The End of Free Speech and Thought in Europe

The Deep State oligarchs who manage the European Union are absolutely determined that the serfs, peons, and other Untermenschen of Europe must be silenced by any means necessary. Those ignorant yokels have no business meddling in affairs of state, which must be left to their betters to run as they see fit — and all for the good of the “people”, of course.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the Austrian portal Heimatkurier. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

EU censorship law: “Hate speech” on a par with terrorism and human trafficking

Through a resolution by the EU Parliament, laws against “hate speech” are to be introduced in all EU countries. But the ostensible “fight against hate” aims to censor and suppress the political opposition and its supporters. At this year’s WEF meeting in Davos, resolutions were also passed to massively expand censorship. On January 18, the EU Parliament passed a new law that makes so-called “hate speech” a crime throughout the EU.

The vote was clear in the left-center dominated parliament: 397 yes votes, 121 no votes and 26 abstentions.

“Hate speech” is equated with terrorism

The decision puts so-called “hate speech” on the EU crime list. This allows the European Commission to introduce binding legislation and penalties for all member states. The list actually only includes crimes that have a “cross-border interest” in combating them, such as terrorism, human trafficking or cartel crime. This puts people who post politically unpleasant content on the Internet on the same level as terrorists and drug cartel gangsters. The EU has already threatened social media platforms with sanctions and regulations. [And that comes out of the mouth from one of the biggest terrorist and human trafficking organizations on the planet and against their own people. Go figure.]

“Hate speech”: A vague definition

This massive expansion of thought paragraphs serves the sole purpose of persecuting politically disapproved people and opinions. The official statement already gives an idea of these intentions. It is said that hate speech is “a danger to society as a whole because it undermines the foundations of the EU”. The definition of alleged hate crimes is up in the air and can be interpreted in any way. Basically, anything that a person perceives as offensive or hurtful may be interpreted as hate speech and can therefore soon be charged. There are no clear definitions or control bodies. [That’s the whole point with these so-called LAWS. They are not designed to protect the people, but rather the parasites in politics and society.]

Will gender criticism soon lead to a stretch in prison?

According to the current definition, “criminal discrimination” refers to the alleged denigration of origin, ethnicity or religion. However, left-liberal law makers want to massively expand this definition because, in their eyes, it is no longer up-to-date. In the future, any alleged discrimination against sexuality, sex and gender characteristics, trans identities as well as age and disability would also constitute a criminal offense. It is impossible to predict who will be targeted by the muzzle paragraph. This may affect people who criticize the adoption rights for homosexuals as well as critics of drag queen reading lessons in kindergartens.

Internet target

The real calculation of the left-liberal EU Parliament is to prosecute thought crimes on the Internet. The left-wing EU MEP Maite Pagazaurtundúa from Spain said this quite openly: “Social media has in particular promoted hostile narrative patterns.” The people responsible for this supposed threat may also be quickly found: populists and extremists. But these laws may ultimately affect anyone.

Police hunt the posters of hate instead of real criminals

The EU initiative is primarily aimed at introducing and expanding its censorship measures in Eastern European countries. In German-speaking countries, these dystopian conditions, which might have come from the pen of George Orwell, are already a bitter reality. In the Federal Republic alone there have already been nine nationwide (!) “days of action against hate-posting.” Last June there were 130 police operations due to online satire and government criticism. An “insult” against Annalena Baerbock triggered a police operation on a journalist. The warning about rapists from Afghanistan earned the AfD politician Marie-Therese Kaiser a conviction for sedition. While politicians tie up police resources, real criminals and violent criminals have a free hand.

WEF also wants to expand censorship

With this initiative, the EU Parliament is pursuing the same interests as the notorious World Economic Forum in Davos. At this year’s meeting, the global fight against “disinformation” was appropriately made a top priority — fittingly presented by EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. The definition is made arbitrarily and according to one’s own interests. The alleged fight against “disinformation” is directed exclusively against people, opinions and media that are not part of the globalist cartel.

Afterword from the translator:

In my humble opinion this is another reason — among a myriad others — to dissolve the EU. I’m so tired of this paternalism by these people. The only thing they all want from us is blind obedience, otherwise we should shut up and knuckle down in their presence. Anyone who doesn’t notice where the train is heading is in dire straits. What is currently going on in the EU and Germany may be compared 1:1 to 1933. One has to acknowledge that the year of 2024 is of utmost importance for the world, especially for the Western world and the freedom and fundamental rights of humanity. In 2024 the globalists’ wings must be clipped, or preferably shot down in total.

