Islam: Abolition of Civilisation, Part II

Our Indian correspondent The Kafir sends this follow-up to last week’s essay about Islam.

Islam: Abolition of Civilisation (Part II)

by The Kafir

In the year 1988, Salman Rushdie’s novel The Satanic Verses was published. Khomeini issued the fatwa. Salman Rushdie was a British citizen. The UK government immediately forced him into hiding, with heavy police protection. The UK had its Muslims. There was no way to know who among them might kill Rushdie. A mob could have come and lynched him. The British knew all this.

If the British knew all this, one might expect they would figure out all the logical things which followed from the affair: Muslims do not respect the West’s concept of free speech, there is no way to find out which Muslim is a potential killer of a blasphemer, and Muslims become mobs for the most outrageous of causes. Therefore, if the UK wanted to keep its free speech rights, it needed to stop Muslim immigration.

In fact, this should have been done by all the Western countries. Instead they opened the gates wider. They even encouraged Muslim immigration, legal and illegal. For example, Tony Blair. And Angela Merkel.


How did the West reach this point? The times when the elites of the most educated, advanced, prosperous, and happy countries of the West want to destroy the countries they are ruling? And the citizenry seem to be just clapping along?

The answer is that in the nineteenth century a man was born named Karl Marx. He confused the masses, and he frightened the elites. He misunderstood the source of wealth, let the masses loose on the elite, and they started making compromises, and now know nothing except making compromises, with anybody who threatens violence.


Burnham understood that Marxism/Communism/Leftism was also the abolition of morality: ‘“Dialectical logic.” Is simply a devise that declares “whatever serves the interest of communist power is true.” (Burnham quoted in the introduction to Suicide of The West, written by Roger Kimball [page 11, Kindle edition]). And the liberals ruling the West are Marxists lite. They know no absolute morality. It is all relative for them. Therefore, they now have different moral laws for different sections of society.

They started with the industrial workers. According to the leftists, the industrial workers are an exploited lot; therefore they are entitled to use violence. Normal laws of morality do not apply to them. They can picket the industrial plant, can wreck it, can even kill the owners. Because they are exploited. The ruling elites gave in. Perhaps they were afraid that if the workers were not allowed to burn down the industrial plant, they might march to parliament building and burn it instead. This was the first exemption from the moral laws granted by the civilized, and it has been downhill ever since. It led to the destruction of industrial plants in the West and rise of the Dependency Class. Work has this profound magical quality that it creates character in the men doing it. Without work, on welfare, Western people lost that character. Word also got around that being a ‘victim’ or ‘oppressed’ gives one exemption from the moral laws. Liberals began manufacturing ‘victim classes’, and people happily joined, because, well, who wants to be burdened with the morality?

Continue reading

The End of Free Speech and Thought in Europe

The Deep State oligarchs who manage the European Union are absolutely determined that the serfs, peons, and other Untermenschen of Europe must be silenced by any means necessary. Those ignorant yokels have no business meddling in affairs of state, which must be left to their betters to run as they see fit — and all for the good of the “people”, of course.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the Austrian portal Heimatkurier. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

EU censorship law: “Hate speech” on a par with terrorism and human trafficking

Through a resolution by the EU Parliament, laws against “hate speech” are to be introduced in all EU countries. But the ostensible “fight against hate” aims to censor and suppress the political opposition and its supporters. At this year’s WEF meeting in Davos, resolutions were also passed to massively expand censorship. On January 18, the EU Parliament passed a new law that makes so-called “hate speech” a crime throughout the EU.

The vote was clear in the left-center dominated parliament: 397 yes votes, 121 no votes and 26 abstentions.

“Hate speech” is equated with terrorism

The decision puts so-called “hate speech” on the EU crime list. This allows the European Commission to introduce binding legislation and penalties for all member states. The list actually only includes crimes that have a “cross-border interest” in combating them, such as terrorism, human trafficking or cartel crime. This puts people who post politically unpleasant content on the Internet on the same level as terrorists and drug cartel gangsters. The EU has already threatened social media platforms with sanctions and regulations. [And that comes out of the mouth from one of the biggest terrorist and human trafficking organizations on the planet and against their own people. Go figure.]

