Bridges and Bastions

Autumn Fundraiser 2014, Day Five

The Löbel Bastion

The image at the top of this post (the Queensboro Bridge in 1929) is another one that I found in the New York City Municipal Archives when I was searching for period photos that fit the “Third Rails” theme of this week’s fundraiser. It doesn’t really have any particular relevance to what I’ll be writing about tonight, but I love the grand sweep of the perspective, the intricate architecture, and the evidence of industrious activity in the background. No land is visible, so we are tantalized by the thought of what might lie before us or behind us at either end of the bridge.

Before we get to today’s principal topic — and before I dun you all vigorously once again to donate to our blog — I need to give you a cardiovascular update on Dymphna. She and I went to the cardiologist’s office yesterday, where she had her dressing removed and her pacemaker checked. The device is functioning properly, according to the technician. The variability of her pulse rate, which is somewhat worrisome, is due to the instructions sent by the atrium, the upper chamber of the heart. Now that the pacemaker is installed, that rate is communicated to the ventricle, which beats with the same frequency and prevents “complete heart block”, which was what sent us to the emergency room two weeks ago. When the atrium slows down, the ventricle slows down, but this variability is not caused by the pacemaker. I hope to have some discussions about this problem with the cardiologist himself, when we see him at our next appointment.

The surgical implantation of the device triggered a major PTSD episode for her, and she is still trying to regain her equipoise so that she can resume normal activities, including writing. She says her distress left her with a case of writer’s block, at least until last night, which is why we hadn’t been alternating our posts this week, as is our usual practice.

Now down to business: yesterday was a special occasion. Not only was it the midpoint of our quarterly bleg, but it was also the anniversary of the founding of this blog. And it’s not just any old anniversary, but our TENTH anniversary. Ten years ago yesterday, the first post went up at Gates of Vienna.

Tip jarIt’s hard to believe that we’ve been at this Counterjihad business for a decade, but we have. It was a part-time operation for the first two years, at least for me, but since 2006 it’s been mostly full-time. A lot of strange and alarming things have happened in the interim. But here we are, still slogging away at it.

Readers are urged to make the tip jar ring with a couple of nickels — or a couple of sawbucks, or a couple of grand, or, heck, even a couple of large! — and then stick around and see what happens for the next ten years.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

Last spring I conceived the idea of collecting important articles and essays from the first ten years of Gates of Vienna and publishing them in a book. It would have to be self-published, of course, so most of the work involved would fall on my shoulders. I opened up the ancient archives and began collecting material, with the goal of having it ready to publish not too long after our tenth anniversary.

Well… it seems I was a bit overoptimistic.

A lot of events intervened between April and October. First there was the Orlando trip, and after that ISIS got going in earnest. Every week seemed to bring some urgent new project or crisis that kept Vlad and me up all hours of the night, producing the translations and videos and so on. There was never any spare time, and there still isn’t.

But I haven’t given up on the idea of the book. Some of the essays have been collected, and our major guest-essayists have given permission to have their work included.

What I’d like to see is a collection divided up into themed sections. There might be a “Multiculturalism” section, and it could include essays by Fjordman, Takuan Seiyo, and Paul Weston, among others. Scandinavia deserves its own topic, as does the UK.

Republishing any of the translated articles may be difficult, however, unless I happen to know the author of the original. Writers generally reserve rights to translations of their material.

I came up with a tentative design for the cover of the book. It’s based on a contemporary Turkish (I think) illustration of the siege of Vienna, from the vantage point of the Ottoman camp. The artist didn’t attempt to make an accurate schematic of the layout of the city walls, but since the Löbel Bastion was so crucial to the Viennese defenses, I like to think that’s what we’re seeing in the background. Those insouciant red-bearded feather-capped lance-carrying stalwarts strolling the ramparts are the Viennese garrison, hoping against hope that King Jan III Sobieski and the Polish hussars will come thundering down the Kahlenberg in time to save the city:

Continue reading

Gates of Vienna News Feed 10/9/2014

The condition of the Spanish nurse who contracted Ebola has worsened, and she now requires assistance to be able to breathe. The protective measures taken when she was admitted to the hospital were reportedly inadequate, so that several other people may have been infected with the virus, and are now isolated and being monitored. Meanwhile, some members of the hospital’s nursing are refusing to enter the room where the infected nurse is being treated, because they are skeptical of the protection measures taken. Some have even canceled their contracts to avoid it.

