Human or Trans-Human?

The following report contains assertions by Dr. Carrie Madej that are controversial, to say the least. Some of the information in the article has been corroborated by other sources, but there are parts I have never seen elsewhere. I haven’t read the Supreme Court decision that she refers to, but a link to the PDF is provided, so I advise readers to check it out and see if it means what she says it means.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from PolitikStube:

Dr. Carrie Madej warns: Non-human gene sequences in humans are the property of the patent holder (Video)

U.S. court order — nonhuman gene sequences in humans are the property of the patent holder. So yes:

The USA decided that vaccinated people WORLDWIDE are patented under USA law; they are no longer human.

With a DNA or RNA GEN-modified vaccination mRNA vaccination, you are owned by the patent holder of the GEN-modified vaccination because you have your own genome and are no longer “human” (no natural people), but “trans-humans” are no longer human and all human rights are lost. It applies WORLDWIDE — the patents are subject to US law.

Since 2013 all GEN-modified, mRNA vaccinated persons are legally trans-human and legally identified as trans-human and receive no human rights or any other rights conferred by a state, and this applies WORLDWIDE, because the patents for the GEN-POISONIC INJECTIONS RESIDE IN THE USA, and thus the jurisdiction and the legislation.

SOURCE from US SUPREME COURT decision [PDF]

Dr. Carrie Madej joins journalist Alex Newman to discuss the trans-humanist agenda behind the COVID vaccines…

As for SARS-CoV-2, she says, “There is no Freedom of Information Act in the world that has ever produced an actual, bonafide sample of the virus. It literally doesn’t exist. We only have the code and it’s important to know.

“Nobody has the actual virus. Why is that? They never answered that. So they can’t make the normal vaccine. It is a recombinant code with a gene synthesis. That is, they slide different types of genetic material together, slide them together like a Frankenstein puzzle, and then, to fill in the missing gaps, have an artificial intelligence computer program do it for them.”

What she says is that the syringe contains various proteins, some of which are found in the human placenta and sperm, that can trigger an autoimmune response in the tissues that have these proteins.

So far, 18 sub-units of HIV1 have been found in the virus’ genetic code that cause the body to intentionally produce the HIV1 virus. “Could it give you HIV or AIDS? Nobody has the answer to that. Only time will tell; in years we will know. But you should know that there are people who tested positive for HIV after they got these vaccines… in Australia they tested positive. So this is something to be very concerned about.

Continue reading

A Flood of Globalist Multiculturalism

Catastrophic flooding took place last week in several regions of western Germany. The image below is from an appeal for help for flood victims that appeared in the tabloid Bild. Note the ethnicity of the poor helpless “German” family.

Hellequin GB has translated two pieces about the floods. From PolitikStube:

Is that a German family who lost everything in the flood? BILD should be ashamed

The comments speak for themselves:

Anabel Schunke: The comments below the picture speak volumes. People want to show solidarity. But with their compatriots. They want it to be about the Germans too. And that’s legitimate. For years it was about “we” helping, that “we” had to take in refugees. Why aren’t Heinz and Hilde shown now, who may also have lost their belongings and for whom their house has always been their home? Why do German victims never have a face in the media?

Sorry, you probably achieve the opposite in this way. Of course, I feel sorry for all the victims of the catastrophe, but you usually feel more sympathy and empathy for people to whom you feel culturally close. Who else should I identify with in this country and show solidarity if we Germans are never given a face in the media? When it’s always about others?

A few more comments without attribution:

  • So those in the Eifel looked different
  • Are we now getting support from other countries like we helped them back then?
  • I haven’t seen any of them on TV
  • Perfect picture where is the German family who have lost their house and their belongings.
  • All that’s missing is the rainbow
  • Olaf look, there it is, the average Eifel family. Incomprehensible
  • live in the disaster area and find the picture not appropriate many German families are badly affected by the flood these people should be in the first place
  • Somehow something is wrong with the photo. Where are the German citizens in the picture? The flood was in Germany, wasn’t it ?!?!
  • Incomprehensible! A mockery for the German families who have lost their homes! And again society is massively divided
  • Because of the photo I don’t give a cent because these people deserve 0%
  • Dear Bild, what does this picture have to do with us Germans? Do you not have a picture of victims who are also directly affected? That irritates me and I think it’s completely past the topic. But that also shows what you think of us, namely nothing! I am not affected myself, but I will help my compatriots. That’s what I call solidarity with compatriots, you nincompoops.