“Hate speech”: A vague definition

This massive expansion of thought paragraphs serves the sole purpose of persecuting politically disapproved people and opinions. The official statement already gives an idea of these intentions. It is said that hate speech is “a danger to society as a whole because it undermines the foundations of the EU”. The definition of alleged hate crimes is up in the air and can be interpreted in any way. Basically, anything that a person perceives as offensive or hurtful may be interpreted as hate speech and can therefore soon be charged. There are no clear definitions or control bodies. [That’s the whole point with these so-called LAWS. They are not designed to protect the people, but rather the parasites in politics and society.]

Will gender criticism soon lead to a stretch in prison?

According to the current definition, “criminal discrimination” refers to the alleged denigration of origin, ethnicity or religion. However, left-liberal law makers want to massively expand this definition because, in their eyes, it is no longer up-to-date. In the future, any alleged discrimination against sexuality, sex and gender characteristics, trans identities as well as age and disability would also constitute a criminal offense. It is impossible to predict who will be targeted by the muzzle paragraph. This may affect people who criticize the adoption rights for homosexuals as well as critics of drag queen reading lessons in kindergartens.

Continue reading

Everyone Must Come Along

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the online news portal Nius. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Federal government officially decides: free travel for smugglers in the Mediterranean

On Thursday, the German Bundestag passed Nancy Faeser’s (SPD) repatriation improvement law. The draft law originally also envisaged an expansion of the criminal liability for helping escapees, which would have affected the actions of the so-called “sea rescuers” in the Mediterranean. But this has now been completely deleted. How did that happen?

The Committee on the Interior and Homeland met one day before the vote in Parliament. The draft law was changed and supplemented at short notice. One of these innovations: “Exclusion of sea rescue from the scope of smuggling offenses by reference to land routes.”

Pick them up and then bring them to Europe

On Thursday, the Bundestag adopted the changes with the votes of the SPD, Greens and FDP. The CDU/CSU and AfD factions voted against it. The Bundestag has thus issued a free pass to the so-called “sea rescuers” in the Mediterranean. For years, reports have been circulating about the way the predominantly German organizations such as “Jugend sucht” [another meaning for the word “Sucht/search” is “Sucht/addiction”, and in this case these hateful and traitorous “youth” are addicted to the destruction of their own families and country], “Sea-Watch” and “SOS Humanity” are colluding with human traffickers. The smugglers pick up African migrants in small boats and set them loose from the beaches in Tunisia or Libya; the “sea rescuers” then collect them a few kilometers off the coast and take them to Europe.

The traffic light government originally wanted to tighten Section 96 of the Residence Act in order to be able to take tougher action against smugglers. The judiciary in Germany only assumes smuggling if a monetary advantage is achieved or promised. Volunteers are therefore exempt from prosecution.

Refugee lawyers opposed this [Refugee lawyers? That’s nothing less than the same league as a drug cartel lawyer, a criminal parasite who found a loophole niche for his or her criminal activity. In short, they are ideological and greed driven advocates for white genocide.]

Pressure grew from the ranks of organizations active in the Mediterranean to change the law. After reading the paper, numerous refugee lawyers raised objections: lawyers associated with “SOS Humanity,” a “sea rescue” association that collected €790,000 in tax money last year, accused the coalition of “criminalizing civilian sea rescue.”

The draft will “lead to considerable legal uncertainty and enable the risk of criminal investigations being initiated against civilian sea rescue,” warned law professor Pauline Endres de Oliveira from Berlin’s Humboldt University together with other lawyers in a statement to the Bundestag . “In the opinion of the signatories of this statement, civil sea rescue should not be subjected to criminal prosecution,” it says. [Since they claim to be “sea-rescuers”, then they should follow the international rules of the nearest harbour, now, shouldn’t they? Anything else is human trafficking.]

