Time to Take Off the Rose-Colored Glasses

The two videos below discuss the remarks made by a former French intelligence agent, who has sparked a controversy with his statements about the inevitable Islamization of France, and all of Europe.

RAIR Foundation provides this background for the videos:

Former DGSE (General Directorate for External Security) agent Pierre Martinet, who served in a specialized French intelligence agency, delivered a chilling warning about the impending Islamic threat to Europe in an interview on the Les Bâtisseurs podcast.

Martinet, a veteran of the 3rd Marine Infantry Parachute Regiment (3e RPIMa), foresees a terrifying future where Europe faces complete Islamization within the next 50-70 years. The portion of the interview presented below unravels the profound ideological threat posed by Islam, particularly the role of the Muslim Brotherhood, in the unsettling transformation of Europe. Watch the video, which has been translated into English by RAIR Foundation USA, to gain a deep understanding of this alarming prediction and the urgent threat it raises.

Many thanks to HeHa for the translations, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling.

The first video shows excerpts from the TV interview Mr. Martinet:

center>

The second video features a panel discussion on the topic from French television:

Video transcript #1:

00:00   In my opinion, the part about violent action,
00:03   all that attacks, armed Islamist groups, Al-Qaeda…
00:06   It’s where the tip of the iceberg emerges. —Exactly.
00:09   It’s what is the least productive. The financing is something intermediate,
00:15   it is needed at all levels: the countries that fund Salafism,
00:18   the countries that fund mosques, the countries of the Maghreb, etc.
00:23   But the most important part, the most important and the most effective,
00:27   more effective than Kalashnikovs or plastic explosives,
00:32   is the ideological part.
00:35   And this ideological part, it’s the religious demands of daily life
00:39   that are, little by little, that are munching, little by little… on the…
00:44   How should I say it? I mean that in France they are munching on the dike of secularism.
00:49   But in Europe, such a dike does not exist,
00:52   because only France has what is called the well-known secularism,
00:56   but which is more adapted to this new threat.
01:00   And the project will go on till completion. They don’t have the same notion of time that we do.
01:07   The West has the watch, but they have the time.
01:11   So, it will go all the way to the end.
01:14   So, I’m not going to get into a two-sided controversy,
01:19   and in a more political way,
01:22   but you know, there’s always this notion of great…
01:25   This famous “great replacement” certain people talk about.
01:28   I think that speaking of that was wrong. I prefer to talk about an Islamist project.
01:32   And this Islamist project, indeed, is to Islamize Europe as much as possible.
01:41   I’m not talking about France, I’m talking about Europe. And it’s really…
01:44   It’s really… well underway.
01:47   That’s not very optimistic. —No, no, but I’m… No, no, I’m absolutely realistic.
01:51   I won’t see all that, I will be dead before that. But…
01:55   My generation won’t see it. The next generation, maybe not.
01:59   But the following generation, yes.
02:02   In… 50, 70 years.
02:06   It will go to completion. Because there’s…
02:09   This ideological force is more important than anything.
02:13   Than anything we can… And that’s why, at the beginning of our interview,
02:16   I was talking about weakness. And we’ve become weak in the face of that.
 

Video transcript #2:

