American Apostates from Islam Affirm Their Freedom

Nonie Darwish is a well-known former Muslim. She was born in Egypt, converted out of Islam, and now lives in the United States. But even here — in a country where freedom of speech and freedom of religion are constitutionally guaranteed — she faces intimidation and harassment for daring to leave Islam.

As Phyllis Chesler wrote yesterday:

Nonie DarwishNonie Darwish, the warmest, sanest, least prejudiced Egyptian whom I know, has both been attacked and has not been defended by the administrative elite at the Whittier College Law School where she is scheduled to speak later today. According to Steven Emerson, the Muslim Student Association on campus defamed Darwish and tried to stop or at least delay her presentation.

Not surprising. They specialize in such demonization and censorship campaigns. Darwish pleads the case of Muslim women whose human rights are seriously violated by shariah law. But the academic administrators at Whittier Law School have not strongly defended her right to speak, nor have they praised her work. This is unforgivable; according to Emerson, many happen to be women who are also feminists.

This is a process that has become all too familiar in recent years as courageous apostates from Islam have been abandoned by both civil libertarians and feminists. The hypocrisy of the progressive Left is now completely exposed: the human rights that they have putatively championed for all these years are not universal. When Islam walks through the door, the Left falls suddenly and mysteriously silent about the right of Muslims to choose their own destiny.

However, America’s former Muslims aren’t waiting for the approval of the Left to assert their freedom. They’ve organized a new group called Former Muslims United under the leadership of Nonie Darwish, Mohammed Asghar, Amil Imani, Wafa Sultan and Ibn Warraq:

Former Muslims United was formed in September, 2009 by a group of leading American apostates from Islam — Nonie Darwish (Director), Mohammed Asghar, Amil Imani, Wafa Sultan and Ibn Warraq — to educate the American public and policymakers about the need for Muslims to repudiate the threat from authoritative Shariah to the religious freedom and safety of former Muslims. Our national campaign for civil rights and physical safety for former Muslims was launched with the creation of a pledge for Muslim leaders to sign — “ The Muslim Pledge for Religious Freedom and Safety from Harm for Former Muslims.”

The first group of Muslim leaders were sent pledges to coincide with the date September 25, 2009.

I’ll have more to say about the Pledge below. But first, some excerpts from the group’s mission statement:

1.   Develop a legal framework for and ensure the civil of American individuals and organizations to provide sanctuary for former Muslims without being subject to legal penalties or threats.
2.   Call on all Muslims and their spiritual leaders to reject, publicly and without reservation or exception, all Sharia doctrine that permits or calls for punishment or discrimination against former Muslims, including intimidation and threats against person or property. This rejection of violence applies to individuals, Sharia authorities, Muslim courts or other Sharia bodies, governments, and quasi-governmental bodies.
3.   Form a support group to empower and give comfort to former Muslims enabling them to stand up for their religious liberties under the US Constitution.
  […]
7.   Demand Muslim leaders reject and denounce all Islamic literature which calls for death or other punishments for former Muslims.

The members of Former Muslims United are tackling the most urgent issue that can be faced by those who have chosen to leave Islam. In any country where there are significant numbers of Muslims, apostates face the risk of death at the hands of their former fellows. Islam permits — indeed, it requires — the death penalty for apostasy, as well as for other crimes such as blasphemy and adultery.

Since the strictures of Sharia run contrary to the freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, Former Muslims United requests that Muslim leaders in the United States specifically and unequivocally affirm the civil rights of former Muslims by renouncing Sharia wherever it contradicts those rights.

On Friday September 25th — the day after tomorrow — 50,000 Muslims are scheduled to gather for prayers on Capitol Hill. FMU has chosen this occasion to present American Muslim leaders with the Freedom Pledge. The cover letter for the pledge states:

We send this letter to you to be received by September 25, 2009. On that date 220 years ago in 1789, the U.S. Congress passed the Bill of Rights. This is a fitting date to put our pledge to the world, for the first of those rights guarantees religious freedom and freedom of speech. These rights are, as our Declaration of Independence states, unalienable — they cannot be denied to any of us. For former Muslims, who throughout history have lost their liberties and lives when they left Islam, both the First Amendment and the Declaration of Independence have special significance.

As founders of Former Muslims United, we now pledge our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to achieve for former Muslims their unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. We claim these rights as the foundation for our right to freedom from Shariah. We urge you to join us.

Our request is simple. The need is urgent. Please sign the pledge and encourage others in your organization to do so as well. We await your response.

And the Freedom Pledge itself reads:
– – – – – – – –

The Muslim Pledge for Religious Freedom and Safety from Harm for Former Muslims

Whereas:

All four schools of Sunni Islamic law (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali), as well as the other main schools of Shia Islamic law (al-Isma iliyyun and Ithna ashariyya), unanimously agree that a former Muslim male, also known as an apostate, must be executed. While some hold that an apostate woman should also be executed, the Encyclopedia of Islamic Law: A compendium of the Major Schools, adapted by Laleh Bakhtiar, states that she should be imprisoned or beaten five times a day until she repents or dies. These specific world renowned Islamic legal authorities join in this consensus:

Head of the Fatawa Council of Al-Azhr, Abdullah al-Mishadd, Al-Azhar University, the pre-eminent Shariah legal authority, Fatwa issued 23rd September 1978: “This man has committed apostasy; he must be given a chance to repent and if he does not then he must be killed according to Shariah. As far as his children are concerned, as long as they are children they are considered Muslim, but after they reach the age of puberty, then if they remain with Islam they are Muslim, but if they leave Islam and they do not repent they must be killed…”

Mufti of Lebanon, Beirut, Fatwa issued 13 November 1989: “Now, should the apostate (male or female) persist in his apostasy, he should be given the opportunity to repent, prior to his being put to death, out of respect for his Islam. A misunderstanding on his part may have taken place, and there would thus be an opportunity to rectify it. Often apostasy takes place on account of an offer (of inducement). So Islam must be presented to the apostate, things should be clarified, and his sin made manifest. He should be imprisoned for three days, so that he may have the opportunity to reflect upon his situation. This three-day period has been deemed adequate. But if the man or the woman has not repented of his or her raddah, but has continued to persist in it, then he or she should be put to death…”

Ibn Rushd (Averroes), The Distinguished Jurist’s Primer, “Chapter on the Hukm of the Murtadd (Apostate),” Volume II, (p. 552), Section 56.10: “An apostate, if taken captive before he declares war, is to be executed by agreement in the case of a man, because of the words of the Prophet (God’s peace and blessings be upon him), “Slay those who change their din:. They disagreed about the execution of a woman and whether she to be required to repent before execution. The majority said that a woman (apostate) is to be executed…”

Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri, Reliance of the Traveller, translation approved by Al-Azhar Islamic Research Academy and IIIT, 1994. (p. 595): “ o8.1 When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed….o8.4 There is no indemnity for killing an apostate (O: or any expiation, since it is killing someone who deserves to die).”

Ismail R. Al-Faruki, the Founder of International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), Islam, 1979, (p. 68): “That is why Islamic Law has treated people who have converted out of Islam as political traitors…[Islam] must deal with the traitors when convicted after due process of law either with banishment, life imprisonment, or capital punishment…but once their conversion is proclaimed, they must be dealt with as traitors to the state.”

Louay Safi, the former Executive Director of IIIT and the Executive Director of the Islamic Society of North America’s (ISNA) Leadership Development Council, Peace and the Limits of War, IIIT publication, 2003 (p. 25): “A quiet desertion of personal Islamic duties is not a sufficient reason for inflicting death on a person. Only when the person’s desertion of Islam is used as a political tool for instigating a state of disorder, or revolting against the law of Islam, can the individual apostate then be put to death as a just punishment for his act of treason and betrayal of the Muslim community.”

Shaikh Syed Abul A’ala Maududi, Pakistani Islamic authority, The Punishment of the Apostate According to Islamic Law, translation by Syed Silas Husain, 1994: “In any case the heart of the matter is that children born of Muslim lineage will be considered Muslims and according to Islamic law the door of apostasy will never be opened to them. If anyone of them renounces Islam, he will be as deserving of execution as the person who has renounced kufr to become a Muslim and again has chosen the way of kufr. All the jurists of Islam agree with this decision. On this topic absolutely no difference exists among the experts of shari’ah.”

Therefore:

To support the civil rights of former Muslims, also known as apostates from Islam, I sign “The Muslim Pledge for Religious Freedom and Safety from Harm for Former Muslims”:

I renounce, repudiate and oppose any physical intimidation, or worldly and corporal punishment, of apostates from Islam, in whatever way that punishment may be determined or carried out by myself or any other Muslim including the family of the apostate, community, Mosque leaders, Shariah court or judge, and Muslim government or regime.

This inspired initiative is a precision weapon aimed at the very heart of the dilemma faced by American Muslims.

If, as they repeatedly claim, Muslim leaders truly support political liberty and the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution, then they should have no trouble signing it.

On the other hand, if they do sign it, they’re violating the tenets of their own religion, as codified in the Koran and the hadith and backed up by 1400 years of Muslim juridical tradition. Those who agree to sign the pledge would thus become vulnerable to retaliation by the very same people who threaten Nonie Darwish, Wafa Sultan, and all the other Americans who have chosen to leave Islam.

American Muslim leaders are being backed into a corner. How will they respond?

Cousin Marriage Debate in the Netherlands

I mentioned last night that the ill effects of cross-cousin marriage have become so obvious that even the Arab media are noticing the problem and talking about how harmful it is to the Arab gene pool.

But that was in Dubai. In the Netherlands, conditions are… well, different. The Dutch government has taken a look at the issue of cousin marriage, and determined that there may not be anything it can do about it. The European Convention on Human Rights protects everyone’s right to a “family life”, you see, and if that life includes marrying your close relatives, then why should the government interfere?

Or, more to the point, the Dutch authorities are worried that the EU court in Strasbourg will come down hard on them if they interfere with the marital proclivities of their increasingly vocal culturally-enriched minorities.

Here’s the story, as reported by Politiken:

Can Cousin Marriages be Banned?

NRC HANDELSBLAD: The Dutch government wants to prohibit marriages between cousins, but experts wonder if that is possible.

What if two cousins sleep together, have a baby and then want to get married. Is that allowed? What about this situation: a young Moroccan Dutch man marries his female cousin in Morocco and then brings her to the Netherlands. Is that permitted? Or rather: will that still be permitted in future?

According to Ashley Terlouw, professor of sociology of law at Radboud University in Nijmegen, it is doubtful whether such cases can be prohibited. Aside from the question of whether it is a good idea.

“Everyone’s right to a family life is protected in section 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. If the Netherlands does not respect that, the Court in Strasbourg will have something to say about it.”

Experts have responded with surprise — and some with shock — to the plan that Deputy Minister for Justice Nebahat Albayrak announced last week to ban marriages between cousins. It is one of the measures aimed at reducing the number of so-called import brides (and grooms).

Increase in import marriages

Detailed information on the ban and its enforcement is expected in a few weeks, but it is already clear that the ban will apply to everyone, not just ethnic minorities among whom most marriages between cousins take place. The ban will not be imposed with retroactive effect.

“It does not seem right to me to apply family law to migration policy,” said Terlouw. “Moreover it is a measure that affects more people than you want it to.” Nor will the ban necessarily bring about any decline in marriage migration. “The Netherlands cannot ban marriages in other countries and will have to recognise most cases. Added to this is the fact that it is certainly not the case that all foreign marriages are between cousins.”

A driving force behind the measure is the increase in the number of Dutch residents who ‘import’ a spouse from the country of their parents.

After years of decline, the number went up last year by thirty percent to 15,000. But the municipal records do not keep track of how many of these marriages involved cousins marrying each other.

– – – – – – – –

According to researchers from Leiden University, a quarter of Turks and Moroccans marry a relative. A European survey, which only looked at second-generation immigrants, indicated that just over eight percent of Turks and six percent of Moroccans reported they were married to a cousin.

Does Albayrak have her facts straight?

Albayrak said last week that marriage between cousins was prohibited in the past, but that is a stubborn misconception said Frans van Poppel of the Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute. Only since 1970 has the law permitted an uncle or aunt to marry their nephew or niece, but there has never been a ban on marriage between cousins, according to Van Poppel.

It seems as if Albayrak does not yet have all her facts straight, said Han Entzinger, professor of integration and migration studies at Erasmus University in Rotterdam.

“I see that Moroccans and Turks are in fact bringing partners from abroad less frequently.” That is also due to the income requirement that the Netherlands has introduced. The partner here must now earn at least 120 percent of the minimum wage before he can bring a partner from abroad.

“Which incidentally has an adverse effect in that many young people stopped their college education to try and earn as much money as possible,” said Entzinger.

Proponents of a ban on marriage between cousins stress that they hope this ban will put a stop to forced marriages. Entzinger has serious doubts whether this goal will be achieved. He responds with questions: “What is defined as a forced marriage? Is an arranged marriage also forced? How many forced marriages actually take place? And how would such a ban be enforced?”

Health risks not significant

It seems as if politicians are seeking a new way to ban marriage between cousins. From 2003 there have been efforts to introduce the ban on grounds of health risks. This has failed time and again. Last year health minister Ab Klink decided that a ban would be disproportionate. Research has shown that parents who are related, including cousins, have a four percent chance of a child with a genetic defect. That risk is two percent for parents who are not related.

If politicians are really concerned about stopping forced marriages and preventing health risks, Albayrak should instead concentrate on better information provision, said the researchers. And on a harsh approach to those who impose forced marriages.



Hat tip: TB.

The Suppression of Free Speech in Europe

Below is a report by Dale Hurd of CBN News about the suppression of free speech in Europe. Thanks to the Islamization of Europe and the influence of the OIC, “defamation of religion” laws work in one direction only: in favor of Muslims and against everyone else.

Lars Hedegaard of the International Free Press Society and Geert Wilders — two people who are already well-known to Gates of Vienna readers — are prominently featured in this video:

[Post ends here]

Gates of Vienna News Feed 9/22/2009

Gates of Vienna News Feed 9/22/2009The illegal immigrant shantytown near Calais — known locally as “the Jungle” — was finally shut down in a special operation by the French police. Immigrants’ rights protesters attempted to prevent the police from closing the camp, and some arrests were reported. Nearly 300 immigrants, both adults and children, were relocated to “special centers”. It’s not clear what will happen to them next.

In other news, a Coptic Christian in Egypt was murdered and beheaded by a Muslim. The killer roared away on a Harley-Davidson and attempted to murder two more Copts before he was caught by police.

Thanks to AP, Barry Rubin, C. Cantoni, Fjordman, Insubria, JD, Lurker from Tulsa, Sean O’Brian, Steen, TB, Zenster, and all the other tipsters who sent these in. Headlines and articles are below the fold.
– – – – – – – –

Financial Crisis
FDIC Could Seek Bailout From Banks
Italy: Jobless Figure Rises as Recession Worsens
 
USA
A Casino Coming to Your Neighborhood?
Another Obama Program Caught in Undercover Sting
Austria in the ‘30s: Mirror to America
‘Drunk Boris Yeltsin Tried to Hail Taxi Outside White House in Underpants’
Get Ready! Here Come the Energy Police
Islamic Rally on Capitol Clouded by Organizer’s Terror Ties
Killing Granny
‘Nut’-House Empire
Steven Chu: Americans Are Like ‘Teenage Kids’ When it Comes to Energy
Sunstein Picked for Sharing Obama’s Radical Views?
The Globo Threatens National Sovereignty
U.S. Charges Obama Fund-Raiser in $290 Million Fraud
Vatican Official: Church Erred in Holding Kennedy Funeral
 
Europe and the EU
‘Dark-Haired’ Voters Become Focal Point of German Elections
Ireland: ‘No’ Side Are More Committed — Ganley
Ireland: Blow to ‘Yes’ Bid as Church Refuses to Take Sides
Ireland: We Are Parasites. We Moralised, Postured, And Lectured as We Received Billions in Aid From EU
Ireland’s National Sovereignty Under Threat
Italy-Slovenia: Berlusconi, Good Neighbours
Italy: Premier and Fini Lunch to Mend Rift
Obama’s Treachery in Eastern Europe
OECD: Italy: Productivity Could Increase by 10% With Reforms
Spain: Even Bullfight Fans Against De La Vega Bull Death
Spain: Teacher Become Public Officers Against Bullies
Supposedly Pacifistic Calls for a Withdrawal of German Troops From Afghanistan Raise Thea Dorn’s Hackles
Terrorism: France/Italy Trade Northern Africa Information
UK: Council Spends £100k of Public Money on Rebranding Museum… Only to Keep Original Name
UK: Forgetful Patients to be Fitted With Microchips to Remind Them to Take Their Pills
UK: Father Arrested for Carrying Out Citizen’s Arrest on Yobs ‘Who Threw Apples at Him and His Wife’
UK: Jilted Student ‘Watched Beheadings and Terror Videos to Beef Himself Up Before Stabbing His Ex-Girlfriend’
UK: Most Rivers Fail to Meet Tough New EU Pollution Standards
UK: New US Ambassador Wants to Show America is Not a ‘Dumb’ Or ‘Bullying’ Power
UK: One in Six Patients ‘Wrongly Diagnosed by NHS Doctors’
UK: Police Told to Treat Hundreds More Attacks as ‘Honour’ Crimes
UK: Public School Teacher Jailed for Lesbian Trysts Can Still Meet Victim, 15, On Release From Prison
UK: Payouts to Inmates Who Wait Too Long for Parole
UK: Retired Couple’s Home Trashed by 150 Yobs Who Gatecrashed Granddaughter’s Party Advertised on Twitter
UK: Social Workers Ignored Mental Patient Brandishing Knife Days Before He Stabbed Grandfather to Death
UK: School Children ‘Tried to Strangle’ Boy, 9, With Skipping Rope in Playground
 
Balkans
Serbia: Gay Parade Activists Vow to Fight
Serbia: EU to Approve Additional Eur 200 Million Aid
 
Mediterranean Union
Animals: Mediterranean; Agriculture Top Cause of Extinction
Mammals: Mediterranean, One in Six Species Risks Extinction
 
North Africa
Muslim Man Beheads Christian in Egypt
 
Israel and the Palestinians
EU: Veneto Wins Project for Israel and Palestinian Activity
Morocco: Investment Fund Buys Land in Jerusalem
Music: Elvis Unites All Just a Stone’s Throw From Jerusalem
Swedish-Israeli Relations Continue to Deteriorate
 
Middle East
Barry Rubin: How the West’s Enemies Are Saving it
Brzezinski Suggests Obama Shoot Down Israeli Jets
Cinema: Lebanese Press Attacks Israeli Film ‘Lebanon’
Iran Nuclear Head Says New Centrifuges Built
Yemen: Army Defeats Shia Attack, 140 Rebels Killed
 
South Asia
Kabul: Flowers and Cards for the Fallen, You Are Our Heroes
U.S. Says Pakistan, Iran Helping Taliban
 
Sub-Saharan Africa
Kenya Criticises US Somali Raid
Muslims Mass-Producing Children to Take Over Africa, Says Archbishop
 
Immigration
Denmark and Ireland Drop ‘Sham Marriage’ Demands
France: Police Dismantle Migrant Camp in Calais
Italy’s Migrant Crackdown Sparks Political Tensions
Rome’s Migrant Policy in Spotlight
Video: Police Clear French Migrant Camp
 
Culture Wars
Abortion: Spain; Go-Ahead From State Council for New Law
Obama Science Chief: Abortion Can Save Planet
 
General
Bulgarian Chosen to Head UNESCO

Financial Crisis


FDIC Could Seek Bailout From Banks

WASHINGTON (AP) — Regulators have approached big banks about borrowing billions to shore up the dwindling fund that insures regular deposit accounts.

The loans would go to the fund maintained by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. that insure depositors when banks fail, said two industry officials familiar with the conversations, who requested anonymity because the plans are still evolving.

Regulators also are considering levying a special emergency fee on all banks, charging regular fees early or tapping a $100 billion credit line with the U.S. Treasury, the officials said.

FDIC spokesman Andrew Gray said that while borrowing from the banks “is an option, it’s not being given serious consideration.” The board meeting where the plans will be discussed is scheduled for next week.

But a government official familiar with the FDIC board’s thinking said earlier Tuesday that the plan was being considered. He requested anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the matter.

The fund, which insures deposit accounts up to $250,000, is at its lowest point since 1992, at the height of the savings-and-loan crisis. Ongoing losses on commercial real estate and other loans continue to cause multiple bank failures each week.

FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair wants to avoid tapping the Treasury credit line, and Treasury officials insist that the strongest big banks have enough extra capital to operate, the officials said. Comptroller of the Currency John Dugan, who is a voting member of the FDIC board, has said he doesn’t want to levy another fee on banks while the industry is still recovering.

The loans would give big, healthy banks a safe harbor for their money and would limit their risk-taking, said Daniel Alpert, managing director of the investment bank Westwood Capital LLC in New York.

It also would allow the industry’s strongest players — which still rely on FDIC loan guarantees and other emergency subsidies — to help weaker banks avoid paying another fee, he said.

“Lots of banks are going to require more capital, and (Bair is) trying to rob from the rich and give to the poor,” said Alpert, who supports the plan as a creative way to avoid another bailout.

Bankers and lobbyists strongly support the plan to have some big banks lend money to the fund, since it would help still-struggling institutions avoid another fee.

In a letter to Bair Monday, American Bankers Association CEO Ed Yingling endorsed borrowing from the industry or collecting regular premiums early as alternatives to charging another fee.

An earlier special fee already is having a negative economic impact, and another fee “may do more harm than good,” he said.

The FDIC may settle on a plan that combines two or more of the options being considered.

A spokesman for the agency did not respond to requests for comment Tuesday morning. The New York Times reported details of the possible bank lending plan earlier Tuesday.

The FDIC estimates bank failures will cost the fund around $70 billion through 2013. Ninety-four banks have failed so far this year. Hundreds more are expected to fall in coming years largely because of souring loans for commercial real estate.

The FDIC’s fund has slipped to 0.22 percent of insured deposits, below a congressionally mandated minimum of 1.15 percent. The $10.4 billion in the fund at the end of June is down from $13 billion at the end of March, and $45.2 billion in the second quarter of 2008.

Bair last week said the FDIC board would meet at the end of the month to consider options including taking Treasury funds, assessing fees on banks in advance and again increasing the fees they must pay.

“We don’t want to stress the industry too much at this time, when they’re still in the process of recovery,” she said.

Congress in May more than tripled the amount the FDIC could borrow from the Treasury if needed to restore the insurance fund, to $100 billion from $30 billion.

The FDIC then adopted a new system of special fees paid by U.S. financial institutions that shifted more of the burden to bigger banks to help replenish the insurance fund. The move cut by about two-thirds the amount of special fees to be levied on banks and thrifts compared with an earlier plan, which had prompted a wave of protests by small and community banks.

Bair had earlier promised a reduction in fees charged to banks if the Treasury credit line could be expanded.

The FDIC emergency premium, to be collected from all federally-insured institutions, is 5 cents for every $100 of a bank’s assets minus its so-called Tier 1, or regulatory capital, as of June 30. Banks and thrifts paid an average premium of 6.3 cents last year. A measure of a bank’s health, Tier 1 capital includes common and preferred stock as well as intangible assets such as tax losses that can be used to reduce future earnings.

In addition, the FDIC raised the regular insurance premiums for banks to between 12 and 16 cents for every $100 in deposits starting in April, from a range of 12 to 14 cents.

           — Hat tip: Lurker from Tulsa [Return to headlines]



Italy: Jobless Figure Rises as Recession Worsens

Rome, 22 Sept. (AKI) — Italy’s unemployment rate rose to 7.4 percent in the second quarter of 2009, its highest level since 2005. The country’s national statistics office ISTAT said on Tuesday employment fell sharply as the worsening recession affected the labour market.

The seasonally-adjusted unemployment rate rose to 7.4 percent from 7.3 percent in the previous three months to hit its highest level since the fourth quarter of 2005.

At least 378,000 jobs were lost in Europe’s fourth-largest economy, which recorded a 1.6 percent decline in the employment rate compared to 2008.

The number of unemployed rose to 1.18 million from 1.7 million a year earlier as the country failed to recover from the worst recession since World War II.

The worst job losses were recorded predominantly in the less developed south of the country where 71 percent of the 378,000 total job losses were recorded.

Unemployment in the south is now at 12 percent, compared to 6.7 percent in central Italy and 5.0 percent in the north.

The country’s employment rate thus now stands at 57.9 percent compared to 59.2 percent posted in the second quarter of 2008.

           — Hat tip: C. Cantoni [Return to headlines]

USA


A Casino Coming to Your Neighborhood?

According to a Wall Street Journal article, the Obama administration, ever eager to expand government revenues, is considering changing existing federal parameters for tribal casino gambling. Both cash-strapped tribes and government entities view casinos as money sources, usually ignoring both economic facts and sociological “collateral damage.”

While current restrictions require that casinos be built on or within “commuting distance” of actual reservation lands (note — on any land that the tribe can lease or purchase!), a push is on to allow them to build anywhere, including your downtown.

The primary rationale of expanding casino gambling on and off tribal reservations to create economic benefit for tribes and state governments has proven to be a pipe dream. The moral, criminal and family-related issues aside, it simply and literally does not add up.

Professor John Warren Kindt, professor of business administration at the University of Illinois and the foremost researcher on the economic impact of gambling, has proven for years that the direct costs of casino expansion outweigh any revenue increases by a two-to-one margin.

[…]

We know that building casinos in towns and cities where they have not previously existed has catastrophic impact on the most vulnerable in those communities. EVERY category of crime increases, as illustrated in a comprehensive study done by economists Earl Grinols and David Mustard:

“We show that casinos increased crime after a lag of three to four years, consistent with the theoretical predictions of the role of problem and pathological gamblers. Furthermore, by studying the crime rates in counties that border casino host counties we show that the data suggest casinos create crime, and not merely move it from one area to another: Neighbor county data indicate that casino crime spills over into border areas rather than is moved from them.”

Burglaries, robberies, white-collar crime, divorce and numerous other crimes and social pathologies escalate as part of the natural increase of families impacted by gambling addiction. The National Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs’ studies regularly confirm this dark reality. In addition, the corruption spawned by greed and organized crime impacts businesses and government at every level as many flies swarm to the honey.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



Another Obama Program Caught in Undercover Sting

‘Milk it, baby — It’s free money’

[Comments: An insider’s view of the program.]

While President Obama delivers speeches praising the alleged success of Cash for Clunkers, a former rebate processor for the federal program — also working undercover for WND — is calling it “complete chaos.”

[…]

Willey said she was the only non-minority applicant in the room. While human resources required a strict dress code for the position, she said she was shocked by the clothing and conduct of other candidates who were interviewed:

I was the only one dressed for a job interview. Everyone else had on jeans and T-shirts. Most women wore flip-flops. One woman was barefoot. The women were dressed extremely unprofessionally, in jeans and very revealing tops. A lot of them wore T-shirts that barely covered their stomachs. What I noticed most were the foul mouths of everyone around me.

The next day, Willey reported that as many as 300 new employees attended orientation for new positions with Vangent.

“One of the first things we were told was that Cash for Clunkers will help the environment,” she said.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



Austria in the ‘30s: Mirror to America

In the past weeks you’ve heard me talk about the How to Take Back America Conference being held in St. Louis this Friday, Sept. 25, and Saturday, Sept. 26, with speakers like: Gov. Mike Huckabee, “Joe the Plumber,” U.S. Reps. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., Trent Franks, R-Ariz., Steve King, R-Iowa, Tom McClintock, R-Calif., Dr. Tom Price, R-Ga., and Three-Star Gen. Jerry Boykin. But someone who’ll be there that you didn’t hear about is Kitty Werthmann. Kitty was 12 years old when Adolf Hitler was elected fuhrer of Austria.

She is 83 with a “vivid memory” of what happened in her homeland next. She witnessed the government take over the banks and the auto industry. Sound familiar? In the last nine months, Obama and the Democrats in Congress have successfully orchestrated the government takeover of Chrysler and General Motors along with countless banks.

She witnessed the “compulsory youth” service and indoctrination. That sounds a little like Obama’s call for “mandatory volunteerism” for America’s youth.

The government takeover of the schools immediately replaced crucifixes with pictures of Hitler and Nazi flags. “All religious instruction was replaced with physical education,” said Werthmann. No prayer was allowed. That all happened here decades ago. It is interesting, however, that Obama’s speech to the captive audience in the government schools — complete with the essay assignment about how students could help him achieve his political goals — was replaced once the American people got wind of it. And speaking of government control of education, if the Senate agrees, all student loans will be government issued, according to a bill that passed the House last week.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



‘Drunk Boris Yeltsin Tried to Hail Taxi Outside White House in Underpants’

Boris Yeltsin got so drunk during a presidential visit to Washington that he was found standing outside the White House in his underpants, trying to hail a taxi so he could go out for a pizza.

The following night, a guard mistook him for an intruder after the former Russian president was discovered stumbling drunkenly around the basement of the official visitor’s residence.

The embarrassing details about the extent of Mr Yeltsin’s drinking habits have been revealed by Bill Clinton.

Crete hails woman accused of setting fire to British tourist’s genitals using SambukaThe former US president made the disclosures to Taylor Branch, a writer and former flatmate, whom he invited to compile a new “oral history” of the presidency based on 79 taped interviews.

Mr Clinton, who would regularly summon Mr Branch for afternoon chats during his eight-year presidency, was more coy about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, merely saying that he “just cracked” under personal and political pressure.

According to excerpts in USA Today of Branch’s new book, the 707-page The Clinton Tapes: Wrestling History With the President, Mr Clinton kept the tapes of the interview hidden in his sock drawer.

Mr Branch, however, would make his own tape after each interview in which he would immediately record what Mr Clinton had told him.

Another excerpt relates how Mr Clinton had an argument with Al Gore, his vice president, shortly after the latter failed to win the presidency in 2000.

Mr Clinton complained that he could have won the election for him if he had been more involved, to which Mr Gore responded that the former president had been a “drag” on his ticket because of the Lewinsky affair.

The pair then “exploded” at each other, blaming each other for the Democratic defeat in a two-hour argument, according to the book.

Mr Yeltsin was reportedly staying at Blair House, the White House guest residence, in 1995 when the Secret Service discovered him standing alone and barely clothed on Pennsylvania Avenue.

The president, who died two years ago, told them in slurring words that he wanted a pizza, wrote Mr Branch.

The writer said it wasn’t always easy to keep Mr Clinton to the point.

On one occasion, the president made them interrupt their discussion of matters of state to help his daughter, Chelsea, finish an English literature essay about Dr Frankenstein.

Mr Branch said he sent his book to Mr Clinton to proof-read but he did not ask for any changes.

[Return to headlines]



Get Ready! Here Come the Energy Police

‘Google PowerMeter’ could mean regulation of your private home

Google is developing an Internet-based power monitor designed to monitor energy usage inside homes. As a result, the meter will provide utilities and any government regulators access to data on a household’s energy footprint and carbon footprint, Jerome Corsi’s Red Alert reports.

“Get ready,” Corsi warned. “Here come the energy police.”

Named the “Google PowerMeter,” the software is intended to measure the precise amount of energy a house consumes and provide an accounting that lists by household location and device that consumes the electricity.

“An easy next step would be for government regulators to demand more household energy efficiency or a reduction in carbon emissions,” Corsi wrote. “‘Energy offenders’ could be charged substantial fines, with the possibility that the truly recalcitrant could be deemed ‘energy criminals’ subject to severe consequences.”

He noted, “As always, government extermination of civil liberties first arrives with a helping hand.”

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



Islamic Rally on Capitol Clouded by Organizer’s Terror Ties

As 50,000 Muslims prepare for D.C., leader’s history called into question

As an anticipated 50,000 Muslims prepare to descend on Capitol Hill for “A Day of Islamic Unity” this Friday, several blogs and online news sources have spotlighted the history of the movement’s leader and his ties to terrorists in the U.S.

As WND reported, one of the key organizers is Hassen Abdellah, an attorney from Elizabeth, N.J. Abdellah formed part of the legal team that defended four men in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, including Mahmud Abouhalim, who was convicted and sentenced to prison.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



Killing Granny

A virulent moral blindness has seized hold of a substantial slice of America’s educated elite. Convinced they know better, they argue for a shallow, illogical, and horrifying vision of people as disposable.

I was wrong last week when I declared that Newsweek’s cover showing a baby next to a headline declaring that we’re all born racist was evidence that the mainstream media had hit bottom and destroyed itself. It was intellectual arrogance on my part that led me to underestimate the determination of Newsweek’s editors to find new deeper bottoms to hit.

This week’s Newsweek cover exceeds the sheer breathtaking ugliness of last week’s cover: “The Case for Killing Granny.” Alongside a photo of an electrical plug. The cover story is penned by Evan Thomas, (Andover, Harvard, Virginia Law), currently teaching at Princeton, alongside Peter Singer, who believes newborn infants can be killed because they lack “rationality, autonomy, and self-consciousness” and thus don’t qualify for personhood.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



‘Nut’-House Empire

ACORN grabs up $50M in city homes

ACORN has quietly become one of the Big Apple’s biggest owners of low- and moderate-income housing, amassing a real-estate empire worth at least $50 million, The Post has learned.

New York ACORN and a tangled web of affiliates own or manage nearly 1,500 housing units across three boroughs and draw in an estimated $5.7 million in rents, fees and profits from sales.

The properties are controlled by an opaque collection of nonprofits, holding companies and development funds. Many have generic names, like the 385 Palmetto Street Housing Development Fund or the Mutual Housing Association of New York, leaving no clue of their ties to the national ACORN conglomerate.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



Steven Chu: Americans Are Like ‘Teenage Kids’ When it Comes to Energy

When it comes to greenhouse-gas emissions, Energy Secretary Steven Chu sees Americans as unruly teenagers and the Administration as the parent that will have to teach them a few lessons.

Speaking on the sidelines of a smart grid conference in Washington, Dr. Chu said he didn’t think average folks had the know-how or will to to change their behavior enough to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions.

“The American public…just like your teenage kids, aren’t acting in a way that they should act,” Dr. Chu said. “The American public has to really understand in their core how important this issue is.” (In that case, the Energy Department has a few renegade teens of its own.)

The administration aims to teach them—literally. The Environmental Protection Agency is focusing on real children. Partnering with the Parent Teacher Organization, the agency earlier this month launched a cross-country tour of 6,000 schools to teach students about climate change and energy efficiency.

“We’re showing people across the country how energy efficiency can be part of what they do every day,” said EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson. “Confronting climate change, saving money on our utility bills, and reducing our use of heavily-polluting energy can be as easy as making a few small changes.”

Still, Secretary Chu said he didn’t think that the public would throw the same political temper tantrum over climate legislation has has happened with the healthcare debate.

Asked if he expected a town-hall style pushback, Dr. Chu said he was optimistic the public would buy the administration’s arguments that energy efficiency and caps on greenhouse-gas emissions will spark an economic rebound.

“I don’t think so…maybe I’m optimistic, but there’s very little debate” that a new green energy economy will bring economic prosperity, Mr. Chu told reporters.

Don’t look now, but there’s actually quite a lot of debate as to the economic merits of the new green-energy economy. Whether that will spell a healthcare-style revolt against the energy and climate bill stewing in the Senate is another question.

An update: Energy Department spokesman Dan Leistikow added: “Secretary Chu was not comparing the public to teenagers. He was saying that we need to educate teenagers about ways to save energy. He also recognized the need to educate the broader public about how important clean energy industries are to our competitive position in the global economy. He believes public officials do have an obligation to make their case to the American people on major legislation, and that’s what he’s doing.”

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]



Sunstein Picked for Sharing Obama’s Radical Views?

Comments echo president’s argument for ‘redistributive change’

Was President Obama’s newly confirmed regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, chosen because he holds radical positions that mirror some of Obama’s own personal views?

WND last week exposed Sunstein argued it is “desirable” to redistribute America’s wealth to poorer nations.

The comments seem eerily similar to a 2001 radio interview that surfaced on the Internet during last year’s presidential campaign in which Obama is heard promoting “major redistributive change.”

In the interview, Obama doubted whether redistribution of wealth could be brought about by the U.S. court system. He did not propose another mechanism for such radical change.

However, as WND reported, Sunstein, the new White House regulatory czar, proposed interpretation of federal laws be made not by judges but by the beliefs and commitments of the U.S. president and those around him.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



The Globo Threatens National Sovereignty

Look for your neighborhood ATM to spit out Globos, not dollars, if the United Nations has its way.

Many Americans will be stunned to learn that the United Nations has called for a single, global currency. Similar mumbles have been made by Russia, China and India. Russian president Dimtry Medvedev tossed a prototype “united future world currency” to leaders at this summer’s G-8 meeting in Italy. The supranational coin bore the motto “Unity in diversity.” Though economists agree such a prospect is at least a decade away, Americans have an opportunity to think deeply about the relationship of national sovereignty and national currency.

[…]

It is naive to assume that the Globo will be immune to political manipulation or corruption. Once mandatory monetary policy is set from outside, how independent is any nation? It is a nearly inhuman feat to design a means to regulate regulators such that they cannot favor one industrial nation over another. If a single global authority controls world economic policy, there is little to prevent the use of that sweeping authority to achieve political power and ideological control over our citizens. Imagine a nation’s fiscal future held hostage to compliance with the Kyoto Protocols or submission to the U.N.’s vision for the Global Commons? In fact, the report outlined this specific strategy in the section on climate change. “Emissions regulation and control have to be made more stringent” to achieve the U.N.’s vision of good growth. Furthermore, “climate-friendly” efforts must not be “left to market forces alone; they also require strong and internationally coordinated government action,” including a reduction of emissions achieved by “strict regulations.” National sovereignty will have little meaning when a nation is shackled by monetary control from beyond its borders.

[…]

The recent wrangling over the Euro is a lesson in the currency-sovereignty relationship. Some governments and their citizens are unwilling to shelve their national currency in exchange for imagined stability and efficiency. The Euro, as a regional currency, has not been an equally felicitous arrangement for all. It’s not unforeseen that nations would be censored culturally as well. Some Latin nations were “softly” bribed by the World Bank and IMF to institute national birth control policies as part of development loan packages. The bribe took the form of partial debt forgiveness when nations met specified goals.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



U.S. Charges Obama Fund-Raiser in $290 Million Fraud

NEW YORK (Reuters) — Hassan Nemazee, a fund-raiser for Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and other Democrats, has been indicted for defrauding Bank of America, HSBC and Citigroup Inc out of more than $290 million in loan proceeds, U.S. prosecutors said on Monday.

The announcement follows last month’s indictment of Nemazee, head of a private equity firm and an Iranian American Political Action Committee board member, on one count of defrauding Citigroup’s Citibank.

The new indictment adds allegations that he defrauded two other banks, Bank of America and HSBC Bank USA, in a similar fashion by falsifying documents and signatures to purportedly show he had hundreds of millions worth of collateral.

The office of the U.S. Attorney in Manhattan and the FBI said he used the proceeds of his scheme to make donations to election campaigns of federal, state and local candidates, donations to political action committees and charities.

He bought property in Italy and paid for maintenance on two properties in New York.

His lawyer could not immediately be reached for comment.

As of August 2009 Nemazee owed Bank of America about $142 million and owed Citibank about $74.9 million, the indictment said. He drew on a line of credit he fraudulently obtained from HSBC to pay the Citibank loan.

Nemazee, 59, typically donates more than $100,000 annually to Democratic political candidates. He is listed as one of the top “bundlers” of contributions to Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign, according to OpenSecrets.org, a website run by the Center for Responsive Politics research group.

“For more than 10 years, Hassan Nemazee projected the illusion of wealth, stealing more than $290 million so that he could lead a lavish lifestyle and play the part of heavyweight political fundraiser,” United States Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan said in a statement.

Nemazee was arrested at Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey on August 23 as he was checking in for a flight to Italy, according to court papers. He was released on bail.

If convicted on three counts of bank fraud, Nemazee faces up to 30 years in prison and millions of dollars in fines. He is also charged with identity theft.

The case is: U.S. v. Nemazee, 09-mj-1927 in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Manhattan)

           — Hat tip: AP [Return to headlines]



Vatican Official: Church Erred in Holding Kennedy Funeral

The tug-of-war over Ted Kennedy’s soul seems to be eternal.

In a speech last Friday night to a gathering of Catholic conservatives at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, an outspoken American archbishop now heading the Vatican version of the church’s Supreme Court said that politicians who support gay marriage or abortion rights cannot receive sacraments without publicly repenting their ways:

“It is not possible to be a practicing Catholic and to conduct oneself in this manner,” said Archbishop Raymond L. Burke, whom the pope transferred to Rome in 2008 after Burke’s often-stormy tenure as archbishop of St. Louis.

“Neither Holy Communion nor funeral rites should be administered to such politicians,” Burke said. “To deny these is not a judgment of the soul, but a recognition of the scandal and its effects.”

The remarks come from an account of the 50-minute speech by Deal Hudson, director of InsideCatholic.com, a conservative Web site that hosted the Sept. 18 annual gala for some 200 supporters. (Among them: American Enterprise Institute President Arthur Brooks, the National Review’s Kate O’Bierne, and Ed Whelan, head of the Ethics and Public Policy Center.) Hudson was an adviser to the Bush White House on Catholic issues.

Burke’s blast is not exactly a surprise, given his track record of sharp criticism of pro-choice Catholic politicians — he has said they should be barred from taking Communion and has encouraged ministers who distribute the Eucharist to withhold it on their own initiative. Burke has not been shy about exhorting fellow bishops he sees as too lenient, either, as he did in this March interview with Operation Rescue’s Randall Terry. (Burke later regretted that Terry had aired the videotape.) And he is a favorite speaker of Beltway conservatives, having given the keynote at last May’s National Catholic Prayer Breakfast.

But for Burke, now a prominent official in the Vatican’s judicial system, to — in effect — openly oppose the judgment of Boston’s Cardinal Sean O’Malley (and most other bishops) regarding sacraments for Kennedy and other Catholic pols, and to, in effect, give aid and comfort to a Catholic right that has stepped up criticism of the hierarchy to fierce levels, is remarkable. Burke did not just say that politicians like Kennedy should not be provided a private funeral; he advocates denying them a funeral Mass at all.

Cardinal O’Malley earlier this month rejected that course of action “in the strongest terms,” as he wrote in a blog post that was an unusually blunt response to critics of his decision to allow Kennedy a funeral Mass and to preside at it:

“We will stop the practice of abortion by changing the law, and we will be successful in changing the law if we change people’s hearts. We will not change hearts by turning away from people in their time of need and when they are experiencing grief and loss,” O’Malley wrote.

“At times, even in the Church, zeal can lead people to issue harsh judgments and impute the worst motives to one another. These attitudes and practices do irreparable damage to the communion of the Church.”

In his well-received speech last Friday — the standing ovation lasted seven minutes — Burke rejected such an approach.

“We should have the courage to look truth in the eye and call things by their common names.” He added that for a politician who support abortion rights and gay rights, for example, to return to the sacraments, “his repentance must also be public.”

Burke also rejected concerns that speaking out as he has is fomenting divisions within the church, and at the highest levels.

“The Church’s unity is founded on speaking the truth in love. This does not destroy unity but helps to repair a breach in the life of the Church.”

Still, Pope Benedict XVI’s exchange of letters with Kennedy seemed to indicate a pastoral concern for the dying senator that contrasts with Burke’s approach, and few bishops — from Rome to Boston — believed Kennedy should have been denied a funeral.

With the apparent push-back on health care reform from the Catholic center (and the right, of course; Burke also decried Obamacare in his speech), it seems clear there is a struggle for dominance inside the Catholic hierarchy in America, and one that does not appear to be ending anytime soon.

           — Hat tip: Zenster [Return to headlines]

Europe and the EU


‘Dark-Haired’ Voters Become Focal Point of German Elections

BERLIN — Hürriyet Daily News

The influence of “dark-haired voters” in German politics will be stronger than ever as Sunday’s elections will likely result in a narrow victory, migrant representatives suggest.

Germany is counting down to the election of its federal parliament, called the Bundestag, on Sunday while political parties have sped up their campaigns to gain undecided voters. “German politicians, for the first time in history, are campaigning in an effort to gain migrants’ votes, or at least, not to alienate them. It is remarkable that they don’t play on Turkey’s EU membership bid or integration problems,” Özcan Mutlu, a candidate for Berlin from the Green Party, told Hürriyet Daily News & Economic Review.

Of the two partners of Germany’s grand coalition — Chancellor Angela Merkel and her challenger Frank-Walter Steinmeier — neither has seemed to pull off a decisive win. “A narrow election victory is expected so they don’t want to anger the Turkish community,” Mutlu said. “This time, almost all the parties included Turkish names in their list.”

Christian Democrats Union, or CDU, leader Merkel wants to create a center-right coalition with the liberal, business-friendly Free Democrats, or FDP, while Social Democrat Party, or SDP, leader Steinmeier seeks an option with the Green Party. Although the Left Party has attracted a significant chunk of voters away from the SDP in recent years, it will likely stay at the opposition due to its radical line.

“The dark-haired voters will show themselves. The Turkish community is the majority of the up to 5 million migrants in Germany, and it is a great chance to voice their basic demands related to integration,” said Safter Çinar, spokesman for the Turkish Association in Berlin.

Following a roundtable meeting with representatives from five political parties, Çinar sounded doubtful about a “pro-immigrant shift” in German politics. “There is no evolution in their minds. For example, the CDU firmly rejects our main demands, such as double citizenship and local election rights for long-term residents,” he said. “They are also not supportive of mother-tongue education rights.”

Approximately 700,000 to 800,000 Turkish-origin voters are expected to cast their ballots and a number of Turkish politicians from different parties have been running in the elections, which is scheduled for Sept. 27.

“I believe that the Turkish community is excited for the elections as they had to struggle to gain this right,” Mutlu said.

“Socialists grow stronger as migrants gain ground,” said Bekir Alboga of the Turkish Islamic Union, or DITIB, in Cologne.

Lale Akgün, whose family moved to Germany when she was 9, is running for the SDP in Cologne and called on the people to “use this historic chance to shape the future.” In a phone interview with the Daily News, Akgün said: “Merkel has introduced regulations to make a family union difficult. Without paying attention to the basic problems of migrants, a number of summits and roundtable meetings took place to deceive us. She will go further if she wins.

“Looking at the commitments in party programs, I feel the migrants have started to have more of an influence. I think they will either go with the Greens or the SDP,” Akgün said, adding that the Left Party could not become a coalition partner due to its radical line.

Sevim Dagdelen is another German politician of Turkish origin but says she finds that description “discriminatory.” “The Left Party is the only option for migrant rights because the Greens and the SDP are out of the question after their failure in the past,” Dagdelen told the Daily News. “People are looking for alternatives after being disappointed with the SDP and the Greens, who did not keep their promises.”

Calling on migrants to cast their ballots, Dagdelen said, “It is only way to prevent conservatives from getting stronger.”

Aydan Özoguz is a veteran Turkish-origin politician and has been campaigning for the SDP in Hamburg. Özoguz is hopeful for the election with increasing support as the day gets nearer. He defends the SDP, saying the party proved their capacity through the financial crisis. “The ministers of finance and labor have performed with remarkable success during the time of crisis. They are both from the SDP. Also, traditionally the SDP gains more votes toward election day,” she told the Daily News.

Confirming that migrant voters have become more effective during this election, she said: “The SDP, Greens and even liberal Free Democrats have been paying more attention to migrant-related issues. We are rethinking double citizenship, for example. We are also defending that long-time residents can vote in the local elections even if they are not citizens.”

Some 80 out of 100 Turkish-origin deputies in both the federal and state-level parliaments have set up a network to voice migrant-related problems, although they are members of different political parties. Their next appointment is with President Horst Koehler in October.

           — Hat tip: C. Cantoni [Return to headlines]



Ireland: ‘No’ Side Are More Committed — Ganley

THE result of the second referendum on the Lisbon Treaty hangs in the balance because ‘No’ voters are more committed, Libertas campaigner Declan Ganley claimed yesterday.

Mr Ganley said ‘No’ voters were “more committed and more informed”, and therefore more likely to vote.

He thus suggested that some of the ‘Yes’ lead showing up in opinion polls was likely to be a soft vote that would not turn out on the day.

“I’m absolutely sure it can be won (by the ‘No’ side),” Mr Ganley said. “I am confident it can. It would be a win for Ireland, and for Europe, if there is a ‘No’ victory.

“The ‘No’ voter is a more committed voter. They are a more informed voter, because they know it is not about the economy or about jobs, or about whether we are in Europe and will get money from the ECB.

“The ‘No’ voters know that, and some people that voted ‘Yes’ last time are going to be shifting their vote this time. I know, because I have met them.”

Mr Ganley was speaking after dropping off a copy of the treaty with a highlighter pen to Fine Gael headquarters “because we would like them to show where the jobs are”.

[Return to headlines]



Ireland: Blow to ‘Yes’ Bid as Church Refuses to Take Sides

THE Catholic Church last night dealt a blow to Government hopes of its outright support for the Lisbon Treaty.

The hierarchy has decided not to align themselves for or against the treaty, but assured Catholics that they are free in conscience to vote ‘Yes’ or ‘No’.

This neutrality was expressed in a brief statement issued last night after a meeting in Maynooth of the standing committee of the Irish Bishops’ Conference.

While condemning “misleading and incorrect claims” in the referendum campaign, the bishops resisted growing public pressure to censure by name the monthly Catholic freesheet newspaper ‘Alive’ which has promoted rabidly anti-Lisbon views at church porches.

Nor did the bishops issue a forthright condemnation by name of the extreme Catholic lay group Coir, which has persisted in claiming that the Lisbon Treaty will introduce abortion in Ireland.

But they warned that “any material which misinforms voters is an interference with the exercise of a fundamental right and has no place in church buildings or grounds”.

The statement falls far short of a declaration made last week to the Oireachtas Europe committee by the Bishop of Down and Connor, Noel Treanor, in which he strongly advocated approval for the Lisbon Treaty.

Bishop Treanor stated unequivocally that a Catholic could, without reserve and in good conscience, vote ‘Yes’ for the treaty. He went as far as saying that there were no grounds to justify a ‘No’ vote on the basis of specifically religious or ethical concerns.

Last November Cardinal Sean Brady made it clear to the same Oireachtas committee that “a committed Catholic, even before the current legal guarantees had been secured, could vote in favour of the Lisbon Treaty”.

These comments, as well as strong pro-European addresses by the Archbishop of Dublin Diarmuid Martin, had raised expectations in political and business circles that the bishops would come out in support of the treaty, rather than reaffirm their neutrality in the first referendum last year.

Importance

In the new statement, ‘Values Matter’, the bishops recognise that the Lisbon Treaty is of the greatest importance, not only for Ireland but also for the future of the European project.

But they say that although the situation has changed since the June 2008 referendum with the addition of legal assurances on abortion and other ethical issues in response to the worries expressed at that time, their 2008 pastoral reflection, ‘Fostering a Community of Values’, remains relevant.

“In it we highlighted the distinctive roles of politics and religion,” the bishops said.

“While we do not seek to align ourselves with either side of the referendum debate, we wish to make it clear that a Catholic can, in good conscience, vote ‘Yes’ or ‘No’.”

[Return to headlines]



Ireland: We Are Parasites. We Moralised, Postured, And Lectured as We Received Billions in Aid From EU

By Kevin MyersI hadn’t expected so many of the No-to-Lisbon crowd to have been so personally vituperative and sneering in their reaction to my change of mind on the forthcoming Lisbon referendum.Intellectual ‘No’ voters, I thought, (and wrongly, it seems) were the calm deliberative type who would understand why I had decided that a ‘No’ vote would be both unproductive and a political idiocy. Both categories of my argument are based on the nature of the Irish state, and the people therein.Frankly, we are parasites. We moralised and postured and lectured, even, as we received billions in aid from the EU.We have lived within the NATO shield for 60 years, have never contributed a penny to our own defence, yet have endlessly indulged in an interior discourse about our “neutrality” and the “immorality” of the foreign arms industry. Moralising sanctimony fills our public life.An RAF container is spotted at Shannon and the media passes into a paroxysm of self-righteousness, though the moment we have an air-sea rescue crisis off our Atlantic seaboard the first people we call in are the RAF.Yes, yes, yes, technically the veto to Lisbon is within our legal powers. And yes, the proposed EU constitution has the clarity of a Tokyo phonebook in Braille for people with burnt hands.But, firstly, we are political debtors to the EU magisterium; and secondly, there is always a penalty for exercising one’s rights.Not merely must one shoulder one’s own responsibilities within a society, but one must also then take responsibility for one’s own actions.If we block the EU momentum, then we must answer to the political forces that we are obstructing: we, who as a state, have almost never done anything for anyone.For no one owes us anything. No one in Europe can say: yes, you sent in combat troops to fight the Nazis or to guard Germany or Norway against the communist threat.The Turks stood fast on the southern-eastern flanks of NATO against the Soviet empire. We did nothing to guard its western approaches. When we might have been expected to be manly, and to have paid the price for freedom — as the Turks certainly did — we indulged our own almost bottomless capacity for a self-deceiving moral superiority which we called neutrality.We might have deceived ourselves; but we deceived no one in Europe. However, the Brussellistas are a patient and cynical folk. They’ve come to terms with many kinds of quirky identities on the margins of mainstream Europe: Sicilians and Faroese and Ulster-Scots and Bretons.However, the marginal identity of the Irish also had a vote in the EU. So be it.But we should not push the power of that vote too far, especially since much of the ‘No’ vote in the last referendum on Lisbon was of the most infantile, contemptible, degrading variety — as in ‘if we vote Yes, we’ll lose our precious neutrality, and will be voting yes to a European Army and conscription’.Bah!This is foreign affairs as it is taught at the shrine at Knock: the Irish are a holy and peace-loving people, who are against military alliances of any kind.In other words, we’re the classroom goody-goody who says the rosary loudest, and genuflects most conspicuously, and then calls on God to intervene when the school is on fire. We’re not the impious and irreligious classmate who kicks down the schoolroom door and drags out the burning children, and gets burnt in the process.(Because, remember, we’re neutral).The Brits, on the other hand, really can vote ‘No’ for they have the moral and historical gravitas to be able to say ‘sorry, chaps, but we don’t like the way this Euro-thingummy is going: too centrist, too unaccountable, too legalist, too arrogant and altogether too Holy Roman Empirish’.For that’s the dividend that the British can draw upon for all the blood and treasure that they spent on holding out against totalitarianism for the 50 years between 1939 and 1989. Yes, the French might well dream of creating a new Greater Rhenish empire for themselves. But as a political and military power in world affairs, a Germano-French alliance with Italic-Iberian allies would be about as substantive and awesome as an Argentinian-Brazilian axis. Neither China nor Russia would worry for a single second about an EU dressed up in Rhenish military garb — not now, not ever.And the idea that Ireland alone can lead the internal dissidents of Europe against such a eurostate is rather like expecting the Isle of Man to be in the forefront of resistance to Hitler.So it really doesn’t matter whether the EU is heading in the wrong direction, as I firmly believe it is. The political reality is that we’re merely a lifeboat on a davit on SS Europa: we must go wherever the ship, with its incomprehensible and possibly toxic constitution, is taking us. I just hope that when the EU founders on the rocks of history, as it will, I shall not be around to see it. And if you really want your children to grow up within a rock-sure European civilisation, then emigrate to the USA — the first, last, and best hope of mankind.

[Return to headlines]



Ireland’s National Sovereignty Under Threat

OPINION: I AM astonished at how advocates for the Lisbon Treaty, rather than deal with real concerns about the treaty, frequently resort to slinging insults at their opponents. So far I have found myself on the receiving end of abuse such as “nitwit”, “mad ayatollah” and “unemployable f***ing head banger”, writes ROBERT BALLAGH

However, I must admit that the last thing I expected was that The Irish Times would publish an entire opinion piece labelling me a hypocrite.

Sarah Carey’s allegation seems to be based on the notion, commonly held by many on the Yes side, that if you are against the Lisbon Treaty then you must be against the European Union and all its works and pomps!

This is nonsense. Let me make my current position quite clear.

While I am vehemently opposed to the Lisbon Treaty, I am not, nor have I ever been, opposed to Ireland’s membership of the European Union and certainly I am not, nor have I ever been, opposed to Irish citizens vindicating their rights through European legislation. Simply put, I am against this treaty, not against the European Union.

In seeking to bolster her personal attack, Sarah Carey accuses me of opposing a succession of EU treaties. This is simply untrue!

The first EU treaty that I have ever campaigned against is the Lisbon Treaty, and my reason for taking this stand is that I believe that Lisbon is simply a step too far.

I am convinced that if Lisbon is ratified Irish democracy and Irish sovereignty will be irreparably damaged.

Interestingly enough, Sarah Carey agrees with me on this issue, but admits that she does not care.

Even the mildly curious must wonder what it is about the Lisbon Treaty that causes the European establishment to lose all sense of proportion in its frantic efforts to keep this unloved treaty alive.

I, for one, am unable to detect any adequate explanation in much of the old guff we heard during the last campaign about a “better Europe” or a “more efficient Europe”.

In truth, none of this stuff can account for their readiness to set aside all legal and democratic constraints in their ruthless defence of this treaty. No, I believe there must be an alternative explanation.

During the course of the last referendum campaign the phrase “an unprecedented grab for power” surfaced a few times as a description of the Lisbon Treaty, but, unfortunately, at the time, no one really developed this proposition.

Nonetheless, I believe that it provides us with a hint as to why the European elites are so determined to force through this treaty, come what may.

One argument frequently raised by some on the Yes side suggests that the Lisbon Treaty is “no big deal”, that it is simply a gathering together of previous treaties and, as a consequence, represents nothing more than a modest reform package.

I’m afraid nothing could be further from the truth.

Make no mistake about it, the Lisbon Treaty is a truly radical, even revolutionary, document.

To understand this one needs to appreciate that what we call the European Union today is not a state. It is not even a legal or corporate entity in its own right.

However, if Lisbon is ratified all this will change. In strictly legal terms, an entirely new European Union will be established. This will be a union in the constitutional form of a European federal state.

The current European Union will cease to exist and will be replaced by this legally new European Union which will be separate from and superior to its member states, just as the USA is separate from and superior to say, Kansas or Louisiana.

By transforming the legal character of the union, the Lisbon Treaty will transform the meaning of union citizenship.

Presently, each and every one of us is, first and foremost, a citizen of our own country, in our case Ireland, and in strictly legal terms, any individual relationship with the EU amounts to no more than having a purple cover on our passport.

However, if Lisbon is ratified, all this will change. Under the treaty regulations, every Irish person will become, firstly, a citizen of the European Union and secondly an Irish citizen.

This is new and represents a radical shift in the relationship between the individual citizen and the European Union.

