Gates of Vienna News Feed 2/11/2015

The United States, Britain, and France have closed their embassies in Yemen and evacuated diplomatic personnel. All three countries plus Italy have advised their citizens to stay away from Yemen, due to the ongoing political crisis. The situation in the country has been chaotic since the Sunni government was toppled a few months ago and replaced by a Shi’ite regime under the Houthi rebels.

In other news, Fouad Belkacem, a top jihad leader and the head of Sharia4Belgium, has been sentenced to twelve years in prison.

To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.

Thanks to C. Cantoni, Col. Bunny, Fjordman, Insubria, JD, Jerry Gordon, Papa Whiskey, Phyllis Chesler, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

Continue reading

Major Stephen Coughlin on Abrogation

The Center for Security Policy hosted a Defeat Jihad Summit in Washington D.C. today. Among the speakers were Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, former U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, Representatives Steven King and Mike Pompeo, Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders, Danish free speech advocate Lars Hedegaard, and Major (ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

The video below shows Maj. Coughlin’s brief but comprehensive explanation of the Doctrine of Abrogation as practiced in Islamic law. Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for excerpting this clip:

Watch the full six-hour video here.

The more lengthy explanation of abrogation below is adapted from previous briefings by Maj. Coughlin. As always, his material is scrupulously sourced.

The Doctrine of Abrogation

At the very pinnacle of Islamic law is the Koran, which is the uncreated word of God as revealed through his prophet. Every word in the Koran comes from God himself, and is inerrant. Yet the Koran sometimes contradicts itself. These seemingly intractable differences are reconciled through the doctrine of “abrogation”.

So what is abrogation?

This is what Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee has to say about abrogation in Islamic Jurisprudence:[1]

The law was laid down in the period of the Prophet (peace be unto him) gradually and in stages. The aim was to bring a society steeped in immorality to observe the highest standards of morality. This could not be done abruptly. It was done in stages, and doing so necessitated repeal and abrogation of certain laws.

As you can see, Nyazee acknowledges that the Koran contradicts itself. Upon discovering this fact, someone who knows very little about Islam might say, “The Koran contradicts itself. Doesn’t this mean it’s broken?” But it is well understood in Islam that the Koran contradicts itself. This fact is explained, and taken into account. There are methods for dealing with it.

This becomes significant when non-Muslims approach a Muslim cultural expert or “moderate” to ask about certain verses of the Koran that are cited by radicals to justify their violent jihad. The cultural expert or “moderate” will respond with something like this: “You (infidel) must read from the entire body of the Koran to understand the true meaning. Those radicals cherry-pick from the back of the Koran.”

With this reply the cultural expert gives the impression that he does not agree with the radicals, but he never actually says that what they cherry-pick is wrong.

So what is the Koranic basis for the doctrine of abrogation?

It is a Qur’an which We have divided into parts from time to time, in order that thou mightest recite it to men at intervals: We have Revealed it by stages. (Qur’an 17:106)

Concerning this verse, the Qur’an commentator Yusuf Ali says:[2]

The marvel is that these parts, revealed at different times and in different circumstances, should fit together so closely and consistently as they do. All revelation is progressive. The previous revelations were also progressive. Each of them marked a stage in the world’s spiritual history. Man’s mind does not take in more than his spiritual state will have prepared him for. Allah’s revelation comes as a light to illuminate our difficulties and show us the way in actual situations that arise.

Here’s another verse covering the same subject:

When We substitute one revelation for another – and Allah knows best what He reveals in stages — They say, “Thou art but a forger”: But most of them understand not. (Qur’an 16:101)

And once again, a comment by Yusuf Ali:[3]

Continue reading

After 100 Years, a New Islam Law for Austria: Part 3

Reactions to the Proposed Islam Law

This is the third in a four-part series on the new Islam Law. Previously: Part 1, Part 2.

Introduction to Part 3

by Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

At first, the IGGiÖ (Die islamische Glaubensgemeinschaft in Österreich, Islamic Faith Community in Austria) was thrilled about the new draft law. However, after carefully perusing the contents, the representatives came to the conclusion that the law was not as pro-Islam as they had hoped for. As a result, the IGGiÖ and its Shura Council rejected the draft law.

Here’s the report from ORF. I’m grateful to JLH for the translation:

Islam Act — IGGiÖ Rejects the Draft

After consideration by its Shura Council, the Islamic Religious Community in Austria (IGGiÖ) has definitively rejected the government draft for a new Islam Act.

