Most readers will be familiar with the notorious inaccuracy of the PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) test for COVID-19. Depending on how many cycles are used, the PCR test can detect Corona in Dr. Pepper, or Cheez Whiz, or even in tap water.
The antigen test for COVID-19 is somewhat different. It is intended to detect antibodies that have been produced by the immune system in response to the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus.
The following article from Germany describes the inaccuracy of the antigen test, and how it is essentially as unreliable as the PCR test. It helps explains why the seasonal flu disappeared in early 2020, since the Corona tests are likely to be positive when the influenza virus is present, or even when certain bacteria are in the bloodstream.
Our governments, in their infinite wisdom, want COVID-19 to be detected in millions of patients. It seems that both the PCR and the antigen tests have been instrumental in producing the desired results.
Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Report24:
Fraud against the citizen: Antigen test also responds to flu and bacteria
Hardly any other topic is as hotly controversial as the question of where the flu, which usually occurs every year, has actually gone. The fact that the corona pandemic is identical to the flu pandemic is vehemently opposed by mainstream censorship institutes disguised as “fact-checkers”. After it became known that some PCR tests were not able to differentiate between coronavirus and influenza, evidence is now on the table that this also applies to at least one widespread antigen self-test. A gigantic fraud?
The subject is so hot that we are presenting the sources used for it a little more clearly than usual. Because we will be fought for this news again until our existence is threatened. Nonetheless, it is true, documented and verifiable for every citizen on the basis of our documents. We ask you to study this information carefully and disseminate it.
Current antigen tests for Germany
While researching antigen tests that are currently being delivered from China via Linz-Hörsching Airport to Germany, we came across a document from the European Commission. There are listed which viruses are recognized by these antigen self-tests used mainly in schools:
- Adenovirus
- Adenovirus 3
- Alpha Coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E)
- Alpha Coronavirus Nl63 (HCoV-Nl63)
- Beta Coronavirus HKU1 (HCoV-HKU1)
- Beta Coronavirus OC43 (HCoV-OC43)
- Influenza A H1N1
- Influenza A H3N2
- Influenza A H5N1
- Influenza B Victoria
- Influenza B Yamagata
- MERS-CoV
- Mumps Virus (MuV)
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis
- Mycoplasma Pneumoniae
- Parainfluenza Virus Type
- Parainfluenza Virus Type 2
- Respiratory Syncytial V (RSV)
- Rhinovirus
- SARS-CoV
Source: Properties of the COVID-19 Antigen Detection Kit from New Gene (Hangzhou) Bioengineering Co., Ltd, China, official website of the EU Commission / European Union Manufacturers’[ website.
This is unlikely to be the only approved test in use that, in addition to SARS-CoV-2, also responds to influenza and other pathogens (Example 1, Example2, Example3).
Influenza positives are therefore included in “Corona infection numbers”
The question arises as to what sense such a product makes if it is quite obvious that the entire range of known flu viruses can be detected with it. Because the result of the tests, according to the advertisement, is always “C-positive”, i.e. a positive test for coronaviruses. The fact that this is exclusively a Corona test is falsely suggested by a corresponding imprint on all of these products. As is well known, it is also noted and incorporated into the daily published infection figures. If a citizen who tested positive by antigen test does a PCR test to be sure, he is known to be included twice in the statistics — and every further PCR test, whether positive or negative, as well.
It is really difficult not to think of fraud on a gigantic scale here — which official body will answer questions about it? Which mainstream medium has the courage to ask as well?
Only very few mutation lines are recognized in SARS-CoV-2
What informative value do such antigen self-tests have if they detect not only SARS-CoV-2 but dozens of other pathogens, but with SARS-CoV-2 they are also limited to very few mutation lines?
In fact, the manufacturer states that in the case of SARS-CoV-2, only the following lines are recognized out of the hundreds of strains in circulation. This does not rule out that subsequent and related strains are also recognized, but the manufacturer does not define this because it cannot or does not want to give any guarantee:
Continue reading →