Our Italian correspondent Giusy sends the photo below and the accompanying explanation:
I thought you might be interested in this photo of a temporary school classroom in a small town in Tuscany. A friend passing through sent it to me along with this description:
‘Here is a glimpse, conscious or unconscious, of Italy’s future. Four Italian girls gaze out at the viewer. A Chinese girl has joined them. Separate from them are a black African girl and a girl in a hijab. The black girl is twice the size of the Italian girls and looks at them with an enigmatic expression while the Muslim girl looks resolutely away. Meanwhile the only male is half size and his haircut says “No need to take me seriously”.’
(Click to enlarge)
In this instance the phrase “Uniti per una scuola nuova” can best be translated as “Together for a new school” because it was part of a campaign to get a new school. Those who were “together” referred to children of all ages, skin colours and places of origin.
Alaa (right): her brother stabbed the pregnant girl in the chest and slit open both sides of her mouth.
The following report by Egri Nök was published last night at Vlad Tepes in a slightly different form.
“I Delight in Watching Her Die”
by Egri Nök
A 17-year-old Libyan refugee girl in Germany named Alaa was stabbed down and critically injured by her “husband” and her brothers, who filmed the deed.
The brother who did the stabbing is currently standing trial for preparing an Islamic act of terror, and had just been released from custody on February 26.
Alaa’s family then sent the video to her alleged lover. In this version below, that was published by Bild newspaper, the scenes that actually show the critically wounded girl have been blackened out. She can only be heard begging for an ambulance, as she is pregnant — again. She had her first child when she was 16.
A 17-year-old is stabbed down by her husband and her brother in an Islamic rite. Was it an attempted honor killing? It appears the family sent a disturbing mobile video to the victim’s boyfriend after the crime.
This act of violence is blood-curdling: Tuesday evening, a young woman is brutally stabbed down by her husband and her brother. She is critically injured. The two flee. Shortly thereafter, they are arrested on a train in Schweinfurt, 250 kilometers away.
Investigators assume a “relationship incident”, but for tactical reasons they initially did not disclose more. The 17-year-old girl from Libya is married to a 34-year-old Syrian by Islamic law, but not by German law. Both of them came to Germany as refugees.
Disturbing new details have now been disclosed. On Friday afternoon, police announced that it appears that before the deed the 17-year-old wanted to separate from her husband. Was it an attempted honor killing? The cultural and religious background is an important part of the investigations.
According to Bild newspaper, the young woman fell in love with an asylum seeker from neighboring Biberach. On the evening of the crime, the family was assembled in the parental home in Laupheim. After an argument escalated, the 20-year-old brother drove a knife into his sister’s chest and critically injured her.
Alleged phone video to the lover
In its Saturday edition the paper printed stills from a mobile video. In it, threatening male voices, and a whimpering woman can be heard.
A man who shot himself in the head today in front of the White House fence later died of his injuries in the hospital. The man reportedly shot his phone before shooting himself. President and Mrs. Trump were in Florida at the time of the shooting.
In other news, China has announced a national plan to clean up the Internet.
To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.
Thanks to C. Cantoni, Charles Low, Dean, Insubria, JD, Reader from Chicago, SS, Vlad Tepes, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.
Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.
Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.
The book Holy Wrath: Among Criminal Muslims was written by the Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels. This is an English translation of a book called Blandt kriminelle muslimer, which was written in 2008. It is based on personal experiences Sennels had with young Muslim criminals while working as a psychologist for three years at a juvenile facility in Copenhagen.
Since 2008, problems with criminal gangs from an immigrant background have grown worse in Western Europe. The terror threat from militant Muslims and Jihadist groups has increased as well.
On 14-15 February 2015, two victims plus the perpetrator were killed and several others wounded during terror attacks in Copenhagen. The first attack targeted a debate about blasphemy attended by the Swedish artist Lars Vilks, who has drawn Muhammad as a dog. The second attack targeted Jews in a synagogue.
The terrorist was Omar El-Hussein. He was born in Copenhagen to Palestinian parents who fled to Denmark via a refugee camp in Jordan. He had recently been released from prison for a stabbing offense. Omar became radicalized as a militant Muslim in prison. During his deadly attacks, he was carrying a copy of the Koran with a bookmark at Surah 21. This chapter contains verses about punishing disbelievers of Islam.[1]
In cities across Europe, natives are being harassed, robbed, raped, stabbed and even killed by Muslim immigrants. This violence is usually labelled as “crime,” but it could sometimes also be labelled as Jihad. The line that separates crime from Jihad is blurred at best. Sometimes, there is no dividing line between the two at all.
