Category Archives: Islamic Atrocities

Mohamed the Butcher Becomes Mohamed the Rapist

Posted on by
14

A number of years ago, after reading so many stories about rapes and bestiality by Muslim men, I said sardonically to Dymphna: “Muslim men will rape anything that has a hole, and if it doesn’t have one, they’ll cut it a new one — that’s why they all carry knives.”

In the intervening years what began as a sick joke morphed into depressing reality as I read more and more about the rapin’-’n’-gropin’ proclivities of Islamic males. For a Muslim man the principal method of interaction with objects in his environment seems to be to rape them — women, girls, men, boys, infants, corpses, donkeys, goats, swans, and many other species too numerous to mention.

The story below from Philosophia Perennis is a case in point: a Muslim man in Germany took revenge on his wife’s ex-boyfriend — a fellow Muslim — by raping him, with the help of a couple of buddies.

By the way — this case has a Mohammed Coefficient of 100%

Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation:

Trial in Görlitz: Mohamed A. allegedly raped the ex-boyfriend of his current partner

by David Berger
November 30th, 2019

Out of jealousy, a 33-year-old Tunisian is said to have brutally raped his present wife’s ex-boyfriend, the 35-year-old Pakistani Saif U. in Görlitz with the help of two other Arabs. “Mohamed locked the door from the inside. Then two more Arabs came along, beat me and kicked me, pressed me to the ground.” Then the 35-year-old Pakistani Saif U. was undressed and raped. Saif gave his testimony yesterday in tears before a court in Dresden.

Mohamed the butcher comes from Tunisia

And the prosecution seems to be certain that this description is correct, even if the Tunisian perpetrator Mohamed A. (33, butcher), who is now on trial, continues to deny the crime. Mohamed A. had already been sentenced in the summer to 3 years and 9 months imprisonment for raping the cook Saif U. in Görlitz. The reason: The victim had once been together with his present wife Anita (28). Mohamed A. was obsessed with the idea that Saif U. had contacted her again to take her away from him. Due to procedural errors, the Federal Supreme Court overturned the verdict, and the trial is now taking place again.

What do the “Fck AfD” T-shirt wearers have to do with the rapist Arab?

Male rape is much more common than generally assumed. And it also has serious consequences, especially if the men have a migration background in which passive anal intercourse (“treating him like a woman”) is considered degrading for a man: “A prejudice that men who have been raped are less traumatised than women is absolutely wrong, on the contrary. Studies show that the long-term effects of rape, whether male or female, usually have serious consequences for life. In addition, men are exposed to greater social stigmatisation, leading to even greater psychological damage for male rape victims.” (according to Wikipedia) Male rape by men is then understood as revenge or simply as violent domination. The now widespread German slogan “Fck xxx (Nazis, AfD, etc.)” remains attached to this anarchistic, misogynistic paradigm.

“And Take Their Wives as War Booty”

Posted on by
9

Michael Copeland’s latest essay concerns slavery, especially sex slavery, under Islam, and the violence mandated to enforce it.

“And Take Their Wives as War Booty”

by Michael Copeland

“Bomb Denmark, so we can invade their country, and take their wives as war booty,” shouted a demonstrator hoarsely in London. He was recorded on a mobile, and the clip can be seen on the internet. Perhaps, just a little, he was performing for the camera: it has been known. How does that shout come across to us? Bombast? A revealing fantasy? A theatrical insult? Some sort of Old Testament curse? Most English hearers would react in such a way, not prepared to give it any more serious value, and just regard the shouter as out of touch with modern life.

Here is the surprise: he meant it. Though angry and excited, and staging a performance, he was deadly serious. The occasion was one of those organized rent-a-mob Islamic protests where the demonstrators obey instructions from the mosque to go out and cause a loud and aggressive disturbance, a “Day of Rage”. Once instructed, it becomes the “right” thing to do. As a result they would be beaten up if they did not do it. “Commanding the Right and Forbidding the Wrong,” in the Manual of Islamic Law, specifies that to enforce the “right” the Muslim is entitled to employ “threatening and intimidation” (q5.7). The next step is “directly hit or kick the person” (q5.8), after which comes “the armed assistance of others” (q5.9). All that violence is absolutely fine under Sharia, Islamic law, though it violates criminal law, as does so much else in Sharia. That “swift Islamic manner”, as Anjem Choudary describes it, is how Islamic law is enforced. Force is Islam’s prevailing theme:

“Does Islam, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword, to submit? Yes!”

wrote Osama bin Laden. The ancient scholar Ibn Khaldun decreed centuries ago:

“… holy war is a religious duty, … [to] convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force.”