In other news, the Shiite Houthi rebels who have been occupying Sanaa since last month have forced the resignation of the Yemeni prime minister. Also in Sanaa, a suicide bomber detonated himself amongst Shiites on the street, killing ten people, four of them children. The incident had nothing to do with Islam.

To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.

Thanks to C. Cantoni, Diana West, DS, Fjordman, Green Infidel, Insubria, Jerry Gordon, Steen, Vlad Tepes, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

Continue reading

Will “Discriminatory” Ballot Initiatives be Banned in Switzerland?

The great and wise among the elites who govern Switzerland are unhappy with direct democracy, and disapprove of popular referenda that have “gone too far”. Needless to say, recent initiatives banning minarets and restricting minarets are among the ballot items that should never have been allowed, from their point of view.

Many thanks to JLH for translating this article from Schweiz am Sonntag:

A Controversial Plan: Higher Hurdles for Initiatives

by Alan Cassidy
October 4, 2014

The Council of States is rolling out comprehensive plans: More initiatives could be null and void

Too detailed, too rigid and problematic — Many folk initiatives go too far for the National Policy Commission of the Council of States. Now it is making controversial suggestions.

The National Policy Commission (SPK) is not exactly known as a treasure trove of revolutionary ideas. That could soon change. Its members see the state as being in peril from a piling up of folk initiatives that is harming the constitutional system. So they are now developing the basics for preventing awkward initiatives from even getting to a vote.

We now know what specific ideas the councilors are testing. They are in the report to the Economic Commission (WAK) which the SPK authored for assessment of inheritance tax initiatives. Schweiz am Sonntag has a copy. The proposals are comprehensive. If they were already operative, Parliament would have had the power to stop many referenda in recent years. They concern not only initiatives, but even their interpretation by Parliament.

The SPK intends to expand the criteria under which a referendum can be declared invalid by the Parliament. Presently, that is only possible if a referendum violates unity of form or subject matter or violates mandatory international law. Parliament has declared a referendum invalid on these grounds only four times.

This latitude is too narrow for the SPK. In accord with its recommendations, the Federal Assembly should also be able to intercede if a referendum violates other principles. Specifically, it names the discrimination ban, the principle of proportionality and the prohibition on retrospective legislation.

The first two proposals, especially, are potentially explosive, because they can be very broadly interpreted. Referenda are regularly called “disproportionate.” Is it proportional if a 22-year-old apprentice trainer who is having consensual sex with his 17-year-old girlfriend is no longer allowed to train apprentices? That is what the pedophilia referendum required, which was passed in May of this year. According to this interpretation, it would have had to be declared invalid.

The accusation that a referendum is discriminatory — according to how this is read — applies to several referenda of past years — above all, the minaret initiative of 2009. Its opponents argued in the campaign that a ban on minarets discriminates against Muslims.

The councilors are also irritated that many referenda are formulated at too great length and with too much detail. Therefore, according to the report, the SPK is thinking of “ensuring a sensible division of labor.” Referenda should be confined to “regulation of basic principles” and not be able to override Parliament’s latitude to interpret.

Continue reading

Who Will Rid Me Of This Turbulent Blond? Round Three.

I’ve dusted off the “Free Geert banner” for this post. Even though its time has not quite arrived, it looks like it will be needed soon enough, and I want to be ready for it.

More than three years after its last attempt, the Dutch government is ready to have another go at Geert Wilders. Since the Netherlands is a modern, advanced, enlightened democracy, the police can’t just roust him out of bed in the middle of the night and hustle him in off to the Lubyanka in a Black Maria for a quick neck shot in the cellars.

No, they have to go through the correct legal forms. First they have to find a proper charge — in this case, “insulting a population group with respect to their race and of incitement to discrimination and hatred”. Then they have to round up all the usual witnesses, both lefties and enrichers, to affirm how hateful the defendant is. Then they convict him, and even if he doesn’t get thrown in the slammer with all those peaceful Moroccan criminals, his political career will be kaput.