Those familiar with early Islamic history know that looting and stealing the property of non-Muslims has been part and parcel of Islam from the very beginning. In fact, so much of the behavior of Muhammad and the early Muslims could be deemed criminal that it is difficult to know exactly where crime ends and Jihad begins.
Muslims are over-represented in jails all over the Western world. Some violent criminals also convert to Islam while behind bars. As a devout Muslim, you can continue doing criminal things, yet at the same time claim to be morally superior to your victims. If you rob and mug non-Muslims you are not a thief or a thug. You are in fact a brave Jihadist doing Allah’s noble work in spreading the supremacy of Muslims over others.
Some militant Muslims continue their Jihad inside Western jails. In Britain, a prison chaplain revealed in February 2018 that inmates are being forced to convert to Islam for protection behind bars. Paul Song said he had been hit by Muslim inmates at HMP Brixton. He believes that the “Christian faith is not equal” in prison: “Some people have been forced to convert with violence. How do I know? Because three or four people come up to me to tell me. This is a very sensitive issue.” One prisoner has come forward and made a signed statement that prisoners in the UK were forced to convert to Islam after serving time in 2015. Mr. Song says he was removed from his job in south London amid accusations that his Christian teachings were “too radical.”[2]
It is not known exactly how many Muslims there are in French prisons because the French state does not publish such statistics. However, virtually everyone seems to agree that Muslims make up a majority of convicted criminals in France, even though they constitute a minority of the overall population.
Already in 2008, 60 to 70 percent of all inmates in France’s prison system were Muslims.[3] In 2015, it was estimated that of the people behind bars in France, at least 70 per cent were Muslims. The percentage could be even higher than this in cities such as Marseilles, or in some of the most notorious suburbs of Paris.[4]
French prison guards launched public protests against the government in January 2018. French prisons have developed a reputation for being hotbeds of radical Islam that have turned out some of the Jihadists behind a series of bloody terrorist attacks in recent years. The protests began after a convicted Al-Qaeda militant attacked guards in a high-security facility on January 11 with a razor blade and scissors, injuring three of them. A series of other assaults occurred shortly afterwards, often by radicalized Muslim inmates. “These people go to work every day, civil servants, fearing for their security or their lives. We need solutions which respond to this concern for working in safety,” Laurent Berger, head of the national CFDT union, said.[5]
In Copenhagen, it was a shock for Nicolai Sennels when he realized that most of the inmates in a Danish prison were young Muslim men. This is a common pattern today from Scandinavia to Spain. Moreover, the Muslims routinely blamed their victims for their problems. They have been raised within a culture where respect equals instilling fear in others. This is how aggressive emotions are perceived in Muslim culture: It is other people’s fault if you feel emotionally distraught. If what happens is always someone else’s fault, then you are without responsibility for your own situation. You are a victim who has been belittled, oppressed or persecuted. This perceived victimhood leads to a sense of entitlement to retribution and revenge.
A couple of days ago Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that his country had developed a hypersonic cruise missile that would render any anti-missile systems — including those of the United States — ineffective. The video below shows excerpts from the speech in which Mr. Putin made his announcement.
Many thanks to D@rLin|{ for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
Geert Wilders, a Dutch politician and leader of the anti-immigration Party for Freedom, says European nations lack the kind of leadership he sees in the US and Russia, where the interests of their own people are prioritized.
Wilders, who has become a polarizing figure in Europe over his anti-EU and anti-Islam platform, is currently visiting Russia in his capacity as a member of the Dutch Parliament. RT caught up with him for an exclusive interview. Wilder says while he didn’t like a lot of the policies of Russian President Vladimir Putin, but he would like to see a nationalist stance like Putin’s in other European nations.
“Vladimir Putin is a leader, whatever you think of him. I criticize a lot of his policies. But I applaud him as I applaud Mr. Trump for being leaders, who are standing there on behalf of the Russian and the American people,” he said. “We lack that kind of leadership in Europe. Europe, being a non-entity, countries combined — almost 30 in our days and still trying to enlarge — where there is a total lack of sense and identity. Therefore I believe Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin are more favorable than our own leaders.”
In the Italian town of Cassino, a “refugee” from Senegal attacked an employee at an asylum center. The young miscreant was reportedly unhappy that the asylum facility had no Wi-Fi.
In other news, the popularity of French President Emmanuel “Toy Boy” Macron has fallen to a record low of 30%.
To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.
Thanks to Charles Low, Dean, Insubria, KS, Mark H., Reader from Chicago, Salome, Srdja Trifkovic, SS, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.
Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.
Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.
This morning, 02/03/18, Breitbart London led with a report entitled ‘Bury Police Announce Probe Into Grooming Gangs Preying on Children in Parks’.
At the time I had just started an article on a closely related theme, the opening paragraphs of which appeared to be rather appropriate for a comment appended to this report; here is a pasted screen copy of the comment’s negative progress. It remains unchanged five hours later as I submit this article:
DizzyBirdy • an hour ago
I wish people would stop calling them grooming gangs. They are paedophile gangs. Child molester gangs.
The police adopted the term ‘Grooming gangs’ because it sounds less disgusting to people. They use ‘paedophile gangs’ when reporting about white child molesters so they should use it with mudslime child molesters as well.
31 •Reply •Share
I did reply, and this is what happened:
Brother Antony → DizzyBirdy • a few seconds ago
Hold on, this is waiting to be approved by Breitbart News Network.
(In the article, click on ‘Best’ in ‘Sort by Best ↓’ to go to the exact place of insertion.)
…So, there it ended at Breitbart. Here below I offer the offending comment, and I leave it open to GoV readers to decide if or how it breaks any Breitbart (Disqus?) or any other rules, for I cannot:
First, we need to appreciate that there is now a fundamental problem facing these pathogenic Marxist-Socialist-Islamofascists. Because they have been spreading their plague so virulently over the last couple of decades it is running out of corpses, and those of us who have survived its depredations have in the process developed a natural immunity — it is called ‘awareness’.
However, before this infection can be eradicated we need to stand back, understand what its primary vectors are and then, in response, start raising our girls and boys to be real women and men; girls who grow into women who understand that they are the granite foundation stone of the family unit, its nurturative, communicative and associative backbone and its home defense; then boys who grow into men and understand that integrity is manliness, that offence is the best form of defense, that they are not natural born rapists, that racism is a survival trait, that it is good to be a white heterosexual achiever, and both genders need to understand that none of those attributes will be developed in schools polluted with teachers who stack the odds against them by feeding them a diet of puerile, ‘progressive’ emotional pabulum in order to distort their perceptions and handicap their intellectual development.
Rembrandt Clancy has translated (and provided an introduction for) a speech by a member of the AfD (Alternative for Germany) named Maximilian Krah, who describes the destructive policies of Angela Merkel’s government and the likely future of the CDU.
Why is Merkel Opening the Borders Anyway?
The Cause of Merkel’s Policy and the Alternatives
by Rembrandt Clancy
But a madness has quite clearly befallen these people, meaning their actions would otherwise cause healthy intelligence guided by experience to say, ‘Hands off!’
— Maximilian Krah
INTRODUCTION
About the Author
A new personality has emerged in Germany’s Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party. He seeks to find the underlying commonalities and causal structures below the surface play of disparate political policies and cultural disruptions which follow from them. Dr. Maximilian Krah was born in 1977 and lives in Dresden with his wife and family of six children. He is a Corporate Lawyer with a Doctor of Laws (Dresden) and an MBA (Columbia, London). He is a partner with the law firm of Weiler Krah Petersen LLP (LinkedIn).
In his capacity as corporate lawyer, Dr. Krah has represented the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), founded by French Roman Catholic Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in 1971. The SSPX are a worldwide traditional Society of priests who reject the “reforms” of the Second Vatican Council (1962-65). Being largely independent of local bishops, with their 104 schools and six seminaries they are probably the largest single counter-revolutionary force within the post-Conciliar Church (cf. SSPX Districts Overview). Having been raised in the neo-Catholic Church, Dr. Krah’s gravitation toward the Society in 2003 is consistent with the metapolitical importance he places on the re-establishment of Germany’s cultural traditions as an antidote to globalism and the “popular cultural self-hatred” which accompanies it. Further detail on Dr. Krah’s biography and his controversial connection with the SSPX can be found in an interview which The Remnant Online conducted in 2012.
In September of 2016, after a long-standing and active membership in the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), Dr. Krah left Angela Merkel’s party to formally join the anti-mass immigration AfD. In a German language interview with RT, Dr. Krah explains that he left the CDU on account of their policies on immigration, the energy transition (the abrupt nuclear phase-out) and CDU support for the social policies of the Social Democratic Party (SPD).
Dr. Krah holds no elected position with the AfD, but being a formal member of the party he represents them as a spokesman, especially at event-driven press interviews. He also delivers lectures on culture, politics and economics. All three of these fields are included in his talk ‘Why is Merkel Opening the Borders Anyway‘, or alternatively, ‘Why is Merkel the way she is?‘
Dr. Krah delivers his talk in an informal venue reminiscent of the German Stammtisch. It is entirely extemporaneous yet highly structured and easy to follow. It took place in Chemnitz, Saxony, on 11 January 2018. The subtitled video along with the English transcript are found below.
The Structure of the Talk
The Starting point: The Effect of Immigration on Indigenous Germans
The speaker begins with a question which at first directs attention away from Frau Merkel: Why do parents allow Muslim immigrants access to their underage daughters? He mentions Mia Valentin of Kandel who was fatally stabbed by her former boyfriend, Abdul Mobin Dawodzai, on 27 December 2017. He had threatened her and posted nude photos of her on the Internet; and although she had complained to the police (German Wikipedia), the authorities still failed to protect her. This case in particular has subsequently provoked demonstrations made up of the ordinary citizens of Kandel. Dr. Krah then places Mia’s murder in the context of a social engineering film produced on the children’s channel, Kika, which aims at children between three and thirteen. The channel is run jointly by the two German public broadcasting corporations, ARD and ZDF. The production is a romanticised documentary, filmed partly in a misty sepia, in which the 16-year-old Malvina, her young mind intoxicated with emotions beyond her control, narrates her damp-eyed infatuation with a Syrian immigrant, whom Kita had identified as being “about the same age” as Malvina (Die Welt). Originally planned as a series, it was discontinued after the first episode, which is still available on the Kika website for anyone who wishes to absorb the flavour of it. Dr. Krah makes reference to the film’s opening where a reclining Malvina reads aloud a love letter against the background of saccharine romantic music. Diaa pressures Malvina to dress modestly, eat halal and become a Muslim (cf. Breitbart UK). Much later in his talk Dr. Krah mentions the murder of 19-year-old Maria Ladenburger of Freiburg, a volunteer for asylum seekers who was raped and murdered by an Afghan who in 2015 was an “unaccompanied minor”. Maria’s Roman Catholic family was socially well-placed — her father being a high-level EU legal professional in Brussels — and used her obituary to request donations in Maria’s honour to be made to Weitblick (far-sighted) a “refugee” charity which attracts young people into its service and educates them about refugees (Express UK).
Based on these examples, which issue from the broad policy of mass immigration, Dr. Krah asks a question which determines the direction of the remainder of his talk: “What will immunise” these parents against beliefs which support open borders, the “arrival of foreigners who will never work in [Germany]”? There follows a second related question which derives from Frau Merkel’s background in the GDR: “What does a person believe who is formed in such a way?” Behind the answer to both of these questions emerges a very particular model of the state to which Maximilian Krah opposes what he elsewhere calls a “classically personal model of the state” which is rooted in das Volk:
The state proceeds from the citizens, from a people (vom Volk), das Volk is made up of those who are born into it or of a few who are married into it or of those who have assimilated into it or of those who have a feeling of belonging to it. That is something personal; the state is personal. And the elected representatives of this personal entity are responsible for seeing to it that all goes well for this collective and that it keeps going. […] It is in the Constitution and that is what we learned in school. The new mode centres on the entire world. […] Every individual is equal. The state is nothing other than a province in the world… (Maximilian Krah, Straight Talk, 21 November 2017, at 2:16:00 min. ff).
