Silvia Sardone is an Italian MEP for the Lega (Matteo Salvini’s party). In the following video, Ms. Sardone points out the destructive absurdities of the “Green Deal” climate policies which are the current collective obsession of the European Union.
Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:
Video transcript:
It looks like Hungary, like other Western countries, is going to host it share of Chinese police stations. Our Hungarian correspondent László sends this report.
The Curious Case of the Chinese-Hungarian Law Enforcement Summit
by László
“Chinese-Hungarian Law Enforcement Summit”?!
Astonishing. And ominous.
I mean, what the yellow-red hell?!
The Minister of the Interior isn’t supposed to be… interior?
“During the official meeting with his Chinese partner on 16 February 2024 in Budapest, Minister of the Interior Dr. Sándor Pintér stressed that the cooperation between the two countries is based on the guarantee of security and stability […]”
I could find no further information on what exactly it all means (which is strange in itself), so I can only guess… Nothing good for liberty, for sure — especially for Chinese expats.
“The two leaders signed agreements on strengthening law enforcement cooperation and joint patrols.”
Huh? Does it mean Chinese policemen in Hungary?
I’m quickly sending this last S.O.S. message before my Covid card turns red and my internet access gets blocked. Food donations are welcome, as Chinese AI systems won’t allow me and my family to do the grocery shopping, as soon as this letter gets published.
OK, for the time being that’s a joke — but how long before it isn’t?
Translation of the announcement published on the official website of the Hungarian government:
Chinese-Hungarian Law Enforcement Summit
The State Councilor of the People’s Republic of China, Minister of Public Security Wang Xiaohong, paid his first official visit to Hungary after the Chinese New Year.
During the official meeting with his Chinese partner on 16 February 2024 in Budapest, Minister of the Interior Dr. Sándor Pintér stressed that the cooperation between the two countries is based on the guarantee of security and stability, which are essential for the establishment and further development of comprehensive strategic cooperation.
With the visit of State Councillor Wang Xiaohong, the parties took an important step towards the development of relations between the Ministry of Public Security of the People’s Republic of China and the Ministry of the Interior of Hungary. The two leaders signed agreements on strengthening law enforcement cooperation and joint patrols.
During his visit to Hungary, the Chinese Minister of Public Security, among other things, familiarized himself with the structure and capabilities of the Hungarian counter-terrorism service and inspected the construction works of the Budapest-Belgrade railway line.
Rob Roos is a Dutch politician who formerly represented FvD (Forum for Democracy) and then the party JA21 (Right Answer 21) in the European Parliament. He is now an independent. In the following video Mr. Roos speaks in the EP in Strasbourg about the EU’s attempt to censor Elon Musk’s platform X (formerly Twitter).
Many thanks to the anonymous translator, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:
Video transcript:
Jews are being beaten up in German universities. No, this isn’t 1935. And this time the globalist oligarchs that rule Germany and the rest of Western Europe have imported the legions of Mohammed to do their dirty work and teach Israel (and Jews in general) a lesson.
Many thanks to Brunhilde for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:
Video transcript:
The following video shows remarks made by a local politician for the FvD (Forum voor Democratie, Forum for Democracy) at a city council meeting in The Hague.
Here’s part of the introduction from RAIR Foundation:
Dutch politician Massimo Etalle from the Forum for Democracy party warned of the consequences of an ‘insane anti-Dutch policy,’ emphasizing the financial strain with ‘a gigantic tax burden of 60%’ to finance a ‘migrant resort,’ and lamented the loss of ‘centuries-old families’ due to government choices.
In a recent session at the Dutch city council of Den Haag (The Hague), a charged debate erupted over the issue of illegal immigration, igniting strong sentiments among political factions.
The discussion was instigated by concerns surrounding a new law mandating Den Haag to accommodate a significantly more significant number of asylum seekers, a decision met with widespread discontent among politicians and citizens alike.
Many thanks to Henk for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:
Video transcript:
As expected, the negotiations for a new Dutch government have hit an iceberg. Our Dutch correspondent H. Numan sends some educated guesses about what might lie ahead.
Between a rock and hard place
by H. Numan
The formation of a new cabinet in The Netherlands is dead in the water. Mr. Pieter Omtzigt walked out, for the flimsiest of reasons: he didn’t think the budget would be handled properly by the new cabinet. Nobody believes him. His party tanked from 20 seats to 11 seats in the subsequent poll. He still wants to support a PVV cabinet, but only as a minority government. What’s going to happen now is anyone’s guess.
I told you we have a pretty clear electoral result: it’s going to be either a somewhat conservative government led by the PVV, or an extreme left-wing cabinet led by the PvdA-GL. No other combinations are realistic.
Mr. Omtzigt’s suggestion for a minority cabinet is ludicrous. Most people don’t believe him anymore, if only for that flimsy excuse. Supposing Wilders were to go for that option, his cabinet wouldn’t last long. Omtzigt would blow it up on the first possible opportunity, no matter how minute, trivial or outright silly the issue might be. Wilders is the longest-serving politician in Parliament, so he knows that, too.
I had my doubts about Mr. Omtzigt, and told you many times about them. For those who don’t know: Pieter Omtzigt was a CDA politician; in that party he held two positions. He was their no. 2 man, and enfant terrible. All politicians are actors. Some are better than others, but they all are. Wilders, for example, stands out because of his hairstyle. That’s his trademark. His nickname is Blondie or Mozart.
Omtzigt played the role of a very conscientious hard-working politician (that he is), selfishly working for the betterment of the country and his party (bull crap). He led several investigations that didn’t make him a lot of friends in his party. The shooting down of the Malaysian Airlines MH 17 affair he investigated, and presented a report that was controversial for the government. Part of that government was his CDA party. He correctly placed most of the blame on Russia, something that the government rather wanted to ignore, but couldn’t after his investigation. Another investigation was the Childcare Scandal. This caused the collapse of the previous government, in which his own party CDA was a coalition partner.
As he was number two in the party, there were only two ways his career could go: up or out. Either he would become the next CDA leader or he would step out of the party. CDA leadership knew he was hugely popular, so they rigged the leadership elections. Not once, but twice. Just to keep him from the no. 1 spot. Had they elected him as the new leader, we’d have a CDA government right now. Instead they opted for a campaign of gossip, slander and innuendo that drove him out of the party after a nervous breakdown. The once almighty CDA has now shriveled to a mere fringe party.
At the time, I wondered why they preferred oblivion. His recent actions told me why. This man is a loose cannon. Uncontrollable, and worse: unreasonable. He knows everything, and you have to do exactly as he wants. If not, he throws a temper tantrum and has a nervous breakdown until he gets his way. However, there is more. Omtzigt is a wobbler. His favorite game is the yes-no game. That goes for most politicians, but he excels in it. He doesn’t want to say yes, because that would alienate some voters, but also he doesn’t want to say no, in fear of losing other voters. He is a guy sitting eternally on the fence.
He also fears responsibility. One of the reasons why he didn’t win the elections was that he openly said he didn’t want to become the next PM, without telling us who his candidate for PM would be. Only on the very last moment (mere days before the elections) did he decide to accept that position after all, but the damage was done. It played a big part why his party ended in third place. A lot of people, myself included, say: if you don’t want to become prime minister, why set up your own party?
The German government is recruiting “skilled” Nigerians for immigration into Germany. Even if Nigeria has a large pool of skilled workers of that caliber — which seems doubtful — siphoning them off for careers in Germany will further impoverish Nigeria by leaching it of vital talent. Why is that considered a good thing?
Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Apollo News. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:
Development Minister Schulze wants to bring Nigerian “skilled workers” to Germany
Federal Minister Schulze (SPD) is currently in Nigeria to bring skilled workers from the West African country to Germany. During her visit she opened the fourth center, which is intended to make it easier for people to enter Germany.
Federal Development Minister Svenja Schulze is in Nigeria to recruit skilled workers from the West African country. During her visit, the SPD politician opened the fourth center of the German Society for International Cooperation (GIZ), which is intended to make it easier for people to enter and find a job in Germany. “We want to make migration a success for everyone involved,” said Schulze during the opening of the Migrant Resource Center in Nyanya, a suburb of the capital Abuja.
The head of GIZ, Sandra Vermeuijten, shows that the project is apparently well received in Nigeria. “Even before it opened, a lot of people wanted to come in,” she said. “That sounds like great hope for many people here. From now on I expect a tsunami,” shouted Vermeuijten during the opening ceremony, referring to the crowds that are now likely to head to Germany. [I doubt I’ve ever seen so much HATE against their own people from any government in the history of “civilization”.]
There are already three advice centers in Nigeria that are financed by German development funds. [a.k.a. the German taxpayers, who are forced to pay for their own demise.] These centers have so far offered support to returnees who have been deported from Germany, for example, to help them reintegrate. These centers also provided information about the dangers of illegal migration.
But there is a change in focus. “Here people can learn something about legal routes to Germany,” explains the minister. Now these centers, which initially warned about the dangers of illegal migration, are now supposed to show you ways to come to Germany legally.
Afterword from the translator:
The following video from the AUF1 TV channel in Germany discusses the recently concluded conference hosted by the World Economic Forum in Davos. The topic in focus is “public-private partnerships”, where gigantic global corporations get their financial tentacles into the affairs of formerly sovereign states.
