It’s the Vax, Stupid!

One of the conclusions emerging from the International Crisis Summit 4 in Bucharest is that the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus actually increased the incidence of mortality due to COVID-19.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Uncut News:

It’s proven! The Covid vaccine caused the emergence of the aggressive variant of the virus

The shocking statistics clearly show that Covid mortality only increased explosively in 2021, the year of mass vaccination of the population. In addition, under pressure from the messenger RNA vaccine, the SARS-Cov-2 virus developed an extremely aggressive form, which led to an increase in mortality. The results were presented at the International Crisis Summit 4in the Romanian Parliament Palace, attended by leading medical experts from around the world.

The highest risk of dying from Covid was in 2021, when the CFR (Case Fatality Rate) was 3.48%, compared to 1.4% in 2020 and less than 1% in 2022 and 2023, when people didn’t get the vaccine. 45-50 days after the first dose of the so-called vaccine, the escalation of cases and deaths began, while in Romania the first dose was administered in the middle of the de-escalation of Covid-19, which contradicts all epidemiological principles, said Dr. Oana Mihaela Secara in her speech at the International Crisis Summit 4, held on November 18 and 19, 2023 at the Palace of the Parliament in Romania.

She pointed out that, according to the epidemiological data collected, the risk of death from Covid-19 in 2021 is reflected by the IFR (infection fatality rate), which corresponds to the CFR: “The IFR is even 3.48%, since most patients report their symptoms and get tested in order to receive six months of freedom through the green certificate.”

In addition, the Delta variant, which developed in the fall of 2021 under the pressure of the so-called vaccine, was aggressive and frightened the population with the number of deaths, this time even “Covid”, according to the Romanian doctor. In the year of the vaccination campaign, Prof. Virgil Paunescu, Vice President of the Academy of Medical Sciences, warned that if the virus is put under pressure, whether through treatments or vaccines, it will seek a way out, with the risk of generating mutations that could be more aggressive. This has already happened.

Health policy has increased mortality

Apart from the official treatment protocols with drugs that do not have a positive impact on the recovery of Covid patients, the biggest problem in 2020 and 2021 was the misguided health policies dictated by the government, says Dr. Oana Mihaela Secara. Assigning Covid patients to single-specialty hospitals, without doctors of other specialities and without medical equipment, allocating fewer places for patients in health centers and ATIs, maintaining a small number of ATI specialists and overloading them have led to a huge increase in mortality.

Continue reading

Meanwhile, in The Netherlands

As expected, there is massive struggle underway in The Netherlands to prevent Geert Wilders from forming a government. Our Dutch correspondent H. Numan has the report.


Dilan Yeşilgöz, the leader of the conservative party VVD, offering her warmest felicitations to congratulate Geert Wilders on his victory

Meanwhile, in The Netherlands

by H. Numan

We’re struggling as usual forming a coalition. Especially as nobody wants to be partner with the PVV party. By ‘nobody’ I mean the established parties that matter. In Dutch we call them ‘regenten‘ (regents); you would call them elites. They’re not just the political parties, but anyone important. The media are firmly against the PVV party. So are higher ranking civil servants, the courts, the press, many businesses — just about anyone of importance. There are, of course, parties that do want to work with the PVV, but they are all small fry. Not enough to form a coalition.

In America you have at least some mainstream media that are conservative. In The Netherlands that’s different. We don’t have any. None whatsoever. Take newspapers, for example. Nearly all Dutch newspapers are now owned by a single wealthy Belgian family or a Belgian company: the van Thillo family and Mediahuis. Together they own more than 90% of all Dutch newspapers. And they are very progressive. Salon socialists, of course. Socialism is, after all, a plaything for the discontented rich.

The NRC-Handelsblad fired the first broadside on the PVV after the elections. They published an article about Gom van Strien, a PVV senator appointed by Geert Wilders as scout. Don’t worry about the man; I never heard of him either. They published that he is currently being prosecuted for fraud. (The original article is behind a paywall.) The man had to resign on Monday. The idea behind it is pretty obvious: we’re going to make it impossible for Wilders to even try to negotiate. Let alone form a coalition.

However, it completely backfired. Geert Wilders struck back. It’s not the first time they’ve tried to block him. He asked Labor/GL politician Ronald Plasterk to scout for him, flabbergasting just about anyone. Who is Plasterk? One of the very few Labor politicians I find acceptable. He was a scientist, a real one, in molecular biology. He changed to politics, and became the (Labor) education and science minister in 2007. He left politics after his tenure, and currently is a professor at the University of Amsterdam. He is quite popular, left and right. That’s unique, and shows his capabilities. Even I find very little wrong with him! What’s even more striking is that he is a columnist for the (somewhat conservative) Telegraaf newspaper, and a popular one at that.

That’s striking back with a vengeance. Wilders didn’t know about the legal proceedings against van Strien. He was unpleasantly surprised to read it in the papers. Mr. van Strien never said anything about it when he accepted the job. What happens with the man is irrelevant for us. Maybe he’s innocent, maybe he’s not. I don’t know. I have yet to meet an honest politician, so I do have my doubts. Maybe he’ll keep his PVV job, probably not. I find it very questionable not to mention you’re currently involved in a trial. However, that is for Wilders to decide. Not me.

Wilders’ counterstroke is masterful. It completely stunned the establishment. By asking a popular (ex) Labor politician they stand, for the moment, powerless. They can’t embarrass Plasterk, as he is one of them. Nor can they prosecute him, as there is nothing to prosecute. He’s clean as a whistle. Even better: he is capable, no-nonsense and knows how to handle people. It’s possible, even likely, he’ll get the job done in a couple of days. Now the ball is back in the elites’ court again. They have to find something else. Don’t worry: they will.

Continue reading

The Greens Want It All

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Party conference in Karlsruhe

The Green Party base wants to stop deportations and abolish “prosperity”

The federal government is moving too far to the right for the Green base. They want to go back to “no person is illegal” and open borders. She wants to take completely new paths in economic policy.

The social debate has changed. The Greens, with their fantasies of open borders, are no longer setting the tone. The Chancellor, a Social Democrat, recently announced deportations “on a large scale”. The Green base is angry. [A large scale? That’s a sick joke, since it will only be 600 additional deportations per year, with a daily influx of over 1,500. Do the math; it’s all hogwash.]

The 49th Green Party Congress begins in Karlsruhe on Thursday evening and could get heated. The party leadership is re-elected, the candidates for the European elections are determined and an associated election program is agreed upon. There are already more than 1,600 amendment requests for this.

The party leadership wrote in the main motion: “We want returns to be carried out in accordance with the rule of law. Not everyone who comes to Germany can stay.” A no-go for the base. [“Base” is the right word for these leeches.] “There are no humane deportations!” says one application. They are always violent and should therefore be rejected. [Don’t let them in in the first place and there will be no violence from their side. Quite simple, Dumbo.]

“No person is illegal” instead of “repatriations”

Even the creation of the word “repatriation” instead of “deportation” would not change this. Rather, one must oppose the “progressive shift to the right”. The human right to asylum and the human right to freedom of movement — probably intended as a synonym for open borders — should not be restricted. “What we should fight for is a change in how we deal with migrants and refugees — towards fighting for every single person to be able to lead a new life here.” [Allahu Akhbar!]

Another amendment is directed against the phrase “humanity and order”. Instead it should say “No person is illegal”. Because people are not illegal, only their behavior can be illegal. For the Green base, unauthorized entry into Germany does not seem to be illegal.

Greens want to abolish “prosperity” [But only for those who aren’t in the higher echelons of the Politburo, and an abysmal “quality of life” will be for the rest.]

The Green base wants to say goodbye to the word “prosperity”. The party leadership named an entire chapter after it: “What Protects Prosperity”. The applicants argue that the term is outdated. As a synonym for material standards and goals, it is incompatible with the election program. Rather, the term “quality of life” should be introduced. Because the new wording contains much more than just material standards. “Healthy nature and food, external, internal and social security” is what the Greens stand for and also the new term quality of life. “It’s also a sign that the goals have to change.”

Continue reading

Soppy

Below is an overview by our Israeli correspondent MC of the current hostage exchange deal between Israel and Hamas.

Soppy

by MC

‘Soppy’ was one of those words of boyhood which described all girls (except the ones that weren’t soppy) and those boys who behaved like the soppy girls.

Soppy boys had difficulty with boyish behaviour, the risky bits like climbing trees and scrumping apples. One of the things we did as boys was to go out on the mud flats and retrieve cannonballs to sell as antiques. There were cannonballs in the mud because HMS Excellent, the Royal Navy gunnery school, was about a mile away and for several hundred years had been shooting live cannonballs whilst teaching sailors how to man the guns.

This was not soppy work. The cannon balls came in different sizes from 4 lbs to 100 lbs, plus, if you were lucky, a spherical (explosive) shell up to ten inches diameter.

Getting the cannonballs meant going out in the mud at least about six inches deep, and if it got soft, one could go in up to the waist. For an 11-year-old boy, handling a 32-pounder in the mud was tricky. One came across a mound about twelve inches across, then hit it with a hammer, and it started to disintegrate. Inside the mound was a six-inch diameter cannonball which then had to be carried to the boat, maybe a hundred yards of hard going in the mud, the extra weight causing one to sink twice as deep. This was not stuff that soppy kids did.

Of course, one now gets soppy politicians. Soppy politicians don’t do the nasty hard bits, but they sit and criticise those that do. Not for them selling cannonballs at 10 pounds a shot (sorry that one just got away from me).

And soppy policemen who beat up on the pro-Israel march because the pro-Hamas marchers will probably hit them back.

Soppy politicians are concerned about ‘innocent civilians’ in Gaza. 60% of said innocent civilians support the actions of Hamas on 7th October, and if appeased, are going to ensure the 10/7 massacre happens on a regular basis. Soppy politicians, male or female, are deadly because they very rarely (if not never) allow their military to finish the job.

General Pershing was the officer in charge of the American Expeditionary Force in France in 1917-18, and he was against the idea of an armistice in November of 1918. His troops were all set to carry the war into Germany to obtain a full surrender rather than an armistice. If the politicians and allied generals had listened, WW2 would probably been avoided.

Same with the Paris Accords of 1972 in which soppy politicians thought they were dealing with ‘gentlemen’ who kept agreements. Within two years, South Vietnam was annihilated…

Curiously, President Roosevelt (and then President Truman) were not so soppy. FDR insisted on unconditional surrender, and President Truman authorised the use of the atomic bombs. There were no comebacks from WW2. Churchill was soppy, and would have accepted another armistice had he not been overruled. The unconditional surrender cost tens of thousands of allied lives and the lives of countless enemy ‘innocent civilians’, children, babies, mothers and fathers.

