Category Archives: Islamic Atrocities

Unintended Consequences

Posted on by
18

In addition to an update on Sderot, MC’s latest essay discusses the sequelae of late-stage socialism.

Socialism always involves spending more money (usually other people’s) than the socialist entity can afford, which in turn increases poverty, and, in many cases results in a goodly proportion of the economy being driven by debt and slavery, and the need to eliminate those ‘useless eaters’.

As the Nazis (National Socialists) swept through Poland, they arrested young (mainly Catholic) men and herded them into (slave) Labour Camps, with many ending up in the notorious Auschwitz labour camp.

We are taught about Auschwitz in its later role as a death camp, but before it was a death camp (1944) with massive extermination facilities, it was a huge labour camp where young men and PoWs were put to hard and cruel work. Many had to work alongside the Jewish inmates in housed in the notorious Birkenau camps and were exposed to the same radiation and toxic substances such as mercury and cadmium. There was no ‘health and safety’ for Polish slave labour.

Conditions in these camps were primitive, food was scarce, and many did not survive. Nearly as many Poles and Slavs generally died in the camps as did Jews, Gypsies and Christians (Jehovah’s Witnesses and Evangelicals).

Socialism is expensive, and the Nazis needed to rob Piotr to pay Paulus.

The unintended consequence of Nazism was eventually total and utter defeat as the Anglophone and Communist world turned on Nazi Germany and its vile excesses. Germany needed the slaves and the treasuries of Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland to pay for the ‘welfare’ of the ‘master race’

Is this a familiar picture?

Wokism is Nazism with colour, and although many of the people of Israel are ‘non-white’ they are still Jooz, and thus honorary ‘white supremacists’.

Someone out there is bankrolling ‘Wokism’, bribing people of influence to ignore the rape and murder, the baking of babies and the kidnapping of children. I assume that the usual rent-a-mob has been well-rewarded for their efforts across the civilized world.


Staff sergeant Abraham Wovagen fell in battle in Gaza

Of course, Wokism, is like any other socialist venture, and is a total anachronism. Under Wokism, the white liberal establishment, ‘the deep state’, keep their jobs and their power and their patronistic mentality whilst paying lip service to skin colour prejudice. Jim Crow is back in the form of D’avon Pidgeon. This time Jews or people with white skins are the victims. It is thus acceptable to our elites, even while it is still deeply racist. But in a world that has adopted secular humanism as its main belief system, there are no depths to which a progressive liberal will not sink in order to get their ‘moment in the sun’.

The New York Governor Kathy Hochul thought she had a ‘gotcha’ moment when a dubious and victimless ‘fraud’ case against President Trump brought about an egregious fine. But now the Governor has to try and stem the flood of money out of New York City, real estate, banking and other finance business interests are fleeing the state, in her rush to put one over on the Donald, she and her cronies crossed a line. She blasphemed the rule of law and made President Trump a special case where opinion and emotion were substituted for the required blindness of Justice. There is no justice in a banana republic, only whimsy. The woke New York governor now seems to be panicking because she has destroyed vital business confidence — “Who next?”, one must think. Who next might become a ‘special case’? Is it still safe to trade with New York City-based businesses? Is the state going to use lawfare to solve its deep, deep deficit problems?

Hochul forgot decency in her zeal to be the first get a Trump conviction. There are always unintended consequences when the ends justify the means. I also suspect that she has, by her actions, put the Donald in the White House for the next four years. Overzealous Democrats have only one option left.

Continue reading →

From Gaza to Berlin

Posted on by
106

The topic of this post is not easy write about. What I say here will not earn me any approval. On the one hand, I’ll be excoriated as a tool of the Mossad. On the other, I’ll be denounced as an “anti-Semite”.

So I can’t win, no matter what. But I still feel obligated to write about it, because the issue is an important one that is not being widely discussed in mainstream forums.

These matters are sensitive and contentious, which means that I expect readers to go the extra mile to preserve decorum in the comments. I don’t want the conversation to devolve into an orgy of Jew-hatred, which would be its natural tendency. I know it’s difficult, but it is possible to voice serious criticism of Israel and Jewish groups without invoking the Great Hebrew Menace.

This discussion concerns current events in Gaza. The atrocities of October 7 of last year are a given — I’m not a “denialist” about what happened that day — but they are not the primary topic. My focus is on what has happened in Gaza since October 7.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

As I write, the war in Gaza is still raging, and a ground campaign in Rafah is looming. Critics of the IDF’s actions repeatedly employ the term “genocide”, due to the alarming official Palestinian casualty figures from Gaza. Which is strange, because people who wouldn’t dream of believing the pronouncements of the US government, or the Israeli government, or EU governments, seem to have no problem crediting the Palestinian statistics on casualties in Gaza. The same people who think the Jews inflated the death toll in the Holocaust believe whatever numbers the Poor Palestinians put out.

As if the “Palestinian health authorities” weren’t a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hamas. As if Hamas hasn’t always openly proclaimed that high civilian casualties work to its advantage. Why wouldn’t they inflate those numbers? How could they do otherwise?

Regardless of the actual figures, the damage to the infrastructure of Gaza has been horrific.

It’s very difficult to acquire credible information about conditions in the Gaza Strip, because almost everything published — whether in the mainstream media or the alternative media — is propaganda put out by one side or the other. The current prevalence of AI-generated images and video has made it that much more difficult to separate truth from pseudo-reality.

However, some information may be gleaned from satellite photos, which indicate that well over half of the buildings in the Gaza Strip have been damaged or destroyed. Much of the population of northern Gaza has fled south, and is now trapped between the Israeli-enforced dividing line in central Gaza and the border with Egypt, which enclave is about to be invaded by the IDF. The Egyptians, knowing full well the risks associated with importing large numbers of Palestinians, are only allowing a trickle of traffic through the Rafah border crossing. As a result, a huge number of displaced residents are packed into tent cities near Rafah.

What will become of these refugees when the war is finally over? Israel is not too keen on repopulating the devastated areas of Gaza with them. And some Israeli organizations have plans for postwar Gaza that include establishing new Jewish settlements there. These are not the official plans of the Israeli government, but they are not the ravings of wild-eyed zealots in fringe groups, either. They are being openly discussed in public forums, which means the government is well aware of them and is not trying to shut them down.

If the Palestinians in the tent cities are not to be allowed back into northern Gaza, where then will they be resettled? There is some discussion of “voluntary” migration — that is, conditions in the crowded camps will become so harsh that residents there will be ready to emigrate somewhere, anywhere that will have them. If the Egyptian government can be induced to open the border for a steady, larger flow, this process can begin.

Prime Minister Netanyahu is working towards exactly that end:

On December 25, 2023, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed at the Likud Knesset faction meeting that he was working on the voluntary immigration of Gaza residents to other countries. “Our problem is finding countries that are ready to absorb them, and we are working on it,” Netanyahu said.

It goes without saying that no Islamic nation will accept any refugees from Gaza. They have all made it clear that they do not want Palestinians in their countries. And with good reason — nobody in his right mind would want to import Palestinians. That’s why the Egyptians have steadfastly resisted opening the Rafah crossing fully.

Thus Mr. Netanyahu is, for all practical purposes, expecting the West to take in the wretched refuse from Gaza. Canada, under the inspired leadership of Justin “Baby Doc” Trudeau, has already shown an eagerness to bring in the puir wee bairns of Palestine. I don’t know whether the USA will be similarly welcoming, since this is an election year, but we’ll see. As for the EU, it will vary from country to country, depending on how lefty the government in question is. I would expect Ireland, for example, to take its share, and possibly also Germany, under the Green-led traffic light coalition.

And Israel may have found a different solution to the problem: it is negotiating with Congo to take in the homeless and tempest-tost from Gaza. The article doesn’t mention the issue of payment, but I’m cynical enough to assume that the Congolese, already ridden with poverty and political strife, will extract a high price in return for the placement of Palestinians in their new tropical ghetto.

Regardless of their ultimate destination, the denizens of Gaza are problematic for anyone who is foolish enough to take them in. The Israelis, who have a closer acquaintance with the Palestinians than anyone else (with the possible exception of the Jordanians), have a jaundiced view of them.

Some Israelis — it’s not clear what proportion — are extreme in their attitude. Mia Schem, a former hostage held by Hamas, had this to say:

“It was important to me to relay the truth about the nature of the people who live in Gaza, who they are truly are and what I experienced there,” she said in the interview.

“It is important to you that the world understands, what? That I went through a holocaust,” Schem added. “Everyone over there is a terrorist. [emphasis added]”

Ms. Schem is not alone in her views, and some people are even harsher in their assessment of Gaza. Ilana Mercer (who is Jewish), refers to remarks made by Eliyahu Yossian — an “Israeli analyst and veteran of Unit 8200, a high-tech spy branch of the Israeli military” — according to a tweet from the account of Electronic Intifada:

These days, Israel’s political discourse is marred by the likes of Eliyahu Yossian, a mainstream opinionator. Listening as I did with difficulty to Yossian, I detect the delicate Iranian twang in his accent, although there is no sign of delicacy in this zealot’s worldview. Nothing authentically American, either. “Hamas is not the enemy,” he vociferates, “Gaza is. You level the area, and you kill the largest possible numbers, because the woman there is an enemy, the baby there is an enemy and the first grader is an enemy… and the pregnant woman is the enemy.” Yossian goes on to explain that Israel must not entertain “Western values” because these “blur basic logic.”