Many thanks to Oz-Rita for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:
Video transcript:
German schools should serve as the alembic in which the multicultural society will be distilled. Such is the opinion of a “German” diversity expert and lobbyist for multiculti ideals — who just happens to be a Syrian. What a surprise!
Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the Austrian portal Heimatkurier. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:
German schools as “multicultural laboratories”? How the migration lobby is building pressure
According to Aladin El-Mafaalani, foreign school classes should be supported and adapted to the “requirements of a migration society”. What the Syrian-born “education expert” means by this is the suppression of the local culture in favour of a multi-minority utopia. For migration lobbyists, re-education in childhood is an important step towards abolishing German identity.
With his demands, the professor of education, who is active in “racism research” among other things, is in the same vein as many other people in the Federal Republic of Germany’s cultural and political establishment: the fact of a civilization in exchange serves as a justification for the acceleration and deepening of the process. Fortunately, the impudence with which migrants interfere in the interests of the German people is increasingly meeting with resistance, as the Federal Government’s “Anti-Racism Commissioner” has discovered. El-Mafaalani, on the other hand, is still allowed to express his even more questionable views on school policy in several questionable media outlets without being contradicted.
The typical elementary school in the colorful republic
“Up to fifty countries of origin and more than twenty languages,” is how he paints the picture of a modern primary school, and he’s actually not wrong. Particularly in the younger age cohorts, population exchange has devastating consequences that are noticeable in the education sector. The current PISA study provides alarming evidence of foreign infiltration in the education system, as the Heimatkurier reported. However, El-Mafaalani does not conclude that this is the appropriate start to a major remigration campaign, but rather something completely different. He told the Evangelical Press Service: “Schools should actually be the laboratory of our society in which we work on and solve the challenges of the migration society.” [I guess what he really wants to do is turn the education system into a massive madrassa.]
Variety and diversity — the language of the migrant lobby
The so-called educational researcher is concerned with nothing other than a radical restructuring of kindergartens and primary schools. Instead of a dominant culture and German educational canons, social workers, psychologists and “cultural therapists” should determine everyday school life. He sees the need for action as a result of “diversity”, without explaining in more detail what the “problems” that need to be avoided are. A typical tactic of multicultural apologists is the use of vague, feel-good words and the distraction from the causes of the problem to the invocation of supposed expert opinions. The goal is always the same: to undermine the ethno-cultural identity of the host country.
Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Apollo News. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:
German flags banned at large demonstration “against the right”
Hundreds of thousands take to the streets in Berlin “against the right”. German flags are banned — and the organizers reveal that the bottom line is that they simply want to demonstrate for left-wing politics.
Hundreds of thousands of people demonstrated “against the right” at the Reichstag in Berlin on Saturday. The organizers spoke of around 300,000 participants. 100,000 people registered. The demonstrators on the grounds in front of the Reichstag building shouted “All together against fascism” and “All of Berlin is stopping the AfD”. Slogans such as “No room for racism” could be read on posters. Many of the chants and posters were specifically directed against the AfD and its representatives. The demonstration is inspired by a manufactured report by “Correctiv” about an allegedly racist “secret meeting” in Potsdam. Following the rally on the lawn in front of the Reichstag building, a human chain is planned as a symbolic “firewall” around the Bundestag.
But anyone who wants to demonstrate with black, red and gold in front of the “heart of democracy” is not welcome there: national flags are “expressly forbidden,” report observers of the demonstration. It is said that this was announced several times by the organizers.
Demo for the left — and against Germany?
Chancellor Olaf Scholz described this weekend’s demonstrations as a “strong signal” for democracy and the Basic Law. The fact that the flag of democracy and the Basic Law — black, red and gold — is undesirable at these demos raises doubts about this representation. In the past, there were already bans at demonstrations “against the right” in Germany: black-red-gold flags were unwelcome there and, if not banned, then generally ostracized and frowned upon. A demonstrator who wanted to sing the national anthem of the Federal Republic of Germany was forcibly removed from the stage amid loud boos.
According to the organizers, the demo is open to everyone: “Everyone who wants to stand against the shift to the right in society, against fascism and right-wing extremism is welcome,” says Tareq Alaows, refugee policy spokesman for Pro Asyl and co-founder of the “Hand in Hand” alliance who organized the protest. But then he reveals that it is by no means just about the AfD. The protest is also directed against other parties: “Right-wing extremism cannot be combated by everyone moving to the right.”
Democratic parties supported this border shift, for example by restricting the rights of “refugees”. The migration lobbyist Alaows reveals: At these demos it is not just the AfD, but every form of conservative politics that is the enemy. In the end, this Saturday too, the demonstration will not be “against the right”, but rather for left-wing politics. [This guy uses taqiyya very aptly, because these idiots don’t even notice that it’s all about enslavement and Dar al-Islam.]
Afterword from the translator:
Érik Tegnér is the editor of the French identitarian weekly Livre Noir. In the following video from the Canary Islands, parts of which had to be recorded surreptitiously, Mr. Tegnér uses statistical data to deduce the staggering costs of importing all those thousands of Africans into the EU — costs that are ultimately borne by the European taxpayer.
Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:
Video transcript:
The following video features remarks made by Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico to his country’s parliament. As far as I know, this represents the first time any head of a Western government has called out the corrupt predatory practices of governments in symbiosis with the pharmaceutical industry during the COVID-19 “pandemic”. He even highlights the corrupt relationship between Pfizer and Ursula von der Leyen, the current president of the European Commission. For his sake, I hope he has a food taster on his staff.
The subtitles were timed using the official English translation of Mr. Fico’s remarks. Many thanks to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:
Video transcript:
The Deep State oligarchs who manage the European Union are absolutely determined that the serfs, peons, and other Untermenschen of Europe must be silenced by any means necessary. Those ignorant yokels have no business meddling in affairs of state, which must be left to their betters to run as they see fit — and all for the good of the “people”, of course.
Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the Austrian portal Heimatkurier. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:
EU censorship law: “Hate speech” on a par with terrorism and human trafficking
Through a resolution by the EU Parliament, laws against “hate speech” are to be introduced in all EU countries. But the ostensible “fight against hate” aims to censor and suppress the political opposition and its supporters. At this year’s WEF meeting in Davos, resolutions were also passed to massively expand censorship. On January 18, the EU Parliament passed a new law that makes so-called “hate speech” a crime throughout the EU.
The vote was clear in the left-center dominated parliament: 397 yes votes, 121 no votes and 26 abstentions.
“Hate speech” is equated with terrorism
The decision puts so-called “hate speech” on the EU crime list. This allows the European Commission to introduce binding legislation and penalties for all member states. The list actually only includes crimes that have a “cross-border interest” in combating them, such as terrorism, human trafficking or cartel crime. This puts people who post politically unpleasant content on the Internet on the same level as terrorists and drug cartel gangsters. The EU has already threatened social media platforms with sanctions and regulations. [And that comes out of the mouth from one of the biggest terrorist and human trafficking organizations on the planet and against their own people. Go figure.]
“Hate speech”: A vague definition
This massive expansion of thought paragraphs serves the sole purpose of persecuting politically disapproved people and opinions. The official statement already gives an idea of these intentions. It is said that hate speech is “a danger to society as a whole because it undermines the foundations of the EU”. The definition of alleged hate crimes is up in the air and can be interpreted in any way. Basically, anything that a person perceives as offensive or hurtful may be interpreted as hate speech and can therefore soon be charged. There are no clear definitions or control bodies. [That’s the whole point with these so-called LAWS. They are not designed to protect the people, but rather the parasites in politics and society.]
Will gender criticism soon lead to a stretch in prison?
According to the current definition, “criminal discrimination” refers to the alleged denigration of origin, ethnicity or religion. However, left-liberal law makers want to massively expand this definition because, in their eyes, it is no longer up-to-date. In the future, any alleged discrimination against sexuality, sex and gender characteristics, trans identities as well as age and disability would also constitute a criminal offense. It is impossible to predict who will be targeted by the muzzle paragraph. This may affect people who criticize the adoption rights for homosexuals as well as critics of drag queen reading lessons in kindergartens.
The two videos below discuss the remarks made by a former French intelligence agent, who has sparked a controversy with his statements about the inevitable Islamization of France, and all of Europe.
RAIR Foundation provides this background for the videos:
Former DGSE (General Directorate for External Security) agent Pierre Martinet, who served in a specialized French intelligence agency, delivered a chilling warning about the impending Islamic threat to Europe in an interview on the Les Bâtisseurs podcast.
Martinet, a veteran of the 3rd Marine Infantry Parachute Regiment (3e RPIMa), foresees a terrifying future where Europe faces complete Islamization within the next 50-70 years. The portion of the interview presented below unravels the profound ideological threat posed by Islam, particularly the role of the Muslim Brotherhood, in the unsettling transformation of Europe. Watch the video, which has been translated into English by RAIR Foundation USA, to gain a deep understanding of this alarming prediction and the urgent threat it raises.
Many thanks to HeHa for the translations, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling.
The first video shows excerpts from the TV interview Mr. Martinet:
center>
The second video features a panel discussion on the topic from French television:
Video transcript #1: