The Puir Wee Afghan Bairns Arrive in Leipzig

As I reported last month, the government of Pakistan decided to deport more than a million illegal Afghan immigrants, due to the increase in suicide bombings in the areas where the Afghans reside. Sympathetic migrant-welcoming Germans lobbied to get the puir wee Afghan bairns accepted in Germany, and now the first tranche of new Afghan “refugees” has begun to arrive.

The article below refers to the government’s “obligation to protect Afghans”. But what about its obligation to protect native Germans from Afghans?

Oh, right, I forgot: no such obligation exists. Only “refugees” have rights.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from Die Zeit:

Migration: 188 Afghans travel to Germany from Pakistan with promise of acceptance

The federal government wants to protect Afghans from mass deportations from Pakistan. 188 of them are now scheduled to arrive in Leipzig, and more could follow.

December 7, 2023

With a promise of acceptance in Germany, 188 Afghans from Pakistan have been flown to Leipzig. That was learned by the DPA News Agency from circles within the German embassy in the capital Islamabad. It is the first large charter flight from Pakistan with admitted Afghans in ten months. The majority of people are traveling under the federal admittance program, including former local employees.

The federal government has announced that it wants to protect Afghan refugees from mass deportations from Pakistan with a promise of admittance to Germany. In the beginning of October, the Pakistani government announced that refugees without residence permits would be deported. According to government figures, some 4.4 million Afghan refugees are in the country, 1.7 million of whom are without valid papers.

According to federal government figures, about 11,500 people from Afghanistan who have been promised acceptance are awaiting travel to Germany. Of those, some 3,000 are in Pakistan, 300 in Iran, and more than 8,000 in Afghanistan. Since the end of June, 573 have actually traveled to Germany. Relatives of Afghan journalists and activists have been criticizing the federal government for a long time for failing in its obligation to protect Afghans.

Among those eligible to enter the country, 572 also have a promise of acceptance under the federal admittance program. Through the federal admittance program, Afghans especially in danger due to their work for women’s and human rights or through their activity can come to Germany. The program would accommodate 1,000 Afghan women and men per month.

The AfD is Officially Deplorable in Saxony

As I mentioned in a French context on Thursday, European political elites label as “far right” anyone who wants to preserve native European culture and values. The German state of Saxony has now made that judgment formal: it has labeled the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany) as “right-wing extremist”, and therefore incompatible with the constitution. As far as I know, this is the first time official anathema has been pronounced against the AfD at the state level. (If any readers are aware of other such instances, please note them in the comments.)

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

“People’s understanding is incompatible with the Basic Law”

The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution classifies AfD Saxony as “certainly right-wing extremist”

Less than a year before the state elections in Saxony, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution came to the conclusion that the AfD there was “certainly right-wing extremist”. The main reason for this is the party’s concept of the German people, which is not compatible with the Basic Law [constitution].

Dresden

Saxony’s State Office for the Protection of the Constitution has classified the state’s AfD association as a “secure right-wing extremist effort.” “There are no longer any doubts about the right-wing extremist orientation of the AfD Saxony,” said the head of the state office, Dirk-Martin Christian, on Friday, commenting on his authority’s move.

When it comes to immigration , the state party pursues an ethno-pluralistic policy, which is a hallmark of right-wing political extremism. For many elected officials, the acquisition of German citizenship is linked exclusively to “ethnic-biological” or “cultural criteria”. “However, such a popular understanding is incompatible with the Basic Law,” the state office emphasized in a press release. It violates the guarantee of human dignity enshrined in the Basic Law. [What about the human dignity of the German women and children who are culturally enriched? I guess, since they are natives, their claim on humanity is tenuous at best, and non-existent in this politically correct reality.]

Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution: AfD-Saxony is agitating in the midst of society

This understanding may be traced back primarily to the “solidarity-patriotic camp, whose spiritual father and leader is the right-wing extremist Björn Höcke.” Under his influence, AfD-Saxony has now become a “monolithic bloc”. Keywords such as “party cartel” and “unjust regime” showed that the regional association was not looking for an objective discussion of the political situation, but rather wanted to achieve the “debasement” of democracy. [Well, it takes one to know what that type of debasement is, now, doesn’t it?]

“Overall, AfD Saxony’s aim is, among other things, to use this vocabulary to fundamentally shake the population’s trust in the constitutional order and functionality of our democracy and to force protests and resistance from the midst of society,” concluded the Saxon Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution’s assessment. The new state parliament will be elected in Saxony in September of next year. According to surveys, the AfD is currently the strongest political force. [They are mortally afraid that when they are eventually ousted — at least I hope so — all of the decomposing bodies and smelly skeletons of all those they took “care of” on behalf of their puppet-masters will be found in their desk drawers and broom closets. It’s about time for them to dance to the Devil’s fiddle.]

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

The Muezzin Yodels at the Christmas Market

It looks like the only way to avoid an Islamic terror attack at a Christmas market in Germany is to have a muezzin ululate the Islamic call to prayer over the opening of the market.

Yep, that should take care of the problem.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the online news portal Nius:

Karlstadt in Franconia: Christmas market opens with muezzin call

In Karlstadt, a tranquil town in Franconia, the Andreas market took place on November 26th, which was intended to introduce visitors to Islam this year.

Under the motto “Orient meets Occident,” the local mosque associations, including the Ditib* Mosque, which is under Turkish control, took over the reins. A muezzin opened the market with loud Islamic prayer chanting over loudspeakers.