“The woman there is an enemy, the baby there is an enemy and the first grader is an enemy”: This is an exact mirror of Hamas’ doctrine about the Jews, by which they justify terrorist attacks that kill Israeli women, children, and the elderly. By definition, no Jew is innocent; all must die.

I don’t have to tell you that these constitute competing genocidal doctrines. In other words, the conflict in Gaza is trending towards a war of extermination. One side or the other will be exterminated.

Therefore, as an alternative, what Mr. Netanyahu is proposing is to export an entire population of what some Israelis consider to be dangerous terrorists who deserve extermination. The aim is to dump them on the Gentiles of the West, or perhaps on the Sons of Ham south of the Sahara. If the price is right, surely Congo or Gabon or Zambia would be willing to accept them. Anywhere but Israel.

Why is he doing that? If they all deserve to be killed, why ship them out to Berlin or Toronto instead of burying their corpses in the rubble of Gaza City and Khan Younis?

The answer, of course, is that this is a cynical strategy that will allow Israel to retain the moral high ground. Since 1948 the Israelis (and Jews in general) have had the reputation of conducting wars in the most humane manner possible, taking more Israeli casualties in order to avoid civilian deaths. It never seemed to do them any good; the Israelis were reviled just as much, no matter what. But they did it anyway. And, at least in the West, no one is acknowledged to wage war more ethically than the Jews of Israel.

Continue reading →

Pro-Israel Rally in Milan

Posted on by
2

In response to pro-Hamas rallies in Italy, supporters of Israel staged a pro-Israel rally in Milan. The event featured Deputy Italian Prime Minister Matteo Salvini as one of its speakers.

Many thanks to HeHa for translating this video report, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading →

Why Does Islam Abuse Women? — It’s the Doctrine, Stupid!

Posted on by
9

The following report by Clare Lopez was published earlier this month by Sharia TipSheet.

Women Under Sharia

Why Does Islam Abuse Women? — It’s the Doctrine, Stupid!

by Clare M. Lopez

Details about the sexual atrocities that HAMAS jihadis perpetrated and self-filmed with glee keep emerging, each more horrific than the last. Even the New York Times is now reporting results of its two-month investigation, including the unspeakable acts of rape, mutilation, torture, and murder committed by these savages. What they too often omit, however, is that it’s all sanctioned as legitimate under Islamic Law (sharia).

“What Hamas Did to the Girls and Women in Gaza” by Hugh Fitzgerald at Front Page Magazine, January 4, 2024

“BEATEN & TORTURED: Bloodied Faces of Karina, 19, Daniela, 19 Agam, 19 Liri, 18 Hamas Hostages” by Dr. Rich Swier, January 9, 2024. Citation from United With Israel, January 8, 2024

“Does Islamic Law Sanction Hamas’ Rape of Captives?” by Robert Spencer at PJ Media, January 19, 2024

  • Here, Robert cites the UK’s Guardian, which not only reported about the mass rape of Israeli captives by HAMAS in the October 7 Shabbat Massacre and after, but noted that captured HAMAS jihadis told Israeli interrogators they were actually instructed to commit such sexual abuse and additionally referred to Qur’anic justification for it (Q 4:3). Read both pieces—they are both revealing and instructive.

The horrors for women living under Taliban rule in Afghanistan never end.

“UN Mission Says Taliban Putting Afghan Women In Prison For Protection From Violence” by RFE/RFL, December 14, 2024

  • Violence by whom? Under sharia, it doesn’t matter: it’s the woman’s fault. Taliban is claiming it’s putting Afghan women in prison for their own protection—after having closed all the state protection centers for women, saying those are “a Western concept”.

“Christian Women Forced to Wear Islamic Dress in Afghanistan” at Persecution.org, January 8, 2024

The Taliban’s Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice is cracking down on all women — Muslim, Christian, or any other faith — who appear in public without being completely covered up either in a ‘proper’ hijab or full mobile tent burqa.

Islamic rule in Iran continues to brutalize women and girls, too. Dr. Rich Swier calls out feminist and other leftist groups whose silence in the face of such abuse is despicable.

“Iran’s Islamic Regime WHIPS Young Woman 74 Times For Not Covering Her Beautiful Hair in Public” at Dr. Rich Swier, citing the Jerusalem Post, “Kurdish-Iranian woman whipped 74 times for not wearing hijab” by Tzvi Joffre, January 7, 2024

  • “Woman in Iran gets 74 lashes for ‘public morals’ violation” at AlArabiya News, 7 January 2024

    Interesting to note that Al Arabiya is a Saudi-owned media outlet based in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. This piece cites an Iranian source who says the whipping penalty was carried out “in accordance…with shariah”.

