Category Archives: MSM Prevarications

The VVD is a Criminal Organization

Posted on by

Our Dutch correspondent H. Numan reports on the latest sordid political scandal from The Netherlands.

The VVD (Dutch Conservatives) is a criminal organization

by H. Numan

We have had a bit of a ruckus going on for a fortnight straight. Two weeks ago the new cabinet was grilled by Parliament. We have a three star Michelin chef specialized in grilling: Geert Wilders. He wasn’t too happy with the presence of Ms. Soumaya Sahla in the VVD, and in Parliament. Of course everybody was mortified by his words. How dare he? The tone was not right. We don’t talk about things like that here. Geert introduced three non-confidence votes. All — of course — failed.

Who is this rose of the desert, Ms. Soumaya Sahla? She is a convicted terrorist. She was member of the mohammedan Hofstadgroep or Residence gang. This gang murdered Theo van Gogh. They planned to execute Geert Wilders, Ayaan Hirsi Ali and many others. The gang was tracked down and cornered in an apartment. The police had to lay siege and use heavy weapons to arrest them. Sahla was arrested and convicted of terrorism. She appealed her sentence and was given more jail time on appeal. That is highly unusual. Especially since we’re talking about a woman and a muslima. Dutch courts are invariably very woman- and muslim-friendly, after all. The court stated that her regret was insincere. So insincere that the court decided to give her a little extra. In all, she served 3.5 years in a maximum security prison.

Now it gets interesting. After her release from jail she joined the VVD. Technically, that was not even possible. Why? Because if you want to actively join a political party you have to show a certificate of good behavior. Not just if you want to join a political party, but basically everywhere. You can’t get a job as a cleaner without one.

Sahla can’t get a verklaring omtrend het gedrag, as she is a convicted criminal. Yet she was able to join the VVD. Not only that, she had a meteoric career in it. Her mentor was Frits Bolkestein, the former leader of the party. How was that possible? Well, let’s discreetly say young women have something randy old goats greatly desire. And this randy old goat had something Sahla greatly desired. The power to wave away nasty bureaucratic rules that benefit no one.

It gets even better. Sahla was even able to blow herself into the security and terrorism committee of the VVD, because of her patron. The big bad wolf blew the houses of straw and sticks. But Sahla blows a lot better! Joining a parliamentary security committee requires — if your mouth isn’t as versatile as that of our lovely desert rose — clearance by the AIVD, our version of the FBI. That’s an automatic process. However, Frits Bolkestein was powerful enough to get her that clearance. All this went on for years without problems. Until the parliamentary debate.

Geert Wilders complained loudly about it. He had to sit next to a convicted terrorist who had actually planned to kill him. What did the prime minister plan to do about that? Why was his security detail not informed? And more. Much more. It was kind of impossible for the prime minister to pretend he didn’t know about it, as the affair had been going on for years. Right under his nose. So his defense, and that of his coalition as well as his opposition cronies, was to vilify Wilders for the tone of his questioning.

You think that was all? Nope. The media knew all about it. They simply kept it out of the news. The media knew at least six months ago this affair was going to blow up. Yet they kept it under a cast iron lid. Until they couldn’t anymore, which was when Wilders asked his questions.

First the VVD tried to look the other way. Nothing to see folks, move along! Next, they erased Soumaya Sahla from their intelligence web page, without actually removing her from the intelligence committee. Sahla refused to resign. A few days later her mug shot was back online, but not for long. Under much pressure the VVD had to cave in and regretfully accept the resignation of Sahla. Who had to be carried out of the building kicking and screaming. Of course it has nothing to do with Wilders. It was because of undue media attention and a massive public outcry, what else?

Continue reading →

An Appeal From a Canadian Trucker

Posted on by

In the following video a Canadian trucker from the Freedom Convoy makes an appeal to everyone who sympathizes with the cause — not just Canadians — to take meaningful action in support of the truckers, even if it’s just to write a letter to a legislative representative or head of state:

Hat tip: Vlad Tepes.

“Canada Has Been Usurped by a Maoist”

Posted on by

An Interview With Vlad Tepes

Vlad lives in Ottawa, so he has been at the epicenter of the Freedom Convoy action from the moment the trucks began rolling onto Parliament Hill a week ago. He has been down there every day, mingling with the protesters in the bitter cold.

I sent the following questions to him last night, and his answers are below.

The news media are filtering out anything that reflects positively on the Freedom Convoy. Some news reports say the number of protesters on Parliament Hill has dwindled, and is down to 200 or so. Is that accurate?

It isn’t really like that. The first weekend, which was the 30th and 31st, had not that many trucks but a crazy huge number of people. Tens of thousands for sure. Maybe over 100,000 people. There would have been way more trucks, but every device they could think of was used to prevent trucks from getting to Ottawa and downtown. Many more than are in Ottawa are still held up on old roads and farms. But I was there today at Parliament, and there were three times as many trucks as when the protest started. There were a few hundred people, but it was a Wednesday afternoon. I am told that this coming weekend should see a record number of protestors. More even than last weekend. Keep in mind it was below zero F on Saturday, and there was still an insanely large crowd.

And how about the number of trucks? Are the streets still blockaded in Ottawa?

More so now than last weekend. At night you can hear the horns over large parts of the city. I quite like it; it’s like a symphony for freedom. The actual sound is like old trains in the distance.

If Pierre Poilievre is selected by the caucus to be interim leader of the Conservatives, do you think he’ll bring a vote of confidence against Justin Trudeau’s government?

