Multiple EU member states are following the EU policy of removing children from their parents if they show too much attachment to their mothers and fathers. Because that weakens their attachment to the State, and we can’t have that, now, can we?

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Uncut News.

Note: this text was translated from Romanian to German, and then from German to English, so the syntax may get a little bumpy from time to time:

New EU policy: State confiscation of children for “over”-attachment to the mother

Being loving parents has already become a crime in EU countries. This has led to the state tearing children from their families and locking them up in social centers because they are too attached to their mothers. Child confiscation measures have multiplied and spread to more and more EU countries, which is the new EU policy, and Romania will also join this policy through the controversial child monitoring center, which is a milestone in the NRP.

The European Parliament’s Petitions Committee was embroiled in a major scandal last Wednesday after MEPs rejected a report against Germany’s abusive policy of removing children from their families. The report might have had a significant impact on the German state, which would have been forced to return children to their families, says Marius Tudor, an adviser in the European Parliament. One of the reasons children were taken from their families was “excessive attachment to the mother”, since in Germany that would be against the safety of the child.

“At school, the child said he loved his mother, missed his mother, wanted to stay with his mother, and child protection kicked in. This is also the case of a Romanian girl in Germany, the daughter was taken away and placed in an institution because she expressed her love for her mother at school. For two years the little girl was taken away from her mother and father and for four months the poor mother was not even allowed to visit her child in this social center. Now she can only visit her regularly, but the German state will not return her child. In Germany, the law provides that the state also has rights over the child by granting them free access to education and other public services.”

Romania adapts

What happened in the European Parliament with this vote is unbelievable, because most MEPs are parents, says Marius Tudor. He points out that the policy of state abuse of parents already exists in Austria, Germany and the Nordic countries, and now it seems that with this monitoring for children in Romania, which is a milestone in the NRP, they are trying to address the “problem” in our country.

“Under the pretext of prevention, most children in Romania are at risk of being separated from their families, because many Romanians are poor, many have gone abroad, with or without children. In the Child Monitoring’s draft law, there is a paragraph that states that a child who has migrated for more than a year can be separated from its family. If you, the state, were not able to lift the Romanian children out of poverty, do you now want to pass a law that will take them away from me? Why, actually? Did you fight with them? Did you dress them, put shoes on them? Or do you have enough financial resources now to take care of them while you have not been able to so for decades? They actually follow orders. On the initiative of a USR (Save Romania Union) deputy, now Reper (Renewing Romania’s European Project), the EU-wide child guarantee was passed last year. Part of that guarantee is the Child Monitoring approach, which gathers all children in different difficult situations into one database,” said Councilor Marius Tudor.

Continue reading →