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

We’re Here, You’re Kafir, Get Used to It

A demonstration in Berlin against the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany) was co-opted by Hamas supporters and repurposed as a protest in support of “Palestine”. For the anti-fascists who launched the original demonstration, it was kind of like clicking a link to a website that’s been hacked, and being redirected to a nasty porn site or phishing scam. “This is not what I wanted!”

What’s interesting about all this is the up-front way the culture-enrichers justified their action, saying in effect, “You wanted cultural enrichment, so here we are. Now you have to do things OUR way.”

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Apollo News. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

“You wanted the Muslims — now we’re here!”: Palestine mob hijacks anti-right demonstration

On Alexanderplatz in Berlin, many wanted to demonstrate against the AfD, the “right wing” and “remigration”. But they are being pushed out by Arab Palestine protesters. The young Arabs explain: “You wanted the Muslims and refugees. Now they are here.” [And we’re going to take over in the name of Islam and enslave or kill you if you oppose that.]

As previously announced, pro-Palestinian groups hijacked and disrupted an anti-AfD demonstration at Berlin’s Alexanderplatz on Wednesday evening. Many people gathered in front of the Red Town Hall in the capital to protest against the AfD’s “deportation plans”. But mobs with Palestine flags began aggressively taking over space at the demonstration.

“You wanted the refugees and Muslims! Now they’re here!”

Conflicts quickly arise between the “against the right” demonstrators and the young people with the Palestine flags, who apparently come from Islamic countries. The German demonstrators “against the right” are angry. “Shame on you!” a man shouts to the group. “Free Palestine is not the topic of this demonstration.” He is met with angry opposition from the ranks of the Palestine demonstrators. “Of course that’s what it’s about!” shouts a man with the distinctive scarf worn by Palestinian militants. “Palestine is everywhere! Palestine everywhere!” [I guess we all know what they mean by that, now, don’t we? Without having to read between the lines, this simply means “Kill the kuffar”.]

The apparently “bio-German” participants in the demonstration against the AfD and the “right” repeatedly expressed angry opposition to those who tried to co-opt the protest with Palestine flags. But they seemed helpless. A young Arab shouts: “You wanted the refugees and Muslims! Now they are here! We are there! Don’t you want us?” The desperate announcement from the microphone that anti-Semitism is “not an opinion” is lost in the disruptors’ shouts of “Free Palestine”. People who film the mob are harassed.

Suddenly the anti-AfD protesters themselves are being insulted as “Nazis” [Well, that’s exactly what they are.]

Armed with megaphones, the Palestine demonstrators start a fight for sovereignty at Alexanderplatz. The demonstration is to be completely taken over — the majority of young Arabs feel entitled to do so. A completely angry woman shouts into the megaphone that the demonstrators are racist because they don’t want to let them take over the entire demonstration. “This is racism! You are racists and Nazis!” Suddenly the Palestine mob chants “Nazis out” — meaning those who actually came to protest against “Nazis”. [Palestinians, which to a large percentage of their population are fans of Hitler, are calling others Nazis? What hubris. Although they aren’t wrong in that assumption about people that want to ban opinions other than their own.]

Then the Palestine group takes up more space. A man with an Israeli flag is expelled, and the bearer of a Pride flag also appears to be retreating. The mob of young migrants wants to demonstrate: This is our place.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

The EU is the place where, when you go there, they have to take you in

Political leaders and the media normally play on our heart strings by showcasing the suffering of the Puir Wee Bairns of the Third World. It’s always about the kids — that way, anyone who opposes the proposed policy (whatever it might be) is a heartless wretch, an amalgam of Ebenezer Scrooge and Adolf Hitler.

When it comes to the “refugees” pouring into Europe, however, there’s a problem: almost none of them are puir wee bairns. The vast majority of them are military-age men. Some of them pretend to be “unaccompanied minors” to game the asylum system, but almost all of those swarthy heavy-bearded fellows turn out to be full-grown men.

Now it seems the Powers That Be have hit upon a solution to the puir wee bairn problem: any woman who is a victim of domestic violence qualifies for asylum protection in the EU. Which means virtually 100% of the female population south of the Mediterranean or east of Aqaba. And most of those puir battered wives have plenty of wee bairns to bring in with them when they arrive. Then later their husbands can join them under family reunification policies!

