For God’s Sake, Listen to Him!

Below is an excerpt from a speech given by Russian President Vladimir Putin last month at the Valdai International Discussion Club. Regardless of what one thinks of Russia or Mr. Putin, his words are apropos and well worth listening to.

Many thanks to Oz-Rita for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

A relevant comment posted at Vlad’s place:

Well, he ought to know. Vladimir Putin used to be the head of the KGB, didn’t he? I’ll bet he knows exactly how Western civilization got so ****ed up, doesn’t he, and I’ll bet he even knows the names of the KGB agents who did it to us. I’ll bet he knows exactly how guys like Howard Zinn and Norman Finkelstein and Gloria Steinem and Noam Chomsky got to be so such household names in the very countries they worked so tirelessly to undermine.

But, in a funny way, doesn’t that make listening to what he says to his own people all that much more germane? Who, but one of the guys who created this politically correct nightmare would know how dangerous it is and how much it should be avoided? He’s telling his own people not to eat the poison meat that he personally put out for the enemy the night before. For God’s sake, listen to him!

Transcript:

Continue reading

Gates of Vienna News Feed 10/27/2013

While visiting Kosovo, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan proclaimed, “Kosovo is Turkey and Turkey is Kosovo,” provoking an angry response from Serbia. The Turkish foreign minister told reporters that Mr. Erdogan’s words had been misunderstood, but Serbia was not mollified. The Serbian president says Serbia will pull out of further talks with Turkey on Balkan issues.

In other news, two French Femen activists got close to Marine LePen, the leader of the Front National, and then stripped to the waist while shouting slogans at Ms. LePen. The same slogans were also written on their bare chests.

To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.

Thanks to C. Cantoni, Fjordman, Insubria, JD, LS, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

Continue reading

The Dangers of the OIC “Islamophobia” Campaign

Over the past few months there has been a lot of discussion in this space about the intensified campaign against “Islamophobia”, which is being orchestrated by the Organization for Islamic Cooperation and promoted through various trans-national bodies by Islamic groups and their allies among left-wing NGOs. The International Civil Liberties Alliance (ICLA) is spearheading the pushback against the term “Islamophobia”, which is now being used in legal action against politically-chosen targets without ever being properly defined.

Below is a press release issued today by ICLA highlighting the dangers of the OIC’s Islamophobia campaign, and summarizing the counter-initiatives against it:

The dangers of the OIC “Islamophobia” campaign

ICLA notes with great concern the ongoing OIC campaign, using the pretext of “Islamophobia”, to control the media and to stifle freedom of expression, as seen recently at the OIC conference The First International Conference on Islamophobia: Law & Media, Geneva, September 2013.

While technically not a secret, the discreet “Istanbul Process”, strongly supported by the OIC, has worrisome risks and implications, as discussed by Deborah Weiss in FrontPage Magazine, October 22nd, where she concludes with the following warning:

[T]he OIC requests that the media censor their reports about Islamic terrorism, Islamic persecution of religious minorities and human rights violations committed in the name of Islam, as an interim step toward the criminalization of such speech. All of this will only serve to increase, not decrease “Islamophobia.”

Quite surprisingly, the Istanbul Process is accepted and even endorsed by the US State Department, as outline by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in her speech to OIC, September 15th 2011. Former CIA officer Clare M. Lopez has analyzed the implications of this in the article Islamic World Tells Clinton: Defamation of Islam Must be Prevented — in America.

This campaign against “Islamophobia” is part of the OIC’s ten-year plan to put an end to criticism of Islam and any activity that may show Islam in a bad light. Already in 2008, the OIC plan was analyzed in detail at Gates of Vienna, The OIC’s Crusade Against Islamophobia.

Continue reading

The Twilight Zone of King Barry the First

Our Israeli correspondent MC has some thoughts about the current occupant of the White Palace House and the country he purports to rule.

The Twilight Zone of King Barry the First
by MC

Now the day is over.
Night is drawing nigh.
Shadows of darkening tyranny
Steal across the sky.

It is twilight, but the curtains are pulled and the light is burning bright. We sit clustered around a 42-inch panel that flickers with bright colours and emits soothing noises.

In the gathering dusk the forces of perpetual darkness are gathering, openly and unchallenged. It is not our job to challenge them; that is somebody else’s job.

The 42-inch panel continues to send its subliminal messages: All is well, all is calm, all is bright, the President is in control, all is well, all is calm all is bright.

