Islamic Asylum-Seekers in Germany

 
Camp for German asylum-seekersThe Global War on You Know Who has done a fascinating first-hand investigative report on Islamic asylum-seekers in Germany. The intrepid blogger ST ventured into the “camps” the German government provides for Muslim immigrants awaiting decision on their status. It may be called a “camp”, but it looks like a slum:

     But this is a misnomer. Not only will Germans never again build anything one could call a “camp,” the term implies controlled access, which is entirely absent. The Lebach facility is best described as projects. Located in a residential area of a quiet town, it consists of perhaps twenty two-story apartment buildings with courtyards, a school, and sports fields, covering an area of about four square blocks. Nearby are two Bundeswehr (German army) installations. We spotted a police cruiser doing a quick patrol as we arrived, and noticed that local Germans, out for their traditional Sunday afternoon walk, did not stray into the neighborhood.

ST wandered around taking photos and arousing the ire of the residents until the situation became alarming.

The situation described seems tailor-made for importing terrorists into the heart of Europe:

     The German government (actually, the 16 state governments) maintain 31 more such ghettoes throughout the country. One might be tempted to criticize officials for housing people in such crapulence, or the people who live there for creating it. However, the critical issue is egress. Residents are not yet legal immigrants, but random people who showed up at a German airport and asked for asylum. From there, while their applications are processed (and their rent and food provided by taxpayers) they can melt away into the population at any time. And thanks to Europe’s open borders, they can disappear not just in Germany, but to anywhere in the EU. Like Madrid.
Thus, Europe is only as secure as its weakest link. This is not to say that a uniform EU policy would solve the problem, as the Eurocrats would be likely to impose something resembling Germany’s system on all of Europe.
The upshot is, citizens of First World countries must follow immigration rules and face consequences for breaking them, while Middle Eastern terrorists are exempt, provided they recite a politically correct sob story. This is compassion taken to its illogical extreme, and sadly, the generosity extended to criminals and terrorists is exactly what generates public antipathy towards all asylum-seekers, including those who are genuinely persecuted and want only to live peacefully. Lebach is the symbol of an asylum system that wrongs decent people while rewarding the bad guys, and of a Europe eager to cooperate in its own destruction.

Go on over to GWOYKW and read the rest, and look at the photos. It’s a great job of first-hand reporting.

Hidden Assets

 
Newly rich?According to Fox News,

     On Friday, Iran’s Students News Agency reported Friday that Central Bank governor Ebrahim Sheibani said Iran had begun moving its foreign currency reserves from European banks and transferring them to an undisclosed location as protection against possible U.N. sanctions.

Does this mean that Dick Cheney is sitting on a pile of money?

Off to Sweden

 
Lund University, SwedenA couple of weeks ago a young man named Patrick emailed us wanting information about the town of Lund in Sweden, since he was considering attending the University there. I sought the advice of Scandinavian bloggers, and made a post out of it, The Color of Swedish Grass.

The issue was the proximity of Lund to Malmö, where there is a large Muslim population, and (according to some sources) a high incidence of rape and other crimes. There ensued a long argument in the comments, primarily between Anders, a Swede who lives in Malmö, and NoDhimmitude, who lived there for an extended period. NoDhimmitude is, however, Norwegian, and was at pains to emphasize that fact.

Each made an offer of help to Patrick in the comments, which I drew together into a follow-up post presenting their conflicting points of view.

As promised, I also emailed the same information to Patrick. Here is his reply:

     Hi, thanks for your reply. The two sides presented in the blog definitely were conflicting. What I didn’t like about the blog is that there were only 2 or 3 arguers, and there were almost no outside comments.
People that I have spoken to here that regularly go to Sweden tell me it’s safe. Besides, I live next to Compton. I’m sure LA’s much worse than Malmo. I’m not concerned so much about my personal safety. I just have this naive plan to leave the United States because I don’t like the direction that it’s going in, especially after Bush came into office. I have always idealized Europe, but I guess no place is perfect. I thought that Sweden would be a Utopia where one could life carefree, but that was just a fantasy.
Thanks,
Patrick

We can be thankful that he was at least disabused of his notion of Sweden as a Utopia. And I’m certain that Scandinavia will be a relief to him, a calm haven after the stress of living here under the increasingly fascistic Bush regime.