A similar position taken by the Supreme Council — the governing body, so-to-speak, of the IGGiÖ — confirmed the Shura Council, which is more or less the “parliament” of the religious society. To be sure, there is acknowledgment of improvements in comparison to the draft result of the review procedure, but the IGGiÖ maintains its criticism as voiced in the review process.

Primacy of Austrian Law “Natural”

The IGGiÖ states: “The specific statement of the primacy of Austrian law in the text of the law comes against the background that no other religious law is formulated this way, as a kind of suspicion of lack of loyalty among Muslims. And yet, the primacy of Austrian law for Muslims in Austria is a natural thing, which they have confirmed in the constitution of the IGGiÖ.”

To be sure, the governmental template passed by the ministerial council allocates the IGGiÖ its own segment, but this does not obviate the criticism of a “failed concept in the draft.” In the spirit of the Islam Act of 1912, what is required is a law for the IGGiÖ — the Islamic religious community — which includes the four Sunni and three Shi’ite paths of Islam. “Otherwise,” says the announcement, “Muslims cannot identify with this law.” Other religious societies should be dealt with in their own law, just as there is no “Christian Act” for various Christian denominations.

Continue reading

“A Cowardly Cuddling of Islam”

Geert Wilders, the leader of the Party for Freedom (Partij voor de Vrijheid, PVV) in the Netherlands, debated the Dutch prime minister in parliament today (video, in Dutch). Below is the English translation of his speech.

Geert Wilders in Parliamentary Debate with Dutch Prime Minister: “We See a Cowardly Cuddling of Islam”

Madam Speaker,

Exactly four weeks ago today, I stood here on behalf of the PVV group and expressed my anger about the incompetent anti-terrorism policies of the cabinet. I called on the government to wake up. To recognize Islam as the cause of the terror and the misery. To close our borders. To halt Islamization. To let Jihadists leave or a least imprison them. And to never allow them to return to the Netherlands.

Meanwhile, four weeks have passed and no progress has been made. Nothing has improved, the situation only became worse. The Netherlands is facing the biggest threat since World War II and the government policies are still being characterized by amateurism and an incredibly dangerous political correctness.

When last summer Muslims paraded with ISIS flags through the streets of The Hague and screamed “Death to the Jews”, there was no cabinet minister to be seen, and the Mayor of The Hague, a VVD member, refused to return from his holiday in France. And now, when without any violence there is a protest against a mosque in Leiden, Minister Asscher hurries to Leiden and within three minutes the Mayor of Leiden expressed his indignation.

What we see are double standards, a selective indignation, a cowardly cuddling of Islam.

Meanwhile, the government is providing extra support to Islam in the Netherlands. As if nothing has happened. As if the problem in our country is that we have not enough Islam in the Netherlands. In Gouda they are now allowed to build a mega-mosque. With a genuine apartheid wall around it, so that the Muslim men with their beards do not have to confront any female legs. Ludicrous!

This country seems to be governed by lunatics. And the judiciary is equally crazy. You know that my party is of the opinion that jihadis should be allowed to leave. Good riddance. Away from here. Deprive them of their nationality and let them never return.

Continue reading

Islamophobia Turns Deadly in Chapel Hill

Update: Here’s a video of the statement made by the suspect’s wife, followed by statement from the victims’ family (hat tip Vlad).

Three Muslims have been shot to death by a non-Muslim in Chapel Hill near UNC:

3 Muslim Students Shot to Death in Apartment Near UNC Chapel Hill

By Saeed Ahmed, CNN

(CNN) A 46-year-old man has been charged with murder in the shooting death of three Muslim students in an apartment near the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill campus.

Police haven’t said what may have compelled the accused, Craig Stephen Hicks, to allegedly carry out the attack Tuesday evening. He turned himself into police later in the night.

But given the victims’ religion and comments the alleged shooter apparently left on a Facebook page, many social media users wondered what role, if any, the victims’ faith played.

Based on his online footprint, Mr. Hicks is an atheist. I see this incident as an opportunity for the Powers That Be to crack down on the atheist wing of the Counterjihad, which is not as big as the Christian portion, but still considerable.