Other Policies
If the speaker broadens the discussion to the energy transition policy, climate change, the euro-rescue policy, the export economy and the subsidisation of southern countries, it is to demonstrate that they all have the very same underlying concept of the state as the open borders policy. This last policy, however, is the most immediately ascertainable, the most emotional and therefore the most galvanising (Straight Talk 1:20:55 min. ff)
The Fellow Traveller as a Vulnerability for the Established Parties
But there is still the question of “what drives these people” to the beliefs behind these policies? The answer is found in the fellow traveller (Mitläufer), a concept which is based on an artifact of the German electoral system which may be unfamiliar to many non-Germans. Dr. Krah specifies two types of fellow traveller, the true believer and the opportunist, although he does give them labels. The former is self-explanatory; an example being Heiko Maas, the Minister of Justice who designed the Internet censorship law (cf. Gates of Vienna). The Interior Minister, Thomas de Maizière, is an example of the opportunist, for which Dr. Krah offers a truly remarkable description of how he functions. But the opportunist is also found among the parliamentary staff (Mitarbeiter). All political parties in the German system hire their own publicly paid parliamentary staff who are also party members, a combination which gives them potential influence on the elected representatives they serve. In September of 2017, the period of the last German federal election, an RT interviewer suggested to Dr. Krah that the AfD, despite their entry into the Bundestag, were still a hopeless parliamentary minority of controversial types who on that account would have no influence whatsoever. Dr. Krah explained in English:
That is a big misunderstanding because what is the CDU and the SPD bringing together? [sic] It is that they have the expectation to get jobs. And as long as Merkel and Schulz cannot guarantee jobs any more for their party members, they come into deep problems and they are forced to change their policy. So if you have 14% of AfD in, and both big parties losing seats, you make a lot of […] a lot of pressure on the party leaders of the large parties to change their politics. So it’s very important that you take them away jobs [take their jobs away] because that’s what they guarantee their members. And that’s the big message from today [the September 2017 federal election], that they don’t guarantee their jobs any more. (cf Maximilian Krah on RT Intl in English, 3:38 min. ff)
Knowledge of these conditions makes Dr. Krah’s argument easier to follow. However, this particular vulnerability of the opposition parties did not work in favour of the AfD in the last federal election, as Dr. Krah himself explains in his talk. The effect was cancelled because the overall number of representatives in the Bundestag has increased substantially since the last election, an electoral artifact too complex to explain here.
Party Politics, Culture and Opposing Concepts of the State
The same conditions apply to politics at the state level. But there may be a temptation to dismiss Dr. Krah’s entertaining discussion of Saxon politics as too local to be of much value, but in Germany regional differences may point to broader political alignments in the future. For example, there has been much speculation about the fact that the AfD is much stronger in the former GDR states than in the former West Germany. The same was true of PEGIDA. One explanation points to regional differences in mentality rooted in recent history which in turn appear to shape a quite unexpected community of interest among peoples in different countries. In the Q and A, for example, Dr. Krah observes that prior to 1989 the East German communist regime spent money on culture. The communist government, he says, was like a “blanket of snow” covering a people who were still passing their culture on to the next generation, a phenomenon which also has its equivalent in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Moreover, the East Germans and the Visegrád countries have not experienced the “popularised cultural self-hatred” that has plagued the West like a “virus” since the 1960s. In the 1980s, Krah says, German instruction in a polytechnic grammar school in Karl-Marx-Stadt was superior to what could be found in a junior secondary school in Duisburg (Lecture with Q&A 50 min. ff).
Thus the same questions which demand a party-political response also require a cultural or metapolitical one; hence Dr. Krah addresses a long-term strategy for restoring the forgotten or latent old-culture of the West. For example, it is of the utmost importance that Germans learn how to sing again, once a required programme for Prussian elementary and middle schools. But singing, singing as a class and learning song texts by heart have all been abolished. Singing is part of, and also symbolic of a larger culture actively carried out and actually practised and shared by a people who, in song, not only “discover they are das Volk, they have discovered we are ein Volk… People must learn again that they belong together…” (Straight Talk 1:30:19 ff). Implicit in Krah’s cultural antidote to globalism is an inverse relationship between culture and madness (Wahnsinn), madness in the sense of delusion (Wahn), which also corresponds to ideology:
But quite obviously a [collective] madness has befallen these people, meaning their actions would otherwise cause healthy intelligence guided by experience to say, “Hands off!”