The law of the land is based upon the Constitution, the Constitution that limits the power of government to transform itself into a tyranny.

But the Constitution has a weak point, which those stalwart fathers of the Republic could not foresee: they could not imagine that technology could continue to the point where We the People would pay homage only to a 42-inch panel. In their day, everyone was up to date; the men all wore powdered wigs. Mass mind control at the end of remote beam was totally beyond their ken.

“Knowing the power of panels to control the minds of the people; States shall let neither political party or politicians, religious groups or quasi-legal entities have access to, or control of, the transmission of media to panel systems without a clear and open statement of mind-control objectives.” (Proposal for new amendment to the Constitution).

The amendment was thrown out by the Blue Party, citing that each panel has an off button, and that the people are well qualified to use it. We (the Blue Party) are a pro-choice party: people should be free to live life as they choose.

Continue reading

Gates of Vienna News Feed 10/26/2013

When Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan attended the opening ceremony at a new shopping mall in Ankara, the lingerie outlet Victoria’s Secret lowered its shutters so its displays could not be seen from outside. The store’s manager insisted that the shuttering was not due to the visit from the Islamist prime minister, but because renovations in the store were not yet complete.

In other news, according to Der Spiegel, the NSA has been tapping Chancellor Angela Merkel’s phone since 2002.

To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.

Thanks to C. Cantoni, Fjordman, Insubria, JD, Jerry Gordon, Kitman, Steen, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

Continue reading

Shoeless in Detroit

American readers of certain age — and with a predilection for baseball lore — will remember the legendary Shoeless Joe Jackson, whose spectacular career was ended by the Black Sox scandal in 1919.

Shoeless Joe played for Chicago, but the following story about Shoeless Abdul and Shoeless Mahmoud comes from Detroit. It concerns what is currently the most pressing issue of public safety in the Motor City: the theft of shoes.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading and annotating this video:

The Pogo Project, Part 3

Things have been so hectic for the past three months that the Pogo Project was put on hold for a while. But today is relatively calm, so what better time for a Pogo strip than a Saturday evening?

The following four panels are taken from The Pogo Papers, the third volume of collected daily strips, covering 1952-53. The context for the action is the well-known tendency of Albert to sponge off the generosity of Pogo, especially where food is concerned:

Previously: Part 1, Part 2.

Chem Lab Capers in Saskatchewan

Another day, another incident of workplace violence. In this case, the workplace was a university chemistry lab, and the violence was fortuitously averted.

As part of their celebration of diversity, Western universities and technical schools welcome foreign students with open arms. The culture-enrichers are invited to attend our educational institutions, where they learn how to fly planes, build electronic devices, and concoct dangerous chemical compounds.

The University of Saskatchewan is just the latest such establishment to face the consequences of all this indiscriminate diversity. Vlad Tepes reports on an email sent out by university administrators to students and faculty concerning an unfortunate incident with a Mohammed Coefficient of 100%:

Wednesday’s precautionary sweep by hazmat officials, of an engineering chemistry lab, was prompted by a student who threatened the potential use of dangerous chemicals. This student was arrested after a search of his home revealed chemicals stolen from the university. He has been charged with theft and remains in police custody pending a court appearance today.

The student’s name is Mohamadmahdi Kowsari. A photograph is attached.

Out of concern for the safety of our community, the president has suspended this student and banned him from the University of Saskatchewan. Any sighting or knowledge of this student on campus property should be reported to Saskatoon Police Service or Protective Services immediately.

This incident is a reminder that our campus is home to many hazardous materials because of the nature of the work that we do. Day to day, these are handled under strict adherence to safety standards and procedures. We must continue this diligence in our handling of such materials and never hesitate to report concerns or unusual activity.

Visit Vlad’s place for the photo and more information.

If it weren’t for the name, recipients of this message might never have guessed that JIM was involved in the incident. It’s standard operating procedure not to release any information that might point to the role of Islamic ideology in an attempted terrorist attack. I’m surprised they even revealed the young man’s name.

If we lived in a sane world, such matters could be openly discussed. But we don’t live in a sane world.

It’s hard to calculate the disproportionate involvement of Islam in successful or attempted terrorist attacks, since the collecting of such statistics is deprecated (and often fudged). But let’s make a conservative estimate, and assume that 80% of planned or executed terrorist incidents are devised by Muslims. Then we’ll be generous, and assume that 4% of the North American population is Muslim. This means that Muslims are twenty times more likely to commit an act of terrorism than any other religious group.