[Note: After I sent these questions to Vlad, Candice Bergen was selected as the interim leader of the CPC. I don’t know anything about her.]

First of all, he is by far the most competent person in the party. He needs to be picked as the leader, period. People who want to know what he is about should scan his Twitter feed. He is the only elected federal politician to ask real questions about real issues. As a result, he was removed from shadow finance because he was way more popular than O’Toole. Secondly, the Liberals are in government because they are supported by the NDP, who have a Sikh leader who doesn’t really give a damn. It is believed that his concerns are more about Indian politics. But he is very far left-wing. So he would enjoy the perks both ideologically and personally that keeping Trudeau in power brings. A non-confidence vote would have to mean an election followed by a majority Conservative government with Pierre at the helm. This is conceivable, especially if Maxime Bernier throws his support to Pierre.

If so, do you thing Trudeau will survive it?

The question behind the question is: How much integrity is there in the Canadian voting system. A news story broke today that hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots were not counted. So probably yes, he could survive it.

Continue reading →

The Revolution Has Begun

Posted on by

In the following video Paul Weston discusses the Freedom Convoy of Canadian truckers that converged on Ottawa this weekend, and Prime Minister Justin “Baby Doc” Trudeau’s ignominious flight from the capital.

Mr. Weston sees the convoy as the start of a revolution that may spread to other countries where oppressive Corona policies are in place (which means most countries). Success is not guaranteed, so he urges his audience to support the GoFundMe initiative that helps keep the convoy going:

Thierry Baudet: The Netherlands is on a Path Towards Totalitarianism

Posted on by

Thierry Baudet is the founder and leader of FvD (Forum voor Democratie, Forum for Democracy), a populist conservative party in The Netherlands. He has become the most prominent figure in a political niche that was previously occupied solely by Geert Wilders and the PVV. He is also the only major Dutch political leader to oppose the global “pandemic” hoax and the experimental mRNA treatments that accompany it.

The following interview with Thierry Baudet was originally published in German at Politically Incorrect on January 19. Many thanks to Thomas Landen for the translation:

Thierry Baudet: The Netherlands is on a path towards totalitarianism

Many in Germany were deeply shocked, early this month, by pictures of how a police dog mauled a peaceful anti-lockdown protester in Amsterdam as officers brutally beat him up. (Videos: Gids.tv, Ruptly on Twitter)

The leading voice of the protests against the lockdown and anti-Covid measures in the Netherlands is Thierry Baudet, a member of the Dutch Parliament and the leader of Forum voor Democratie (FvD). At the same time that the demonstrator was being mauled, a group of policemen accompanied an Antifa gang marching to the Forum party office in Amsterdam just a few blocks down the road. The police stood complacently by and did not interfere as the Antifa militia vandalized the party building with a burning paint bomb.

What is the matter in the Netherlands? Last week, PI-News went to Amsterdam to interview Mr. Baudet. He is one of the most outspoken politicians against the Covid hoax in Europe and is looking for allies in Germany.

How do you explain the behaviour of the police forces in the Netherlands?

It is part of the strategy of fear that Western authorities are using against those who question the narrative of the authorities about Covid. They are savagely beaten up by the police, while the criminals who vandalize property are left unhindered. Similar intimidation methods were also used against the dissidents in the former Soviet bloc. They are characteristic of all totalitarian regimes.

Has the Netherlands become a totalitarian state then?

Well, it is shocking, but it is on a path towards it. What happened since 2020 has made me painfully aware of this. I became a member of Parliament in 2017. During the previous decades, national sovereignty had gradually eroded, national governments were supplanted by supranational organizations and our society had become ever more globalist. This has facilitated the growth of giant multinational corporations that are more powerful than national governments.

Since the 1970s, Big Business has convened with politicians in organisations such as the World Economic Forum (WEF), working out strategies to increase the power of both Big Business and Big Governance. Big Business aims to swallow up small and medium-sized companies; Big Governance aims to eradicate national identity. Their mutual enemy is the nation state, because national sovereignty and national borders not only safeguard local democracy and self-governance but also protect small and medium sized companies against multinational giants. The common goal of Big Business and Big Governance is the abolition of nation states, mainly by three means: the promotion of mass immigration, the hollowing out of national sovereignty, and the invention of so-called looming catastrophes, such as climate change, which need to be tackled on a supranational level.

Until 2019, I was optimistic because I thought we were going through a Conservative Spring. I thought that voters in the West had had enough of immigration, the undermining of national sovereignty, the climate alarmism. There had been Brexit, the election of Trump, the electoral triumphs of mainstream populist parties such as the Lega Nord, the Sweden Democrats, the AfD, and others. And then, all of a sudden, there was Corona, which became the perfect alibi for Big Business and Big Governance to attempt to turn the whole world into a quasi-totalitarian state modelled on the Chinese neo-Communist template and to trample our fundamental liberties. At this moment, I have become very pessimistic about the future. I fear politicians might not be able to do much to counter the process we are in.

Surely, that is not a message people want to hear from a politician?

Perhaps not, but it is an honest message. Before 2020, we knew that the ruling powers were pushing transnationalism through immigration, climate hysteria, the dismantling of the nation-state. But now, a new element has been added to this. The so-called pandemic has become the perfect alibi for what Klaus Schwab, the chairman of the WEF, calls “the Great Reset.” By 2030, they hope to introduce a Sinofied society over the entire world. They try to sell it to the people as a utopia in which, to quote the WEF, “you will own nothing and you will be happy.” Unfortunately, many people either fall for it or do not understand the implications.

