliament building in Bucharest. The Summit is focused on the social and political issues associated with the artificially-engineered crisis surrounding the Wuhan Coronavirus, and the “vaccines” that were rolled out to deal with it.

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff was in Bucharest for the Summit, and reported on her experience for the RAIR Foundation. In the introduction to her report, she says:

The International Covid Summit, a grassroots movement seeking to untangle the web of contradictions encountered in the early days of the “pandemic,” met for the first time in Rome in September of 2021 and has since assembled in Marseilles, France, followed by the European Parliament in Brussels, with the Alliance for the Union of Romanians, a Romanian political party, hosting the most recent event in the Palace of the Parliament in Bucharest.

During the Summit, Elisabeth interviewed two of the presenters. Her notes and the embedded videos are below. Many thanks to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for uploading these videos:

The presentations by Jason Christoff and Dr. Ryan Cole impressed me so much that I decided to interview them to delve deeper into the matter.

Jason Christoff is a Canadian who runs an international reprogramming institute where students are educated on the subject of mind control, brainwashing, behavior modification, and psychological manipulation. Christoff believes that the social decay we see in our world today has only come about because key players are using this manipulative psychology against most of humanity. If we are to survive and strive in the upcoming years, he adds, all citizens must understand these processes to protect themselves from future psychological operations.

During the course of the “pandemic,” I often wondered how most people might have succumbed to the brainwashing tactics while others, like me, did not. I asked Jason Christoff for his view:

During the pandemic years, Dr. Ryan Cole became almost a household name, especially in the United States, because of his frequent testimony in the US Senate and multiple state legislatures, as well as numerous national and international conferences, sharing the science and truth about Covid, treatments, vaccinations, and medical freedom.

His presentation focused on one of the most frightening aspects of mass gene therapy (“Covid vaccines”), the uptick of cancer rates and a change in the behavior of cancers, now colloquially referred to as “turbo cancers.” He also addressed the contamination of synthetic mRNA vials with fragmented plasmid DNA from a bait-and-switch manufacturing process. As a result, he calls for additional research funding for those who have been harmed and an immediate halt of the contaminated synthetic mRNA products.

As these cases of “turbo cancers” are rising, I asked Dr. Cole whether he believed there would one day be sufficient evidence to prosecute the perpetrators in court. Here is how Dr. Cole replied:

Continue reading

It’s the Vax, Stupid!

One of the conclusions emerging from the International Crisis Summit 4 in Bucharest is that the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus actually increased the incidence of mortality due to COVID-19.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Uncut News:

It’s proven! The Covid vaccine caused the emergence of the aggressive variant of the virus

The shocking statistics clearly show that Covid mortality only increased explosively in 2021, the year of mass vaccination of the population. In addition, under pressure from the messenger RNA vaccine, the SARS-Cov-2 virus developed an extremely aggressive form, which led to an increase in mortality. The results were presented at the International Crisis Summit 4in the Romanian Parliament Palace, attended by leading medical experts from around the world.

The highest risk of dying from Covid was in 2021, when the CFR (Case Fatality Rate) was 3.48%, compared to 1.4% in 2020 and less than 1% in 2022 and 2023, when people didn’t get the vaccine. 45-50 days after the first dose of the so-called vaccine, the escalation of cases and deaths began, while in Romania the first dose was administered in the middle of the de-escalation of Covid-19, which contradicts all epidemiological principles, said Dr. Oana Mihaela Secara in her speech at the International Crisis Summit 4, held on November 18 and 19, 2023 at the Palace of the Parliament in Romania.

She pointed out that, according to the epidemiological data collected, the risk of death from Covid-19 in 2021 is reflected by the IFR (infection fatality rate), which corresponds to the CFR: “The IFR is even 3.48%, since most patients report their symptoms and get tested in order to receive six months of freedom through the green certificate.”

In addition, the Delta variant, which developed in the fall of 2021 under the pressure of the so-called vaccine, was aggressive and frightened the population with the number of deaths, this time even “Covid”, according to the Romanian doctor. In the year of the vaccination campaign, Prof. Virgil Paunescu, Vice President of the Academy of Medical Sciences, warned that if the virus is put under pressure, whether through treatments or vaccines, it will seek a way out, with the risk of generating mutations that could be more aggressive. This has already happened.

Health policy has increased mortality

Apart from the official treatment protocols with drugs that do not have a positive impact on the recovery of Covid patients, the biggest problem in 2020 and 2021 was the misguided health policies dictated by the government, says Dr. Oana Mihaela Secara. Assigning Covid patients to single-specialty hospitals, without doctors of other specialities and without medical equipment, allocating fewer places for patients in health centers and ATIs, maintaining a small number of ATI specialists and overloading them have led to a huge increase in mortality.

Continue reading