After the opening, things continued in the spirit of oriental Islamic customs: relevant Muslim prayer practices were presented on stage, for example in which postures symbolic submission should take place.

Christian Christmas songs were completely omitted at the announced “pre-Christmas flea market”; a children’s choir performed Muslim songs instead. The culinary offering was also adapted to the oriental concept: instead of mulled wine and fried almonds, this time there was fried Turkish garlic sausage and tantuni, reports the Main Post.

Who is behind the event managers?

Ditib, the Turkish-Islamic Union of the Institution for Religion, is one of the largest Islamic organizations in Germany. It includes over 900 member associations, primarily mosque communities. As an association, Ditib reports directly to Diyanet, the Turkish state religious authority.

Ditib and the Turkish umbrella organization Diyanet have been criticized for years for being the mouthpiece of the Turkish AKP government, holding anti-Semitic sermons in the Ditib mosques or publicly praying for the Turkish invasion of the Kurdish areas. “O Allah, lead our glorious army to victory,” the prayer text says.

The local newspaper Main Post reported uncritically on the event and noted that the participation of the population was low. The lack of interest in the Islam market was attributed to the bad weather.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

Africa is Coming Home to Europe

Robert Frost famously wrote, “Home is the place where, when you have to go there,/They have to take you in.” (in “The Death of the Hired Man”).

That’s how you can tell Europe is the home of Africans: if they manage to get there, Europe has to take them in.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Apollo News. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

“Now the horror scenario is occurring for Europe” — Niger is reopening migration routes

Since 2015, the African country of Niger has helped Europe massively to limit the flow of migrants through the Sahara and across the Mediterranean. The junta in Niger is now repealing the relevant law and clearing the way for more African mass migration.

The smuggling of migrants in Niger, West Africa, is going to be unpunished in the future. The country’s military junta repealed a corresponding law at the end of last week. This is what was announced on Nigerian state television. The 2015 law banned the transport of migrants through Niger. The law came about at the request of the EU: in return, Brussels provided around €75 million for projects to curb migration. During the migration crisis of 2015/2016, the EU removed a lot of migration pressure from its borders. [What do they mean by “a lot”? Europe was overrun by millions of hostiles and it has been going on ever since. Stop paying these people benefits and they will not bother. But no, they pay instead “Danegeld” to corrupt governments instead. As if that had ever worked in the past.]

In Niger, a military coup deposed the EU-friendly government in July. After previous Western allies condemned the coup, the junta is seeking domestic support. These include the desert communities in the north that benefited most from migration. Among other things, they sold fuel to smugglers. Migration is also a business in the country’s large cities, such as Agadez: the care and accommodation of migrants is a real industry in the country. One that should now bloom again. “This law has been repealed! The EU can keep gesticulating!” triumphed the spokesman for the coup government.

With the end of the restrictive anti-migration policy in Niger, the number of migrants traveling to Europe is likely to increase again. “The horror scenario is now occurring for Europe,” says Ulf Laessing, who works for the CDU-affiliated Konrad Adenauer Foundation in the Sahel zone. “Migration through Niger to Libya will now increase sharply again.” Migration is also being used as a weapon against Europe, he says. [That insight comes DECADES too late, mate. And now the taxpayers of Europe “reap” what you guys so happily have sown for your own ego. And it’s mass rape, murder and mayhem you’ve sown.]

“Russia — similar to Mali and Burkina Faso — is actively seeking the favour of the new rulers and is taking advantage of Europe’s hesitation. “Moscow is likely to encourage the junta to allow more migration through Niger towards the Mediterranean coast in order to destabilize Europe,” Laessing continued. Before the migration pact between the EU and Niger, around 300,000 migrants traveled through the country on their way to Europe.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

The Greens Want It All

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Party conference in Karlsruhe

The Green Party base wants to stop deportations and abolish “prosperity”

The federal government is moving too far to the right for the Green base. They want to go back to “no person is illegal” and open borders. She wants to take completely new paths in economic policy.

The social debate has changed. The Greens, with their fantasies of open borders, are no longer setting the tone. The Chancellor, a Social Democrat, recently announced deportations “on a large scale”. The Green base is angry. [A large scale? That’s a sick joke, since it will only be 600 additional deportations per year, with a daily influx of over 1,500. Do the math; it’s all hogwash.]

The 49th Green Party Congress begins in Karlsruhe on Thursday evening and could get heated. The party leadership is re-elected, the candidates for the European elections are determined and an associated election program is agreed upon. There are already more than 1,600 amendment requests for this.

The party leadership wrote in the main motion: “We want returns to be carried out in accordance with the rule of law. Not everyone who comes to Germany can stay.” A no-go for the base. [“Base” is the right word for these leeches.] “There are no humane deportations!” says one application. They are always violent and should therefore be rejected. [Don’t let them in in the first place and there will be no violence from their side. Quite simple, Dumbo.]

“No person is illegal” instead of “repatriations”

Even the creation of the word “repatriation” instead of “deportation” would not change this. Rather, one must oppose the “progressive shift to the right”. The human right to asylum and the human right to freedom of movement — probably intended as a synonym for open borders — should not be restricted. “What we should fight for is a change in how we deal with migrants and refugees — towards fighting for every single person to be able to lead a new life here.” [Allahu Akhbar!]

Another amendment is directed against the phrase “humanity and order”. Instead it should say “No person is illegal”. Because people are not illegal, only their behavior can be illegal. For the Green base, unauthorized entry into Germany does not seem to be illegal.

Greens want to abolish “prosperity” [But only for those who aren’t in the higher echelons of the Politburo, and an abysmal “quality of life” will be for the rest.]

The Green base wants to say goodbye to the word “prosperity”. The party leadership named an entire chapter after it: “What Protects Prosperity”. The applicants argue that the term is outdated. As a synonym for material standards and goals, it is incompatible with the election program. Rather, the term “quality of life” should be introduced. Because the new wording contains much more than just material standards. “Healthy nature and food, external, internal and social security” is what the Greens stand for and also the new term quality of life. “It’s also a sign that the goals have to change.”

Continue reading

Brown Border

After a long hiatus, Max Denken returns with a film review that is much more than a review: he has a family connection with the area of Poland that abuts the border with Belarus and is featured in the movie.

Brown Border

by Max Denken

The movie

Tired and jet-lagged upon arrival in Warsaw, I bide the daytime hours. A walking distance from my hotel, a movie theater is playing Green Border, the new film by Polish émigré film director Agnieszka Holland.

America’s most prominent film school and a stab at a Hollywood career are as long behind me as are Holland’s days at the FAMU film school in Prague. I once introduced to a Los Angeles audience Krzysztof Zanussi, the Polish film director with whom, as his assistant director, Holland began her career, but my paths never crossed hers nor did my interests in film or life run parallel. Still, I loved her children’s film The Secret Garden (1993) and, as an animal lover, could identify with her revulsion at a driven hunt’s wholesale slaughter of wildlife in Spoor (2017). I drag myself out of the hotel and go to see Green Border, Holland’s film that had just had its premiere screening at the 80th Venice Film Festival in September, 2023.

What I proceed to endure for two and a half interminable hours is an agitprop salad similar in intent but far below the artistic level of such famous purveyors of film propaganda as Sergei Eisenstein for the Bolsheviks and Leni Riefenstahl for Hitler. There is no story with real human characters in the traditional narrative sense but a weepy outburst about numinous Syrian, Afghan, and African refugees trying to invade Poland’s via its border from Belarus and being brutally repulsed.

The New York Film Festival synopsized the film as, “A Syrian family leaves the violence of their country behind, hoping to cross from Belarus into Poland and then onto the safe haven of Sweden. But, like so many lost souls, they end up caught in a political maelstrom, demonized by the Polish government and press and used as pawns in an inhumane, deadly border game.”

The reality background to Holland’s invention is that in July, 2021, Alexandr Lukashenko, the dictator leader of Belarus, threatened to “flood” the European Union with drugs and migrants and proceeded with this scheme of hybrid warfare. Belarussian agencies in tandem with some Middle Eastern airlines fraudulently promoted easy entry into the EU’s territory and arranged for the delivery of migrants to the Polish-Belarus border. It was an inhumane, cynical ploy probably ordered by Lukashenko’s ally in the Kremlin to either force a stream of undesirables onto Russia’s foe, Poland, or to make Poland look bad if it refused to grant them passage.

A flood of Iraqis, Syrians, Afghans, Congolese, Cameroonians, and Sudanese followed to the forested border. By November 2021, Poland’s border guard had intercepted over 32,000 migrants’ attempts to invade Poland. Having defied the EU’s order to take in a share of Angela Merkel’s invitees since 2015, Poland’s PiS government, to its credit, was not going to yield to this Putin/Lukashenko ploy, either.

And that evidently unleashed in Ms. Holland — daughter of a Polish-Jewish high communist official and notorious European “progressive” — her own flood: that of the maternal bonding female hormone oxytocin. The same one that a group of German — what else — scientists stated in their 2017 paper “Oxytocin-enforced norm compliance reduces xenophobic outgroup rejection “ would reduce “xenophobic outgroup rejection” if administered to all those racist white people who don’t want half a billion African and Middle Eastern Muslim refugees in Europe and North America.

Holland’s migrants are “refugees” and “people like us” — middle class in their countries, handy with English and cellphones, and with means sufficient to have paid the stiff costs of this passage. In reality, they are not like us.

Holland’s Syrian “refugees” are not the stabbers of children in a playground in Annecy or hateful attackers of Jews in Vienna. They are not the Syrian refugees who just in 12 months of 2016/2017, set a homeless man on fire on Christmas in Berlin or, screaming “Allahu Akbar,” attacked and injured four people at a bus station in Lünen. They are not the Syrian refugee who murdered a pregnant woman with a machete and wounded two others at a bus station in Reutlingen.

They are not the Syrian “asylum seeker” who raped a 44-year-old mentally disabled woman in Soest. They are not the 27-year-old Syrian who stabbed and killed a Red Cross mental health counselor in Saarbrücken, or the one who tried to behead 64-year-old Ilona Fugmann who had offered him a job at her beauty salon in Herzberg.

They are not the Syrian “asylum seekers” who were filming and molesting underage girls at a swimming pool in Löbau or the ones who did so in Mariendorf, or the one who sexually assaulted a ten-year-old girl in Tübingen.

Holland’s Syrians are not the “migrant” who went on a “stabbing-spree” on board a train in Bavaria, or the one who attacked passengers on a bus from Berlin to Milan. They are not the “asylum seeker” who blew himself up next to a wine bar in Ansbach and wounded 15 people, or the one in Pittsburgh, who sought to blow up a church for Isis. Nor are they like Abdalfatah who sought refuge in Germany after murdering 36 people in Syria for the Jabhat al-Nusra jihadist group.

No, they are just a cute family with a genial grandpa, a well-married couple, and their nice boy, little girl, and a baby. Not even a Syrian “refugee” family where the father murders his wife because she irritated him, or murders his wife and two daughters and leaves them dead in a freezer.

Holland’s Afghan refugees in the film consist of one English-speaking, kind woman who “helped the Americans” during the Afghanistan war. In reality, Afghan rapefugees sow terror in the heart of Europe’s women. They rape and murder. Again and again, everywhere in Europe, solo and in groups, boasting of it on Facebook, the victim alternately an adult, girl, or boy.

Holland’s sole Afghan is not the 19-year-old Afghan “asylum seeker” who stabbed three people in Ravensburg, or the 41-year-old who murdered a five-year-old Russian boy and severely wounded his mother in Arnschwang, or the one whose sexual intercourse with a woman in Limerick included stabbing her to death in a “frenzied attack “. Nor is she portraying the Afghan migrant who murdered two people in Serbia and then one in Britain, or the one who stabbed seven people in Sweden. Just a kind, educated, Afghan woman mistreated by Polish goons-in-uniform.

Holland’s Africans are not the testosterone-filled, young primitives landing on Europe’s shores by the hundreds of thousands and terrorizing the local population, roasting cats, brandishing their penises or defecating in public, brawling and destroying property incessantly and everywhere. One ought to check out the @RadioGenoa account on X to see much evidence of what they are about. But for Holland they are just a couple of nice, well-behaved teens.

The border has a barbed wire fence. Those nice Syrians, Africans, and one nice lady from Afghanistan are trying repeatedly to breach that fence and each time are repulsed by pitiless, all-black (in character) goons serving as Poland’s Border Patrol. When on the staging side of the barbed wire fence, they are exploited and humiliated by even worse Belarussian goons-in-uniform, and then pushed through that fence into a country whose Border Patrol pushes them back.

They are hungry, thirsty, cold. Some are sick. But then, before Western progressives decided that reality is optional, the law of the Universe has always been that one suffers the consequences of one’s mistakes. Few mistakes can be as bad as to have traveled from faraway Asia and Africa to the Polish border in the belief that it will give way.

Eventually, some manage to get through the fence and, after more harrowing adventures like drowning in a swamp, are aided by a group of young Polish radicals, given food, medical treatment, and shelter and transportation deeper into Poland in the approving glow of the demiurge of this moral fantasy: Agnieszka Holland.

Holland portrays the enforcers of Poland’s territorial sovereignty as primitive cartoon villains, pitiless at the bottom, and fascist at the top. The bottom is the Polish Border Patrol that has no pity even for pregnant women. They toss one over the fence back onto Belarus soil and manhandle many others. Their officer shouts that the pitiful group of migrants mired between the barbed wire and the swamp are “not people” but bullets fired into the heart of Poland.

The only border guard portrayed with sympathetic shading is Jan, whose wife is pregnant and disapproving of his “brutal” occupation. Jan initially participates in the pushback actions but is gradually sickened by the required violence and softens to the point of pretending not to see “migrants” transported into Poland’s interior by another kind Pole.

At the top are the “fascists” — Poland’s slightly right-of-center PiS ruling party that has given the finger to the European Union’s demands for absorbing a “fair share” of the kind of “refugees” that Angela Merkel and the EU were importing by the millions before Lukashenko decided to give them more of their medicine.

Holland, along with most of Poland’s cultural elite, is an outspoken, leftist enemy of PiS — the party that has said No to invaders from alien cultures. She has gone so far into the swamp of “progressive” hysteria that one of her two more developed “good-guy” characters, Bogdan, tells his therapist that he cannot stand the “Nazis” marching in Warsaw under the protection of the “fascist” government — a lie so grotesque as to indicate the warped furniture in Ms. Holland’s brain. Bogdan confesses as well that because of those Polish “Nazis” and fascists he is impotent, cannot sleep, eat, or think.

Vitality returns to Bogdan’s so-dreary life with a loving family in a luxurious villa near Warsaw when he too engages in the “activist” effort. He and his wife and children host three young North-African migrants just smuggled in from the border, invite them to their dinner table, and so on. In a scene characteristic of the twisted minds of Holland and white progressives everywhere, Bogdan’s sons bond with the Africans by joining them in a French rap.

For the white rich kids, knowing French is normal. But what’s more telling is that they, Poles far removed from Africa, have adopted the black culture and they rap in French as expertly as their African guests do. In Poland.

It would never have occurred to Holland to write the scene in the opposite way, with the African guests making an effort to adapt to the culture of their hosts and singing with them a Polish song with the harmonies that are Europe’s culture heritage.

Julia is the other more developed “good guy” character. She is Bogdan’s psychologist and Zoom interlocutor. Moved by the plight of the migrants in the forest near her home, Julia turns from a bystander to a committed rescuer working with the younger activists to smuggle as many migrants into Poland as possible. Maja Ostaszewska, who plays Julia, is a well-known “progressive” and major pro-migrants activist in Poland.

The rest of the positive characters are the bleeding-heart Polish volunteers who help the migrant invaders and made it past the border fence. They are all unalloyed cartoon goodness just as the border guards and policemen who are the barrier against the invaders are the unalloyed evil.

I have written a book and several articles about the horrors that refugees, “refugees,” and migrants from Asian Muslim countries and Africa inflict on Europe. I saw this film while a true African invasion was landing on the beaches of Lampedusa. I am writing this in November, when that invasion is continuing while huge crowds of Muslim imports are marching and rioting all over Europe and the entire Anglosphere, waving black jihad flags, shouting “Death to the Jews,” and generally behaving in ways not seen since the Kristallnacht. I am appalled at Holland’s specious propaganda masquerading as a film drama, her smearing of the one, rare state sane enough to have resisted to rush to self-obliteration, her libelous depiction of the Polish Border Patrol.

I am therefore renaming Green Border as Brown Border. The brown adjective comes from my long-ago Hollywood mentor, an Irish curmudgeon who had elbowed his way to a position of influence in that Jewish-founded-and-dominated industry. Art had long-ago mastered Yiddish, so he taught me some. When it came to a lousy film, hackneyed book, or a revolting painting, he invariably called it dreck. When it came to a lousy human being, he reverted to his native Irish brogue: shite.

Whether dreck or shite, it’s the same color. Green Border is not a work of art but a lying, hysterical outpouring of agitprop by a female raised in a privileged communist home, favoring her ideology over reality, and attacking a polity that, since 1989, no longer adheres to diktats of the Comintern. It’s par for the course that the World Socialist Website attacked Holland’s detractors in a headline reading “The Polish far-right’s vicious campaign against Agnieszka Holland’s film ‘The Green Border’ replete with ‘ antisemitic and fascistic undertones against the film’.”

The reality

Something needs to be said about those “bullets into the heart of Poland” — words that Holland put in the mouth of the Border Guard’s commander, no doubt to imply that he is the epitome of evil. In reality, those words are appropriate and would have been even if the border-busting migrants consisted mostly of women, children and kind men — which they didn’t.


A still frame from Zielona Granica (Green Border) shown on the web page of the 2023 Venezia Biennale film festival.


The Poland-Belarus border, with the actual menacing migrants trying to force it.

One now has ample opportunities to see what happens to countries that had a more tenderhearted approach to Muslim refugees and “refugees.” Here is Berlin and here is London. Or New York, or Dearborn, or a hundred other cities in the pathologically altruist West. A European or Europeans-founded country signs its death warrant even if taking in African and Asian Muslim women and children, let along young, military-age men who are the great majority of the invaders.

Continue reading

Rolling Out the Red Carpet for the Culture-Enrichers

It seems that the current policy of Berlin’s municipal government is to spare no expense when it comes to accommodating, feeding, and entertaining the thousands of “refugees” who have poured into the city since the floodgates were opened in 2015.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Apollo News:

Over €9000 Per Day

Berlin Senate rents luxury hotel on Ku’damm for asylum seekers

The Berlin government has rented a luxury hotel in a prime location in Berlin-Charlottenburg to accommodate refugees. Accommodation in the residence with sauna, luxury suites and elegant winter garden lounge costs €9,462 per day — without meals.

Five minutes walk to the Hilton Hotel, ten minutes to KaDeWe — the DORMERO Hotel Berlin Ku’damm is in a prime location in the posh Charlottenburg district. There is a lot on offer for guests: a reception with a red carpet awaits you at the entrance, followed by a winter garden lounge with piano music — of course only from a Steinway & Sons grand piano. If you want, you can enjoy yourself at the chic hotel bar with a red light design or the in-house spa area with sauna — or retreat to your suite with an extra dressing room, make-up room and bathtub. Anyone who wants to hold a meeting or get married on site won’t be left out either: the hotel offers stylish event rooms with velvet armchairs and fine wallpaper for rent.

In recent times, this luxury no longer benefits the well-heeled clientele of the Charlottenburg chic, but rather around 166 asylum seekers. As the State Office for Refugees (LAF) told Bild when asked, the hotel was rented by the Berlin Senate to accommodate refugees. Accordingly, the LAF pays the hotel around €57 per person per day. For the 166 asylum seekers who are supposed to move into the hotel, this amounts to €9,462 per day and €283,860 per month. Meals are not included in the price. The hotel has 72 rooms and six suites. On average, the rooms are apparently allocated with double occupancy.

Berlin Senate wants to accommodate more asylum seekers in hotels

The LAF was ordered by the Berlin Senate to rent more and more hotels to accommodate asylum seekers. According to Bild, 960 asylum seekers have already been accommodated in hotels, and a further 540 places are still being sought.

The DORMERO Hotel Berlin is not the first luxury hotel to be rented in Germany to accommodate refugees. Only a month ago it was announced that the more than 300-year-old Atlas Posthotel in Garmisch-Partenkirchen would be rented for refugees by the responsible state parliament office. According to media reports, 620 refugees will also be accommodated in the four-star Hotel Van der Valk in Gladbeck near Münster.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

German Tax Dollars to Pay For Mosques?

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Boris Reitschuster’s website. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Real satire? Spahn wants to finance mosques with tax money

“I don’t want to know what this country will look like in ten or twenty years”

Even as health minister, today’s deputy leader of the Union parliamentary group Jens Spahn was always good for surprises and absurdities. No measure or harassment of citizens seemed too absurd to him when it came to paying homage to the Corona cult and appeasing Karl Lauterbach.

Now Spahn is continuing his course when it comes to Islam. He is outraged that the largest proportion of mosques in Germany is financed from abroad and that imams are Turkish state employees. “This has to stop,” said Spahn.

And quite rightly so. In fact, on the one hand, foreign influence all too often causes radicalization, and on the other hand, the members of the relevant Muslim communities are regularly sworn to loyalty to a foreign state — in the middle of Germany.

“We need German mosque communities, not Turkish ones,” Spahn continued in an interview with the newspapers of the Funke media group.

So one could only agree with Spahn if it weren’t for another suggestion from him: He wants the financing to change. “It would be even better to step in with German tax money, even if this may require a constitutional change,” said the CDU politician.

I’m sorry, WHAT? Has Spahn taken leave of his senses?

He is probably simply a victim of the escapism evident in large circles of our politics. [After all, it’s so in vogue.]

Because the reality is as follows: Even where the state pays, for example with Islam lessons in schools, radical ideas are all too often taught, as the journalist Constantin Schreiber vividly shows in his book Kinder des Koran [“Children of the Koran”].

If the German state were in a position to have a moderating effect on the communities in return for financing the mosques, there might still be a few arguments for biting the bullet. [Those morons. Are they really that stupid? They’d have to rewrite the entire Quran in Arabic and replace it WORLDWIDE without any Muslim scholar noticing it.]

But our state has demonstratively proven that it is unable to do this. I recently reported here on the way a project with radical imams continues to be financed with tax money. [What a surprise, NOT. After all, even the Taliban isn’t outlawed in Germany and can operate unhindered.]

In the final analysis, Spahn’s proposal would therefore very likely lead to the same radical ideas being preached at relevant mosques as before — only no longer financed by foreign states, but by the German taxpayer. Erdogan &. Co. could be happy.

Spahn’s request to Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser (SPD) to no longer issue visas to foreign imams could make more sense.

But is “counter-right” [Interior Minister Nancy] Faeser really ready for this?

Unlikely.

Continue reading

Bring in All the Cousins!

And second, third, and fourth wives, too. And all those puir wee culture-enriching bairns.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the online news portal Nius. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Halt of family reunification overturned overnight: This decision means that second wives can continue to come to Germany

Hundreds of thousands of migrants come to Germany via family reunification. The decision of the States Prime Ministers’ Conference now makes it clear: everything shall continue as before. There is no end in sight to family reunification.

Hundreds of thousands of migrants have come to Germany in recent years thanks to the opportunity to bring family members with them. The Foreign Office distributed 117,000 visas for family members last year alone. From January to June 2023 there were an additional 77,000 visas, which is why a new record number is expected this year.

Due to the high numbers, the AfD and the Union have been calling for family reunification to be stopped or at least limited for some time. The draft for the Prime Minister’s Conference on Monday, which was co-developed by the CDU, originally envisaged at least a stop to family reunification for those entitled to subsidiary protection: “As an immediate measure, family reunification with those entitled to subsidiary protection will be temporarily limited except for cases of particular hardship.”

Thwarted by the Chancellor and the Greens

However, this is no longer mentioned in the final version. Instead, the final decision states: “Family reunification with those entitled to subsidiary protection will not be expanded.” Not expanded, which means: everything continues as before when it comes to family reunification. “Union States wanted significantly more, but were thwarted by the Chancellor and the Greens,” commented the CDU politician Jens Spahn on the results, referring to the “necessary restriction on family reunification” that did not take place. [What a hypocrite — he was one of those who helped Merkel open the floodgates, and then they destroyed the mechanisms to close them. It’s just another load of hogwash from the CDU to keep their stupid voters in Elysium.]

The federal government is promoting plural marriage in Germany by distributing visas

Two cases recently became known in which the federal government brought second wives and their children from Afghan migrants into the country. The first case involved an Afghan man with two wives who had previously lived in Germany with his first wife and three children. The second wife now lives in a separate apartment with another seven children. The second case also involved an Afghan who now lives with two wives and nine children.

Bigamy is actually forbidden in Germany. The authorities cannot say how many such polygamous marriages there are now in Germany. The immigration of second wives is actually not allowed either, but is possible through other means: Due to the residence law, it may be possible for second wives, as a parent, to move to their children, explained the Parliamentary State Secretary of the Ministry of the Interior, Mahmut Özdemir (SPD), in September in response to a written request. [I wonder how many wives he has? With their lavish salary that these political parasites squeeze out of the German taxpayer, I’d say 7.]

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

The Muslim Underground Surfaces, Part II

As promised, here is the second part of Seneca III’s two-part essay on the Islamization of Britain.

The Muslim Underground Surfaces

Part II: Mosques, the Prepared and the Unprepared

by Seneca III

Prologue: The neologism “dimorphicloyalty” doesn’t exist in any dictionary, but it adequately describes the substance of the unctuous pro-Islam edicts emanating from that privileged rabble pontificating in the Palace of Westminster. Laws, rules and regulations, although occasionally written with the best intentions, often suffer a slip twixt cup and lip and our Courts exist to act as the ultimate arbiters when adjudicating between the intended spirit of such edicts, as opposed to the inventive interpretations and replacements superimposed by the new colonisers and their indigenous supporters. The reality is that Parliament, the courts and the legal profession as a whole have been infiltrated by the enemy within, so there is no hope that any help will be forthcoming from them, because the exact opposite is happening.

The false, constructed crime of ‘Islamophobia’ is getting increasing traction and airing in the media. It would appear that the people promoting this oxymoron are either unaware of the meaning, plain stupid or simply malicious turncoats. For their information, I point out that a phobia is defined in the OED as an irrational fear. Yet, in view of recent events on our streets, I see nothing irrational or fearful about it. It is definitely not a phobia but a natural survival reaction to an obvious threat, a threat that even our pathetic political classes now have to accept as they sit huddled in the Cobra Room in Downing Street deciding whether or not to raise the domestic terror threat from Substantial to Severe.

Mosques: As iterated in Part I, the number of mosques in the UK varies depending on the source and the definition of a mosque. However, a reasonable estimate is that there are around 1,800 to 2,000 mosques. These mosques serve about three and a half million Muslims, who make up about 5% of the UK population. The most common size for a mosque in the UK is between 101 and 200 people.

In the main, mosques are constructed by Muslim contractors and, where Muslim contractors are lacking the major project skills and the necessary licenses as are required by law, it is non-Muslim civil engineers who are contracted to build and certify the main structure, its foundations, its drainage and the overall safety thereof according to the approved plan.

The intricate maze of none-structural-weight-bearing accommodations, store rooms, offices, lavatories, kitchens and powerful sound systems to blast out sermons of hate and calls to Jihad are then carried out by Muslims away from unclean (and observant) infidel eyes. An additional factor is that most of these mosques have been built in areas controlled by Muslim majority Labour councils who appoint Muslim building inspectors to sign off on them, including the maze of internal sub-structures.

This is disturbing, because to my knowledge no mosque in the UK , other than Finsbury Park mosque which was raided by the Security Service in 2003, has ever been searched for any reason whatsoever, never mind for arms, explosives and other forms of contraband using sniffer dogs and cavity detectors. If this thought bothers you, then may I suggest that you carefully read the section on Luton airport and see if you can see any possible connections between it, British mosques and Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s statement that “The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets.”

So now to the infamous Finsbury Park Mosque, also known as the North London Central Mosque. It is a five-storey abomination located next to Finsbury Park station close to Arsenal Football Club’s Emirates Stadium in the London Borough of Islington. It is registered as a charity in England, serving the local community in Islington and the surrounding boroughs of North London.

The mosque hit the headlines after Abu Hamza al-Masri, a radical preacher, became its Imam in 1997. In 2003, the mosque was closed by its trustees following the anti-terrorist police raid, and re-opened in 2005 under new leadership. New leadership? Well, Hooky Hamza is certainly no longer there, as he is otherwise occupied enjoying life in an American high security hospitality centre, but the Jihadi Doctor Abdul Wahid, a.k.a. the GP Dr Wahid Asif Shaida, holds a high position on its executive council.

As head of Hizb ut-Tahrir in the UK, Abdul Wahid celebrated the barbaric Hamas terror attacks that slaughtered 1,400 Jewish men, women and children earlier this month as a ‘very welcome punch on the nose’ to Israel, but he has also spent more than twenty years practising as a family doctor under his real name, Dr Wahid Asif Shaida.

Wahid told the baying crowd: “Victory is coming and everyone has to choose a side. Whose side are you going to be on?” but some patients told the MoS his leadership of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Britain called into question whether he was capable of fairly treating Jewish, female or gay patients. Wahid is also said to have a close association with the infamous Finsbury Park Mosque. (More on that hotbed of Jihad later.)

[Hizb ut-Tahrir is an international Islamist movement seeking to unite Muslims under one Islamic caliphate. Hizb ut-Tahrir members have been linked to violent acts in multiple countries. The group itself has been banned in at least 13 countries, including many Muslim-majority countries, but not by the vote-whoring dhimmis of Westminster.]

A security source also questioned whether Wahid would follow his legal duty as a GP to report patients with signs of extremism to the Prevent anti-terror scheme, saying: “What guarantee is there he will refer extremists when he himself is one?” Professor Anthony Glees, a terrorism expert, added “A GP who glorifies Islamic extremism like this not only puts his patients at risk, but is a risk to national security.”

Labour MP Khalid Mahmood added that…

Continue reading

Death to the Hell People!

Many thanks to Nash Montana for translating this article from the Austrian portal Heimatkurier:

Insane: Turkish man murdered out of hate for Germans and had a kill-list that he titled “Hell people”

A Turkish man murdered a 58-year old German in Bremen — out of “pure hatred of German nationals”. Allegedly, he also stored a kill-list on his smartphone that he titled “Hell people”. This bizarre case reveals one thing: The hatred against German people is a bitter reality. While the state pumps millions in tax money into migrant and leftist pet projects, they actually promote precisely this kind of hate.

The Turkish national Abdulsamet Y. is facing court in Bochum. He allegedly shot a German Telekon employee with a semiautomatic pistol. The 26-year-old Turk dressed in a work uniform and ambushed 58-year-old Alfred N. in an underground garage. He shot Alfred N. in the back five times. He then stole the victim’s car and drove off. The initial manhunt for the suspect was unsuccessful, and only the stolen car could be located.

Kill-list with “Hell People”

The result of the investigation yielded: The Turk carried a list with more potential victims. It was stored on his smartphone under the title “Hell people”. More than a dozen names and cell phone numbers were saved on the crazy Turk’s list. Among them those of a married couple from Hamm. Apparently the oriental man was embroiled in a fight with the couple due to his erratic driving, during which he also called them “AfD voters”. Furthermore, he listed a German contractor from Dortmund. Abdulsamet Y. had a run-in with this man and threatened him with a semi-automatic weapon. On the list as well: Code enforcement employees, police, and ultimately the name, address and personal date of the 58-year-old victim Alfred N.

Murder out of pure hatred of Germans

More details about the investigation have not been published as of yet. But the state prosecutor has named a probably motive for the crime: Abdulsamet Y. hates Germans. After he realized he was coming out on the losing end of a traffic argument with Alfred N., he decided to kill the 58-year-old man — based on his hatred of “German nationals”. The motive doesn’t seem to be an isolated incident, either. The African Illerkirchberg murderer (“Germans are filthy and pigs”) stabbed a 14-year-old German girl to death in December of 2022. The 27-year-old Eritrean national described Germans as “filthy”, “dirty”, and he compared them to pigs. In October of 2022, a 26-year old Somali national butchered two German handymen on their way to work. His motive: “anger directed at German men”.

Continue reading

The New Lebanon

Filip Dewinter of Vlaams Belang recently tweeted the following video with this introduction (translated from the Dutch):

A prophetic Jean-Marie Le Pen @lepenjm 35 years ago: ‘The foreigners who come here bring their way of life, their customs, traditions and religion and will sooner or later impose them on us like in #Lebanon.’

Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Make Room! Make Room!

A landlord in the German city of Dresden has evicted native German tenants, ostensibly because the building was to be demolished, but in reality because their quarters were needed for migrants.

Many thanks to Nash Montana for translating this article from the Austrian news portal Der Status:

Phony demolition: German tenants forced to make room for asylum seekers

“We have room”: With such empty catchphrases, the self proclaimed ‘better humans’ advertised for the ongoing mass-scale influx of asylum seekers. The distribution battle continues to become more intense by the minute in Germany’s housing crisis. And it looks as if landlords in Dresden have now gone the extra mile: Dresden tenants were lured to leave their four walls behind under the scam that their houses were marked for demolition. And then a few months later, during which the houses remained empty and untouched, asylum seekers are preparing to move in.

Demolition scam: Germans out, asylum seekers in

In the truest sense of the concept, the Kleinschachwitz district in the city of Dresden is now practicing actual population exchange. At the rental property on the Johannes-Brahms-Strasse, all of the current tenants were forced to move out, effective the end of February 2023. The reason, and explanation, at the time was as follows: “It is planned to demolish the rental property due to its age, and due to its bad structural condition — and compared to common housing conditions — it has been decided to demolish the property and replace it with a new and bigger apartment building. This, however, will only be possible under the circumstance that all existing rental contracts be terminated.” As an alternative, redevelopment and renovation would be too expensive.

But after months of remaining empty, the house remains standing. One small enquiry by the city faction o9f the AfD [Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany] has now found out that to this day no demolition was ever registered or planned. Additionally, the group “Free Saxons” were able to find out that the placement of asylum seekers was the true plan, so they organized a public protest against it. The AfD suspected that the owner cleared the house of its tenants “under false pretenses”, since asylum seekers are more lucrative tenants — and the question was raised whether the city administration were possibly even privy to this plan.

This is the letter with which previous tenants were shown the door:

Continue reading

Report From Sderot: Day 11

MC is still in Sderot, and the missiles from Gaza are still falling on the city.

Have you noticed that the tide of public opinion is changing, as it usually does, from all-out support to the usual cries of “don’t hurt (Muslim) civilians”?

When Hamas hides behind civilians, then civilian casualties are Hamas’ responsibility. Except, it seems, where Israel and Jews are concerned.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken now appears to be setting conditions.

In a recent X (twitter) catfight two conservatives had a scrap over the fate of Harvard students who signed that infamous letter of support for massacring jooz. “Silly ignorant students,” said one. “Malicious anti-Semites,” said the other.

The real point is that there need to be consequences if freedom of speech is to be viable. If one supports a holocaust-like event, then one is probably a Nazi of some kind. In my experience, Nazis remain Nazis until terminated.

The Left, including Nazism, is a nasty political disease that has brought cruelty and mayhem beyond belief to this world. My wife’s sister has emailed us three times so far to express her support for Hamas against Israeli ‘apartheid’.

Most people are totally ignorant of the inner workings of the original apartheid in South Africa, and the dire consequences of its dismantling.

Apartheid means separation in Afrikaans (die taal), and was an experiment in trying to get differing cultures to live in harmony. It was partially successful until the socialists got hold of it. They turned it into a catastrophe for all concerned.

For example, the African tribesman straight from his kraal expects to be able to defecate anywhere there is room to squat (a bit like San Francisco). This behaviour is not acceptable for the white European-based culture, as they have to deal with the mess. Apartheid dictated that high walls make good neighbours and that these cultural points of friction could be mitigated by ‘separation’.

Unfortunately for South Africa it became all about skin colour, not culture, and the rest is history.

Israel is the most (skin colour) un-racist country I have ever been in. As immigrants from the UK, we stand out as ‘white’ (Anglos), and most Israelis assume that I am American.

Muslim Israelis have exactly the same rights under Basic Law as I have. However, in the areas supervised by the PA (and Hamas) under the Oslo Accords, the same is not true.

Continue reading