Or such is the plan. But this will be the third such show trial, and the first two didn’t work out quite the way the nomenklatura planned: Mr. Wilders mounted a smart, effective defense, and was acquitted.

We’ll see what happens this time. But it looks like Round Three is coming up.

The PVV sent out the following brief notice this morning:

Wilders: Scandalous decision of the Public Prosecutor

PVV leader Geert Wilders finds it incomprehensible that the Public Prosecutor has identified him as a suspect.

Wilders: “It is a scandal. While the world is on fire, the Public Prosecutor is targeting a Member of Parliament who draws attention to the problems. It would be better if the Public Prosecutor spend more time focusing on Dutch jihadists who leave for Syria. More than three quarters of them are Moroccans. This decision is absurd.”

And here’s the report from Dutch News:

Geert Wilders is a Formal ‘Suspect’ For Anti-Moroccan Chants

Public prosecutors have ‘invited’ PVV leader Geert Wilders for questioning in connection with remarks he made about Moroccans last year and consider him to be a formal suspect, the department said on Thursday.

The department said in a statement Wilders is ‘suspected of having insulted a population group with respect to their race and of incitement to discrimination and hatred’.

A longer article appeared in The Appeal-Democrat:

Continue reading

Gates of Vienna News Feed 10/8/2014

Canadian authorities have thwarted a planned series of attacks by extremists, who intended to carry out extreme acts against American and Canadian targets in Canada. The intended extremism was fortunately only in the “aspirational” stage. In any case, it had nothing to do with Islam.

In other news, forces of the Islamic State were pushed back by Kurdish fighters from the Syrian town of Kobani, on the border with Turkey. Meanwhile, violent protests broke out across Turkey, with fighting between supporters and opponents of ISIS. At least eighteen people were killed in the clashes.

To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.

Thanks to C. Cantoni, Fjordman, Insubria, Vlad Tepes, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

Continue reading

An Open Letter to German Muslims

Many thanks to JLH for translating this excellent piece by Henryk Broder from Die Welt:

An Open Letter

It’s nice that Muslims have protested against the Islamic State. But the distinction between Islam and Islamism is often hairsplitting. Sometimes, they are two sides of the same coin.


Sept. 19, 2014: More than a thousand Muslims demonstrated in Berlin-Kreuzberg against racism, xenophobia and extremism with a public prayer for peace.

Dear Muslim Fellow Citizens…

by Henryk M. Broder, September 23, 2014

Dear Muslim Fellow Citizens and Descendants of the Prophet Mohammed,

I don’t know if that is the right form of address. It seems a bit awkward. I am inclined to say, Dear Musulmen and Musulwomen, but that, I fear would be politically incorrect And I don’t want to insult anyone. Especially since we have something in common. I too am a citizen with an immigrant background. I was eleven and spoke no German art all, when my parents left Poland and traveled to Cologne by way of Vienna. Cologne, of all places. At any rate, Kattowitz, where we came from, was even uglier.

When I look back today, I can only say that I had a crummy childhood. Not because of the “Welcoming Culture” that emanated from Colognese and Carnival, but because of my parents. They had survived the Nazi era, but their souls had stopped dead in their tracks. Our home was a purgatory of remembrances. Nonetheless, I never had the urge to blow myself up or join a terrorist group. Even though all l wanted was just one thing — to get out of this never-ending misery.

Life had something to offer — even in Cologne. Maastricht was just around the corner, Amsterdam was only three hours away. I am just saying that to make it clear that I wasn’t born on a yacht with a golden Visa card in my hand. So much for me. Now for you.

Deeds Cannot Be Separated From the Doers

I thought it was good that you “set an example” last Friday and demonstrated against racism, fanaticism and barbarism, which, as all speakers unanimously confirmed, has nothing to do with “true Islam.” You distanced yourselves from the crimes that were committed “in the name of Islam.” Anyway, I was overcome by a sensation of déja vu. Where had I heard this formulation before?

Oh, right! At the memorial ceremony for the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp, and for the day of the book-burning, and on every November 9th recalling “Reichskristallnacht,” and at all the state visits of German presidents in Poland, France and Greece where they ask forgiveness for crimes committed “in Germany’s name.”

And every time, I wondered, how was it possible to lay waste half of Europe, kill millions of people and still separate the doers from the deeds? Had the Germans authorized some sub-contractor — some Ltd. — to fetch Austria home to the Reich, to attack Poland, to level Rotterdam and Coventry, while they themselves were off rambling — with Strength through Joy — on Rügen and in the Bavarian Forest?

And today, I wonder, how can crimes be committed “in the name of Islam” and have nothing to do with Islam and not reflect on Islam?

Continue reading

Same Goal, Different Tactics

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the newly-minted Caliph of the Islamic State, and John Esposito, a professor at Georgetown University, have something in common: each has a doctorate in Islamic Studies.

They differ on some minor theological details, however. Mr. Baghdadi finds in Islam the scriptural justification for beheading and enslaving infidels, the violent suppression of religious minorities, and the propagation of Islam through aggressive warfare. Mr. Esposito, in contrast, sees Islam as a religion of peace.

Who is right?

Up until now, Professor Esposito could usually trump his critics with his certified scholastic expertise on Islam. Unfortunately, he can’t out-credential the Caliph. Yet somehow we are supposed to believe him, the renowned professor of Islamic Studies, and ignore that black-turbaned man over there behind the curtain.

Oleg Atbashian of The People’s Cube discusses this topic at FrontPage Mag in an article about the opening of the Center for Global Islamic Studies at the University of Florida in Gainesville. Some excerpts are below:

Centers for Islamic Studies: a Cold-War-Style Influence Operation?

by Oleg Atbashian

The launch of a new Center for Global Islamic Studies at the extremely leftist University of Florida in Gainesville may have been planned as a purely academic affair, but the announcements in the local and national media, including AP and Fox News, exhibited more than a purely academic interest in this event. To compare, one doesn’t often see national media announcements about, let’s say, a local center for the study of viruses — unless the virus is Ebola. And just like with any news about Ebola studies, any news about studies of Islam attracts attention from the general public, who want to know if there’s a hope for the cure, containment, and safety from danger.

Unfortunately, these may not be the kind of Islamic Studies that answer those hopes. The Center opened on September 18th with a conference on “Global Islam and the Quest for Public Space,” headlined by none other than Georgetown professor John Esposito, a known apologist for radical Islam and founding director of the Saudi-sponsored Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding in the Walsh School of Foreign Service.

A small group of protesters picketed the event outside the Pugh Hall on the university campus, with a dozen creative posters and a vinyl banner pointing out that John Esposito and the leader of ISIS both hold PhDs in Islamic Studies: “Same goal, different tactics.” The video of the protest can be seen online.

The protest organizer, Randy McDaniels of ACT for America and the Counter-Terrorism Advisory Group, stated that our students certainly need to study Islam, as long as such studies are based on scientific objectivity and critical analysis. But the presence of John Esposito as the keynote speaker indicated that the new Global Islamic Studies Center was likely to go the way of many other universities, opening their doors and exposing our children to political Islam under the guise of education, with programs funded by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other state sponsors of Islamic fundamentalism.

Continue reading

Spreading the News

Autumn Fundraiser 2014, Day Three

The photo at the top of this post shows the corner of Sixth Avenue and 40th Street in New York in May of 1940. The man on the right is reading a newspaper with the headline: “NAZI ARMY NOW 75 MILES FROM PARIS”.

Boy, those were different times, eh? And not just because the poets studied rules of verse (while all the ladies rolled their eyes). A jumbo malted milk could be had for a nickel, and breakfast with coffee for a dime. A good (Cuban!) cigar cost a quarter. The streets of Manhattan seethed with commerce while Europe seethed with war.

Tip jar“But Baron,” you object, “what does all this have to do with the third day of your autumn fundraiser?”

Well. Not all that much, really. When I was searching for relevant illustrations for this week’s “Third Rails” theme, I stumbled across the New York City Municipal Archives, which proved to be a treasure trove of period photographs of the Big Apple. That’s where this excellent image came from.

