Let the Migrants Stay — Kill the Geezers Instead!

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from eXXpress. The translator’s comments are in square brackets. Note: ORF is Österreichischer Rundfunk (Austrian Broadcasting), the state TV service:

ORF broadcaster 3Sat broadcasts: “Instead of deporting migrants: kill everyone over 70”

It’s unbelievable what the fee broadcaster 3Sat, in which the ORF holds a 25% share, is broadcasting: a cabaret artist can suggest not that the illegal immigrants should be deported, but that “everyone over 70 should be killed” — a recommendation for mass murder as an entertainment program.

Something has happened again: just over 24 hours after the ORF’s much-criticized free advertising campaign for the climate hysterics at the Ski World Cup race in Gurgl (Tyrol), the special-interest broadcaster 3Sat, in which the ORF holds a share of at least 25% and in which an ORF manager sits on the station’s management, the next scandal. At 8:15pm, i.e. in prime time, the German cabaret artist Moritz Neumeier (35) is allowed to broadcast his theses about the current asylum situation.

The TV entertainer says: “If you want to get upset about the fact that only a very small group of people are putting a completely above-average strain on the health insurance companies and the doctors’ waiting lists, then you don’t have to deport more people more quickly, but rather Germans over 70… you just kill them.”

The applause was extremely restrained — even with the 3Sat recording, it quickly became clear to many guests that this could be an outrageous recommendation for mass murder.

ORF wants €722 million for such statements

According to Statista, there are currently 18.4 million people over 65 years old living in Germany. The 3Sat comedian can therefore recommend killing several million people, on open stage on TV. And at the same time, apparently no more illegal migrants should be deported from the country.

All of this takes place on a TV channel financed with compulsory TV license fees, in which ORF holds 25%, ZDF and ARD each hold 32.5% and the Swiss SRG holds 10%. [And take a wild guess who watches TV? Exactly, the people that this NAZI wants to murder. Why doesn’t he do his parents a favour and start with himself?]

As already reported, the ORF wants to collect €722 million from January 1st through the new compulsory TV tax, approved by the black-green coalition. €39 million of this will go to the company that is supposed to collect these amounts with full force: Anyone who does not pay the €183.50 will have debt collection agencies sent to their house and then it will be seized. And if there is nothing to seize, then under the new ORF law and the Administrative Procedure Act you could even face prison sentences — anyone who doesn’t want to finance tasteless comedians, old Homer Simpson episodes, fake news about Ukraine and anti-Israel news programs, can even be taken into custody from January 1st. However, dedicated lawyers are already preparing class action lawsuits.

Afterword from the translator:

“What is happening to our young people? They disrespect their elders, they disobey their parents. They ignore the law. They riot in the streets inflamed with wild notions. Their morals are decaying. What is to become of them?” — Socrates

“Honour your father and your mother, that your days may be long in the land that the Lord your God is giving you.” — Exodus 20:12

What seems to be largely unnoticed by the German public is — Mr. Wüst (MP NRW) discovered it — that an illegal immigrant costs on average €1,666 per month (notice the last three numbers?). And after 45 years of working and contributing into the Pension fund, a male pensioner receives a pension of €1,543 per month. After 45 years a female pensioner receives a pension of €1,322 a month. And from that they still have to pay health insurance and taxes along with all the other costs. The illegal immigrant receives more money from the German state than a pensioner, and has never paid into the system.

Conclusion: This so called “comedian” Neumeier and those migrants he loves so much are superfluous and expendable.

16 thoughts on “Let the Migrants Stay — Kill the Geezers Instead!

  1. After white capitalism, red communism, black fashism – comes the last green horse of the Apocalypse, and its rider – Death.

    None of the global “ideologies” of the past were preoccupied with Death, though they killed many, killing was not their goal, only a means to an end.

    How very different is the current “Green Ideology”, which actually wants to kill: From abortion to euthanasia… And they are such great friends with Muslims who also carry the green flag…

    To a secular observer this might look like some crazy accident. But it isn’t. The Pale Horse of the Apocalypse is closing in…

      • Can you prove it?

        Armies of heaven ride “white horses” (Revelation 19)

        The “faithful and true” rider from Revelation 19, however, has different attributes than the rider from Revelation 6, who carries a Bow and goes out conquering and to conquer.

        IMHO – the first white horse of the Apocalypse carries a fallen angel, some guy who has just “one crown”, the Ruler of this World – maybe?

  2. Re: “Let the Migrants Stay — Kill the Geezers Instead!”

    Any society which acquiesces to abortion-on-demand must sooner or later come around to euthanasia for the elderly. It is as inevitable as night following day. Once the moral barrier to killing one’s fellow human beings is breached, anything can happen.

    In Germany, for some years now, the government has funded housing for the elderly, apartments and other accommodations for senior citizens. In fact, such arrangement s have been held-up as evidence of the moral superiority of European society as compared to the U.S. and other “less enlightened” places.

    But lo-and-behold, the authorities are now displacing ~ throwing out ~ those elderly pensioners and whatnot and giving their housing to “migrants,” a euphemism all know to be synonymous with the Muslims from Turkey, Syria, and elsewhere who have flooded into Germany in such numbers in recent years.

    While throwing someone out of their home does not kill the elderly so impacted, per se, it is astonishingly cruel and heartless. If I were an elderly German so abused, I would refuse to pay my taxes and then raise holy heck with anyone who would listen. And if the police arrested me and threw me in jail, well, at least I’d have a roof over my head and three hot meals a day. There’s more than one way to beat the system…

    I used to mourn the decline and eventual death of western civilization, but if this sort of barbaric behavior is what lies in store, perhaps I ought to change my thinking. Is any society which does this to its weakest and most-vulnerable citizens even worth saving in the first place?

    • The world is full of paradoxes:

      Communism was build around the idea of “mandatory charity”, and produced frauding, thieving, untrustworthy populations who never share anything with anyone, because they themselves are poor.

      Capitalism was build around “self interest” – and bloomed with trustworthy individuals who share their wealth through “tips in the restaurants”, to say the least.

      These new “Green Politicians” – and the “Green Youth” – see taking care of the elderly as an “expense that can be done without”.

      All they get are the rich and wealthy elderly – who will never “trickle down” their wealth to the young, because they are worried for their future, and the young end up significantly poorer.

      What goes around, comes around.

      PS: I live on an old farm, the building is about 300 years old. The traditional setup is – one small house for the old, one big house for the young… And then the stables and the barns behind it…

      The young would be out in the field during the day, so the old would take care of the “housed animals” and the children.

      IMHO – no one has come with a better system, yet.

      The old people who live in the homes for the “elderly” – are poor souls who are happy to see any young and lively person, once a day.. It is such a sad existence, like a concentration camp for the old.

      Some say that the “Homes for the Elderly” are a revenge of the young for “Kindergardens” and “Schools”. You put your children away to be taken care of by strangers. Your children will put you away – to be taken care of by strangers. What an unhappy existence, for all…

      • @ Barn Swallow

        Your comments are so true regarding the warehousing of the young and old. A member of my family comes from a small rural farming community out on the Great Plains here in the ‘States, and they still hold to the old ways there. One of the tragedies of the decline of the independent Americans farmer (and those in other nations as well) is that the life those people led was both a good one and a productive one.

        The best thing for everyone, if it is possible, is for the old to be at home at the end of their lives. On a farm with multiple generations, living that way was possible if the family was big-enough. As you stated, the children and old folks at home, while the young and working age worked in the fields, attended school, etc. That way the older folks ~ grandma and grandpa ~ could participate in raising the young ones.

        I don’t anymore, but at one time worked in a hospital in direct patient care, and there is nothing sadder than an old and very sick person ending their lives alone and cutoff from their loved ones.

        Re: “Capitalism was build around “self interest” – and bloomed with trustworthy individuals who share their wealth through “tips in the restaurants”, to say the least.”