What better system could be devised?

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the Austrian portal Heimatkurier:

300 million people entitled to asylum: ECJ declares domestic violence to be a legitimate reason for fleeing

The European Court of Justice recently made a momentous decision. According to a recent ruling, experiencing domestic or sexual violence is enough to be eligible for asylum in the European Union. This suddenly turns hundreds of millions of women worldwide into potential asylum seekers .

The European Court of Justice has repeatedly been noted for fueling population exchange in the EU member states with questionable decisions. This was also the case last Tuesday. A landmark decision in Luxembourg ruled that domestic violence can be a legitimate reason for asylum in Europe. According to “Brot für die Welt/ Bread for the World”, this affects almost 300 million women worldwide — who, at least according to the ECJ, now all enjoy the right to asylum in Europe.

Kurdish woman fled from forced Islamic marriage

The case in which the fatal verdict was pronounced was an ethnic Kurdish woman with Turkish nationality. She was forced to marry as a child and got divorced. In the Islamic world, this often results in honor killings. The European Court of Justice has now ruled that women are considered refugees if “they are exposed to physical or psychological violence, including sexual violence and domestic violence, in their country of origin because of their gender.”

Honor killings have long been imported into Europe

Particularly bizarre: Through the population exchange, the practices from which the Kurdish woman is actually seeking protection have long since been imported to Europe. Honor killings are commonplace, especially among the imported clans. Forced Islamic marriages and child marriages also take place again and again, albeit hidden from the public.

Asylum is completely unrestricted

The judgment is an example of the ECJ’s increasing delimitation of the right to asylum. The question arises as to where the line should be drawn — should victims of bullying or death threats also be entitled to asylum in the future? If you follow the logic of liberal extremism, there is probably no one in the world who cannot concoct a reason to flee. An example of this is the demand of the African-born Green Party politician Aminata Touré — she wants to recognize genital mutilation “unconditionally” as a reason for asylum.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

Paying Through the Nose For Cultural Enrichment

The following video provides a succinct indication of how expensive it is to provide accommodation for “asylum seekers” in the Netherlands.

RAIR Foundation includes this introduction:

In the Netherlands, there’s a significant political controversy involving the Dutch government’s spending on asylum seekers while many citizens live in poverty. The government has allocated 24 billion euros for asylum support, highlighting a stark contrast to the one million Dutch citizens living below the poverty line. Central to this debate is Eric van der Burg, the acting State Secretary, who is relieved that a new law about distributing asylum seekers among municipalities has gained support in the Senate.

However, this law has caused political inconsistency within the People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy party (VVD), a major political party in the Netherlands. The VVD members in the lower house of Parliament opposed the law, while their counterparts in the Senate supported it. This difference in stance within the same party has raised questions about their political coherence and strategy.

Erik de Vlieger, a prominent real estate entrepreneur, criticized the government and suggested that those who voted for left-wing Prime Minister Mark Rutte or the VVD party were misled. During the debate, Van der Burg revealed the substantial costs associated with housing asylum seekers, with figures reaching 31,000 euros per year for regular asylum accommodations and 65,000 euros per year for emergency shelters.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Time For Those Wonderful Global Partnerships

Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, made some inspirational remarks this week in Davos. She sees the WEF’s primary task as the suppression of free speech, although she expresses it somewhat differently: fighting “misinformation and disinformation.”

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Apollo News. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

At the WEF

Von der Leyen: Our biggest enemy is disinformation [says the Queen of “safe and effective” disinformation]

The biggest challenge of our time is disinformation, says Ursula von der Leyen at the World Economic Forum. Conflicts can only arise from this, said the CDU politician. It is time for global partnerships, “and we can do it,” (“wir schaffen das”) says von der Leyen.

This year’s World Economic Forum in Davos (WEF) wants to “build trust” again — that is the motto of the meeting, which is also attended by EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. On Tuesday, the CDU politician presented what she considers to be the most important factors for the next few years, quoting the WEF’s annual report almost verbatim. Her speech should also have the motto “Building trust,” or at least that’s what she says. “And I believe we can do it,” assures the former Federal Defense and Federal Minister for Family Affairs. [The only reason these people build up trust is so that they can push the dagger into people’s backs more forcefully and deeper.]

The most crucial issues in the coming years, according to von der Leyen, are “not conflicts or the climate” — she avoids the term “change” here; by now everyone should know what “climate” is aimed at — but “disinformation and misinformation.”

The 65-year-old also believes that “polarization in our societies” is a big problem and that “changes in demographics” also make global coexistence more difficult [Really? Then why do you want even more demographic changes and refuse to deport those who are criminals out of Europe?]. These risk factors also give rise to “geopolitical conflicts” and global disputes. Above all, as von der Leyen says specifically, this “impacts supply chains.” [A toddler in his or her first week in kindergarten could have told her that. What a lying harpy.]

Because the world’s situation is more dire than it has been for decades, the motto of this year’s WEF is all the more important: “Rebuild trust,” the EU politician emphasizes stoically. Because we would not live in a time of polarization, but should “build trust,” she repeats again and again.

“It is time for global partnerships, more than ever before. That’s why we need immediate and structured answers to the global challenges,” von der Leyen warns again and adds the sentence mentioned at the beginning, “I think we can do it,” with a diplomatic smile. We are familiar with quick decisions and “we can do it” slogans from another Christian Democrat.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

Brave New Pedagogy in Schleswig-Holstein

For a quick peek into the German campus of the Brave New World, check out this post from the website of the “the state representative for political education” in Schleswig-Holstein. Many thanks to Hellequin GB for the translation:

Workshops for school classes

In the workshops “Crime Scene Social Networks: Conspiracy myths and fake news on the Internet” we want to sensitize young people to fake news and conspiracy myths and teach them how to deal with them confidently. Together with the journalist and blogger Carsten Janz, students discuss how conspiracy stories work and how you can deal with them and fake news.

The project is scheduled to last two years and includes 76 school workshops and four teacher training courses. The call for proposals for the workshops in the second half of the 2023/2024 school year is currently running.

Afterword from the translator:

This looks to me like trust in the established media and state institutions has sunk so low that in their desperation they are pulling out all the stops and giving up all restraint. They want to bombard students with courses and “learning materials” designed to condition them to believe what politicians and mainstream media say, and to dismiss doubters as “conspiracy theorists”. Why do I have the feeling that those pupils who successfully complete this course will raise their right arm and shout “Sieg Heil” at the “graduation” ceremony?

China, the Clown State

Our Bangkok correspondent H. Numan reports on the latest geopolitical news from the Far East.

China, the clown state

by H. Numan

You’re not going to believe me. Recently new corruption scandals have rocked the People’s Republic of China. The commander of the Chinese Rocket Forces disappeared. A bunch of army, navy and air force top commanders also vanished in Nacht und Nebel. That happened a couple of months ago, but now they are all officially charged with corruption. Not just a bit of corruption. Corruption on a scale that baffles even Russians. China is very busy trying to become a superpower. They have the biggest army in the world, the biggest navy in the Pacific… but… it’s of little or no use. It is all falling apart.

Thailand

Before I continue, two related stories from Thailand. The new Srettha government was planning to allow Chinese police stations in tourist areas. Real People’s Police offices with semi-diplomatic status, where Thai officials would be welcome only on invitation. All to accommodate and support Chinese tourists, of course. What else?

A part of the soft power of China is tourism. Thailand relies heavily — as do many other nations in the region —on Chinese tourists. About one-third of all foreign tourists used to be Chinese. They vanished during and because of the Covid pandemic. Now the pandemic is over, Thailand wants them back. Apparently, at all costs.

That gave the Chinese government a nice opportunity. China is, as we all know, a communist dictatorship. Its citizens cannot freely travel, not in China itself (you need internal passports) and certainly not abroad. Percentage-wise, not that many Chinese can afford to travel abroad, but with +1 billion you have a lot of tourists who can. Most Chinese travel in groups. That’s a pretty common way to travel in Asia anyway, but in China there is another reason. A group is much easier to control than individual travelers. And China can control who gets this pot of gold. Provided they are nice to the Chinese government, that is. For example, micro states in the Pacific who acknowledge Taiwan suddenly didn’t get any tourists. Until they cut formal relations with Taiwan. Then, all of a sudden all ‘problems’ were solved and the flood of tourists came back.

People’s Police stations in Thailand

The Chinese government wanted real Chinese People’s Police stations in Thailand. Once that happened, all restrictions would be lifted. To manage Chinese tourists? Of course! What else? To control Thailand? The very idea! Thailand is an independent country, and proud about it. This created so much of a nationwide outcry that PM Srettha hastily withdrew those plans.

The Kra Canal

We’re not done yet, because China is big. They have more irons in the fire. The next one is ongoing, with a (small) possibility of succeeding. The Kra canal. You all know the most famous canals of the world, being the Panama and Suez canals. Another maritime choke point is the Strait of Malacca. At the moment maritime traffic is at a maximum. Large ships have to make reservations in order to cross it. For China it is of vital importance. All oil and most commerce to and from China has to pass the strait. It’s very easy to block by just about anyone. India, for example, is fortifying the Andaman Isles just to be able to do that. A canal through the narrow part of Thailand in the deep south might solve that problem for China, and give them another route. Which could just as easily be blocked, but now you have two passages to control.

That would be the Kra Canal. That’s a centuries-old dream of Thailand/Siam/Ayutthaya. They always wanted such a canal. However, it’s far more difficult to construct than the Panama canal, so nothing ever happened. Many projects were initiated, but no shovel ever hit the dirt. As long as I have been in Thailand (30 years!) rumors about reviving the Kra canal came and went.

This time the Chinese government is putting a lot of pressure on Thailand to construct one. Money is not an issue. Engineering can be done by the Chinese. We finance it too, on (for China) excellent conditions. Just allow us to build the damn thing!

I doubt very much whether it will ever happen. Singapore isn’t exactly thrilled to see half of their maritime trade sail away. A small state, to be sure, but with a lot of commercial power. America won’t be overjoyed either. Biden or Trump doesn’t matter. A Kra canal is not in the interests of America.

Another problem that will rear its ugly head: the revolting southern muslim provinces. They are located exactly on the other side of the proposed canal. The first problem will be unruly muslims milking the project for all they can. The second problem is that once the canal is there, independence is no longer a pipe dream. Rather something that almost certainly will happen when those provinces are separated by a huge canal from the mainland. A lot of water will flow through the Chao Phraya before it will happen. If at all.

Continue reading

No Wife of Mine…

In the following video, a “French” footballer and TikTok influencer (whatever that is) named Adel Sidi Yakoub lays down the law for his future wife. It will be interesting to see how many “French” women are eager to line up and apply to be Mrs. Yakoub. Having tasted the fruits of emancipation, will the culture-enriching females of France be keen to return to purdah?

Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

It’s the Religion, Stupid

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this German-language post from Twitter:

Thought experiment shows: Climate narrative has long since become an ideology

Let’s assume for a moment that science finds out that temperatures on earth are falling, that CO2 is not the main driver of the climate, or that climate change has a positive impact on crop yields and prosperity will impact worldwide. In other words, the climate panic would be canceled for one of the reasons listed.

What would sound like good news would have massive consequences for the course chosen. The agreements between states to reduce emissions would be invalid, and the restructuring of industry and energy supply that has taken place so far would be meaningless in the new context. Capital flows amounting to thousands of billions of dollars would suddenly be called into question. Party programs would have to be rewritten.

In the thought experiment we can now test how realistic it is to assume that these new scientific findings would actually become widespread. Would the truth be stronger than all party-political, industrial and ideological interests? No, of course not. This assumption would be naïve. No one in power would simply agree to change the climate narrative and put their own interests aside. There is far too much at stake for that.

If this is not the case today, what year was the “point of no return”? When did the climate course become set in stone? The course was set at the latest with the Paris climate agreement in 2015. Presumably already with the establishment of the IPCC in 1988, which had the task of proving man-made climate change.