Anders Behring Breivik was described as a “Christian terrorist” by the media after his massacre on Utøya in 2011, despite his own statements in his “manifesto” declaring himself to be an atheist. Mr. Hicks plainly can’t be used in that fashion — his atheism was too militant and public. He has expressed his disdain for Christians online, posting “a picture from United Atheists of America asking ‘why radical Christians and radical Muslims are so opposed to each others’ influence when they agree about so many ideological issues’.”

Continue reading

Gates of Vienna News Feed 2/10/2015

Two young men were arrested today on terrorism charges in Fairfield, a suburb of Sydney. A knife and a flag were said to be among objects seized from a residence. No Mohammed Coefficient or cultural enrichment index has yet been released by Australian authorities. However, they reassured the public that the incident had nothing to do with Islam. Nothing whatsoever. Honest. Cross our hearts and hope to die.

In other news, Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu told an audience in Zurich that “Islam is Europe’s indigenous religion.”

To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.

Thanks to C. Cantoni, Fjordman, Insubria, JD, K, KU, Steen, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

Continue reading

A Reality Check

The following essay by Nick McAvelly was originally published at Patriot’s Corner in a slightly different form.

A Reality Check
by Nick McAvelly

“It is impossible to engage in intellectual discourse with National Socialism because it is not an intellectually defensible program. It is false to speak of a National Socialist philosophy, for if there were such an entity, one would have to try by means of analysis and discussion either to prove its validity or to combat it. In actuality, however, we face a totally different situation. At its very inception this movement depended on the deception and betrayal of one’s fellow man; even at that time it was inwardly corrupt and could support itself only by constant lies.” (The White Rose, 2nd pamphlet.)

“If it were possible for any nation to fathom another people’s bitter experience through a book, how much easier its future fate would become and how many calamities and mistakes it could avoid. But it is very difficult. There always is this fallacious belief: ‘It would not be the same here; here such things are impossible.’ Alas, all the evil of the twentieth century is possible everywhere on earth.” (Solzhenitsyn, A. The Gulag Archipelago, Harvill Press, p. x)

“For the thing I greatly feared has come upon me,
And what I dreaded has happened to me.
I am not at ease, nor am I quiet;
I have no rest, for trouble comes.”
(Job 3:25-26 NKJV)

A multicultural utopia is a theoretical and practical impossibility that can only be defended using fallacies and lies. Each and every time a terrorist attack is carried out by devout Muslims yelling out the takbir, the assertion that all cultural values are compatible is refuted. Yet some people maintain that Islam is a religion of peace and its doctrines and practices are compatible with our own traditional Judeo-Christian heritage, because after all, not all Muslims are terrorists. That may be true, but it is completely irrelevant.

A categorical proposition is a statement which relates members of one group to members of another. It has a subject term and a predicate term, and it can be expressed in the following standard forms: All S are P, No S are P, Some S are P and Some S are not P.

One attribute of categorical propositions is quantity; this refers to whether the proposition makes a claim about every member of the class denoted by the subject term. The propositions ‘All S are P’ and ‘No S are P’ both say something about all members of the class denoted by the subject term S, so those propositions are said to be universal. The propositions ‘Some S are P’ and ‘Some S are not P’ say something about one or more (but not all) members of the class denoted by the subject term S, so those propositions are said to be particular.

Another attribute of categorical propositions is quality. A categorical proposition claims that some or all the members of the class denoted by the subject term are also members of the class denoted by the predicate term, which is affirmative, or that they are not, which is negative. So the propositions ‘All S are P’ and ‘Some S are P’ are affirmative and the propositions ‘No S are P’ and ‘Some S are not P’ are negative.

The four standard form categorical propositions have traditionally been referred to using the first four vowels of the Roman alphabet. The universal affirmative proposition (All S are P) is called an A proposition, the universal negative (No S are P) is an E proposition, the particular affirmative (Some S are P) is an I proposition and the particular negative (Some S are not P) is an O proposition.

The logical relationship between the four standard form categorical propositions can be shown using the square of opposition:

If someone says that not all Muslims are terrorists, they are asserting that, where the subject term is “Muslims” and the predicate term is “terrorists”, the A proposition (All S are P) is false. What are we to make of this?


The A proposition – All S are P

As we can see from the square of opposition, the A proposition “All Muslims are terrorists” is a contradictory of the O proposition “Some Muslims are not terrorists”. Since they are contradictories, both propositions cannot be true at the same time, and both propositions cannot be false. So if the A proposition “All Muslims are terrorists” is false, then the O proposition “Some Muslims are not terrorists” must be true.

