Three Cultural Enrichment Tales From Germany

Below are three articles that highlight the latest mischievous high jinks of exuberant young culture-enrichers in Germany, all translated by Hellequin GB.

The first article reports on the German government’s imminent release from prison of more than thirty Islamic terrorists.

From Die Welt:

More than thirty Islamists are about to be released in Germany

In the coming months, an exceptionally high number of criminals who are being held in German prisons for crimes related to Islamist-motivated terrorism will be released. This worries the security authorities.

German authorities are preparing for the release of more than thirty Islamists this year. Specifically, the Federal Ministry of Justice has knowledge of “fifteen to twenty people” who are currently in German prisons for acts in the area of Islamist-motivated terrorism and are expected to be released in 2022. This was announced by a spokeswoman at the request of Welt am Sonntag.

In addition, there are eighteen other people from the “phenomenon of Islamism or suspicion” who are currently under special surveillance by the law enforcement authorities and are also to be released this year. The release of extremists is often a concern for security authorities. Some inmates have become further radicalized behind bars — and strike shortly after the end of their incarceration.

The Ministry of Justice does not yet have an overview of right-wing and left-wing extremists who are about to be released. In the past few years, only the numbers of affected Islamists behind bars have been statistically recorded, the spokeswoman said. However, an expanded questionnaire on the numbers from right-wing and left-wing extremism was sent to the federal states in November 2021. Results should be available soon.

Afterword from the translator:

Thirty detention cells will soon be free, which creates space for vaccine refusers who do not want to or cannot pay the fines imposed should vaccination become compulsory. After all, these people are the real ENEMIES of the state.

And the lovely German interior minister, Nancy Faeser, is meticulously focused on the country’s greatest threat — right-wing extremism, which must be fought on all fronts and at all costs. A home secretary can’t take care of all extremist groups equally. You have to set a priority, and that’s what she seems to be busy with, considering the first few weeks of her tenure.

The second article describes horrific knife attacks by a man impersonating a postman. We know he’s a culture-enricher, because he spoke broken German, although he was said to look like an “Eastern European”. That description does not preclude the possibility that he was a Kosovar or a Chechen, however. And not all Maghrebians look “Southern”, so jihad cannot be ruled out.

From Hamburger Morgenpost:

Continue reading

Time to Brush the Wool Away, Boris

Michael Copeland directed the following remarks at the UK’s clown prime minister back before he was PM, when he was just the clown mayor of London.

Time to Brush the Wool Away, Boris

by Michael Copeland

(First published at LibertyGB in March 2014, long before Johnson was Prime Minister)

Boris Johnson is having the wool pulled over his eyes with a red herring past its sell-by date. So are Cameron and the team. We have heard it before: this PR “spin” is old hat, a distraction, but it is what they want to hear, so they love it. Enter on stage the impressive-sounding Islamic Heritage Research Foundation. Hear the reassuring purring of its executive director, Irfan Alawi:

“Moderate, traditional, spiritual, and even conservative British Muslims … should … support effective measures to curb the spread of extremist ideology.”

How fine this sounds: it is the comforting sound-bite, feeding the wishful notion of the Nice Peaceful Moderate in contrast with the problematical “extremist Islamist”. Remember that the previously attempted “effective measures” consisted of paying money to mosques, and they proved ineffective. The soothing spin rests on the deliberately dishonest distinction between an allegedly nice, kind, peaceful Islam and a violent, problematic, dangerous “extremist Islamism”. This has been lapped up by the government, but it is bogus. It is deception. No sin is committed, though: lying to the kuffar is “halal”, allowed, in Islam. It has a name, taqiyya, and a section (r8), “Permissible Lying”, in the Manual of Islamic Law, Reliance of the Traveller.

A “moderate” Islam? No. “These terms are ugly and offensive”, said Tayyip Recep Erdogan, observant Muslim Prime Minister of Turkey, “There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that is all there is to it.” There are moderate Muslims, yes. They are like that, though, in spite of Islam, not because of it. The only way to be “moderate” is to be partially observant. The fully observant observe the command to kill: that is not moderate. Where is this? The Koran has the answer.