Politicians can do little to counter this via political means. Even if an individual leader were to try to safeguard his nation’s freedoms, he would be blocked by the international system. I have become very cynical, not only about the ruling elites, but also about the electorates in the West. It is not difficult to see what the next steps are going to be: the introduction of QR codes, the abolition of cash money, biometric authentication through which everything we do will be permanently controlled. But most people do not seem to realise this. They have been paralysed by fear of “the virus”, and they fall for the lies of the media. The majority thinks that without lockdowns, without masks, without vaccinations, boosters and QR codes, they will become ill and die.

Continue reading →

If We Can’t Find Any Omicron Deaths, We’ll Make One Up

Posted on by

Late last year governments were slavering for deaths attributed to the Omicron variant of the Wuhan Coronavirus so that they could ramp up the fear porn and justify another round of masks, lockdowns, and forced “vaccinations”.

The much-heralded “first Omicron deaths” in the USA and the UK fell apart upon closer scrutiny. Something similar seems to have happened in Austria, based on the following report.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Report24:

Bereaved angry: All lies — “First Omicron death” did not die of Corona!

About a week ago, the news ripped through the domestic mainstream media: In Lower Austria, the first person had died due to being infected with the SARS-CoV-2 variant “Omicron”. The report on this in Heute was almost happy; the rest of the tabloids cheered along. Now the survivors of the 87-year-old who died in Lower Austria reported to Report24: “Our father did not die of Covid!” We contacted the hospital — and report exclusively on all the background.

by Florian Machl

A lie spread across the country — once again the entire established public media failed to ask and research the background. Report24 reported on inconsistencies early on based on available information:

Austria’s first “Omicron death”: 87 years old, twice vaccinated. When a beloved 87-year-old grandfather dies, it is undoubtedly sad for his family. But life expectancy in Austria is well below this impressive age.

Sometimes you just have to look reality in the eye — there comes a time for everyone to go.

It would be nice if you could then say goodbye with dignity — but this is exactly what the government has been denying you for two years with excessive and absurd Corona measures.

In the case of the deceased, the irreverence was even exceeded — because the relatives had to learn from the mainstream media that their father and grandfather might have been the first Omicron death in Austria.

Angry son: My father didn’t die of Corona!

“Not true!” writes his son, who lives in Germany. “Currently I am clarifying what cause of death is on the death certificate. If the hospital has registered Corona, I will report it.” All newspapers reported on “Austria’s first Omicron deaths” with a dramatic undertone. Some examples:

  • Heute.at: The first Omicron death in Austria was vaccinated twice
  • Vienna.at: Lower Austria first death after infection with Omicron
  • Krone.at: First Omicron fatality in Lower Austria
  • ORF: First Omicron death in Lower Austria

Son reports long, serious illness

In a longer letter, the Lower Austrian’s son describes the situation from his point of view.

We exchanged several emails, also verifying that the details and the claimed identity are correct.

We share the irritation at the way the death of an identifiable fellow citizen is being used for government propaganda, despite all the protestations of “privacy” — and with a largely untrue story at that.

Continue reading →

A “Radicalisation Expert” Reports to the Manchester Arena Inquiry

Posted on by


Salman Abedi, observant Muslim, Manchester Arena bomber

A “radicalisation expert” reports to the Manchester Arena Inquiry

By Michael Copeland

The Manchester Arena Inquiry is examining the circumstances of the bombing there by the Libyan Muslim jihadi Salman Abedi that killed and maimed multiple victims, many of them children. The Inquiry has received reports from Dr. Matthew Wilkinson, billed as a “radicalisation expert”. Their own report states that there is no suggestion that Dr. Wilkinson’s reports are written from other than an entirely objective viewpoint. Is that the case?

“Radicalisation”

The UK Government’s definition of “radicalisation” is the “process by which a person comes to support terrorism and forms of extremism leading to terrorism”.

This term is used by politicians and media to create a category, the “radicalised” Muslim. This person, by inference, is thought of as different from an observant Muslim. He is assumed to have “misunderstood” his peaceful religion, and is therefore in need of being “de-radicalized” (whatever that may mean). This is not simply misleading: it is factually incorrect. The term is a trap. It sets up an artificial distinction which implicitly separates this category from mainstream Islam. It dangerously begets a subconscious assumption that ordinary Islam is calm and serene, when it is nothing of the sort.

A “radicalised” person, in the definition above, is one who espouses violence in his cause. Islam, it needs to be emphasised, mandates violence towards non-Muslims: “Kill them wherever you find them” (Koran 2:191, 9:5) is part of Islamic law. The distinction of “radicalised Muslim” from “Muslim” is bogus. Violence against kafirs is orthodox Islam, as taught in the mosques.

“Violence is the heart of Islam”
— Ayatollah Yazdi

“Islam was never for a day the religion of peace. Islam is the religion of war”
— Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Caliph of Islamic State, PhD in Islamic Studies

“Does Islam, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit? Yes!”
— Osama bin Laden

Any observant Muslim knows that violence is commanded, and that he may be called upon to perform it. No Muslim may refute this. To do so entails denying a verse of the Koran, which immediately makes him a non-Muslim, subject to the penalty for leaving Islam — being killed vigilante-style by anyone. Such killing is free of punishment, “since it is killing someone who deserves to die” (Manual of Islamic Law, Reliance of the Traveller, o.8.4). So-called “radicalised” behaviour is, in fact, dutiful compliance with basic Islam.