But there’s one thing I don’t understand — how did Patrick ever conclude that Gates of Vienna, of all places, would provide a reliable answer to his question?

Life is full of mysteries.

Blogging the Jihad in Trinidad and Tobago

 
Longtime Gates of Vienna commenter Uncle Pavian has started his own blog, Eleven North, and will be covering events in Trinidad and Tobago.

His most recent post concerns sheikh Yasin Abu Bakr:

Trinidad and Tobago Islamist leader Yasin Abu Bakr spent the night behind bars after a judge denied him bail and bound him over for trial on charges of terrorism, sedition, inciting larceny and breaching the peace.

Mr. Bakr is the leader of the Jamaat-al-Muslimeen, a group best known for a failed coup attempt on July 27, 1990, in which 24 people were killed.

You didn’t know the jihad was active in Trindad? Well, neither did I, until recently.

Go over to Uncle Pavian’s place to read the rest.

Jawa Hits the Jackpot!

Boy, what a way to celebrate a blogoversary:The Jawa Report helped catch a terrorist. Some people have all the luck!

Dr. Shackleford begins:

     Two years ago today I started blogging by warning in my very first post, If you think this is offensive, just wait til I really get going! What a way to celebrate my blogoversary!!!
The long awaited moment has arrived that I can reveal some of the details of The Jawa Report’s involvement in the capture of a would-be terrorist. Some of you already know some of the details as I have talked about them from time to time in a cryptic manner. I don’t want to overemphasize our role in the wannabe terrorists capture, nor do I wish to claim that the man now in custody would have been able to accomplish his stated goal of building and detonating a nuclear bomb in the United States–clearly he did not have that capacity–but this website did play a role in his capture.

Okay, he’s set the standard for the rest of us. Go have a cry in your beer ’cause it wasn’t your catch, pull up your socks, and get on the Jawa Wagon.

Read the rest here.

Update on Chetanand “Ashley” Sewraz

 
Chetanand ‘Ashley’ SewrazIn my post on Wednesday I talked about a young man in the southern suburbs of Richmond, Chetanand “Ashley” Sewraz, who is facing bombing and fraud charges. His activities do not seem to be jihad-related, but it is still a peculiar case.

Late last night my post must have been indexed by Google. Since then no fewer than twenty searchers for “Ashley Sewraz” or “Chetanand Sewraz” have found their way to Gates of Vienna. So somebody is looking for him.

Searches still don’t find him on Google News, and the only MSM site I can find him on is on MSNBC. So where are all these searchers coming from?

Then today commenter pbz23294 weighed in:

     I signed up for a blog account just so I could respond to you. I was offered a job by “Ashley” but I ended up not taking it because I was way too suspicious. He was going to pay me $56K a year to be an 80 hour a week assistant. Glad I didn’t take it.

Pbz23294: if you are reading this, please email me at the address on the left sidebar, or click here. We’d really like to know more.

Chirac’s Latest Nuclear Threat:"Grand ne Parlez de Rien"

 
The Washington Post has the story on President Jacques Chirac’s latest — heh — “threat”:

     … France was prepared to launch a nuclear strike against any country that sponsors a terrorist attack against French interests. He said his country’s nuclear arsenal had been reconfigured to include the ability to make a tactical strike in retaliation for terrorism.
“The leaders of states who would use terrorist means against us, as well as those who would envision using . . . weapons of mass destruction, must understand that they would lay themselves open to a firm and fitting response on our part,” Chirac said during a visit to a nuclear submarine base in Brittany. “This response could be a conventional one. It could also be of a different kind.”

So does this mean that his tactical strike will be on the Paris suburbs? Because that’s where the armaments very likely are stored even as he bloviates.

Don’t forget, France is Target Number One for the Algerian terrorists. They make our feelings for France look positively warm:

     In September 2005, the same month that the GSPC named France its “enemy number one,” authorities rounded up several members of the group who were allegedly planning attacks on the Paris metro, Orly airport, and the French intelligence headquarters.

Can you say “Algerian Salafist Group for Call and Combat”?* If you’re French, you might try using your cathedrals to start a campaign for a “French Catholic Group for Call and Prayer” because the nuclear terrorists have come ashore long ago, Chirac’s bluster notwithstanding.

Fall on your knees, France. You did it for Saddam, so you already have calluses in the right places. It’s the knack for folding your hands and closing your eyes which your people have forgotten.

Prayer may not cure what ails you but it’s a good start. Besides, it gives you something to do while you wait for the Algerian Armageddon that GSPC has planned just for you.

Besides, fervent prayer has this additional advantage: not only is it not radioactive, it has more efficacy than Chirac’s bluster.



See here for Dan Darling’s “Who Are These Guys?

Google This!

 
I noticed the headline of the main feature on the front page of the Richmond Times-Dispatch this morning:

The Feds Want to Know What You’re Googling

Well, good morning, America!

The story started last summer when the White House wanted Google to provide a week’s slice of searches plus a sample of the URLs in Google’s databases, in order to figure out how to track more effectively the people who look for and traffic in child pornography.

We all know MSM version of the story by now: a further example of the Bush Administration’s intrusion into the lives of ordinary citizens, erosion of our civil liberties, trampling on the Constitution, etc blah yak. Remember, these are the pals of Al Gore and Hillary Clinton, who want to control the internet for our own good.

But when it’s the Republicans doing it, why, that’s different.

Isn’t that right, Mr. Mainstream Journalist? Or are you worried that they might find out that you were searching last night for “topless photos pamela anderson”? Hmm? Or maybe even “directory of dominatrixes in ann arbor”…?

Since I am somewhat of a libertarian, I have sympathy with people who resent the idea of the government watching what we do. I don’t like Uncle Sam looking over my shoulder, either.

But given the kinds of searches that send people to Gates of Vienna, I wouldn’t mind too much if the Feds found out about some of these people. Hell, I’d send ’em the IP addresses myself.

Dymphna has PTSD, so she can’t stand to look at the search word referrals on our site meter. (WARNING: Dymphna, if you are reading this, stop now! DO. NOT. READ. FURTHER.)

How about all the people who arrive here searching for “kill jews” or “I hate jews”? And all the ones wanting to know “how to make a bomb”? Or the perennial favorite, “how to make a bomb jihad”?

Not to mention all the people who use Google as an oracle to answer “did bill gates convert to islam?”

There are people who find their way here by typing “sex with little girls” and “filipino sex slave”. People who want to know more about “raping little girls”.

Then there are the peculiar or pathetic ones like “naked muslim women” and “bathing suit hijab”.

But mostly it’s “how to make a bomb”, over and over again, with occasional variants, such as “how to kill infidels”.

I tell you, it’s depressing sometimes to read the “search words ranked by visits” section of our site meter.

However, I’m not giving up all hope. The other day, someone with an IP address in Austria found us by searching for “how to defeat the jihad”.

If we find out, let’s let him know.

Is France a WMD?

 
So what would it be like if we hadn’t gone into Iraq? If Saddam were still in power? If the French had their way, we’d still be negotiating, wouldn’t we? While they sneered at the Cowboy’s paranoia and lies about WMD and blustered in the UN, Saddam would still be on the throne.

But leaving the quesitons about weapons aside, and bracketing for a moment the unspeakable misery of the Iraqi people under Saddam’s heel, consider what his remaining in power would have meant for the further training and dispersal of terrorists throughout the world.

In fact, look at the wide swathe of infection he spread before the Coalition Forces took him down.

In “The Algerian Plague,” The Weekly Standard assesses the damage:

     According to officials, one of the groups trained in Iraq prior to the war was al Qaeda’s Algerian affiliate, the Algerian Salafist Group for Call and Combat (“GSPC”). The GSPC and its predecessor, the Armed Islamic Group (“GIA”), are well-known to European counterterrorism officials: Within the last several months, in fact, the GSPC has been at the center of several substantive terrorist plots.

Spain arrested 20 suspected terrorists last week in Madrid, Barcelona and the Basque region. They included Moroccans, Spaniards, a Turk and an Algerian.

But they aren’t the only ones. Spain has been arresting “numerous” GSPC members over the last few years:

     According to one Spanish daily, the judge’s writ stated that the GSPC has “a vast financing activity based on a constant labor of common crime,” which includes “drug retailing, offences against property” as well as “forgery of documents and credit or phone cards.” The judge’s writ also noted the close ties between the GSPC and bin Laden’s al Qaeda.

And Italy? The author of the article describes Italy as a “crossroads” —

     … for Islamists seeking access to Europe from the Middle East—[and]has also been recently targeted by the GSPC. In November 2005, Italian authorities arrested three Algerians affiliated with the group. Authorities had been eavesdropping on the suspects for some time. Through intercepted phone conversations and bugging devices they learned of the Algerian’s plans for a massive terror attack.

But France is the preferred target. France, the soft underbelly of Europe, the hated colonial power in Algeria. Her chickens have come home to roost and to riot:

     “The only way to make France disciplined is jihad and Islamic martyrdom,” a September 2005 statement from the GSPC’s leadership reads, “France is our enemy number one, the enemy of our religion, the enemy of our community.” (The group also accused the Algerian president of ruling in France’s name.)
In January 2005, French authorities arrested 11 suspected terrorists with ties to the GSPC. Like their brethren in the Spanish cell, the 11 were charged with recruiting suicide bombers to send to Iraq.
In September 2005, the same month that the GSPC named France its “enemy number one,” authorities rounded up several members of the group who were allegedly planning attacks on the Paris metro, Orly airport, and the French intelligence headquarters.

The connections between bin Laden and Saddam Hussein were close and long-standing:

     THE GIA’S HISTORY is especially notable because both bin Laden and Saddam took an early interest in the group. Bin Laden’s “Arab Afghans” were among the first leaders of the GIA in the early 1990s. His patronage proved especially beneficial as hundreds of former veterans from the war in Afghanistan were redeployed to Algeria to swell the GIA’s ranks. By some accounts, bin Laden is said to have personally arranged for the financing and necessary travel documents to be provided to upwards of 1,000 “Arab Afghans” who returned or relocated to Algerian soil.
But bin Laden did not just finance the building of the GIA with money from his own pockets. He also received help from Saddam Hussein: At least one former CIA official has confirmed that some of the money bin Laden funneled to the GIA came from Saddam’s Iraq.

These two played ball together for a long, long time. And all the while France, mendacious France, thought she could contain the terrorists on her own soil while continuing to draw down the illicit oil money from Iraq.

The French look more like criminals with each passing day. Meanwhile, the hatred and death they spawned in Algeria continues to infect Europe and the Middle East with a virulent strain of terrorism and death.

Could it be? Is France herself a kind of Weapon of Mass Destruction?



The author of this essay in the Weekly Standard, Thomas Joscelyn, has good sources, including former American intelligence people. This post has only touched on his material.

“Transformational Diplomacy”

 
Using a phrase from her Senate confirmation hearings, Dr. Rice gave a broad outline of the sea change about to happen at the State Department.

In a speech at Georgetown University, reported by The Washington Times Insider, the Secretary of State outlined broad changes at Foggy Bottom:

     The United States will shift hundreds of its diplomats from Washington and Europe to emerging countries over the next few years as part of a broad reconfiguration of the Foreign Service and its mission… U.S. envoys would be asked to spend less time on traditional diplomacy — monitoring political developments and talking to officials — and more time traveling outside the capitals “to help foreign citizens better their own lives.”
[…]
The United States has “nearly the same number of State Department personnel in Germany — a country of 82 million people — that we have in India — a country of 1 billion people,” she said. There are “nearly 200 cities worldwide with over 1 million people in which the United States has no formal diplomatic presence.”

Perhaps, Dr. Rice, we could begin with a more visible presence in the Ivory Coast? Ivorians could certainly use some of that transformational diplomacy now that the French have had their way with them.

We could call it “transformational compassionate diplomacy.” Anything to annoy the French.

The Ivory Coast Wants Bush to Kick Out Chirac

Wretchard’s current analysis of our “Post-post colonial World” not only has his usual trenchant commentary, it’s also rich with links to information you won’t find in many other places.

Here’s an example, which begins with EU Referendum, a blog in the UK, which links to Farg France (sorry, this is a family site. I like the sentiment, though), which in turn drills down to a story in African News Dimension, which unfortunately has archived the story behind its premium wall. However, FF has the whole of the story on its site:

     Saturday, 14 January 2006
African News Dimension
By Kalou Louis Tra
Wot th’-?!Commotions between the rebels and the French army after French soldiers allegedly raped young girls and stripped them naked for pornography scenes in the north of Ivory Coast. Another tough year has begun for Ivorians as a dispute rose between the rebels and the French troops positioned in the north of Ivory cost, precisely in Niakaramadougou.
Although they were very happy when the French troop first arrived on their territory as their backup force in the alleged plot against Laurent Gbagbo, the rebels today are very angry.
The French soldiers are alleged to have robed 58,000 euros from the Ivorians’ reserve bank last year and are said to have entered in another venture that displeased even they rebels themselves.
The French soldiers are accused of kidnapping young girls between 16 and 22 to for a strip show. Some soldiers are said to be giving US$1.50 to the girls when they are hostile to their disgraceful scenes.
The residents after receiving several complaints from some of the girls have confronted the French army, forcing the rebels to intervene.
When the news broke in Katiola, another town 250 miles away from Niakaramadougou, the residents of that town became very furious and have according to one leader of the community, the people want all the rebels occupying their territories out. They allege the rebels are in cohorts with the French soldiers.
A resident of the town of Katiola said, “Those rebels and their Europeans friends, we will chase them ourselves, we cannot accept this awful behavior any longer.” He adds: “When you are riding on a bicycle to your farm, on the road they demand you pay US$5, sometime more”.
“Now that we heard that the rebels and their French have been disgraceful toward us, our children and our people, we are going to chase them ourselves by all means.”
The accusation of the French went even far when a man in tears said her daughter after been raped several times by the French soldiers has been forced to make love to a dog.
Reports say that the rebels have already asked the French soldiers to leave Niakaramadougou and Katiola in the next 2 days. The rebels’ representative in the North who refused to be identified said, “Everything else is maybe acceptable but a pornography scene with a dog is unbelievable and therefore unacceptable in our African custom.”

”Everything else is maybe acceptable”?? Dear Lord in heaven.

So these are the French, the ones who criticize us for Gitmo? For Iraq? Well, here’s their own Le Monde Diplomatique last April:

     The actions of the French Operation Unicorn peacekeeping force in the former French west African colony of Ivory Coast have exposed the greed and seaminess of France’s dual role as both mediator and participant.

EU Referendum, from which this quote is taken, has more details on the history of Operation Unicorn.

It also asks this question of the British:

     The behaviour of the French raises the question as to why Blair is not bringing up the Ivory Coast issue through the European Council (he could have, for instance, raised it through the UK presidency period), especially as he has made poverty in Africa a priority issue. But it also raises the question as to whether we can afford to be associated with the French military; whether – to paraphrase Margaret Thatcher – these are people with whom we can, or should do business.

Indeed!

EU Referendum finishes with a flourish about the media “hacks” watching America’s every move in Iraq:

     Above all though, this issue points up the indolence and hypocrisy of our media. While the hacks are quite happy to slag off the American administration and military – from the comfort of their luxury hotels in the Baghdad Green Zone, protected by the lives of those very troops they so detest – none of the professionals who employ them and use their copy have stirred themselves to find out what is going on the Ivory Coast, and report it.

Good heavens, and miss an opportunity to observe an American mis-step in the quagmire? A thousand times “non” to you, sir. After all, what interest is there in a few little black girls in a hot, unruly place where one might get hurt?

Don’t you wonder sometimes, about the karma of the MSM? Don’t you wonder what they’re racking up for the next life? Ponder it, as we slowly dismantle their sorry gold-bricking asses.

Huff, Huff! Last Week’s Council Winners

Watcher's CouncilThis week’s first place went to The Glittering Eye for his excellent essay “Perspectives on Foreign Command of U. S. Forces.” This is dense essay, not easily taken apart for discussion. However, here’s the setting for his subject:

     The U. S. is allergic to placing its military forces under foreign command. The current U. S. military doctrine is that, while its forces may be placed under foreign command, they are never placed under foreign operational control. Whether the president has the power to place U. S. forces under foreign operational control is a topic for legal scholars and is beyond the scope of this post but the reality is that at least four presidents have placed U. S. forces under both foreign command and foreign operational control.

We’re “allergic” to foreign command of U. S. Forces because our military is built upon very different assumptions from that of other countries. You can begin with the class differences, so sharp among European classes, and so absent in our Army. Dwight Eisenhower would never have made it to Sandhurst.

New Sisyphus took second place for Misogyny Day, his post on the Canadian massacre of the girls in a Montreal schoolroom back in the ‘70’s. Like the rest of us, New Sisyphus is disgusted at learning that the incident was not about “Western man’s horrific violence against women.” When you discover that the killer was not “Marc Lepine,” as he claimed, but in reality was a Muslim named Gamil Gharbi, as New Sisyphus says,

     …all you have is yet another sad example of Islam’s disfunctional and completely over-the-top misogyny.

Another fable presented to us by the MSM and the lying elites. They have no shame in pushing their agenda, as you will see in one of the non-council posts, below.

This week’s non-council winner, Patterico’s Los Angeles Dog Trainer Year in Review 2005 deserves his spot just for all the work he put into it. Besides which, you have to admire anyone dedicated to exposing The Los Angeles Times for what it is. Right up front, Patterico sums it up:

     This post summarizes an entire year’s worth of work documenting omissions, distortions, and misrepresentations by this newspaper. When someone truly takes the time to provide specific examples of liberal bias in the news media, the result can be voluminous, and this post is no exception. Feel free to bookmark it and return to it in the coming days, browsing through the categories as they interest you.

He’s not kidding, either, about the sheer volume of their perfidy. Well worth your time. And I freely admit my bias, I love anyone who exposes the Old Grey Doxy in New York City, or her West Coast echo companion, The Dog Trainer. Patterico is a man after my own heart.

There was a tie for second place between Maxed Out Mama and Protein Wisdom.

M.O.M’s Stuck on Thought means exactly that. She ponders two issues which do not have clear boundaries or answers, and she asks you to follow along with her.One bit of her wisdom is well worth consideration. She says that anger does not corrode the soul (as Judge Cashman claimed) but Hate sure does….food for thought. Maybe someone could point out her post to His Honor.

Protein Wisdom‘s subject matter is closely aligned with New Sisyphus, above. His post is concerned about the dominant [perception of] reality and who will be allowed to control that reality.
In “We Love the Troops; But It’s a Tough Love (#144) – UPDATED,” PW terms the present moment as a postmodern one in which reality is granted to those who control the dominant narrative:

     That such can be done purposely and cynically-and with full knowledge that the narrative is manufactured to persuade rather than to inform-is simply part of the game.
Which is why it is imperative that those of us who are concerned that epistemology not simply become a playground for those with the biggest bullhorn and a philosophy that unabashedly adopts a strategy whereby the ends justify the means, must consistently and painstakingly point out the rhetorical gambits and animating power structures that drives what orchestrated oppo research hopes will become ossified narratives-“contingent truths”-which increase in power over time and with pedagogical canonization, airbrushing of inconvenient counterclaims, and repetition.

Well and truly said. And this struggle is going to be a long one.

Interesting point: three of the four winning posts this week have to do with aspects of the perception of reality. All three, from varying perspectives, question or disparage the common wisdom. Perhaps because it has ceased to be either common or wise?

All the nominations are over at the Watcher’s place. Quite an offering.

Mexico Red Zone: A Funded Program, Shelved.

 
Jerry Seper, the Washington Times reporter lauded by Tony Blankley for his accurate reporting on the Mexican border situation, says today that an Arizona Congressional representative, Rick Renzi, wrote to Secretary of State Rice describing the events at our border with Mexico as “narco-terrorism in its purest form:”

     “Our borders are under attack by sophisticated organizations that have no qualms about firing on our Border Patrol units,” Mr. Renzi said. “As we get tougher and more committed, so do the organizations committed to smuggling death and terror our borders.”

The State Department responded with Foggy Bottom Speak, claiming that:

  • they are “in touch with the Mexican government when incidents occur,”
  • “they are usually resolved at that time at the local level.”

Oh, of course. Nothing going on here. So what about Homeland Security’s take on the subject? Well, director Michael Chertoff claims that:

  • “Mexican military incursions average about 20 a year, but were declining.
  • concern over the issue is “overblown” and “scare tactics.”
  • significant number of these incursions were “innocent,”
  • Mexican police or military may step across the border chasing criminals because they don’t know where the line is.” (despite their GPS units??)
  • Sometimes criminals are dressed in military-type clothing and thus may appear to be soldiers when they’re just crooks.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, Rep. Renzi has different information:

     The U.S. Border Patrol recently warned agents in Arizona of military incursions by Mexican soldiers “trained to escape, evade and counter-ambush” if detected. The warning follows increased sightings of what authorities describe as heavily armed Mexican military units on the U.S. side of the border.
While the Mexican government has vigorously denied that its military is crossing into the U.S., Mr. Renzi said that during a tour of the Arizona border last month in a U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement (ICE) helicopter, the pilot showed him military-style humvees lining up at dusk just south of the border to move drugs into the U.S.
He said the preparations occur nightly, noting that 50 percent of the drugs coming into this country pass though the Arizona desert.

Renzi is rightly concerned. As are other states that share borders with Mexico:

     “The Border Patrol knows they’re coming but they are outmanned and outgunned,” he said. “We need military technology to combat these military operations.”
Mr. Renzi also said states such as Arizona should be able to supplement federal border enforcement with federally financed state border guard units. He said states can react quickly to new border threats, and that the federal government is unable to graduate enough new agents.
“Border states are tired of waiting for a secure border,” he said.

Now who are you going to believe? The State Department and Homeland Security or the U.S. Border Patrol and Representative Renzi’s lying eyes?

Renzi is not just pushing air through his lungs. He has a program, ready to go:

     Mr. Renzi said radar-equipped aerostat balloons now on the border have forced airplanes that previously brought drugs into the United States to “land short,” about 120 miles south of the border where the drugs are transferred to vehicles to be driven across the border. He said the balloons could be mounted with sensors to detect the approach of drug smugglers and “the muscle that protects them.”
He is the author of a $50 million border intelligence pilot program known as “Red Zone Defense,” which was included in the Department of Homeland Security’s appropriation bill. It would coordinate the sharing of intelligence on border security information in Cochise County, Ariz., an area of the border that has become the nation’s most popular drug and alien smuggling corridor.
Mr. Renzi said the two-year program would use airships, aerostats and unmanned aerial vehicles for surveillance that could pinpoint the exact location of drug smugglers on the border. He said that would give Border Patrol agents increased security.
The program, although funded, has not been implemented.

REPEAT: The program, although funded, has not been implemented.