The instructions in the Koran express ordinary basic Islam’s core, “radical” (from Latin radix, root) ideology. In over a hundred verses the Koran mandates violence against non-Muslims ( One example is in chapter 9, Sura At-Tawba, the one cited by the Woolwich killer, “Kill unbelievers wherever you meet them” (v.5). There is only one interpretation available of “kill”. Under Islam’s doctrine of “abrogation” Chapter 9, being the latest complete chapter chronologically, overrides and “abrogates” all the peaceful verses elsewhere. “The verses of forgiveness”, wrote ancient scholar Mohammad As-Shawkani, “are abrogated by the obligation of fighting”. The Arabic word artfully translated as “fighting” entails fighting to the death, killing, explains the Arabic-speaker Ashraf Ramelah, of Voice of the Copts. Hear the Grand Mufti of Egypt, Ali Gomaa, Sunni Islam’s highest authority, “Muslims must kill non-Muslims wherever they meet them, unless they convert to Islam”. There we have it — from the horse’s mouth. The ordinary basic ideology in the Koran is extremist and mandates violence.

Muslims are eager to protest that the context of the Koran is important. Here it is: Islam instructs that the Koran is “true, …universal and trans-time” (Ahmad Saad, North London Central Mosque) and “valid from eternity to eternity” (Sam Solomon, former professor of Sharia law). It forms part of Islamic law, and announces: “None may change his words” (18:27). For denying any verse there is the death penalty, which can be carried out lawfully by anyone, “since it is killing someone who deserves to die” (Manual of Islamic Law, o8.7(7), o8.4).

Continue reading

Wannabe Taliban Mujahid Busted in Italy

This report from late last month describes a terror bust in Italy in which a Pakistani culture-enricher was arrested. Note that the poor misguided man was already under a deportation order, and was awaiting expulsion.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from Il Giornale:

“Instigated attacks” — 31-year-old Pakistani arrested at Bari

December 28, 2021

Subject to an expulsion order in August, in recent months the Pakistani had followed a process of “auto-radicalization”

by Francesca Galici

Another anti-terror operation in Italy. A 31-year-old Pakistani was arrested by the Special Operative Group of the Carabinieri on the orders of the District Anti-Mafia and Anti-Terrorism prosecutor of Aquila. The arrest occurred on December 15 and was validated. The investigating judge of Aquila, at the request of the prosecutor’s office, has issued the order of precautionary custody against Arslan Faiz, accused of instigation to commit a crime, aggravated by the purpose of terrorism.

The man has lived for some time at Francavilla al Mare, in the province of Chieti, where he is employed as a car washer. On August 18 he had been issued an deportation notice for order and public security, which had been issued by the prefect of Chieti. The Pakistani was awaiting the execution of the forced repatriation, but for reasons of national security, the arrest was made. According to the investigation, there was a rapid and intense process of Islamic “auto-radicalization” of the Pakistani, which had taken on extremist aspects of a Salafist nature.

And it was this last aspect that forced the investigators to take the final investigative activity regarding Faiz. A correct intuition on the part of the police, who succeeded in documenting a continuous activity of apologist activity, via Facebook, consisting of postings and comments in favor of terrorist methods and the victories of the Taliban militias. It also emerged from the investigations that Faiz allegedly forwarded videos and frames of jihadist propaganda via WhatsApp. This indicated an explicit activity of instigation to commit crimes of participation and associations with the aim of terrorism and terrorist attacks, which then led to his arrest.

The man’s telephone was tapped, and it emerged that Faiz was communicating in the Urdu language with his co-nationalists, those living in Italy and Pakistan, attempting to influence them in a radical direction, posting laudatory images of the Taliban, and in particular, the terror organization, Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). In addition, in his phone, which had been previously seized, were found several videos and photographs, some of which were also posted and shared on social media, of training camps in Afghanistan, armed militiamen, and effigies of Osama bin Laden and Taliban leaders.

Arslan Faiz used overtly laudatory tones regarding the jihadist organizations, also explicitly inviting martyrdom against the “infidels”. Now the man will have to wait to be judged by a tribunal, which will have to establish eventual criminal charges against him in respect to the accusation brought by the District Anti-Mafia prosecutor.

A Lytic Agent Acting to Dissolve Western Culture

On Friday I wrote about the latest ukase from the bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Southern Virginia, which once again orders parishes to shut down church services, this time because of the Omicron variant.

Paul Ashley asked the following question in the comments:

How will the diocese punish a parish for simply ignoring their pathetic and cowardly edict?

While formulating an answer, I started thinking about the larger issues. Below is an adapted and expanded version of my response.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

They can’t call in the state police to arrest people. They don’t have a Swiss Guard. Their only leverage is that ultimately they own the church real estate.

They could commence a legal process to return the plant to direct diocesan control, and evict the heretics. But that would be very expensive and time-consuming, and they could not be certain of success. As far as I know, there is nothing in the canons of the national church that grants the bishop the authority to exercise such dictatorial control over the parishes. She has arrogated unto herself powers the ECUSA doesn’t grant her.

Furthermore, the case would be litigated in the civil courts, which may not be all that interested in what the diocese thinks are its inherent powers.

That’s why I argued, during the heated discussion that preceded the breakup of our church, that we should flip the bird to the bishop and continue to hold services as the congregation saw fit. The vestry, however, had been fully assimilated into the Covid Borg, and voted to obey the bishop. That caused a schism — we, the unassimilated, were in the majority, but it made no difference. So we formed a dissident congregation that meets in a private home. The priest and the organist are part of our little group.

The rump, so to speak, of the original congregation consists of obedient masked and jabbed people who are deathly afraid of Corona. They do what the bishop tells them, and shut down when commanded. I think there are four or maybe five of them.

There were also several people who quit attending church of any sort as a result of the toxic conflict over the issue. They have withdrawn completely.

That’s what Covid did to my little church — it destroyed it. And I’m paranoid enough to believe that was one of the purposes of it.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

For the last fifty years or so, the globalists that aim to create the New World Order have been employing various strategies to introduce what I call lytic agents into Western culture. The purpose is to break it down into smaller and smaller parts, to dissolve the traditional social order.

For decades the principal lytic agent employed was mass immigration, and especially Muslim immigration. That’s why this blog was founded more than seventeen years ago, to agitate against that process.

The Powers That Be had evidently observed what happens in places like Nigeria when the percentage of Muslims in the population passes a tipping point. The old social structures are gradually destroyed, sharia law is implemented, and from then on the Prophet PBUH rules with an iron fist.

The average Muslim in existing Islamic societies is not all that bright, and has a volatile temperament. This renders him susceptible to manipulation and control by Islamic despots, which for centuries has been the typical political arrangement in Muslim countries.

I can only assume that the globalists have calculated that they can do the same thing with the newly-Islamized cultures of the West, once the existing order has been thoroughly dissolved. Heck, they might even convert — what difference would it make? They don’t have to believe all that stuff, and the despots in charge don’t have to follow the rules; they can drink and smoke all they like, so long as they’re out of the public eye. And, as a further inducement, the men at the top of the pyramid get to keep large harems of nubile females (or catamites, if that’s more to their taste). As for the women — well, they’ll be out of luck. But progressive chicks don’t seem to have caught on to that fact yet.

As of 2020, however, Islam as a favored lytic agent has been exchanged for SARS-CoV-2. The NWO folks seemed to have determined that it has a superior capability to destroy traditional Western culture, and have pulled out all the stops to make it do just that.

Christianity, even in these degraded times, is the strongest bastion of Western culture, especially here in the United States. The earlier socialist-communist infiltration of the mainstream denominations comes in handy now — the leadership of the organized churches can implement policies that have the effect of destroying their institutions as functioning entities, driving out members who really believe in God and the mission of Jesus Christ. Those left behind in the shells of the churches are obedient drones, functionally indistinguishable from the apparatchiks who occupy the academy, the media, the government, and other major institutions. The institutional Church will become a walking corpse.

If my little dissident congregation is any indication of the larger processes at work, real Christianity — the vital, active force that has existed continuously for two thousand years — will be driven underground, and persecuted when it dares to show its face in public.

And that’s a hopeful sign, because Christianity thrives under persecution. That’s why it is spreading so widely in China.

Call to Remove Geert Wilders’ Security Detail

Ever since Theo van Gogh was assassinated in 2004, Geert Wilders has lived under continuous security protection provided by the Dutch state. Because Mr. Wilders dares to say things the establishment disapproves of, various lefties have occasionally called for the removal of his security detail as a way to silence the annoying nationalist politician.

Below is an op-ed about the latest proposal to expose Geert Wilders to the tender mercies of the Great Jihad. Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from De Dagelijkse Standaard:

Paul Cliteur Column: The Removal of Security for Geert Wilders

One of the recurring themes around Salman Rushdie or, in the Netherlands, Geert Wilders, is their public security. Rushdie and Wilders must be protected against jihadist murderers due to the things they have said about Islam. Jihadists conclude from criticism or satire of Islam that these critics must be killed. After all, whoever insults God deserves the death penalty. If the death penalty is not imposed by the State, then the believers should “assume their responsibility.”

Khomeini urged this against Rushdie in 1989, and with some regularity, people also in the Netherlands have been arrested with the mission of silencing Geert Wilders via a murder assignment.

Some people find the above sober presentation of the facts intolerable. They don’t want to focus on the murder contract, rather on what is said by the intended victim. Was that really necessary? Such a satirical fiction writing about the early history of Islam? You surely know that jihadists don’t like it, right? Are you not bringing difficulties upon yourself? You don’t go and stand on a tiger’s tail, do you?

Concerning Rushdie, the noise has perhaps now been muted, but concerning Wilders, you still hear it. Wout Willemsen writes in De Dagelijkse Standaard on D66 (party member) Hans J.C. van Leen, who announced on Twitter after a statement by Wilders: “Let us initiate an action that the security of this un-Dutch man be immediately lifted.”

Immediate lifting of security. With the result that Wilders can, indeed, be murdered by the next Junaid I. Van Veen also has impressive predecessors. H.J. A. Hofland (1927-2016), on a Pauw & Witteman program [talk show] in 2008, suggested the most obvious way to silence Wilders would be to stop his security. After all, Wilders puts “lives in danger”. He supposedly does things that are in conflict with “Dutch interests”. “Start lifting his personal security,” Hofland advised.

But for some, even that was not enough. Former police chief Joop Van Riessen (born 1943) speculated in 2007 about letting him “rot”. He would not “fit” into a new society that we are building together.

Hofland probably does not look down with approval from Journalist Heaven on his own advice from 2008. Perhaps, Joop van Riessen is deradicalized. Let us hope that Van Veen has also come to his senses.

— Prof. Dr. Paul Cliteur is a professor in Leiden (University) and author of, among others, “The State vs. Geert Wilders”.

“Radical” Preaching in the Great Mosque of Beauvais

Last week I posted a translated article about the Great Mosque of Beauvais, which has been closed by the French authorities due to the “radical” preaching of one of its imams.

As Michael Copeland has frequently pointed out, “radical” Islamic teachings simply reflect the rigorous application of mainstream Islamic doctrine as codified in the Sharia.

Below is a video report on the topic of the Beauvais mosque from a French TV news program. Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

A Forced Sabbatical for the Great Mosque of Beauvais

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from Le Monde:

The prefecture of l’Oise orders the temporary closing of the Great Mosque of Beauvais

The religious establishment will be closed for 6 months due to sermons “inciting hate”, “ violence”, and “defending jihad.”

December 28, 2021

The prefecture of l’Oise has ordered the closure of the Great Mosque of Beauvais for 6 months, specifically due to sermons “inciting hate”, “violence”, and “promoting jihad”, it announced Tuesday, December 28.

“The prefecture of l’Oise has issued a decree Monday for the closure of the Grand Mosque of Beauvais for 6 months. This decree is enforceable after 48 hours,” stated the prefecture. This religious site serves some 400 faithful.

The association Hope and Brotherhood, which operates the mosque, deplored an “unjust and unjustified decision,” because it “shows, by all evidence, a will to harm the Muslim community by highlighting some elements taken out of their context and thus, deprive hundreds of the faithful,” of a religious site. Samim Bolaky, the association’s lawyer, announced to Agence France Press that he had petitioned the administrative court of Amiens for a temporary injunction against this decision. A hearing must take place within 48 hours, according to the lawyer.

On December 14, Minister of the Interior Gerald Darmanin announced that the procedure of administrative closure of this mosque had been initiated — because of, according to him, the radicalism of the sermons. “We have initiated the closure of the Beauvais mosque, which is completely unacceptable, which attacks Christians, homosexuals, Jews,” the minister stated on the CNews TV channel.

Support for jihad and incitement to hate

Attorney Bolaky had then claimed that the authorities targeted “certain remarks made during sermons by one of the imams of the mosque — since suspended — who spoke on an unpaid basis.” The Hope and Brotherhood association has always advocated living together. “It is a respectable mosque,” he insisted.

The sermons of this imam, “described as an occasional speaker,” but, “in reality, a regular imam of the Great Mosque of Beauvais,” the decree reads, “promote jihad as a ‘duty’ and glorify the combatants, whom he describes as ‘heroes’, in the service of protecting the Muslim religion, which, according to this speaker, is threatened by Western societies.” Also according to the decree, his sermons “defend a rigorous and radical practice of Islam and the superiority of religious rules over those of French law, to which disobedience is legitimate.”

Continue reading

Quiz VI: Twenty Clues

Quiz VI: Twenty Clues

By Michael Copeland

incompatible with any free society
Viktor Orbán

[Its] world-view is very similar to ours.
— Heinrich Himmler

attracts violent people.
— Ali Sina, quoted by Geert Wilders, Berlin, Oct 2010,

attracts the scum of the Earth
Aussie Infidel, comment Dec 25, 2021 at 4:09 pm

light-years removed from the modern world.
Hamed Abdel-Samad, author

dragging everything it pollutes back into the stone age.
— Keith O, comment Dec 25, 2021 at 4:02 pm

an anti-modern, tribalist and sectarian mentality
Rogers Emerson

cannot peacefully coexist with the rest of humanity.
Peter Burrows

what a curse [it] is to all mankind
— Wellington, comment Nov 2, 2021 at 4:57 pm

It has nothing but misery and strife to bring…
— tim gallagher, comment Sep 2, 2021 at 5:21 pm

NO upside whatsoever
— Wellington, comment Dec 15, 2021 at 5:18 pm

a shackle on the stride of mankind
— Hellequin, Gentleman Bastard December 13, 2021 at 7:48 am

Continue reading

Allahu Akhbar! Vehicular Jihad in Marseille

It seems that driving a vehicle into pedestrians has become a new Christmas tradition in the last few years. The custom in Europe is to target shoppers in Christmas markets, while Christmas parades are the favored venue in the USA.

The incident in Marseille described below is unusual in two respects: the driver who was targeting pedestrians and other vehicles was a woman, and she embarked on her Christmas revel on the open road.

Oh, and she’s mentally ill. What a surprise!

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from Le Figaro:

Marseille: Woman tries to crash into several vehicles, then shouts “Allahu Akhbar” during her arrest

by Guillaume Poingt
December 24, 2021

The suspect, 34, was stopped by police with a copy of Koran in her hand. There were no injuries.

A 34-year-old woman, Asma B., was arrested Wednesday, 22 December around 14:30 after trying to deliberately collide with several vehicles on a pass in the Calanques massif, in the 9th district of Marseille, Le Figaro learned from a source close to the case.

Known to police (for destruction of private property) but unknown to national intelligence, the suspect — veiled — shouted, “Allahu Akhbar” several times during her arrest. Holding a Koran in her hand, she bragged of having “acted well” but also of being “in contact with terrorists”.

“If he approaches, you squash him!”

A few minutes before her arrest, several drivers called police to report the presence of this woman praying at the side of the road, close to a vehicle parked dangerously at the Gineste pass, a winding road connecting Marseille and Cassis.

Just after this prayer, the 30-something took the wheel of her vehicle then tried to deliberately crash into other drivers. Thinking that the woman driver wanted to kill herself, an individual got out of his car to try and establish a dialogue with her. But on approaching, he noticed that she was in a telephone conversation on speaker with a man who ordered her: “If he approaches, you squash him!”. The woman driver then attempted to crash into the pedestrian, missing him.

Taken into custody, Asma B. was brought to the emergency room after feeling ill. She was then hospitalized in the psychiatric ward. Formerly residing in Limoges, the subject had previously spent time in a psychiatric hospital in March 2019 due to a “delirious and paranoid” state. Investigations continue.

A “Radicalisation Expert” Reports to the Manchester Arena Inquiry

Salman Abedi, observant Muslim, Manchester Arena bomber

A “radicalisation expert” reports to the Manchester Arena Inquiry

By Michael Copeland

The Manchester Arena Inquiry is examining the circumstances of the bombing there by the Libyan Muslim jihadi Salman Abedi that killed and maimed multiple victims, many of them children. The Inquiry has received reports from Dr. Matthew Wilkinson, billed as a “radicalisation expert”. Their own report states that there is no suggestion that Dr. Wilkinson’s reports are written from other than an entirely objective viewpoint. Is that the case?


The UK Government’s definition of “radicalisation” is the “process by which a person comes to support terrorism and forms of extremism leading to terrorism”.

This term is used by politicians and media to create a category, the “radicalised” Muslim. This person, by inference, is thought of as different from an observant Muslim. He is assumed to have “misunderstood” his peaceful religion, and is therefore in need of being “de-radicalized” (whatever that may mean). This is not simply misleading: it is factually incorrect. The term is a trap. It sets up an artificial distinction which implicitly separates this category from mainstream Islam. It dangerously begets a subconscious assumption that ordinary Islam is calm and serene, when it is nothing of the sort.

A “radicalised” person, in the definition above, is one who espouses violence in his cause. Islam, it needs to be emphasised, mandates violence towards non-Muslims: “Kill them wherever you find them” (Koran 2:191, 9:5) is part of Islamic law. The distinction of “radicalised Muslim” from “Muslim” is bogus. Violence against kafirs is orthodox Islam, as taught in the mosques.

“Violence is the heart of Islam”
— Ayatollah Yazdi

“Islam was never for a day the religion of peace. Islam is the religion of war”
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Caliph of Islamic State, PhD in Islamic Studies

“Does Islam, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit? Yes!”
Osama bin Laden

Any observant Muslim knows that violence is commanded, and that he may be called upon to perform it. No Muslim may refute this. To do so entails denying a verse of the Koran, which immediately makes him a non-Muslim, subject to the penalty for leaving Islam — being killed vigilante-style by anyone. Such killing is free of punishment, “since it is killing someone who deserves to die” (Manual of Islamic Law, Reliance of the Traveller, o.8.4). So-called “radicalised” behaviour is, in fact, dutiful compliance with basic Islam.

“Radicalisation” is a fantasy fed to Western politicians and the Deep State. It is, however, a lucrative one, providing the subject matter for think tanks and taxpayer-funded programmes. For Muslims it usefully obscures and obfuscates what it is to be an observant member of Islam. In consequence it is difficult to dislodge.

Dr. Wilkinson has a distinction of his own. He is a convert to Islam. His reports are written from a Muslim viewpoint, which, it has to be said, is not “entirely objective”. In them he carefully steers the spotlight away from Islam. This is done by the artful use of doubt-casting, deflections, and selected vocabulary.

Continue reading

Let’s Go Easy on the Taliban

The German government has decided to soften its stance on the Taliban, for reasons of state.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the Epoch Times:

Federal government eases criminal prosecution of Taliban

The federal government has softened the prosecution against the Taliban and created political leeway. Since December 1, supporters of the terrorist organization can only be prosecuted in individual cases by authorization from the Ministry of Justice, reports Die Welt. As a spokeswoman for the newspaper announced, the “general authorization to prosecute past and future acts” was changed by the old government.

The new regulation that has now been adopted applies to all acts since the Taliban came to power in August. The criminal lawyer Mark A. Zöller from LMU [Ludwig Maximilian University] Munich said: “With the new version, the Federal Ministry of Justice is swiveling in the same direction as with the PKK [Kurdistan Workers Party]: membership of the Taliban would continue to be prosecuted according to Section 129b of the Criminal Code.”

But: In the case of mere support, the ministry will now decide on a case-by-case basis — possibly for political reasons. Experts see the danger that foreign policy interests such as the relationship with certain rulers might influence the judiciary.

According to the federal government, there is still no talk of normalization in dealing with the Taliban: The Taliban are still classified as a terrorist organization. This makes negotiations difficult and limits direct political support. The Foreign Office clearly states that “no financial aid is being paid to the Taliban.”

However, Germany provides humanitarian aid through international partner organizations. According to the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), state development cooperation with Afghanistan is currently on hold. “The de facto Taliban government is neither inclusive nor has respect for human rights guaranteed in the country.”

Andrea Lindholz (CSU), vice chairman of the parliamentary group of the Union, said: “I expect the new foreign minister to take a clear position on dealing with the Taliban and the situation in Afghanistan,” but at the same time provide help onsite and continue to support local staff.

A severe famine can only be prevented “by negotiating with the Taliban,” said Lindholz. Bijan Djir-Sarai, foreign policy spokesman for the FDP parliamentary group, said in general: “My basic stance on the Taliban is that they are not and cannot be serious partners.” However, there will have to be selective cooperation, especially in the context of humanitarian measures.

Afterword from the translator:

When I look at the draconian measures the German Government has been implementing against people who are suicide-hesitant and abstain from imbibing the Mengele-juice in copious amounts according to government “decree” — right now only coercion — it’s obvious where their priorities lie when it comes to governmental “humanitarianism”. As far as I know, the people who lost everything in the Aar Valley flood are still waiting for government help. It’s their taxes, after all, but seemingly not.


The latest essay by our Israeli correspondent MC discusses Nationalism and Socialism. Which one is good, and which one is bad? And which one is currently ascendant in this our twilight dystopia?


by MC

“Hear nothing that we do not wish you to hear. See nothing that we do not wish you to see. Believe nothing that we do not wish you to believe. Think nothing that we do not wish you to think.”

— Joseph Goebbels (Peikoff p.60)

The Bible tells us that Yah split the people into nations, and that behind the pre-Babel globalism was ‘Nimrod’ the mighty Hunter.

In the Hebrew, Esau was also a ‘mighty hunter’ — literally ‘a man of the field’; it is one of those phrases in ancient Hebrew that is not well understood. Just think how confusing the 1955 Doc Brown found Marty’s use of the word “heavy”…

The Trinity of Nimrod, Semirage and Tammuz was not at all healthy. The tower (of Babel) that they built was obviously designed to withstand a repeat flood, giving Yah the finger as such. The same kind of flood that Yah had used to wipe out a pre-flood mankind that was playing with genetic modification and creating chimera as described in the Book of Enoch., The flood wiped out the Nephilim (Giants), which Nimrod also wanted to reconstruct, post-flood.

Mankind could not be trusted with globalism even then, and this ‘new’ globalism is likely to be similar to what it was under Nimrod, with Satan rubbing his hands in glee.

There is nothing intrinsically wrong with Nationalism, but it does mean that we have to decide whether the problem with the Nazis, the National Socialist German Workers Party. was the Nationalism or the Socialism, or both.

Socialists claim it was the Nationalism that was at fault and have demonized ‘nationalism’, even whilst, in many ways, upholding it. After the war they took the moral high ground, claiming that all wars would be stopped if ‘nationalism’ was eradicated. This is one of the founding memes of the European Union and it is there in the preamble to the Treaty of Rome: the idea of “ever closer union”. Although the EU has a democratic façade, it is ruled by a committee, a “Council of Ministers” which ‘votes’ on items submitted to it by a ‘commission’ which comprises senior civil servants from the member nations under their respective ‘commissioners’ (a sinecure position given to retiring national politicians). There is, in the EU, a democratic deficit which is hidden behind the façade of a powerless European Parliament.

In many ways this European behemoth resembles the Nazi administration posited in its 1942 planning, and when compared with the way the United States tackled the same set of problems with disparate states in a federal (nationalist) setting, one can begin to see the contrasts. The USA, historically, had an amazing ability to recognize problems early and resolve them before they became fatal.

The Nazis sought a homogeneous German culture which excluded ‘non-Aryans’. The EU wants a unified ‘European’ man. The modern “Great Reset” wants to recreate a homogenized feudal culture where enslaved people across the whole world are allowed to exist solely to produce food and goods for the master race.

In the USA, each state has retained its unique character. Why? Because the idea was to keep Federal interference at a minimum, limited by a Constitution to defence and affairs of state via an elected executive. The EU, however, seeks to ‘harmonize’ the various member states via diktats from an unelected body. In the UK we always bought petrol (gas) by the imperial gallon, and butter by the half-pound. That all had to change once we joined the EU, and many small gas stations had to close down rather than buy new gas-pumping equipment calibrated in litres.

Another EU diktat also required that abattoirs have separate entry roads and exit roads. Again, many small local abattoirs had to close down.

Eventually the UK decided to leave the Union, and it seems many other groups across Europe are considering the same. Poland is having its issues, too, finding out that the EU is intolerant of Polish tradition and culture. There is a hidden cost to membership and access to funds: that of conformity and cultural suicide.

Over the top of all this are the ghoul billionaires, injecting cash into a globalist agenda. Soros and Gates were preceded by a hundred years by the multi-millionaire Cecil Rhodes who used his fortune to set up the original infrastructure (The Round Table) for world domination.

An interesting read on Rhodes and his influence is here. Although it contains the real history, it is a propaganda piece where the history is spun in such a way as to create a conspiracy theory.

Continue reading

Quiz IV: Eighteen Clues

Quiz IV: Eighteen Clues

Compiled by Michael Copeland

fundamentally committed to conquering the world
Anthony Flew, British philosopher
mortimer, comment

a political party and pursuit, and its followers are people of war.Ieronymos II, Archbishop of Athens and All Greece, Jan 17, 2021

a deeply racist and misogynistic culture that is anything but free… a self-pitying burden on humanity and a bloody nuisance to the civilised world.
Pat Condell

for war, hostage-taking, killing [non-members], fighting tyranny, taking war booty, taking women of the enemy as concubines.
27-year-old member

Anyone who is not a [member] is fair game for hostility and persecution.
Former member

it produces an endless stream of evil monsters
tim gallagher, comment Mar 4, 2021 at 3:16 pm

so unbelievably disgusting, the most poisonous ideology around
tim gallagher, comment

a criminal ideology hell-bent on world domination
Aussie Infidel, comment Mar 20, 2021 at 9:28 pm

a controlling totalitarian warrior culture that values men more than women, and death more than life.
Aussie Infidel comment Apr 7, 2021 at 5:13 pm

a danger to all religions in this world.
Yati Narsinghanand

a drag on mankind.
Wellington, comment May 16, 2021 at 4:41 pm

Continue reading