Political leaders and the media normally play on our heart strings by showcasing the suffering of the Puir Wee Bairns of the Third World. It’s always about the kids — that way, anyone who opposes the proposed policy (whatever it might be) is a heartless wretch, an amalgam of Ebenezer Scrooge and Adolf Hitler.

When it comes to the “refugees” pouring into Europe, however, there’s a problem: almost none of them are puir wee bairns. The vast majority of them are military-age men. Some of them pretend to be “unaccompanied minors” to game the asylum system, but almost all of those swarthy heavy-bearded fellows turn out to be full-grown men.

Now it seems the Powers That Be have hit upon a solution to the puir wee bairn problem: any woman who is a victim of domestic violence qualifies for asylum protection in the EU. Which means virtually 100% of the female population south of the Mediterranean or east of Aqaba. And most of those puir battered wives have plenty of wee bairns to bring in with them when they arrive. Then later their husbands can join them under family reunification policies!

What better system could be devised?

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the Austrian portal Heimatkurier:

300 million people entitled to asylum: ECJ declares domestic violence to be a legitimate reason for fleeing

The European Court of Justice recently made a momentous decision. According to a recent ruling, experiencing domestic or sexual violence is enough to be eligible for asylum in the European Union. This suddenly turns hundreds of millions of women worldwide into potential asylum seekers .

The European Court of Justice has repeatedly been noted for fueling population exchange in the EU member states with questionable decisions. This was also the case last Tuesday. A landmark decision in Luxembourg ruled that domestic violence can be a legitimate reason for asylum in Europe. According to “Brot für die Welt/ Bread for the World”, this affects almost 300 million women worldwide — who, at least according to the ECJ, now all enjoy the right to asylum in Europe.

Kurdish woman fled from forced Islamic marriage

The case in which the fatal verdict was pronounced was an ethnic Kurdish woman with Turkish nationality. She was forced to marry as a child and got divorced. In the Islamic world, this often results in honor killings. The European Court of Justice has now ruled that women are considered refugees if “they are exposed to physical or psychological violence, including sexual violence and domestic violence, in their country of origin because of their gender.”

Honor killings have long been imported into Europe

Particularly bizarre: Through the population exchange, the practices from which the Kurdish woman is actually seeking protection have long since been imported to Europe. Honor killings are commonplace, especially among the imported clans. Forced Islamic marriages and child marriages also take place again and again, albeit hidden from the public.

Asylum is completely unrestricted

The judgment is an example of the ECJ’s increasing delimitation of the right to asylum. The question arises as to where the line should be drawn — should victims of bullying or death threats also be entitled to asylum in the future? If you follow the logic of liberal extremism, there is probably no one in the world who cannot concoct a reason to flee. An example of this is the demand of the African-born Green Party politician Aminata Touré — she wants to recognize genital mutilation “unconditionally” as a reason for asylum.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading →