Flying in the Culture-Enrichers

It’s not a conspiracy theory, but a fact: the German government has been flying illegal “asylum seekers” directly into the country.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

For €76 million: The government lets asylum seekers fly in directly

Asylum seekers can now reach Germany comfortably. Some travel via public transport, others are even brought directly to Germany by the federal government using airplanes — and it costs a lot.


The federal government has flown almost 20,000 asylum seekers directly to Germany in the past five years.

Last year alone there were almost 4,500 people, as can be seen from the response from the Federal Ministry of the Interior to a request from AfD MP Stephan Brandner, which was made available to Junge Freiheit.

“These are people in need of protection who, in principle, do not go through an asylum procedure in Germany,” says the explanation in the document. The Ministry of the Interior relies on the Residence Act. Section 23, paragraph 1 states: “For reasons of international law or humanitarian law or to protect the political interests of the Federal Republic of Germany, the supreme state authority may order that foreigners from certain countries or groups of foreigners defined in some other way be granted a residence permit.”

[Did I get this right? To PROTECT the POLITICAL interests? Well, if those few words didn’t let the cat out of the bag and into the conscious of the masses, as if they ever would read this, then nothing will. Germany is DOOMED.]

Germany pays almost everything for asylum seekers

Most of them came from Syria. Other countries of origin included South Sudan, Yemen, the Republic of Congo, Eritrea and Somalia. 12,022 of them were minors at the time of admission. Most people since the statistics began were flown in in 2021. At that time, almost 6,000 people came to the Federal Republic in this fashion.

Particularly explosive: Apparently, the federal government considered men more vulnerable than women. Last year, they brought more male migrants to Germany than female migrants. [I guess you’ll need far more hostile males than females when you actively promote the game Taharrush as an effective culture-changer.]

Continue reading

Your Secret Decoder Ring

The following text by Vlad Tepes appeared in his links post last Wednesday in a slightly different form:

This one [video] might deserve a few words though. One of the issues that comes up now and again is the confusion people have with the notion that the left is somehow hypocritical. They are not. They are using Marxist dialectics to achieve a certain outcome. This isn’t hypocrisy because it isn’t a moral failing on their part (from their perspective), or a lack of vision.

A couple of recent examples of dialectics could be when Trudeau went to Japan and lectured Italy’s newly elected female Prime Minister on her quite rational policies concerning group rights for people with non-standard sexual practices. Trudeau publicly admonished her for failing to deconstruct and ultimately criminalize the values that made her country the source of Western Civilization in many ways. He did this in Japan. Probably the least diverse nation on Earth with policies of both systemic racism and racism by cultural norms. Not that I am judging that. Japan has a right to protect and enjoy its own culture, which clearly works for them as they have a staggeringly successful nation with low crime, massive trust, efficient operations, clean streets, low drug use and so on and so on and so on. But it is interesting that Trudeau did not attempt to lecture the Japanese leader on his failure to destroy his own country with Marxist policies of diversity, equity and inclusion, deciding to focus on Italy instead.

Also we have not heard Trudeau comment on the Chinese policy of not allowing effeminate men to appear on television. I think Canada should send the entire CBC to China. That’ll learn ‘em. If CBC can benefit China half as much as it benefits Canada, Canada won’t have to worry about Chinese influence anymore or Marxist manifest destiny, and China won’t be a threat to anyone much longer.

Another example is the designation of “oligarch” to a person as opposed to “philanthropist”. Bill Gates and George Soros are somehow philanthropists while any rich, powerful and connected person who uses his wealth for the counter-revolution is an oligarch. So this is dialectical. Not hypocrisy, because it is the weaponization of concepts and language through multiple means to create an outcome which always moves the culture and nation to the left. Always more state control. Islamophobia as a pejorative is usually used when someone says something true about Islam. It shuts people up and moves the focus of evil intent to the messenger. This is not hypocrisy. This is dialectics. Like “climate denial”, “transphobia” and many other devices intended to be destructive to every aspect of our civilization.

The host of this video may also be shy of the whole nature of his own point in his analysis of what Democrats mean when they say “democracy”. This is a dialectic term as well. They are using what Stephen Coughlin refers to as “initiate language”. They are using the term “democracy” as Lenin did when he named his party “The Socialist Democrat Party” in Russia. The US Democrats have a core that is called the DSA or Democratic Socialists of America. They know perfectly well what they mean when they use the term. They also know how we hear the term and what we think they mean.