“Radicalisation” is a fantasy fed to Western politicians and the Deep State. It is, however, a lucrative one, providing the subject matter for think tanks and taxpayer-funded programmes. For Muslims it usefully obscures and obfuscates what it is to be an observant member of Islam. In consequence it is difficult to dislodge.

Dr. Wilkinson has a distinction of his own. He is a convert to Islam. His reports are written from a Muslim viewpoint, which, it has to be said, is not “entirely objective”. In them he carefully steers the spotlight away from Islam. This is done by the artful use of doubt-casting, deflections, and selected vocabulary.

Continue reading →

BBC Misinformation: Jihadism

Posted on by

This article was originally published at LibertyGB in December of 2014; it was edited in 2021.

BBC Misinformation: Jihadism

By Michael Copeland

The BBC, in a by now familiar tactic of deflection and obfuscation, misinform their readers yet again in an article “What is jihadism?”. Characteristically, no author is shown. The BBC employ a number of Muslims: it is hardly likely that management would ask a non-Muslim to write an explanatory article about Islam. It is a reasonable surmise that the author is Muslim. Here is where we need to remind ourselves that Islam authorises its followers to employ deception in the cause of Islam. That’s right: Islam authorises Muslims to lie. There is no shame or sin in doing so: it is righteous and devout Muslim behaviour. “Using deception to mask intended goals” is a stated aim of the Muslim Brotherhood plan, as revealed in a captured secret internal memorandum.

“Permissible Lying” is section r8 of the Manual of Islamic Law, Reliance of the Traveller.

The BBC article’s unnamed writer informs us in a rather anodyne manner that “more than 5,000 people around the world died… as a result of violence…” Let us be clear about this: they were intentionally killed — in Islamic jihad killings. The writer avers that those responsible are “al-Qaeda, its offshoots and groups which subscribe to a similar ideology.” So far so good: this is accurate. What follows, though, is obfuscation: the “similar ideology”, explains the article, is “commonly referred to as “jihadism”. This is deception and obfuscation.

“Commonly referred to…” Really? How commonly? Evidently not “exclusively”, or even “usually”: no, just “commonly”. Maybe “commonly” in mosque circles, or maybe — and this is more likely — it is just an unbacked assertion included to sound authoritative and throw you off the scent. The phrase has a crafty function: it is slipped in to pre-empt any objection. You are left to think that because you have not heard of “jihadism” then you are embarrassingly out of touch, because the BBC tells us it is “commonly referred to”. But is it? By whom? When? Where can these common references be found and inspected? In reality what the writer is doing is artfully steering the spotlight away from Islam.

Jihad is indeed part of Islam, an inseparable part. After the compulsory waffle about “internal struggle” the article correctly explains that jihad can be “war for the faith against unbelievers”. This accords with the Manual of Islamic Law, which explains (o9.0) “Jihad means to war against non-Muslims”, and it is “obligatory” (o9.3). Muslims actively engaged in it can be described as jihadis, or jihadists. Jihad is a “communal obligation” (o9.1). Is there an ideology “commonly referred to as ‘jihadism’”? No. Emphatically not. “Jihadism” is not an ideology. The ideology is Islam, that “ideological political movement”, as Anjem Choudary describes it. This is, indeed, what is followed by al-Qaeda and its offshoots — ordinary basic back-to-the-roots Islam. Jihad is a component of Islam. There is no Islam without jihad, and no jihad without Islam. Islam is the source, the only source.

The writer goes on to introduce, gratuitously, many complexities, all of which usefully steer attention away from Islam itself:

“The term “jihadist” has been used by Western academics… as a way to distinguish between violent and non-violent Sunni Islamists.”

Here we go again: these old chestnuts are really rather tedious. What you are supposed to think, you see, is that jihadists are not proper Muslims: they are “Islamists”. Remember “Islamists”? The article explains: “Islamists aim to reorder government and society in accordance with Islamic law, or Sharia.” Just a minute: that aim — making the whole world Islamic — is identical with the aim of Islam itself. “Kill the unbelievers until the Islam is the only governance” is the import of Koran 8:39. Revealingly, there is no mention of “Islamists” in the Manual of Islamic Law, Reliance of the Traveller. No. It is a word deliberately invented for use in the West in order to deflect attention away from Islam. You see, it has to be anything but Islam itself. It is “Islamists”. More than that, it is not even ALL alleged “Islamists”, either. First of all it is only Sunnis, who, albeit a majority, are only a PART of the world’s Muslims, and of them it is only the VIOLENT ones. Nothing to do with Islam: move along, now.

What the reader is intended to conclude from all this is that the remaining Muslims are problem-free, all Nice and Peaceful. Artfully the article does not actually say so: it leaves that conclusion to be formed through this careful conditioning of the unsuspecting mind. It is all designed to take Islam off the hook.

The text includes a masterful piece of obfuscation:

Continue reading →

Normalizing Mass Murder

Posted on by

Our Hungarian correspondent László sends this report on media propaganda designed to prepare its gullible audience for an increase in the number of fatalities for certain medical conditions that just happen to be known side effects of the experimental mRNA treatment that is intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus.

Although this example is specific to Hungary, similar media operations may be expected in other countries. For example, in the UK the increased death rate for these same conditions is being attributed to PPSD — Post-Pandemic Stress Disorder.

Normalizing Mass Murder

Heart Attacks Are Common, Stupid

by László

The Hungarian media have started brainwashing the population about the now known adverse effects of the mRNA jabs, as common causes of death. The article from the globalist outlet Index.hu does not mention the jabs, of course; they just let you know that the most common causes of death in Hungary are stroke, heart attack and even pulmonary embolism — precisely some of the main adverse effects of the jabs. It looks like very well-camouflaged propaganda intended to do jab damage control.