However, in a way the scene on Sixth Avenue does bear on this week’s topic. The newspaper the fellow is reading didn’t reassure him that “the war in France has nothing to do with Nazism.” It didn’t inform him that the majority of Germans were peaceful, nor that the Blitzkrieg was the work of a tiny minority of extremists. Secretary of State Cordell Hull did not call for “dialogue” between the Germans and the French as a way of resolving their differences, or suggest that President Albert François Lebrun offer Adolf Hitler “land for peace”.

Yes, those were different times.

That was then, and this is now. Nowadays the major news outlets do not consider factual reporting to be a significant part of their mission statement. Above all else they peddle the “narrative”, however that happens to be defined by the cognoscenti at any given moment. If a few facts happen to trickle through during the process, that’s an added bonus. But it’s not the point of the enterprise.

That’s why we need alternate channels for the flow of information, which is where Gates of Vienna comes in.

However, if Dymphna and I were the only ones involved, pounding away at our keyboards here at Schloss Bodissey and passing on tidbits of information to our readers, there wouldn’t be much reason for you all to give up your hard-won dollars, pounds, euros, zlotys, and kroner to support what we do.

Continue reading

Gates of Vienna News Feed 10/7/2014

Illegal migrants staying at the makeshift camp near Calais are complaining about the blandness of the food being given to them. A charitable organization that handed out meals to the asylum seekers had to cease operations after residents of the camp refused to eat their food, because it was not spicy enough.

In other news, Israel responded to an attack that wounded several of its soldiers by shelling the part of Lebanon where the attack originated. Hezbollah have claimed responsibility for the attack, which occurred near Shebaa Farms in the Golan Heights. The incident had nothing to do with Islam.

To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.

Thanks to C. Cantoni, Caroline Glick, Fjordman, Insubria, Jerry Gordon, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

Continue reading

ISIS in the Sinai

The Islamic State is popping up all over the place these days. In addition to their usual haunts in Iraq and Syria (they took Kobani today, despite massive air attacks by the United States and its allies), their adherents (or admirers) have been reported in Finland, London, Chicago, and Kosovo. And that’s just from today’s batch of news articles.

In Libya, the Salafist militia Ansar al-Sharia has pledged allegiance to the Caliph. There are also reports that ISIS has a presence in the West Bank.

A couple of days ago an ISIS affiliate from the Sinai released a video bragging about its violent actions against “Zionist agents” and warning the tribes of the region to conform to the dictates of the Caliph. The video is too graphic to remain on YouTube, but as of this writing it is still available on (CAUTION! Extreme violence at this link!) Dailymotion.

If you have the stomach to watch it, you’ll see some of the usual stuff — inspiring jihad songs in mujaharmony, blowing up buildings, the shooting and/or beheading of bad people who have done wrong in the eyes of Allah, etc. Most of the middle of the video is taken up by captives speaking earnestly into the camera. Some of them must surely be handcuffed, because you can see flies walk across their faces, and they shake their heads, rather than brush the insects away.

Portions of this video may eventually be subtitled. In the meantime, the following summary was written by ritamalik, who understands written Arabic, and some of the more standard spoken dialects of Arabic:

The video opens with Quran 5:51: “O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are [in fact] allies of one another. And whoever is an ally to them among you — then indeed, he is [one] of them. Indeed, Allah guides not the wrongdoing people.”

Then there is the beheading scene when the guy shouts that this is the punishment for all the apostate traitors. Takbir!

Then comes the voice of (I think) Khalifa Al-Baghdadi or someone like that, who gives a message to the people of Egypt in general and those of the Sinai in particular. That ISIS has been seeing a succession of treachery from them and how every day they discover a string of plots and conspiracies by them against Islam and the Muslims. Then he goes on to warn them about a group called “The Supporters of Beit Al Maghdas (Jerusalem)”, many of whom had turned out to be spies for the Jews. Then he denounces the Egyptian Army for killing the Mujahideen (ISIS fighters), and says that the Egyptians are fighting for the Jews and blockade the people of Gaza. And then says that Allah most high says that who ever makes friends with them (the Kuffar that is) is one of them! Therefore, he says, it is a religious duty to all of us (Muslims) to stand up to them. Then he quotes some more of the Quran about how God hates the Kuffar, who deny his light and so on.