If this does not succeed, I see dark times, real dark times, ahead for the Western world. The globalists are increasing their resources to advance the Great Reset. The digital ID and digital money are ready and are about to be introduced. All that’s missing is the right moment, and the people will be completely monitored/enslaved. For this purpose, wars, disasters, pandemics, emergencies, climate, lockdowns, travel restrictions and curfews are the means that will be used to imprison and monitor us. Anyone who doesn’t stand up now wants socialism and life in an open-air prison. The clock is ticking! All need to RISE UP against these monsters. We cannot do this alone.

10 thoughts on “The End of Free Speech and Thought in Europe

  1. I assume that anti-mohammedan speech is hate speech, even if it is as simple as quoting from the 3 “holy” books.
    How does this mesh, in reality, with the hate speech from those same books,
    concerning the letter people?

  2. We’re going to need this again!

    Die Gedanken sind frei, wer kann sie erraten,
    sie fliehen vorbei wie nächtliche Schatten.
    Kein Mensch kann sie wissen, kein Jäger sie schießen
    es bleibet dabei: Die Gedanken sind frei!

    Ich denke was ich will und was mich beglücket,
    doch alles in der Still’, und wie es sich schicket.
    Mein Wunsch und Begehren kann niemand verwehren,
    es bleibet dabei: Die Gedanken sind frei!

    Und sperrt man mich ein im finsteren Kerker,
    das alles sind rein vergebliche Werke;
    denn meine Gedanken zerreißen die Schranken
    und Mauern entzwei: die Gedanken sind frei.

    Thoughts are free, who can guess them?
    They fly by like nocturnal shadows.
    No person can know them, no hunter can shoot them
    and so it’ll always be: Thoughts are free!

    I think what I want, and what delights me,
    still always reticent, and as it is suitable.
    My wish and desire, no one can deny me
    and so it’ll always be: Thoughts are free!

    And if I am thrown into the darkest dungeon,
    all these are futile works,
    because my thoughts tear all gates
    and walls apart: Thoughts are free!

  3. But we can beat them with their own weapons:

    – Everything in Islamic “holy” scripture pertaining to “unbelievers” or “kuffar” classifies as hate speech under this law, if interpreted strictly.
    – All the vitriol that feminists spit at men for their alleged “toxicity” etcetera, classifies as hate speech under this law if interpreted strictly.
    – Every time the racism card is played against any criticism of migrants which points out their socially corrosive behaviours, rampant opportunism and inherited moral values incompatible with the laws and mores of the host society, it is hate speech under this law if interpreted strictly.
    – Any other occasion when exponents of collectivist ideologies seek to suppress individual expressions of disagreement, this classifies as hate speech under this law if interpreted strictly. It is already illegal as it violates a basic human right which defines constitutionality in our societies, but the corruption already reaches into the highest levels of many jurisdictions, whereby the system renders itself inconsistent.

    What needs to happen is that each and every instance of the above, no matter how big or small, is brought before the courts tasked with enforcing these laws, and escalated through the instances until successful or exhausted. Every time a claim is rejected or even refused to be heard, it still becomes a permanent record and contributes to build up pressure to change this atrocity, and to amend all the injustice done.

    For this to succeed, we need to keep presenting the facts, cold and untarnished by emotionality, every single time a contradiction occurs and never stop. We can learn from the Samurai spirit: Be calm and controlled, never let your emotions dominate you because this only ever feeds the enemy. And be relentless!

  4. The banning of so-called “hate speech” is a smokescreen for the powers-that-be banning criticism of their policies. Anyone who really thinks that these various authorities and functionaries care about the feelings of recent arrivals from places like the Middle East is either a dupe or a true-believer. The mandarins at the EU who wish to ban freedom of expression are pushing censorship because they want to outlaw dissent against their policies and those of their globalist collaborators.

  5. So I’m still allowed to say “Sharia Is [Solid Waste]-Don’t Put Up With It” … right?
    I mean , what’s wrong with that ?
    It’s a perfectly legitimate concern.

    Although I do think a better one is :

    DAVOS – ONE CRUISE MISSILE
    ( Take Out The Garbage )

    Cheers 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.