The headline: “Stroke patients transported to hospitals every ten minutes”

So out of the blue, it is now important to inform people about these illnesses, because… because… we worry about your health, yes!

And in the background of all these very common illnesses lurks diabetes as the main underlying risk factor, they say:

The third most common cause of death in Hungary is stroke. And at least one million people suffer from incurable diabetes. If that weren’t enough, new research shows that the two diseases go hand in hand, with one reinforcing the other.

In our country, 200,000-250,000 people live in the shadow of stroke, the number of people who carry the risk factors. Of these, one in five, some 40-50 thousand people, are admitted to stroke centres every year, and 15,000 die from stroke. But you could also say that every ten minutes a stroke patient is admitted to a hospital and every half hour a person dies from stroke in Hungary.

After heart disease and cancer, stroke (cerebral vascular catastrophe) is the second most common cause of death in Hungary.

And that’s just the number we know about. But there are more such deaths than that. But outside the walls of hospitals, without an autopsy, it is not possible to identify the exact cause of death. Vascular problems can cause not only strokes but also heart attacks and pulmonary embolisms, Dr. Ágnes Hasitz, an internal medicine specialist, told Index. […]

Heart attack, stroke, pulmonary embolism: what a coincidence that these are common adverse effects caused by the mRNA treatments as well!

And now it is “not possible to identify the exact cause of death”, so the numbers could be even higher, you see. But in the case of Covid deaths it has been possible to identify the “cause” of death, even without an autopsy — in fact, autopsies have been banned since the Corona psy-op broke out. What else could be the cause of your death when you die in a car accident then, BINGO, Covid ! — because you had a positive PCR test after your death.

Continue reading →

Fact-Checking the Fact Checkers

Posted on by

Boris Reitschuster is a popular German vlogger and journalist. The following article from his website discusses the tendentious efforts by a well-known and supposedly independent fact-checking organization.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for the translation:

Correctiv shoots themselves in the leg during fact check

Truth-guards co-financed by the taxpayer embarrass themselves

These days, if you report critically, you will rapidly have the fact-checker on your back. In recent years the self-appointed truth keepers have sprung up like mushrooms around the world, often with opaque financing models.

The best-known “fact-checkers” in Germany are the “fact fox” of the Bavarian broadcasting company, the “fact finder” of the Tagesschau, the agitation portal Volksverpetzer, and the self-proclaimed research network Correctiv.

Correctiv refutes the quote on the basis of a wrong source

This is about Correctiv. There, on November 17, a fact check was published on an allegedly false quote from DIVI [Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin] President Gernot Marx.

The quote reads: “We are currently registering a strong increase like last year. The big difference, however, is that we have 4,000 fewer intensive care beds available today than in 2020.” (Gernot Marx, President DIVI)

The content of the quote is therefore the significant reduction in beds in hospitals. Correctiv writes: “However, essential context is left out and the myth is fueled that intensive care beds were dismantled in Germany during the pandemic.”

So the dismantling of beds is just a myth? Regardless of the quote in question, this fact can be understood by everyone on the DIVI website.

A rather clumsy attempt to twist the facts.

Regarding the quote, Correctiv claims: “Context is missing: Gernot Marx’s complete statement does not indicate that beds have been dismantled.”

Corrective claims to have researched the quote. The alleged source mentioned is from an interview by the MDR on October 26, 2021, which was quoted in the Ärzteblatt on October 26, 2021.

Professor Marx, how do you assess the current situation in the intensive care units with regard to covid-19 patients?

Gernot Marx: Here at the Aachen University Clinic, the situation is still balanced, but the strain is increasing significantly across Germany. On Wednesday we had 2,136 intensive care patients with Covid-19; 52% of these had to be ventilated. Currently, 60-80 new patients are added nationwide every day In September the situation was stable for a long time with 1,400 Covid-19 patients; now we are registering a strong increase, as in the previous year. The big difference, however, is that we now have 4,000 fewer intensive care beds than in the previous year.

Source: Aachener Zeitung, 4. November 2021

However, the quote is correct and complete, as it was reproduced above, printed in the Aachener Zeitung of November 4, 2021. We would like to take this opportunity to thank the attentive reader who pointed out the incident.

Sloppy research?

The impression that Correctiv gives that the quote is “taken out of context” or misleading is absurd.

The “research network” obviously has difficulties exercising its own core competence — the correct research. What could be more natural than to contact the person involved directly to have the authenticity confirmed? With Correctiv you try to research online instead, but don’t do it thoroughly and end up with the wrong source.

Errors in research happen, no question about it. Especially if there is no editorial team behind the author to check everything again meticulously.

Continue reading →

Hungarian Media Outlet Normalizes Violence Against ‘Anti-Vaxxers’

Posted on by

Our Hungarian correspondent László sends this report on the latest manifestation of Vax Madness in Hungary.

Hungarian media outlet normalizes violence against ‘anti-vaxxers’

by László

Pesti Srácok, a mainstream Hungarian media outlet and a mouthpiece of the government, published an article about the recent Austrian and Dutch protests with this denigrating and deceptive title:

“All hell breaks loose in Austria and the Netherlands as a crazy minority protests against epidemic measures”. [emphasis added]

First of all, this headline is a flat-out lie: no hell broke loose in Austria; the violent clashes happened in the Netherlands to the best of my knowledge. Secondly, they are not protesting against “epidemic measures”; they are protesting against the unlawful curtailing of freedom.