Continue reading

Making Sense of Retrograde Motion

Vlad Tepes has perfected the art of the Hybrid Text-Video Essay. He takes short video excerpts and intersperses them with his own text, using the clips as examples to illustrate what he’s discussing. In a recent hybrid essay, he features four clips featuring (1) Eric Holder, (2) Assistant Secretary of Defense Paul Stockton, (3) President Obama, and (4) Bill Warner.

“That’s an odd mix, Baron,” you say. “How does he make all that fit together?”

Well, you’ll have to watch the videos to see for yourself. But here are some excerpts from his accompanying text:

Adding the missing puzzle piece on Obama’s peculiar lexicon

Often, when consistent observations do not fit any acceptable theory, the public or pundits will feel they have to make up a complicated puzzle piece that allows observations to fit with an accepted paradigm. Authority hates a vacuum and humanity hates an unknown. And often one can tell that this was what took place because the solution is clumsy, counter-intuitive and impossibly complex.

One of my favorite examples of this was the Catholic Church propagation of the notion of ‘retrograde motion’ of the planets to try and explain why, when observing the motions of the planets, they did not always move in perfect circles around the Earth as the legally mandated theory of the day insisted they must, but instead, occasionally moved what appeared to be backwards for a bit as their orbits around the Sun were viewed from the Earth. The Church at one point had a giant clockwork machine made that more or less replicated these motions to show how they happened in fact.

(To the Church’s credit, they allowed observations to be made and attempted to adjust their model to account for these observations and even though conclusion based reasoning is anathema to science, it is still an order of magnitude more valuable than Islam which kills the observer when reality fails to reflect belief.)

Once the theory was changed from an Earth centered universe to a Sun centered solar system within an arm of a spiral galaxy, pretty much all observed motions of planets and stars fit theory near enough to perfect for accurate predictions to be made.

Continue reading

A Typical Week in Dhimmi Britain

Prompted by last Sunday’s culturally-enriched gathering at Downing Street, Paul Weston sends the following observations on the dire situation of Modern Multicultural Britain.

A Typical Week in Dhimmi Britain
by Paul Weston

It is amazing — in a rather horrifying way — to track the antics of the Religion of Peace in what was once Great Britain. News over the last few days serve only to reinforce my belief that British politicians and media journalists have already submitted before Allah, or have large off-shore bank accounts bulging with treacherous blood money as a reward for betraying their country.

If this sounds a bit far-fetched, consider the peculiar behaviour exhibited by our supposedly impartial journalists over the weekend. The EDL held a march in Dudley on Saturday, protesting about the building of yet another mega-mosque which the vast majority of local people are firmly against. Some 1,000 plus patriotic Brits turned out for the event. A peaceful march ensued and a number of speakers outlined why it was not really a good idea to add another propaganda centre for Islam in the town.

Around fifty delightful young chaps from David Cameron’s UAF friends and Antifa also turned out, all dressed in black with balaclavas thoughtfully covering their scowling and hate-contorted faces lest cameras catch their violent behaviour carried out in the name of “anti-racism” — which is something of a misnomer when one considers the virulent racial hatred they feel toward the native British.

Of these fifty upstanding examples of decency and compassion, thirty were arrested (see video) after they attacked the police. Curiously though, all the media headlines were along the lines of “Thirty arrested at EDL demonstration in Dudley”, leading the low-information reader to assume all those arrested were from the EDL. In point of fact, no EDL supporters were arrested at all.

The Birmingham Mail was guilty of blatant propaganda here, but rather foolishly allowed their comment board to remain open. Within a few hours hundreds of people pointed out their story was a tissue of lies and disinformation. Some questioned the ethics of modern day Birmingham Mail journalists and publicly mused as to whether the propaganda they pumped out was in line with the integrity one expects from those who purportedly exist to tell us the unvarnished truth.

Having been caught in-flagrante as it were, the Birmingham Mail took the only course of action available to such an honourable edifice of truth telling… and deleted all the comments whilst making no attempt whatsoever to edit the article in order to reflect truth and objectivity. The editor is a chap called David Brookes who may be contacted at David.Brookes@trinitymirror.com should readers wish to drop him a line…

On Sunday another demonstration occurred, this time held by thousands of Muslims outside Prime Minister David Cameron’s temporary London pied-a-terre in Downing Street. Some people have noticed how hard it is to get large numbers of Muslims onto British streets to state “Not In My Name” regarding paedophile rape gangs, beheaders of British soldiers or blowers-up of London tube trains, and sure enough this large gathering had nothing to say about such errant Muslim behaviour. They were more concerned about abolishing free speech you see, particularly with regard to free speech about lovely, peaceful old Mo by those rascals at Charlie Hebdo magazine.