That is, of course, hardly a choice: it is compulsion. The Woolwich killer explained:

“We are forced by the Koran….”

Islam is submission to force, hence the sword emblem on the flag of Saudi Arabia and the badge of the Muslim Brotherhood. The Saracen of history is well known for his scimitar, which was no mere emblem: it was put to much use. Currently news item after news item from Syria’s civil war, many with images too gory to show on main channel bulletins, reveal Islam’s obsession with force. There is a need in the West to tune in, or try to tune in, to Islam’s unchanged seventh-century tribal mindset of force.

The idea of “wives as war booty” is foreign to Europeans, not something that is part of Western culture, but more like something from the Old Testament, from the harsh cultures of the Near East. It was not the Old Testament, however, that the shouter was quoting: he is a Muslim, after all, and Islam does not permit Bibles anywhere in their teaching. In certain Muslim states, such as Kyrgyzstan and Saudi Arabia, merely to possess one is a criminal offence: no “diversity” there. It is the Koran that is the source: it has a whole chapter entitled “Spoils of War”. Wives as war booty, part of desert tribal life, have remained a continuing feature of Islam from its seventh-century origins to this day:

“Slavery is a part of Islam. Slavery is part of jihad, and jihad will remain as long there is Islam”,

says Sheikh Saleh Al-Fawzan, eminent Saudi scholar of Islam. The Manual of Islamic Law (o9.13) makes it clear:

Continue reading →

Brad Johnson on the Bagging of Baghdadi

Posted on by
1

[The above graphic doesn’t really have anything to do with this post. I just thought it was a hoot, and felt compelled to post it.]

Well, it seems that this time Schrödinger’s Caliph is really most sincerely dead. In the following interview, the retired CIA station chief Brad Johnson discusses the killing of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi from an intelligence perspective.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for conducting the interview and uploading the video:


Video link

Hat tip for the graphic: MissPiggy.

A Hatchet Job in Limburg

Posted on by
4

The following essay by Oliver Flesch was published by 1984 Magazin on Friday after the vehicle-and-hatchet murder in Limburg. Many thanks to Oz-Rita for the translation:

Limburg: Victim wanted to leave her Tunisian husband

Leaving a Muslim man is a bit like playing Russian roulette. Except that in Russian roulette the chances are higher that it will turn out well.

by Oliver Flesch

Limburg — Once again a woman lost her life in the name of honour. The victim (31) had hidden from her husband in a women’s shelter. Leaving a Muslim man is a bit like playing Russian roulette. Except that in Russian roulette the chances are higher that it will turn out well.

For the mother of two children, any help came too late. Her husband had almost cut her head from her torso with an ax and a butcher’s knife, as BILD learned from investigators.

Oh, and while we are at BILD: Never before in the history of murderous migrants has there been a greater dance on eggshells. Five times in the same article BILD gave the alleged perpetrator a different description. Here is the chronology of helplessness:

1.   A German,
2.   A German with a migration background,
3.   A German,
4.   A man,
5.   A suspect born in Germany as the son of Tunisian immigrants.
 

There are people who think that the origin of the perpetrators is not important. Oh, yes — it is. We have to name the problem. We must be allowed to say that people from certain cultures act more violently than those from others.

Foreigners are suspects in 42 percent of violent crimes. In Hamburg prisons the proportion of foreigners is 61 percent. 42 percent and 61 percent who have no German citizenship; Germans with a migration background are to be added on top of that. Violence committed by asylum seekers who have gone underground (around 500,000) is not included, so we have to add to this.