Also from PolitikStube, the spending priorities of the German government during the time of the floods:

Continue reading

Sturm und Drang

The sky has darkened, and a loud and ominous rumbling may be heard coming from the northwest of Schloss Bodissey. The forecast is predicting severe thunderstorms in this part of the Commonwealth this afternoon.

The electric grid in my area has an annoying habit of going down for extended periods under such circumstances. So, if you don’t hear from me for a while, and your comments don’t get approved, you’ll know why. All I can do is wait it out.

In the meantime, I suggest that you look for news on two import topics: (1) the ongoing unrest in South Africa, and (2) the immigration crisis in Lithuania. They are far more interesting and important than whatever fatuity Joe Biden may have uttered today, or the way Jen Psaki has pstriven to pspin it.

I recommend staying away from the American news — for the moment anyway. It is full of sound and fury, but signifies nothing.

Mutti: All Good Patriotic Germans Will Get the Vax

In the following excerpts from a Ruptly clip, German Chancellor Angela Merkel says she will not force Germans to get the Corona “vaccine”, but she will twist their arms really, really hard.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

“No Freedom Without Vaccination”

Hellequin GB has translated an article from SWR (Südwestrundfunk) about a really swell German dude named Dr. Peter Heinz (at left in the graphic below).

Dr. Heinz is the Chairman of the Rhineland-Palatinate Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The translator suggests that he bears a certain family resemblance to the fellow on the right, the late Heinrich Himmler, former head of the Schutzstaffel in the Third Reich. You decide.

“No Freedom Without Vaccination”

State health insurance chief demands that unvaccinated people no longer be allowed to travel

The chairman of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in Rhineland-Palatinate, Peter Heinz, calls for massive restrictions on freedom for unvaccinated people. He refuses to call for a compulsory vaccination.

“The non-vaccinated do not have the freedom to take off their masks. They are not allowed to go to the stadium, the swimming pool or the supermarket without a mask. And the unvaccinated and those with just a simple vaccination are no longer allowed to go on vacation,” said Heinz in the Rhein-Zeitung.

“Even with a negative test, no vacation”

In his opinion, even with a negative test, unvaccinated people should not go on vacation: “A negative test does not protect. For example, anyone who goes to an island with a negative PCR test may very well be infected there, go home, and become a virus carrier.”

“No freedom without vaccination”

“Anyone who gives freedom to the unvaccinated is wasting the chance to reach everyone with the vaccination,” said Heinz. You have to make it clear to people: “Without vaccination there is no freedom. Without this pressure, we will not convince people.” Unvaccinated people are a danger to society and should therefore not be given the same freedoms as vaccinated people.

Heinz considers rewards for vaccination to be “absurd”. However, he rejects compulsory vaccination as “paternalism”. Giving freedom only to vaccinated people is not a hidden obligation to vaccinate, “but an inevitable conclusion from a pandemic situation.”

So Who’s a Covidiot Now?

Oskar Lafontaine is a German politician and the former leader of the Social Democrats. As far as I can tell he is no right-wing extremist. So what’s he doing saying such doubleplus ungood things about the Coronamadness?

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from PolitikStube:

Oskar Lafontaine: “The word Covidioten is now falling back on those who invented it”

Since last year, dissidents and critics of the measures have been repeatedly referred to as “Covidiotes”. The creation of the word “Covidioten” was created by SPD co-leader Saskia Esken on the occasion of the first major demonstration on August 1, 2020 against the Federal Government’s Corona requirements in Berlin. For the most part, the demonstrators had no masks on and didn’t play along with the distancing rule.

In view of the scare tactics from politics and the media, the measures prescribed, contaminated masks, unsuitable PCR tests, the daily water level report of the incidence values and the quickly approved vaccines along with negative effects, more and more citizens are now asking: Who are the “Covidiotes” in reality?

Oskar Lafontaine sums it up in a comment:

The word Covidioten is now falling back on those who invented it to belittle others. Although more and more people are vaccinated (57 percent have the first vaccination and 40 percent already have full vaccination protection), Covid howling buoys — Karl Lauterbach in the foreground — use the delta variant to warn again and create horror scenarios. It is becoming more and more evident that the so-called experts, arm in arm with the pharmaceutical industry, paint the devil on the wall in order to vaccinate as many people as possible with the vaccines with “conditional marketing authorization” and to prepare for the next lockdown. The “experts” gradually lose their credibility.

Riding around on incidences without specifying the number of tests performed has always been charlatanism from a scientific point of view. On closer inspection, the warnings of overcrowded intensive care units turn out to be interest-driven lies, as the Federal Audit Office has established. And even the statistics of corona deaths and the conclusions drawn from them are falling into the twilight.

Jens Berger has presented the errors of the Corona policy in detail in his new “Black Book Corona”, which made it onto the customer lists. A compliment to the paediatricians and the members of the Standing Vaccination Commission, who have so far steadfastly refused to advocate the vaccination of children, despite the fact that the pharmaceutical lobby is putting a lot of pressure on its henchmen. The lockdown has caused more harm and suffering to the children than a Covid infection ever could.

The swear word Covidioten falls back more and more on those who seize every opportunity to issue self-important warnings and drive people crazy with unsupported scientific claims.

Steal Me Away With an Echo

It looks like another “pandemic” is in the works: the Delta Variant is the new COVID monster that we’re supposed to be deathly afraid of. I’m anticipating another lockdown in the fall, so I’ve decided to engage in a few enjoyable activities this summer while I still can.

I’m heading off on a little getaway to the mountains, where the air is cool and fresh breezes blow, and where I’ll be meeting up with friends and family. Unfortunately, it looks like the hurricane weather is going to be reaching its tendrils all the way up there, so I may be stuck indoors most of the time.

I’ll be gone for two nights; there will be no news feed tonight and tomorrow. If all goes well, there will be one on Friday night.

In the meantime, here’s an exercise for my British readers. Today is the sixteenth anniversary of the 7/7 terrorist bombings on London transport. Are there any public observances of the occasion in the UK? Are people talking about it among themselves? Or is it all gone and forgotten?

You can leave your responses in the comments, and I’ll moderate them when I get home.

I’ll see you later, boys and girls. And persons of indeterminate or undefined gender.

Eric Clapton Discusses the Vax and the Narrative


I’ve been a fan of Eric Clapton since Cream recorded the song “Badge”* in (roughly) 1969. I consider him one of the four all-time great electric guitarists (the other three being Jimi Hendrix, Jerry Garcia, and Bill Nelson).

I’ve never been very interested in biographies of or interviews with celebrities, so I had no real acquaintance with Mr. Clapton’s personality and character until I watched the interview below, which was conducted and published by Oracle Films. He seems like a really nice guy, and a man of integrity, especially considering his position in the lofty empyrean of rock music celebrity.

However, his amiable personality did him no good when he ran up against the Narrative concerning COVID-19 and the “vaccine”. His interest in alternative therapies for the disease and his public mention of the adverse effects of the experimental mRNA treatment (which he experienced personally) put him beyond the pale of polite discourse and invited his cancellation from the pantheon of Guitar Gods. He and Van Morrison became the Evil Twins of the music world, and are now reviled by the bien pensants who control the Narrative and decide who is allowed to prosper and who gets squashed.

I recommend watching the entire interview:

Hat tip: Arutz Sheva

*   Yes, I know George Harrison co-wrote the song with Clapton.

German Geezers Will Get Boosters

It seems that Germans who are elderly and/or sickly, and who managed to survive both COVID-19 and “vaccination”, will require a booster shot just to make sure.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from PolitikStube:

The weakest are in the cross-hairs again

Spahn: Prepare possible booster vaccinations for people in need of care

Even before the start of vaccination, Federal Minister of Health Jens Spahn had his sights set on the elderly and the sick, who should get their turn first as guinea pigs, so to speak, i.e. those who already have a lot of suffering or severe ailments, so that the sometimes serious side effects of the administration of the vaccine can be blamed on the previous illness or even death can be swept under the carpet.

Spahn’s Corona Plan Agenda program is not just about vaccinating. Booster vaccinations are also on the agenda, and people in need of care should again have the honor, although unenlightened and unknowingly, to be the first to take part in the procedure in order to weaken them even further, to endanger or… thoughts are free.

Epoch Times: Federal Minister of Health Jens Spahn (CDU) said on Thursday that possible booster vaccinations for people in need of treatment in care facilities have already been “mentally” prepared. “I am expecting recommendations from the Standing Vaccination Commission soon, which concerns immunosuppressed people and the need for a booster vaccination,” said Spahn.

Stiko [Ständige Impfkommission, Standing Committee on Vaccination] boss Mertens did not want to interfere in the actual preparation. “I currently don’t know exactly what the plans are, and it’s not our Stiko task, either,” said the committee chairman. At the moment, Stiko does not need any “signals” from the federal government, but rather data “as always”. “Discussions about necessary measures will take place,” said Mertens.

Microbiology is a Risky Business

A few days ago I posted MissPiggy’s timeline of events related to SARS, gain-of-function research, the Wuhan Coronavirus, and the “vaccines”.

Hellequin GB left a comment in which he suggested additional avenues of research:

Suspicious deaths

The sudden and suspicious deaths of eleven of the world’s leading microbiologists.

Who they were:

1.   Nov. 12, 2001   Benito Que was said to have been beaten in a Miami parking lot and died later.
2.   Nov. 16, 2001   Don C. Wiley went missing. Was found Dec. 20. Investigators said he got dizzy on a Memphis bridge and fell to his death in a river.
3.   Nov. 21, 2001   Vladimir Pasechnik, former high-level Russian microbiologist who defected in 1989 to the U.K. apparently died from a stroke.
4.   Dec. 10, 2001   Robert M. Schwartz was stabbed to death in Leesburg, Va. Three Satanists have been arrested.
5.   Dec. 14, 2001   Nguyen Van Set died in an airlock filled with nitrogen in his lab in Geelong, Australia.
6.   Feb. 9, 2002   Victor Korshunov had his head bashed in near his home in Moscow.
7.   Feb. 14, 2002   Ian Langford was found partially naked and wedged under a chair in Norwich, England.
8. & 9.   Feb. 28, 2002   San Francisco resident Tanya Holzmayer was killed by a microbiologist colleague, Guyang Huang, who shot her as she took delivery of a pizza and then apparently shot himself.
10.   Mar. 24, 2002   David Wynn-Williams died in a road accident near his home in Cambridge, England.
11.   Mar. 25, 2002   Steven Mostow of the Colorado Health Sciences Centre, killed in a plane he was flying near Denver.
 

Our longtime reader and commenter Acuara sent this note after reading Hellequin’s comment:

I read the timeline and the list of the deaths of the microbiologists that preceded the timeline. My somewhat suspicious sense caught a whiff of something. May I politely request that you contact Hellequin, Gentleman Bastard, and request a compendium of the articles, theses, and/or dissertations that were written by the people that Gentleman Bastard listed.

My sense of things is that these people who died would have provided a credible challenge to what Messrs. Fauci, Gates, et al were planning to proceed with. We know from their increasingly defensive posture that they are running scared while trying to regroup. I would think that the Klieg Light of Public Awareness would result in the lot of them swinging from the gallows as they deserve, not that I am looking for vengeance as that is the Lord’s property, but rather and end to this chicanery and a return to responsible and ethical governance.

I passed Acuara’s message on to Hellequin, who applied himself to the task requested. He sent the list below, with an introductory note:

I think to go through all of these papers and understand the nitty-gritty of this, we need someone who can actually “READ” them, and not just the words. Because I don’t know enough to correlate this and connect the dots here, if there actually are any dots to connect in the end.

A list of the eleven with links to scholarly writings:

Continue reading

COVID Beware: We’ve Got Babies and We’re Not Afraid to Use Them!

I reported a few days ago on the pro-vax propaganda being pushed by the Virginia Department of Health. Below is the latest example, scanned from a half-page ad in a local paper:

The message in this one isn’t even subliminal: If you want to hold your grandchild, you have to get the vax. Never mind the fact that an infant has a less than 0.01% chance of catching COVID, and even less chance of becoming seriously ill from it if he does catch it — you gotta do it! Because, like, we all want to stay SAFE!

Looking at this photo, I thought about the models used for it. Did the ersatz grandma get the jab before she held the baby from Central Casting? If so, was she shedding spike proteins all over poor little Cuthbert’s face?

Och, the puir wee bairns!

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

I went to the retinal specialist’s office today to get a periodic injection in my left eye to treat macular degeneration. It has slowed me down somewhat, but all in all, I’m doing surprisingly well. They didn’t dilate my pupils today (with these modern scanners they don’t have to), so my right eye is functioning normally. And, amazingly, I don’t have the Dancing Bubble in my left eye this time, which I almost always get. When I do, it makes me miserable for hours afterwards, but not tonight.

So life is good.

As a result, I should be able to crank out one or two more posts before the news feed. Stay tuned.

SARS, Gain of Function, COVID, and the Vax: A Timeline

MissPiggy compiled the following timeline for our skype group. I’m not going to tell you what to think about all this; you can easily draw your own conclusions.

2002

November: University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill (UNC) researcher Ralph Baric publishes a “breakthrough work” in gain-of-function research (studies that alter pathogens to make them more transmissible or deadly), describing the creation of a synthetic clone of a natural mouse coronavirus.

November: China’s Guangdong province reports the first case of “atypical pneumonia” (later labeled as SARS).

2003

October 28: A paper by the Baric research group at UNC describes their synthetic recreation of the “previously undescribed” SARS coronavirus. (Writing in 2020, a scientist states, “The speed of the Baric group illustrates how quickly a qualified team of virologists can create a synthetic clone from a natural virus, and therefore make genetic modifications to it. Moreover, that was back in 2003. Today, a qualified laboratory can repeat those steps in a matter of weeks.”)

2011

December 30: Dr. Fauci promotes gain-of-function research on bird flu viruses, arguing that the research is worth the risk. The risks worry other “seasoned researchers.”

2012

Christine Grady, wife of Anthony Fauci since 1985, becomes head of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, opening up the possibility of numerous conflicts of interest concerning vaccines, HIV and COVID-19. Grady previously served in the Department of Bioethics as an investigator (2004-2012), senior staff bioethicist (1996-2004) and head of the Section on Human Subjects Research (1998-2014). Like her husband, Grady has made HIV a central career focus, including stints on the Scientific Advisory Board of the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (which Fauci helped launch), as a paid consultant for the WHO and UNAIDS and, in 1987-1988, as a staffer for President Reagan’s Commission on the HIV Epidemic. Grady’s 1995 book is titled The Search for an AIDS Vaccine. Fauci, who became NIAID director in 1984 under Reagan, holds a number of HIV vaccine-related patents.

April 20: Baylor College researchers publish their evaluation of four vaccine candidates for SARS, concluding that “Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.”

May: The 194 Member States of the World Health Assembly endorse the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP), led by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in collaboration with NIAID, WHO, Gavi, UNICEF and others. Dr. Fauci is one of five members on the GVAP’s Leadership Council.

October: Fauci writes article in the American Society for Microbiology saying “gain of function” benefits outweigh the risks.

2013

May 7: Email from Kary Mullis to the widow of boxer Tommy Morrison, whose career and life were destroyed by an “HIV test,” and who litigated ferociously for years, against test manufacturers. Dr. Mullis wrote on May 7, 2013:

“PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment.”

“If things were done right, ‘infection’ would be a far cry from a positive PCR test.”

“PCR is a needle in a haystack technology that can be extremely misleading in the diagnosis of infectious diseases.”

2014

Merieux (former employer of Moderna CEO) is instrumental in creating high-security P4 Lab that opened in Wuhan in 2014.

Dr. Deborah Birx takes the helm of PEPFAR (the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief), which Dr. Fauci helped launch (in 2003) and which benefits from generous Gates Foundation support. Birx and Fauci are long-time allies, having worked together during the early years of AIDS and sharing overlapping career paths.

October 7: National Institutes of Health (NIH) director Francis Collins announces a “new phase of cooperation” between NIH and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, including partnering for vaccine development.

October 17: U.S. funding of SARS to create a biological weapon is paused due to the extreme risk of a pandemic. However, the pause allows agencies within the U.S. government to continue funding if they determined “the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national security.”

Continue reading

A Midsummer Daydream

Dymphna died just four days before the thirty-ninth anniversary of the celebration of our marriage. The photo at the top of this post was taken forty-one years ago today, on June 21, 1980 (our actual marriage had taken place the previous fall at the county courthouse). After the service we held a reception for relatives and friends back at our house, which is now known as Schloss Bodissey.

I’ve blurred out the face of my good friend in the background who officiated at our little service, and cropped off the maid of honor on my left and the best man on Dymphna’s right.

My mother had given Dymphna her own mother’s wedding ring, and I’m wearing my late father’s wedding ring.

1980 — just the other day!

The Biologic Urge to Readjust the Map of Europe

In the two years since Dymphna died I have dedicated myself to putting my affairs in order, so that the future Baron won’t have too hard a time when I shuffle off this mortal coil and go to claim my 72 virgins. One of the most difficult and time-consuming tasks has been to clean out, cull, and reorganize the material in the filing cabinets here at Schloss Bodissey. I have to pull out all the papers and scrutinize them before deciding whether to keep them or not. In the process I have come across a number of delightful surprises, plus a few mysteries.

An example of the latter is a hand-written chart (to be discussed in detail below). It’s in pencil, in my handwriting (and very small — you can tell my eyes were still working), written on the back of a computer printout that dates it to 1990. It’s basically a compendium of territorial changes in Europe between 1916 and 1945.


(Click to enlarge)

The big mystery is: why the heck did I put the thing together? It was written fourteen years before we started blogging. The future Baron was too small at that point for the document to have been one my lesson plans for him. The material in it closely tracks what I had to absorb to take my A-levels (and special papers) in European history. But it was written twenty years after I took my exams, so I couldn’t possibly have been regurgitating it from memory. I can tell I consulted the Harvard Encyclopedia of World History (a 1948 edition inherited from my father that is now held together by duct tape. It is one of the most treasured resources in my reference library, second only to the Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology). Alas, I can no longer read it without a magnifying glass, so I won’t be checking any of the dates and facts on my chart to make sure they’re right.

For weeks I puzzled over the document, trying to figure out why I compiled it. My best guess is that Dymphna had been reading something — possibly The Guns of August by Barbara Tuchman — and wanted to know about the territorial adjustments made in the map of Europe by the Treaty of Versailles and others that followed in the wake of the Great War. She knew I was well-versed in modern European history, so she must have asked me if I would put something together that would summarize it for her. I would have been delighted by her request, because I love to do that sort of thing — or used to, when my eyes still functioned normally.

The chart is a useful resource, so I took the trouble to transcribe it as well as I could. Doing so brought back memories of all that old A-level material. Vojvodina! I hadn’t thought about that name in a while. And some of the other names — Serbia, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Moldavia, etc. — are well-known now, because they’re sovereign states, but they weren’t in 1990; they were still socialist republics within one or the other of the communist superstates.

I can still remember a few more names that didn’t make it to the chart — the Sanjak of Novi Bazar, for example, or Eastern Rumelia.

The map of Europe was drastically reorganized after 1917 (after the Bolshevik Revolution, that is) and then even more so after 1918 in a series of treaties that divvied up the territory of the collapsed empires. Adolf Hitler did his part to rearrange the map even further, and then major revisions took place after the end of World War Two until 1946 or so. After that everything was frozen in place by the Cold War for the next 45 years. Then suddenly in the 1990s you started to see names in the newspaper that hadn’t been there since the 1930s — Montenegro, for instance, and Estonia. And things are still in flux now — who knows what the map of Europe will look like after the EU finally collapses?

Here’s my transcription of the document. I tried to put it in date order as far as possible. I expanded abbreviations when I was sure what they meant; otherwise I left them as-is:

Continue reading