Israel has been dealing with Gaza since 2006 when they de-occupied it, making it Judenrein as demanded by supposedly anti-fascist forces in Europe and the US. All to begin a cycle of violence in which Hamas strikes Israel, Israel goes into Gaza, and is forced by soppy international politicians to withdraw without settling the issue.

As of writing this essay, that looks to be the scenario we are facing again (this was written before the current imbroglio about hostages).

Hostages make this one very complicated, and in my opinion, the Hamas invasion of October 7th crossed a line, and has to be dealt with, with utmost severity.

The rumour here in Israel is that 10/7 was meant to be a co-ordinated three-prong attack with Hezbollah, the Palestinian Authority in Judea and Samaria, and Hamas all attacking/invading at the same time. That could have been catastrophic.

Continue reading

Landslide Victory for the PVV!

Our Dutch correspondent H. Numan sends this report on yesterday’s stunning general election in The Netherlands.

Landslide victory for the PVV!

by H. Numan

Yesterday we had elections in The Netherlands. The results are mind-boggling. Stunning, completely unexpected. Possibly even revolutionary! Though the most difficult part of the elections will be forming a coalition government. While the establishment has lost the battle, they may almost certainly win the war. Let’s have a look at the elections first.

The PVV won by a landslide. I never expected they would win this big: out of a total of 150, no fewer than 36 seats! The PVV gained a stunning 19 seats. That means they more than doubled, coming from 18 seats. They are, by far, the biggest party now. That doesn’t make Wilders PM automatically. He’ll have to negotiate a coalition. That means other parties must be willing to govern with him. And that can be very difficult, if not outright impossible.

The runner-up is the combination Labor/Communists, PvdA/GL. They won 25 seats, coming from 17 seats. The VVD (they pretend to be our Conservative party) lost a lot; they now hold 24 seats, losing 10 seats. I expected them to lose. In Dutch politics, the party that breaks the coalition pays for it. That’s what the VVD did, dropping from 34 seats to now 24 seats. Pretty big, and something I expected.

Another confirmed loser was D66; they are upper middle-class yuppies who pretend not to be communists. They dropped from 24 seats to 10, losing 14 seats. Given their being the party of utter wokeness, this was fairly certain, too. D66 is a rollercoaster party. One election they are on top; the next one they fall down.

Pieter Omtzigt did well, but not as well as expected. His NSC (New Social Contract, check the link where he found that name) scored only 20 seats. With good reasons: Omtzigt didn’t want to become Prime Minister, he said that during the entire campaign. He never presented a candidate, keeping it a secret. Only at the very last minute did he change his mind to become PM after all. The voters didn’t like that. Another problem for Omtzigt is that he didn’t have a clear program. By being vague you don’t alienate voters; that much is true. But you won’t gain many, either.

The Christian Democrats lost impressively, as everybody expected. Dropping from 15 seats to… five. Before the elections I joked that the only major feat of their new leader, Henri Bontenbal, would be announcing his resignation. Not a joke: he’ll be doing that sometime in the coming days or next week. One cannot lose two-thirds of his seats and remain party leader.

The Farmers Party (BBB) did pretty badly. In percentages their win was huge: no less than 500%. But they only had one seat. Now they have five. They polled about 13 seats, but ran on a one-issue program, focused on farmer problems. Everything else was secondary at best. Yes, most people sympathize with our farmers. Only The Netherlands is not a rural country. Even if all farmers voted for BBB it wouldn’t win them much more. Being vague and disinterested in what city folks want cost them everything.

The two other conservative parties JA21 and FvD were trashed. I expected that. FvD lost four seats, keeping four, and JA21 kept one of their two stolen seats. JA21 is a split-off from FvD. Two splitters Joost Eerdmans and Annabel Nanninga moved out of FvD in 2021, hence the name. Nanninga has some credibility (other than her impressive waistline); Eerdmans is an ambitious politician who jumps from party to party. Wherever he thinks his chances are best. You don’t want that character standing behind you. Neither did the electorate.

FvD is led by Thierry Baudet. He recently made headlines and lost everything by bluntly stating in front of cameras that he didn’t believe in moon landings and doubted 9/11. I’m surprised he was able to keep four seats. A statement like that should give him a straitjacket right away.

The remainder, all small fry, lost or remained the same. But they don’t amount to much, so it doesn’t matter.

What’s next?

In The Netherlands we don’t have a winner-take-all system. We have a representative democracy. Meaning that all parties get seats in relation to their electoral results. If your party scores 10% of the vote, you’ll get 10 seats. Even though Geert Wilders won by a landslide, it’s by no means certain he’ll become prime minister or even part of a cabinet.

Just look at the recent Thai elections. Move Forward won a landslide victory but are still in the opposition, and the leader resigned. He tried his best; twice he presented his plans to parliament. The house accepted his proposals, but the military senators said no. The runner-up was next. They quickly struck a deal with the military and within three days the Srettha cabinet was formed.

Fortunately, things aren’t as grim here. It’ll be difficult to form a coalition, yes. All depends on that Mr. Pieter Omtzigt. If he sticks to the boycott of the PVV, as he said during the campaign, no PM Geert Wilders. However, it isn’t that rosy for a left-wing coalition, either. There is a marginal majority for that, but with four parties. If Omtzigt goes that way, he would lose all credibility. From very popular he would become the most hated politician overnight. The biggest problem here is that he is autistic enough to do that. His policy, within the CDA and later as an independent is: whatever I want, I do. Damn the torpedoes!

There are, based on the results, two workable coalitions possible:

Continue reading

A MAGA Moment for Argentina

As you all know by now, Javier Milei, a self-described anarcho-capitalist, was elected president of Argentina on Sunday. After his victory he was congratulated by Donald Trump, who urged the president-elect to “Make Argentina Great Again”. Well, at least they won’t have manufacture new hats — the existing stock of red MAGA hats should work just fine.

I’d never heard of Javier Milei until a few weeks ago, so I haven’t had time to research him in depth. His meteoric ascent to the top position has alarmed the chattering classes, who have branded him a “populist”. As Power Line notes, “populism is when the wrong person wins an election.” And The Washington Post ascribed his victory to the “rage” felt by voters. If only the electorate weren’t so angry, they would have voted for someone approved of by the talking heads on TV!

The video below from Argentinean TV shows Mr. Milei’s victory speech after his opponent conceded the election. Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Let the Migrants Stay — Kill the Geezers Instead!

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from eXXpress. The translator’s comments are in square brackets. Note: ORF is Österreichischer Rundfunk (Austrian Broadcasting), the state TV service:

ORF broadcaster 3Sat broadcasts: “Instead of deporting migrants: kill everyone over 70”

It’s unbelievable what the fee broadcaster 3Sat, in which the ORF holds a 25% share, is broadcasting: a cabaret artist can suggest not that the illegal immigrants should be deported, but that “everyone over 70 should be killed” — a recommendation for mass murder as an entertainment program.

Something has happened again: just over 24 hours after the ORF’s much-criticized free advertising campaign for the climate hysterics at the Ski World Cup race in Gurgl (Tyrol), the special-interest broadcaster 3Sat, in which the ORF holds a share of at least 25% and in which an ORF manager sits on the station’s management, the next scandal. At 8:15pm, i.e. in prime time, the German cabaret artist Moritz Neumeier (35) is allowed to broadcast his theses about the current asylum situation.

The TV entertainer says: “If you want to get upset about the fact that only a very small group of people are putting a completely above-average strain on the health insurance companies and the doctors’ waiting lists, then you don’t have to deport more people more quickly, but rather Germans over 70… you just kill them.”

The applause was extremely restrained — even with the 3Sat recording, it quickly became clear to many guests that this could be an outrageous recommendation for mass murder.

ORF wants €722 million for such statements

According to Statista, there are currently 18.4 million people over 65 years old living in Germany. The 3Sat comedian can therefore recommend killing several million people, on open stage on TV. And at the same time, apparently no more illegal migrants should be deported from the country.

All of this takes place on a TV channel financed with compulsory TV license fees, in which ORF holds 25%, ZDF and ARD each hold 32.5% and the Swiss SRG holds 10%. [And take a wild guess who watches TV? Exactly, the people that this NAZI wants to murder. Why doesn’t he do his parents a favour and start with himself?]

As already reported, the ORF wants to collect €722 million from January 1st through the new compulsory TV tax, approved by the black-green coalition. €39 million of this will go to the company that is supposed to collect these amounts with full force: Anyone who does not pay the €183.50 will have debt collection agencies sent to their house and then it will be seized. And if there is nothing to seize, then under the new ORF law and the Administrative Procedure Act you could even face prison sentences — anyone who doesn’t want to finance tasteless comedians, old Homer Simpson episodes, fake news about Ukraine and anti-Israel news programs, can even be taken into custody from January 1st. However, dedicated lawyers are already preparing class action lawsuits.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

Brown Border

After a long hiatus, Max Denken returns with a film review that is much more than a review: he has a family connection with the area of Poland that abuts the border with Belarus and is featured in the movie.

Brown Border

by Max Denken

The movie

Tired and jet-lagged upon arrival in Warsaw, I bide the daytime hours. A walking distance from my hotel, a movie theater is playing Green Border, the new film by Polish émigré film director Agnieszka Holland.

America’s most prominent film school and a stab at a Hollywood career are as long behind me as are Holland’s days at the FAMU film school in Prague. I once introduced to a Los Angeles audience Krzysztof Zanussi, the Polish film director with whom, as his assistant director, Holland began her career, but my paths never crossed hers nor did my interests in film or life run parallel. Still, I loved her children’s film The Secret Garden (1993) and, as an animal lover, could identify with her revulsion at a driven hunt’s wholesale slaughter of wildlife in Spoor (2017). I drag myself out of the hotel and go to see Green Border, Holland’s film that had just had its premiere screening at the 80th Venice Film Festival in September, 2023.

What I proceed to endure for two and a half interminable hours is an agitprop salad similar in intent but far below the artistic level of such famous purveyors of film propaganda as Sergei Eisenstein for the Bolsheviks and Leni Riefenstahl for Hitler. There is no story with real human characters in the traditional narrative sense but a weepy outburst about numinous Syrian, Afghan, and African refugees trying to invade Poland’s via its border from Belarus and being brutally repulsed.

The New York Film Festival synopsized the film as, “A Syrian family leaves the violence of their country behind, hoping to cross from Belarus into Poland and then onto the safe haven of Sweden. But, like so many lost souls, they end up caught in a political maelstrom, demonized by the Polish government and press and used as pawns in an inhumane, deadly border game.”

The reality background to Holland’s invention is that in July, 2021, Alexandr Lukashenko, the dictator leader of Belarus, threatened to “flood” the European Union with drugs and migrants and proceeded with this scheme of hybrid warfare. Belarussian agencies in tandem with some Middle Eastern airlines fraudulently promoted easy entry into the EU’s territory and arranged for the delivery of migrants to the Polish-Belarus border. It was an inhumane, cynical ploy probably ordered by Lukashenko’s ally in the Kremlin to either force a stream of undesirables onto Russia’s foe, Poland, or to make Poland look bad if it refused to grant them passage.

A flood of Iraqis, Syrians, Afghans, Congolese, Cameroonians, and Sudanese followed to the forested border. By November 2021, Poland’s border guard had intercepted over 32,000 migrants’ attempts to invade Poland. Having defied the EU’s order to take in a share of Angela Merkel’s invitees since 2015, Poland’s PiS government, to its credit, was not going to yield to this Putin/Lukashenko ploy, either.

And that evidently unleashed in Ms. Holland — daughter of a Polish-Jewish high communist official and notorious European “progressive” — her own flood: that of the maternal bonding female hormone oxytocin. The same one that a group of German — what else — scientists stated in their 2017 paper “Oxytocin-enforced norm compliance reduces xenophobic outgroup rejection “ would reduce “xenophobic outgroup rejection” if administered to all those racist white people who don’t want half a billion African and Middle Eastern Muslim refugees in Europe and North America.

Holland’s migrants are “refugees” and “people like us” — middle class in their countries, handy with English and cellphones, and with means sufficient to have paid the stiff costs of this passage. In reality, they are not like us.

Holland’s Syrian “refugees” are not the stabbers of children in a playground in Annecy or hateful attackers of Jews in Vienna. They are not the Syrian refugees who just in 12 months of 2016/2017, set a homeless man on fire on Christmas in Berlin or, screaming “Allahu Akbar,” attacked and injured four people at a bus station in Lünen. They are not the Syrian refugee who murdered a pregnant woman with a machete and wounded two others at a bus station in Reutlingen.

They are not the Syrian “asylum seeker” who raped a 44-year-old mentally disabled woman in Soest. They are not the 27-year-old Syrian who stabbed and killed a Red Cross mental health counselor in Saarbrücken, or the one who tried to behead 64-year-old Ilona Fugmann who had offered him a job at her beauty salon in Herzberg.

They are not the Syrian “asylum seekers” who were filming and molesting underage girls at a swimming pool in Löbau or the ones who did so in Mariendorf, or the one who sexually assaulted a ten-year-old girl in Tübingen.

Holland’s Syrians are not the “migrant” who went on a “stabbing-spree” on board a train in Bavaria, or the one who attacked passengers on a bus from Berlin to Milan. They are not the “asylum seeker” who blew himself up next to a wine bar in Ansbach and wounded 15 people, or the one in Pittsburgh, who sought to blow up a church for Isis. Nor are they like Abdalfatah who sought refuge in Germany after murdering 36 people in Syria for the Jabhat al-Nusra jihadist group.

No, they are just a cute family with a genial grandpa, a well-married couple, and their nice boy, little girl, and a baby. Not even a Syrian “refugee” family where the father murders his wife because she irritated him, or murders his wife and two daughters and leaves them dead in a freezer.

Holland’s Afghan refugees in the film consist of one English-speaking, kind woman who “helped the Americans” during the Afghanistan war. In reality, Afghan rapefugees sow terror in the heart of Europe’s women. They rape and murder. Again and again, everywhere in Europe, solo and in groups, boasting of it on Facebook, the victim alternately an adult, girl, or boy.

Holland’s sole Afghan is not the 19-year-old Afghan “asylum seeker” who stabbed three people in Ravensburg, or the 41-year-old who murdered a five-year-old Russian boy and severely wounded his mother in Arnschwang, or the one whose sexual intercourse with a woman in Limerick included stabbing her to death in a “frenzied attack “. Nor is she portraying the Afghan migrant who murdered two people in Serbia and then one in Britain, or the one who stabbed seven people in Sweden. Just a kind, educated, Afghan woman mistreated by Polish goons-in-uniform.

Holland’s Africans are not the testosterone-filled, young primitives landing on Europe’s shores by the hundreds of thousands and terrorizing the local population, roasting cats, brandishing their penises or defecating in public, brawling and destroying property incessantly and everywhere. One ought to check out the @RadioGenoa account on X to see much evidence of what they are about. But for Holland they are just a couple of nice, well-behaved teens.

The border has a barbed wire fence. Those nice Syrians, Africans, and one nice lady from Afghanistan are trying repeatedly to breach that fence and each time are repulsed by pitiless, all-black (in character) goons serving as Poland’s Border Patrol. When on the staging side of the barbed wire fence, they are exploited and humiliated by even worse Belarussian goons-in-uniform, and then pushed through that fence into a country whose Border Patrol pushes them back.

They are hungry, thirsty, cold. Some are sick. But then, before Western progressives decided that reality is optional, the law of the Universe has always been that one suffers the consequences of one’s mistakes. Few mistakes can be as bad as to have traveled from faraway Asia and Africa to the Polish border in the belief that it will give way.

Eventually, some manage to get through the fence and, after more harrowing adventures like drowning in a swamp, are aided by a group of young Polish radicals, given food, medical treatment, and shelter and transportation deeper into Poland in the approving glow of the demiurge of this moral fantasy: Agnieszka Holland.

Holland portrays the enforcers of Poland’s territorial sovereignty as primitive cartoon villains, pitiless at the bottom, and fascist at the top. The bottom is the Polish Border Patrol that has no pity even for pregnant women. They toss one over the fence back onto Belarus soil and manhandle many others. Their officer shouts that the pitiful group of migrants mired between the barbed wire and the swamp are “not people” but bullets fired into the heart of Poland.

The only border guard portrayed with sympathetic shading is Jan, whose wife is pregnant and disapproving of his “brutal” occupation. Jan initially participates in the pushback actions but is gradually sickened by the required violence and softens to the point of pretending not to see “migrants” transported into Poland’s interior by another kind Pole.

At the top are the “fascists” — Poland’s slightly right-of-center PiS ruling party that has given the finger to the European Union’s demands for absorbing a “fair share” of the kind of “refugees” that Angela Merkel and the EU were importing by the millions before Lukashenko decided to give them more of their medicine.

Holland, along with most of Poland’s cultural elite, is an outspoken, leftist enemy of PiS — the party that has said No to invaders from alien cultures. She has gone so far into the swamp of “progressive” hysteria that one of her two more developed “good-guy” characters, Bogdan, tells his therapist that he cannot stand the “Nazis” marching in Warsaw under the protection of the “fascist” government — a lie so grotesque as to indicate the warped furniture in Ms. Holland’s brain. Bogdan confesses as well that because of those Polish “Nazis” and fascists he is impotent, cannot sleep, eat, or think.

Vitality returns to Bogdan’s so-dreary life with a loving family in a luxurious villa near Warsaw when he too engages in the “activist” effort. He and his wife and children host three young North-African migrants just smuggled in from the border, invite them to their dinner table, and so on. In a scene characteristic of the twisted minds of Holland and white progressives everywhere, Bogdan’s sons bond with the Africans by joining them in a French rap.

For the white rich kids, knowing French is normal. But what’s more telling is that they, Poles far removed from Africa, have adopted the black culture and they rap in French as expertly as their African guests do. In Poland.

It would never have occurred to Holland to write the scene in the opposite way, with the African guests making an effort to adapt to the culture of their hosts and singing with them a Polish song with the harmonies that are Europe’s culture heritage.

Julia is the other more developed “good guy” character. She is Bogdan’s psychologist and Zoom interlocutor. Moved by the plight of the migrants in the forest near her home, Julia turns from a bystander to a committed rescuer working with the younger activists to smuggle as many migrants into Poland as possible. Maja Ostaszewska, who plays Julia, is a well-known “progressive” and major pro-migrants activist in Poland.

The rest of the positive characters are the bleeding-heart Polish volunteers who help the migrant invaders and made it past the border fence. They are all unalloyed cartoon goodness just as the border guards and policemen who are the barrier against the invaders are the unalloyed evil.

I have written a book and several articles about the horrors that refugees, “refugees,” and migrants from Asian Muslim countries and Africa inflict on Europe. I saw this film while a true African invasion was landing on the beaches of Lampedusa. I am writing this in November, when that invasion is continuing while huge crowds of Muslim imports are marching and rioting all over Europe and the entire Anglosphere, waving black jihad flags, shouting “Death to the Jews,” and generally behaving in ways not seen since the Kristallnacht. I am appalled at Holland’s specious propaganda masquerading as a film drama, her smearing of the one, rare state sane enough to have resisted to rush to self-obliteration, her libelous depiction of the Polish Border Patrol.

I am therefore renaming Green Border as Brown Border. The brown adjective comes from my long-ago Hollywood mentor, an Irish curmudgeon who had elbowed his way to a position of influence in that Jewish-founded-and-dominated industry. Art had long-ago mastered Yiddish, so he taught me some. When it came to a lousy film, hackneyed book, or a revolting painting, he invariably called it dreck. When it came to a lousy human being, he reverted to his native Irish brogue: shite.

Whether dreck or shite, it’s the same color. Green Border is not a work of art but a lying, hysterical outpouring of agitprop by a female raised in a privileged communist home, favoring her ideology over reality, and attacking a polity that, since 1989, no longer adheres to diktats of the Comintern. It’s par for the course that the World Socialist Website attacked Holland’s detractors in a headline reading “The Polish far-right’s vicious campaign against Agnieszka Holland’s film ‘The Green Border’ replete with ‘ antisemitic and fascistic undertones against the film’.”

The reality

Something needs to be said about those “bullets into the heart of Poland” — words that Holland put in the mouth of the Border Guard’s commander, no doubt to imply that he is the epitome of evil. In reality, those words are appropriate and would have been even if the border-busting migrants consisted mostly of women, children and kind men — which they didn’t.


A still frame from Zielona Granica (Green Border) shown on the web page of the 2023 Venezia Biennale film festival.


The Poland-Belarus border, with the actual menacing migrants trying to force it.

One now has ample opportunities to see what happens to countries that had a more tenderhearted approach to Muslim refugees and “refugees.” Here is Berlin and here is London. Or New York, or Dearborn, or a hundred other cities in the pathologically altruist West. A European or Europeans-founded country signs its death warrant even if taking in African and Asian Muslim women and children, let along young, military-age men who are the great majority of the invaders.

Continue reading

“We Are in the Middle of the Fight for Our Lives”


Julian Reichelt is a German journalist who used to work for Bild, but was fired after being accused of sexual harassment. He now presides over a YouTube show called “Achtung Reichelt”, and is also associated with the online news portal Nius.

The following episode of “Achtung Reichelt” discusses the recent urban ferment in Germany, in which Hamas supporters have taken over public spaces to chant about free Palestine and call for the death of the Jews. The crisis is compounded by growing public awareness that all those millions of third-world immigrants can never be “integrated”.

Many thanks to Oz-Rita for the translation, Brunhilde for the timing, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Bad Juju in Bad Ischl

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from eXXpress. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Explosive argument: Big fuss over pork slogan in front of restaurant in Bad Ischl

Excitement in Bad Ischl! The trigger is a host known for his funny sayings. His text about people who eat pork is explosive. And in the eyes of some, it went too far, given the already tense political climate. Others agree with the restaurant owner.

A sign outside his restaurant reads: “People who eat pork are statistically less likely to blow themselves and others up.” A provocation that is of course primarily aimed at Muslims. There is already a lot of excitement online, where pictures of the saying are spreading rapidly. Some feel “deeply disappointed and attacked”, others see “pure racism”. [Islam is an ideology and not a race, MORON.] In a free newspaper, a reader said that reading this text took his breath away, and called for “messages of peace;” after all, the situation was already very tense. [Appeasing Islam has worked so well for us during the last 1,400+ years, hasn’t it? Are people really that willfully blind and ignorant of what Islam and its followers stand for?]

Lots of approval online

However, the opinions are not as clearly distributed as the rapporteurs want to convey. If you look at the comment columns, it is quite clear that the innkeeper also receives a lot of support. “It’s a bit harsh, but unfortunately he’s right,” says one user on Facebook. “Sometimes the truth hurts,” writes another. “He’s absolutely right,” many people say.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

International Law or Sordid Double Standards

As the bloody conflict in Gaza rages, the more important war is the propaganda war, which Hamas is handily winning, thanks to the help of Western progressives, especially in the universities. Our Israeli correspondent MC sends his observations on these grim events.

International Law or Sordid Double Standards

by MC

Nobody applies ‘international laws, rules and standards’ to Hamas, and we must ask ourselves: Why not?

The first obvious answer is that Hamas is a terrorist group and just does not care about ‘infidel’ morality. Their standards are defined in the Koran, the Sunnah and the Hadith, not in anything coming out of Geneva.

In Europe prior to the Treaty of Westphalia, the whole of the continent was torn apart by religions which were, in fact, political entities, and which recognized no national boundaries. For each religious sect, Catholic and Protestant alike, the ends — i.e. absolute power over the other — justified the means used to get it. Forget do as you would be done by.

That had to stop, and the religious zeal (and personal ambition) eventually had to be tempered by biblical imperatives to ‘love your enemies’. In Christianity the central character was truly a man of peace. Trying to justify a barbaric war of mass extermination against another ‘Christian’ sect proved to be impossible, and the men of conscience finally prevailed.

Thus “Jaw Jaw, not War War” became important.

The wars of the 20th century dictators followed. WW1 was a war of trenches, machine guns and artillery, with a an act of gross stupidity at its beginning. Not so much the assassination of Arch Duke Franz Ferdinand, but the follow-up assumption that the Serbian government did it, and the terrible ultimatum issued by Austria-Hungary on the assumption of said ‘guilt’.

The WW2 was the result of the Central Powers failing to learn the lessons of the first war. The Nazis combined a sense of victimhood and resentment arising from WW1 with a schadenfreude of an immortal, undefeatable mythological Volk proclaiming the Germanic people’s right to rule, enslave, occupy and exterminate. To generally play god…

But Islam does not go by Christian norms, and the separation of mosque and state is not even contemplated.

Many people do not believe that the events of 7th October actually took place. I do; I was there. I heard the massacre in Sderot and I saw the aftermath. My son was about three minutes behind the pickup trucks loaded with AK-shooting terrorists.

He was in shock for a week.

Many blame nationalism for WW2, and have striven ever since for globalist socialism based on Marxist principles. But what if the ‘nationalism’ in National Socialism was actually benign, and that it was the ‘socialism’ part that caused all the problems and the huge death toll? It is only then we can suddenly understand that global Marxism is a catastrophe of epic proportions and that the utopia it is meant to bring is nothing but a cruel and impossible pipe dream.

Continue reading

Biden Administration Focuses on ‘Islamophobia’ While Jew-Hatred Runs Rampant

The following report by Clare Lopez was published earlier this month by Sharia TipSheet.

Biden Administration Focuses on ‘Islamophobia’ While Jew-Hatred Runs Rampant

by Clare M. Lopez

Not even a month after the horrific Sabbath Massacre by HAMAS jihadis on 7 October 2023, and as venomous Jew-hatred runs rampant on campuses and streets across America, the Biden administration thinks it appropriate to unveil “the first ever US National Strategy to Counter Islamophobia”

“White House slammed for ‘tone deaf’ unveiling of anti-Islamophobia strategy as antisemitism surges” by Victor Nava at The New York Post, 2 November 2023

“White House Announces Anti-Islamophobia Strategy Amid Large Spike In Antisemitism” by Reagan Reese at Daily Caller, 2 November 2023

Statement from White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on President Biden’s Establishment of First-Ever National Strategy to Counter Islamophobia”, White House Statement, November 1, 2023

The Biden Administration is riddled with officials who loathe Israel, Judaism, and the Jewish people. Hard to believe this is a vetting failure. With friends like these…

“Homeland Security officer on leave after it was revealed she worked for PLO and wrote ‘F**k Israel’ post” by Yaron Steinbuch at The New York Post, October 19, 2023

“After exposure, Biden regime puts pro-Hamas ‘F**k Israel’ PLO spokeswoman at DHS on leave” by Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch, October 19, 2023

“DHS worker and former Palestinian Liberation spokeswoman Nejwa Ali is put on leave after praising Hamas terrorist attacks and saying ‘F*** Israel…we are ready for your downfall’“ by Noa Halff at Daily Mail, October 19, 2023

“Former PLO Spokeswoman Tweets ‘F*** Israel’ While Working at DHS. Heritage Demands Answers.” by Tyler O’Neil at the Daily Signal, October 19, 2023

Continue reading

The German State Pays the Jizya

The following report highlights the lavish benefits provided by the German government to an Afghan migrant, evidently one of the translators who worked for NATO and escaped the country before the fall of Kabul. The Afghan and his family receive all sorts of state stipends and subsidies. He is well-educated, but chooses not to get a job. He wants to pursue a master’s degree instead.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating both the video and the article from eXXpress, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for subtitling the video:

The translated article:

Report about money for asylum families: TV station deletes entire program from the network

This RTL report has it all: A camera team visited a family of four Afghans at their home in Germany. They net €3,200 net per month — financed by the taxpayer. This sparked heated debates on social media. Too fierce? In any case, the TV station deleted the article from the media library.

The Afghan family of four welcomes the TV team in a four-room apartment of 120 square meters (1300 sq.ft.
in Schwäbisch Gmünd. The head of the family, the father, was a German translator in Afghanistan. He reports that his family is “very happy” with the situation. No wonder, since the authorities are giving him and his wife every opportunity to learn, live and look after their children. The monthly income of the Afghans is €3,200 — net, of course.

€80,000 in two years

In the past two years, German taxpayers have supported the migrant family with a total of €80,000. There are also kindergarten places for the little ones. Money for local public transport, various health costs and German courses are also paid for. German courses for a man who worked as a translator for five years? This question remains unanswered. Does the family plan to look for work soon? “No, because I’m still trying to learn German better,” said the Afghan.

Work? “We don’t feel like it”

After that, perhaps a degree course followed by a master’s degree, because he attended a university in his home country and he and his wife wanted to become diplomats. Of course, the need for Afghan diplomats in Germany is negligible, as many subscribers on the Internet note. The reactions to the report are violent, and the fuss about benefits for families unwilling to work is enormous. The video is still available on platforms like X, but it has already been deleted from RTL itself.

[Video on Twitter]

Herrmann Gaugeler, head of the “Welcome Center” in Schwäbisch Gmünd, was also interviewed by the TV station. He notes that the Afghan interpreter may have to take on another job if his diplomatic career doesn’t work out soon.

The disappointed Afghan: “No, I’m not willing!” The wife sees it similarly, and explains that they didn’t work as craftsmen back home. “We have no experience and no desire! We also have a lot to do at home. We still need time to spend with our children.”

[Screen shot]

The RTL Extra report — from October 24, 2023, broadcast at 10:00 p.m. — is no longer available in the media library.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

Report From Sderot: Three Weeks

Tanks have rolled into Gaza: the latest from MC.

Report From Sderot: Three Weeks

by MC

It is hard for most people to assimilate that ‘moderate’ Muslims are either playacting, or they are bad Muslims who do not respect the Koran, Hadith or Sunna.

It is also hard for them to understand that most people are brainwashed, some by their cultural norms, others by exposure to incessant TV propaganda. Until my early twenties, I was a socialist because I knew no other influence. I had never met a true conservative and my pro-Nazi aunt and uncle were Nazi socialists — very confusing until I realized that the socialism in National Socialism was not only real but substantial.

Muslim National Socialism gets an easy ride in the USA. Islam looked at the stupidity of ‘anti-Semitism’ and groups like the ADL who picked up on every possible nuance of (possibly accidental) Jew abuse, and squealed vociferously. They decided that they, too, needed to create their own parallel dialogue in order to give themselves victim status, and to distract idiotic attention away from Islamic warmongering, violence and terrorism.

The gullible fell for it, hook, line and stinker. ‘Islamophobia’ came into the world in a miasma of lies and deceits. People who fear Islam are not phobic: Islam is currently engaged in about 50 conflicts around the world, and in nearly all of them the Muslims are the aggressors, the occupiers and the persecutors. Islam is a religion of war, occupation and forced conversion at sword point.

Yesterday evening the bombardment of Gaza intensified, and it appears the tanks went in.

But also, the road blocks around Sderot have disappeared. The IDF are satisfied that all the terrorists have now been rounded up.

It is sad to see that some 50% of Americans between the ages of 18 and 24 support Hamas and the Palestinians. Strange, because the Palestine Authority hates Hamas, even if it falls short of openly criticising them. Isn’t ignorance bliss!

Back to the propaganda: one of the problems is that when the government lies to ‘we the people’ it undermines society in a big way, and support for Hamas at the student level can be regarded as a huge conspiracy theory based upon the idea that the ‘Palestinians’ were forcibly ejected from their own country.

The Palestine Liberation Organisation was an invention of the KGB in 1963. Before that, Palestinians were Jews born and raised in Palestine Mandate territory. Between the wars, as a consequence of the defeat of the Ottomans and the removal of their colonies in the Levant, Britain was made responsible for the development of the mandated territory as a Jewish homeland. But Britain had no intention of allowing Jewish home rule because Ben Gurion and Weizmann were proto-communists, and Israel was strategically placed as the Doorway to India. They gave 78% of the territory mandated for Jews to the ‘Palestinians’ and set the Hashemites (the Lawrence of Arabia crowd) over them.

Britain then populated the remaining mandate Palestine with Muslims from the surrounding lands instead of the Jews they were mandated to settle. My wife’s grandfather’s brother from Baghdad tried to emigrate to the new ‘Jewish’ homeland but was rejected by the British (circa 1933). He apparently went across to the other queue where Muslims were being processed (in Arabic) and gained entry without difficulty.

Continue reading