This passage from Dr. Krah’s talk has been somewhat broadly quoted, but with the word ‘collective’ inserted into it, perhaps inadvertently. The effect is to make explicit that the madness described is of epidemic proportions. The insertion originated with the well-known German blogger Michael Klonovsky, whom Dr. Krah mentions as offering his “solution” to the question of why the parents of Mia, Malvina and Maria have beliefs which bring them to compromise their daughters. The Klonovsky-solution is the focal point of the talk, for it offers a concise description of the content of the madness which many will recognise as part of their immediate metapolitical experience. C.G. Jung used the expression “psychic epidemic” to describe such collective phenomena. Offering National Socialism as an example, he outlines the preconditions for it:
But if there is no relation to a centre which expresses the unconscious through its symbolism, the mass psyche inevitably becomes the hypnotic focus of fascination, drawing everyone under its spell. That is why masses are always breeding-grounds of psychic epidemics, the events in Germany being a classic example of this. (Collected Works. Vol. 9, Part I, Princeton: 1971, par. 227)
Note: A few cuts were made to eliminate some microphone difficulties at the source, with no loss of thematic content.
There’s a nor’-easter coming up the coast right now. We’re not in the crosshairs for the snow and heavy rain — Boston and New York will get those — but we are supposed to get strong winds tonight and tomorrow, with gusts as high as 50-60 mph (60-95 kmh). I can hear the howling starting outside the window even now.
The weather alert is warning about widespread power outages, so if we disappear from view for a while tomorrow, you’ll know why.
Last week’s explosion on a ferryboat in the Mexican town of Playa del Carmen was caused by an explosive device, and not by mechanical problems, as was originally thought. Investigators discovered two similar devices in other ferries. The U.S. embassy has now issued a warning to American citizens in Mexico.
In other news, Tommy Robinson’s Twitter account was suspended after he tweeted about the fact that almost 90% of defendants convicted of “grooming” offenses have turned out to be Muslims.
To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.
Thanks to Charles Low, Dean, Reader from Chicago, Seneca III, Srdja Trifkovic, SS, Vlad Tepes, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.
Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.
Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.
The following short story by Tober Mory was published earlier at the author’s website.
Dedicated to Keeping America a Free Country
Spooked
A Short Story by Tober Mory February 2018
Banaz
“Ouch, that hurt!,” Saif Mahaz yelped as he stubbed his toe, rushing to get out of town to give yet another speech at yet another conference. There was no rest these days for the weary General Secretary of the Council of Caliphitic Collaboration. “Where’s my suitcase?” he bellowed to his second wife. “Right where you left it,” she answered, rolling her eyes.
Saif found his suitcase and plopped it on the bed. When he opened it, a young woman, a shimmering rainbow all around her, popped out and stood on the floor next to him. Face to face with the woman now, he was startled to see she wasn’t wearing a hijab. He couldn’t help but be aroused by the sight of so much exposed female flesh. He was ready to submit to his desires, but she broke the spell.
“You don’t know me,” the woman said. “But I know you and your every thought before you even think it.” She told him her story: Her name was Banaz. She divorced her husband from an arranged marriage and found a boyfriend, Rahmat. After the two were seen kissing, she was raped from behind and tortured by her father, uncle, and cousins. They strangled her to death with a plastic cord, dumped her body in a suitcase, and buried her in the backyard. Dozens of Muslims helped cover up the crime, many offering to lie to the police when family members were arrested.
Rahmat later hanged himself. “There have been lots of stories like mine all over the world since the 7th century, untold numbers of honor killings,” Banaz said. “We — the victims — have a little surprise planned for you and your friends at the Council. In the meantime, you’ll remember me every time you open your suitcase. Good luck getting me out of your head now.”
“What surprise?” Saif asked. “You’ll see,” Banaz answered. “It’s about justice.”
“That’s impossible, you don’t exist,” Saif said as the image wafted back into his suitcase and disappeared. “THERE’S NO SUCH THING AS GHOSTS!” he shouted. “Are you crazy? Pipe down!” his fourth wife, who lived in his house with all the others, called from the kitchen.
“You’re not to yell at me, woman, or I’ll…” “Your ride’s here,” she said, submissively.
Omar
Saif’s flight was uneventful. “It was Allah’s will,” he muttered as he exited the terminal in search of a cab. A driverless taxi pulled to the curb right in front of him and he hopped in the back.
The vehicle was soon in the flow of traffic. Saif looked at a wreck that had been cleared to the side of the road. When he looked ahead again, his heart leapt out of his chest. A rainbow-edged man was in the driver’s seat. His arms were outstretched as if he were reaching toward a steering wheel, but HE HAD NO HANDS.
“My name is Omar,” the man said. “I want you to bear witness. I stole some stuff from a man’s house, but what happened to me next is why I’m here.”
Omar was taken to a park where a sharia court rendered judgment. “For stealing 10 pairs of pants, 10 shirts, a bag and some other items — total value $90 — the punishment is amputation,” the court pronounced. The court had faithfully quoted the punishment as prescribed in the Quran.
Hundreds of Muslims had gathered to watch. Omar’s hand was held up to the crowd, then laid on a table. The blade came down.
CHOP!
Off came the hand, which was lifted up for all to see.
“I was taken to the hospital,” Omar said. “The pain was excruciating.”
Guards from the sharia court kept him from talking to the media.
“So this is the first chance I’ve had to tell my story. Good thing for driverless cars; I can still find gainful employment, ha ha — no thanks to Islam.”
“How about I chop off YOUR hands, Saif, and reattach them — left for right and right for left? While I’m at it, I’ll chop off your feet and put them on you backwards. You won’t be winning trophies at Wimbledon any time soon.”
With that, Omar was gone. Saif looked at the meter to see what his fare was, but all it said was, “Banaz is waiting for you.”
Michael
Arriving at his hotel, Saif got out of the cab and went through the revolving door. As he entered the lobby, a woman ran out of the hotel restaurant and rushed past him, blood pouring down her body.
“In case you’re wondering what that was about, come sit with me and listen to my story,” a man called out, patting an overstuffed chair next to his.
“My name is Michael. I was a doctor on foreign holiday when Elizabeth and I were jihadded. We both left behind children who, thankfully, weren’t with us on this trip.”
This case has been hanging over Marine Le Pen’s head for more than two years, and now it’s finally come to an indictment. The leader of the Front National in France responded to someone who equated her party with the Islamic State by posting images of what ISIS actually does. This was of course unacceptable to the Powers That Be, and the French authorities immediately started making noises about taking legal action against her. Now it looks like Ms. Le Pen will indeed get her day in court.
Many thanks to Ava Lon for translating this French news report, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
The South African parliament voted to amend the country’s constitution to make it possible to confiscate land owned by white people without compensation. One supporter of the amendment is Julius Malema, the leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters. In 2016 Mr. Malema said, “We are not calling for the slaughter of white people — at least for now.”
In other news, three people have been arrested on manslaughter charges for Sunday’s explosion in the English city of Leicester that destroyed a building and killed five people.
To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.
Thanks to Charles Low, Dean, Fjordman, Reader from Chicago, RRN, SS, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.
Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.
Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.
Last week we posted about Ahmad, a Syrian “refugee” who was permitted to bring two wives and numerous children with him to Germany. The whole polygamous family is being housed and maintained under congenial conditions, at the expense of the state.
Below is a longer video about the fecund Ahmad and his culture-enriching brood. Anton, who translated the video for subtitles, includes this introduction:
“ As far as emancipation is concerned, the refugee wave has not brought only progress to Germany.[1].
“Instead, our reporter Andrew Musa found the Syrian family living in a form of mini-harem…. apparently without legal difficulties, although so-called polygamy is prohibited in this country.”[2]
1.
I resent also that SPIEGEL TV suggests there is any progress whatsoever. There isn’t.
2.
Any polygamy is not “so-called” as the TV presenter suggests. It is polygamy. And polygamy is illegal.
3.
They headed straight for Germany past many safe countries. They entered illegally.
4.
Families of this size get around 13K USD tax free every month. Free maternal care. Free child care. Free medical care. Free housing. Free schooling. Free TV. Free telephone. Free everything.
Costing the tax payer around 150K-180K USD NETT!!! For a bunch of illiterate Bedouins.
They can even travel home on welfare to Syria to visit relatives. No problem.
ALL ILLEGALLY.
Note: The average GROSS German wage is around 41K USD per annum.
A man who shot himself in the head today in front of the White House fence later died of his injuries in the hospital. The man reportedly shot his phone before shooting himself. President and Mrs. Trump were in Florida at the time of the shooting.
Since 2008, problems with criminal gangs from an immigrant background have grown worse in Western Europe. The terror threat from militant Muslims and Jihadist groups has increased as well.