Thirdly, branding people who oppose the totalitarian Corona measures ‘crazy’ is a slippery slope to full-fledged Fascism. Their claim that these protesters are a ‘minority’ is also unfounded; and even though it may be true, calling them ‘minority’ is clearly an effort to minimize the resistance.

What is even more concerning is that the paper does not delete comments that hail the idea of brutal execution, denigration, punishment, grave discrimination and segregation of “anti-vaxxers” who, commenters say, do not even deserve to be treated in the public healthcare system for free anymore. However, the outlet, one of my favourite in the times before the Corona psy-op, has been busy deleting comments that warn people of the real dangers of the Covid “vaccines” or the totalitarian NWO.

So the site is apparently whipping up violent sentiments against the ‘anti-vaxxers’, first by branding them ‘crazy’ and then by not deleting comments that promote mass murder. One such comment:

User name: Tények
Posted: 2021-11-20 at 20:33

every country has crazy people like our “slop coalition”.

I’d execute them all in one night, cut off their legs, their hands, and eventually their filthy heads. Bag them up and burn them with the dead cattle. We would have a pure country after that.

Again, this genocidal comment, which is still up on the site three days after it was posted, publicly expresses the desire to torture, dehumanize and kill protesters (whom he mistakenly believes to be leftists) in Hungary as well — thereby ‘cleaning’ the country. (The “slop coalition” is the nickname for the leftists-globalist opposition in Hungary.)

This public statement is an actual crime, or at least borders on a crime — yet it has not been deleted. Whether such comments are real or are written by paid droids is anyone’s guess.

This commenter has obviously swallowed the relentless government propaganda sideways: this sort of localized globalist brainwashing claims that the ones who oppose the Covid jabs are leftists/globalists in Hungary, hence they are dangerous. Which is a smart trick, because leftism and globalism indeed pose serious dangers to nation states; thus this caution has deeply been ingrained in the minds of many Hungarians.

Therefore the official Corona-propaganda is now deceptively binding the real Marxist danger together with the unreal danger of ‘anti-vaxxers’ — which is of course a total inversion of the reality and utter nonsense. But if a patriot is superficial enough, they may believe that they can protect the country from the commie assault by persecuting ‘anti-vaxxers’. It is a kind of judo-propaganda.

But that is not all: the article at Pesti Srácok normalizes the usage of live ammo against ‘anti-vaxx’ protesters, quoting the police spokeswoman in Rotterdam:

“We fired warning shots, and there were also aimed shots because the situation was life-threatening.”

With its title that brands the protesters ‘crazy’, the article implies that it is the protesters who are the cause of the problem, and therefore shooting at them is justified. It does not bother Pesti Srácok too much what exactly happened in Rotterdam: in actuality, partly Muslim and African immigrants were rioting there, as far as I know, but the otherwise anti-Islam news outlet that opposes third world invasion fails to mention it, so that it can shift the blame to the ‘anti-vaxxers’.

[However I have no intel on who exactly was shot and why in Rotterdam — if you know the details, please let me know in the comments. I also do not know whether true blond Dutch aboriginals with Dutch names set cars on fire or violently rioted in Rotterdam, but I cannot exclude it. Exactly this weakness of the readers is what the article exploits: there have been so many protests recently that it is difficult to follow everything, so they can imply whatever they want.]

However, covertly blaming the Dutch ‘anti-vaxxers’ for being shot with live ammo is still not enough: the article further spins reality by falsly accusing the Austrians as well, even though there were no riots whatsoever in Austria:

“But will an epidemic measure cause the people to revolt and all hell breaks loose?” — asks the paper hypocritically right in the lead of the article, and then mixes in the big lie about Austria: ”In the Netherlands and neighbouring Austria, riots have broken out in the streets and shootings have been reported in the press.”

Even though this is the very first such dark Hungarian article I have read, it is an ominous sign of the normalization of violence against ‘anti-vaxxers’ and dissenters in general.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

The full translated article from Pesti Srácok:

Continue reading →

The New ‘Good’ and the New Evil

Posted on by

We are approaching Endgame after more than a hundred years of the Culture Wars. In the essay below MC picks his way through the grotesque highlights of what is currently underway.

Most modern medicine assumes that God does not exist, and that mankind (‘experts’) must therefore control medical ethics in order to ensure that doctors and others with an interest in medicine do not sacrifice their ethical integrity in order to either maximize their wealth from an exceedingly profitable industry, nor pursue greater knowledge at the expense of the health of their patients.

In 1947, following cruel and murderous experimentation by seemingly normal doctors on inmates of concentration camps in Nazi Germany, international law was laid down concerning human experimentation, coercion and informed consent.

These laws are now being violated on a daily basis by politicians, doctors, nurses and health administrators who advocate and enforce the COVID-19 vaccine. This is not new; it is an old, old story. We are back to bleeding, scoring and purging, leeches and mercury; the medicine of barbers and barbarity.

The Covid vaccine is experimental, and under the Nuremburg and Helsinki LAWS, it cannot be mandated. YOU cannot be forced to violate your bodily integrity — even if granny is in danger.