When viewed from a meta-level, the matter is clear: the climate narrative is an ideology. Science is no longer open-ended. Since probably 1988, at least since 2015. Everything else is wishful thinking. The harsh treatment of critics, the censorship we experience, the massive propaganda in the media underline this result of the thought experiment.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

School Days in Sweden

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from Nyheter Idag:

Chokings and threats of “halal slaughter” — Everyday violence in middle schools in Skåne)

Pupils who are choked, beaten, and humiliated, teachers who are attacked when they try to intervene, and children who threaten to take a knife to school to “halal-slaughter” other children. This is how everyday life looks in three Skåne middle schools according to an investigation done by Sydsvenskan.

The newspaper examined the Naverlönn School in Svedala, Hjärups School, and Ljungen School in Furulund, which were chosen because they are of the same size, are located in the periphery communities outside Malmö and Lund, and the examination covered three time frames, all of 2022 and the spring of 2023.

In one case, the newspaper revealed that a boy was chased through the schoolyard and kicked when he was down. He was threatened with violence if he tried to get away, held in a chokehold, and his face rubbed with a shoe.

“Every week, some sort of fight happens. When the younger students run out of words, then it goes to a kick, a shove, or occasionally a choking,” says Naverlönn School principal Anna Moberg to Sydsvenskan.

In another case, sixth graders chased a pupil through the school. When a teacher tried to intervene, she was attacked, shoved, and pulled by the arm. The pupil who was attacked managed to break loose and seek shelter in a group room.

In one report, it states that “a pupil threatens to take a knife to school and ‘halal-slaughter’ another pupil,” while in another report, a pupil threatened to kill another pupil for several days, “if not today then some other day.”

In one fall, a school employee testifies how a pupil was struck several times in the face. After a visit to the health center, it is reported that the affected pupil received a slight concussion and had sores in his mouth.

The attacking pupil says in a conversation that he had experienced a threatening situation and had been told by his father “that it is OK to hit back”. During a family meeting, it comes out that the father has given “permission” to hit and “didn’t see any problem” with that.

“In the cases where cooperation with parents is more difficult, we see challenges in working with the pupils in school, “says social pedagogist Emelie Eldsvan at Naverlönn School to Sydsvenskan.

“Every two weeks on average, alarming reports on pupils at the school are sent to social services. What is positive is that together we apply for more and more guardians. Parents themselves feel they need help,” says Principal Anna Moberg to the newspaper.

Cut ’Em Loose!

Police in Cologne were able to thwart a planned Islamic terror attack on Cologne Cathedral on New Year’s Eve. Fortunately for the Great Jihad, however, three of the detained mujahideen have since been released.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Cologne Cathedral: Judge releases terror suspects

Three migrants who are said to have planned an attack on Cologne Cathedral are free again. A judge lets the go after just one night in custody. [They were planning the attack for New Year’s Eve of 2023 and since New Year’s Eve of 2023 is past and we’re in 2024 now. Therefore they are no longer a danger. It’s obvious, duh, isn’t it? So there is no reason to keep them in police custody any longer. (irony off)]

Cologne

A judge released three of four men who were taken into custody on New Year’s Day for a planned New Year’s Eve attack on Cologne Cathedral. The 25-, 30- and 38-year-old Muslims only spent one night in police custody.

The Cologne police announced this without providing the court’s reason. A total of five men are suspected of planning an attack on Germany’s largest Christian church. Four of them have Tajik or Uzbek nationality. A German-Turk was also arrested in Bochum on the last day of last year.

Cologne Cathedral massively protected on New Year’s Eve

However, a 25-year-old Tajik, who was among those arrested on New Year’s Eve, will remain in police custody for 14 days “after a thorough investigation into the case.” A 30-year-old countryman who was arrested on Christmas Eve in Wesel, 100 km north of Cologne, is also expected to stay there for two weeks, “to avert danger.”

Shortly before Christmas, the police received information from a foreign secret service about a planned Islamist terrorist attack on Cologne Cathedral. The security precautions at the church were then massively increased. On New Year’s Eve, a large police force protected the cathedral.

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading