Free Speech Under Fire: Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

Last Wednesday the Center for Security Policy hosted a panel discussion, “Free Speech Under Fire: The Red-Green Axis’ Unrestricted Warfare in OSCE and Beyond”. The panelists were Christopher Hull, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, Clare Lopez, and Deborah Weiss.

There is also a CSP research paper (PDF) available for download, which includes material by Frank Gaffney, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, Robert Spencer, Deborah Weiss, and Clare Lopez.

The video of the full event is here.

Below are excerpts from panel discussion featuring Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff.

1. Elisabeth discusses her prosecution for “hate speech” in Austria:

2. On the significance to Americans of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE):

3. “Hate Speech is Free Speech”:

From Frank Gaffney, the president of CSP:

Free Speech Under Fire: The Red-Green Axis’ Unrestricted Warfare in OSCE and Beyond

(Washington, DC): The West’s free speech is under fire. It seems that every day, from every direction, the enemies of freedom encroach more upon this most sacred right. We see “snowflakes” on college campuses shouting down or even attacking speakers with whom they disagree. We see the politically correct mainstream media exploding in outrage over every utterance of President Donald J. Trump that does not meet their politically exacting standards. We see politicians too mealy-mouthed to tell the truth — especially when it comes to the brutal, totalitarian Islamic ideology known as Sharia, of which the meekest critique generates faux cries of “Islamophobia.” We see social media giants stamping out speech of those with whom they disagree, while they allow the speech of jihadis to flourish. We see international organizations, from the United Nations to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation to the little-known Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), working each in its own insidious way to strangle expression.

And from everywhere, we hear the trope, “hate speech.” What is hate speech, exactly?

Continue reading

For the OSCE, the Gate of Ijtihad Closed in 2002

Sunni Islamic Law is a compendium of rulings that enjoy the consensus of the scholars — that is, the interpretations of the Koran and the sayings of Mohammed that comprise the body of the Sharia, and that were agreed upon by all the major judicial scholars during the classical period of Islam.

The interpretation, or ijtihad, of Islam’s sacred texts by legal scholars ended about a thousand years ago. “The Gate of Ijtihad is closed”, as the saying goes — all that could be learned about Islamic law was discovered by that time, and no further interpretation is allowed. The Sharia is now set in stone. The modern Islamic jurist has only to apply the law in a thorough and rigorous fashion. Innovation, or bid’ah, is not permitted.

As you may remember, during last month’s OSCE conference in Warsaw various Counterjihad activists who read out interventions that criticized Islam were rebuked by the moderators, who said it was the “consensus of the participating States” that such intolerant speech would not be permitted.

The frequently-repeated assertion of “consensus” reminds me of the consensus of the scholars that set Islamic law in stone a thousand years ago.

In her report on OSCE Warsaw, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff noted:

The decreed truth for the OSCE since 2002 has been that its member states strenuously reject identification of terrorism and extremism with a particular religion. Ergo, there is no discussion and the problem is solved — that is why Europe is incapable of putting a stop to the terrorism coming from just one particular group.

So it seems that the Gate of Ijtihad closed for the OSCE in 2002 — a millennium after it did for Islam, but better late than never!

In the video below Christopher Hull, who was a member of the Counterjihad team at OSCE Warsaw last month, appears on Liz Wheeler’s program on OAN to discuss the sharia-compliant behavior of the staff and leadership at the OSCE:

For links to previous articles about the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, see the OSCE Archives.

The Truth Versus the OSCE’s Decreed Truth

The following report on last month’s OSCE conference in Warsaw by Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff was published by JournalistenWatch and kindly translated by JLH. See the OSCE Archives for more on the events in Warsaw this year.

The Truth Versus the OSCE’s Decreed Truth

by Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff
September 26, 2017

In the last few days, Europe’s largest and best attended conference on the subject of human rights (“human dimension”) came to an end. There were said to be 1500 attending. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe invited diplomats and experts, as well as the general public to an annual discussion in Warsaw about observance of human rights standards in the OSCE area. For the first time, the conference took place in Warsaw’s EURO soccer stadium, which was welcome because of the size of the locale and the number of participants.

Our delegation included members from the United States, Denmark and Austria. It is regrettable that many European fighters for freedom of expression couldn’t make up their minds to come to Warsaw. They would have contributed to a stronger presence, which is so important nowadays. For example, a deficit in (allotted) time and personnel prevented mentioning many of the considerable restrictions of freedom of expression in Germany (German justice minister Heiko Maas and his restrictive law passed at the end of June), as well as the many judgments and harassments against alleged cases of “hate speech” or the problems of the AfD in renting locations in the run-up to the election.


Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff at OSCE Warsaw 2017

The first two days were devoted to the official opening, with speeches by politicians, and to freedom of the press and freedom to assemble. Pax Europa spoke first about the scandalous verdict against Michael Stürzenberger and then about the problems of the organizers of the “March for the Family” in Vienna[1]. Neither of these subjects elicited a response from the governments in question.

The sessions on Thursday and Friday were concerned with the subjects of religious freedom as well as tolerance and non-discrimination. Customarily, these subject areas are not only contentious, but also characterized by full lists of speakers. This year, too: Early queuing to get on the speakers list, contentious positions, but also — something new — rebukes from the moderator, referencing OSCE “commitments” that must be adhered to. These rebukes were exclusively directed at our delegation.

An OSCE employee told us personally that our truth was not his truth, nor that of the OSCE. There was no discussion. He noted parenthetically that the OSCE has sought ways to exclude our delegation from participating, but did not succeed because of its own rules concerning civil society.

The decreed truth for the OSCE since 2002 has been that its member states strenuously reject identification of terrorism and extremism with a particular religion. Ergo, there is no discussion and the problem is solved — that is why Europe is incapable of putting a stop to the terrorism coming from just one particular group. The saying goes: Know your enemy. If I cannot name the enemy or investigate it, I cannot expect it to be defeated. We might also ask what would have happened if this kind of law had prevailed in the 1930s.

Continue reading

OSCE: Canadian Representative Wants to Squash Free Speech in the Name of “Tolerance”

In the following video from OSCE Warsaw the Canadian representative used his right to respond to take exception to Debbie Anderson’s intervention warning about M-103. He essentially said that Canada intends to squash free speech in the name of “tolerance”, branding those who spread alarm about M-103 as the intolerant ones.

As an example of the hatred and intolerance being permitted in Russia, he cited the oppression of gays in Chechnya — neglecting to mention, of course, that the persecution of gays in Chechnya is being carried out by Muslims in line with Islamic law.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:

See Vlad’s remarks on this intervention.

For links to previous articles about the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, see the OSCE Archives.

ADF International: The OSCE Must Reaffirm Its Commitment to Free Speech

The following video shows the intervention read by Jennifer Lee, representing ADF International, at OSCE Warsaw on September 15, 2017, during Session 8, “Tolerance and non-discrimination II”.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:

For links to previous articles about the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, see the OSCE Archives.

Dave Petteys: The Cairo Declaration Discriminates Against Non-Muslims

The following video shows the intervention read by David Petteys, representing the Sea Jay Foundation, at OSCE Warsaw on September 15, 2017, during Session 8, “Tolerance and non-discrimination II”.

Note that Mr. Petteys was given the standard OSCE rebuke by the moderator after his intervention.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:

For links to previous articles about the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, see the OSCE Archives.

ESW at the OSCE: The Perversion of Tolerance to Justify Censorship

The following video shows the intervention read by Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, representing Bürgerbewegung Pax Europa, at OSCE Warsaw on September 15, 2017, during Session 8, “Tolerance and non-discrimination II”.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:

Below is the prepared text for ESW’s intervention:

Continue reading

OSCE: Repeal the Blasphemy Laws!

The following video shows the intervention read by Henrik Clausen, representing Wiener Akademikerbund, at OSCE Warsaw on September 15, 2017, during Session 8, “Tolerance and non-discrimination II”.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:

Below is the prepared text for Mr. Clausen’s intervention:

Continue reading

Clare Lopez at the OSCE: Equality Under the Law — No Equality Under Sharia

The following video shows the intervention read by Clare Lopez, representing the Center for Security Policy, at OSCE Warsaw on September 15, 2017, during Session 8, “Tolerance and non-discrimination II”.

Note that Ms. Lopez was given the standard OSCE rebuke by the moderator after her intervention.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:

Below is the prepared text for Ms. Lopez’ intervention:

Continue reading

John Andrews: SPLC is a Purveyor of Hate

The following video shows the intervention read by John Andrews, representing Americans for America, at OSCE Warsaw on September 15, 2017, during Session 8, “Tolerance and non-discrimination II”.

Note that Mr. Andrews was given the usual OSCE rebuke by the moderator after his intervention.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:

For links to previous articles about the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, see the OSCE Archives.

Fiyaz Mughal at the OSCE: The Misuse of Free Speech Must Be Prevented

The following video shows the intervention given by Fiyaz Mughal, representing Tell MAMA in the UK, at OSCE Warsaw on September 15, 2017, during Session 8, “Tolerance and non-discrimination II”.

Note that Mr. Mughal received no rebuke from the moderator after his intervention.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:

For links to previous articles about the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, see the OSCE Archives.

John Andrews: The Spirit of Voltaire Has Left the Continent

The following video shows the intervention read by John Andrews, representing Americans for America, at OSCE Warsaw on September 14, 2017, during Session 7, “Tolerance and non-discrimination”.

Note that Mr. Andrews was given the standard OSCE rebuke by the moderator after his intervention.

For links to previous articles about the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, see the OSCE Archives.

OSCE: Muslims and Discrimination

The following video shows the intervention read by David Petteys, representing the Sea Jay Foundation, at OSCE Warsaw on September 15, 2017, during Session 8, “Tolerance and non-discrimination II”.

Note that Mr. Petteys was given the standard OSCE rebuke by the moderator after his intervention.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:

For links to previous articles about the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, see the OSCE Archives.

OSCE: Integrating Muslims into Political Life

The following video shows the intervention read by Henrik Clausen, representing Wiener Akademikerbund, at OSCE Warsaw on September 13, 2017, during Session 4, “Ensuring equal enjoyment of rights and equal participation in political and public life”.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:

For links to previous articles about the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, see the OSCE Archives.