We are powerless against honour killings. Mindsets could be changed, but this is not what the families want. Many Muslim boys are brought up as they have been for centuries. In their world it does not happen that a woman leaves her husband. How would he look then, in front of his friends whom he calls his brothers? What a humiliation! He would rather kill her there, so that nobody else will get her, either, and his brothers will celebrate him as a hero.

That is how they think. We cannot make any progress with brochures that say that women are equal in Germany.

It is a struggle that we cannot win. We could keep it in check a little by consistent deportation, but deportations are simply not in fashion at the moment.

That is why we will soon meet again in this theatre. Same genre, only the protagonists will have different names.

Tea and Treachery

Posted on by
9

Tabitha Korol’s latest essay concerns the big “T” — which does not necessarily stand for Tariq Ramadan…

Tea and Treachery

by Tabitha Korol

Teas take on different significance in different cultures, but a TeaTime hosted by the Muslim Brotherhood members resembles no other. It is a time to be wary of the dualism of Islam and the gathering’s true purpose.

The modest event was publicized as TeaTime in a local church. It would not be a four-o’clock, English-style social occasion, complete with porcelain tea service and petit fours; or Japanese ceremony symbolizing peace, harmony and happiness; or Chinese ritual of peace, quiet, enjoyment and truth. Perhaps the focus would not be on the beverage at all but another T. The initial T. T as in Taqiyyah, whose meaning in Arabic is the practice of concealing one’s belief (more accurately known as duplicity) and foregoing ordinary religious duties in order to make Islam supreme. It is a concept and reality that must be borne in mind when reading or listening to the words of Muslims. It provides the opportunity for the affable advance guard to sell you an appealing story about a warmonger, a mass murderer, so that we may continue to welcome the 1.6 billion adherents into the West, our country, and into our lives, and fundamentally and forever change what we have.

T might also refer to the visiting Taskforce and its Tactic, as well as Theocracy, Tyranny, Treachery, Territorialism, Thought control, Takeover and Theirs, all combined into a system by which they seize dominance of land and people through the centuries, as they have come to Threaten and dominate in the Middle East and Africa; proceeding in the UK, mainland Europe, Scandinavia, and progressing in the Americas and Oceania.

Their informational flyers would be displayed during the session, including one titled, “What they say about the Prophet Muhammad,” published by ICNA — Islamic Circle of North America, an offshoot of the Muslim Students Association (MSA), which is itself an affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) — to complement the conversation at this Islamic outreach program. The MB is a religiopolitical organization, founded in 1928 to carry on the work of Muhammad, to advocate the application of Islamic law (sharia) in all aspects of society — and in every society on the globe. This is Hijra, conquest by population, and this is why they’re here.

This T-time would not be a Muslim outreach for socialization and assimilation, to engage their Christian neighbors and ease the adjustment of the incoming migrants into American life. They have not come to learn, because they already know far more about us than we know about them, their ideology and their purpose. They have come to leave their spiritual mark on our Territory, on the church itself, because, according to Muhammad, now that they have set foot on this place, it is Theirs. There will be no need for war and bloodshed if they can convince these church folks that their religions are similar, that they believe in the same god, and that these kafirs (non-Muslims) will eventually make a peaceful Transition to worship Allah. A 2017 study revealed that Islam is the fastest-growing religion, primarily due to the young age and high fertility rate of Muslims, and conversion must be maintained to equal the rate of apostasy — desertion of the faith — which carries the penalty of death.

When the Target country is too daunting for military conquest, a peaceful stealth operation may be employed to disable a population. In Leo Hohmann’s Stealth Invasion, the author reminds us that Muhammad’s unarmed warriors (men, women and children), come as legal refugees on air-conditioned planes, as legal guest workers, legal green-card holders, legal students, legal entrepreneurs, and legal professors and preachers. They will implement secret trade deals and mass immigration policies that will inevitably erode national sovereignty, divide national populations against each other, and cause civil strife, as well as inflict small increments of pressure for accommodation as we slowly adjust our lives to comply and adapt.

