Category Archives: Plagues

How Bad Was Your Batch?

Posted on by

Bug or feature?

That’s the crucial question about the enormous variability in the makeup of various batches of the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from AUF1. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Chemically surprisingly different “vaccine” batches from BioNTech

A Leipzig professor of analytical chemistry recently found that even the outward appearance of the alleged Corona vaccine from the Mainz-based company BioNTech is surprisingly different from different production dates. More detailed analyses by the expert revealed astonishing things.

The company BioNTech of the married couple Özlem Türeci and Ugur Sahin [Jihadists?] has existed since 2008, but had not brought a product onto the market until the Corona pandemic. When the Mainz-based company from the Goldgrube [street name and seat of the company] launched large quantities of the allegedly technically advanced RNA “vaccine” BNT162b2 onto the market worldwide for billions of people at high speed from the end of 2020 after an amazingly short test phase, experts were amazed at how this might work without quality problems.

Danish study shows extreme differences in effectiveness

And indeed — as Daniel Matissek earlier reported here at AUF1 — a current Danish study shows significant differences in the side effects of the “vaccine” from different production times. These production batches or “lots” must be numbered and clearly documented so that inspectors can determine who made what mistake when and if problems arise.

The Danish researchers found that some batches caused a particularly large number of reports of suspected vaccine damage, others significantly less. Was it sloppy — or was the recipe different at different times? Also striking: Denmark received a certain batch particularly frequently — was one or the other lot delivered with priority after expectations of profit?

Even officially: Chemical composition different

The Leipzig chemistry professor Jörg Matysik and his colleague, the expert in organic chemistry Prof. Gerald Dyker from Bochum, researched with other scientists about the production circumstances of the BioNTech miracle drug. Grotesque: Officially, the recipe for producing the “vaccine” is not clear. The fat globules (nanoparticles) that smuggle the RNA into the patient’s cells can be amazingly different in size. The pH value, which indicates how acidic a solution is, may also vary by a full unit — only a tenth of a unit is usual! The substance ALC-0315, from which the nanoparticles are partly made, may also be contained in different proportions. In addition: The safety data sheet of ALC-0315 states that the substance is carcinogenic and irritating to the skin. After Matysik’s request, the information was described as incorrect and deleted.

Dyker and Matysik asked the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) in Berlin, which is responsible for approvals in Germany, why the tolerances for the BioNTech “vaccine” were so high — no answer.

Continue reading →

A Chinese Bioweapons Lab in Reedley, California?

Posted on by


Garry Bredefeld is a member of the city council in Fresno, California. The following video shows a press conference called by Mr. Bredefeld earlier this month, following revelations about the discovery of an illegal Chinese bioweapons lab that seems to have been conducting experiments with the COVID-19 virus using genetically modified mice.

The lab was discovered back in March, but its existence was not publicly revealed until late last month. In his remarks Mr. Bredefeld decries the failure of Fresno County officials to inform the public about the potential dangers posed by the lab. The political situation is further complicated by the fact that the lab was in Reedley, in Fresno County, but Mr. Bredefeld represents the city of Fresno. He is currently running for a seat on the Board of Supervisors of Fresno County.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for uploading this video:

To provide more context, here is an excerpt from an article published a few days ago by The Fresno Bee:

Continue reading →

Whoops! Never Mind.

Posted on by

The European Union, through its disease control agency, has locked the barn door after the horse has been stolen. In fact, not only has the horse been stolen, it has been sent to the knackers’ and rendered down into stew meat and gelatin.

It seems that the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) has determined that all the COVID-19 measures it enforced against the population were stupid and counter-productive. We “Corona-deniers” were saying exactly the same thing more than three years ago, and for our efforts we were vilified, stigmatized, cancelled, censored, and occasionally prosecuted.

It’s cold comfort to say “I told you so”, especially now that almost everyone has been jabbed with the Myocarditis Turbo-Cancer Special.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Uncut News. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

The conclusion of the European authorities: Pandemic restrictions should not have been imposed by law

According to a study by the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), measures such as house arrest and contact bans should not have been imposed during the pandemic, but only issued as a recommendation. The European authority reveals that the 2020-2022 restrictions had a catastrophic impact on all EU citizens.