Continue reading →

Islam: Abolition of Civilisation, Part II

Posted on by
18

Our Indian correspondent The Kafir sends this follow-up to last week’s essay about Islam.

Islam: Abolition of Civilisation (Part II)

by The Kafir

In the year 1988, Salman Rushdie’s novel The Satanic Verses was published. Khomeini issued the fatwa. Salman Rushdie was a British citizen. The UK government immediately forced him into hiding, with heavy police protection. The UK had its Muslims. There was no way to know who among them might kill Rushdie. A mob could have come and lynched him. The British knew all this.

If the British knew all this, one might expect they would figure out all the logical things which followed from the affair: Muslims do not respect the West’s concept of free speech, there is no way to find out which Muslim is a potential killer of a blasphemer, and Muslims become mobs for the most outrageous of causes. Therefore, if the UK wanted to keep its free speech rights, it needed to stop Muslim immigration.

In fact, this should have been done by all the Western countries. Instead they opened the gates wider. They even encouraged Muslim immigration, legal and illegal. For example, Tony Blair. And Angela Merkel.


How did the West reach this point? The times when the elites of the most educated, advanced, prosperous, and happy countries of the West want to destroy the countries they are ruling? And the citizenry seem to be just clapping along?

The answer is that in the nineteenth century a man was born named Karl Marx. He confused the masses, and he frightened the elites. He misunderstood the source of wealth, let the masses loose on the elite, and they started making compromises, and now know nothing except making compromises, with anybody who threatens violence.


Burnham understood that Marxism/Communism/Leftism was also the abolition of morality: ‘“Dialectical logic.” Is simply a devise that declares “whatever serves the interest of communist power is true.” (Burnham quoted in the introduction to Suicide of The West, written by Roger Kimball [page 11, Kindle edition]). And the liberals ruling the West are Marxists lite. They know no absolute morality. It is all relative for them. Therefore, they now have different moral laws for different sections of society.

They started with the industrial workers. According to the leftists, the industrial workers are an exploited lot; therefore they are entitled to use violence. Normal laws of morality do not apply to them. They can picket the industrial plant, can wreck it, can even kill the owners. Because they are exploited. The ruling elites gave in. Perhaps they were afraid that if the workers were not allowed to burn down the industrial plant, they might march to parliament building and burn it instead. This was the first exemption from the moral laws granted by the civilized, and it has been downhill ever since. It led to the destruction of industrial plants in the West and rise of the Dependency Class. Work has this profound magical quality that it creates character in the men doing it. Without work, on welfare, Western people lost that character. Word also got around that being a ‘victim’ or ‘oppressed’ gives one exemption from the moral laws. Liberals began manufacturing ‘victim classes’, and people happily joined, because, well, who wants to be burdened with the morality?

Continue reading →

Islam: Abolition of Civilisation

Posted on by
20

After an extended sabbatical, our Indian correspondent The Kafir returns with an overview of the civilization-destroying ideology that is Islam.

Islam: Abolition of Civilisation

by The Kafir

“Moreover, whatever may be the respective crimes, virtues and deserts of various races, classes and nations, civilized society requires a certain rule and order to hold back from the edge of anarchic savagery where it is always precariously poised. Human beings must have at least a minimum security in life and property, must be able to move through the streets and between the cities, must accept certain common rules in their mutual inter-course, or civilization does not exist. If this necessary order is subverted, the civilization is destroyed, whether the subversion take place from the best or worst of motives, whether or not it is in some supposedly moral sense justified, whether it is carried out by saints or devils. At some point the guardians of a civilization must be prepared to draw the line.” — James Burnham (Suicide of The West, page 227 [Kindle edition])

Human perception is a very strange thing. Man’s mind may have perceived everything needed to visit the moon. But sometimes it may fail to see the most obvious, glaring thing, not for a few moments or days, but for centuries.

What exactly is Islam? A man born in the Arabian city of Mecca around 1400 years ago claimed that he had been contacted by the God who created this world, had been given a book, and had been commanded to preach that man should worship only that God, in formlessness. So far so good.

Each of us believes so many claims by our fellow men. Men are totally free to believe this man also. They are fully entitled to believe that he was a messenger of God, and should worship God the way he said He should be worshipped. There is no problem so far. The world will go about its business, some nations will have good rulers and hence will be rich, others which have not so good rulers will remain poor. There will be aid for the starving.

But that man said something else also. He said that his fellow men had no choice in the matter. They Must either believe that he was a messenger of God, and worship the way he said, or they ‘will have no security in life and property, will not be able to move safely through the streets and between the cities, and his followers are bound by no rules in their mutual intercourse with non-believers.’ (James Burnham paraphrased) That is, he abolished Civilisation. He abolished the moral laws that make Civilisation possible. (Qur’an 8.39, 9.5, 9.29 and hadith Bukhari 1.2.24).

Kafirs have made mistakes in their response to him from the very first day he proclaimed his mission. They did not figure out his true intentions, and they did not even translate his words properly. For example, jihad.

Jihad is variously translated as Holy War, warfare, or just war. But in a war, an army comes, challenges the army of the target country, the two armies fight, and the victorious army gains possession of the country. People start paying taxes to the new government. This is a war. The only way of war between the civilised countries.

Does this happen in jihad? No. From the very first “battle” the Muslims fought, jihad means something else entirely. In jihad, you can attack trade caravans, you can kill non-combatants, you can simply attack a home/village, kill all the men, rape women and sex-enslave them, and enslave children and trade them around like goods; and loot the goods of household. This is sanctioned in the Qur’an, this is sanctioned by the examples of early Muslims, this is sanctioned in hundreds of hadith, and there are whole chapters of sharia manuals devoted to detailing this. The only condition is that you have to share 20% of the looted women, children and goods with the leader of the moment, the Imam/Caliph/Amir.

Does it all sound like a war? This is actually dacoity.

Merriam Webster defines dacoity as “robbery by dacoits — now used in the Indian penal code of robbery by an armed gang of not less than five men” Dacoity is word taken into English from India. The synonym is robbery/loot. The same dictionary defines robbery as “larceny from the person or presence of another by violence or threat.” So the correct translation of jihad is dacoity/robbery. The man made dacoity/robbery lawful against those who did not believe him. He made dacoity/robbery a religious duty.*

And civilisations died. Wherever his followers went, the places they seized, civilisations died. Baghdad or Cordoba are paraded around as examples of Islamic civilisation. That is, Islam is claimed to have established civilisation of its own kind after it has conquered a non-Islamic civilisation. But what are the creations of Baghdad or Cordoba except some translations of Indian/Persian/ Greek texts? Any literature, science, architecture, paintings, roads, canals, dance forms, music, universities? Anything that we take as achievements of a civilisation? In reality, every Muslim kingdom meant only one thing: regular raids on the kafir villages and cities, the killing of men, the looting of women, children and household goods. That is, dacoity.

Continue reading →

Justice? Or Lawfare?

Posted on by
7

Below is MC’s latest report from his vantage point on the border with Gaza.

Justice? Or Lawfare?

by MC

We are all shocked at the barbarity of October 7th, I was there in a small way. But I am more shocked by the collusion of the world in turning the misfortune of a few Joooz into a political toolset.

Remember all those world leaders and other VIPs rushing to Israel, to Be’eri, to Sderot to shed their crocodile tears?

I was cynical at the time, counting down the days until they turned on us. And so they have.

For many years now, Islam has been the moving force in Europe. The endless greed to get our mitts on a small proportion of that Middle Eastern Oil Gelt has meant prostrating ourselves, bums in the air, to get our bit of the Sunni manna.

Jews have always been despised. I was thinking this morning of how William Shakespeare deals with his Shylock character in The Merchant of Venice, and particularly Portia’s lecture to him on the quality of mercy.

Antonio, the hero, is a stupid gambler who lucks out. He has borrowed money from Shylock, and has agreed to Shylock’s brutal ‘collections’ policy, and now Shylock wants to collect his “pound of flesh, closest to Antonio’s heart.”

Shylock is supposed to have mercy, but he also has a business to run. The end result is that Shylock gets shafted and Antonio gets away with defrauding the Jooo.

Shakespeare is manipulating the audience. He makes Antonio a nice guy and Shylock a greedy, malignant bully. The play tells us that it is OK to so twist law so that the hero wins against the nasty despised (but innocent) Jooo.

Antonio defaulted on his loan, and wriggled out of the consequences, leaving Shylock holding the debt and unable to collect. Shylock is depicted as the villain, and thus his rights can be violated at will. This is how oppression works.

Substitute the ‘poor Palestinians’ for Antonio and we get a modern day version of that same scenario. Israel (Shylock) is trying to ensure that Hamas (Antonio) cannot prosper from defaulting on the loan (Oct 7th). But Portia (the global community) supports Hamas and will use any device to ensure that Israel cannot rectify the failure to pay. Hamas is in default but wants to manipulate world opinion to shirk the consequences.

Was this shirking preplanned? I would guess that the Macrons and Bidens of this world don’t care. As puppets, they do and say as their masters dictate. Israel is a state that (sometimes) upholds God’s laws and has a very positive national identity, secure borders and a right-of-centre political view. And is thus despised.

It is only justice when the law is blind. We must like Antonio, but we have been taught to hate Shylock, so when Shylock seeks justice, he is deemed not eligible.

Shakespeare is clever: he entices us to support the unjust because our emotion goes with Antonio as the ‘hurt underdog’. We lose sight of Antonio’s greed, folly and stupidity; of his gambling when he cannot afford to lose; and we transfer our opprobrium to his victim who is ugly, angry and out of pocket…

Nothing much has changed since the Gutmenschen of Kiev took out their rage on their innocent victims at Babi Yar.

Ask yourself: Who are the real occupiers, settlers and crusaders?

Is it those Muslims pouring across open borders bringing their vile animalistic culture/religion with them, and expecting us to kowtow to their demands?

Our political masters want us to be ‘multicultural’ (divided), to be tolerant of religious bestiality in our midst. We are supposed to believe that all cultures are equally valid, and to thus despise our own culture in order to elevate the ‘other’.

It is now obvious that Oct 7th was to be a crusade, and given the evacuation of the Gaza peripheral communities, in some ways it worked. The strike paralyzed the IDF high command for some six to eight hours. During which time the Hamas ‘army’ could have taken some key IDF bases and cut Israel in half.

But the lure of nubile young flesh proved too much, and the looting, kidnapping, rape and murder were just too tempting.

Continue reading →

Washington Promoting Jihad in Schools

Posted on by
1

The following report by Clare Lopez was published earlier this month by Sharia TipSheet.

Washington Promoting Jihad in Schools

by Clare M. Lopez

“Blame Federal Government for Rise of Teen Jihadists” by Carole Hornsby Haynes at World Net Daily, December 8, 2023

  • What is allowed to be taught in GovEd schools across America is influencing impressionable young students to accept and even embrace Islam, sharia, and jihad.

“Pro-Hamas White House Staffers Protest Biden’s Support for Israel in Front of White House” by Kristinn Taylor at Gateway Pundit, December 13, 2023

  • Why were White House staffers allowed to demonstrate on White House grounds against Israel and in support of HAMAS? Did they face any consequences for their actions?

“White House condemns CAIR director’s recent comments about Oct. 7 attack” by Alex Gangitano at The Hill, December 8, 2023

  • A follow-up here on the Biden administration distancing itself from Nihad Awad’s despicable post-October 7 comments.

“Biden’s ‘Historic’ Muslim Judicial Nominee Served on Board of Anti-Israel, Terrorist-Loving Think Tank” by Chuck Ross at the Free Beacon, December 13, 2023

“Israel’s neighbors could be doing more to help civilians in Gaza” by Shoshana Bryen at the Washington Times, January 3, 2023

Continue reading →

Marion Maréchal: Civil Peace is Threatened by Uncontrolled Immigration

Posted on by
8

Marion Maréchal is the niece of Marine Le Pen and the Executive Vice President of Reconquête, Éric Zemmour’s party. In the following video Ms. Maréchal describes current conditions in France that portend a civil war between Muslims and native French infidels.

Pay particular attention to the body language and facial expressions of the presenter when her interruptions fail to deflect Marion Maréchal from saying what she means to say.

Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading →

Striking Their Necks

Posted on by
4

I read a heart-warming story this week in The Farmville Herald about a live nativity scene put on by a Baptist church in Powhatan County, Virginia. Powhatan is a rural county southwest of Richmond, about two hours’ drive from here.

When I saw the photo reproduced at the top of this post, it made me think of the report from earlier this week about the town of Rüsselsheim am Main in Germany, where life-size nativity figures were beheaded by persons unknown, as shown in the photo below:

What happens when the beheaders of Rüsselsheim encounter a live nativity scene?

I assume the perpetrators in Rüsselsheim were Muslims. I also assume that a culture-enricher with a machete would find it far more satisfying to feel his blade cut through muscle, bone, and sinew than through those boring styrofoam figures.

It’s not like Islam has any moral qualms about “striking the necks” of unbelievers. They are, after all, idolaters — mushrikun, polytheists — who deserve to be killed. Decapitation is considered to be a quick, merciful means of dispatching them.

Intuition tells me that there must be numerous cities in Western Europe where the few remaining Christians would even now be reluctant to stage a live nativity production. They can’t talk about such matters, obviously, for fear of being brought up on “hate speech” charges, but they are well aware of what happens to Christians when a significant proportion of the local population is of the Islamic persuasion. People tend to lose their heads.

So public processions and performances related to Christmas, Easter, etc. will gradually be phased out. Christianity will retire within walled spaces, and have no public symbols or signage. Which is the way it’s supposed to be in Islamic countries, where Christians are dhimmis who pay the jizyah meekly and show themselves to be subdued.

Not in Powhatan, not yet. But definitely in Nickelsdorf, Aarhus, Lund, Aberystwyth, and Erquy. If not now, soon.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

A side-note — this is the nativity scene I just set up in the living room here at Schloss Bodissey:

Continue reading →

Justice For Saman

Posted on by
Reply

In the spring of 2021 a young Pakistani woman named Saman Abbas disappeared from Novellara in Italy, and was assumed to have been “honor-killed” by her parents and male relatives. Months afterwards her body was found. Saman’s father and mother fled to Pakistan. In the meantime, her uncle and two cousins were arrested in various European countries.

Investigators had concluded that Saman’s uncle Danish was the one who actually killed her, but in his testimony in court, Danish denied committing the act, and placed the blame elsewhere: on Saman’s mother.

Italian prosecutors attempted to extradite Shabbar Abbas, Saman’s father, from Pakistan, and eventually succeeded. The following article doesn’t mention whether Saman’s mother was also extradited, so it’s possible that she was being tried in absentia.

The Criminal Court in Reggio Emilia has now handed down a verdict. Finally, after more than two and a half years, there is justice for Saman — of a sort. By European standards, the sentences imposed were stiff: the parents got life. But the cousins got off scot-free.

If it had happened in Sweden or Germany, the court would probably have treated the parents much more leniently, taking into account the “cultural differences” that made them believe that what they did was not a crime (which it wasn’t, not under Islamic law, but that’s a whole different story). In Sweden they would have probably gotten off with a couple of years in a comfortable prison with racquetball facilities, and then some hours of community service.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from Il Sole 24 Ore:

Life imprisonment for the parents of Saman, 14 years for the uncle, cousins acquitted

No compensation for the brother and boyfriend of Saman, both civil parties in the trial of the death of the 18-year-old.

December 19, 2023

Life imprisonment for the father, Shabbar Abbas, and for the mother, Nazia Shaheen. Fourteen years for the uncle, Danish Hasnain. The cousins Ibrahim Ijaz and Nomanhulaq were acquitted and ordered released immediately. The criminal court of Reggio Emilia ruled in the Saman Abbas (18) murder trial after almost five hours of deliberations.

No compensation for the brother and boyfriend of Saman, both of whom were civil parties in the trial for the death of the 18-year-old. It emerges from the ruling by the Reggio Emilia Criminal Court that the parents are sentenced to life imprisonment, fourteen years for the uncle, while acquitting the two cousins. Compensations are instead granted to associations for violence against women (€25,000 each), to the Islamic ones (€10,000), to the Union of Lower Reggio Municipalities (€30,000) and the municipality of Novellara (€50,000).

Previous posts about the honor killing of Saman Abbas:

Continue reading →

So-Called ‘Women’s Groups’ Abandon Women to Islam — Silence is Complicity

Posted on by
4

The following report by Clare Lopez was published earlier this month by Sharia TipSheet.

Women Under Sharia

So-Called ‘Women’s Groups’ Abandon Women to Islam — Silence is Complicity

by Clare M. Lopez

This month’s litany of abuses against women living under Islamic Law (sharia) may seem monotonously repetitive — and indeed, unfortunately, it is. The Iranian regime continues its unconscionable assault against women’s rights, indeed, in the larger scope, against basic human rights. Honor killing of women and girls by Muslim men and even other Muslim family members, remains also a horrific constant in places where obedient devotion to Islamic mores remains the rule. Feminist groups worldwide remain notably silent not just on the sexual atrocities HAMAS committed against women and girls during the October 7, 2023 Shabbat Massacre, but on the routine mistreatment of women and girls across the Islamic world. But at least some are beginning to call them out.

“Austria: Syrian man kills wife with 19 stab wounds — His defence lawyer describes the crime as a ‘tragic love story’” at medforth.biz, December 13, 2023

“Brother Allegedly Murders Sister in Honor Killing” at khybernews.tv, December 7, 2023

“Suppression of Women’s Rights in Iran Intensifies” at iranwire.com, November 20, 2023

“Female soccer fans in Iran allowed into Tehran stadium for men’s game. FIFA head praises progress” at Fox News, December 14, 2023

  • One small step in the right direction!

“Honoring Iranian People’s Struggle, EU Parliament Awards Sakharov Prize to Mahsa Amini’s Family” at ncr-iran.org, 12th December 2023

  • A solemn recognition of the death penalty too many Iranian women and girls suffer for alleged violations of draconian dress codes under the Islamic Republic of Iran’s clerical regime.

Continue reading →

Hamas and the Annihilation of the Jews

Posted on by
15

Below is MC’s latest update from Sderot, with an extensive preface about the nature and history of Hamas.


‘Hamas, Hamas, all Jews to the gas’

Hamas and the Annihilation of the Jews

by MC

Hamas is a ‘brotherhood’ that seeks solely to kill Jews, as commanded by Islamic scripture: Koran, Hadith and Sunna. Whilst parts of the Koran may condemn murder, these parts are usually from the Mecca period, and thus often quoted to the infidel as a claim to innocence and peaceful intention, but are abrogated in favour of the violence of the Medina period.

Like calling Jews ‘Christ-killers’ (as happened to me just a few years ago), Muslims are very aware that Mohammad was fatally poisoned by one of his captured Jewish sex slaves.

In the Mecca period, the ‘holy land’ was acknowledged as Jewish. In the Medina period the good Muslim was instructed to behead all Jews and Christians.

Abrogation is a device used in Islam to iron out the many contradictions in the Koran, which is an incredibly confusing document and gives rise to at least four schools of interpretation. Sufism is the least violent, and it is this that the Sunni and Shia will use to convey peaceful religious doctrines to the enemy whilst planning his more violent demise.

Islam is not a religion as we in the West understand religion. It is a tyrannical form of theocratic government more akin to a 20th-century dictatorship. Life is not sacred in Islam, and the ends justify the means (amorality). Haj Amin al-Husseini and Hassan al-Banna, the founders of the PLO/Hamas, were indeed acolytes of Adolf Hitler, and later fell into the Marx/Lenin/Stalin camp of the Communist International.


The top leaders of these organisations trained under KGB supervision. They are anti-Israel and anti-American, but will happily accept the American taxpayer’s gold.

Hamas (and Gaza) are entirely financed from outside the country. It has taken 7th October to expose the deep, deep Jew-hatred that motivates states such as Spain, Norway, the UK and Belgium to readily finance the extermination of Jooz. These states say that they do not want to be seen as anti-Jew, but their actions towards the Jewish State of Israel are reprehensible and probably driven by their Globalist/Satanic desire to remove Torah from the scenario.

The US Administration, too, says one thing, but does another. O’Biden supposedly supports Israel’s right to defend itself, but is at the same time making sure that Israel cannot win. He has started three wars on his watch: Ukraine by embargoing Nordstream 2, Israel by donating $6 billion to Iran, and Guyana by removing sanctions from Venezuela.

Only Israel gets loaded with responsibility for ‘civilian casualties’. Collateral damage in the US-led bombing of Zagreb were swept under the carpet. Where are the howls of rage as Hamas fighters violate Jewish women and children, violate the Helsinki accords, and destroy agricultural property?

Hamas uses its citizens (and ours) as human shields. By law this becomes their crime and their responsibility — except when fighting Jooz, it seems. In the Koranic context this is ‘ethical’, and thus in a multicultural society must be given the same credibility as Judeo-Christian values, if not more, because Judeo-Christian value are those of the dreaded white male supremacy context.

Continue reading →

Sympathy for the Devil — HAMAS

Posted on by
5

The following report by Clare Lopez was published earlier this month by Sharia TipSheet.

Sympathy for the Devil — HAMAS

by Clare M. Lopez

Although the Biden administration continues publicly to declare its firm support for Israel and its right to defend itself against HAMAS, behind the scenes there are reports that what the Biden team really wants is for Israel to finish its war in Gaza as quickly as possible and with as few civilian casualties as possible… even if that means that HAMAS and its leadership survive.

More indicators of anti-Israel bias among Biden administration officials:

  • “Senior CIA official posted pro-Palestinian propaganda on social media” at Jewish News Syndicate, November 29, 2023
  • Interestingly, this CIA official is reported to have posted support for the International Crisis Group (ICG), the Washington, D.C. think tank formerly headed by Robert Malley, the now-suspended Biden admin envoy to the Vienna Iran nuclear talks. Others at the ICG (although not necessarily this official) were recruited by Malley to the Iran Experts Initiative, an Iranian regime influence operation deeply embedded inside the U.S. national security community.

Over at the Department of Veterans Affairs, an appellate attorney in the Office of the General Counsel posted a video on social media in which she appeared to mock Israel’s anguish over its people held hostage by HAMAS:

Meanwhile, members of the Democrat Party’s ‘Jihad Squad’ have come under fire for remarks that seem to diminish the horror of HAMAS atrocities, especially against Israeli women:

  • “‘Squad’ member grilled by fellow Dems for criticizing Israel when asked about Hamas rapes” by Ray Lewis at 10 WJAR, December 4, 2023

Here is an exposé on the Muslim Brotherhood Imam at the ADAMS Center who’s been a favorite of multiple US Presidents at Inaugural and National Prayer Days for many years. President Joe Biden even appointed him to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom in 2022. His term doesn’t expire until May 2024:

Continue reading →