Continue reading →

A Mujahid, a Knife, and a Packed Railway Station

Posted on by
Reply

Just over a year ago a young Afghan culture-enricher went on a stabbing rampage in Amsterdam Central Station, seriously wounding two American tourists. Thanks to two policemen who did their jobs promptly, competently, and courageously, the perpetrator was shot and incapacitated before he could stab anyone else.

The following video tells the story of what happened that day at the station. The policemen (suitably anonymized) describe their actions, and there are stills and brief clips of the takedown of the mujahid, but the slow-motion sequences are re-enactments.

Many thanks to C for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:


Video link

Video transcript:

Continue reading →

More on the Knife Jihad in Villeurbanne

Posted on by
3

As I reported last weekend, yet another mentally disturbed culture-enricher went on a murderous rampage while invoking the name of someone called Allah. This time it was with a knife in Villeurbanne, a suburb of Lyon, and the alleged perpetrator (now in custody) is an Afghan.

Below is an update about the incident from the state prosecutor in Lyon. Many thanks to Ava Lon for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:


Video link

Video transcript:

Continue reading →

Knife Jihad in Villeurbanne

Posted on by
3

A knife-wielding mujahid went on a rampage today in Villeurbanne, a suburb of the French city of Lyon. At least one person was killed, and a number of others were wounded. Concerning the assailant’s motive, media reports on the incident give no indication of any Islamic component, mentioning only that the fellow was evidently mentally disturbed.

The two videos below show two very different views of what happened in Villeurbanne. Many thanks to Ava Lon for the translations, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling.

The first video is a news report from the mainstream media in France. There is no indication of motive, cultural enrichment, or jihad:


Video link

In the second video, the situation becomes clearer: the mujahid is checking each victim to make sure he or she is not a Muslim. In this case, he ascertains that his interlocutor is a Muslim: not only does he leave the fellow unmolested, but the two men exchange high-fives:


Video link

Video transcript #1:

Continue reading →

Brexit Compels Somali Family to Come to the Netherlands

Posted on by
1

Many thanks to FouseSquawk for translating this article from De Dagelijkse Standaard:

Judge rules: Somali “Brexit-returnees”

Somali family gets house

A Somali-Dutch family has “fled” from Birmingham. According to the court in Utrecht, they must immediately receive a house. Fortunately the new, gas-free residences are unaffordable and unpurchased, so they can immediately move into these expensive properties.

Apparently, even more — as many as 25,000 — Somalis want to make the crossing to our little country. This way it will be pleasantly busy on the already tight housing market. Various ministries have even run a campaign to combat the flow of ‘refugees’. It is no problem if we have courts that will place these people directly in homes. This signal is there is still a license come here. The British must be happy, I suppose.

The Somalis were already here in the Netherlands in the 1990s, but they made the choice to move to England. In England they could live in their own enclaves, something that the Netherlands tried to prevent. Various municipalities refused to offer housing to the family that arrived here. This is because they would be ‘homeless due to their own fault’. What it comes down to is that they didn’t actually think about the crossing. They have left an excellent — and safe — residential area to be able to benefit more here. According to various municipalities, this is not how it works.

But the judge thought differently. All the trouble from our government, and then the court decides to announce permission for immigration.

“They get signals that there were problems, so we have sent them a message in Somali that there is no reason for panic. We have told them that for them nothing has changed after Brexit. They are fine there.”

This time the government had good intentions, but the court decision did the opposite. We shall see if more now come, surely with the fear of Brexit in mind.

— Geert Wilders: Sure, first 50,000 homes for fortune-seekers, and now they go to Somalis. Our own people last.

Killing Someone Who Deserves to Die

Posted on by
5

The following essay by Michael Copeland was originally posted at LibertyGB.

Killing Someone Who Deserves to Die

by Michael Copeland

[The scene, pixellated, outside the supermarket at Prien, Bavaria, Germany (Daily Mail)]

[Fatima S., murdered outside the supermarket]

[See The Daily Mail for the photos]

Another day, another stabbing: Europe today.