ECDC research into the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the lives of adults in the EU during the Covid-19 pandemic (2020-2022) seems preposterous without knowing how disastrous the impact of the restrictions and bans have been. However, the action taken by the European authorities is not accidental, but is preparing a different approach to a future pandemic, which is being talked about more and more on all channels. In summary, the investigation concluded that the measures, which severely restricted and impaired citizens’ freedoms, should not have been enforced by force. The most correct approach would have been to leave these measures at a recommendation level, most likely referring to the case of Sweden.

Likewise, the ECDC concludes that while it would be better not to introduce such restrictions, when they are imposed they should not be generalized, and the impact they would have on both the different social categories and the economic sector should be analyzed carefully. Although it is not said directly, the ECDC acknowledges that the measures taken to combat the pandemic have been inadequate in every respect and have had dramatic consequences at all levels.

“When planning the implementation of NPIs (non-pharmaceutical measures) at the population level, the scientific community and policymakers should consider not only their effectiveness in controlling disease and improving population compliance with NPIs, but also other aspects in the context of their impact on the community in general and on groups that have been shown to be more vulnerable to adverse impacts. An example could be public health, including health indicators not directly related to infectious diseases,” the ECDC document said.

Continue reading →

Pathological Recriminations

Posted on by

I’m not familiar with the context surrounding this controversy over pathologists researching patients who received the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus. I’m hoping that German readers who know more will weigh in on the issue in the comments.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the German-language service of the Epoch Times:

Reutlinger Pathology stops research on COVID-vaccinated people

After it was recently announced that the pathological examinations of COVID-vaccinated people will continue even after the death of Prof. Arne Burkhardt in Reutlingen, there is now an abrupt reversal. Late in the evening of August 14th, The Epoch Times received the sudden and unexpected news: “Pathology in Reutlingen is closed with immediate effect.”

Prof. Walter Lang, who had agreed to take over the medical direction of the research, is no longer available for the project.

The reason given was “legal pressure to fight through the dismissals of employees before the labor court” by the Association of Doctors and Scientists for Health, Freedom and Democracy (MWGFD). The association had supported the pathological examinations with donations.

MWGFD threatens to sue

In addition, the MWGFD, on whose board of directors is the well-known microbiologist Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi, had threatened Prof. Lang with a lawsuit through a lawyer. As can be seen from the legal letter available to the Epoch Times, it was about the surrender of the laboratory equipment. These were given to Prof. Burkhardt by the MWGFD for research purposes.

The lawyer for MWGFD asserted the ownership rights of his clients “after the business basis had ceased to exist” as a result of Burkhardt’s death. The value of the medical-technical laboratory equipment is estimated at €132,220.90. Alternatively, Prof. Lang was offered the purchase of the equipment.

According to insider circles, this was the last straw that finally broke the camel’s back after months of quarrels with the MWGFD.

In a press release on August 9, the MWGFD announced that a new site for pathology examinations would be built. This was justified by the fact that the premises of the Reutlingen laboratory were part of the estate of the late Prof. Burkhardt.

The society has found an institute that will act as an intermediary to the existing pathological institutions and will have modern telepathology at its disposal so that the work can continue according to the methods used by Prof. Burkhardt.

Afterword from the translator:

I wonder from which direction the pressure came that made Dr. Lang fold? A rogue who thinks that evil is afoot…

Paul Weston: “Question Everything”

Posted on by

After an extended sabbatical — during which he decamped from Blighty and set up camp at an undisclosed location abroad — Paul Weston returns with this video about the Rainbow Curtain of Science that is now descending over the entire West and ushering in our totalitarian future:

Question the COVID Narrative? It’s the Loony Bin For You!

Posted on by

It seems the West has gone full Soviet in its use of psychiatric diagnoses to put troublemaking dissidents away in psychiatric institutions. The following case was sent by our Norwegian correspondent The Observer. All it took was the word of a doctor to get this dangerous “conspiracy theorist” committed.

The Haaland Case

By The Observer

On the 19th of July 2023 a Norwegian man, Trond Harald Haaland, was forcibly committed to a psychiatric ward for posting Covid-19 critical vaccine posts to his personal Facebook page. This happened in Stavanger, Norway’s fourth-largest city.

On the day in question, a doctor and a health care worker showed up at Haaland’s residence, accompanied by two uniformed police officers. After a short conversation, they informed Haaland he had to come with them, and subsequently escorted him to the psychiatric ward at the University hospital in Stavanger (SUS) where he spent the next nine days.

This drastic step was taken based on a ‘cause for concern’ report filed by an individual whose identity has not yet been released, but who has access to Haaland’s Facebook feed. This was ostensibly enough to have Haaland committed to a psychiatric ward.

Upon learning of Haaland’s fate, his family contacted a lawyer to represent him. And thus a review board hearing was scheduled for Friday, July 28th. And this is where things get interesting.

Here is some of the evidence that was used to have Haaland committed to a closed psychiatric ward: The doctor who made the decision based her judgment on Haaland’s Facebook posts. In her opinion Haaland displayed manic behaviour, was psychotic and paranoid, and his actions were deemed not to be rooted in reality. This conclusion was reached based on the frequency and the content of the various Facebook posts.

When Haaland’s lawyer asked the doctor if she had read the posts in question, the doctor admitted that she hadn’t, given that she is not on Facebook!

Upon hearing the evidence presented at the hearing, the jury, which consists of a doctor and two lay judges unanimously decided to discharge Haaland with immediate effect.

Haaland’s lawyer has so far been unsuccessful in obtaining the identity of the person who contacted the health authorities, and whose report subsequently led to Haaland’s ordeal.

I know this sounds like something straight out of George Orwell’s novel 1984, but this story has been corroborated by Haaland’s lawyer, Barbro Paulsen. It has also been covered by two independent and trustworthy Norwegian news sites, document.no and steigan.no.

The links to those articles are at the bottom of this essay. They are in Norwegian but can easily be run through Google translate for verification.

What we can take away from this case is that the authorities in Norway will in certain cases rely on a psychiatric diagnosis to stifle troublesome dissent. If they have a political gripe with someone, they’ll just whisper a few words in the ear of the local health authorities about their ‘concerns for the individual’s mental state’ and have the problematic person locked up in a psychiatric facility.

There are two cases that immediately jumped to mind when I first became aware of this story, and that is the ‘Breivik case’ and the ‘Gjesdal case’.

Continue reading →

No Reprieve For Holders of a Forged Vax Pass

Posted on by

The “pandemic” may be over in Germany, but there will be no reprieve for offenders who held forged certificates for receiving the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Politics rejects amnesty

[But they want us to forgive and forget the crimes against humanity they have perpetrated. Why am I not surprised?]

Police continue to hunt down holders of fake corona vaccination cards

The state is not letting up on Corona: 26,000 procedures are now underway for fake vaccination cards. There are house searches and prison sentences. The police say that’s why investigations into other crimes have been left uncompleted.

Berlin

In the fight against fake vaccination certificates, the judiciary and police are still investigating at full speed. There are now 26,000 cases pending across Germany. Die Welt reports this with reference to information from the individual federal states.

The police union therefore complains that the investigators have a high workload. However, politicians reject an amnesty for people and doctors who tried to circumvent the quasi-obligatory vaccination by 3G with a wrong stamp in the vaccination card.

Fake vaccination cards: Three years in prison for a doctor

In Berlin alone there were 110 house searches. A doctor from Recklinghausen who certified 600 patients for a Corona vaccination without having carried it out has now been sentenced to 34 months in prison.

The investigators are getting a tailwind from the Federal Court of Justice. It had decided that if an accused could not be found guilty of forging health certificates, he would have to be prosecuted for forging documents.

Due to Corona investigations, other crimes remain untouched

The police union criticized the fact that colleagues were “taken out of the so-called regular organization” in order to clarify the cases of fake vaccination cards. The federal chairman Jochen Kopelke told Die Welt that these officials were neglecting the investigation of other crimes. “The backlog of issues to be processed is therefore immense.”

Not only does the federal government reject an amnesty, but also the opposition Union. “Anyone who forges an important medical document is acting criminally,” says the health policy spokesman for the CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the Bundestag, Tino Sorge. The relief of the police should not play a role either. [Obviously, they don’t want the mass murder they helped perpetrate to be investigated. Instead attack those who wouldn’t/couldn’t become their victims. Go figure.]