It’s commonly asserted that “Islam has nothing to do with terrorism.” To disprove this fallacy, you don’t have to demonstrate that the terrorists are correct in their understanding of Islam. You don’t have to analyze their ideology or understand the way their minds work. All you have to do is look at the statistics.

Continue reading

Gates of Vienna News Feed 10/25/2013

The manager of a fast food restaurant in Germany took eleven people hostage and held them captive for fourteen hours inside the restaurant before releasing them and being arrested. The hostage-taker, an immigrant of Kurdish origin, was reportedly concerned about his legal troubles due to various narcotics violations. The hostages were all friends or family members.

In other news, Bulgaria is planning to build a wall along its border with Turkey to keep out illegal immigrants.

To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.

Thanks to Caroline Glick, Fjordman, Insubria, JD, Jerry Gordon, Steen, Vlad Tepes, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

Continue reading

Tommy Robinson on RT

Tommy Robinson, the former leader of the English Defence League, was interviewed on Russia Today this morning by Sophie Shevarnadze. Tommy talks about his reasons for leaving the EDL, his fight against Islamic fundamentalism, and his plans for moving his message into the mainstream.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this clip. Note: Vlad didn’t edit this video, so the two halves of interview are separated by commercials and promotions:

A full transcript is available here.

Previous posts about Tommy Robinson, Kevin Carroll, and the Quilliam Foundation:

Continue reading

Fear and Loathing in Sweden

“The Internet is a tool for the bad guys and their ideas.”

The following pieces about the suppression of civil liberties in Sweden all have one thread in common: the far-left organization Expo.

Fjordman sends the following introduction about the history and political affiliations of Expo:

The organization Expo is — unfortunately — very powerful in Sweden today. It was founded in the mid-1990s by the now-late Marxist activist Stieg Larsson. He ironically went on to sell tens of millions of books of crime fiction after his death.

In 2007 Mona Sahlin was elected leader of the Social Democratic Party, which has been Sweden’s largest party for generations and often its dominant political force. She stepped down as party leader after losing the 2010 elections, when she was the left-wing candidate for Prime Minister.

In 2011, after having been a serious candidate for Prime Minister only a few months earlier, Sahlin joined the board of the organization Expo.

The journalist and dissident writer Ingrid Carlqvist is currently co-editor of the newspaper Dispatch International, along with the author and historian Lars Hedegaard. They have documented how Expo came to have a very powerful unofficial influence over the Swedish public debate on immigration, or the total lack of such. Sweden is nearly paralyzed by a climate of fear. You risk being fired from your job and socially demonized by the left-leaning press if you say anything remotely critical of mass immigration. As a matter of fact, you risk being fired without saying anything at all in public. It can be enough merely to give a small donation as a private citizen to democratic dissident websites such as Avpixlat.

Expo has contributed negatively to this totalitarian climate. Some of its harshest critics have even compared it to Stasi, the secret police in the Communist dictatorship of East Germany (DDR). The few who dare speak up against mass immigration in Sweden risk being physically attacked as well. Expo has been accused of having too close a relationship with violent left-wing organizations.

The leading Expo member Charles Westin was in 2007 editor of a book about alleged right-wing extremists. In addition to contributions by radical left-wing academics such as Mattias Gardell, it further contained a chapter written by the extremely violent left-wing organization Anti-Fascist Action (AFA).

AFA have for years staged very violent attacks on people who dare to question mass immigration or oppose Islamization. Some of their victims have been attacked with axes even in their private homes. AFA often post videos on the Internet where they brag about such attacks. They have done this with near-impunity for many years. The political establishment looks the other way.

Among AFA’s many targets have been members of the perfectly democratic and legitimate political party Sverigedemokraterna (The Sweden Democrats) These attacks have continued even after the Sweden Democrats entered the Swedish Parliament in 2010. Expo’s notable board member Daniel Poohl, who is not democratically elected, has publicly stated that it’s “not undemocratic” to deny the Sweden Democrats access to political influence.

In early 2011Mona Sahlin went directly from being the national leader of the very powerful Swedish Social Democratic Party to sitting on the board of Expo together with Charles Westin. That a leading politician sits on the board with a person who has cooperated openly with groups beating up members of a legal opposition party might have raised a few eyebrows elsewhere, but not in Sweden.

[See also: Fjordman on Expo here and here.]

Thoralf Alfsson is a member of parliament for Sverigedemokraterna from Kalmar. On Tuesday he wrote wrote the following post in his blog about how he has come to live in fear, as have many other Swedes who hold politically incorrect opinions. Mr. Alfsson identifies a particular trigger for the onset of his fear: Expo.

Our Swedish correspondent LN has translated Mr. Alfsson’s post, and follows it up with related material about the official and semi-official crusade against “hate” on the internet:

I’m Afraid

Every time the phone rings and the display shows the hidden number, I feel a great discomfort and a strong sense of unease, but I still almost always answer it. In nine cases out of ten, it is a journalist calls, or Expo.

Yesterday a person from Expo called. My discomfort and malaise is not lessened by the fact that it was someone from Expo — in actuality, one becomes only more uneasy and anxious. I know that he is no kind man, but someone who dislikes me, maybe even hates me and does not wish me well. He is not objective and has no honest purpose in calling, but is just looking to get a quote he can use to hurt me politically! In other words, a person from the Expo just want to hurts me by damaging my reputation and defaming me within legal limits. That is the stark and bitter truth! Therefore I never answer his questions but just say that I have no comment, and then the call is over for me, but it is never respected and he continues nagging, and I finally get to hang up with the knowledge that one will soon get to read something less nice on their hateful website.

An Expo employee is never objective, but has an agenda that seeks to harm me and my party. This process also spills over to my children and other relatives and friends who are indirectly affected. These items will attract further various “hilarious” people who do not hesitate to engage in such actions as unlawful threats.

Expo’s staff has all the politically correct media corps behind them who happily pick Expo’s twisted creations for their own newsrooms. Aftonbladet and Expressen have their own hacks rooting around, and come with their own interpretations of the same material that can also be spiced up with various errors. Here is no serious and honest journalism, but this applies double standards and practices. One rule applies to 7-clover* politicians and quite another to the Sweden Democrats.

Moreover, not only the politically correct media corps are cheering on Expo; numerous members of parliament from the 7-clover alliance, artists, celebrities, top union figures and even the Swedish Church also support the Expo’s personal persecution. Stigmatizing is just the beginning word for what is going on in Sweden.

I also think it’s very cowardly to call from a hidden number! Not daring to stand for something is just pathetic and a sign of weakness. Not to show who you are when you call is pure cowardice.

Starting today, I stop answering calls from a hidden number!

Last Sunday, I wrote a blog post about Islam Net in Norway. On several occasions Expo has identified myself and others as Islamophobes. It is documented! The first time I ended up as such, it was not only me on Expo’s list of Islamophobes, but also the journalist Kurt Lundgren, who became angry. Read the article from Ölandsbladet.

Continue reading

Gates of Vienna News Feed 10/24/2013

Anti-government protesters in Tunis chased an Al Jazeera TV crew out of Kasbah Square today. The protesters were angry over what they consider biased coverage by Al Jazeera, which they see as supportive of Tunisia’s Salafist government.

In other news, pirates attacked an oil supply ship off the coast of Nigeria and kidnapped two of its officers, both of them Americans.

To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.

Thanks to C. Cantoni, Fjordman, Insubria, JD, Nick, Winds of Jihad, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

Continue reading

Fear is a Bad Advisor

As reported here previously, the website Politically Incorrect and the political party Die Freiheit are being targeted and persecuted by the state government of Bavaria.

Yesterday a couple of Muslims did the dirty work for the Bavarian government and attacked Die Freiheit leader Michael Stürzenberger on the street. One of them punched him in the eye and broke his glasses.

Below is an interview with Mr. Stürzenberger recorded immediately after the assault. Many thanks to Oz-Rita for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Winds of Jihad posted a report based on the account in Politically Incorrect:

Munich: Michael Stürzenberger Attacked by Turkish Muselmaniac

Munich: During yesterday’s rally at Munich’s Rotkreuzplatz Michael Stürzenberger, the most courageous man in Europe, again involved passers-by in intensive discussions about the many anti-constitutional commands of the Koran. A Muselmaniac denied it, as usual, until he was shown the original Arabic Quran from Saudi Arabia. He grabbed it and wanted to run off with it. Suddenly, another Muslim from the back rushed up fast and hit the national chairman of the BAVARIAN FREEDOM PARTY in the face with his fist. Stürzenberger’s glasses shattered into three pieces and flew to the ground. He was bleeding from a cut below the eye. Four police officers pounced on the Turkish Muslim, threw him to the ground and held him there. Photos or film footage of the attack are unavailable, unfortunately, because the local council of the city of Munich has forbidden the FREEDOM PARTY to film or photograph counter-demonstrators. Clearly the City Council has a vested interest to prevent that the general public will be alerted to how aggressive and violent Muslims and left-wing extremists are in Munich. Some Lefties were gloating happily about the attack, applauded and laughed. [more from PI in German] . The German text is below the fold!…

Video transcript:

Continue reading

The Menacing System of “European Values”

From Hammerfest on the Barents Sea to Lampedusa in the Mediterranean, from Stornoway in the Outer Hebrides to Skyros in the Aegean, an “Iron Curtain” of oppression has descended across the European continent. Within that line lie all the capitals of the ancient states of Western Europe. Dublin, London, Copenhagen, Oslo, Stockholm, Helsinki, Paris, Amsterdam, Berlin, Vienna, Rome, Madrid, and Lisbon: all these famous cities and the populations around them lie in what I must call the EUSSR sphere, and all are subject, in one form or another, not only to totalitarian influence but to a very high and in some cases increasing measure of control from Brussels.

So might Sir Winston Churchill have written about the increasing suppression of free speech in Europe, if he were alive today.

Whether the impetus comes from Resolution 16/18 of United Nations Human Rights Council, a “broader interpretation” of Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, or the internal rulings of the European Commission, the current momentum in the European Union is towards an ever-tighter stranglehold on the civil liberties of European citizens — with a particular emphasis on “religious intolerance”, needless to say.

JLH has translated an excellent op-ed by the Austrian writer Andreas Unterberger about the new fascism that is now unfolding in the European Union. The translator includes the following introductory note:

I am reminded of my first year translating for Gates of Vienna, when I encountered constant evocations of the Enlightenment. I understood them, to be sure, but I was not used to such frequent references. It reminded me that our Founders were Enlightened men, and that forgetting that is to think of ourselves in isolation instead of as the culmination of a long process.

And we are in danger of once again following the lead of Europe, but this time to our detriment and to the ultimate destruction of what we are pleased to call “American exceptionalism.” What for so long has separated us from ever-present totalitarian thinking is now worn to a thin veneer of lip-service. Whether the ultimate Orwellian gloom will be tinged red with the blood of the gulags or the blood of jihad will probably not matter to the victims in the coming generations.

The translated essay from Andreas Unterberger’s blog:

A Union Destroys Its Values

by Andreas Unterberger
October 21, 2013

Penalties for those parties that do not represent the values of the EU! This demand by European Socialists is finding wide agreement in the EU Commission. One thing is clear, however. Should Europe really introduce such penalties, it will ultimately leave the path of constitutional statehood, for that state builds upon ideological neutrality, as it has been embodied quite value-free in the Austrian constitution for almost a hundred years. The moment this neutrality is abandoned, all doors are thrown open to a new totalitarianism.

This move in the direction of criminalization is so much riskier, since there are groups in the EU parliament who style themselves “liberal,” to be sure, but actually have great sympathy for such ideas of value control.

Any criminalization of opinions and values is a severe blow to the real, fundamental, liberal principles of the Enlightenment and all of the consequent revolutions and constitutions. The greatest demand of the Enlightenment was its call for freedom of expression. In Voltaire’s formulation: Even if I completely reject the content of what someone says, I shall (as a freedom-loving individual as well as a constitutional state) do all I can to allow him to broadcast that content. Freedom of expression only for those who think the same as we do is nothing but a caricature.

Nazis and Communists Also Protected Their Value Systems

To emphasize the necessity of genuine freedom of expression, think of the history of the last couple of centuries, when there was no freedom of expression. In the era of Maria Theresa, even going to mass was monitored. In the Nazi era, it was compulsory to support the Nazis’ nationalistic, anti-Semitic and racist “values.” Then, until 1989, half of Europe had to have the “values” of class warfare and the exploitative build-up of socialist societies. In truth, regimes were protecting their own power.

Now there is the menacing system of “European values.” Already several verdicts in the highest European courts (in Luxembourg as in Strasbourg) have been shaped in the spirit of a power elite who wish to compel politically correct thinking and speaking at the cost of freedom of expression. In the future, politics (or at least a part of the political class) will once again control our very thoughts.

Continue reading