Then the video shows an attack on the house of an Egyptian, a supposed traitor. The caption gives the name and age of the man and the accusation, which is belonging to the apostate Egyptian army and participation in many of their operations which caused the destruction and burning of Muslims’ houses and so on. Then it reads that the punishment should be the same as his crime. His blood is blood of a dog and he is wanted dead or alive.

Then the voice again says that they should attack their houses and explode their abodes and cut their heads off and fill their world with fear. Then he recites a part of Quran about Noah which says that God told Noah that his family who have done mischief are not of him anymore, and he should not consider them family (obvious parallels with Egyptian army members not being considered part of the Ummah anymore). Then the video shows the house of the poor chap being exploded, and the caption thanks god for the destruction of the house of the “apostate”.

Then comes a confession video. The guy is a soldier of the Egyptian army. I couldn’t understand a word that this poor guy had to say since he was speaking in some strange dialect. But the caption reads that he was a spy for the Jews. Then of course it shows the end to which he came later. He was shot in the head. The captain reads: “What is the harm in repenting before you are forced?”

Continue reading

Do Not Talk To The Motormen

Autumn Fundraiser 2014, Day Two

What Cannot Be Said

The theme of this week’s fundraising effort is “Third Rails”.

The chosen topic helps explain why we have to beg money from readers to cover our operating expenses. The untouchable aspect of our core mission and its various satellite issues guarantees that income opportunities normally available to more cautious writers remain mostly closed to us. My taking a day job to support what we do here would put Dymphna at risk, due to her precarious medical situation. So we chose this route instead.

Tip jarThe third-rail syndrome applies not just to politicians and public figures, but to anyone who speaks out where other people can hear. Virtually every topic has been politicized, and the penalties for holding the incorrect view can be severe.

There are certain things that simply cannot be said, not without the risk of being fired or arrested or losing the custody of children.

As I mentioned yesterday, the topic of race carries the heaviest baggage. Track the most heavily publicized career-ending incidents in the news: you’ll find that most of them involve white people saying Things That Cannot Be Said about persons of color. Statements by straight people about “gender issues” are now beginning to catch up, but race still leads the field.

This politically correct virus infects the entire culture, even the “Islamophobes”. A few months ago I was at an event sponsored by a Christian activist group that helps victims of religious persecution. These are good people, and they “get it” about Islam — they understand what Islamic countries do to Christians and other religious minorities. They view Islam as a dangerous totalitarian ideology. They don’t suffer from any delusions about “moderate Muslims”.

But as I was sitting there listening to them, I realized that there were certain things that no one would dare to say out loud in front of that group. Everyone in the room was white, so as a thought experiment, I imagined myself saying in a conversational manner, “You know, I really prefer the company of white people.” Fortunately, I never act on such foolish impulses. If I had, I almost certainly would have been asked to leave.

Yet a black person who an expressed a preference for his own race would not have been sanctioned. His statement wouldn’t even draw much attention. It’s racist for a white person to prefer white people, but not for blacks to feel the same about their own race. There’s no symmetry to the rules.

When the full nature of these rules is teased out and exposed to the light of day, the irrational absurdity of the whole business is plain for all to see. It must remain a Thing That Cannot Be Said, because saying it brings the reigning cultural paradigm to full consciousness, where everyone can realize just how stupid and harmful it is.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

The issue of immigration borrows its shibboleths from race, because nowadays most immigration involves poor uneducated non-whites pouring into countries that were until recently civilized and prosperous nations, and were made that way by white Europeans. Anyone who advocates the curtailment of mass immigration is therefore a “racist”, and his opinion becomes yet another Thing That Cannot Be Said.

Continue reading

Gates of Vienna News Feed 10/6/2014

According to Iranian state media, a major explosion occurred last night at the Parchin Iranian nuclear trigger test site south of Tehran. At least two people were killed, and the blast could be seen and felt up to ten miles away. There’s no word whether the incident was sabotage, or an accident. However, it’s certain that the explosion had nothing to do with Islam.

In other news, a nurse in Spain has contracted Ebola. She was on the team that treated a Spanish priest who returned to Spain from Africa after falling ill with the disease, and later died.

To see the headlines and the articles, click “Continue reading” below.

Thanks to C. Cantoni, Fjordman, Insubria, Jerry Gordon, Steen, Vlad Tepes, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Notice to tipsters: Please don’t submit extensive excerpts from articles that have been posted behind a subscription firewall, or are otherwise under copyright protection.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

Continue reading

Pakistan II: The Hudood Ordinances

This is the second part in a series about sharia in Pakistan. Part I is here.

Pakistan II: The Hudood Ordinances
“Twisting the Words of God”

by Peter

The Hudood Ordinances have been universally condemned as instruments used by the regime to oppress women and non-Muslims in Pakistan. These ordinances were passed into Pakistani law during the Presidency of Zia ul Haq to enable Sharia punishment to be imposed for theft, extramarital sex, and the consumption of alcohol. Particular condemnation has been reserved for the requirement for rape victims to produce four male witnesses to the offence, which leaves them vulnerable to prosecution themselves if they are unable to do so. According to these laws, the penalty for theft is the amputation of a hand, and for extramarital sex, death by stoning or public whipping. I’m not sure what the penalty is for the consumption of alcohol, but maybe it doesn’t matter as long as they do it in Tashkent.

These laws were welcomed at the time by hard-line Islamists, which goes a long way towards explaining why the remains of the late and unlamented General Zia ul Haq lay decomposing within the hallowed grounds of Islamabad’s Shah Faisal Mosque instead of in an ordinary cemetery with the rest of the faithful departed.

In spite of unyielding opposition from the same hard-line Islamists who welcomed the original legislation, the Ordinances were amended in 2006 by the Women’s Bill, which changed the punishment for having consensual sex outside marriage to imprisonment of up to five years plus a fine of 10,000 rupees. Rape would be punishable by 10 to 25 years of imprisonment, but with death or life imprisonment if committed by two or more persons together, while adultery would remain under the Hudood Ordinance and punishable by stoning to death. The Bill also outlaws statutory rape, i.e. sex with girls under the age of 16, but as with many things in Pakistan, persuading the police to enforce any of these laws largely depends on whether or not the accused is a Muslim.

As with Sharia, the Hudood Ordinances also discriminate against women and non-Muslims. For example, during a trial, the word of a Muslim is given more weight than that of a non-Muslim and the word of a man is given more weight than that of a woman, which explains why so many non-Muslims are being accused and convicted of blasphemy. The mere fact that they are non-Muslims leaves them vulnerable to such an accusation.

Such was the case of Gul Masih, who had been accused of blasphemy following a local dispute over a broken water pipe. The evidence was said to have been contradictory, and at best hearsay, but Gul was convicted and sentenced to death on the strength of it. The main prosecution witness was one Sajjad Hussein, of whom the judge said, “This man has a beard and the outlook of a true Muslim. I have no reason to disbelieve him.” Gul Masih was freed on appeal in 1995 and later fled to Europe after several attempts were made on his life.

The tragedy of Nageena and Ghulam Masih is another indictment of the bias and partiality of the Hudood Ordinances. Seven-year-old Nageena Masih was set upon and gang raped by four Muslim youths in her Punjabi village. The teenagers were caught in the act by Nageena’s father, Ghulam Masih, and a group of other villagers but they managed to elude capture by running across some open fields. Ghulam and his wife Shehnaz reported the incident to the police, and then took little Nageena to the nearest hospital where she was diagnosed with severe internal injuries and admitted for further examination.

In the meantime, many of the villagers had given their names to the police as witnesses and the perpetrators were arrested. In any other country but Pakistan, justice would then have taken its course, but it was not to be. The four youths were released from custody and Ghulam Masih was advised to take no further action by the local chief of police. As the victim and witnesses were Christian and the rapists were Muslim, a conviction was unlikely. However, Ghulam Masih continued to seek justice for his daughter, refusing presents and other inducements from the families of Nageena’s rapists.

Continue reading