Continue reading

The European Union Will Shut Your Mouth For You

The European Union is planning a new set of draconian speech restrictions to be imposed on all major social media platforms. The “pandemic” is simply the most obvious and most recent excuse for the crackdown. It’s obvious that the Powers That Be are determined to enforce their groupthink on all citizens.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Uncut News. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

The mother of all censorships is approaching. The digital law eliminates all opinions that contradict the system.

The Digital Services Act (DSA), an EU-level regulation, is practically the mother of all censorship. Under the guise of online platforms’ transparency and accountability, any opinion that goes against the system is eliminated. More specifically, the regulation obliges the platforms to mitigate risks such as misinformation or election rigging with the help of “trusted” bodies that will censor everything.

The turbulent times of the pandemic have highlighted the aggressive censorship practiced by the authorities, combined with social networks no longer shying away from eliminating voices, particularly those of professionals and medical luminaries, who disagree with the official narrative. During the pandemic there was virtually only one opinion, and those who dared to disagree were ostracized and publicly lynched. Censoring the opinions of people outside of the medical field wasn’t so destructive, but the fact that reputable and respected medical researchers became pariahs overnight simply for daring to point out the flaws in logic and the distortion of science itself is unthinkable.

EU leaders have consistently complained about low vaccination rates in some countries, including Romania, and pointed fingers at “conspiracy theories” circulating on social media. [Well, everybody who read the SPARS document from Johns Hopkins University knew straightaway what was coming.] Did they make a difference in our country? In part, because more important was the survival instinct of the population, who sensed something was wrong and chose to resist the pressure or, when they had no choice, to stick with the sham vaccine. In the meantime, all the “conspiracy theories” have come true, but public attention has been deliberately drawn to other crises. Eagerly preparing for the next pandemic, which will depend very much on who wins the battle between the two world orders, the European Union is now introducing an official act of total censorship.

General Surveillance

The Digital Services Act is a regulation that applies directly across the EU. Obligations imposed on very large online platforms and search engines include monitoring their risk management measures through independent audits. The platforms must also contain risks such as misinformation or election manipulation, cyber-violence against women or the endangerment of minors on the Internet. [I bet that the LGBT crap will be pushed and opposing voices will be silenced that way.] The law also provides for measures to combat illegal content online, including illegal goods and services. The DSA provides new mechanisms for users to report illegal content online and requires platforms to work with specialized “trusted whistleblowers” to identify and remove illegal content, as well as effective protections for users, including the ability to override platform decisions, challenge moderation of content, based on new mandatory information for users when their content is removed or restricted.

Continue reading

The Political Environment

In Germany, the Advisory Council on the Environment (Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen, SRU) is a scientific body advising the federal German government about its future environmental policy. It is theoretically independent, and does not take direct instructions from the government concerning the preparation of its reports.

In its latest report, the SRU outlines how the political process can effect change in citizens’ behavior that will benefit the “environment”.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the SRU. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Politics has a duty: Facilitate environmentally friendly behavior

The environmental crises of our time can only be overcome if we change the way we live — that is, how we live, consume, travel and eat. It is the task of politics to facilitate, encourage and also demand environmentally friendly behavior by setting the appropriate course. In this special report, the SRU (Expert Council on the Environment) shows how this can be achieved. [Eat your bugs, freeze, work hard, pay 99% taxes and shut up, or we will do it for you.]

To this end, politicians should first analyze which factors have so far made environmentally friendly behavior difficult. Political measures can begin here. Contextual conditions can be changed in such a way that they facilitate ecological solutions, whether through price signals, infrastructure or regulation. In concrete decision-making situations, people who want to behave in an environmentally friendly way should be better supported, for example through information and advice. In the longer term, environmental education and a shift in societal values can lay the foundation for change.

In some areas it is politically controversial whether politics should influence the behavior of the population more. Public acceptance can be improved through transparent communication on planned measures and their effects, through a targeted combination of instruments and through citizen participation.

In this report, the SRU analyzes when the behavior should be addressed, which measures are suitable and how these can be implemented politically. The report provides recommendations for concrete implementation in the areas of meat consumption, smart phones and energy-saving renovation. [I bet they do.]

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

Hey, the Bugs Ain’t So Bad

I’ve often recommended an excellent blog called Conservative Tree House. I read the site every day, because Sundance (who does most of the political posting there) is almost invariably right in his predictions on domestic American politics. He has the knack for research and analysis that enables him to forecast the upcoming political trends in this country with uncanny accuracy.

His basic premise is that the national leadership of the Republican Party is thoroughly globalist in outlook, and is interested only in preserving its funding sources. Winning elections is of secondary importance; it’s the money that matters. And, when winning would compromise the continued flow of cash, the party will covertly make common cause with the Democrats to make sure the Republican candidate loses. That’s what happened in 2016 when Donald Trump unexpectedly won the Republican presidential nomination.

The same coalition was at work in 2020, and is currently being mobilized to stop Trump in 2024. Sundance calls it the “R.A.T. alliance” — Republicans Against Trump.

He has provided us with a useful prediction for the upcoming political season. He advises us to watch for the Republicans to start saying, in effect:

“Hey, the bugs ain’t so bad.”

Here’s a sample of what he posted today:

People were confused ten months ago when I said the 2024 DeSantis coalition will be fully laughable once they start saying, “Hey, the bugs ain’t so bad.” However, it’s the natural conclusion to this R.A.T. alliance. Those who were hiding as CONservatives in order to retain their influence and affluence, are merging into the traditional big corporate Republican Party apparatus and reflecting an attitude that says elitism isn’t so bad after all.


Another dynamic that is really interesting to watch is to remember the GOPe establishment Republicans were the support system for the 2016 Trump-Russia nonsense. In 2016, the professional Republicans joined with the leftist Democrats in their Never Trump effort to support Hillary Clinton.

Those Bush establishment Republicans are now in an alignment with the conservative pundits (Team Cruz, now Team Ron) who previously were attacking the fabrication of the Trump-Russia narrative.

This “Russiagate wasn’t so bad,” in combination with the “Bugs might not be too bad,” in combination with the “Big Tech ain’t so bad” Elon love, is buckets of funny. They hate me for pointing it out. Actually, they hate me for everything, but it’s fun to point out how easily the CONservatives compromise themselves for money.

At the end of the day, that’s what all of these alliances are about, MONEY!

Continue reading

The Survival of the Fittest Slave

The Hungarian government seems to believe that we’re in for another “pandemic”, and that we should prepare for it. Our Hungarian correspondent László has the report.

The Survival of the Fittest Slave

Shut Up and Prepare for the Next Plandemic, Slaves!

by László

The obvious brief translation [from Newspeak] of the Hungarian FM’s below speech recently held at the WHO General Assembly: ‘The next plandemic is coming and we’re submitting to tyranny again.’

Newspeak is easy-peasy!

The translation of the article from Pesti Srácok:

Péter Szijjártó: Hungary is prepared for a possible new health crisis

Hungary has taken all the necessary and possible measures since the coronavirus outbreak to prepare for a possible next health crisis and to be able to protect people’s lives, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade Péter Szijjártó said in Geneva on Tuesday. According to the ministry’s statement, the minister pointed out at the World Health Organisation (WHO) General Assembly that the past three years have been challenging, one of the most serious being the coronavirus epidemic.

“The most important task for the international community now would be to prepare for a similar challenge in the future,” he warned, but said that to do so, “over-politicisation of international health must be avoided.”

“We believe that politics and ideology have nothing to do with saving human lives. If geopolitics is confused with health issues, it will cost many lives, and nobody wants that,” he said.

Szijjártó underlined that the experience of the successful Hungarian epidemic response is that it would have cost many more lives if geopolitical aspects had been taken into account when saving lives.

“If we had just waited for the President of the European Commission to order vaccines by text message, we would have saved many fewer lives”, he said.

He added that the government had instead acted by buying vaccines from the East [China], the effectiveness of which had been proven by Hungarian experts. The result was that Hungary was able to launch the fastest vaccination campaign in the European Union, the first among member states to lift restrictions and the first to deliver 8.6 million doses of vaccines to countries in need, he said.

The minister stressed that the pandemic had made it clear that it was vital to build strategic capacity that might normally be considered unnecessary or too expensive, as it could save lives in a crisis.

Continue reading


It’s brass monkey weather in Antarctica this fall.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Report24. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Extreme cold in Antarctica is coming earlier than expected this year

Apparently there are too many measuring stations from different nations in Antarctica, so that fraud in the sense of climate madness is not possible. Since the beginning of May, temperatures as low as -76.4°C [-105.5°F] have been measured at the Vostok research station. However, is still autumn in the current season of the southern hemisphere. Low temperatures are unusual for this time of year. The norm for the location in May is -61°C to -64°C [-77°F to -83°F].

Climate fanatics might consider it a success. Is it because they glue themselves to the ground in European cities that temperatures are dropping at the South Pole? Hardly likely. However, it is a proven fact that the temperatures in the Antarctic in 2023 will be significantly lower than the ten-year average. Between 2005 and 2015, temperatures between -61°C and -64°C were measured for the month of May.

Extreme cold should not be reached for months

The lowest temperatures are usually measured in Vostok when the northern hemisphere has its hottest summer — i.e. July, August and sometimes September. The fact that the Antarctic winter broke out in May with such temperatures is considered a special feature. The Russian measuring station was set up in 1957 at a distance of 1,300 kilometers from the South Pole at an altitude of 3,500 meters. The previous negative temperature record is said to have been reached on July 28, 1997 with -91°C [-132°F] (Wikipedia speaks of “unconfirmed”, July 21, 1983 with -89.2°C is confirmed). The warmest day in recorded history was January 5, 1974 with “only” -14°C [+7°F].

Of course, spot temperature records are due to “weather” and not the “climate” that is supposed to be warming, and from which we are all supposed to die unless we regress to a pre-industrial age in trees and in caves. At least that is the plan of the climate apocalypticists — although many of them also dream of a depopulation of the earth.

Temperatures in Antarctica have been falling for 40 years

As early as 2021, scientists reported the “coldest winter season in more than 60 years” in Antarctica. Since this trend has been emerging since 2021, one could cautiously speak of “climate” here. It would be time for politicians to come to their senses and stop destroying the wealth of Western countries and citing some fictitious climate targets as the reason for doing so. [But that would throw a spanner into the works of the Evil Globalist Agenda, and we can’t have that, now, can we?]

Continue reading

Rob Roos: Stop the Agenda 2030 Utopia

Rob Roos is a Dutch politician who represents the party JA21 (Right Answer 21) in the European Parliament. In the following video Mr. Roos speaks in the EP in Strasbourg about the EU’s “climate” policies that aim to put Dutch farmers out of business.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Everybody Gets to Stay

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from the conservative Austrian site Unzensuriert:

Hardly any deportations: Four-fifths of all illegals remain in EU

May 9, 2023

The latest numbers from the European statistics authority Eurostat show a dangerous trend. Four-fifths of all illegal migrants remain in the EU, in spite of orders to leave. The Austrian Peoples’ Party speaks of a total breakdown of the Union.

Over one million illegal migrants in the EU

According to Eurostat, around 420,000 people have received orders to leave the EU because they have no valid right to stay. Only about 78,000 people have actually complied with this order. In spite of the order, a full 82% have remained.

That is the worst figure in the last ten years. Altogether, the Eurostat numbers show that about 1,059,000 people are illegally in the EU.

The rule of law capitulates to mass immigration

For the liberal delegation leader in the European Parliament, Harald Vilimsky, these devastating numbers show a capitulation of the rule of law to unrestricted mass immigration as well as a total failure of the EU. Because the already generously laid out asylum proceedings in many member states, in the rare cases of a negative ruling, have had no consequences. They simply stay. Vilimsky continues:

“The EU has long since surrendered its right to decide which and how many people can remain in their territory. Whoever is there remains — even if he has no right to do so. This policy is a real magnet for mass migration. The migration pact which is under discussion will change exactly nothing. On the one hand, because it contains nothing to enable the EU to close its external borders, and on the other hand, because it contributes nothing to solve the deportation dilemma.”

The Next Scam: Climate Refugees

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Residents of island countries

Now Germany is supposed to take in “Climate Refugees”

Does Germany bear responsibility for the inhabitants of island states who have to leave their homes because of global warming? Experts propose a “climate passport” that entitles people to permanent residence in the Federal Republic. [Can anyone show me one island, besides Atlantis and those that the mainstream media have peddled for years as “sinking”, that has sunk into the Ocean in the last two thousand years? And by that I don’t mean through the stupidity of man because of coral reef mining and land-erosion along the coastline or volcanic or other seismic events.]


The German Advisory Council on Integration and Migration (SVR) has called on the federal government to prepare for the acceptance of “climate refugees”. “If it is not possible to curb climate change, climate migration will continue to increase on the one hand,” warned SVR Deputy Chairwoman Birgit Leyendecker, as reported by Spiegel.

Germany must take in those people whose homeland is no longer habitable due to climatic change. This particularly affects the people of island states because the sea level is rising there.

Permanent residence thanks to the “climate pass”

Specifically, the body that advises the federal government proposes introducing a “climate passport”. According to the experts, anyone who can show one should be able to enjoy permanent residence in Germany. [Now that will be another thriving business for the Soros Crime Family.]

Anyone who is only significantly, but not entirely, affected by climate change should receive a “climate card” that entitles them to a limited stay. When the most serious consequences have been eliminated, the migrants can return to their homeland. Adaptive measures would also have to be taken in such a case. What that could look like in concrete terms is still unclear.

Claudia Roth wants to give “climate refugees” German passports

A “climate work visa” is also planned. This is aimed at people without special qualifications, but who could show an employment contract. As for the “climate card”, the number must be capped.

The Greens member of the Bundestag Claudia Roth had previously spoken in 2019 about the prospects for “climate refugees” to stay. At the time, she demanded that they be given German citizenship. “The climate crisis is the cause of migration and flight — especially in the global south, which has contributed the least to global warming. Climate protection is therefore a question of global justice,” emphasized Roth. [Lots of cultural Marxist buzzwords, but not one shred of real evidence. Business as usual in the genocide game.]

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

All Your Kids Are Belong to Us

Multiple EU member states are following the EU policy of removing children from their parents if they show too much attachment to their mothers and fathers. Because that weakens their attachment to the State, and we can’t have that, now, can we?

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Uncut News.

Note: this text was translated from Romanian to German, and then from German to English, so the syntax may get a little bumpy from time to time:

New EU policy: State confiscation of children for “over”-attachment to the mother

Being loving parents has already become a crime in EU countries. This has led to the state tearing children from their families and locking them up in social centers because they are too attached to their mothers. Child confiscation measures have multiplied and spread to more and more EU countries, which is the new EU policy, and Romania will also join this policy through the controversial child monitoring center, which is a milestone in the NRP.

The European Parliament’s Petitions Committee was embroiled in a major scandal last Wednesday after MEPs rejected a report against Germany’s abusive policy of removing children from their families. The report might have had a significant impact on the German state, which would have been forced to return children to their families, says Marius Tudor, an adviser in the European Parliament. One of the reasons children were taken from their families was “excessive attachment to the mother”, since in Germany that would be against the safety of the child.

“At school, the child said he loved his mother, missed his mother, wanted to stay with his mother, and child protection kicked in. This is also the case of a Romanian girl in Germany, the daughter was taken away and placed in an institution because she expressed her love for her mother at school. For two years the little girl was taken away from her mother and father and for four months the poor mother was not even allowed to visit her child in this social center. Now she can only visit her regularly, but the German state will not return her child. In Germany, the law provides that the state also has rights over the child by granting them free access to education and other public services.”

Romania adapts

What happened in the European Parliament with this vote is unbelievable, because most MEPs are parents, says Marius Tudor. He points out that the policy of state abuse of parents already exists in Austria, Germany and the Nordic countries, and now it seems that with this monitoring for children in Romania, which is a milestone in the NRP, they are trying to address the “problem” in our country.

“Under the pretext of prevention, most children in Romania are at risk of being separated from their families, because many Romanians are poor, many have gone abroad, with or without children. In the Child Monitoring’s draft law, there is a paragraph that states that a child who has migrated for more than a year can be separated from its family. If you, the state, were not able to lift the Romanian children out of poverty, do you now want to pass a law that will take them away from me? Why, actually? Did you fight with them? Did you dress them, put shoes on them? Or do you have enough financial resources now to take care of them while you have not been able to so for decades? They actually follow orders. On the initiative of a USR (Save Romania Union) deputy, now Reper (Renewing Romania’s European Project), the EU-wide child guarantee was passed last year. Part of that guarantee is the Child Monitoring approach, which gathers all children in different difficult situations into one database,” said Councilor Marius Tudor.

Continue reading

Pope Francis Promotes the Great Replacement

In the following excerpt from a recent interview, Pope Francis argues for increased immigration to compensate for the fact that Europeans are not having enough children.

Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

How Bad is Your Batch?

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this German-language article from Report24:

Particularly deadly vaccine batches were injected less often — who knew?

A study from Denmark shows: Individual batches of Pfizer’s so-called “Covid-19 vaccine” Comirnaty (BNT162b2) have a particularly problematic safety profile. This is due to the accumulation of severe side effects. The differences with less problematic batches are statistically extremely significant. Under normal circumstances, the mere fact that these variations exist would be a warning sign and reason for a recall of the product. But worse: there seem to be accomplices.

The study, which has criminality potential, can be found under the name “Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine”. The scientists involved are the Danes Max Schmeling, Vibeke Manniche and Peter Riis Hansen.

First of all, it should be noted that in Europe alone, as of November 11, 2022, there have been 971,021 reports of serious adverse events. The approach of the investigation briefly explained:

Not least with regard to the emergency market approval and the rapid implementation of large-scale vaccination programs, however, the possibility of a batch-dependent variation seems worthy of investigation.

Study “Batch-dependent Safety of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine”

The investigation deals with the side effect reports in Denmark from December 27, 2020 to January 11, 2022. These are recorded in the state safety database DKMA and classified according to severity. The batch number is also saved there with the suspicious activity reports. Classifications include: Non-serious, severe (involving hospitalization, life-threatening illness, permanent disability, or congenital malformation), and death.

A total of 7,835,280 doses were administered to 3,748,215 subjects using 52 different BNT162b2 vaccine batches (2,340-814,320 doses per batch) and 43,496 serious adverse reactions were recorded in 13,635 subjects.

A total of 66,587 side effects were spread across 52 batches, meaning that when multiple doses were administered, individuals suffered and severe side effects were recorded each time.

The evaluation of this data made it possible, after excluding all reports without batch numbers, to assign 61,847 reported serious side effects to the respective batches. Of the serious side effects, 14,509 (23.5%) were classified as serious and 579 (0.9%) as fatal.

Result indicates complicity

The scientists would have expected that the vaccine “quality” would be largely identical in all batches and that the occurrence of side effects would therefore be equally distributed. This would also be expected from a properly approved and tested active substance. The result was all the more surprising.

However, the number of serious side effects reported varied significantly between batches of the vaccine, ranging from 0.09 to 3.59 per 1,000 doses administered. This difference is dramatic and can only be explained by extremely different vaccine quality.

Continue reading

Giorgia Meloni: Fast-Track Ukraine Into the EU

In the following video recorded at a conference in Rome on Wednesday, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni promotes the rapid assimilation of Ukraine into the European Union.

Ms. Meloni’s position puts her at odds with a substantial portion of her fellow Italians, among them Silvio Berlusconi and other members of her government. Italian public opinion is, generally speaking, pro-Russian.

One may speculate about the prime minister’s reasons for pushing Ukrainian membership in the EU and lionizing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. She’s an intelligent woman, and must surely realize that Mr. Zelensky is an American puppet. Perhaps she wants to curry favor with the USA. Or maybe there are Italian commercial interests lobbying for Ukraine — who knows?

The resistance to the globalist Left isn’t monolithic. To take another example, Donald Trump is still promoting the vax. And Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán imposed a strict lockdown during the “pandemic”. I don’t often encounter fellow dissidents whose positions are in exact alignment with mine.

Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Below are excerpts from an English-language article in Remix News (hat tip Reader from Chicago) about Ms. Meloni’s remarks:

Meloni Urges EU to Speed Up Accession Talks With Ukraine

Speaking at a conference in Rome on Wednesday, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni called on European allies to start accession negotiations with Ukraine as soon as possible.

In a joint statement with Ukrainian Prime Minister Denis Shmihal, the Italian prime minister underlined that Ukraine’s future must be shaped in such a way that it can increasingly adapt to European dynamics and institutions.

“The smartest way to thank the Ukrainians for what they are doing is to accelerate their chances to participate in European institutions,” the Italian leader said. “We must acknowledge the enormous efforts made by Kyiv to reform its system and bring it more in line with the European Commission’s requirements.”

She added that Italy wants to play a leading role in the reconstruction of Ukraine.

Video transcript:

Continue reading