But granny is not in danger, at least in any statistical sense any more than she usually is, and if she were to take the correct prophylactic treatment to raise her zinc and vitamin D levels then her chances of surviving a CV19 attack are much improved. Unfortunately, it seems, the Powers That Be in medicine and politics want her dead, so they are withholding the real science and the real medicine from her. Granny dead from Covid is a bounty that can be collected…

The ‘science’ as dictated by the government/Big Pharma alliance is to leave CV19 granny alone until her lips turn blue, then put her on a killer ventilator until she dies. For this, a hospital gets a substantial government grant. She is a useless eater — Aktion T4 for her. Do we inject her with phenol, gas her, or put a plastic bag over her head? No, we withhold crucial and effective treatment and inject her with an experimental gene therapy — and this is ethically acceptable?

We are so, so ignorant, we don’t realize that although all the names have changed, the methods have not.

On the whole, the billionaires who are financing this modern Holodomor are stupid frightened individuals who believe in a humanist-based cult whereby:

  • There are too many people on the planet.
  • The planet is being poisoned by too much ‘carbon’
  • That the ultra-rich are entitled to rule over all other groups and use all available resources.
  • That Islam, by its ultra-controlling influence, can be used to divide and rule dangerous ‘Christian’ populations.
  • That fossil fuels can be replaced by ‘batteries’ (where does the electricity come from to charge the batteries?).
  • That solar and wind power can provide enough energy for the remnant population to survive.
  • That putting God at the centre of the Constitution in 1776-1784 had no effect on the subsequent rise of the American Dream; it was purely a coincidence.
  • And that removing God from society is therefore no problem and will not turn the dream into a nightmare.

It is difficult for us to understand the role of God in society, for without God, societies are basically two-tier master/slave societies where the masters work hard to keep the peons in abject slavery.

In the historical British feudal system, the serfs were largely village idiots, kept in a state of abject poverty and malnutrition. The role of the then-Church was to perpetuate the system by removing any intelligent children at an early age into the cloisters for special indoctrination. Wise lords of the manor also took bright children into their service, thus removing leaders from the peasant body.

Britain at the time did not have a skin colour problem; everybody was white. Even in my childhood 1950s England was overwhelmingly white, I had seen non-white people because I had travelled to Singapore as a very young ‘britbrat’ (child of armed forces personnel), but to others in my class at school, they were an abstract from the pages of National Geographic and Hollywood.

Continue reading →

BBC Misinformation: Islamic State

Posted on by

The following essay by Michael Copeland was originally published in September 2014 at LibertyGB (as “BBC Draws A Veil Over Islamic State”), then edited in 2021.

BBC Misinformation: Islamic State

by Michael Copeland

“What does Islamic State want? They want to enforce their view of conservative Islamic traditions.” — BBC

This appallingly inadequate statement is on the BBC’s 6o-second video. It is, in fact, the only statement in it that actually answers their own question.

No, BBC, Islamic State apply Islamic law, Sharia, by force. They not only “want to” but are already doing so. To refer to Sharia as “their view of conservative Islamic traditions” is shameful, dishonest, and inadequate. No author is shown.

The BBC is being careful to draw the spotlight away from Islam itself. To throw the reader off the scent they are nourishing the propaganda line that Islamic State is not Islamic, that they are pursuing “their idea” which, we are left to suppose, is somehow mistaken. Notice that the text skillfully does not actually say so, but leaves that conclusion to be formed by the reader. There is no mention of law or religion: oh no, only of “conservative traditions”. This is an old chestnut, and a tired and worn one at that. Remember the British detective helpfully assuring the public that a murder (a Muslim honour-killing) was nothing to do with Islam (which it is), but was a product of conservative cultural practices of rural Pakistan? How touching that an English policeman be so expert on tribal practices of rural South Asia! So sensitive!

No: Islamic State is applying Islam. The leader has a Ph.D. in Islamic Studies, unlike Mr. Cameron, so is well-informed. He has proclaimed himself Caliph, in the same way as earlier Caliphs did. As Abu Imran (Fouad Belkacem) of Sharia4Belgium has helpfully explained, “Islam is Sharia, and Sharia is Islam.” The Caliph is enforcing Sharia, “the path of Allah.”

Sharia is as defined in the Manual of Islamic Law, drawn from the Koran and the “reliable” traditions, “Hadith”, concerning the life and sayings of Mohammed. Together these all form Islamic Law. The Koran can be consulted online and the Manual, “Reliance of the Traveller”, is available as a download.

A second piece by the BBC, “What is Islamic State?” (again, no author shown), is rather more helpful.

Author’s note: since the LibertyGB article appeared the BBC has silently changed the text of this second article. What follows relates to the original text, no longer shown.

Once again, though, it quickly steers the reader away from Islam by dictating, with no explanation, that Islamic State is “a radical Islamist group”. We can note that Islamic State does not call itself “Radical Islamist State”: no, the BBC does that for them.

“The group aims to establish a “caliphate”“. No, it has already declared one. Now for another chestnut: “the group implements a strict interpretation of Sharia”. No: there is not a non-strict or benign interpretation of “Kill”. “Kill” means kill. What the BBC means is a strict application of Sharia, “forcing women to wear veils, non-Muslims to pay a special tax or convert, and imposing punishments that include floggings and executions.” The law is there: it is just that not all Muslim societies apply it to the letter. Yet another old chestnut is rolled out: “IS members are jihadists who adhere to an extreme interpretation of Sunni Islam”. What, BBC, is the non-extreme “interpretation” of “Kill”? That is right. There is not one. This is just a device to draw attention away from Islam.

Continue reading →

Taqiyya at the Beeb

Posted on by

The two articles below about the BBC were published successively in 2013 by Michael Copeland.

BBC Fog-Making: Soldier Murder in Afghanistan

by Michael Copeland

This article was originally published at Liberty GB, 4 April 2013.

Colonel Lapan, spokesman for the US Joint Chiefs of Staff commented, “we don’t know what’s causing them [insider killings], and we’re looking at everything.” (FrontPage Mag)

In Afghanistan earlier this year (2013) there was yet another dreadful soldier murder and multiple wounding by an Afghan trainee. The BBC, in a shameful piece, “What lies behind Afghanistan’s insider attacks?”, blames a “rogue soldier”. Yet a soldier obeying instructions in his manual is no “rogue”.

Read the Koran, BBC, instead of having an unnamed author refer to unidentified “many analysts” and tipping a barrow load of red herrings such as this:

“But perhaps worryingly for Nato the motivation for many of the assaults cannot be pinned down so precisely. Many analysts believe they are rooted in underlying, even subconscious, resentments that are prone to flare up and with deadly consequences.”

This is fog-making, reprehensible and damaging. Completely contrary to what the author claims, the motivations can be pinned down precisely: they are in the manual revered by every dutiful Soldier of Allah, namely the Koran, the book of fighting the unbeliever. Everywhere that is not Dar al Islam, ‘The House of Islam’, is Dar al Harb, ‘The House of War’ (What the West Needs to Know). Non-Muslims are “the worst of creatures” (Koran 98:6), “the vilest of beasts” (8:22, 8:55). “Allah is the enemy of the unbelievers” (2:98), so therefore must all Muslims be also: “The disbelievers are ever to you a clear enemy” (4:101). NATO, treated as an ‘occupier’, is doubly an enemy.

When a Soldier of Allah murders an infidel ‘occupier’ he is obeying the instructions in his war manual. Some 64% of the Koran concerns non-Muslims, the kafirs, and how to fight them. Islam is political: it concerns land, and involves fighting. It aims for “Mastership of the World”, as the Muslim Brotherhood leader Muhammad Badi proclaimed in 2011.

“The mosques are our barracks,” recited Recep Tayyip Erdogan, before he was Prime Minister of Turkey, “the domes our helmets, the minarets our spears, and the faithful our soldiers.” It was to the BBC that Anjem Choudary explained: “Nothing else is mentioned more than the topic of fighting in the Koran.”

Don’t the BBC listen? Can’t they read? Do they think they know better? Or are they negligently and recklessly allowing the anonymous author to supply them with fog? Thus do they directly imperil our soldiers’ lives. Shame on you, BBC. Will you name your author? Who are the “many analysts”? Cite them. Show us where we can read their analyses.

The Koran cannot be brushed aside: it forms part of Islamic Law. To deny any verse in it calls for the death penalty (Manual of Islamic Law o8.7 (7)). Its content is billed as “true from eternity to eternity” (Sam Solomon, former professor of Shariah Law). Here are just a few of the many, many fighting instructions:

  • Kill the polytheists wherever you find them. 9:5
  • Fight those who do not believe in Allah. 9:29
  • Slay them wherever you find them. 4:89
  • Fight the idolaters utterly. 9:36
  • And that Allah may … exterminate the infidel. 3:141

Remember that when a soldier of Allah has killed infidels it was not he that did the killing: “You killed them not, but Allah killed them.” (8:17) There are instructions about relationships with non-Muslims, the kuffar (a word cognate with ‘dirt’), who are “unclean” (9:28), “the most despicable” (98:6):

  • Do not take the Jews and Christians as allies. 5:51
  • Muslims are merciful to one another, but ruthless to the unbeliever. 48:29

Osama bin Laden wrote: “Battle, animosity and hatred — directed from the Muslim to the infidel — is the foundation of our religion.”

The doctrine of “Permissible Lying” (Manual, r8.2) authorises the Muslim to maintain piously a false appearance of friendship. The revered collector of traditions, Sahih Al-Bukhari, recorded that Mohammed’s companion Abu Ad-Darda’ said, “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.” Mohammed himself said, “War is deceit” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 52, 269). So, too, with agreements: Mohammed is quoted in the Hadith, the traditions, saying, “If I take an oath and later find something else better, I do what is better and break my oath” (see Sahih Bukhari 7.67.427). Agreements with infidels are not binding. An Afghan who appears friendly but who turns his gun on NATO personnel is no “rogue”: he is doing EXACTLY what it says in his book. This is why there should not be any joint patrols, or armed Afghans within NATO bases.

Killing infidels in a situation where the killer himself may well be killed may seem puzzling to a Western mind, but this is a main component of the motivation:

“Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain” (Koran 9:111).

This is the justification for the ‘martyrdom’ (suicide) bombing. The ordinary Muslim can never be sure whether his good deeds will sufficiently outweigh his bad deeds so that he will not be consigned to Hell in the afterlife. In contrast, those who “slay and are slain” are guaranteed immediate entry to Paradise with seventy-two beautiful dark-eyed girls each, perpetually virginal, and boys like pearls, where there will be wine and sumptuous fruits. In Islam’s teachings the martyr achieves his wedding in heaven. The Muslim loves death as the Westerners love life, Osama bin Laden explained.

These matters of Islamic doctrine are what are taught in the mosques. They are not surprise news to Muslims. They can be found without difficulty on the internet. These are what the BBC’s anonymous author refers to as “the complex web of factors that lead Afghan soldiers to turn their guns on their allies.”

Evidently they are not too complex for an Afghan tribesman. Shame on you, BBC.

BBC Deception

by Michael Copeland

This article was originally published at Liberty GB, 28 October, 2013

Continue reading →