Continue reading

After 100 Years, a New Islam Law for Austria: Part 2

Critique of the draft law by Wiener Akademikerbund

This is the second in a four-part series on the new Islam Law. Previously: Part 1.

Introduction to Part 2

by Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

In order to understand the process of lawmaking in Austria, here is a short and very simplified overview:

The government presents a draft law, which is then forwarded to Parliament and discussed in committee. There are usually one to two hearings before the law — sometimes after being amended — goes to a plenary session and is then voted into law.

Before the government votes on the draft law, it is usually preceded by more or less lengthy discussions which include those affected by the law. In the case of the new draft law on Islam, the initial discussions, lasting nearly two years, aimed at comprising “Austrians as well as Muslims from all walks of life.” This is blatantly false, however, since the Wiener Akademikerbund (WAB) was excluded from any deliberations.

Nevertheless, as soon as the initial law was presented in draft form, anyone, including the WAB, was permitted to comment officially on the Law, before it was voted on by the government. The WAB seized this opportunity and presented a lengthy paper with a scathing analysis of the failings of this law (Islamgesetz 1912, Änderung in German only, all comments and critique presented to Parliament).

Below is the Commentary on the Draft Law by the Wiener Akademikerbund as translated by Rembrandt Clancy. The original German version is available here. Following the WAB paper is a news article from an Austrian daily that is relevant to the deficiencies of the proposed Islam Law.

Wiener Akademikerbund
A-11080 Wien, Schlösselgasse 11/I www.wienerakademikerbund.at

Commentary on the Draft of a Federal Law Amending the Islam Law of 1912

For some years, the Wiener Akademikerbund has been comprehensively and systematically engaged both with the doctrines of Islam, its constitution [Verfaßtheit], legal foundation and development in Austria, and with the effects of its implementation and its expansion, especially in Europe. The Wiener Akademikerbund considers itself called upon to accept the invitation to participate in the process of assessment and consultation which was issued as the draft was being published on 2 October 2014.

Contents:

1.   Synopsis
2.   Background
3.   Initial situation prior to the implementation of the project for a new Islam Act. The constitution [Verfaßtheit] of real Islam in Austria.
4.   The necessity for a new Islam Act. Support for the legislative project and identification with the “spirit of the law”, as it is expressed in the draft at hand.
5.   Rationale for the indispensability of the measures to be taken in connection with the three central reform points of the draft.
6.   The draft’s central structural error and its far-reaching consequences.
7.   Proposal for the direction to be taken in repairing the cited defect.
8.   Important technical details by which the draft should be improved and/or supplemented.
 

1. Synopsis

The more than 100-year history of Islam legislation in Austria began in 1912 with an act of tolerance unique in the world, and with an “outstretched hand”. Since then, many deficiencies and imperfections have slipped in through dealings with the “real Islam”. Today, there is reason to assume that the Islamic Religious Community in Austria has no valid legal basis. And a proliferation of non-transparent mosque organizations is taking the principle of religious freedom to the point of absurdity.

The project to renew the Islam Act is overdue and most necessary. The Wiener Akademikerbund identifies with the “spirit of the law” which undergirds this project. Longstanding demands of the Wiener Akademikerbund are reflected in the draft text: disclosure of the tenets of the faith, a ban on financing and radical influence from foreign sources, as well as the dissolving of the religious operations of the associations that are exempt from any supervision or responsibility.

The draft, however, has a serious legal defect that is likely to undo all the intentions of the project. The defect is the result of complex causes and is, at first glance, barely recognizable. It will be analyzed in minute detail in the present commentary. A specific suggestion for a remedy will indicate a way out of the dilemma. Additionally, detailed suggestions for improvement and reform will be made, which are suited to increase the likelihood of accomplishing the goals of the planned Islam law.

2. Background

Without knowing the history of the origin and development of the concrete legal issues, it is no more possible to understand the need for a new Islam law than it is to grasp the strengths and weaknesses of the draft that is now before us.