00:00   “France will be Islamized by the end of the century”
00:04   So we’re going to ask ourselves, Mathieu Bock-Côté: will France be totally Islamized
00:08   50 to 70 years from now? This is the statement,
00:11   in the context of an interview by Tocsin Media on YouTube,
00:14   with a former DGSE [Directorate-General for external security] agent.
00:18   So, to some people, the statement sounds apocalyptic; for others, it’s a given.
00:24   You care, however, for getting back, in your second edition,
00:27   to this question, while waiting for the press conference with the head of state, in a moment. Why?
00:31   Yes, there’s a big contrast. On one hand, the press conference,
00:34   the political game, and on the other: will we still exist in a century?
00:37   Well… —Question for the president. Good question.
00:41   But in fact, the question we could ask him,
00:44   if you will allow me, in fact, the question we could ask him is: “If France, in a century,
00:48   is half Muslim, for example — I’m digressing — but if France is half Muslim,
00:54   or two-thirds Muslim, would it still be France?
00:57   It would be an interesting question to ask him, and the answer they could give,
01:00   because I’ve already heard it from several politicians, is: “It’s not a big deal.”
01:03   “France is indifferent to the religious beliefs of the various parties”.
01:07   So, and I’ve already heard this sentence, even from representatives of what they call
01:11   the far right, from time to time. So, they probably wanted to provide guarantees.
01:14   But what’s interesting, would be a question to ask: if France completely changed religion, culture,
01:18   would it still be France? Or would it simply evolve?
01:21   Because, besides those who will say it’s unimaginable,
01:24   and others for whom it would be apocalyptic, there will also be those who will say to us:
01:28   “It’s not a big deal.” Having said that, I started to digress, or something.
01:32   We like that, we like that. So the essential topic is: that statement.
01:35   In fact, why do we stick to that phrase? Because it represents the state of mind
01:40   of so many people, and since we are not speaking of an intellectual,
01:43   or a chronicler, or a columnist,
01:46   he says things with a certain brutality,
01:50   but which correspond to the state of mind of many people.
01:53   They correspond to the state of mind of Michel Houellebecq, for example,
01:56   who told us in his book “Submission”, he finally told us about the shift of Europe,
02:00   in a scenario, that is, where Islam used to be a minority in France,
02:04   but has become the cornerstone on which a shift of civilization is operating.
02:08   What does this DGSE agent tell us? Well, in brief, he tells us that terrorism is terrible.
02:13   Of course, we all agree. We have lived in fear of terrorist attacks since 2015,
02:19   or even since 2012, if we think of Mohammed Merah.
02:22   But, he tells us that terrorist attacks are not the main threat.
02:27   Another threat, he tells us, is the funding that comes from abroad
02:31   to fund the Islamization of France, and more broadly, of Europe.
02:35   It is a danger, he says, but is not the main danger.
02:38   The main danger, he tells us,
02:41   is what he calls the religious, ideological demands of everyday life.
02:47   Ah, that’s interesting. So, he wants us to understand that he will not discuss demography,
02:51   but that he wants to discuss Islamism. We could answer him politely that Islamism
02:55   has little chance of progressing in an environment that would traditionally be French,
02:59   on a demographic and cultural level. But whatever he means, he mentions it,
03:03   and says that’s the real danger. Because religious, Islamic, Islamist demands are multiplying.
03:10   We yield to these demands every day, every week, every month, every year,
03:16   and little by little, the ground is given up.
03:19   Little by little, the ground, a form of capitulation operates, day by day.
03:24   And he tells us, because I’m describing his state of mind, I’m describing what he’s telling us,
03:28   all of this, for him, is an Islamist project.
03:31   So, not a conspiracy, apparently, but an Islamist project
03:35   thought up by — I’ll come back to this in a moment —
03:38   the Muslim Brotherhood, for the coming 50 or 70 years.
03:42   So, we have to understand that we won’t see it. He tells us our children won’t see it either.
03:47   our grandchildren might not see it, but then it will shift, people will enable the shift.
03:51   So, he presents this scenario to us as the most probable for the future of Europe.
03:55   He’s someone who looks at it from within. —And his words, about this old DGSE agenda,
04:00   do you think they are convincing? —Halfway. Halfway, but because I think he’s too optimistic.
04:05   I’ll explain. —So, there you go. —Mrs. Bergeaud-Blackler told us about it,
04:09   in a very good work that we know today, “The Muslim Brotherhood and its networks”.
04:12   She told us about the Islamist project for the conquest of Europe.
04:16   But this project is nothing but just one element among others of the shift of civilization
04:20   we are witnessing. I’ll explain that it’s much more than what this gentleman describes.
04:24   If it just were an offensive of conquest, we could respond to an offensive of conquest,
04:28   but it’s much more than that. So, I’ll describe the different stages of what we know,
04:32   then we’ll try to see where we are now, in this shift of civilization.
04:35   First, there is massive immigration. First and foremost, we must always come back to this,
04:39   which is massive immigration that comes by demographic pressure, but which is also organized.
04:43   We see it is, in particular, at the request of the EU, which wants this massive immigration,
04:47   which wishes it, organizes it, plans it.
04:50   Then, the demographic pressure is so huge
04:53   that it changes our social-demographic balances, and so on.
04:57   Territories are shifting, replacements are created.
05:00   People want a form of Franco-French ghettoization to be created, more ghettoization emerges,
05:05   they face one other, face to face. The welcoming society is hit by an incapacitating virus.
05:09   We must understand this; because we were convinced that it was xenophobic to defend ourselves.
05:13   But a part of the welcoming population will rise up in one way or another,
05:17   either brutally — we must question it, we must always condemn violence —
05:20   or democratically, by voting for populists.
05:23   We will come to the important moment, when public authorities decide to turn against
05:28   the welcoming population who refuse to accept this demographic shift,
05:31   who refuse to accept this dispossession. So the government will turn against the nation,
05:35   to force them to accept massive immigration.
05:38   One day, we will see that the shift will have taken place.
05:42   One day, this kind of overwhelming will be consecrated.
05:45   And in historical terms, once all this is over, in 50 or 70 years, or a century, we’ll see,
05:50   when all this is over, what will we see? Well, there, there will be an account about a conquest,
05:54   and they will present it as a conquest. They will even present the last local natives left,
05:59   who do not exactly rejoice in being Islamized. They will present them a bit as natives,
06:03   with little weird feather headdresses, who didn’t really understand the geniality
06:06   of the shift of civilization and of placing themselves under the guidance of another.
06:09   These will be the new colonized people of history. I would like to point out that
06:12   these steps are quickly being chained one to another, today.
06:15   And sometimes they get mixed up with each other. But we observe it in all Western countries.
06:19   Today, I think the step we have taken is that the institutions of the regime, of the state,
06:23   turn against the welcoming population, the welcoming society,
06:27   to force them to accept massive immigration and multiculturalism
06:31   by prohibiting demonstrations, by prohibiting speeches,
06:34   by imposing a distribution of immigrants on the population
06:37   against the will of the population. We are actually, in historical terms,
06:41   at the stage of the repression of the welcoming society. So such is our historical situation.
06:45   We need to be lucid, rather than wearing rose-colored glasses whenever we look at reality.