The Afghan mother Fatima S. was just leaving the supermarket in Prien, Germany, with her children in April this year. Another Afghan, who had been waiting on a bench opposite, rose up and attacked her, shouting that she had to die for leaving Islam. He stabbed her in the head and then slit her throat as her cries were heard for hundreds of feet around. A horrified eye-witness said:

“It was bad. A brave citizen tried to intervene and save the woman, everything was full of blood. It was inconceivably terrible.”

Brave shoppers overpowered him. Police were called, and he was detained.

Fatima S. had left Islam. As a result she had to be killed. This is commanded in Sharia, the body of rules which define Islam. Leaving Islam is “the ugliest form of unbelief (kufr) and the worst” (Manual of Islamic Law, Reliance of the Traveller, o8). All four of the main schools of Islamic jurisprudence agree that leaving Islam — apostasy — brings death.

In Sharia, “since it is killing someone who deserves to die”, there is no penalty for killing an apostate (Manual of Islamic Law, Reliance of the Traveller, o8.4). Anyone may freely commit such a murder: it is part of Islam’s authorised vigilante killing system. Every brother doubles up as executioner. The victim had left Islam while in Afghanistan. She fled that country in 2011 because of the murder that awaited her there, and obtained asylum in Germany. Her killer was known to her, and had sought her out, arriving in Germany in 2013.

Unfortunately, we Europeans are not acquainted with these rules: the attacker was initially detained in a psychiatric hospital. Authorities are not yet familiar with Sharia, but we all need to give it some attention. This is because Islam’s mission is to impose Sharia on all the world, in a Global Caliphate, by force if needed. Osama bin Laden explained, but no-one took any notice:

Continue reading →

Two From Stuttgart

Posted on by
2

As you all know by now, a German-Kazakh was recently murdered with a sword in Stuttgart by a “Palestinian” pretending to be a Syrian. Below are two videos with more news about the gruesome incident. Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translations, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling.

The first video is a news report about an attempt by the German government to prosecute citizens who recorded and propagated videos of the bloody attack:


Video link

The second video is a report from Der Spiegel featuring detailed information about the atrocity and interviews with eyewitnesses. I was surprised to see the full name and unpixelated mug shot of the perp — I thought that kind of thorough reportage was not allowed in Germany:


Video link

Video transcript #1:

Continue reading →

Update on the Murderous Swordsman of Stuttgart

Posted on by
4

Note: I’m not posting any photos related to the atrocity in Stuttgart, because they are either useless for conveying information (taken from far away, or with the car blocking the view) or so gruesome that they’re not appropriate for this site. Plenty of them are available on the Internet — apparently so many people took cell phone videos and photos that the German authorities were unable to prevent their spread on social media. They’ve appeared on Twitter, for example, although I’m sure they were quickly taken down. I’ll bet Vlad has some — he doesn’t shrink from posting the truth, even when it’s gruesome.

MissPiggy sends this summary:

Apparently the German-Kazakh roommate Senanu A. (39) [also known as Wilhelm L.] saw through the identity of the “Syrian” and passed it on to the BAMF (Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge, Federal Office for Migration and Refugees) in Berlin. This of course makes the scandal even bigger, as a direct connection can be drawn between this bestial murder and the uncontrolled immigration allowed by the Merkel government, and the blood of the victim is directly on the hands of the responsible politicians and their supporters in the media.

Below is MissPiggy’s translation of an excerpt from an article in the Swiss daily Blick:

According to the police, the focus of the insane crime is a personal motive. Mohammed has now confessed to the murder, and that he was actually Jordanian, during an interrogation.

But the 28-year-old is said to have entered Germany in February 2015 under a false identity, according to the Bild. He pretended to be a Syrian. As a Jordanian he would not have received asylum.

Apparently Wilhelm L. saw through the web of lies. During the act Mohammed yelled at his victim: “What did you send to Berlin?” The 36-year-old knew too much.

By the way — we now know the incident in Stuttgart has a Mohammed Coefficient of 100%.

Hello, This is Your Caliph Speaking!

Posted on by
Reply

Yesterday I posted our Hungarian correspondent László’s hypothesis about a possible coded message contained in the latest jihad poster for the Islamic State. Today he sends the follow-up below, with this note: The post of my hypothesis motivated me to do some more research to see if it can actually be proven. The answer is probably in the affirmative.