After the final repulse of the Ottoman expansion in the Balkans by the European forces of the Austro-Hungarian Habsburg monarchy, Bosnia and Herzegovina were made protectorates of Austria by the Berlin Congress of 1878. Not until 1909 were they accepted into the Austro-Hungarian monarchy. In 1910, this acceptance was formalized by a special status conferred by Emperor Franz Joseph. The monarchy was affording the land a respectable economic prosperity, and was at pains to preserve the religious peace as well as the social structures frequently linked with the Muslim elites. As a special mark of equality, Islam was therefore to be awarded the status of a legally recognized religious community throughout the entire empire. This took place “with the agreement of both Houses of the Imperial Assembly” in the Islam Act of July 15, 1912.

Continue reading

Gates of Vienna News Feed 2/9/2015

Masked gunmen carrying Kalashnikovs opened fire on police when the police chief entered a culturally enriched housing estate in the French city of Marseille. Elite police units were dispatched to the scene to deal with the disgruntled activists. The incident (which had nothing to do with Islam) came just before a scheduled visit by Prime Minister Manuel Valls.

In other news, according to The Daily Mail, the Islamic State is facing a shortage of volunteers for suicide bombings.

To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.

Thanks to C. Cantoni, Fjordman, Insubria, JD, K, Nick, Papa Whiskey, Srdja Trifkovic, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

Continue reading

Iran: Strangled by a Gordian Knot

Our expatriate English correspondent Peter returns with an essay about Iran just before the turn of the millennium. He includes this introductory note:

This is an item I first wrote in 1998, which covers a two-week visit to Iran taking in Tehran, Esfahan and Shiraz while I was en route from Delhi to Istanbul. I wrote it originally at the request of a friend who works for the BBC’s Farsi service, but the BBC decided not to use it or to pay me for the privilege of not using it. Apparently the views expressed were at variance with the BBC’s Middle Eastern policy, whatever that might have been.

The article is very much as it was when I wrote it, that is, my impression of Iran in 1998, but its relevance today is that when the inevitable violent revolution finally dislodges the governing theocracy, it will be seen that violence was the only possible way for the people to achieve the necessary change.

Iran: Strangled by a Gordian Knot
by Peter

April 1998

It was just after midnight as, in company with my fellow passengers, I finally stumbled into the bustling arrivals hall on Tehran airport, more than three hours after my flight from Delhi via Dubai had landed. The intervening time had been spent standing in a series of queues while a number of dishevelled hirsute men went through our baggage and other belongings minutely examining everything we had, presumably to ensure we were not bringing anything into their country that might in any way be considered improper, offensive, or undesirable. No sooner had we left one queue than we had to join another and yet another after that while different sets of plain-clothes ruffians rummaged through our things. After we had performed this particular ritual a sufficient number of times, the roughnecks who were detaining us must have decided that we didn’t have whatever it was they might have been looking for and allowed us to leave.

Although I was the only non-Iranian on the flight, I had not been treated any differently by the customs officials than had any of the other arrivals, although the same could not be said for passport control where I was removed from the queue by two more unkempt bruisers and escorted to the end of the line, clearly a discriminatory gesture but an understandable one since, unlike most EU countries, Iran was not burdened by a multi-billion-pound race industry.

It was another week before I saw Tehran in daylight. With its characterless, concrete buildings, some adorned with murals depicting the baleful visage of the late Ayatollah Khomeini or the more benign features of the current president Mohammed Khatami, I concluded that it had not been worth the wait. Indeed, Tehran appeared to be so devoid of any prominent landmarks that I had no idea how I would find my way around without getting lost, a misgiving I raised with my friends after the taxi had dropped me at their ground floor apartment.

Ali, his wife Soraya and their two daughters had been staying at the same hotel as me in Esfahan and they had adopted me to ensure I did not fall foul of any xenophobic activities in which some of the local inhabitants were known to indulge, or to prevent me from committing some outrageous though innocent blunder that might have brought me into contact with the Komite, a particularly virulent strain of religious police whose apparent role in Iranian society was to find out how ordinary people managed to enjoy themselves in this austere theocracy and instantly put a stop to it. Thanks to my new-found friends, I found out what most things cost, generally a lot less than they did in Western Europe, and that while the accepted currency was the Rial, worth about 1500 to the US dollar at the time, there was also something called a Toman worth ten Rials. There did not appear to be any denomination of banknotes denoting the Toman and I quickly decided that its only reason for existence was to make certain I paid ten times the going rate for any commodity I might need.

By the time I’d returned to Tehran, after spending four days in Esfahan and three more in Shiraz, I’d formed the opinion that Iran was a country that evoked many questions but offered few answers in return. For example, while I waited in baggage reclaim for my suitcase, I noticed a number of passengers from Kish Island, a duty-free resort in the Persian Gulf, removing articles from a carousel piled high with boxes containing the latest and most advanced Japanese technology and satellite equipment. Yet, in a country where communication with the outside world was actively discouraged by a Government, whose edicts were covertly policed by any number of sinister internal organisations, how could it be that people were openly unloading digital receivers and satellite dishes at a public airport without any apparent fear of detection or reprisal?

As I was being driven through the dusty streets of Tehran, I noticed bed linen hung out to air on every balcony, veranda or patio I passed, a futile gesture in this highly polluted environment but one in which everybody appeared to participate without exception. Ali revealed the answer to this particular conundrum when he showed me his garden and I noticed the edge of a huge satellite dish protruding from beneath the sheet festooning his balcony. He explained that everybody he knew had satellite dishes and as long as these remained concealed, nobody could report them to the authorities but anyone who neglected to hide their dishes could guarantee a visit from the Komite, whose heavy handed representatives had a well-earned reputation for physical abuse and malicious damage, not to mention arbitrary arrest and detention without trial.

This was not the only problem Ali was experiencing because of his family’s access to satellite television. He also felt that his fifteen year-old daughter, Shaida, spent more time watching MTV or the Indian Channel Zee than she did on her schoolwork, and this might ultimately undermine her efforts to secure a place at university when the time came. It was a familiar concern. In the early 1960’s, my parents had the same reservations about my relationship with Radio Luxemburg.

Unlike the rest of her family, Shaida was fluent in English, and during our frequent discussions, revealed an insatiable curiosity about life in England and an encyclopaedic knowledge of English boy bands. It was she who first revealed to me the widespread disillusionment with the Khatami Government that was sweeping the country only a year after he took 70% of the vote during the 1997 Presidential Election. Thousands of teenagers were reputed to have dragged their parents to the polling stations to ensure the selection of this popular reformist candidate. Now his good intentions appeared to be foundering on the self-serving intransigence of the conservative clerics, fuelling seething discontent amongst his erstwhile supporters who blamed him, unfairly, for failing to deliver on his manifesto.

Continue reading

After 100 Years, a New Islam Law for Austria: Part 1

The Original Law, and the Proposed New Law

Words cannot express the gratitude the Wiener Akademikerbund (WAB) extends to Rembrandt Clancy and JLH for their tireless and dedicated work in translating this mass of very difficult legal material. The task was truly an epic challenge for both translators, and we congratulate them on a job well done. Vielen Dank!

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff
Vice Chairman of the Board, WAB

Introduction

The Austrian Law on Islam is unique in all of Europe, perhaps even worldwide: Islam, along with other major religions such as Catholicism, Protestantism, the Jewish faith, Buddhism, and others, is granted a special status within the legal system. Not only that, but the taxpayer also foots the bill for imams, religious education, and other matters. (This also concerns all other legally recognized religions.)

The original law was necessitated by the Austria-Hungary’s annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovina at the beginning of the 20th century: the incorporation of Hanafi Muslim soldiers into the Austrian army demanded that the Hanafi school of Islam be legally recognized. Little did the authors of the law know that nine decades later this very law would be the cause of so much discussion.

The main point of discontent has always been the lack of disclosure of the tenets of the faith by the Islamic Faith Community, as demanded from and adhered to by all other faith communities. Thus, official Austria does not know what faithful Muslims believe in. This has resulted in the ridiculous situation that numerous Islam-critics have been convicted for “denigration of religious beliefs of a legally recognized religion” while the state has no idea what these teaching comprise!

The Austrian think tank Wiener Akademikerbund (WAB) has for many years now been very vocal in calling out the ruling elite about the challenges Austrians face with regard to the ongoing Islamization of Austria. The resulting vilification of WAB has not ceased. However, given that Christian Zeitz is the expert on the Law on Islam as well as Islam itself, it was only natural for him to be chosen as an expert witness in the parliamentary constitutional committee discussing the updated Law on Islam.

It was and continues to be our aim and guiding principle — and that of all people critical of Islam — to prevent the propagation of Islam and Sharia law by the law and within the law, i.e. secular law.

Let us back up now and present the original Law on Islam for readers to peruse.

Imperial Gazette — 1912

(Official translation as provided by Language Services and Terminology, Federal Ministry of Economics and Labour-Vienna)

Part II

1. Austria

Imperial Gazette for the Kingdoms and crown-lands represented in the Imperial Council
Year 1912, item LXVI, published and dispatched on this 9th of August, 1912

159

Law dated 15th July, 1912

referring to the recognition of the adherents of Islam according to the Hanafite rite as religious community

In agreement with both chambers of the Imperial Council I herewith order as follows:

ARTICLE 1

The adherents of Islam shall be granted recognition as religious community in the kingdoms and crown-lands represented in the Imperial Council in the meaning of the Constitutional Law of 21st December, 1867, Imperial Gazette No 142, in particular article 15, under the following terms:

Section 1

The external legal conditions of the adherents of Islam shall be regulated on the basis of an autonomous administration, due consideration being given to state supervision by way of ordinances once the foundation and existence of at least one religious community has been achieved. Particular attention shall be paid in this respect to the relations of the religious organisations of the adherents of Islam living within the country with those in Bosnia and Herzegovina. A religious community having been established, the creation of charity foundations for religious purposes of Islam shall be permitted.

Section 2

In agreement with the Minister for Cultural Affairs also religious functionaries from Bosnia and Herzegovina shall be permitted to be appointed to the office of a religious servant.

Section 3

If a disposition of the organiser of a religious service is, in the opinion of the government, contradictory to public considerations, such service may be prohibited.

Section 4

A religious servant found guilty of a criminal offence or punishable act, committed for pecuniary benefits, in violation of morality, or constituting a public nuisance, or whose contact threatens to endanger public order, shall be removed from office.

Section 5

The state authority shall see to it that the religious community of the adherents of Islam, their communities and organs do not exceed their scope of activities, meet the requirements of the law and of the envisaged ordinances on the external legal conditions of this religious community, and enforce the ordinances promulgated on this basis, apply fines tailored to their financial means and other legally admissible coercive measures.

Section 6

The religious community of the adherents of Islam according to the Hanafite rite shall, both as regards the community as such and religious worship and religious servants, enjoy the same legal protection as is granted to other legally recognised religious communities.

The doctrines of Islam, its institutions and customs shall enjoy the same protection too, unless they are in contradiction to state law.

Section 7

As regards marriage of the adherents of Islam and the keeping of the registers of births, marriages, and deaths, the provisions of the Law dated 9th April, 1870, Imperial Gazette No 51, shall remain in force.
Religious obligations in respect of marriage shall not be affected by these provisions.

Section 8

A respective ordinance shall stipulate if and how religious servants of Islam may be employed to assist with the keeping of the registers of births, marriages, and deaths of their fellow believers.

Article II

My Minister for Cultural Affairs and Education, my Minister of the Interior, and my Minister of Justice shall be entrusted with the implementation of this law.

Bad Ischl, on this 16th of July 1912
Francis Joseph, m.p.

And here is the new draft law, as proposed and submitted to Parliament (translated from the German by Rembrandt Clancy):

Draft

Federal Act, Amending the Law on the Recognition of the Followers of Islam as a Religious Society [Religionsgesellschaft]

The National Council has decided:

The Act on the recognition of the adherents to Islam as religious society, RGBl [Imperial Law Gazette] I Nr. 159/1912, last amended by the Federal Ministries Act Amendment 2014, BGBl. [Federal Law Gazette] I Nr. 11/2014 shall be amended as follows:

Continue reading

“These People Don’t Belong in This Country”

We reported last night on yesterday’s mass demonstration by British Muslims at Downing Street in London. The culture-enrichers in attendance — whose numbers were estimated at 3,000 to 10,000 — were angry about the Charlie Hebdo cartoons, and demanded that the British parliament pass laws criminalizing the insulting of Mohammed.

Some thirty counter-demonstrators from Britain First were present throughout the event. They were outnumbered by at least a hundred to one, so it took a substantial contingent of Metropolitan Police to keep the Muslim demonstrators from inflicting the “harmony” they were so vociferously promoting on the British patriots across the street:

Hat tip: Vlad Tepes.