        The original idea, before the “greed is good” types perverted the message in the 1980s, was ~ and I’m speaking of the ‘States here ~ enlightened self-interest, which is very different than the raw selfishness by preached by the sharks on Wall St.

        The moral ecosystem which used to exist in the U.S. many years ago, but hasn’t in a long time… held that self-interest was well-and-good in its sphere, but that it ought to be balanced against competing goods and virtues in an enlightened manner. I’ve leave that for the philosophers to sort out, but if my understanding of the Founders is correct, that is what they meant.

        I agree with your observations about children and schools, too. These are all some of the costs, direct and indirect, of living in the industrial age where people no longer worked on land they owned or in their own businesses, but instead commuted to work at giant office buildings or in factories owned by others. Leaving mom and the kids behind, and so on.

        That system worked for a while in the early-mid 20th century, but it doesn’t really seem to work as well anymore, but I could be wrong. I’m not really privy to that sort of lifestyle myself anymore.

        • Yes I guess “enlightened self-interest” is a better word for what I meant to say.

          Also “Capitalism” is not such a good word, because it includes the monopoly and stock market “capitalists” who are not really “fair”, but could be described as fraudsters and thieves who tap money through cracks in “justice”…

          Maybe what I wanted to say was “free trade competition” 🙂

          As for the “kids to school and parents to work…”

          “That system worked for a while in the early-mid 20th century, but it doesn’t really seem to work as well anymore”

          In my opinion – it is because originally the system was “meant to be good” – at least in my “Austro-Hungarian” part of the world, Schools used to be really meant to “teach”.

          In the Czech Republic – the old Austro Hungarian model lasted until 1989 – but after the Velvet revolution, it has been dismantled in worst kinds of ways…

          My grandma was a nurse her whole life. She finished a 3 year “nursing high school” when she was 16, and off she went nursing. She knew how to put bandages on, stick needles in arms, she was even taught latin terms because doctors used latin back then.

          Today – kids are made to stay in “Elementary school” until they are 16, classes are packed with disabled and mentally challenged “inclusion kids”… The old “Mathemathic, History, Physics, Languages, Chemistry, Music and physical education” – has turned into a mud of confusing “courses” that just last forever, and teach nothing.

          My grandma would leave school by 1 o’clock. Todays kids are made to stay in school until 4.

          And still – the education is worse and worse…

          So – today, after the “future nurses” leave “elementary school” at 16, they go on 4 more years in nursing school. They get out into the “real world” when they are 19, 20, and after that they need more courses and “education” just to be accepted as nurses into hospitals.

          And when they get working, they don’t even know that their primary purpose is to clean up after sick people and help the doctors.

          I may be wrong about the exact ages kids get off of schools these days – but I know that “schooling” is getting longer and longer, kids are made to stay in school for more and more hours – but the quality of the young “graduates” is falling off a cliff – fast.

          Even one of my bosses in telecom industry complained just recently, that he does not know where to get solid young workers. And telecom pays hard money – it is not “nursing”. Thats where we are – in Europe, these days.

    • The government TV people constantly demand to tax everyone who has a smartphone, but they get quite a friction from citizens who are not happy about all this, so as far as I know, they have not succeedet to tax everyone – yet.

    • They jailed a few years ago a guy in Germany for 2 years for refusing to pay that tax.
      He didn’t even own a TV, Radio, Computer or any other device to receive anything over the Air or the Internet.
      He had a place of his own, and that is apparently enough.

  3. Was there any reaction to his comments? People used to complain about anything and everything on TV. Do they just watch whatever garbage is shoveled at them, without even the option of turning the damn TV off? I couldn’t find out much about him online, except that he’s a supposed “comedian” (another Zelensky?), his comments were supposedly “satirical,” he’s physically repulsive, and has a wife and 3 children. That’s REALLY depressing.

  4. By way of explanation of 3sat:
    3sat is a joint TV channel of ORF (Austrian Broadcasting Corporation), ZDF (German television) and SRF (Swiss Broadcasting Corporation).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.