Hello, This is Your Caliph Speaking!

A Secret Koranic Message on an ISIS Poster Refers to al-Baghdadi’s Sermon

by László

The hypothesis, posted previously at Gates of Vienna, that an ISIS poster contains a hidden message for the Ummah seems to be proven because the supposed message has actually the same core content as Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the Caliph of the Islamic State, has preached. And this fact allows for a further hypothetical conclusion: the poster could be intended to be seen as a message from the Caliph.

This is how Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi’s (in)famous 2014 sermon commences:

Truly all praise belongs to Allah. We praise Him, and seek His help and His forgiveness. We seek refuge with Allah from the evils of our souls and from the consequences of our deeds. Whomever Allah guides can never be led astray, and whomever Allah leads astray can never be guided.

See also “ISIS Rhetoric for the Creation of the Ummah”.

The numbers (6:39) on the suicide belt express a message that is very similar to that of Baghdadi’s, and therefore may indeed refer to the content of this verse:

Koran 6:39

“But those who deny Our verses are deaf and dumb within darknesses. Whomever Allah wills — He leaves astray; and whomever He wills — He puts him on a straight path.”

The subsequent Koran verses are also in line with the content of al-Baghdadi’s sermon.

Baghdadi says:

We seek refuge with Allah from the evils of our souls and from the consequences of our deeds.

This refers to the same event as these verses, namely the judgement of Muslims’ deeds by Allah when they die:

Continue reading →

A Secret Message for the Ummah?

Posted on by
5

Our Hungarian correspondent László proposes an intriguing hypothesis about a detail in the latest jihad poster propagated by the Islamic State.

A Secret Message for the Ummah?

by László

I think it is possible that one new ISIS poster contains a somewhat hidden / secret message for the Ummah. This Jihad Watch post contains the picture (published by Memri) of a suicide belt with a number (6:39). That may refer to Koran 6:39. [The image at the top of this post contains a detail from the poster. See Jihad Watch for the complete graphic.]

I know this assumption and the following conclusions may be a bit far-fetched (but still at least entertaining, I hope). But it may have its own wartime Islamic logic and function — that I will elaborate on at the end of this post.

I think the main function of planting the Koran 6:39 on a poster could be that of a hidden signature of ISIS, as well as a message to awaken and gather the Ummah, and take the Jihad to a whole new level globally.

The following is my analysis, in which I am attempting to decipher the meaning of the hidden message from the surrounding verses of 6:39 below (verses 6:37-6:41):

If my assumption that the (6:39) number means a Koran verse is right, then there really is a message on the poster, which is in fact somewhat hidden. So verse 6:37 may even refer to the “hidden signal” itself on the suicide belt in the picture — a reference that most of the filthy Kuffar will not understand. This verse therefore can be the key (“under the doormat”) that opens and the meaning by authenticating the rest of poster (emphasis added):

6:37

And they say, “Why has a sign not been sent down to him from his Lord?” Say, “Indeed, Allah is Able to send down a sign, but most of them do not know.“

Here is the main message: it calls for the Ummah to gather under the “umbrella brand” of Islam:

6:38

And there is no creature on [or within] the earth or bird that flies with its wings except [that they are] communities like you. We have not neglected in the Register a thing. Then unto their Lord they will be gathered.

So in this context, the “deaf and dumb” in verse 6:39 is itself the wake-up call to the Ummah. And at the same time 6:39 is also a disparagement of the dumb kuffar who will not understand this message anyway. This number is on the suicide belt:

6:39

But those who deny Our verses are deaf and dumb within darknesses. Whomever Allah wills — He leaves astray; and whomever He wills — He puts him on a straight path.

6:40

Say, “Have you considered: if there came to you the punishment of Allah or there came to you the Hour — is it other than Allah you would invoke, if you should be truthful?”

6:41

No, it is Him [alone] you would invoke, and He would remove that for which you invoked Him if He willed, and you would forget what you associate [with Him].

And this verse reveals the underlying strategic goal: to destroy the economy of the West and grab the power on its ruins:

Continue reading →