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading →

“We Have Been Lied To”

Posted on by

Alexandra Henrion-Caude is an Anglo-French geneticist. She holds a doctorate in genetics from the University of Paris-Diderot.

In the following video Dr. Henrion-Caude lists a series of assertions that were made about the experimental mRNA treatments intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus, and later turned out to be false.

Many thanks to HeHa for verifying the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading →

Indian Giver

Posted on by

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Boris Reitschuster’s website. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Just empty promises? State demands the return of Corona aid

The government assesses the legal situation completely differently than in 2021

At the beginning of the Corona crisis, the federal government under then-Chancellor Angela Merkel promised generous and unbureaucratic help to medium-sized companies, small businesses and the self-employed. They were hopeful signals at a time that was characterized by measures to contain the virus that were at times just as arbitrary as they were completely exaggerated.

The application for the bridging aid was tedious and it took some patience until the money flowed. But for some, the emergency aid became a dangerous boomerang early on. At the end of 2021, more than 30,000 small businesses and the self-employed were required to repay a total of €288 million in emergency Corona aid that they had received in the spring of 2020, shortly after the outbreak of the crisis.

All those whose liquidity bottleneck was less than previously forecast were asked to pay. However, all additional costs incurred by entrepreneurs and the self-employed were not taken into account. In addition, the applicants could not claim wages for themselves. The dubious support was a complete mockery because Olaf Scholz, still Minister of Finance in spring 2020, proudly announced that it was not a subsidy: “So nothing has to be repaid.”

More than half a million companies have applied for Bridging Aid III alone

But that’s not all: many companies and self-employed people are still receiving repayment notices these days. “All bridging aid will be reclaimed — a total of millions. Payable within one month, otherwise there is a risk of enforcement measures and high interest rates.” This is the email from a tax consultant to a dismayed entrepreneur, quoted by the FAZ [Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung].

The author of the guest article, Dennis Hillemann, assumes that “many thousands more” of such repayment requests will follow. According to the specialist lawyer for administrative law and partner at the Fieldfisher law firm in Hamburg, those who were supposedly so generously funded at the time are affected by a special legal aspect: All state bridging aid during the Corona crisis was granted subject to full review and reclaim.

Now the entrepreneurs and solo self-employed have to submit final accounts. All of the data will then be examined again. To do this, the licensing authorities use legions of consultants from large auditing firms. A lot is at stake: more than half a million companies have applied for the so-called Bridging Aid III alone, and more than €33 billion has been paid out.

The Federal Ministry of Economics takes a different view without any reason

With the government takeover by the traffic light coalition*, the legal situation was “suddenly very often and differently assessed than in 2021,” writes Hillemann. “What used to appear to be harmless has now become a problem.” Likewise, applications were rejected and claims for reimbursement issued with the open reference that, after consultation with the Federal Ministry of Economics, a different view would now be taken.

For example, automotive suppliers or machine builders are suddenly accused that their slump in sales in 2021 was not “Corona-related” after all, but that is a prerequisite for the subsidy. Even with hairdressers it is said “with governmental coldness”: “People use their services less, perhaps due to inflation.”

Continue reading →

Your Papers, Please

Posted on by

The World Health Organization is planning to implement a system of digital health passports or vaccination certificates that will be used to limit the travel and activities of citizens in the event another “pandemic” is declared. The entity doing the declaring will, of course, be the WHO itself. The ultimate goal is to enroll every human being on the planet in the new system.

Once it is in place, the architects of global governance will be able to restrict the freedom of movement of the populace. Coupled with a mandatory digital currency (which means the abolition of cash), it will allow the authorities control what people can buy and where they can buy it. It will eventually force them out of their motor vehicles, after which they may be induced to move to a 15-minute “smart” city and eat the bugs.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Aufl.info. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

End of freedom of travel: WHO and EU launch digital world vaccination card

The health dictatorship sought by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the EU is becoming very concrete. Now the bag is finally closed: On Monday, the two organizations announced the start of a “groundbreaking digital health partnership”. The WHO is now taking over the EU system of digital COVID-19 certification. This is to facilitate a global mobility management system and protect citizens anywhere in the world from current and future health threats.

In the future, the WHO can declare a pandemic and link people’s freedom to travel to a “vaccination”. Those who refuse can no longer leave their country.

Goodbye freedom of travel

The WHO and the EU are now openly in lockstep initiating the global prison state in the name of “health”. The pandemic contract, which is to be signed in 2024, is only the seal on it. The digital COVID-19 certificate was one of the key elements of the EU in the COVID-19 pandemic. To facilitate “freedom of movement” (permission to travel) within its borders, the EU rapidly introduced interoperable COVID-19 certificates (entitled “EU Digital COVID Certificate” or “EU DCC”). Based on open-source technologies and standards, it also enabled the connection of non-EU countries issuing certificates according to EU-DCC specifications, becoming the most widely used solution worldwide.

EU and WHO dictate

The WHO set the general guidelines for this right from the start. To strengthen global health care “in the face of growing health threats,” the WHO is establishing a global digital health certification network powered by EU technology. The aim of this network is to make the digital certificate “palatable” to every country in the world. The WHO defines the standards and the validation of digital signatures for fraud prevention. The WHO does not (yet) have access to the underlying personal data. These remain (for the time being) reserved exclusively for governments. [And we can trust those guys with our lives, now, can’t we?]

Secretly decided

The decision for the current initiative was signed back on December 2, 2022, between EU Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides (for the EU Member States) and WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. With this partnership, “a robust multilateral system with the WHO at the heart and a strong EU will be further strengthened,” according to an EU press release. The decision is based on the EU Global Health Strategy and the Global Digital Health Strategy of WHO Member States. It is also supported by Minister of Health Johannes Rauch.

Continue reading →

The European Union Will Shut Your Mouth For You

Posted on by

The European Union is planning a new set of draconian speech restrictions to be imposed on all major social media platforms. The “pandemic” is simply the most obvious and most recent excuse for the crackdown. It’s obvious that the Powers That Be are determined to enforce their groupthink on all citizens.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Uncut News. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

The mother of all censorships is approaching. The digital law eliminates all opinions that contradict the system.

The Digital Services Act (DSA), an EU-level regulation, is practically the mother of all censorship. Under the guise of online platforms’ transparency and accountability, any opinion that goes against the system is eliminated. More specifically, the regulation obliges the platforms to mitigate risks such as misinformation or election rigging with the help of “trusted” bodies that will censor everything.

The turbulent times of the pandemic have highlighted the aggressive censorship practiced by the authorities, combined with social networks no longer shying away from eliminating voices, particularly those of professionals and medical luminaries, who disagree with the official narrative. During the pandemic there was virtually only one opinion, and those who dared to disagree were ostracized and publicly lynched. Censoring the opinions of people outside of the medical field wasn’t so destructive, but the fact that reputable and respected medical researchers became pariahs overnight simply for daring to point out the flaws in logic and the distortion of science itself is unthinkable.

EU leaders have consistently complained about low vaccination rates in some countries, including Romania, and pointed fingers at “conspiracy theories” circulating on social media. [Well, everybody who read the SPARS document from Johns Hopkins University knew straightaway what was coming.] Did they make a difference in our country? In part, because more important was the survival instinct of the population, who sensed something was wrong and chose to resist the pressure or, when they had no choice, to stick with the sham vaccine. In the meantime, all the “conspiracy theories” have come true, but public attention has been deliberately drawn to other crises. Eagerly preparing for the next pandemic, which will depend very much on who wins the battle between the two world orders, the European Union is now introducing an official act of total censorship.

General Surveillance

The Digital Services Act is a regulation that applies directly across the EU. Obligations imposed on very large online platforms and search engines include monitoring their risk management measures through independent audits. The platforms must also contain risks such as misinformation or election manipulation, cyber-violence against women or the endangerment of minors on the Internet. [I bet that the LGBT crap will be pushed and opposing voices will be silenced that way.] The law also provides for measures to combat illegal content online, including illegal goods and services. The DSA provides new mechanisms for users to report illegal content online and requires platforms to work with specialized “trusted whistleblowers” to identify and remove illegal content, as well as effective protections for users, including the ability to override platform decisions, challenge moderation of content, based on new mandatory information for users when their content is removed or restricted.

Continue reading →

Rumor Control Central

Posted on by

The Food and Drug Administration is asking American citizens for their assistance in fighting “misinformation” about health. And — as we have learned over the last thirty years since Hillary Clinton began the process of nationalizing the health care system — that means misinformation about anything, because everything can be re-cognized as concerning health. The food you eat, the places you go, the people you associate with, how you spend your money — all of these can be related to your health, and each choice can be ranked according to how good or bad it is for your bodily well-being.

It goes without saying that the FDA will do the ranking of all activities as they pertain to health, and then define anything that deviates from that schema as misinformation.

In order to help ensure that everyone’s health is optimized, the FDA will make it easy and convenient to report misinformation — that is, what they consider unfounded rumors and inaccurate information about anything they deem health-related. At this particular historical moment, COVID-19 and the “vaccines” are obviously their main concerns. But other unhealthy behaviors will also come under scrutiny. We can already catch a glimpse of some of the general topics that will at some point be considered relevant: “climate change”, eating the bugs instead of meat or dairy, not using the internal combustion engine, adopting a digital currency, getting chipped, and so on. All of these will fall under the rubric of “health”, and therefore be subject to regulation by the national socialist federal health care system.

Citizens will be strongly urged to report anyone who propagates “misinformation” on any of these topics. Furthermore, when the system is fully mature, we may expect that the reporting of information criminals will become mandatory — the duty of every civic-minded person. Those who peddle misinformation are a danger to our democracy, which depends on the universal acceptance of a single truth in order to be able to function. Propagators of false information must be exposed and silenced.

That’s what the FDA’s “Rumor Control” site is aiming at:

Find the Truth

Get the latest fact checks and help stop the spread of false rumors.

The growing spread of rumors, misinformation and disinformation about science, medicine, and the FDA, is putting patients and consumers at risk. We’re here to provide the facts.

Watch how to identify and help stop the spread of health misinformation. [YouTube video]

After that come these features:

  • Learn the Facts
  • Health Information For You
  • What the FDA Does For You
  • Share the Facts

Next you can download a pdf document by means of which you may “Learn about how you can identify and address misinformation.”

It’s mostly in graphical form, and is designed in a grade-school format. It’s available in English, Spanish, Chinese, Tagalog, Vietnamese, and Korean.

No French, German, or Italian. Hmm…

Finally, and most importantly:

How to Report Misinformation Online

We face the challenge of an overabundance of information related to our public health. Some of this information may be false and potentially harmful.

Inaccurate information spreads widely and at speed, making it more difficult for the public to identify verified facts and advice from trusted sources, such as the FDA.

However, everyone can help to stop the spread. If you see content online that you believe to be false of misleading, you can report it to the applicable platform…

Then it has icons and links for the following platforms:

  • How do I mark a Facebook post as false news? Click here
  • Reduce the spread of false information on Instagram. Click here.
  • LinkedIn: Recognizing and reporting spam, inappropriate, and abusive content. Click here.
  • Report inappropriate content on TikTok. Click here.
  • Report a tweet, list or direct message on Twitter. Click here.
  • How to report a contact or a group on WhatsApp. Click here.
  • Report inappropriate content on YouTube. Click here.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

The normal reaction to all of the above would be one of outrage, but I recommend tamping down that instinctive response, if you can, because outrage at this point serves no useful purpose.

You can contact your elected representative, and it will make no difference whatsoever. For that matter, voting itself will make no difference whatsoever. You can vote for whomever you like, and the federal government will continue doing this stuff, no matter what.

Outrage is a waste of psychic energy. Pointing out the hypocrisy and double standards is a waste of time. Identifying all the ways in which these actions violate the Constitution is pointless — the Constitution has been dead for a long time now, and “our democracy” keeps chugging along just fine without it.

At one time I would have recommended that we attempt to break the system by overloading it — posting as much controversial material as possible, making stuff up, signing off on any paranoid lunacy that comes along, etc. We might thus make it impossible for the tech monitors to keep up with all our “misinformation” — there would simply be too few employees to handle it.

Continue reading →

The Survival of the Fittest Slave

Posted on by

The Hungarian government seems to believe that we’re in for another “pandemic”, and that we should prepare for it. Our Hungarian correspondent László has the report.

The Survival of the Fittest Slave

Shut Up and Prepare for the Next Plandemic, Slaves!

by László

The obvious brief translation [from Newspeak] of the Hungarian FM’s below speech recently held at the WHO General Assembly: ‘The next plandemic is coming and we’re submitting to tyranny again.’

Newspeak is easy-peasy!

The translation of the article from Pesti Srácok:

Péter Szijjártó: Hungary is prepared for a possible new health crisis

Hungary has taken all the necessary and possible measures since the coronavirus outbreak to prepare for a possible next health crisis and to be able to protect people’s lives, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade Péter Szijjártó said in Geneva on Tuesday. According to the ministry’s statement, the minister pointed out at the World Health Organisation (WHO) General Assembly that the past three years have been challenging, one of the most serious being the coronavirus epidemic.

“The most important task for the international community now would be to prepare for a similar challenge in the future,” he warned, but said that to do so, “over-politicisation of international health must be avoided.”

“We believe that politics and ideology have nothing to do with saving human lives. If geopolitics is confused with health issues, it will cost many lives, and nobody wants that,” he said.

Szijjártó underlined that the experience of the successful Hungarian epidemic response is that it would have cost many more lives if geopolitical aspects had been taken into account when saving lives.

“If we had just waited for the President of the European Commission to order vaccines by text message, we would have saved many fewer lives”, he said.

He added that the government had instead acted by buying vaccines from the East [China], the effectiveness of which had been proven by Hungarian experts. The result was that Hungary was able to launch the fastest vaccination campaign in the European Union, the first among member states to lift restrictions and the first to deliver 8.6 million doses of vaccines to countries in need, he said.

The minister stressed that the pandemic had made it clear that it was vital to build strategic capacity that might normally be considered unnecessary or too expensive, as it could save lives in a crisis.

Continue reading →

The Birth Dearth

Posted on by

There’s been a lot of discussion lately about the worldwide wave of excess deaths, which mainstream opinion says cannot possibly be due to the deleterious effects of the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus.

The following article discusses a marked reduction in the birth rate during the same time period, except for being shifted nine months. This also has nothing whatsoever to do with the vax.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Norbert Häring’s blog:

Sharp fall in the birth rate in February triggers yet another wave of hectic non-reporting

The announcement of another very low number of births in February by the Federal Statistical Office has again led to a wave of non-reporting in the German media. Everywhere there was no speculation and no experts were asked why it could be that the birth rate in Germany has been unusually low for about nine months after the start of mass vaccinations.

The established media are thus falling into the same pronounced non-hysteria — indifference — that they already showed when they did not report on the high excess mortality in Germany and many other countries in 2022.

According to the Federal Statistical Office, only 51,199 babies were born alive in February 2023, 2,528 fewer than in the previous year. In January, there were 54,648 live births, 3,758 fewer than a year earlier. This continues a downward trend that has been almost uninterrupted since early 2022.

The statisticians announced these figures yesterday morning (Tuesday). In the evening, I entered the term “declining birth rates” into the DuckDuckGo and Google search engines. The result on the first results page (apart from regional reports, as well as historical and general explanatory articles):

DuckDuckGo

1.   An undated press release from the Federal Statistical Office from 2023 about births in 2022. The decline from the average from 2019 to 2021 was then 5.2%.
2.   A July 2022 article by the rebellious alternative online publication Deutsche Wirtschaftsnachrichten entitled “Dramatic Decline in Births in Germany and Worldwide.”
3.   A contribution from Tagesschau.de in which, with reference to a brief study by the Federal Institute for Population Research, it is explained to us that the decline in the birth rate is probably only a short-term phenomenon, caused by the fact that women have postponed their desire to have children until it was their turn to be vaccinated.
4.   An alarmist online press release from a group called “pediatricians” from December 2022.
5.   A contribution from the public broadcaster MDR from September 2022, in which, with the help of an expert from the Federal Institute for Population Research, we are told that the drop in births is to be expected, normal and only temporary and probably has to do with the fact that women have temporarily put off their desire to have children until it was their turn to be vaccinated.
 

Google:

Continue reading →