For example, the duty of obedience to the union’s laws and loyalty to the union’s institutions attaching to this citizenship will be superior to those attaching to the citizenship of one’s own country, and even though member states will retain their own national constitutions, these will be subordinate to the new union treaty regulations.

As such they will no longer be constitutions of sovereign states in their own right, but instead, will resemble, the constitutions of various states in the USA, which, of course, are subordinate to the federal US constitution.

Make no mistake about it, if the Lisbon Treaty is ratified, then, a sovereign independent Irish nation will cease to exist.

The dream of “the right of the people of Ireland to the ownership of Ireland and to the unfettered control of Irish destinies” was what fuelled the centuries of struggle carried out by Theobold Wolfe Tone, Robert Emmet, Patrick Pearse and James Connolly.

The loss of national sovereignty implicit in the Lisbon Treaty will represent nothing less than a renunciation of those centuries of struggle.

[Return to headlines]



Italy-Slovenia: Berlusconi, Good Neighbours

(ANSAmed) — ROME, SEPTEMBER 18 — There are still “a few problems” between Italy and Slovenia which the two governments “are working on” in order to “maintain good relations and I believe that wéll resolve all existing small problems” said Silvio Berlusconi in a joint press conference in the Prime Minister’s office after his meeting with the premier of Slovenia, Borut Pahor. When introducing his guest, Berlusconi pointed out that this is Pahor’s first visit to Italy. The Italian premier added that he has “always had a good relation” with Pahor, “also because he speaks Italian: he’s been in Milan, he has told me about his experiences. He has studied an important television network” he added with a smile, “which happens to be Channel 5”. Berlusconi underlined the good personal relation he has with Pahor but also the political relation with the Slovenian leader: “We sit together at the table of the European Council and we always agree”. The two countries, he continued, have a “very good relation,” which becomes evident from the presence of more than 3,000 Italians in Slovenia and 30,000 Slovenians in Italy. “We both have a legislation which respects minority groups. There is much trade between our countries: we are Slovenia’s second partner after Germany both in imports and exports. There are a few problems we are working on and I believe wéll resolve all existing small problems”. The Balkan, and “in particular Kosovo, Albania and the Serbian citizens living in Kosovo” were also discussed in the meeting, Berlusconi explained. (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Italy: Premier and Fini Lunch to Mend Rift

Differences were threatening long- standing alliance

(ANSA) — Rome, September 21 — Premier Silvio Berlusconi and House Speaker Gianfranco Fini met on Monday in an apparent bid to iron out differences threatening their long-standing alliance.

Cabinet Undersecretary Gianni Letta, a seasoned political mediator and Berlusconi’s right-hand man, invited them to his house for lunch after they sat side-by-side at a state funeral for six Italian paratroopers killed in Afghanistan last week.

Northern League leader Umberto Bossi told reporters after the funeral that the two would heal the rift.

“Fini and Berlusconi will make peace,” said Bossi, who has himself been at odds with Fini over the Speaker’s new liberal-minded stances on a number of issues, including a living wills bill and voting rights for immigrants. Bossi brushed aside talk of political strife with the Speaker, saying that despite their spats they had “a good relationship” because “the positive thing about Fini is that he keeps his word”.

“He said something on immigration then said other things but I’m not worried: he keeps his word,” indicating that Fini would not stray from the centre-right alliance’s hard-line stance on immigration issues, including the controversial sea ‘push-backs’ to Libya. The Northern League is a strong supporter of Italy’s recent immigration crackdown, while Fini has stressed the importance of respecting asylum rights and proposed citizenship for legal immigrants.

Earlier this month, Bossi accused Fini of being “crazy”.

The speaker and his loyalists have in turn taken issue with the premier’s regular weekly consultations with Bossi, saying that the League leader was seeing Berlusconi more than his own party allies. One of Fini’s closest aides, the deputy House Whip for the People of Freedom (PdL) party, Italo Bocchini, said that Fini and Berlusconi would not part ways because over the last 15 years they had “changed the political scene in Italy”.

Bocchini said in fact the two would agree to cement their alliance by working together to give birth to a strengthened and “more structured PdL” which would guarantee the centre right a long string of future victories.

Speaking after the two-and-a-half hour meeting, Bocchini said “conditions had emerged” to ensure a continuing alliance between the two, political speak meaning that problems had been sorted out.

Berlusconi and Fini have been close allies since 1994, when the media magnate decided to step into politics, although Fini once formed a separate election alliance that did not win over voters.

Earlier this year Fini agreed to merge his National Alliance party with Berlusconi’s Forza Italia to form the PdL.

Fini, however, has repeatedly voiced displeasure with the way the PdL is run, calling for more democracy, and complaining that the premier is caving in to Bossi and the Northern League on a number of issues.

Last week, more than 50 ex-AN members of the PdL wrote a public letter to Berlusconi proposing a “permanent consultation pact” between the two PdL co-founders to prevent the party “short-circuiting” and fling open policy debate to all sides.

Fini has also come under repeated fire from Il Giornale, the Milan daily owned by Berlusconi’s brother Paolo and last week he decided to sue its editor, Vittorio Feltri.

Feltri has penned a number of front-page editorials, accusing Fini of “betraying” the PdL, of playing “comrade” to win support among centre left MPs for his political ambitions, warning him to change tack or leave and threatening to use a nine-year-old alleged sex dossier on AN.

The premier has said he has no control over Feltri and had no prior information on the editorials. Alessandro Campi, who heads Fini’s Farefuturo web magazine, said last week that Fini “will never abandon” Berlusconi nor “will he trip him up by setting up a new party”.

“Voters wouldn’t appreciate what, to all effects, would amount to a betrayal”.

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Obama’s Treachery in Eastern Europe

Obama would have us believe that the land-based missile shield is no longer needed because the facts and intelligence data have changed and currently show that Iran is “now further behind in their missile development than originally thought.”

Obama claims we have a new defense system that is “smarter, stronger and swifter,” but what he failed to tell us is how strapping a few short-range missiles to the deck of a ship is realistic protection for that region or America. He has cut the defense budget and scrapped defense programs and technology that were being developed that would have provided America with a military edge. He has capitulated to his left-wing extremist anti-war supporters, and now he has betrayed the trust and confidence of Eastern European leaders who jeopardized their personal well-being to support the planned missile shield.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



OECD: Italy: Productivity Could Increase by 10% With Reforms

(ANSAmed) — ROME, SEPTEMBER 21 — Reforms to the market leading to less regulation could result in a substantial increase in productivity, which could reach 10% in countries such as Italy, France, and Germany in a 10-year span, according to an OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) report on the EU economy. The report explained that “the potential earnings in terms of productivity from reforms to regulations are considerable”. The same report stated that Italian industries are forced to pay for the most expensive electricity prices out of all of their competitors in the OECD area, stressing that the price of electricity for businesses in Italy has reached 200 euros per megawatt/hour compared to just 40 euros paid by businesses in France. There is a huge gap between Italy and the country with the second most expensive electricity prices, Ireland, where local businesses pay less than 130 euros per megawatt/hour. Slovakia, Hungary, Austria, and the Czech Republic all pay over 100 euros, while in Europe, in addition to France, Norway and Austria also pay less than 50 euros per megawatt/hour. (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Spain: Even Bullfight Fans Against De La Vega Bull Death

(ANSAmed) — MADRID, SEPTEMBER 15 — Moscatel, a 540 kilo bull from the famous raiser of “corrida” bulls Victorino Martin, resisted for 30 minutes before succumbing to death in Tordesilla, in the province of Valladolid, skewered by the lance-blades of amateur “banderilleros”, who repeated a controversial tradition today in spite of the mobilisation of animal-rights groups, singers, the Parliamentary Association for the Defence of Animal Rights and even the Taurino Pacma party. The tradition, known as the “Toro de la Vega”, is one of the most controversial in that the bull is at the mercy of the blades that impede it from reaching the escape line, beyond which it would be saved. Even the Taurino, Pacma party demonstrated on Sunday against “the lynching of defenceless animals” with a march that began from the Plaza España in Madrid; while the singer of the group Celtas Cortos, Jesus Cifientes, led the demonstration in which thousands of people took part on Sunday in Valladolid. “Mistreatment of women is considered inadmissible everywhere, while kind eyes look on the mistreatment of animals like the ‘Toro de la Vega’, doing nothing to stop this bloody tradition”, the singer said in protest from the front of the demonstration. Moscatel joined the other 13,349 bulls and calves butchered in the 3,295 fights, ‘corridas’, races and taurine festivals that took place last year in Spain. Over 60,000 animals per year, according to the National Association for the Protection and Well-Being of Animals, are mistreated or killed in Spain as a part of what are called “cultural festivals”, defined by animal groups as “an aberration of morals”. (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Spain: Teacher Become Public Officers Against Bullies

(ANSAmed) — MADRID, SEPTEMBER 15 — School bullies and unruly classrooms, the high dropout rate and attacks on teachers, who spend one third of their day trying to bring students back in line, are some of the school problems which Esperanza Aguirre, chairman of the Madrid Community, has decided to deal with by giving greater authority to teachers in Madrid, who will be assimilated by law to public officers, so that any affront can become matter of criminal proceedings. During the debate on the state of the region, Aguirre announced that she will soon submit a regional draft law that will assign public authority’ to teachers in Madrid, the same that is granted to public officers, in order to give them “moral support” and a “status which they currently lack”. (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Supposedly Pacifistic Calls for a Withdrawal of German Troops From Afghanistan Raise Thea Dorn’s Hackles

“Pacifism aimed at feathering one’s own nest is a moral sleight of hand,” writes author Thea Dorn in response to the prominent German writers who demanded in Freitag a withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan (more here). She’s particularly incensed by philosopher Richard David Precht (in the Spiegel) and author Martin Walser (in the Zeit), who argue that the mission “negligently” endangers Germany’s security. “On of the one hand, the West as a whole is considered such a dubious culture, that we deny it the right to defend itself with force against those attacking it with out any scruples whatsoever. At the same time, we in Berlin, Cologne and on Lake Constance would like to be able to enjoy our red wine in peace. And I wonder why the current brand of pacifism is always flanked by its flipside, anti-Americanism. Precht, for example, characterises the American Way of Life as ‘the 20th century’s most successful weapon of mass destruction’.”

           — Hat tip: C. Cantoni [Return to headlines]



Terrorism: France/Italy Trade Northern Africa Information

(ANSAmed) — ROMA, SEPTEMBER 18 — Italy and France exchanged terrorism-related information, particularly focused on northern Africa and threats from that area which affect both nations, during a meeting between Italian and French chiefs of police that was held today in the Viminale (the Italian ministry of the Interior). Reportedly, the meeting analysed the results of recent collaboration between the police forces of the two countries on a major investigation which led to the arrest, last May, of two French nationals accused of international terrorism. Both wanted by the Belgian and French anti-terrorism units, the Imam of Belgium, Bassam Ayachi, and his collaborator, Raphael Gendrom, a French engineer converted to Islam, were arrested and charged with organising terrorist activities in Europe to support al Qaeda. The common goal of the French and Italian police forces is to boost cooperation and raise the level of collaboration against subversive threats. The meeting between Italian police chief Antonio Manganelli and his French counterpart Frederic Pechenard also focused on the fight against illegal immigration and the fight against drug trafficking out of North Africa.(ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



UK: Council Spends £100k of Public Money on Rebranding Museum… Only to Keep Original Name

A council was criticised today after it drafted in a team of top consultants to rebrand a museum in Bristol — and they came back with the idea of reusing its original name.

The project currently has the working title the Museum of Bristol, but when it opens in 2011 it will be called ‘M Shed’, the historic name of the harbourside building.

Residents today vented their fury at local reports the rebranding exercise reportedly cost £100,000. But Bristol City Council has so far not confirmed the cost.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



UK: Forgetful Patients to be Fitted With Microchips to Remind Them to Take Their Pills

Patients will be fitted with a microchip in their shoulder to remind them to take their medicine, under a new scheme being developed by a drugs company.

Older people will be given pills containing a harmless microchip that sends a signal to the chip in the shoulder when the pill is taken.

But if the pill is not taken by the forgetful patient, the chip in the shoulder will then send a text to a carer or the patient to remind them.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



UK: Father Arrested for Carrying Out Citizen’s Arrest on Yobs ‘Who Threw Apples at Him and His Wife’

When police failed to help after Roland Digby’s house was repeatedly pelted with apples by a gang of youths, the father-of-three tried to perform a citizen’s arrest.

But instead of the yobs, it is he who has been left facing court.

He was arrested and charged with common assault after allegedly placing his hand on a 16-year-old’s shoulder to restrain him.

The youth swore at him and a scuffle broke out, so Mr Digby put him in a ‘full-nelson’ behind-the-back armlock ‘to make sure he didn’t get away’.

About 15 other teenagers then joined the fray, which ended after several minutes when Mr Digby escaped with a ‘clipped lip’.

But despite four 999 calls no officers turned up to his house. When they did arrive five days later, it was Mr Digby that was arrested.

The courier driver, 49, said: ‘ People who stand up for their own rights face a criminal record, while the perpetrators get off. I am totally disgusted by this. The police have just hung me out to dry.

‘When I was young, if someone told you to disappear, you would, but now people say you can’t touch them or you’ll get in trouble.

‘I have lived in this town for 25 years and used to run an off-licence. I always complied with enforcing ID checks and I had a good relationship with the police.

‘They know me well but I am shocked by what has happened.’

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



UK: Jilted Student ‘Watched Beheadings and Terror Videos to Beef Himself Up Before Stabbing His Ex-Girlfriend’

A university student watched terrorist videos before smashing his way into the home of his ex-girlfriend and stabbing her in the back after she began a new relationship, a court heard today.

Barry Nason, 26, allegedly carried out the life-threatening attack after he discovered German student Birgit Massam had a new boyfriend.

The ‘jealous’ student watched video footage, including beheadings, terrorist training exercises and petrol bombings, to ‘beef himself up’ before dressing in an Army uniform and arming himself with an axe and a knife.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



UK: Most Rivers Fail to Meet Tough New EU Pollution Standards

Three out of four rivers in England and Wales have failed tough ecological tests introduced by the European Union.

Only five of the 6,114 rivers and their tributaries have reached the highest ranking for the overall quality of their eco-systems. Of these, four are in Northumberland — the Ridlees Burn, Barrow Burn Catchment, River Till and Linhope Burn — and the fifth is the river Caletwr in North Wales.

A total of 117, some 2 per cent of all rivers, were found to be the dirtiest and most inhospitable to marine, plant and invertebrate life. Among them is the Stour estuary in Kent, part of a nature reserve run by the RSPB.

But even famous chalkstream rivers such as the Test, a favourite stretch for anglers, is in trouble. Paul Knight, of the Salmon and Trout Association , said: “People may not think of the Test as failing because it is cleaner. But the new system of scoring rivers means that when you look at the ecology — the number of fish, plants, invertebrates and the tiniest bugs — it is not doing well. The main problems are linked to over-abstraction and lack of river flow and diffuse pollution from phosphorus from laundry detergents and nitrogen from pesticide run off from farmland.”

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]



UK: New US Ambassador Wants to Show America is Not a ‘Dumb’ Or ‘Bullying’ Power

Louis Susman, the new US ambassador to Britain, wants to improve the nation’s impressions of his country, insisting “we are not a dumb power, we are not a bullying power”.

Mr Susman, a fund-raiser for President Barack Obama’s campaign, said the US wanted to ditch the reputation as a controlling power and reach out to communities across the UK, including Muslim groups.

He added that he intends to “enhance and strengthen” the relationship between London and Washington, suggesting that Tony Blair’s subservience to the Bush administration during his time as Prime Minister was “unhealthy”.

In an interview with the Financial Times, his first with the media since taking up the post, Mr Susman, said: “We are not a dumb power, we are not a bullying power.

“We want to build partnerships, we want to listen, we want to consult, we want to co-operate, and that’s what I want to do.

“I think that there have been eight years of difficult times for America abroad and anybody who doesn’t agree with that isn’t looking at reality.”

Mr Susman said Mr Obama, and Gordon Brown got on well together and had been working closely on this week’s G20 summit in Pittsburgh.

He then added: “To compare it to the previous relationship [between Tony Blair and George W. Bush], well some people might say that relationship wasn’t healthy. Many people here in the UK didn’t think it was healthy because it was without questioning and [without] interaction.”

The release of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi, the Lockerbie bomber, appeared to damage relations with America after Mr Obama told Mr Brown he was disappointed by the extradition.

However, though reflecting that disappointment, Mr Susman said it would not get in the way of the “special relationship” Britain and the US share.

Mr Susman reflected that disappointment, by saying of the extradition: “We did not think it was appropriate, we told them we did not think it was appropriate, we continue to feel it was not appropriate and the British and Scottish governments know that.”

However, he added: “I think you have to look at the relationship in totality. We are an incredible partner for the UK in all our intelligence efforts, we are incredible partners in all of our military efforts. It’s almost seamless how well the two countries work together and I have seen that first hand. So when I look at the special relationship I look at the big things.”

[Return to headlines]



UK: One in Six Patients ‘Wrongly Diagnosed by NHS Doctors’

Hundreds of thousands of people could be misdiagnosed by NHS doctors every year, an investigation has revealed.

Medics could be getting it wrong in as many as one in six of patient consultations in hospitals and primary care, according to Misdiagnosis, a BBC radio programme broadcast yesterday.

While most cases do not result in the patient suffering serious harm, a sizeable number are likely to experience significant health problems as a result.

But cases of misdiagnosis are not recorded anywhere in the NHS and this has led to growing demands for better reporting systems to help doctors prevent it.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



UK: Police Told to Treat Hundreds More Attacks as ‘Honour’ Crimes

Hundreds of attacks are to be treated as ‘honour’ crimes in a new drive by police to prosecute more offenders.

Prosecutors hope the drive will also ensure that victims receive more rapid protection that can save them from possible further violence or a forced marriage.

Under the new guidance it will be assumed that an honour crime has been committed in any case in which there is the slightest sign that such an offence has taken place — even if the victim has not reported it.

Elements of the strategy are designed to ensure that potentially vital evidence of honour-based persecution is not overlooked.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



UK: Public School Teacher Jailed for Lesbian Trysts Can Still Meet Victim, 15, On Release From Prison

A public school music teacher was yesterday jailed for having a lesbian relationship with a 15-year-old pupil — but told she could continue seeing her when she leaves prison.

A court heard that trumpet mistress Helen Goddard, 26, helped weave a web of lies so the ‘ vulnerable’ girl could stay in her flat overnight, and took her for a weekend in Paris, where they joined a gay pride march.

Judge Anthony Pitts jailed Goddard for 15 months, saying: ‘This case is so serious an immediate sentence of imprisonment is inevitable.’

But despite hearing from the girl’s parents the devastating effect the five-month sexual relationship had on the teenager, he rejected a prosecution request to ban the teacher from contacting her victim for five years, claiming it would be ‘unnecessary, unkind, and cruel to the victim’.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



UK: Payouts to Inmates Who Wait Too Long for Parole

Hundreds of violent criminals could win compensation after the High Court ruled yesterday that delays in granting parole to an arsonist violated his human rights.

Judges said a heavy caseload was no excuse for the ‘unlawful delay’ in considering Kevin Pennington for release from jail.

Their decision threatens to open the doors to a wave of similar claims as the Parole Board’s backlog is running at more than 1,000 offenders.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



UK: Retired Couple’s Home Trashed by 150 Yobs Who Gatecrashed Granddaughter’s Party Advertised on Twitter

A retired couple’s home was trashed after 150 drunken teenagers gatecrashed a party advertised on a social networking site.

Brian and Glennis McDonald, who were attending a wedding, had given their 15-year-old granddaughter Victoria permission for two friends to stay the night as a treat.

They even left her a note saying: ‘Bye darling. Have fun with your two friends.’

But just hours later, they were called by police and forced to return home to a scene of devastation after the gathering snowballed out of control when details were posted on Twitter.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



UK: Social Workers Ignored Mental Patient Brandishing Knife Days Before He Stabbed Grandfather to Death

A mental patient showed a lethal knife to social workers just days before he used the same weapon to stab a grandfather to death.

Paul Cusack, 32, who had previously been arrested for possessing knives in public, produced the weapon during a home visit and told social workers he had bought it for his own protection.

But just days later he attacked Sidney Waller, 67, a joiner, as he carried out work at his block of flats and repeatedly stabbed him in the neck and body.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



UK: School Children ‘Tried to Strangle’ Boy, 9, With Skipping Rope in Playground

A schoolboy needed medical treatment after two young children tried to strangle him with a skipping rope, it has been claimed.

The nine-year-old pupil was apparently throttled with the rope after being pounced on by a gang of children in a primary school playground.

His family are furious after a boy and a girl were suspended for one week for the attack.

The boy’s father, who is considering taking legal action, said: ‘I can’t believe those kids just got a week off. That’s not a punishment. They probably just played on their PlayStations.

‘I can’t believe the school haven’t done more. They didn’t tell the other parents or the governors that this had gone on.’

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]

Balkans


Serbia: Gay Parade Activists Vow to Fight

Belgrade, 21 Sept. (AKI) — The organisers of a gay parade cancelled in the Serbian capital Belgrade on Sunday after threats of violence have vowed continue their fight against discrimination in the Balkan country.

Organisers accused the government of yielding to threats but police described the parade as a “high risk event” and said they could not guarantee the safety of the participants.

This prompted the organisers to cancel the “Belgrade Pride 2009” march.

Milica Djordjevic, a member of the parade’s organising committee, said she expected no more than 1,000 participants in the parade.

“How is it possible that 4,500 police officers weren’t able to protect 1,000 participants?” she asked.

Police minister Ivica Dacic said he had planned to put 4,500 policemen on the streets, at a cost to the city of around 300,000 euros, but could not guarantee the safety of the participants.

Although police on Sunday arrested 37 ultranationalists, they reacted too late to threats which had been made weeks ago, Djordjevic told Adnkronos International (AKI).

Djordjevic said she was disappointed by “ambiguous” statements issued by politicians and others about the parade.

“The parade was not an end in itself, but a means of promoting gay rights and we will continue the fight until these goals are achieved,” she said.

Gay rights are still a taboo in Serbia and the gay community is largely forced underground, despite laws protecting it.

Two right-wing nationalist organisations, Obraz and the Serb Popular Movement 1389, had openly threatened to disrupt the parade and to set on fire buses transporting the participants.

Only four of the ultranationalists detained on Sunday will be tried, including Obraz and 1389 leaders Mladen Obradovic and Misa Vacic, Belgrade police director Milorad Veljovic said.

“The arrests will not prevent our followers from continuing to oppose not only gay parades, but all those who jeopardise the traditional values of Serbia as an Christian Orthodox country,” Obraz leader in Belgrade, Damir Grbic, told AKI .

“We have scored one victory, but we won’t stop until Serbia becomes a normal country,” Grbic said.

Although the Serbian parliament enacted a law in March banning discrimination against gays — amid fierce opposition — gays cannot marry or adopt children in Serbia.

Many gays are forced to lead a double life and use coded messages to meet in their homes as well as clubs and bars.

The planned gay parade caused a bitter rift between pro-European politicians who support the parade and nationalist groups and religious conservatives who oppose it.

The parade was supported by the Serbian human rights ministry and was the first one planned since 2001, when a gay march ended in violent clashes in which over 40 people were injured.

           — Hat tip: C. Cantoni [Return to headlines]



Serbia: EU to Approve Additional Eur 200 Million Aid

(ANSAmed) — BELGRADE, SEPTEMBER 18 — The EU will grant an additional EUR200 million of macroeconomic aid to cover Serbia’s budget needs, Serbian Deputy Prime Minister Bozidar Djelic said after meeting with Commissioner for Economic and Monetary Affairs Joaquin Almunia. The funds represent a loan granted under very favorable conditions, such as those applied in the EU itself, said Djelic, who also signed an agreement on EUR100 million in non-returnable EU assistance for the Serbian budget. The agreement on the EUR200 million in macroeconomic aid will be signed in November, and the funds will be used to cover the budget’s priority needs and Serbia’s European integrations program. The EU has granted the EUR300 million for the needs of the Serbian budget on condition that the program the Serbian authorities agreed with the International Monetary Fund be continued, as well as the reforms that are preparing Serbia for association with the EU.(ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]

Mediterranean Union


Animals: Mediterranean; Agriculture Top Cause of Extinction

(ANSAmed) — ROME, SEPTEMBER 21 — Agriculture threatens 65% of species and is the top activity causing mammals to risk extinction in the Mediterranean region. Turkey is the country with the most at-risk species. So underlined a study conducted by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Along with agriculture, the second and third top activities causing species to risk extinction are hunting and invasive species. Together, all three of these activities destroy and degrade mammals’ natural habitats in the Mediterranean region, a condition that affects 90% of at-risk species. Habitat destruction occurs also due to urbanisation, infrastructure, pollution, and climate change. For each species there are specific causes. Bats, for example, are threatened by tourism, caving or improper positioning of gates at the entrance of caves, which has contributed to them losing their natural habitat. (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Mammals: Mediterranean, One in Six Species Risks Extinction

(ANSAmed) — ROME — Of the 320 species of mammals that populate the countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea, one out of every six risks extinction according to a new study conducted by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). According to their data, from 1500 until today eight species have gone extinct. Among these is a species endemic to Sardinia and Corsica, while the other seven only went extinct at a regional level. The researchers observed that 3% of mammals are “in critical danger”, 5% are “in danger”, 8% are “vulnerable”, and another 8% are close to being at risk for extinction. More than one-fourth of mammal populations (27%) are in decline, while 31% of species have a stable population. There is insufficient data on for 40% of mammal species, while only 3% have increased their population. Mammal biodiversity in the Mediterranean region is greatest in the mountainous regions. The mountainous regions in Turkey, the east, and north-western Africa are the regions with the most mammals that risk extinction. Of the 49 threatened species, 20 (41%) are unique to the Mediterranean region. “The main cause of extinction,” said Annabelle Cuttelod, the co-author of the report, “is the destruction of the natural habitat of these species. We need,” she concluded, “action at an international level to protect natural areas and reserves to assure that the biodiversity of these areas is not lost”.(ANSAmed)

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]

North Africa


Muslim Man Beheads Christian in Egypt

By Mary Abdelmassih-

Egypt (AINA) — Osama Araban, a Muslim man riding a Harley-Davidson motorcycle, went on a rampage last week in Egypt, killing 63-year old Coptic Christian Abdo George Younan, in the village of Bagour, before traveling onwards and stabbing with intention to kill two other Copts in two different villages, at least 10 km apart (AINA 9-18-2009).

In the village of Behnay he repeatedly stabbed Coptic shoemaker Adib Boulos before being stopped by eyewitness Behman Saeed, after whom Osama Araban ran, leaving the victim behind. Adib suffered a broken scull and lung hemorrhage, and is still fighting for his life in intensive care unit at Shebin el-Kom Hospital.

Osama Araban then traveled to the village of Mit Afif and stabbed his third victim, Sobhy Barsum, a blacksmith. He also stabbed his brother Hani Barsum in the neck — only to be saved by a co-worker. Hani was also hospitalized.

Osama Araban was arrested the following day.

The funeral procession of Abdo Younan was attended by thousands of Copts, led by Metropolitan Archbishop Benjamin of Menoufia Diocese and seventeen clergymen. Hundreds of banners were held, showing the amount of anger and injustice felt by Copts. Anti State Security chants were heard during the procession, besides calling on President Mubarak and the government to save the Copts from the hands of the fundamentalist who are killing them.

This incident which took place on September 16, 2009, has left Copts in Egypt shocked and angered, not only because attacks against Copts have been escalating, but because of the way the murder was committed.

The details of the attacks, not told by the media, but exposed by Coptic lawyers and activists, reveal that 35-year old car painter Osama Araban not only stabbed Abdo nine times but also severed his head from his body — an Islamic ritual beheading. He then meticulously washed his bayonet with the water hose the victim was using, before setting off on his motorcycle to the next two villages, looking for more Coptic victims.

Egyptian State Security, which is in charge of drafting press releases and news related to Muslim attacks on Christians, decided from the start which route they wanted the incident to take, and tailor the news accordingly.

In an attempt to influence public opinion for the forthcoming acquittal of the Muslim killer, the media reported that the reason for the killing was a “material dispute.”

Renowned attorney and activist Dr.Naguib Ghoraeel, head of Egyptian Union Human Rights Organization, issued a press release on September 17, calling the crime a massacre, and confirming that what happened was revenge against Christians. He accused the Interior Ministry of lying I suggesting the incident “is a mere quarrel,” and warned them that no one will believe that the murderer is “mentally unstable,” should they use this defense.

Ghoraeel accused the police of seriously tampering with evidence, by insisting on the body being removed by ambulance. “Investigators came to a scene without a body, and then went to inspect the body in another place,” he said.

Many lawyers believe that this step was taken in order to reduce the judicial verdict down to manslaughter.

According to Copts United Advocacy, Reverend Estephanos Azer, the priest at St. Serapium Church in neighboring Shebin el Kom, condemned the authorities and media fabrications when dealing with cases of Muslims killing Christians. He denied any financial dealings between the victim and his killer.

“I hope that the authorities would respect our intelligence. The media treats us as a herd of sheep. We refuse that completely. We have logic and can think.” He went on to voice what all Copts are saying that with every attack on Copts, the incident has to have one of two scenarios: either the killer is “mentally deranged,” or the incident is due to a “material dispute.”

Taken the criticism the State Security received regarding their usual scenarios, they have now decided to take a completely different route, never used before. The pro-government newspaper “Youm 7” reported that Obdo Younan “Insulted Islam” and the killer therefore decided to take revenge by killing him. This news was picked up by other news agencies.

Following this murder, Coptic shopkeepers in Bagour, Manufiya province, north-west of Cairo, are terrified to open their shops. “I am a watchmaker, How can I work when I feel that if I look down, someone might jump on me and behead me,” a shopkeeper told Free Copts.

George Abdo, son of the slain victim, believes that a radical Islamic organization is behind the incident. “For whose benefit is all this government misleading information?” he said, “we want justice nothing more.” George said that by appeasing the radicals at the expense of the Copts, the government is giving them a green light to do as they please with the Copts. “Pressure on Copts will lead to explosion sooner or later. We are unable to live this way; we have nothing to loose,” he warned.

In an interview with Free Copts, lawyer activist Ashraf Ghobrial, one of the organizers of the Coptic National Strike on September 11, called on President Mubarak to personally intervene to ensure the safety of Coptic citizens. He said “I am saying there must be someone behind the killer. We ask the State Security to look for the terrorist cell behind him. If they don’t, this incident will happen again and again, in different parts of the country. We want the State Security to protect us, all what they do is spy on us.”

No Muslim has ever been sentenced justly for killing a Copt. Consequently, the Egyptian Government’s manipulation of facts is not to save the Copt’s murderer from a just punishment, but more to save its face in front of the Western world for being blatantly unjust towards the Coptic victim, given that Egypt is a member of the UN Human Rights Council which is responsible for the protection of human rights around the globe.

[Return to headlines]

Israel and the Palestinians


EU: Veneto Wins Project for Israel and Palestinian Activity

(ANSAmed) — BRUSSELS, SEPTEMBER 14 — To educate for peace, involving the media: this is the aim of the European project, won by the Veneto Regional Council as leader of “PET-med”(EU Partnership for Peace). The action plan, informs the Veneto Regional Council office in Brussels, provides for the setting up of a series of activities in the territories of the State of Israel and the Palestinian authorities of the West Bank and of Gaza with the aim of strengthening the role of the media as an instrument to promote tolerance and mutual understanding between local communities in conflict. The objectives include the identification of shared standards and work methods which allow complete and impartial information on the conflict and the peace process in Israel and Palestine, the development of teaching methods for students and teachers on the critical use of media on the subject of conflict, the setting up and production of a radio format through joint work by professionals in the sector, and finally the creation of transnational workgroups that include members of the various communities involved in the conflict.(ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Morocco: Investment Fund Buys Land in Jerusalem

(ANSAmed) — RABAT, SEPTEMBER 21 — Moroccan investment fund Quds, (Jerusalem in Arabic) announced that they have bought land in Jerusalem for 5 million dollars and intend to preserve the Arab-Muslim cultural character in the eastern part of the city, annexed in 1967 by Israel. “The land, 1800m2, will host a cultural centre called the House of Morocco” said Abdelkebir Alaoui Mdaghri, the head of the Al Quds Fund and former Foreign Minister. “About 90% of Arab-Muslim lands were annexed by Israel, which built buildings and houses,” added Mdagri; “it is urgent to act otherwise there will be no Arab-Muslim land left in the holy city”. In 2009 the Al Quds fund donated a new surgery ward to the Palestinian hospital in Jerusalem and financed the construction of a college and the restructuring of four schools. (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Music: Elvis Unites All Just a Stone’s Throw From Jerusalem

(ANSAmed) — ABU GOSH (ISRAEL), SEPTEMBER 14 — Israel has its own Graceland. In the primarily Arab Abu Gosh suburb, just a dozen kilometres from Jerusalem, the memory of Elvis has been devotedly — if not religiously — cultivated by the legend’s most hardcore fans. The HQ is the Elvis Inn: a 1950s-themed restaurant, managed by Jews but frequented by Arabs too in the name of the legend who once again unites rather than divides. There are thousands of photos, posters and postcards. Icons cover every spare inch of the place. There are also 4 life-size statues of Elvis in various poses, for example sitting at a table or strumming a guitar. But the artistic verve of the owners — brothers Uri and Amnon, who have run the restaurant for some 20 years, reaches a pinnacle on the painting that adorns the ceiling. Ten years ago Uri unscrupulously copied the frescos of the Sistine Chapel to illustrate the salient moments of Elvis’ life. It is all illuminated by orange neon to underline the dramatic developments of the personal life of the legend from Memphis. Every year, on the anniversary of the death of Elvis on August 16, the local lookalikes meet here and sing in his honour. “We celebrate his life and his legacy,” said Eran Lev-Ron, who has been an Elvis impersonator for 30 odd years. And Elvis-mania is not confined to the restaurant. Just around the corner is a hairdresser who promises customers a perfect quiff which was Elvis’ trademark for years. Whilst in an unnamed parking lot, near a petrol station, there are two golden statues of the idol measuring 4 metres in height. One, in a typical swinging pose, has an arm raised: it is said round here that he is indicating, in a rather profane way, the road to Jerusalem.(ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Swedish-Israeli Relations Continue to Deteriorate

Relations between Sweden, the EU presidency-in-office, and Israel have gone from bad to worse after Israel accused Sweden of breaking an EU ban on contact with Hamas.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made the allegations at a meeting with Spanish foreign minister Miguel Angel Moratinos 10 days ago, according to Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

Sweden on Monday (21 September) reportedly summoned Israel’s ambassador in Stockholm, Benny Dagan, to clarify Mr Netanyahu’s remarks and issued a robust denial.

“The government of Sweden has no political contact with Hamas. We are acting in accord with all EU policies in this area and allegations about such contacts have no substance,” it said in a statement.

Hamas spokesman Ghazi Hamad on 14 September told EUobserver that high-ranking officials from EU countries, including people “very close” to EU leaders and foreign ministers, meet with the militant group on a weekly basis.

He mentioned visits from France, Spain, Germany, Italy, the UK and Luxembourg, but not Sweden.

The EU in 2006 formally suspended high-level talks with Hamas, which it calls a terrorist entity.

Swedish-Israeli relations already suffered in August, when Sweden declined Israeli demands to censure a Swedish newspaper article accusing Israeli soldiers of selling the bodily organs of dead Palestinians.

Sweden’s chancellor of justice, Goran Lambertz, on Monday (21 September), quashed an enquiry into whether the organ-harvesting article incited racial hatred.

The Nordic country has also criticised Israeli settlement building in the occupied Palestinian territories and supported an EU freeze on plans to upgrade diplomatic ties with the Jewish state.

Spain, which takes over the rotating EU presidency in January, has in recent times been more Israel-friendly than Sweden.

Spanish Prime Minister Jorge Luis Zapatero is to visit Jerusalem on 14 October. And foreign minister Moratinos has good contacts with the Israeli administration following his work as the EU envoy for the Middle East peace process from 1996 to 2003.

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]

Middle East


Barry Rubin: How the West’s Enemies Are Saving it

When people are very pessimistic, I say to them: Don’t worry our enemies will save us.

By that I mean that the enemies of peace, progress, and democracy—Islamists and radical Arab nationalists, terrorists and silly people in the West alike—are so intransigent, obviously lying, and dangerously wrong about society that they will convince and force most people to reject and combat them.

Even when thrown lifelines, even when confronted with naiveté, they reject concessions, turn up their nose at compromise, go too far, and make their nonsense so illogical and apparent, as to either teach the naïve in political and intellectual power or persuade others push them aside in order to survive.

Today offers some examples of this idea:

The presidency of Barack Obama and the relatively soft stands of European states have given Iran a great opportunity. Tehran could have made a show of flexibility, a strong pretense about being cooperative, and met with Obama. This would have forestalled a higher level of Western sanctions, while Iran could still work secretly on nuclear weapons.

After all, even after a virtual coup by the most hardline faction, the stolen election, the strong repression, the show trials of dissidents, and the appointment of a wanted terrorist as defense minister [that’s a pretty amazing list, isn’t it?], the West was still willing to deal with the regime.

Instead, Iran produced an “offer” to negotiate so minimal that even the Europeans rejected it. While this doesn’t mean all is well—Russia and China will block and sabotage even moderate sanctions; the West Europeans will oppose really strong ones—at least Iran’s last-minute effort to derail the process altogether will fail.

Imagine what the Iranian regime could have done if the ruling establishment had let someone less extreme than Mahmoud Ahmadinejad get elected, then claimed this showed what a moderate and democratic state they were running. A charm offensive could have defused the nuclear controversy and the sanctions would have fallen away. Iran would have been set loose and a few years from now could have finished its nuclear program in a relaxed manner.

But no!

Turn to Lebanon…

           — Hat tip: Barry Rubin [Return to headlines]



Brzezinski Suggests Obama Shoot Down Israeli Jets

‘They have the choice of turning back or not’

The national security adviser during the administration of President Jimmy Carter says the United States should shoot down Israeli jets if that nation chooses to take military action against a nuclear project in Iran.

Zbigniew Brzezinski, in an interview with the Daily Beast website, declared, “We are not exactly impotent little babies.”

Israel long has been thought to be considering a military strike against operations in Iran that could result in a nuclear weapon for the regime of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Israel has stated that it is unwilling to have its future threatened by a leader who believes it should be wiped off the map, as Ahmadinejad has stated, with access to nuclear weapons.

But such an Israeli attack on Iran probably would have to fly over coalition airspace in Iraq.

“Are we just going to sit there and watch?” Brzezinski demanded.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



Cinema: Lebanese Press Attacks Israeli Film ‘Lebanon’

(ANSAmed) — BEIRUT, SEPTEMBER 21 — The Lebanese press has unanimously attacked the Israeli film “Lebanon”, which won the Leone d’Oro award at the Venice Film Festival, about Israel’s invasion of Lebanon in 1982, branding it “biased”, “hypocritical” and “lacking self-criticism”. The film, directed by Sam Maoz (who fought in Lebanon), recounts the horrors of the war seen from inside an Israeli tank, showing the dead from a slit of the tank and describing the torments of the four soldiers inside. The film will not be released in Lebanon, where Israeli products are boycotted. “It is an operation of self defence where the Other does not exist, where there is only a masked, absent enemy, which the film treats as a terrorist,” writes the An-Nahar correspondent in Venice. An-Nahar is close to the pro-West government majority. For daily paper Al-Akhbar, which backs the Hezbollah minority party, “a lot of people thought it was a film against war, that it criticised wars carried out by the Israeli State… but in fact it doesn’t criticise anything. It deals with the psychological crises of four solders inside a tank.” Pro-government daily Al-Mustaqbal writes that the festival jury wept for the fate of “four solders who ‘suffered too much’“, but not for “the victims of war”. “27 years after having killed a person for the first time in his life, Maoz replaces the tank with a movie camera,” writes An-Nahar. “The first time he kills, the second time he tries to convince you… but the truth is lost.” For Al-Akhbar, “Maoz took advantage of the trend launched by Ari Folman in Cannes” with the animated film ‘Waltz with Bashir’: “This Israeli fashion of examining the tortured conscience is continuing with success.”(ANSAmed).

2009-09-21 10:33

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Iran Nuclear Head Says New Centrifuges Built

Iran’s nuclear chief said Tuesday the Islamic Republic had built a new generation of centrifuges as President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad warned that his country was ready to confront the “forces of darkness” from anywhere in the world.

“Our scientists have built new generation of centrifuges and cascades with 10 centrifuges each are now being tested,” Ali Akbar Salehi was quoted as saying by the official IRNA news agency.

Salehi said the new generation of centrifuges can enrich uranium with “more than five times the output capacity” of the earlier standard centrifuges and that Iran “plans to raise this capacity to 10 times.”

Iran and the world powers are at loggerheads over Tehran’s decision to continue enriching uranium, the process which can generate the raw material to make an atomic bomb.

The atomic chief’s statements came shortly after Ahmadinejad, speaking at an army parade marking the anniversary of the eruption of the Iran-Iraq war in 1980, renewed his demand that U.S.-led foreign forces operating in neighboring Iraq and Afghanistan leave the region.

“We advise you to go back to your own land. Our region will never accept a lengthy presence of foreigners,” the re-elected president, dressed in his trademark light-color jacket and wearing sunglasses, said at the ceremony attended by top military and administrative officials.

“As you saw in Iraq and Afghanistan, people are against the presence of foreigners. It is impossible (for foreign troops) to have a stable base in the region,” added Ahmadinejad, who according to state television left Iran shortly after the parade, bound for New York where he is to attend the U.N. General Assembly meeting.

During the parade, Iranian military pick-up trucks were seen sporting large banners proclaiming, “Death to Israel” and “Death to America.”

“Satanic powers”

“Our armed forces are ready to confront the forces of darkness. If anybody wants to shoot a bullet at us from anywhere, we will cut off his hands,” the president said in his address to the nation.

Thousands of soldiers participated in the parade during which Iran also showed off its range of missiles, including the latest Sejil version, and displayed its fighter plane, Saegheh, which it claims to have built domestically.

The annual event marking the invasion of Iran by Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi forces which provoked a war lasting almost a decade was marred when a military plane taking part in the extravaganza crashed near Tehran, according to IRNA.

IRNA later dropped the report from its website without giving any reason. No independent confirmation could be obtained concerning the reported crash.

The parade took place opposite the mausoleum built for Iran’s revolutionary leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini on the outskirts of Tehran.

Ahmadinejad said the Iran-Iraq war, which killed about a million people on both sides, and which Iran describes as the “Sacred Defense”, was a “humiliation to Satanic forces.” Iranian officials refer to the United States as the Great Satan.

“Chemical weapons were used against our nation and the Satanic powers equipped Saddam (Hussein) against our nation. Saddam was backed by certain arrogant powers,” the president said, reminiscing about the brutal conflict.

“We ask the arrogant powers to revise their polices… they sell weapons and then talk of peace.”

           — Hat tip: TB [Return to headlines]



Yemen: Army Defeats Shia Attack, 140 Rebels Killed

(ANSAMED) — SANAA (YEMEN), SEPTEMBER 21 — More than 140 Shia rebels have been killed in the north of Yemen during violent clashes with the army in Saada, capital of the Saada province and stronghold of the rebellion. The news was reported by a military source. The rebels attacked the city from three directions, trying to conquer the presidential palace, the symbol of state power in the province. Government forces were able to defeat the attacks, with violent clashes in which the guerrillas suffered heavy losses. “The bodies of more than rebels have been recovered so far,” said the military source. The Shia rebels ask for the return of secular power to the Zaidit imam in the Saada province, on the border with Saudi Arabia, annexed in 1962 by the Yemen (which has a Sunni majority). The rebellion began in 2004. On August 11 the army launched a massive offensive on the Zaidits. This morning’s attack broke the truce announced 24 hours earlier by government forces. (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]

South Asia


Kabul: Flowers and Cards for the Fallen, You Are Our Heroes

(ANSAmed) — ROME, SEPTEMBER 21 — Hundreds of bunches of flowers and cards reading “thank you, you are our heroes” and “you make us proud to be Italian”. This is how thousands of people from Rome and from the whole of Italy have paid tribute to the 6 paratroopers killed in an attack in Afghanistan last week, who are now lying in state at the Celio military hospital in Rome. Outside the chapel of rest, people who have come to pay their respects have left hundreds of bunches of flowers. “Thank you defenders of the nation and of freedom,” reads one card attached to a bunch of roses. “May the Lord reward you for the courage you have shown in helping others,” reads another. “You are our heroes.” The funerals of the six paratroopers will take place today, a day of national mourning in Italy. A long funeral cortege will this morning carry the six coffins from the Celio hospital to the San Paolo basilica for the state funeral, which will take place at 11am.(ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



U.S. Says Pakistan, Iran Helping Taliban

Reporting from Washington — The U.S. military commander in Afghanistan says he has evidence that factions of Pakistani and Iranian spy services are supporting insurgent groups that carry out attacks on coalition troops.

Taliban fighters in Afghanistan are being aided by “elements of some intelligence agencies,” Army Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal wrote in a detailed analysis of the military situation delivered to the White House earlier this month.

McChrystal went on to single out Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency as well as the Quds Force of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as contributing to the external forces working to undermine U.S. interests and destabilize the government in Kabul.

The remarks reflect long-running U.S. concerns about Pakistan and Iran, but it is rare that they have been voiced so prominently by a top U.S. official. McChrystal submitted his assessment last month, and a declassified version was published Sunday on the Washington Post website.

The criticism of Pakistan is a particularly delicate issue because of the United States’ close cooperation with Islamabad in pursuing militants and carrying out drone airstrikes in the nation’s rugged east.

“Afghanistan’s insurgency is clearly supported from Pakistan,” McChrystal wrote, adding that senior leaders of the major Taliban groups are “reportedly aided by some elements of Pakistan’s ISI.” The ISI has long-standing ties to the Taliban, but Pakistani officials have repeatedly claimed to have severed those relationships in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks.

More recently, the ISI has been a key U.S. partner in the capture of a number of high-level Al Qaeda operatives, including alleged Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed. But U.S. officials have also complained of ongoing contacts between the spy service and Taliban groups.

U.S. frustration peaked last year when Adm. Michael G. Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and other U.S. officials secretly confronted Pakistan with evidence of ISI involvement in the suicide bombing of the Indian Embassy in Kabul.

Since then, U.S. officials have sought to avoid public criticism of the Pakistani service as part of an effort to defuse tensions in the relationship. Indeed, U.S. officials in recent months have said that the ISI had become more committed to the counter-terrorism cause after one of the service’s own facilities in Lahore was the target of a suicide bombing.

McChrystal’s comments are the first public indication in months that the United States continues to see signs of ISI support for insurgent groups. Experts said elements of the ISI maintain those ties to hedge against a U.S. withdrawal from the region and rising Indian influence in Afghanistan.

“There is a mixture of motives and concerns within the ISI that have accounted for the dalliances that have gone on for years” with insurgent groups, said Paul Pillar, a former senior CIA counter-terrorism official.

Iran has traditionally had an adversarial relationship with the Taliban, and McChrystal’s report says that Tehran has played “an ambiguous role in Afghanistan,” providing developmental assistance to the government even as it flirts with insurgent groups that target U.S. troops.

“The Iranian Quds Force is reportedly training fighters for certain Taliban groups and providing other forms of military assistance to insurgents,” McChrystal said in the report. The Quds Force is an elite wing of the Revolutionary Guard that carries out operations in other countries.

McChrystal did not elaborate on the nature of the assistance, but Iran has been a transit point for foreign fighters entering Pakistan. Experts also cited evidence that Iran has provided training and technology in the use of roadside bombs.

U.S. intelligence officials said Iran appears to calibrate its involvement to tie down U.S. and coalition troops without provoking direct retaliation.

Iran’s aim “is to make sure the U.S. is tied down and preoccupied in yet another theater,” said Bruce Hoffman, a terrorism expert at Georgetown University. “From Iran’s point of view, it’s an historical area of interest and too good an opportunity to pass up.”

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]

Sub-Saharan Africa


Kenya Criticises US Somali Raid

Kenyan Foreign Minister Moses Wetangula has criticised last week’s raid by US forces in Somalia in which a suspected al-Qaeda member was reportedly killed.

Mr Wetangula told the Reuters news agency that he felt uncomfortable when the US conducted operations in the region without sharing information.

He said such “lone ranger behaviour” had frequently failed to achieve the stated goals.

Kenya is a US ally in the fight against East African Islamist militants.

Mr Wetangula also said that he welcomed any “success” in the raid.

US Special Forces flew into Somalia by helicopter, killed Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan and carried away his body, officials said.

Analysts say Nabhan was one of the most senior leaders of al-Qaeda’s East Africa cell.

It is believed he fled to Somalia after the 2002 attacks and was working with the al-Shabab group, which the Americans see as al-Qaeda’s proxy in Somalia.

Al-Shabab, which controls much of southern Somalia, later staged a suicide bombing on African Union peacekeepers in Mogadishu, saying it was revenge for the US raid.

Nabhan was suspected of two attacks on the same day — bombing an Israeli-owned hotel in the Kenyan port city of Mombasa and trying to shoot down an Israeli airliner.

The authorities in Kenya also regard him as a suspect in two attacks on US embassies in the region in 1998.

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]



Muslims Mass-Producing Children to Take Over Africa, Says Archbishop

One of the most powerful figures in the Anglican Church believes that Africa is under attack from Islam and that Muslims are “mass-producing” children to take over communities on the continent.

Archbishop Nicholas Okoh, 56, was elected Primate of Nigeria last week and his elevation could exacerbate tensions at a time when Anglicans are working to build bridges with Muslims. Dr Michael Nazir-Ali resigned as Bishop of Rochester earlier this year to work in countries where Islam is the majority religion.

Nigeria is split almost half and half between Christianity and Islam. There are about 17 million practising Anglicans in the country, but they face persecution in the north, while the two faiths vie with local religions for supremacy in the rest of the country.

Archbishop Okoh made his controversial comments about Islam in a sermon in Beckenham, Kent, in July. He said that there was a determined Islamic attack in African countries such as Uganda, Kenya and Rwanda.

“They spend a lot of money, even in places where they don’t have congregations, they build mosques, they build hospitals, they build anything.

“They come to Africans and say, ‘Christianity is asking you to marry only one wife. We will give you four!’ “ Archbishop Okoh described this as “evangelism by mass-production”.

He said: “That is the type of evangelism they are doing: mass-production, so if you have four wives, four children, sixteen children, very soon you will be a village.”

Africa was “surrounded by Islamic domination,” he said, and he urged Christians to speak out now or lose the authority to speak. “I am telling you, Islam is spending in Uganda and in other places, it is money from the Arab World,” he claimed, accusing Christians of abdicating their responsibilities. “Who is the leader in the Christian world? There is no leader.”

One senior member of Britain’s Muslim community said: “The views presented by the Archbishop are extremist and overwhelmed by Islamophobia and his elevation will certainly foster misunderstanding and extremism. Knowing the communal geography of Nigeria, he will be a massive danger to community relations and cohesion in his country, besides places like London.”

           — Hat tip: Steen [Return to headlines]

Immigration


Denmark and Ireland Drop ‘Sham Marriage’ Demands

Denmark and Ireland say they will not demand changes to the EU directive on the freedom of people to prevent sham marriages. Denmark and Ireland have dropped their demands for a European law to be changed to prevent immigrants arranging sham marriages to stay in the EU. Both countries have accepted that few other member states wish to reopen the EU directive on the free movement of people within the EU. The European Commission had also opposed such a move.

Denmark and Ireland declared themselves satisfied with conclusions agreed by EU interior ministers yesterday which assert that member states are allowed to take “appropriate steps” to combat abuse. The conclusions add that if evidence shows that the abuse continues and is widespread, the matter will be referred to the Commission to be addressed by “the most appropriate means”. Karen Ellemann, Denmark’s interior minister, told her EU counterparts in a meeting in Brussels yesterday that she would continue to monitor the extent of sham marriages and abuse of the EU law. “If there is a systematic tendency towards fraud the Commission is obliged to come up with a proposal,” said a Danish official.

The official added that it remained a “long-term goal” of Denmark to see the directive changed. The issue took on political significance in Denmark last year when the Danish People’s Party, a far-right party that supports the government, said that it would withdraw its support if the directive remained unchanged. Ellemann is today (22 September) meeting members of the Danish People’s Party to explain the outcome of the meeting in Brussels.

The issue arose from a European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling in what was known as the Metock case in July last year. The ECJ struck down a law in Ireland banning non-EU citizens from living in Ireland with a non-Irish EU spouse, unless they had lived together previously in another member state. Denmark and Ireland, supported by the UK and Austria, said the ECJ ruling prevented them from stamping out marriages of convenience.

A spokeswoman for the Irish government said: “Ireland continues to have real concerns about the potential for exploitation of the directive in light of the Metock ruling. We will be monitoring the situation closely and will continue to exchange information on abuse and fraud with other member states and the Commission, as agreed today.

“In July the Commission issued guidelines on the implementation of the directive, saying that member states could put a minimum duration on marriages with non-EU citizens, but other factors would also have to be taken into account, such as whether the couples held a joint mortgage.

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]



France: Police Dismantle Migrant Camp in Calais

Calais, 22 Sept. (AKI) — French police on Tuesday began dismantling a makeshift migrant camp in a bid to tackle suspected people smuggling near the northern port of Calais. French officials said 278 migrants had been detained in the security operation at the camp, known as “the Jungle”, and more than 1,000 had left the area.

Rights protesters clashed with around 600 police who sealed off the area and some arrests were reported.

The squalid camps consisted of cardboard, plastic tarpaulins and scraps of wood and housed about 300 men from countries including Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and Somalia.

Rights activists formed a human chain when the operation began early on Tuesday.

The head of Calais police, Pierre de Bousquet de Florian, said the operation had been a success.

He said 146 adults and 132 self-declared minors had been detained by police and the minors had been transferred to special centres.

Many of the residents are believed to have had plans to cross the English Channel to seek asylum in Britain. Others hoped to obtain refugee status in France.

The French government’s decision drew criticism from humanitarian groups who question whether demolishing the camp will help resolve illegal immigration issues.

The office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees sent staff to Calais earlier this year to counsel people about asylum procedures in France and Britain.

           — Hat tip: C. Cantoni [Return to headlines]



Italy’s Migrant Crackdown Sparks Political Tensions

ROME (Reuters) — The deaths of 73 African migrants who drifted for three weeks in the Mediterranean without rescue have heightened concern about Italy’s crackdown on immigration, opening cracks in its ruling coalition and a rift with Brussels.

Five survivors, picked up off the Italian island of Lampedusa, said their grey dinghy left Libya carrying 78 people. A day later, the motor died: two pregnant girls, raped by traffickers, were among the first to die of thirst and exposure.

Italy is the first landing-point in Europe for many migrants from Africa and tragedies in the Mediterranean have become a fixture of the migration season, but since Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi toughened its immigration laws, things have changed.

The migrants said a dozen fishing boats passed but only one answered their calls, throwing food but refusing to board.

“There used to be competition among fishermen to save lives, but…with Italy’s new law making immigration a crime, they’ve become too afraid,” said Laura Boldrini of the UN refugee agency, UNHCR. “The Mediterranean has become a No Man’s Land.”

In Italy, the survivors were placed under guard. Unless they win asylum, they may face detention under legislation passed in July making it a felony to be an illegal immigrant or help one.

That followed a deal Italy struck with Libya in May enabling it to return migrants stopped in international waters to Libya: the UNHCR has said that arrangement, the fruit of Berlusconi’s closer ties with Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, consigns hundreds of asylum-seekers to inhumane camps in North Africa.

Rome’s hard line has strained relations with the European Commission, which last month called for an investigation into the repatriations to Libya. Berlusconi threatened to block all EU business unless Commission spokespeople were silenced.

“We need more than words,” Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said last month, denying Italy was responsible for the tragedy. He said frontier states were being unfairly burdened by illegal migration to the 27-nation bloc: “This is a European problem.”

Current EU President Sweden has vowed to discuss migration at an October summit, but analysts say it could be hard to curb mounting racism in Italy as the global crisis ups unemployment.

FAR RIGHT NOT MARGINAL

Italy’s crackdown was promoted by the far-right Northern League, a lynchpin of Berlusconi’s coalition, following a 75 percent leap in migrants arriving by sea last year to 37,000.

The measures, which include legalizing citizens’ patrols to enforce law and order, cut the number of migrants landing in south Italy between May and August to less than a tenth of last summer’s 10,000 and struck a chord with many Italians, worried by mass immigration and rising crime.

One TV poll said 71 percent thought the five survivors of last month’s boat tragedy should be tried as illegal immigrants.

“There is no doubt that racism is becoming more visible… and it’s going to get worse: partly because of the economy,” said James Walston, professor of Italian politics at the American University in Rome. “It’s dangerous because the far right in most countries is marginal. Here it is not.”…

           — Hat tip: Fjordman [Return to headlines]



Rome’s Migrant Policy in Spotlight

EU, UN, Human Rights Watch voice concern over ‘push backs’

(ANSA) — Rome, September 21 — Rome’s policy of forcibly escorting boat migrants approaching Italian shores to Libya instead of bringing them to Italy was back in the international spotlight on Monday. The European Commission, the United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR) and Human Rights Watch all expressed concerns over the so-called ‘push-back’ policy, which provides for asylum claims to be vetted in Libya rather than in Italy. Libya is the main departure point for African migrants and asylum seekers trying to reach Europe via Italy. The policy, which was launched in May, was criticized after a meeting of European Union interior ministers at which Justice and Security Commissioner Jacques Barrot unveiled detailed proposals to distribute refugees more evenly across the bloc. Meeting with reporters in a joint conference with UN Refugee Commissioner Antonio Guterres, Barrot said the situation facing asylum seekers in Libya had to change as soon as possible. “We must show the Libyans that the current situation is unacceptable and cannot continue for much longer,” said Barrot, who is also vice-president of the EU’s executive body. Guterres expressed “strong reservations” over Italy’s policy. “Our position is very clear,” he told reporters. “We do not believe that conditions in Libya provide the necessary safeguards to protect asylum seekers”. He said there was a “severe risk that asylum seekers will be sent back to their countries of origin”, and said individuals in Libyan detention centres were subject to “terrible conditions”.

The Italian government’s special envoy for humanitarian emergencies, Margherita Boniver, admitted conditions in Libya were problematic but said efforts were being made to rectify the situation. “There should be inspections and recommendations and Libya should face penalties until its mistreatment of migrants ends — on this point we are all in complete agreement,” she said. Boniver also stressed that the push-back policy was only enforced against migrants in international waters. “Once people reach Italian waters, they are not accompanied back to Libya and Italy, as it has always done, receives them”.

Italian Interior Undersecretary Saverio Nitto Palma said Italy was doing its best to cope with a large number of asylum seekers. “There has been a large increase in the number of asylum seekers from the Horn of Africa who are travelling through Libya,” he explained, calling for a specific program to deal with the situation. However, the remarks by Barrot and Guterres prompted renewed calls for a change in policy from opposition MPs and migrant groups in Italy. Sandro Gozi, an EU policy representative for the largest opposition Democratic Party said there had been “too much criticism from authorititative voices” and warned Italy “will pay for its arrogant rejection of migrants with political isolation”.

Leoluca Orlando of the small Italy of Values party said the Italian government was now facing “criticism on a near daily basis from international and European organizations for its violation of refugee rights”. The Italian Refugee Council expressed satisfaction that Barrot “has finally made it clear that people who need protection cannot be taken back to Libya”.

One of Italy’s most senior churchman also voiced concern over the rights of refugees on Monday.

Addressing the opening of the Italian Bishops Conference, the organization’s president Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco said “human rights guarantees for immigrants contained in national and international laws” should not be “ignored”.

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH RAPS ITALY. The remarks by Barrot and Guterres came on the same day the New York-based international organization Human Rights Watch (HRW) published a scathing 92-page report on the push-back policy, entitled ‘Pushed Back, Pushed Around’. “The reality is that Italy is sending people back to abuse,” said HRW refugee policy director Bill Frelick, who authored the report.

The report, based on interviews with 91 migrants and asylum seekers in Italy and Malta since May 2009, said the push-back policy was an “open violation of Italy’s legal obligation not to commit refoulement”, which is the forced return of people to places where they risk abuse or death. “Italy flouts its legal obligations by summarily returning boat migrants to Libya,” said Frelick.

“The EU should demand that Italy comply with its obligations by halting these returns to Libya”.

Libya is not a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention, which provides internationally recognized rights for asylum seekers and refugees, has no asylum laws and does not distinguish between refugees, asylum seekers and other migrants. People entering Libya without documents or permission are treated as illegal entrants and subject to arrest. The Italian government says its policy is compliant with international law and EU regulations and draws attention to fact its location on the EU’s southernmost border means it has to cope with a disproportionate number of arrivals. The government says Italy has rescued more than 52,000 boat migrants between January 2007 and August 2009. More than 1,300 people intercepted in international waters have been sent back to Libya since May this year.

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Video: Police Clear French Migrant Camp

French police have moved in to dismantle a makeshift camp set up by migrants near the port of Calais.

French officials said 278 migrants had been held in the operation at the camp known as “the jungle”. More than 1,000 were thought to have already left.

Rights protesters scuffled with police and some arrests were reported.

UK Home Secretary Alan Johnson said reports Britain would be forced to take some of the migrants were wrong but that it would help “genuine refugees”.

Resigned

Rights activists initially formed a human chain as the operation began early on Tuesday.

Aerial television pictures showed officers moving unhindered throughout the camp and calmly leading out a line of migrants.

But other shots showed some jostling and scuffling between police and protesters, some of whom were reportedly arrested.

After the camp was cleared, bulldozers were brought in to raze the makeshift shelters.

The chief of Calais police, Pierre de Bousquet de Florian, told reporters the operation had been a success.

He said 146 adults and 132 self-declared minors had been detained. None of those held were female, he said.

The adults were taken into police custody and the minors taken to special centres.

France says all will be offered the chance to apply for asylum or voluntary assisted repatriation.

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]

Culture Wars


Abortion: Spain; Go-Ahead From State Council for New Law

(ANSAmed) — MADRID, SEPTEMBER 18 — Spain’s Council of State gave the go-ahead to the decriminalisation bill proposed by the socialist executive branch of José Luis Zapatero, which allows, among other things, every woman the possibility to decide for an abortion autonomously within the first 14 weeks of pregnancy, reported the Spanish press. The opinion of the council, which is not mandatory, holds that the reform is compatible with the constitution and doesn’t breach one of the most controversial points, the extension of the right to abortion to minors between the age of 16 and 18 without consulting their parents. The State Council, in any case, recommended that parents of the minors that decide to abort “are listened to”. The Minister of Health, Trinidad Jimenez, stated today in an interview with Radio Onda Cero, that he is in favour of keeping the bill in its present form, though it may be subject to a second reading at the ministerial council on September 25. Once approved definitively, the proposal will be able to proceed through parliamentary procedures. Currently abortion in Spain is allowed only in case of rape, deformation of the foetus or health risks to the mother. This last case was claimed by about 98% of women who have had abortions in Spain, without the time limits provided for in the present law. (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Obama Science Chief: Abortion Can Save Planet

John Holdren’s textbook says forced sterilization may become necessary

Despite the claims of some media watchdogs, President Obama’s science czar contended in a textbook he co-authored that involuntary birth-control measures, including forced sterilization, may be necessary and morally acceptable under certain conditions, such as widespread famine brought about by “climate change.”

John Holdren argued in the 1970s college textbook obtained by WND, “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment,” that, “Compulsory control of family size is an unpalatable idea, but the alternatives may be much more horrifying.”

The book, last revised in a 1977 edition, was co-authored with Malthusian population alarmist Paul R. Ehrlich and Ehrlich’s wife, Anne.

The authors also advocated abortion as an acceptable form of population control and proposed that the best survival strategy for a pregnant woman is to abort her baby.

[…]

A close reading of “Ecoscience,” however, shows the authors clearly stated their acceptance of abortion as an effective population-control technique.

“An abortion is clearly preferable to adding one more child to an overburdened family or an overburdened society, where the chances that it will realize its potential are slight,” Holdren and the Erhlichs argued on page 760 of the 1977 edition of “Ecoscience.”

“There is little question that legalized abortion can contribute to a reduction in birth rates,” the authors wrote on page 761. “Liberalization of abortion policies in those countries where it is still largely or entirely illegal is therefore justifiable both on humanitarian and health grounds and as an aid to population control.”

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]

General


Bulgarian Chosen to Head UNESCO

The UN cultural and scientific organisation Unesco has chosen its new leader, former Bulgarian Foreign Minister Irina Bokova.

Ms Bokova beat the favourite, Egyptian Culture Minister Faruq Hosni, whose candidacy had been clouded by allegations of anti-Semitism.

It took five days and five rounds of voting to choose the new Unesco head.

In the end it was down to Ms Bokova and Mr Hosni. In the final round it seems a coalition formed to keep Mr Hosni out.

Mr Hosni, who would have been the first Arab head of Unesco, was always a controversial candidate.

For many years Egypt’s culture minister, he has spoken in the past about the “infiltration of Jews into the international media”.

Last year he said he would be willing to “burn Israeli books in Egyptian libraries”, though he has since apologised for the remark.

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]

Celebrating Eid in the Netherlands

Cultural Enrichment News


Ramadan 2009 has come and gone, and our Flemish correspondent VH has compiled a brief report about the celebration of Eid ul-Fitr in the Netherlands. The following three culturally enriched excerpts are translated from articles in De Telegraaf.

First, from Amsterdam:

Free transport for Muslims in Amsterdam

Muslims in parts of Amsterdam on September 20 were provided with free taxi rides so that they would be able to visit family members during the Islamic Sugar Feast [Dutch euphemism for Eid ul-Fitr].

The municipal [majority Socialist] government decided on this measure to prevent disorder at roadblocks. Amsterdam had a car-free Sunday on September 20, and that is exactly the day of the end of Ramadan, on which Muslims en masse visit each other’s families. On that day almost the entire area within the A10 highway ring was prohibited for motorists.

[Note: On the same day Jewish citizens celebrated Rosh Hashana, but there were no free taxi rides for them.]

The next story, also from Amsterdam, is about trouble at the movies:
– – – – – – – –

Sixty young people thrown out from Amsterdam cinema

On Sunday evening the police evacuated the entire Pathé de Munt cinema in Amsterdam. According to a spokesman, about sixty people, including several dozen youngsters, caused inconvenience. The police eventually arrested three people for defamation, disturbance of the public order, and destruction.

The youngsters were guilty of conduct “that you do not want to have here if you want to watch a film undisturbed,” a police spokesman stated. Officers who were alerted therefore evacuated the entire cinema at around half past eight in the evening. The audience left the building through the side entrance and were then directed to the nearby Rembrandtplein. For the rest of the evening the cinema stayed open to visitors.

It is unclear whether the youngsters were in the cinema to celebrate the end of the fasting month of Ramadan. Traditionally, many Muslim youth go to the movies then. This has previously led to problems in Amsterdam cinemas.

According to a spokesman, the Pathé cinema had deployed extra security. “This happens every year during the Sugar Feast.”

In Rotterdam, there was more trouble at the movies:

Also problems in the Pathé cinema in Rotterdam

In Rotterdam this Sunday evening, the police cleared out dozens of youngsters from the Pathe cinema at the Schouwburgplein [in the city center]. The group threw popcorn around, made noise, and by doing so made it impossible for other visitors to watch the movie. This happened in more than one screening hall.

After being moved out of the cinema, the youths continued being a nuisance in the square in front of the cinema, where they insulted the police and threw objects at them. One [enriched] “Rotterdammer” was arrested for defamation.

The Pathé cinema then closed at 20.30 and stopped screening all movies.

At the Sugar Festival many Muslim youngsters traditionally go to the movies. This has led to problems in the past in cinemas: “The Muslim youths go out then en masse, so it seems logical that here and there some small incidents might occur,” a spokesman for Pathé said.



For a complete listing of previous enrichment news, see The Cultural Enrichment Archives.

Kissing Cousins

This story does not really constitute news for regular Gates of Vienna readers. We’ve all seen the studies about the prevalence of cross-cousin marriage in the Muslim world, and the deleterious effect this has had on the gene pool.

What’s significant about this article is that it was published in the Arab media. This particular text appeared in English, but one assumes that Arabic-language versions are also circulating.

According to Al-Arabiya:

Arabs Suffer From High Rate of Gene Disorders

The report by the Dubai-based Center for Arab Genomic Studies (CAGS) said Arabs have one of the highest rates of genetic disorders mostly related to consanguinity, or marriages between close relatives.

The genetic research institute found that around 63 percent of the genetic conditions found in Arabs, who often practice marriage between relatives, were related to consanguinity and warned the numbers were likely to rise as more research is conducted and more disorders discovered.

In the United Arab Emirates, a country with the fifth highest rate of inter-family marriages, there are currently over 250 types of genetic diseases, the second-highest after neighboring Oman.

“Prevalence of genetic diseases is very high in the UAE compared to the rest of the world, so it is a major concern. It also puts a lot of burden on the government financially. We need to prepare strategies with a special focus on genetics,” Dr. Ghazi Omar Tadmouri, Assistant Director of CAGS, said in a statement.

CAGS has so far completed studies in the UAE, Oman and Bahrain and plans to continue extensive research throughout the Arab world.

Epidemic levels

Reports have found that several genomic diseases such as thalassaemia, a blood disorder, diabetes, breast cancer and Down’s syndrome have reached epidemic levels, more than 100 cases per 100,000, in the three Gulf countries researched so far.

– – – – – – – –

Ghazi said building the database was important as “it gives us a bird’s-eye view of each country on genetic diseases. Some are epidemic and some very rare,” he told the UAE paper The National.

Dr. Anain Yvorra, general director of France’s Eurobiomed, organizer of this year’s Montpellier conference on rare genetic diseases, told Al Arabiya the research done by CAGS would be of great interest to the field of genomic studies.

“The chance of genetic diseases increases with each consanguine marriage between defective gene carriers. A genetic pool with a long history of such marriages would indeed bread [sic] very interesting results.”

He noted however that although most of the diseases recognized by CAGS as epidemics in the UAE, Oman and Bahrain, are genetically related, breast cancer could also have many other triggers.

“Breast cancer could be environmental or emotional as well as genetic.”

The center funded by the Sheikh Hamadan Award form medical sciences states on its website that its vision is “to alleviate human suffering from genetic diseases in the Arab World.”



Hat tip: TB.

Blood Money for a Blood Libeler

Below is a follow-up report and translation by our Swedish correspondent CB about the recent revival of the blood libel in Sweden’s largest newspaper. CB includes this introductory note:

Here’s an interesting update on the Swedish blood libel that Aftonbladet peddled last month about the IDF as virtual organ harvesters. It’s a bizarre irony that the same newspaper — which proudly stated just days ago that they would not be party to xenophobic hatred, and thus would refuse election ads by the Sweden Democrats — has apparently become party to xenophobic hatred against Jews. And that in a part of the world where Jews can get into serious trouble.

Will we now see an advertised editorial about the dangers for a newspaper of going fishing in murky waters, where Aftonbladet will use Donald Boström’s article as an example?

Here’s the post from Gudmundson, translated by CB:
– – – – – – – –

Blood money

Donald Boström, who wrote in Aftonbladet about the alleged Israeli theft of Palestinians organs, has received the Algerian Journalist Association’s honor prize, according to Al Arabiya an equivalent of $5,000. He is on a tour which will also make stops in Egypt, Jordan and Syria.

In Algeria Boström met with several high representatives of the Algerian state, such as Prime Minister Abdelaziz Belkhadem, who praised his journalism.

That shows that Boström is a big inspiration for the Arab world’s journalist corps. For example, Algeria has its own organ-theft story now, the spread of which is investigated by the state’s representatives as part in the brainwashing of the oppressed population (Algeria is in 121st place in the index of press freedom). Al Manar [original in English]:

The organ theft scandal in Israel is likely to have a domino effect as similar crimes by Israeli organizations in the Arab world have been unearthed; an international zionist conspiracy to kidnap Algerian children and harvest their organs.

The story was first reported by Algeria’s Al-Khabar daily which revealed that bands of Moroccans and Algerians have allegedly been roaming the streets of Algeria’s cities kidnapping young children, who are then transported across the border into Morocco. From the Moroccan city of Oujda, the children are then purportedly sold to Israelis and American Jews, who then harvest their organs for sale in Israel and the United States. The organs are said to fetch anywhere from $20,000 to $100,000.

Dr. Mustafa Khayatti, head of the Algerian National Committee for the Development of Health Research, has linked the crime to the group of pro-Israeli US politicians and rabbis who were arrested recently in New York. But Khayati warned that although “these Jewish organ trafficking gangs have been arrested, other such gangs remain active in several Arab countries.” The Iranian Press TV linked the gang to Israeli Rabbi Levi Rosenbaum who was recently arrested in New Jersey for his direct role in illegal human organs trade.

Most likely Åsa Lindeborg is feeling proud that her culture page’s story — which she herself admits doesn’t hold water — now feeds into anti-Semitism in the entire Arab world.

A Culturally Enriched Courtroom Battle

Cultural Enrichment News


A number of “youths” are on trial in Copenhagen, charged with attempting to kill a member of the Danish chapter of Hells Angels at his tattoo parlor.

When the trial began, culturally enriched friends of the accused were on hand to yell, threaten, and assault anyone who interfered with them or gave them negative coverage in the press. Needless to say, when the friends of the Hells Angels arrived, they were not at all meek and passive in the face of all that concentrated enrichment.

According to Politiken:

Bikers and Youths Battle at Court

Fighting breaks out in front of Copenhagen Municipal Court which is hearing a case against youths who shot at a Hells Angel tattooist.

There have been tumultuous scenes outside the Copenhagen Municipal Court where youths used café fixtures as missiles, as the court inside dealt with a case involving immigrant youths charged with attempting to kill a Hells Angel.

Trouble broke out when members of the Hells Angels support group AK81 and immigrant youths arrived at the courthouse on Nytorv in Copenhagen.

Police action

– – – – – – – –

“Café tables and chairs were thrown but no-one was seriously injured and we have not arrested anyone,” the Duty Police Officer tells Ritzau.

Friends of those on trial also threatened journalists sent to cover the trial, but a police operation prevented the situation developing.

Bat and missiles

According to an eyewitness, a group of some eight young immigrant youths were waiting in front of the courthouse when five aggressive and vociferous bikers rounded the corner.

“The biker-types went straight onto the attack at the group in front of the courthouse with a baseball bat, chairs and tables — but the youths counterattacked,” Ritzau quotes the witness as saying.

After a short battle, both groups are reported to have run off.

Attack

Inside the courthouse, the first major case in the Copenhagen gang war had come to trial.

Two young gang members are accused of shooting at a Hells Angels-related clothing and tattooist business in Nørrebro last September. The young men shot through the window of the shop from a scooter, grazing the manager’s neck.



For a complete listing of previous enrichment news, see The Cultural Enrichment Archives.

Hat tip: TB.

Why Did Europeans Create the Modern World? — Part 2

The Fjordman Report


The noted blogger Fjordman is filing this report via Gates of Vienna.
For a complete Fjordman blogography, see The Fjordman Files. There is also a multi-index listing here.

Part 1 of this series was published here.



Michael H. Hart evaluates the accomplishments of various civilizations. He claims that the contributions of the ancient Egyptians were quite meager. The Sumerians invented writing first, which the Egyptians may well have been aware of. They made no significant contributions to astronomical theory, nor to physics, chemistry, biology or geology. The Egyptian political structure was an absolute monarchy, which was not an original idea and did not influence modern thinkers. While the pyramids are certainly very visually impressive, the pyramid is strictly speaking a simple architectural structure and for the most part not a very useful one. Why are the contributions of the ancient Egyptians so overrated? Because the climate in Egypt is so dry, the architecture (and the mummies) they created survive better there than elsewhere. Their monuments are still visible. Hart is not in any way claiming that the ancient Egyptians were savages, only that their contributions are frequently overrated.

Personally, I think he slights the Egyptians somewhat. It is true that they were not very scientifically advanced, and Greek art during the Hellenic and Hellenistic periods was lifelike to an extent which Egyptian art never was, but the Greeks were inspired by Egyptian temple architecture and by their studies of the proportions of the human body. As art historian Gombrich says, “the Greek masters went to school with the Egyptians, and we are all the pupils of the Greeks.” Here is how the American writer Lawrence Auster puts it:

“Let’s remember to give the Egyptians credit for first developing the beautiful human form, which the Greeks then adopted and made more alive. Camille Paglia is mostly silly, but be sure to read the first chapter of her book Sexual Personae, where she discusses the Egyptian creation of the clear, perfect, ‘Apollonian’ form which became the basis of Western art….For the Greeks, natural form conveys the divine. So they weren’t just being ‘naturalistic,’ i.e., true to nature. They saw nature as so beautiful because they saw nature as informed by a perfect harmony. That’s where the incredible sensitiveness of the Athenian fifth century sculptures comes from. In a sense, the artists of the Athenian Golden Age were expressing in stone what Homer had expressed centuries earlier in poetry: those special moments in life when the hero ‘seemed like something more than man.’ Or like the scene in the Iliad (Book III, 156-58) where the old men on the wall of Troy see Helen approach, and say to each other: ‘Surely there is no blame on Trojans and strong-greaved Achaians, If for long time they suffer hardship for a woman like this one. Terrible is the likeness of her face to immortal goddesses.’“

In science, the ancient Greeks easily outperformed the Egyptians. Greek deductive geometry turned out to be an indispensable prelude to the advent of modern science, and apart from mathematics and astronomy they made great contributions in poetry, history, drama and mythology, produced elegant architecture such as the Parthenon in Athens as well as great sculptors and painters. The works of Plato and Aristotle are among the oldest analytical writings on political theory. If people in the twenty-first century read Aristotle’s Politics to see what it says about democracy, this is not just out of historical curiosity but because this is considered relevant today. In contrast, virtually nobody reads “Pharaonic” political theory.

Why did the ancient Greeks achieve so much? Possibly the geography of Greece made them a seafaring nation and led them to engage in exploration and trade. Yet there were many other peoples who enjoyed a similar geographic advantage, too, and the Phoenicians, while being great seafarers and traders, did not create anything near the scientific achievements of the Greeks according to historical evidence. Hart believes that while other Europeans had at least as high IQ as the Greeks, science is above all the creation of urban, literate cultures, and in this the Greeks benefited from early contact with the literate civilizations of the Middle East:

“The best explanation for the Greek phenomenon lies in a combination of genetic and geographic factors. The peoples living in the cold regions of Europe had, over a period of many millennia, evolved higher average intelligence than the peoples living in the Middle East. However, because of the mild climate in the Middle East, and the availability of a large assortment of useful domesticable plants and animals, the inhabitants of the Middle East developed agriculture long before the peoples of northern Europe. The early advent of agriculture and cities in the Middle East enabled them to make major progress during the Neolithic Era and the early historic era, and to get a big jump on the rest of the world in technology and in intellectual matters. In time, the superior genetic endowment of the Europeans would enable them to overcome that head start. However, between European groups, the one most likely to advance first was the one which had the earliest opportunity of learning from the civilizations of the Middle East and Egypt. Because of their geographic location, the Greeks were the first European people to come into contact with those civilizations.”

In Understanding Human History, Michael H. Hart also evaluates the Islamic world. He says, correctly, that non-Muslim dhimmis under Islamic rule were hardly even second-rate citizens, but rather non-citizens who lacked many basic civil rights. For example, they could not testify in court against a Muslim. He disputes whether conversion to Islam were always “voluntary,” given the various humiliations, pressures and taxes non-Muslims continuously had to face just for the sake of being non-Muslims. Regarding cultural achievements, he mentions some noteworthy scholars and figures. One is the Moroccan Berber explorer and writer Ibn Batutta (1304-1369), who traveled from West Africa via southeastern Europe and India to China in the fourteenth century and described his experiences in his book Rihlah (Travels).

Ibn Khaldun could be mentioned for his work in historiography, although he shared the contempt for all non-Muslim cultures which hampered the growth of archaeology and comparative linguistics in the Islamic world. Muslim scholars did not seriously study other cultures with curiosity and describe them with fairness, the Persian universal scholar al-Biruni’s (973-1048) writings about Hinduism and India being one of very few exceptions to this rule. He had taken the trouble to learn enough Sanskrit to be able to translate in both directions between this language and Arabic (for him also a learned language). As author John Keay writes in his book India: A History, Muslims were viewed by Indians as just another group of foreigners, perhaps annoying but essentially marginal. This was a big mistake:
– – – – – – – –
“There is no evidence of an Indian appreciation of the global threat which they represented; and the peculiar nature of their mission — to impose a new monotheist orthodoxy by military conquest and political dominion — was so alien to Indian tradition that it went uncomprehended. No doubt a certain complacency contributed to this indifference. As al-Biruni (Alberuni), the great Islamic scholar of the eleventh century, would put it, ‘the Hindus believe that there is no country but theirs, no science like theirs.’…his scientific celebrity in the Arab world would owe much to his mastery of Sanskrit and access to Indian scholarship….Unlike Alexander’s Greeks, Muslim invaders were well aware of India’s immensity, and mightily excited by its resources….Since at least Roman times the subcontinent seems to have enjoyed a favourable balance of payments….The devout Muslim, although ostensibly bent on converting the infidel, would find his zeal handsomely rewarded.”

Personally, I wouldn’t say that absolutely no achievements were made in the medieval Islamic world, only that they are greatly exaggerated for political reasons today. Let us divide scholars into three categories: Category 1 consists of those who make minor contributions, category 2 medium-level ones. Category 3 consists of scholars who make major, fundamental contributions to an important branch of science. Not a single scholar of this stature has ever been produced in the Islamic world even at the best of times. Finding some Muslim scholars who made minor contributions to mathematics, medicine or alchemy is not difficult, and I can probably name half a dozen to a dozen individuals who might qualify under category 2, for instance alKhwarizmi, Omar Khayyam, Rhazes, Geber and perhaps Avicenna and Averroes.

Hart says that Alhazen was “probably the greatest” of all the scholars in the Islamic world, which I agree with, but even he was a good scholar in category 2, not 3. Muslim original contributions to engineering were minor and they do not appear to have equalled the achievements of the Romans. He notes that the mediocre contributions of Middle Easterners are all the more striking given their geographically favorable position, which gave them the unique opportunity to gain knowledge from all major Eurasian civilizations simultaneously.

According to Hart, Middle Eastern scholars made few major discoveries in mathematics and science, medicine or engineering, certainly nothing comparable to printing and gunpowder in China in the Early Middle Ages or spectacles and mechanical clocks in Western Europe during the High Middle Ages. While they did produce, for a while, a number of scholars who made minor contributions and a handful or two who made medium-level contributions, they never produced truly great geniuses such as Aristotle, Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler or Newton. Hart attributes this primarily to their lower IQ compared to Europeans, although I would personally add the repressive atmosphere created by Islamic orthodoxy as a contributing factor as well. Ideas have consequences.

Michael H. Hart writes about India, by which he means the entire Indian subcontinent, which has been affected by several human migrations/invasions from the northwest. At its peak between 2500 and 2000 BC, the Indus Valley or Harappan civilization close to Sumerian Mesopotamia in the northwest was larger and more advanced than anything we know from China during the same time period. It is noteworthy that civilization originated in the far north of India, in a region that was geographically and maybe genetically more closely attached to the civilizations of the Middle East than to South India, which remained more backward than North India for a long time. Hart believes that the peculiar caste system in India originally had a racial component and dates back to the Indo-European invasion of lighter-skinned peoples from the north and northwest. The only large empires ruled by native Indians were the Mauryan and Gupta empires, and these endured for a combined total of less than 400 years.

Hart devotes considerable space to arts and literature. The Rigveda is a collection of hymns composed between 1500 and 1200 BC; the Upanishads from around 900-500 BC are prose commentaries on the Vedas. The two most famous works of epic poetry are the Ramayana and the Mahabharata. India has produced a great deal of lyric poetry and theater has been a major art form there, as it was in ancient Greece, for many centuries; Kalidasa from the fifth century AD has a position within Sanskrit literature comparable to that of Shakespeare in English literature. India has a long tradition of sophisticated music and musical theory, painting and above all sculpture, but Indian music and literature is not widely followed elsewhere in the world, at least outside of Southeast Asia. India was strong in the arts but weaker in science and technology, with the partial exception of mathematics.

Buddhism was a local religion until about 250 BC when the Emperor Ashoka (304-232 BC) converted and promoted the spread of this religion in India and far beyond. Buddhism was of limited importance in a global perspective, but it had a great influence in Asia and easily trumped any ideologies developed in China. Chinese philosophies such as Confucianism and Taoism had some impact among China’s immediate neighbors, the Koreans, the Japanese and the Vietnamese, but little in other regions. The Chinese will no doubt say that this is because they do not impose their ways on others, but given China’s size and the fact that it was for centuries the world’s largest economy, the Chinese ideological impact abroad must be described as surprisingly limited. According to Thomas T. Allsen in Culture and Conquest in Mongol Eurasia, “Almost all of the major religious movements originating in the Middle East — Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Christianity, Manichaeanism, and Islam — reached China, while Chinese ideological systems made no inroads in the West. This intriguing and persistent pattern, which has never been explained, was apparently established quite early.”

As Michael H. Hart sums up, “no other non-European civilization has produced nearly the variety of high-quality literature, music, and art that India has. The mathematical knowledge of the ancient Greeks was eventually transmitted to India. However, the only important advance made by Hindu mathematicians was the invention of positional notation, which greatly simplifies arithmetic operations. Positional notation was probably invented about 700 AD; however, the first complete description is by Bhaskara, about 1150 AD. Prior to the modern era, Indians do not appear to have made significant contributions to science; nor did any important inventions come from India. The Indian subcontinent produced a thriving civilization, and in pre-modern times its culture was incomparably more sophisticated than that of backward regions such as Australia or sub-Saharan Africa.”

Let us consider the case of China. The Chinese were convinced of their superiority to all other nations and kept careful historical records. The most celebrated Chinese historian of ancient times was the palace eunuch Sima Qian (ca. 145-86 BC) during the Han Dynasty, who had an enormous influence on later Chinese historiography and on how the Chinese view their own civilization. His great work Records of the Grand Historian “is generally considered to be superior to anything written by European historians before modern times,” according to Hart.

As Bruce G. Trigger states in his fine A History of Archaeological Thought, second edition, Confucian Imperial scholars in China stressed the past as a guide to moral behavior and made historical studies an important component of the unifying Chinese culture. Bronze vessels and jade carvings from the ancient Shang Dynasty were treasured as prestige objects the way ancient vases or statues were viewed in the Classical Mediterranean. Yet the Chinese did not develop a specific corpus of techniques for recovering and studying such artifacts comparable to European archaeology. Even the Greeks and Romans did not do this; they could collect ancient works of art, but they did not develop a systematic science dedicated to the study of physical remains from the past. According to Trigger,

“Wealthy Romans admired the works of talented Greek artists and sought to purchase the originals or good copies of them. This interest inspired the Roman author Pliny the Elder’s (AD 23-79) historical account of Greek art and artists. Yet, despite a growing interest in ancient works of art, scholars made no effort to recover or collect such artifacts systematically, nor, with the notable exception of a few works, such as that of Pliny on art, did artifacts become a specialized focus of analysis….Educated Greeks and Romans were aware that the culture of the remote past was different from that of the present and valued the fine art works from earlier times as collectibles. Yet, they did not develop a sense that these objects could be used as a basis for learning more about the past, as written records and oral traditions were being used.”

There was a general gap between theory and practice in Greek science and a strong dislike among intellectuals for studying mundane objects. Archaeology was created in early modern Europe, beginning with the growth of antiquarians from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. The influential German antiquary Johann Winckelmann (1717-1768) carefully studied Greco-Roman art and is sometimes called “the first archaeologist.” However, while his comparative work represented a great step forward in the systematic study of the past, he was not interested in the everyday life of the ancients and studied objects removed from their archaeological context. “Hence, in many ways, the claim that he was the founder of art history may be even more appropriate than the claim that he was the father of classical archaeology. Winckelmann clearly was responsible for establishing a close and lasting relation between classical studies and what was to become the separate discipline of art history.”

The eighteenth century witnessed more systematic archaeological excavations, especially at the buried Roman sites of Herculaneum and Pompeii near Naples, Italy, but prehistoric archaeology was born with the scholar Christian Jürgensen Thomsen(1788-1865) from Denmark in the early 1800s. Although he was inspired by earlier ideas and Enlightenment ideals, it was Thomsen who developed the highly influential Three Age system (Stone Age, Bronze Age and Iron Age). During the Napoleonic Wars the Danish fleet had been destroyed by the British, so Danes needed national consolation and reassurance in their past. His importance is often underrated in historical accounts, but “Thomson’s work constituted the chronological breakthrough that set the study of prehistory on a scientific basis. His work was as fundamental for the development of prehistoric archaeology as were the major theoretical discoveries in historical geography and biology during the nineteenth century.”

Compared with the West the Chinese were a conspicuously practical people who had relatively little interest in pure mathematics or theology and no European-style religious wars. They made many useful practical inventions, from papermaking, block printing, the magnetic compass, cast iron, porcelain, wheelbarrows and canal lock gates to the use of coal as fuel.

As writing material, bamboo was cumbersome and silk was expensive. With the invention of paper, China had a better and cheaper writing material than anything used anywhere else in the world, although a certain type of bark paper books were made by the Maya and others in pre-Columbian Mesoamerica. Hart believes that the introduction of paper partly explains why China was so dynamic in the period which corresponds to the Early Middle Ages in Europe. In contrast, the famous Great Wall of China is somewhat overrated. Author Julia Lovell explains in the book The Great Wall: China Against the World, 1000 BC — AD 2000:

“Wall-building was in general an unpopular choice because it was associated with defeat and political collapse, with short-lived imperial houses such as the brutal Qin (221-206 BC) — the first regime to erect a more or less continuous barrier across northern China — or the Sui (581-618). And the Great Wall simply hasn’t worked that well as a barrier to protect China from marauding barbarians. Ever since walls were first built across Chinese frontiers, they have provided no more than a temporary advantage over determined raiders and pillagers. When Genghis Khan and his Mongol hordes conquered China in the thirteenth century AD, frontier walls proved little obstacle. The Great Wall offered no protection to the greatest wall-builders of all, the Ming dynasty, from their most threatening adversaries, the Manchus of the north-east, who ruled China as the Qing dynasty from 1644. Invaders could make detours around strong defences until they found weaknesses and gaps or, less effortfully, simply bribe Chinese officials to open the Great Wall forts. When the Manchus decided to make their final move on Beijing in 1644, they were let through a Great Wall pass by a disaffected Chinese general.”

The Great Wall could be compared to the Maginot Line, the elaborate system of concrete bunkers, tunnels and machine gun posts which France had constructed along its eastern borders following World War I. These expensive fortifications provided little effective defense for the French as the Germans during WW2 circumvented it and invaded France, anyway. When the Chinese built their Great Wall they spent a very large amount of financial and human resources on something that was, in the end, not very effective. When the Chinese invented paper and printed paper books they changed the course of human history. Sometimes the most visually spectacular creation is not necessarily the most historically important one.

An impressive feat of Chinese engineering which actually worked as intended was the Grand Canal, which has later been extended and now stretches from Beijing to the city of Hangzhou, roughly 1,770 km. The Japanese Buddhist pilgrim and writer Ennin (ca. 794-864), who is better known in Japan as Jikaku Daishi, was one of the many visitors who were impressed by the sheer size of the Grand Canal. Nevertheless, in architecture “The Chinese were relatively late in making use of the arch and the dome; and although they did build many attractive homes and other buildings, they did not construct anything that rivals the Parthenon in Athens, Hagia Sophia in Constantinople, or the magnificent cathedrals of medieval Europe.”

In sharp contrast to the impressive list of great practical inventions was the relative sparseness of major Chinese achievements in science and mathematics. They suffered from a general lack of interest in theory in the sciences. For instance, the Chinese were diligent in keeping astronomical records, but they never created any elaborate theoretical structure and never deduced that the Earth was round. Their failure to do so made significant progress in astronomy difficult. In 1600 AD, Chinese astronomy was at least 2000 years behind the West. The Chinese made no major contributions to physics, chemistry or geology, either.

During politically strong periods China expanded into neighboring territories in the immediate south and west, especially Xinjiang and Central Asia as well as Vietnam. There were some exceptions, mainly related to the introduction of Buddhism when some scholars went to India, but in general the Chinese showed little interest in exploration beyond this. There were the famous naval expeditions in the Indian Ocean during the Ming Dynasty in the early fifteenth century AD led by men such as the admiral Zheng He (1371-1433), which reached as far as the east coast of Africa. Yet the whole reason why these expeditions have generated so much attention is precisely because they constituted a rare event. The project happened comparatively late and was eventually discontinued. Claims that the Chinese reached the Americas before Christopher Columbus in 1492 are not convincing. If anything, they would have brought Eurasian crowd diseases, which means that many of the Native American peoples would in that case have died from smallpox even before the first Europeans got there.

The Chinese produced many beautiful landscape paintings, great calligraphy and a very extensive literature in philosophy, poetry, fiction and history. Relatively few of these works are widely read by non-Chinese today, one of them being the Tao Te Ching (“The Classic of the Way and its Power”) ascribed to Lao Tzu or Laozi, considered to be the founder of Taoism, some Confucian classics and above all The Art of War by Sun Tzu, by universal acclaim the greatest treatise on the psychology of warfare ever written in any language.

No practical inventions of comparable importance to paper, printing or gunpowder were ever made in the Islamic world. Moreover, virtually all of the admirable features of this civilization were created by the Chinese themselves, whereas Muslims relied heavily on knowledge generated by others, the ancient Greeks, Byzantines, Persians, Hindus and Chinese. Michael H. Hart rates Chinese civilization as the only one that rivals European civilization:

“The Chinese — virtually unaided by outsiders — created a complex and complete civilization, with a smoothly functioning government, and multitudinous achievements in technology, construction, literature, the arts, and philosophy. They had a wide variety of skilled craftsmen; they maintained large, powerful armies; and they created a school system, a network of roads, an elaborate (and delicious) cuisine, and all the other attributes of a sophisticated civilization. In general, the Chinese enjoyed more internal unity than Europe. Europe has usually consisted of many independent states, often fighting one another. In contrast, China has usually been politically unified. Between 600 and 1300 AD, China was clearly more prosperous than the West. Because of this, it has often been asserted that (until the rise of modern science in the last five centuries) China was usually more advanced than the West. However, that assertion is incorrect. In the first place, even during that period, China was far behind the West in mathematics and science. In the second place, the interval 600-1300 AD was atypical. For most of recorded history — and for most of the last ten thousand years — China has been well behind the Western world in both technology and the arts.”

But still there were no Chinese equivalents to Copernicus, Newton, Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, Columbus or Magellan. In the ancient world, there were none to Pythagoras, Archimedes, Euclid, Hipparchus or Ptolemy, either.

During the unusually dynamic Song Dynasty (960-1279) they issued the first banknotes (paper money) and recorded the first known use of gunpowder and the magnetic compass. According to Arnold Pacey in Technology in World Civilization, “In 1100, China was undoubtedly the most technically ‘advanced’ region in the world, particularly with regard to the use of coke in iron smelting, canal transport and farm implements. Bridge design and textile machinery had also been developing rapidly. In all these fields, there were techniques in use in eleventh-century China which had no parallel in Europe until around 1700.”

However, the painful practice of footbinding, which lasted well into the twentieth century and affected countless Chinese women, began during the Song Dynasty and spread rapidly from the tenth or eleventh centuries onward. Confucian scholars found nothing objectionable about this. J. M. Roberts’ The New Penguin History of the World is somewhat dismissive of the negative impact of Islamic Jihad but is still worth reading. As Roberts indicates, the history of women is often obscured by the bias of the documentation, but in China especially so:

“We hear little of them, even in literature, except in sad little poems and love stories. Yet presumably they must have made up about half of the population, or perhaps slightly less, for in hard times girl babies were exposed by poor families to die. That fact, perhaps, characterizes women’s place in China until very recent times even better than the more familiar and superficially striking practice of foot-binding, which produced grotesque deformations and could leave a high-born lady almost incapable of walking. Another China still all but excluded from the historical evidence by the nature of the established tradition was that of the peasants. They become shadowly visible only as numbers in the census returns and as eruptions of revolt; after the Han pottery figures, there is little in Chinese art to reveal them, and certainly nothing to match the uninterrupted (and often idealized) recording of the life of the common man in the fields, which runs from medieval European illumination, through the vernacular literature to the Romantics, and into the peasant subjects of the early Impressionists.”

All this does not mean that the rest of Asia was technologically primitive, but China’s role was disproportionate. What came from China to the West? Professor Derk Bodde lists a number of ideas and innovations from porcelain, tea, paper and gunpowder to dominoes, playing cards and the shadow play. Lacquer, like silk, is one of the products longest known in China. It comes from the sap of a tree which is native to China and is used to paint decorative designs on wooden boxes and other objects. European agricultural production was greatly improved after the arrival agricultural tools such as the moldboard plow. The Dutch and other Europeans saw that the Chinese plough did not suit their type of soil, but Chinese and Asian prototypes stimulated them to produce new designs, rockets and winnowing machines.

Even though you can find a number of practical innovations that came to the West from China, very few theoretical scientific ideas came from East Asia. Moreover, it would be fair to say that by now China owes much more science and technology to the West than vice versa. Arnold Pacey admits that “…the most significant developments in Asia were the technical books published in Japan during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, a handful of Chinese scientific works, and very occasional episodes in India such as the use of models in the design of the Taj Mahal in the 1630s, and the systematic use of scale drawings by some shipbuilders by the end of the eighteenth century. But such examples are few and isolated. The great preponderance of new technological potential generated by increased ability to conceptualize technical problems was accruing in the West.”

Geographic factors contributed to the early cultural and political unification of China, which was difficult in the more rugged terrain of Europe. As Jared Diamond states in Guns, Germs, and Steel, the “Sinifaction” of East Asia “involved the drastic homogenization of a huge region” and the repopulation of tropical Southeast Asia by people of Chinese origins:

“Some developments spread from south to north in China, especially iron smelting and rice cultivation. But the predominant direction of spread was from north to south. That trend is clearest for writing…All three of China’s first three dynasties, the Xia and Shang and Zhou Dynasties, arose in North China in the second millennium B.C. Preserved writings of the first millennium B.C. show that ethnic Chinese already tended then (as many still do today) to feel culturally superior to non-Chinese ‘barbarians,’ while North Chinese tended to regard even South Chinese as barbarians.”

Although Southeast Asia was originally populated by dark-skinned peoples comparable to some New Guinean groups, only a few New Guinean-like populations remain in this region today, among them the Negritos living in mountainous areas of the Philippines. The rest have been more or less completely eradicated. As Diamond writes, “The historical southward expansions of Burmese, Laotians, and Thais from South China completed the Sinification of tropical Southeast Asia. All those modern peoples are recent offshoots of their South Chinese cousins. So overwhelming was this Chinese steamroller that the former peoples of tropical Southeast Asia have left behind few traces in the region’s modern populations.”

Regarding the Indo-European expansion, Michael H. Hart supports the hypothesis championed by scholars like the archeologist Marija Gimbutas (1921-1994), born in Vilnius, Lithuania and later based in the USA, in believing that the original PIE homeland was in the region of southern Ukraine and Russia north of the Black Sea. Gimbutas identified the early speakers of PIE with the so-called Kurgan people who lived there after 4000 BC. These people got their name from the low mounds, kurgans, where they often buried their dead. Speakers of an early Indo-European branch which would evolve into Greek probably entered Greece from the north between 2200-2000 BC, when we can find traces indicating a disruptive intrusion in the archaeological record. The ancient Greeks themselves referred to an earlier people (the Pelasgians) who had lived in Greece before them, although he exact nature of these people and their culture is still a matter of contention. How can we explain the spread of the Indo-European languages into so many different regions and forms of terrain?

“The simplest explanation is that the original speakers of PIE possessed, on average, considerably higher intelligence than most of the peoples they defeated (including the Egyptians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Carthaginians, Phoenicians, Pelasgians, Tartessians, Iberians, Etruscans, Berbers, and Dravidian-speaking peoples), all of whom had evolved in milder climates than had the ancestors of the Indo-Europeans. This hypothesis has the added advantage of also applying to the modern expansion of the Indo-Europeans, and it also explains their remarkable intellectual achievements. No other hypothesis comes close to explaining all of these phenomena.”

While the basic premise could be correct, I personally find this a little simplistic since the Indo-European languages also displaced the native tongues of the northern peoples, who presumably had at least as high IQ as the Ukrainians. The only surviving pre-IE language on the entire European continent is believed to be Basque. The Basque people inhabit the Pyrenees in northern Spain and southwestern France. Their tongue has no known relatives and contains words for axe and other tools which carry the root meaning “stone.” It is perhaps a direct descendant of the languages spoken in some regions of Europe during the Stone Age. Does this mean that the Basque had uniquely high IQs since their language alone survived?

In this age of DNA analysis, some earlier findings of comparative linguistics can be confirmed through genetics. In 2008, Fox News reported that a Cornell University-led study found that white (European) Americans are genetically weaker and less diverse than their black compatriots. This follows the first rule of Political Correctness, which says that there are no significant genetic differences between different groups of people, and if there are, whites must always be inferior. I’m glad our weak genes didn’t prevent Europeans from producing individuals such as Galileo, Copernicus, Newton, Beethoven and Pasteur.

The study showed that genetic diversity was greatest among Africans and smallest among Native Americans. This is consistent with the fact that North and South America were the last major landmasses to be settled by humans. The study also showed that the Basques are not closely related genetically to anyone else. Judged by a combination of linguistic and genetic evidence, the Basque people have a strong claim to being the oldest distinct nation in Europe.

Throughout history, most of the instances where people from one region have conquered another have involved “northerners” invading more southerly lands. China has never been conquered by the populous nations south of it but has been repeatedly attacked from the north. On two occasions — the Mongols and the Manchus — northern invaders conquered all of China. Within China itself, it was the northerners who first created a unified country by conquering southern China. India, despite its large population, has never invaded the lands north of it, but has itself been repeatedly invaded from the north and northwest. The three Indian dynasties which came closest to ruling the entire subcontinent (the Mauryas, the Guptas and the Mughals) all originated in the north. According to Hart, “The obvious — and, I believe, the correct — explanation for the military superiority of the northerly peoples is the higher average intelligence of those peoples compared with the inhabitants of more tropical regions.”

Michael H. Hart admits that the Muslim conquests constitute a major counter-example to this general rule. It is true that Muslims never managed to establish lasting control over Europe, as they did in North Africa and the Middle East, but the impact of Islamic Jihad over many centuries on the nations of southern Europe was far from marginal. Regarding the Mongols, as soon as they left the dry and colder region of the mountains, both warriors and horses weakened and grew sick. They failed to adapt their successful strategies based on horses to the sea, and never conquered most of India and Southeast Asia. Their conquest of Iran and Iraq but defeat by the Egyptian Mamluks in 1260 cannot be attributed to differences in IQ.

Some would say that the mass immigration of many low-IQ peoples to white majority Western nations at the turn of the twenty-first century is another major counter-example, but this development constitutes such an anomaly in world history that it must be treated as a special case. Western nations have not been military defeated. These immigrants/colonists would not have been able to settle in these countries if they couldn’t exploit the deranged altruism and political-ideological flaws of the modern West, and they have always received substantial aid from high-IQ groups within the West itself, among them white Marxists.

Scandinavian (Norse) Vikings dominated much of northern Europe from the late eighth century on, trading as well as plundering. At home they were free farmers. The Viking Age ended in the eleventh century AD when they faced stronger states abroad and Christianization at home, at which point Scandinavia became integrated into the Christian civilization of Europe. From Sweden they often went down the rivers in Eastern Europe to the Black Sea and Kiev and founded what would later become the Russian state. Norwegians went to Scotland, Ireland and the North Atlantic. Dublin was the richest of the Norse colonies in Ireland.

The Viking impact was especially strong in the British Isles, destructive but also transformative. From Denmark they raided and settled in Normandy and Brittany. The northeastern and central parts of England where the Vikings settled became known as the Danelaw because Danish laws and customs, not English, prevailed there. Scholars argue that some legal institutions such as the ancestor of the modern grand jury may have originated in the Danelaw. Danegeld was an English tax levied to buy off the Danish invaders. The Danish King Canute the Great (ca. 990-1035) ruled much of England in the early eleventh century.

Charles “the Simple” III (879-929) of France in 911 signed a treaty with the Viking leader Rollo for what would become Normandy (French: Normandie) along the English Channel coast of northern France. The Vikings (“Northmen”) were given this territory in the hope that they would fend off future Viking raids against France. Their descendants of mixed French and Norse origins, the Normans, would successfully conquer England in 1066.

The causes of the Viking expansion are still not known, but their ships were certainly a critical factor in this story. They were perhaps the fastest craft in the world at that time. Scandinavia and the Baltic Sea was originally one of the most remote regions of Europe, far removed from the Mediterranean-dominated Roman civilization. Rock carvings from before 1500 BC demonstrate that boat-building was known in the region at least at this time, but there is no depiction of a mast or sail. Oared vessels are depicted quite early in the Nordic countries, but the first depictions of sailing vessels come from the Swedish island of Gotland as late as around AD 600. Soon after this they developed remarkably fast and manoeuvrable sailed-and-rowed ships that could also be used on rivers, allowed them to carry out trade as well as raids and to get away without being overtaken to the slower ships of the locals.

The great rivers that criss-cross the European Peninsula provided a network of routes linking the ocean interfaces together. Not all rivers were easily navigable, but with some effort it was possible to haul even large vessels overland between navigable waterways and around rapids. The Vikings were not the first Europeans to do this; the ancient Greek geographer Strabo mentioned it centuries earlier. Nevertheless, their uniquely mobile longships have become the symbol of the Viking Age. Else Roesdahl explains in the book The Vikings: Revised Edition:

“A reliable description of the main type used in Scandinavia, and some insight into its specialization, can be given on the basis of the many ships and fragments discovered. This main type has also been found in England and in the Slav regions south of the Baltic, with local modifications. It was probably introduced in both places as the result of Scandinavian influence. The ships which William the Conqueror, a Viking descendant, had built for his invasion of England in 1066 were of the same type. The finds also tell us that within Scandinavia ships varied according to local natural conditions, and there is evidence that they developed technically during the Viking Age. Sails seem to have been introduced during the centuries preceding the Viking Age, although sailing ships had then been used in Western Europe for many hundreds of years. In Scandinavia sailing ships rapidly attained a level of sophistication that was outstanding for their time. Without sails, the Vikings’ far-flung exploits would have been impossible. Many of the ships are now dated by dendrochronology. The best-preserved and the most famous Viking ships are the magnificent Norwegian burial ships from Oseberg and Gokstad in Vestfold.”

Dendrochronology (tree-ring dating) shows that the well-preserved Oseberg ship was buried in AD 834. The Gokstad ship was found beneath a burial mound at a farm in Vestfold and excavated in 1880. It is 24 meters long, 5 meters wide and very seaworthy. Both ships can be seen on display in the Viking Ship Museum in Oslo, Norway. Tønsberg in Vestfold County was probably founded in the 800s and is one of the oldest still-existing towns in Scandinavia. The trading center Hedeby in southern Denmark flourished from the eighth to the eleventh centuries. Birka west of present-day Stockholm in Sweden was linked via the Baltic and the rivers of Eastern Europe to the Black Sea, the Byzantine Empire and the Abbasid Caliphate. The Norse referred to impressive Constantinople as Miklagard (“the Great City”).

After making long journeys where they had to fight off enemies at every point, it is not surprising that Scandinavians at this time earned a reputation as fierce, determined warriors. As Timothy Gregory says in A History of Byzantium, the Byzantine Empire suffered from a decline in its conscript army. Because of this, “the state had to rely more and more on foreign mercenaries, at first Varangians from Russia but increasingly Normans from Sicily and France, Anglo-Saxons from England, and others. The most famous of these was the Varangian Duzina, attested from 1034 onward, which enrolled Vikings from Russia and eventually Anglo-Saxons. This elite guard, whose members had distinct arms and uniforms, had its quarters in Constantinople but also took part in field campaigns.”

The Varangian Guard, who were recognized for the massive battle-axes that they wielded as well as for their drunkenness, defended Constantinople during the shameful Fourth Crusade in 1204. One of their prominent members was the future king Harald Hardråde (1015-1066), “Hard-ruler,” whose story was told by Icelandic poet and historian Snorri Sturluson (1178-1241) in the Heimskringla. Harald participated in a number of battles against Muslims and returned to Norway with great wealth. He wasn’t the only one to do so. Many Byzantine gold coins and Islamic silver coins have been found in Scandinavia. He is most remembered for his invasion of England with several hundred longships. Hardråde was killed at the Battle of Stamford Bridge in England in 1066. The victor Harold Godwinson (ca. 1022-1066) was himself defeated by William the Conqueror (ca. 1027-1087) and his Normans at the Battle of Hastings the same year. This story has been immortalized in the beautiful Bayeux Tapestry.

The Norse explorer Leif Eriksson, or Ericson (ca. 975-ca.1020), son of the Norwegian outlaw Erik the Red who had founded two Norse colonies on Greenland, was probably the first European to land in North America. Research done in the 1950s and 1960s by the Norwegian explorer Helge Ingstad (1899-2001) and his archaeologist wife Anne Stine Ingstad (1918-1997) identified a medieval Norse settlement located at Newfoundland in eastern Canada.

As author Barry Cunliffe states in Europe Between the Oceans, “The Scandinavian diaspora of the eighth to tenth centuries was a remarkable phenomenon, quite unprecedented in its magnitude. At the moment that Swedish Vikings were crossing the Caspian Sea on their way to trade in Baghdad, Norwegians were sailing down the coast of Labrador looking for suitable land to settle in America. The Scandinavians were the first Europeans to have sailed in all of Europe’s seas.”

The only pre-modern oceanic exploration that can match the Viking expansion is the Polynesian expansion of peoples speaking Austronesian languages. The origin of the Austronesian language family is believed to be in Taiwan just off the southeastern coast of China before 3000 BC. It spread in stages from Southeast Asia and throughout the scattered islands of the Pacific Ocean. As Jared Diamond writes in Collapse, “The prehistoric Polynesian expansion was the most dramatic burst of overwater exploration in human prehistory….By around A.D. 1200, Polynesians had reached every habitable scrap of land in the vast watery triangle of ocean whose apexes are Hawaii, New Zealand, and Easter Island….both the discoveries and the settlements were meticulously planned.”

This exploration was challenging and must have required a certain minimum IQ to develop canoes capable of surviving such long sea voyages. Native Australians lived close to the Pacific Ocean for tens of thousand of years, but as far as we currently know they had never undertaken anything similar to these Polynesian voyages, not even to nearby New Zealand.

In an extreme case of the experimental method where he put his own life on the line to prove the viability of his theories, the Norwegian explorer and author Thor Heyerdahl (1914-2002) with his Kon-Tiki balsa raft in a 1947 expedition crossed much of the Pacific Ocean from South America to the Polynesian islands. He believed that these islands had been settled from South America. However, linguistic as well as genetic evidence strongly indicates that the peoples inhabiting the Pacific islands are of Southeast Asian origin. What Heyerdahl did prove with this and later voyages was that transoceanic contacts between distant cultures was possible at least in theory with what we would today consider relatively simple watercraft.

The most impressive aspect of the Viking expansion is how Scandinavians managed to create some of the fastest ships in the world only a few generations after they had first become familiar with the concept of sails. This extremely quick innovative response is not unprecedented. As Diamond mentions, firearms reached Japan in 1543 when two Portuguese adventurers armed with harquebuses (primitive guns) arrived on a Chinese cargo ship. The Japanese quickly commenced indigenous gun production and by AD 1600 “owned more and better guns than any other country in the world.” This met with resistance from their numerous and powerful warrior class, the samurai, for whom swords rated as class symbols, but the response was nevertheless impressive. Was this extremely fast rate of innovation, which has been matched in Japan in more recent times in electronics, a product of the high Japanese IQ? Jared Diamond does not ask this question, but I believe it is a relevant one.

Gates of Vienna News Feed 9/21/2009

Gates of Vienna News Feed 9/21/2009Deposed president Mel Zelaya is back in Honduras, and is reportedly holed up in the Brazilian embassy. His return was accomplished with at least the passive acquiescence of the United States. As usual, see Fausta for more details on this and other Latin American news.

In other news, the Czech Republic is reportedly planning to delay its ratification of the Lisbon Treaty until after the upcoming general elections in the UK, in order to give the Tories a chance to hold their promised referendum — assuming that the Tories win the election.

Thanks to Amil Imani, C. Cantoni, CSP, Fausta, Fjordman, Insubria, JD, Lurker from Tulsa, Michael Freund, Sean O’Brian, TB, TV, Zenster, and all the other tipsters who sent these in. Headlines and articles are below the fold.
– – – – – – – –

Financial Crisis
Bernanke’s ‘Essays’
Dems Push Expanded Community Reinvestment Act; Deny Act’s Role in Mortgage Meltdown
Obama Open to Newspaper Bailout Bill
 
USA
Are Politicians Serving US, Or Are We Serving Them?
Baucus’ Cheaper Trojan Horse
Benson Goes to Supreme Court for All of Us
Dell to Buy Perot Systems for About $3.9b
Frank Gaffney: The Obama Doctrine
Governor Paterson Bucks President Obama: I’m Still Going to Run in 2010
Historic Gift to Children’s Clinic From Abu Dhabi
The Arrogance is Breathtaking
The U.S. Missile Shield: What’s All the Fuss About
 
Europe and the EU
Banks: France Approves Sharia-Compatible Bonds
Barroso Brings Dell Aid to Ireland Before EU Vote
Belgium: In Knots Over Headscarves
Belgium: ‘Taouil is an Extremist Muslim’
Czech Delay Could Mean British Referendum on Lisbon Treaty
Czech Republic ‘Planning to Delay Signing Lisbon Treaty’
Demography: Population Growth on Small Italian Islands
EU Funding ‘Orwellian’ Artificial Intelligence Plan to Monitor Public for “Abnormal Behaviour”
Gas: Mantica Gives the Go-Ahead to EU-Central Asia Corridor
Hijab Symbolises Rift Between Islamic and European Values
Hitler Admiring Child Minder to Face Court Action in Belgium
In Milan Protests Against the Burqa, Politician La Santanchè Socked in the Face by Muslim
Ireland: Why the 18-35 Year Age Group Voted No Last Time
Italy: Muslim Leader Expresses Solidarity Over Soldiers’ Deaths
Italy: Escort Probe Suspect Arrested
Majority of Norwegians Oppose EU Membership
Next Stop Britain? The Afghan Boys Groomed as Taliban Suicide Bombers Who Are Fleeing Calais’ Jungle to Head to UK
Rule Britannia? Not if the EU Gets Its Way
Spain: Number of Divorces Down by 13% in 2008
Spain: Gains From Real Estate Boom Lost in a Year and a Half
The Quran on My Mind
UK: Labour’s EU Cheerleader Blasts the Lisbon Treaty
UK: Machetes by the Door, Drugs on the Table — And Mothers Paid by the State to Have Babies With Men They Barely Know. What Have We Done to the British Family?by Harriet Sergeant
UK: Mandelson, Blair and a Sordid Little Ploy to Deny British Voters a Choice on the European Superstate
UK: Nanny State Snatches Kids for Being Too Fat
UK: The Debate About Our Membership of the EU Has Always Been About Sovereignty
 
Mediterranean Union
EU: EP: Panzeri (PD), Maghreb One of Our Priorities
EU: Strengthen Women’s Roles With Tangible Plan of Action
Morocco: 1 of 4 Km of New Roads Financed by EU Funds
 
North Africa
Algeria: Instructions for Circumcisions
Egypt: Sorour: Commitment Against Organised Crime Needed
Energy: Gas: In 2014, Algeria Will Export 85 Bln M3
Finmeccanica: Stampa, 100 Helicopter Contract With Algeria
Internet: Study Shows Algerians Getting to Love the Web
Libya: Commission, Algerian Prisoners Were Tortured
TLC: Egyptian Mobile Phone Subrscribers Top 50 Millions
 
Israel and the Palestinians
Netanyahu Pardons Terrorists Who Killed Israelis
PNA: USA Agrees on State by 2011
 
Middle East
Compassion: The Islamic Republic Style
Emirates: 70% Rise in Companies Violating Labour Laws
Italy-Lebanon: New University Cooperation Programme
Kuwait: Woman Guilty of Mass Murder Will Sue Minister
Post Report Sparks Congressional Anger at Saudis Over Israel Boycott
Turkey: Journalist Sentenced for Insulting President
‘We May Have to Attack Iran by Dec.’
 
Russia
Defense: Moscow Asks Ankara to Buy Russian Missiles
 
South Asia
Afghanistan: New Zealand Sends Special Forces to Boost Force
Islamists in Pakistan Recruit Entire Families From Europe
Italy: Leaders Divided Over Afghan Troop Numbers on Day of Mourning
Wounded Soldier Filmed Bomb Attack
 
Sub-Saharan Africa
Scores Die in South Sudan Attack
 
Latin America
Zelaya Back in Honduras
 
Immigration
Australia: Boatload Stretches Border Protection
Frontex ‘Involved’ In Return of Migrants
Obama’s Public Health Option and Amnesty
 
General
Andrew Bostom: Apostasy and the Islamic Nations
Carolyn Glick: Our Iredeemable International System

Financial Crisis


Bernanke’s ‘Essays’

One of the benefits of having an intellectual at the helm of the Federal Reserve during this ongoing economic crisis is that intellectuals tend to leave a paper trail. Bernanke, famous for being a student of the Great Depression, is without question very well-informed on the relevant historical issues. His book reveals an intelligent and scholarly mind that does not shirk from the details but, rather, leaps without hesitation into statistical analysis of the most technical economic minutiae. The book simply wallows in charts, equations and log changes; the net result is impressive, especially when compared with his predecessor’s lightweight, revisionist chronicle, “The Age of Turbulence.”

On the one hand, it is reassuring to know that there is a genuinely intelligent man in full possession of the significant historical information at the helm of the monetary authority right now. On the other, Bernanke’s “Essays” serves as a reminder that even the most brilliant man’s abilities are limited by the conceptual models he is using to understand the situation as well as by the data available for plugging into those models. For example, on several occasions Bernanke resorts to utilizing proxies, and in one case, a proxy for a proxy, when the data required by the model cannot be found. While this is perfectly understandable, it necessarily raises questions about the reliability of his conclusions even if one assumes that his model is flawless. The Misean calculation problem does not only apply to socialists.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



Dems Push Expanded Community Reinvestment Act; Deny Act’s Role in Mortgage Meltdown

GOP cites ACORN connection

A number of experts believe that aggressive enforcement of the 1970s-era Community Reinvestment Act contributed to the mortgage meltdown, and thus to the greater financial crisis, by requiring financial institutions to lend to unqualified borrowers. Now, the Democratic majority in the House of Representatives is responding to that situation by proposing to expand the scope and power of the Community Reinvestment Act.

[Return to headlines]



Obama Open to Newspaper Bailout Bill

The president said he is “happy to look at” bills before Congress that would give struggling news organizations tax breaks if they were to restructure as nonprofit businesses.

“I haven’t seen detailed proposals yet, but I’ll be happy to look at them,” Obama told the editors of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and Toledo Blade in an interview.

Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.) has introduced S. 673, the so-called “Newspaper Revitalization Act,” that would give outlets tax deals if they were to restructure as 501(c)(3) corporations. That bill has so far attracted one cosponsor, Cardin’s Maryland colleague Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D).

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs had played down the possibility of government assistance for news organizations, which have been hit by an economic downturn and dwindling ad revenue.

[Comments from JD: “economic downturn”…hmmmm… no mention of the incredible bias of the newspapers that is turning off its readers…]

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]

USA


Are Politicians Serving US, Or Are We Serving Them?

There’s a lot of talk about “service” these days from the government, but where public service traditionally meant the government serving the people, today it seems to mean the public serving the government. Serve.gov, rolled out by the Obama administration as part of the “United We Serve” initiative, has as its mission directing everyone into public service, either as an ad hoc community organizer or as a volunteer “on a path to sustained service”. The goal being to get the public to do all the things that even Obama’s out of control spending budget can’t afford to pay anyone to do.

Behind all the cheerful sloganeering though, hides a fundamental shift from a definition of public service that requires politicians to serve the public, to one that requires the public to serve the politicians? The shift can best be summed up as, who is serving whom? With congress giving itself pay raises and Obama using Air Force One for a date in New York all at public expense, while the rest of the country suffers from unemployment and has to squeeze every penny to make ends meet—it’s not too hard to figure out just who is serving whom.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



Baucus’ Cheaper Trojan Horse

A cheaper Trojan horse is the “health-care deform” bill unveiled last Wednesday by Sen. Max Baucus. It makes the same promises that are made by the president and H.R. 3200, but with different body parts.

Before I explain why this is the case, I want to remind the liberals again that there is a Republican alternative (H.R. 3400) which will achieve everything the Democrats’ plan (H.R. 3200) will not, namely, to rein in costs, cover everybody and improve the health-care system.

But with the help of the mainstream media, the Democrats have ignored the Republican alternative because “they won” last November as they remind us, which is why H.R. 3400 has been sent to eight committees and will remain there, until Speaker Pelosi gives the order to release it. I will not hold my breath.

Democrat-care (H.R. 3200) will not deliver what the Democrats claim, even with a moving price tag of between $856 billion to $1.5 trillion. And the latest Senate panel version released by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., falls equally short.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



Benson Goes to Supreme Court for All of Us

“In this historic 16th Amendment litigation, the Government has sued Bill Benson seeking an injunction prohibiting him from falsely telling people the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was not ratified and therefore people are not required to file an income tax return. The Government contends it is entitled to an injunction because Benson is promoting an abusive tax shelter, conduct made subject to a penalty per 26 U.S.C. Section 6700.”

This case isn’t about tax evasion or “paying your fair share.” Benson has never promoted any form of abusive tax shelters. It is about the First Amendment. It is about oppressive government deciding they can change the language of the First Amendment to suit their own totalitarian needs. It is about real men who have sacrificed their freedom (Bill Benson), good times and forget getting paid big legal fees (Becraft and Dickstein) the whole way to stand and fight for what is right. Now, we must fight with them with our support.

[Return to headlines]



Dell to Buy Perot Systems for About $3.9b

Dell Inc. said Monday it has agreed to buy Plano-based information technology services company Perot Systems Corp. for about $3.9 billion as it looks to expand beyond the personal computer business.

           — Hat tip: Lurker from Tulsa [Return to headlines]



Frank Gaffney: The Obama Doctrine

Undermine our allies. Embolden our enemies. Diminish our country. Those nine words define the Obama Doctrine with respect to American security policy. All three elements were much in evidence in the President’s benighted decision last week to cancel the “Third Site” for intercontinental-range missile defenses in Eastern Europe. They will be on display as well during this week’s several conclaves with foreign leaders.

The cumulative effect is predictable: A world in which the United States has fewer friends, more enemies and less options for assuring its security…

           — Hat tip: CSP [Return to headlines]



Governor Paterson Bucks President Obama: I’m Still Going to Run in 2010

Gov. Paterson pushed back yesterday against President Obama’s stunning attempt to shove him from New York’s political stage, insisting he won’t abandon his run for governor.

[…]

Team Obama fears that Paterson is so vulnerable that if former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, a Republican, runs, he would make mincemeat of him in a head-to-head fight — and, worse for the President, drag down other Democrats and threaten his agenda in Washington.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



Historic Gift to Children’s Clinic From Abu Dhabi

(ANSAmed) — WASHINGTON, SEPTEMBER 17 — The Abu Dhabi government is to donate 150 million dollars to the Children’s National Medical Centre in Washington, the main children’s hospital in the USA. This is one of the largest sums ever given to a paediatric centre. In the words of the hospital’s director, Edwin K. Zechman: “it’s an extraordinary gift”. As Zechman told the Washington Post, “The donation will not just allow us to transform the hospital completely, but to revolutionise the entire paediatric surgery section”. The multi-million cheque will be signed by the government of Abu Dhabi, on of the seven United Arab Emirates. The benefactor behind the project is Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the sheik who came to an agreement with the US philanthropist Joseph E. Robert, who came up with the idea for the initiative. Robert, who is fighting a brain tumour — similar to the one that killed Senator Ted Kennedy, persuaded the sheik to gift the huge amount in order to ensure that “children’s surgery can make an early start on its journey into the future”. The 150 million dollars will, in fact, help promote new research projects, to try out advance technologies, to work on new therapies and reduce the amount of pain felt by infants undergoing surgery to a minimum.(ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



The Arrogance is Breathtaking

What is it about this administration and the mainstream media that grates on people’s nerves? Why are folks so angry that they’re holding heated town hall meetings, rallies and tea parties from coast to coast? Why do we object so strongly to current policies that we’re willing to travel great distances at our own expense to protest, only to be called loathsome names?

Is it that the government is trying to shove health-care reform down our throats despite the fact that 83 percent of Americans are satisfied with what they have? Is it the cap-and-trade farce that will skyrocket prices on every conceivable good and service for no discernible benefit? Is it Obama’s goal to spread our hard-earned wealth to those who haven’t earned it?

It’s all of those things, of course, and more. But the objections of many Americans can be summed up in one single word: ARROGANCE.

Have you noticed the arrogance of this administration and its media? If you combine a liberal president with a liberal Congress, reported by a liberal press … the result is a degree of egotism and superiority toward the citizens of this country seldom equaled in any presidential term.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



The U.S. Missile Shield: What’s All the Fuss About

Warsaw,Poland: President Barack Obama announced his decision to scrap U.S. missile defense plans for Poland (10 interceptors) and the Czech Republic (X-band Radar) on September 17 at night. There couldn’t have been a worse timing and a more surprising way to communicate that. September 17 was a painful 70th anniversary of the 1939 Soviet invasion of Poland, synchronized with Hitler’s conquest of that country, which began the most devastating Word War II on September 1, 1939.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]

Europe and the EU


Banks: France Approves Sharia-Compatible Bonds

(ANSAmed) — PARIS — As of today French banks are allowed to issue ‘sukuks’, or sharia-compatible bonds, in other words bonds that comply with the rules of Islamic law, which prohibit interest on loans. The French parliament took the decision by approving a bill that aims to allow national banks to issue financial instruments that are complaint with the Islamic law. The measure, which was adopted two days ahead of the end of Ramadan, adds new strength to Islamic finance which, contrary to what may be imagined, enjoys its peak during Ramadan, when people are focused on abstinence and meditation. This circumstance was certified by a research paper carried out by three university professors, Jedrzej Bialkowski, Ahmad Etebarri and Thomas Wisniewski, which was printed by French daily paper Les Echos. The report illustrates the unexpected effects that Ramadan has on the performance of stock markets in Muslim Countries. The research paper states that “Insofar as a spiritual experience shared by all Muslims, Ramadan encourages a certain dose of optimism which in turn influences investor decisions”. Between 1989 and 2007, during Ramadan, the stock markets of the 14 surveyed countries, which include the Arab Emirates, Jordan, Pakistan and Egypt, registered a performance that was twice the yearly average. Only Tunisia and Morocco did not swing far from the average. The French parliament’s decision to allow sukuks is not the first taken to support the development of Islamic finance in France as well. Last February the ministry of Finance published a first circular letter indicating the tax regime that must be applied to certain instruments of sharia-compatible finance. One of these is given by ‘murabaha’, a contract on the basis of which a bank acquires an asset in the name of its client, undertaking to transfer property of the same to the mentioned client against the payment of a commission.(ANSAmed)

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Barroso Brings Dell Aid to Ireland Before EU Vote

The European Commission offered 14.8 million euros to help workers at Dell’s Irish plant find new jobs on Saturday (19 September), just weeks before the Irish vote on the Lisbon Treaty.

Commission President José Manuel Barroso unveiled the aid in an official trip to the western city of Limerick, which is still reeling from the loss of about 2,000 jobs at the world’s No. 1 chipmaker.

“I am very glad that the Commission can demonstrate concretely the Union’s solidarity with Limerick […] in this manner,” Barroso said in a city that has become one of the biggest casualties of the Celtic Tiger’s demise.

Ireland has to ratify the Lisbon Treaty, which is designed to give Brussels a stronger role in world affairs, in order for it to take effect across the 27-member bloc.

Irish voters, accounting for less than 1% of the EU’s near half a billion population, rejected the charter in a referendum last year and a second ‘no’ would likely plunge the Union into a crisis.

The importance of Europe for the battered Irish economy is the central theme of the government’s campaign to ratify the EU’s reform treaty on 2 October and Barroso reinforced that argument.

“The European Central Bank has lent more than 120 billion euros to the Irish banking system, 15% of total ECB lending,” Barroso told an audience of councillors and local representatives from Limerick.

“Being in the euro area has provided a vital anchor of stability for Ireland at this difficult time.”

Opinion polls suggest Ireland will approve the treaty, which is intended to speed up decision-making in the enlarged bloc, but a significant proportion of the electorate is undecided and officials are worried the government’s deep unpopularity will generate a large protest vote.

After rejection last year, Dublin is hoping concessions from Brussels, including the right to retain an Irish commissioner, and the need for EU support in the recession, will help secure ratification this time around.

Barroso warned in Limerick that Ireland could lose its right to nominate an EU commissioner if it rejects the Lisbon Treaty for a second time and a ‘no’ vote would create uncertainty about Ireland’s place in Europe, further damaging its economy.

The grant from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) will help 2,400 redundant workers in the computer industry find new jobs, Barroso said.

In an interview with Reuters on Friday, Foreign Minister Micheal Martin said the vote was too early to call.

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]



Belgium: In Knots Over Headscarves

Antwerp’s cautionary tale about the complexities of educating Europe’s Muslim children

FOR all its grand central squares and lively cultural scene, the Belgian port of Antwerp is not always a happy town. Flemish old-timers share its gritty streets with Arabs, Africans, Asians and, in the diamond district, Hasidic Jews. Race relations are not easy: in the latest local elections, a third of the vote went to Vlaams Belang, an anti-immigrant, far-right Flemish nationalist party. The handsome stone bulk of the Royal Atheneum, a once-elite state school with a 200-year history, has produced legendary free-thinkers and radicals in its day. Now, however, it is enjoying unhappy fame: as the centre of an experiment in multiculturalism wrecked by intolerance. The story defies neat conclusions.

In September 2001 Karin Heremans became headmistress of the Atheneum, which has students of 45 nationalities. The September 11th attacks on America came ten days after she took charge, and her schoolyard became the scene of “very intense” arguments. Ms Heremans responded by working hard to turn her school into a place of “active pluralism”. A project about Darwin was led by science teachers but backed by a dialogue among the school’s religious instructors. A local composer wrote a work with Christian, Jewish and Muslim passages for pupils to sing. There were debates on sexuality and elections. A fashion show saw girls invited to wear Muslim headscarves, or not: one teenager wore half a scarf to symbolise indecision.

In France Muslim headscarves, along with all ostentatious religious symbols, have been banned at state schools since 2004. It helps that France has a record of separating religion from the state going back more than a century (even a Christmas nativity play would be unthinkable at a French state school).

By contrast Belgium has muddled through. Most schools in Flanders are state-funded but church-run (and pretty secular in outlook). All schools have been left to craft their own rules on headscarves and, in recent years, Antwerp’s schools began banning religious clothing, leaving just three that allow scarves—among them the Atheneum. Ms Heremans soon noticed Muslim girls moving to her college. Between 2006 and 2008 the proportion of Muslim pupils at the Atheneum rose from half to 80%.

“At the beginning, I didn’t see a problem,” she explains. But then, a number of “very conservative” families moved their daughters to the school. By 2007 about 15 girls came to school wearing all-concealing robes and gloves, with only their faces showing. Ms Heremans confronted them. “I said: ‘You’re stigmatising yourselves. You’re breaking with society by wearing those clothes.’“ The girls replied that she was stigmatising them. Pupils began donning longer scarves. Others started covering up at school, even though teachers saw the same girls walking in the streets unveiled. When questioned, such girls said they felt uncomfortable at school without head coverings. In 2007 it proved impossible to organise a two-day school trip to Paris—a longstanding annual treat for 15-year-old pupils. “Suddenly it was a problem for girls to stay overnight. Their older brothers had to come too,” Ms Heremans says. Most of all, an oppressive, “heavy” atmosphere hung over the schoolyard.

On September 1st Ms Heremans reluctantly reversed herself and banned headscarves at her school. This triggered some nasty protests, including threats from a small clutch of hardliners. The results have been serious: about 100 of the school’s 580 pupils have left. Local politicians have raised fears that some may not get an education at all. On September 11th the Flemish education board banned religious symbols in all 700 secular state schools under its control, including the Atheneum. (Religious schools remain free to set dress codes.) It was the opposite of what Ms Heremans once sought, she admits. “But now I feel supported.” Some older girls quietly thanked her, saying: “You’ve no idea of the pressure we were under.”

Yet it is not just fiery conservatives who have condemned Ms Heremans. “Boss of my own head”, or BOEH in the Dutch acronym, is a feminist group with a mixed Muslim and non-Muslim membership. Its members protested outside the school with whimsy, turning up with sieves and toys on their heads. A spokesman for BOEH, Samira Azabar, says that schools are making it harder for Muslim girls to be “emancipated” through education. She is probably right. Other Antwerp schools banned scarves on the ground of equality but in reality, says Ms Azabar, they wanted to repel pupils from poor backgrounds who might pull them down academic league tables. Ms Azabar dislikes the idea of all-Muslim schools, thinking them bad for integration in the community. But barring scarves “doesn’t help girls”; in her view, Ms Heremans has “given up the battle”.

The paradox of liberalism

In short, the story of the Atheneum is complicated. Unintended consequences abound. There are people of goodwill on both sides, and actors with murkier motives. The row will probably lead to the establishment of Muslim state schools in Antwerp: the city already has Catholic and Jewish schools. Patrick Janssens, the city’s mayor, regrets this, saying he is “not particularly in favour” of single-faith schools. He puts his trust in long-term development: as more Muslims go to university, or feel that society offers them equal opportunities, they will be “liberated” and “realise that religion is not dominant over all other values.”

The story of the Antwerp Atheneum is the latest example of a paradox: how should liberal, tolerant Europeans protect their values, even as they protect the rights of less liberal minorities in their midst? Blanket laws banning headscarves are hardly a liberal solution. But Belgium’s piecemeal approach left Karin Heremans running something approaching a ghetto-school. Distrust anyone with a simple answer.

           — Hat tip: TV [Return to headlines]



Belgium: ‘Taouil is an Extremist Muslim’

Taouil appeared in the news in two contexts recently. One was a report on Islamic extremism in Antwerp that Filip Dewinter published on his site — Taouil announced he will sue Dewinter for accusing him of encouraging Belgian youth to go on Jihad.

The second is the headscarf debate. After two Antwerp school announced they will ban the headscarf, the last schools in Antwerp to do so, Taouil called on Muslims to boycott Flemish schools. He later backed down, but more recently, when the Flemish public school authority decided to ban headscarves across all public schools, he again warned that Muslims ..would set up their own schools.

—————

Imam Nordine Taouil is a extremist Muslims, Alain Winants, administrator-general of the Belgian State Security Service said on Belgian TV (Terzake) yesterday.

Winants said that on the basis of the information they have about Mr. Nordine Taouil, they think he’s an extremist Muslim of the Salafist-Wahhabist movement, who is militantly active in the Salafist circles. Taouil supposedly organized training for young Belgian Muslims in radical Koran schools in Pakistan.

Salafism is an uncompromising version of Islam. “It is actually a movement that wants to go back to the original Islam and which rejects all Western influences on Islam,” according to Winants.

Taouil set himself up as the spokesperson for the Muslim community in Belgian and in recent months made very sharp statements on the headscarf debate. He’s also chairman of the Muslim council, which represents all movements within the Muslim community. But not all Muslims agree with him. His supporters are a small ultra-conservative minority.

           — Hat tip: TV [Return to headlines]



Czech Delay Could Mean British Referendum on Lisbon Treaty

David Cameron might be able to hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty because the Czech Republic will probably delay its ratification of the agreement until after a general election in Britain, European Union leaders have been told.

c the Czech prime minister, has privately warned other EU leaders that a legal challenge could impose a “long delay” on his country’s ratification, perhaps until after the British election, widely expected next May.

Mr Cameron has pledged to put the Lisbon Treaty, formerly the European Union’s constitution, to a popular vote in Britain as long as it has not been ratified by all 27 member states. If every country has given its approval and the Treaty has officially come into force, Mr Cameron’s options would be extremely limited.

Opinion polls suggest that Irish voters will endorse the agreement in a referendum next month, while Germany and Poland are close to completing their own ratifications, leaving the Czech Republic as the only laggard.

The delay in Prague might create an opening for Mr Cameron — assuming he wins a British election — to hold a referendum in his first weeks in office.

Sources told The Daily Telegraph that EU leaders learned of the development during private — and ill-tempered — talks in Brussels last Thursday. Senior diplomats said that President Nicolas Sarkozy of France erupted with “fury” after Mr Fischer raised the prospect of a long delay.

“Sarkozy exploded and described the Czech position as scandalous and unacceptable,” said an EU diplomat. “He warned the Czechs to get it ‘sorted out’ quickly if Ireland votes ‘Yes’, as the Irish Prime Minister had just told them is likely.”

Mr Sarkozy then threatened the Czech leader with unspecified “consequences” if Prague allowed the delay to trigger a British referendum that would probably lead to the Lisbon Treaty’s rejection.

“There is no question that we will accept to stay in a no-man’s land with a Europe that does not have the institutions to cope with the crisis,” the French president is believed to have said.

The Conservatives want to keep the Treaty unratified until after the British election — and they have privately urged the Czechs to drag their feet. “We’ve made ourselves quite clear. The Czechs know where we stand on this and what we hope for,” said a Tory source.

If, however, Mr Cameron wins power and the Lisbon Treaty has come into force, he has not spelt out what would follow, saying only that he would “not let matters rest there”. Privately, Mr Cameron’s aides are worried that he would then come under pressure from eurosceptic Tories to hold a referendum even on a ratified treaty.

This would effectively become a vote on whether Britain should stay in the EU — and Mr Cameron would be highly reluctant to allow such a referendum. William Hague, the shadow foreign secretary, has privately called this issue a “ticking time bomb” under Mr Cameron’s leadership.

[Return to headlines]



Czech Republic ‘Planning to Delay Signing Lisbon Treaty’

EU leaders are said to be furious that the Czech Republic is planning to delay signing the Lisbon treaty for up to six months even if the Irish vote “yes” in their referendum next month.

The country might even try to delay it until after the British general election campaign when a Tory victory would see the question put to voters by David Cameron.

Nicolas Sarkozy, who helped to draw up the treaty after the French and Dutch voted against its predecessor, the EU Constitution, has warned Prague that it faces “consequences” if it does not swiftly follow an Irish “yes” with its own ratification.

The outburst followed a private warning from Jan Fischer, the Czech caretaker Prime Minister, to his EU counterparts over dinner at their summit in Brussels last Thursday, it has emerged.

Mr Fischer said that Václav Klaus, the country’s unpredictable President, was planning to have a group of loyal senators in the Czech Upper House refer the treaty back to the country’s constitutional court for a second time, which could delay ratification for between three and six months.

This would mean that the treaty could still be unratified going into the British general election campaign, expected next April or May. Mr Cameron has pledged that, if the document remained a live issue, even though Britain has completed its own ratification, he would call a referendum on it. This prospect horrifies most EU leaders, given the strong vein of euroscepticism in Britain.

Tensions are already running high among EU leaders over whether the Irish will vote in favour of the treaty on October 2 after a close-run referendum campaign. They are desperate that the momentum of a “yes” is not lost on the eurosceptic Czech and Polish presidents, the final two signatures required for EU ratification.

The treaty further erodes national powers to veto EU decisions, and a Tory government would campaign against it. President Klaus is understood to have told allies that he wants to wait if possible to see if Mr Cameron wins the next election.

Speaking after last Thursday’s dinner, Mr Sarkozy said: “I stated clearly that if the Irish say ‘yes’, there is no question that we will accept to stay in a no-man’s land with a Europe that does not have the institutions to cope with the crisis,” he said.

Asked about what could be done to persuade President Klaus to sign, he added: “It will be necessary to draw the consequences — but those will be the subject of another meeting.”

Mr Fischer is acting as caretaker Prime Minister after the Government of Mirek Topolánek fell in the summer and while fresh elections are organised. He has warned privately that he has little control over the country’s headstrong President. Speaking to Czech journalists after last week’s summit, he admitted: “It is certainly a fact that several government leaders perceive the ratification process in the Czech Republic with a degree of nervousness.”

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]



Demography: Population Growth on Small Italian Islands

(ANSAmed) — PORTOFERRAIO (LIVORNO), SEPTEMBER 14 — On small islands, population is growing at a constant rate, average educational level has been slowly rising over the past few years and the young are having great difficulty finding a steady job, according to Teresa Savino, researcher at the Tuscany Regional Institute for Economic Planning (IPERT), speaking during the second day of Insulae, a European conference on the smaller Italian islands held in Portoferraio. “Almost forty years ago in 1971, 178,000 people were living on small Italian islands, whereas today there are 214,000,” said the scholar. “Population levels have grown and often more than the average of individual regions. Many have moved. However, its is a population which is older than average, with double the number of elderly inhabitants, more adults and fewer young people and children. Demographic aging, a trend common to all Italy, seems more acute on small islands.” As concerns employment, Savino said that “on islands employment seems more flexible than in other territories, with a fair share of opportunities but very little stable employment.” She added that the fact that a large part of this employment is linked to tourism also means a lower number of high school and university graduates than the regional average.” (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



EU Funding ‘Orwellian’ Artificial Intelligence Plan to Monitor Public for “Abnormal Behaviour”

The European Union is spending millions of pounds developing “Orwellian” technologies designed to scour the internet and CCTV images for “abnormal behaviour”.

A five-year research programme, called Project Indect, aims to develop computer programmes which act as “agents” to monitor and process information from web sites, discussion forums, file servers, peer-to-peer networks and even individual computers.

Its main objectives include the “automatic detection of threats and abnormal behaviour or violence”.

Project Indect, which received nearly £10 million in funding from the European Union, involves the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) and computer scientists at York University, in addition to colleagues in nine other European countries.

Shami Chakrabarti, the director of human rights group Liberty, described the introduction of such mass surveillance techniques as a “sinister step” for any country, adding that it was “positively chilling” on a European scale.

The Indect research, which began this year, comes as the EU is pressing ahead with an expansion of its role in fighting crime, terrorism and managing migration, increasing its budget in these areas by 13.5% to nearly £900 million.

The European Commission is calling for a “common culture” of law enforcement to be developed across the EU and for a third of police officers — more than 50,000 in the UK alone — to be given training in European affairs within the next five years.

According to the Open Europe think tank, the increased emphasis on co-operation and sharing intelligence means that European police forces are likely to gain access to sensitive information held by UK police, including the British DNA database. It also expects the number of UK citizens extradited under the controversial European Arrest Warrant to triple.

Stephen Booth, an Open Europe analyst who has helped compile a dossier on the European justice agenda, said these developments and projects such as Indect sounded “Orwellian” and raised serious questions about individual liberty.

“This is all pretty scary stuff in my book. These projects would involve a huge invasion of privacy and citizens need to ask themselves whether the EU should be spending their taxes on them,” he said.

“The EU lacks sufficient checks and balances and there is no evidence that anyone has ever asked ‘is this actually in the best interests of our citizens?’“

Miss Chakrabarti said: “Profiling whole populations instead of monitoring individual suspects is a sinister step in any society.

“It’s dangerous enough at national level, but on a Europe-wide scale the idea becomes positively chilling.”

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]



Gas: Mantica Gives the Go-Ahead to EU-Central Asia Corridor

(ANSAmed) — BRUSSELS, SEPTEMBER 15 — Italy’s hope to create the “Southern Corridor’, of which the gas pipeline project ITGI (connecting Greece and Turkey) will be a part, were stressed once again by the Foreign undersecretary Alfredo Mantica, who took part in the Ministerial Conference between European Union and Central Asian Countries, in Brussels. “Our country shares the fundamental EU objective, which is made of stable and effective relationships with the Central Asian area, also identifying new transport means for oil and gas,” Mantica said. In the environmental and water sectors, Mantica recalled the coordinating role carried out by Italy with the European Commission, as part of the strategy on Central Asia adopted by the European Council in June 2007. In this environment, on November 5 and 6, 2009, the third High Level meeting on environment and water will take place in Rome, in the Italian Foreign Ministry offices, with the aim to re-launch and expand the cooperation between the EU and Central Asia in this delicate sector. The aim is to promote a “regionalization” of relationships between EU and Central Asia, by identifying concrete cooperation themes starting with the preservation of water basins, tackling climate changes and environmental integration.(ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Hijab Symbolises Rift Between Islamic and European Values

EUROPEAN DIARY: A decision by Flemish schools to ban Muslim headscarves has divided communities in Belgium, writes JAMIE SMYTH

COMMUNITY TENSIONS are running high in Belgium following a decision by the Flemish public school board to ban pupils wearing Muslim headscarves.

“This decision promotes the feeling of equality and prevents group formation or segregation on the basis of external symbols of life philosophy,” said the school board, which runs 700 schools in the Flemish-speaking region of Brussels, in a statement published last Friday.

The ruling follows weeks of angry protests by Muslims outside two schools in Antwerp and the neighbouring town of Hoboken, which introduced their own bans on the traditional Islamic headscarf, known as hijab. The schools argue that Muslims were being pressured to wear headscarves by families and peers, which encourages the radicalisation of pupils.

“There is a problem when there is pressure on one group because we want to live together in reciprocity and it’s very important for us,” said Karin Heremans, principal of the Royal Athenaeum school in Antwerp, which has banned all religious symbols such as the hijab.

“Everyone has to feel good in this school, so a social minority here become majority. So it was a problem.”

Her decision enraged sections of the Muslim community and provoked weeks of protests outside the school with people holding placards saying “No headscarves, no pupils” and “Everybody free except us”.

Heremans has received death threats, the school on Hoboken was vandalised and several Muslim campaigners were arrested last week outside one of the schools.

Muslim students at the schools now find themselves in the middle of a bitter debate that threatens to undermine integration efforts in the community. “I find going to school important, but also wearing the scarf is very important,” one pupil told VTM television as she left school without wearing a hijab.

In Belgium, schools have typically allowed individuals to take their own decision on whether to ban the wearing of Muslim headscarves.

About a third of schools have implemented a ban, another third allow the hijab while the remaining schools have not issued any guidance to parents on the issue.

Giving local schools’ autonomy over the contentious issue of the hijab allows principals to consult with the local community and has been credited with reducing tension in many areas.

However the Flemish public school board says it was forced to introduce the ban because of a court challenge lodged by one of the Muslim pupils at a school introducing the headscarf ban.

The Belgian Council of State is expected to issue a ruling today that follows advice already issued by its advocate general that stated: “Such a ban is not lawful and that only the umbrella organisation of state schools can decide on whether or not to introduce such as measure.”

The Council of State’s ruling is likely to force school boards in Wallonia, the French-speaking region in Belgium, to reconsider their own advice to schools on the issue. A blanket ban on all religious symbols, including crucifixes, will prove difficult to implement due to the large number of Catholic schools in the country.

Antwerp imam Nordine Taouil has predicted many Muslims will withdraw their children from the community schools.

“We are getting the signal of ‘you are not welcome’. This forces us to establish our own schools,” Taouil said. Campaign groups are also considering a new legal challenge against the school board’s ban on the hijab.

“For us, this decision is a downright disaster,” Kitty Roggeman, spokeswoman for the “Boss of our own heads” group, told the Belgian media following the board’s decision last Friday.

The far-right Flemish party Vlaams Belang and the right-wing List Dedecker party both welcomed the ban. However local Green MP Meyrem Almaci said local consultations should have taken place before the ban was announced.

The tensions in Belgium arise as controversy continues in many European countries about the best way to integrate Muslims into mainstream society.

France, which introduced a ban on religious symbols such as hijab from schools in 2004, has recently set up a parliamentary commission to consider a ban on the burqa, the full body Muslim dress for women that typically includes a face veil.

French president Nicolas Sarkozy said recently the burqa was “a sign of subservience” and had no place in French society.

Denmark is currently grappling with a proposal to ban judges from wearing headscarves and in Switzerland a female Muslim basketball player has been banned from wearing a scarf while playing league games.

Other EU countries have taken a more tolerant approach. For example last year the Government decided last year not to issue a directive to schools on wearing Islamic headscarves.

But with 16 million Muslims now living in the EU, friction between Islamic traditions and European values, as seen in Flanders this week, are sure to bubble up periodically across the Union.

           — Hat tip: TV [Return to headlines]



Hitler Admiring Child Minder to Face Court Action in Belgium

The woman has a portrait of Hitler, Nazi literature and a banner of a banned Flemish neo-Nazi group in the reception area of her home

The Flanders regional minister reponsible for youth affairs, Jo Vandeurzen, said that despite the right to freedom of expression, the woman’s remarks to television “were unacceptable and intolerable.”

BRUSSELS (AFP-EJP)—-A Belgian child minder who openly admires Adolf Hitler is set to be taken to court and is likely to lose her business permit, Belgian media reported Wednesday.

The woman, who claims to be married to a “former Nazi”, has a portrait of Hitler, plenty of Nazi literature and a banner of a banned Flemish neo-Nazi group VMO in the reception area of her home in the port city of Antwerp, where she minds local children.

Speaking to VRT television, she compared the presence of Turks and Moroccans in Flanders to that of the Jews in Germany during the 1930s and ‘40s.

She described Hitler as a “great visionary, a man with fantastic ideas,” according to the daily newspaper La Libre Belgique.

The woman and her husband were reported to be so extreme that they were

banned by Flemish extreme-right party Vlaams Belang.

The Flanders regional minister reponsible for youth affairs, Jo Vandeurzen, said that despite the right to freedom of expression, the woman’s remarks to VRT “were unacceptable and intolerable.”

The body reponsible for licensing day care centres, Kind en Gezin (Child and Family), has begun moves to take her permit away, while the regional centre for equal opportunity has begun to take legal action.

Michael Freilich, editor of local Jewish magazine Joods Actueel called on the authorities to prosecute the woman and her husband under the law against negationism.

           — Hat tip: TV [Return to headlines]



In Milan Protests Against the Burqa, Politician La Santanchè Socked in the Face by Muslim

MILAN: Italian female politician protesting burquas punched by muslim in scuffle. (hat tip Adam)

Santanche is currently running a campaign in Italy to expose the burqua and veil as oppressive to women. She took the fight to the front line today, entering a muslim ‘prayer meeting’ and asking to speak to some women to tell them they were being oppressed by a male-dominated regime masquerading as a religion, and was subsequently attacked.

Google translation here…

           — Hat tip: C. Cantoni [Return to headlines]



Ireland: Why the 18-35 Year Age Group Voted No Last Time

ERASMUS GENERATION: Many under 35s said No in the last referendum. Some of those who voted against the treaty then have been asked how they will vote second time around, writes MARY FITZGERALD

THEY ARE sometimes referred to as the Erasmus generation. The moniker stems from the EU university exchange programme that has, since its founding in 1987, allowed more than 1.2 million young Europeans to study in another member state.

But the expression has a broader meaning, encompassing an entire generation that has known nothing but European integration, a generation considered to be more at ease with the notion of a common European identity. In Ireland, it means those born after the State joined the EU in 1973.

But what happened to Ireland’s Erasmus generation in last year’s referendum on the Lisbon Treaty? Aside from the usual issue of low turnout among voters aged under 35, that demographic returned an overwhelming No vote.

According to research commissioned by the Department of Foreign Affairs, 55 per cent of those aged 18-24 voted No, and 45 per cent Yes. In the 25-34 year age group, the No vote was even more pronounced: 59 per cent against, 41 per cent who voted Yes.

The fact a majority of young Irish voters rejected the Lisbon Treaty did not go unnoticed elsewhere in Europe. President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso said it was one of the aspects of the Irish No he found most worrying. When French president Nicolas Sarkozy visited Dublin to “understand” the result, he made sure that young people were among those he met.

Andrew Byrne set up Generation Yes, a civil society campaign group that targets young voters, in response to the fact so many voted No last year.

“We know from research that this age group is not anti-European, in fact it’s the most pro-European of any age group,” he says. Byrne believes young people felt “disconnected” from last year’s Yes campaign.

“They were ignored last year. The campaign didn’t speak in their language and it didn’t use their media. If there’s a deeper issue at work here, it is perhaps a disconnect between the major political parties and younger people.

“I think there is a sense that our age group is perhaps more independent-minded than previous generations, and more willing to question authority.

“That’s a big difference in mindset, and may have perhaps fed into the whole anti-Government sentiment.”

Byrne says he and fellow Generation Yes canvassers have detected a trend towards a Yes vote.

An I rish Times /TNS mrbi poll published earlier this month, however, found that those in the 18-24 age group are the most negative towards the treaty, and the only age group in which the No campaign is in the lead.

BreandÁn Macgabhann (27)

Breandán MacGabhann (27) is completing a PhD in geology at NUI Galway. He voted No last year and intends to vote No again.

“I have read the entire treaty and the consolidated version, and I think it takes the EU in the wrong direction. There are a lot of problems with the EU — particularly in terms of the lack of democracy — that I think the treaty actually makes worse. I am worried about implications for taxation. Overall, I think the guarantees don’t even come close to changing the treaty enough for me to change my mind.

“It’s not addressing the fundamental democratic deficit in the EU, and they seem to be ignoring democracy when the result doesn’t suit.”

Padraic Doorey (34)

Padraic Doorey (34), from Castledermot, Co Kildare, has just finished a Masters in law. He voted No last year and intends to vote No again next month.

“I read the treaty and I also studied the EU constitution as part of my degree. I believe this is a step towards federalism. If Lisbon is passed, it allows for the EU to later make decisions which will affect smaller countries like Ireland that will have a reduced voice. We shouldn’t be voting again. I feel it is very undemocratic. The content of the treaty itself has not changed and I don’t believe the legal guarantees will stand up . . .

“This idea we have to pass the treaty to get out of this economic mess is not something I believe at all.”

Treasa O’brien (31)

Treasa O’Brien (31) from Killarney, Co Kerry, is a film-maker. She voted No last year and intends to vote No again.

“I feel like a European and I want to stay with Europe, but I think the EU, which was originally an economic model, is becoming too much of a political and then ultimately a militarised model. It’s a step too far.

“There are no facts to back up the Government’s argument that this will be better for the recession. Some people voted No because of a sense of nationalism or because they are afraid abortion is going to come in, and that’s definitely not where I’m coming from at all.

“My argument is Yes to Europe, No to Lisbon.”

Ciara Coy (26)

Ciara Coy (26), from Loughrea, Co Galway, is studying for a Masters in community development. She voted No last year and intends to vote No again next month.

“I am not against Europe at all but I have reservations about the direction it’s going in. A lot of my friends were undecided last year. They didn’t vote, or they didn’t know what way to vote — that confusion is still there.

“I think this is about the United States of Europe, and that raises alarm bells for me. The guarantees are worthless. Nothing has changed in the treaty. We are told to vote Yes but never given reasons why that actually reference the treaty. It’s like offering a lollipop to a child without warning them that it will rot their teeth.”

Adam Douglas (19)

Adam Douglas (19), from Fermoy, Co Cork, is studying international relations at DCU. He ran for the Green Party in local elections. He voted No last year and intends to vote Yes this year.

“The big issue for me last year was to do with the commissioner, and the fact I thought more countries should have the opportunity to vote on the treaty.

“I decided recently to vote Yes this time. A lot of the arguments on the No side lost credibility for me after hearing them the second time. The commissioner question has been addressed and there is also the realisation we are in a very different economic situation. The best thing at the moment would be to get the treaty sorted so we can concentrate on the bigger issues.”

Andrew Hanrahan (32)

Andrew Hanrahan (32) is a primary school principal in Monageer, Co Wexford. He voted No last year and intends to vote Yes next month.

“Like most people I know who voted No last year, my vote didn’t really have anything to do with the treaty itself. It was mostly to show dissatisfaction with the Government. And while I am still very dissatisfied with the Government, I don’t think the country can afford to waste any more time debating Lisbon when we have more important things to sort out at the moment.

“I was struck by the fact last year we were cheered by British Eurosceptics when we voted No. I don’t see how we could be siding with a crowd like that.”

Andrew O’Brien (30)

Andrew O’Brien (30), from Co Cork, works as a physics research scientist at NUI Galway. He voted No last year and is leaning towards No again.

“I didn’t see any point in voting Yes last year. I wasn’t convinced enough. I fell into the ‘If you don’t know, vote No’ category, and most people I know also voted No for this reason. I am about 90 per cent sure I will vote No again because they have ignored the fact we voted No last time. I am not convinced by the legal guarantees and I can’t see how the Lisbon Treaty itself can improve the economic situation.

“I am not against the EU . . . I feel offended when people say voting No is a vote against Europe.”

Brian Hayden (28)

Brian Hayden (28), from Duleek, Co Meath, is completing a PhD in fish biology at UCD. He voted No last year, but plans to vote Yes.

“It was very difficult to make a decision last year due to all the disinformation and scaremongering. I thought a No vote would lead to some sort of renegotiation and a better deal for Ireland, especially on the commissioner issue.

“Because the economic situation in Ireland has changed, I think we need to ally ourselves as closely as possible with Europe. Some people might want to punish the Government by voting No, but I think we should take the treaty on its merits, and wonder what we are going to do with the Government when the next general election comes around.”

[Return to headlines]



Italy: Muslim Leader Expresses Solidarity Over Soldiers’ Deaths

Rome, 21 Sept. (AKI) — An Italian Muslim leader on Monday expressed solidarity with the country as it holds a day of mourning to commemorate the six soldiers killed in a suicide attack in Afghanistan last week. Abdellah Redouane, secretary general of the Islamic Cultural Centre of Italy and director of Rome’s Grand Mosque released details of a letter sent to president Giorgio Napolitano.

“The Muslims of Italy feel close to their Italian brothers at this tragic time,” said Abdellah Redouane.

The funeral of the soldiers were due to take place at Rome’s Saint Paul Outside the Walls Church, where Redouane was to attend, representing Rome’s Grand Mosque (photo).

Italian president Giorgio Napolitano as well as prime minister Silvio Berlusconi were expected to attend the state funeral for the soldiers.

“Muslims are feeling the pain and hope that the supreme sacrifice of six soldiers can contribute to peace in Afghanistan,” said the statement.

“In this day of national mourning, I wish to express our most profound grief on behalf of the Islamic Cultural Centre of Italy as well as the Muslim community, for the tragic loss of six Italian soldiers who were committed to a mission of peace and who were victims of their strong sense of duty, for which every Italian should feel proud of,” concluded the statement.

The suicide attack last Thursday killed six soldiers when a suicide bomber positioned his car between the two armoured vehicles in which the soldiers were travelling. One of the armoured vehicles was completely destroyed in the attack.

All those killed were from Italy’s 186th Lightning Brigade.The blast also killed 10 Afghans and injured four Italian soldiers as well as dozens of Afghan civilians.

           — Hat tip: C. Cantoni [Return to headlines]



Italy: Escort Probe Suspect Arrested

Businessman case raised scrutiny of PM’s private life

(ANSA) — Bari, September 18 — A southern Italian businessman was arrested Friday in a sex for favours case that has led to scrutiny of the private life of centre-right Premier Silvio Berlusconi. Gianpaolo Tarantini, 35, was stopped at Bari airport on drugs charges after recent interference with evidence and because police had discovered he was planning to escape, a prosecutor said.

“The arrest was made after an acceleration in our work, following major interference in evidence over the last few days” said Bari Chief Prosecutor Antonio Laudati.

The businessman, who has said he fears for his life, was under investigation for allegedly providing prostitutes and cocaine to Puglia centre-left officials to boost his healthcare business.

“The arrest was made on suspicion of peddling drugs but investigations will now focus on all Tarantini’s incriminated activities,” Laudati said. In another part of the probe, Tarantini also allegedly paid escorts to attend parties at the residences of Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi, presenting them as acquaintances.

Leaks about the premier, following a claim from Berlusconi’s estranged wife that he frequents minors after he attended an 18-year-old’s birthday party, have been given wide play in the international press.

Berlusconi, who faces no liability in the case, vigorously denies the suggestions and has sued Italian and foreign dailies.

He says he has never paid for sex in his life and was unaware that some of the women who came to his official residence in Rome and his Sardinia villa were escorts.

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Majority of Norwegians Oppose EU Membership

Euroscepticism rising in Norway despite electoral setbacks for anti-EU parties.

Opposition to membership of the European Union has increased in Norway in the past month, with most Norwegians now saying they would vote against accession.

The poll, which was carried out in the week running up to general elections on 14 September, found that 51.0% of Norwegians are opposed to joining the EU, up from 48.3% in August.

The poll, which carried out by Sentio for two national dailies, Nationen and Klassekampen, found that the percentage of Norwegians in favour of joining the EU has fallen to 35.7%, from 38.5%. Another 12% of those questioned said they do not know whether Norway should join the Union or not.

Three anti-EU parties — the Centre Party, the Socialist People’s Party and the Liberals — emerged weakened from the parliamentary elections. By contrast, the country’s leading pro-EU parties — Labour and the Conservatives — made big gains.

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]



Next Stop Britain? The Afghan Boys Groomed as Taliban Suicide Bombers Who Are Fleeing Calais’ Jungle to Head to UK

[…]

EU justice commissioner Jacques Barrot has demanded a change in European law to allow a ‘significant number’ to be fast-tracked into Britain, it was reported.

Mr Johnson said’The UK has a robust system for dealing with both asylum seekers and immigration and provides protection to those who are genuinely in need.

‘Reports that the UK will be forced to take illegal immigrants from the ‘jungle’ are wrong.

‘Both countries are committed to helping individuals who are genuine refugees, who should apply for protection in the first safe country that they reach.

‘We expect those who are not in need of protection to return home.’

Some migrants have started holding banners protesting at the planned clear-out — even calling the slums of the Jungle their home.

The camp’s closure comes as Europe’s Justice Commissioner will today demand a change in the law to allow ‘Britain-obsessed’ asylum seekers into the UK at their earliest convenience.

Jacques Barrot, a former French minister, believes the reform would assist migrants who are sleeping rough in Calais, waiting for a chance to enter Britain.

Army units were also preparing for the destruction of the camp, which could take up to four days, as makeshift shelters will have to be destroyed.

[…]

Under current law the asylum seekers should be sent back to the country where they entered the EU.

But, referring to a proposal which would allow foreigners to claim asylum in any EU country they want, Mr Barrot said: ‘In order for the closure of the Jungle to make sense, it is necessary to share the burden between France and Great Britain.

‘There should be a solidarity within the EU over asylum.

‘National solutions to the problem are not viable.

‘The people who are in Calais have crossed Europe and have one obsession — to get to Great Britain.

‘With the modification of the current system, we should be able to convince the British to consider the claims of the asylum seekers who are stuck in the Jungle, because they have family links with the UK, or the ability to integrate thanks to the communities of their compatriots (in the UK).’

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]



Rule Britannia? Not if the EU Gets Its Way

We should have the referendum we were promised, whatever the result of the Irish vote on Lisbon

by William Rees-Mogg

Early in the election campaign of 2001, I was asked to write a couple of regional reports for The Times. I visited seats in the West Midlands, and another group in Scotland. In the West Midlands, one of the Labour women candidates was outstanding. Gisela Stuart was already a junior minister in the Department of Health. When I interviewed her I was impressed by her intellectual approach, perhaps derived from her German upbringing and early education.

At the election, she held Edgbaston, her Birmingham seat, quite comfortably, but had the misfortune to be present when Tony Blair, campaigning in a local hospital, was upset by an angry woman complaining about the poor treatment her partner was receiving for cancer.

Mr Blair seems somehow to have blamed Miss Stuart for this hitch. In his post-election reshuffle she was dropped, a loss to the Government.

She was subsequently appointed to an important role in European politics, becoming the British representative on the Presidium of the Convention on the Future of Europe, with the ex-President of France, Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, in the chair. The Presidium produced its draft for the European Constitutional treaty. That treaty was rejected in referendums held in France and the Netherlands.

Miss Stuart and her Conservative colleague on the Convention, David Heathcoat-Amory, had fought to introduce a modicum of democratic liberalism, but were overruled. President Giscard was not interested in cranky English notions of habeas corpus or electoral accountability.

After its rejection, the treaty was rewritten in a bureaucratic dialect, and resurfaced as the Lisbon treaty. Britain had been promised a referendum on the Constitutional treaty by all three parties in the 2005 general election. The Labour Government and the Liberal Democrats did not honour these commitments when it came to ratification by Parliament.

One could reasonably describe this change of policy as dishonest and shameful.

Britain is now waiting for the result of the repeated Irish referendum on October 2. In their first referendum, the Irish voted “no” to Lisbon, but now they are being asked to overrule themselves, and may do so. If this happens, there do not seem to be any further obstacles to the monstrous fraud of Lisbon being trundled past the winning post by its dubious acolytes.

Last week Miss Stuart warned of the potential constitutional consequences. She said that the Lisbon treaty puts the future of democracy in Britain at stake, that it would allow the European Union to launch power grabs unchecked, that it would leave a “democratic deficit”, in which the EU’s leaders would be accountable to no one, and that it would breach the democratic principle that voters can get rid of those in power. All of these criticisms are true and important. They would have been true of the original Constitutional treaty, which Miss Stuart and Mr Heathcoat-Amory fought to amend, and they remain true of the Lisbon treaty.

Lisbon would in effect repeal all the main legal safeguards of British liberties. The European Arrest Warrant has already repealed habeas corpus; Lisbon would repeal Magna Carta and the sovereignty of Parliament. The EU might as well have inserted a clause repealing “Rule Britannia”, and particularly the assurance that “Britons never, never, never shall be slaves”. We are already much less free than we once were.

There is also an immediate threat. The Lisbon treaty contains a proposal to create a European president, who might well be Mr Blair. Like the Mayor of London, the president of Europe will be tempted to interpret his powers so as to expand his jurisdiction. How can those who object to Mr Blair becoming president of Europe give any expression to their opposition? The Europhiles always rush to explain that the fears of Eurosceptics are mere bogies.

I would put a question to them.

How can I vote against Mr Blair as my president? Who will provide me with a ballot paper on which I could vote for some other candidate, preferably one who has not helped to trick Britain into the Lisbon treaty, without a referendum? To that question there is no answer. Mr Blair cheated the British out of a referendum; if he becomes president, there will be no referendum on that.

This faces David Cameron with a dilemma. If the Irish vote “no”, the Conservatives would undoubtedly call a referendum, but if they vote “yes”, as they probably will, the Lisbon treaty could become law before the next British election.

The constitutional issues are so serious that the Conservatives should promise to hold a referendum even if the treaty has already become law. The EU countries have known throughout that the British electorate was promised a referendum by all three parties. They were co-conspirators in the deception. They can scarcely complain if a referendum is in fact held.

If Britain were to withdraw from the Lisbon treaty because the British electorate had voted against it, that would be a healthy challenge to Europe. It is possible that the EU would then break up, but it is unlikely. The trading Europe is too valuable for Britain and the other EU countries to wish to lose it.

The Commission and Mr Blair himself might be annoyed by a British declaration of independence but Lisbon is deeply flawed, as Miss Stuart has shown. Europe, as well as Britain, would benefit from a new and more democratic approach.

[Return to headlines]



Spain: Number of Divorces Down by 13% in 2008

(ANSAmed) — MADRID, SEPTEMBER 17 — The number of divorces in Spain is in decline despite a law known as “express-divorce” passed last term by the socialist executive branch headed by José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero. In 2008, 118,939 divorces were registered, a 13.5% decrease compared to the previous year according to a report published today by the National Statistics Office. Separations decreased by 24.4%, while divorces declined by 12.5% according to the nullity, separation, and divorce statistic cited. The majority of couples that separate are less than 40-years-old and have been married on average for 15.4 years. Couples have a child who is a minor in 54% of the cases. Eighty-six percent of the time the custody of the child is given to the mother, while in 9.7% of the cases, joint custody is granted. According to some associations of separated parents, the decrease in divorces is due to the economic crisis, since many couples have difficulty paying rent and household expenses. (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Spain: Gains From Real Estate Boom Lost in a Year and a Half

(ANSAmed) — MADRID, SEPTEMBER 15 — It only took a year and a half for real estate companies to burn the gains they made in the golden years of the building boom between 2003 and 2007. Sources in the sector calculated that from January 2008 until June 2009, these companies on the whole lost 7.217 billion euros compared to 8.114 billion gained in the 5-year period of speculation. If losses continue at their current rate, according to the sources, real estate companies will see all of the gains made in the boom period lost at the end of 2009. In any case, much of the revenue, up to half, was distributed as dividends to shareholders. The only positive sign after two years of negative figures came after the first 6 months of 2009, with real estate companies quoted on the stock market in Spain able to cut their losses by 75% for a total value of 1.217 billion euros. The debt registered with the banks in the first 6 months of the year totalled 31.851 billion euros, 17% less compared to the same period in 2008. (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



The Quran on My Mind

Remarkable german documentary about the gradual radicalisation and moral deroute of Barino Barzoum. Son of a coptic christian father and german catholic mother.

It details how the Quran disguises seeds of hate and scorn as indisputable opinions of the creator of the universe. This mixture of ruthlessnes and worship has a very interesting albeit devastating influence on the believer. Making an otherwise intelligent person loose his natural capacity for making moral judgements.

Highly recommended for anyone intererested in the psychology of islamic mindgames and memes

I went through the trouble of translating and subtitling this one myself mainly because I consider it the most important german documentary about Islam. In the sequel which I hope I will be able to translate at a later time, Barino leaves Islam and joins the church of the coptic christians. And today he is one of the most dedicated and outspoken people in germany warning against the threat of radical Islam. I have this gut feeling that a day will come when everybody will know who Barino is, and thought it would be good to present this record of his years in the Abu Bakr Mosque to an international audience.

If you like the film, please recommend it to friends and family.

German Speakers can also visit his website at www.dasistislam.de/

[Return to headlines]



UK: Labour’s EU Cheerleader Blasts the Lisbon Treaty

The Labour architect of the EU’s Lisbon Treaty has warned it puts the future of democracy in Britain at stake.

Former health minister Gisela Stuart said the treaty breached the fundamental democratic principle that voters can get rid of those in power.

Just weeks before the Irish are asked to vote again on the measure, she said it would also allow the EU to launch future power grabs completely unchecked.

Miss Stuart is a pro-European who sat on the committee which drew up the original EU Constitution, later repackaged as the Lisbon Treaty.

She said it would leave a huge ‘democratic deficit’ if passed, leaving the EU’s leaders accountable to no one.

She said there would be ‘no more treaties, no more referendums anywhere’ on EU integration.

The treaty contains a ‘ratchet clause’, meaning that national vetoes can be scrapped one by one without the need for summits or referendums.

Voters will also have no power to choose or remove a new allpowerful EU president, who will be selected by EU leaders.

Tony Blair is current favourite for the post.

Miss Stuart said: ‘My basic test of democracy is: can I get rid of them? By casting a vote, you can change the people who are in control of you.

‘Lisbon does not give you, as a citizen, the means to control the executive or the politicians who decide on your behalf, and that’s the hurdle it falls on.

‘The nature of democracy is really at stake.’

Miss Stuart’s comments will increase controversy ahead of the crunch Irish vote on October2.

Voters there threw the ratification process into chaos when they rejected it last year.

Miss Stuart’s comments will embarrass Labour, which broke a promise to hold a referendum on the EU Constitution.

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]



UK: Machetes by the Door, Drugs on the Table — And Mothers Paid by the State to Have Babies With Men They Barely Know. What Have We Done to the British Family?by Harriet Sergeant

It’s the most destructive crisis of our age — a generation of violent, illiterate, lawless young men living outside civilised society.

The Mail asked a leading investigative journalist to spend nine months exploring their world.

Here, in the second part of a fascinating series, she reveals her chilling findings — and exposes how the benefit system is breeding boys condemned to a life of crime and despair because they’ve never known the benefit of a loving family. . .

When Prince opens his front door, the first thing you see is a machete hanging from a hook on the inside.

As a drug-dealer living alone on a South London estate, he needs to be on guard. With his Gucci trainers and single diamond ear-stud, he seems an unlikely candidate to be a caring father.

Yet Prince, who is of black Caribbean origin, has five children — by three different mothers — and sees them all regularly.

As he sorted out ‘sweeties’ — ecstasy tablets — on a coffee table for his night’s work, I asked him how he came to be a dad.

It always started the same way, he said: he’d start seeing a woman, and she’d tell him she was on the Pill.

Then two weeks later: ‘Bang, she gets pregnant.’ There was never any discussion about the pregnancy.

As far as he was concerned, they were barely an item at that stage — and they were certainly not about to move in together.

Prince, who is 37, laid the blame squarely on benefits: ‘Women get money from the Government; men get eradicated. What do you need a man for? The Government has taken our place.

‘I’m old-fashioned, from the ghetto, and I’m serious for my kids — but the Government is the provider now.’

Unfortunately, he is absolutely right. He may be a Peckham drug dealer, but he can clearly see what the Government has failed to register: that the benefit system is cutting fathers out of the equation.

Not only that, but it is condemning thousands more children every year to a poor start in life.

Politicians, for their part, blame the rising numbers of troubled children on the breakdown of the family and the absence of fathers.

This is a fundamental mistake: they are presuming there is a family in the first place.

Above all, the Government needs to recognise that benefits are a powerful incentive, particularly for young girls.

For the past few years, Britain has had the highest rate of teenage pregnancy in Europe, with 90 per cent of births occurring outside marriage.

The consequences are dire. Babies born to teenage mothers are 60 per cent more likely to die in their first year, compared with those born to other parents.

And 72 per cent of children born to single mothers of any age will grow up in poverty.

Two young men from council estates as far apart as the South Coast and the North-East told me girls giving birth at 16 or 17 were no longer the exception in their area, but the norm.

‘They only go down that path because not too many paths are open to them. By 18 or 19, they’ve got two kids,’ one of them said.

Over the past nine months, I have been investigating why teenage boys from low-income white and black Caribbean backgrounds are the most at risk of failing at school, and of being sidelined into a life of benefits and crime.

I talked to dozens of these boys themselves, as well as to men in their 20s and 30s from the same background — and found that most of them had grown up in single-parent families.

The cycle seemed likely to be repeated with their own children.

A young white man from the North-East, recently released from prison, told me: ‘If I had a father, I would have got a good hiding and I probably wouldn’t be here now.’

His 17-year-old friend, who is on the police list of top-ten troublemakers in his town, nodded. ‘You need a dad for growing up,’ he said.

An overhaul of the benefit system is clearly at the heart of transforming the lives of disadvantaged children. But to accuse their mothers of being feckless is unjust: they are merely responding to the economics of the situation.

They have grasped the consequences of our poor education system better than our politicians ever have.

Last year, less than half of teenagers finished compulsory schooling with five good GSCEs that included maths and English. Of those, the ones who do worst of all are children from lowincome families.

Then what happens? The boys take to crime — and the girls get pregnant.

Incredibly, more than a quarter of British children are now raised in single-parent families — and nine out of ten of them are headed by women.

Children with one parent, according to research by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, are more likely to have behavioural problems, to do less well at school, have sex earlier, suffer from depression and turn to drugs and heavy drinking.

And, according to evidence from the U.S., they are more likely to get involved with gangs and crime.Four out of ten of these children will have no contact at all with their fathers by the age of three. Indeed, for many boys, their first experience of spending any significant time with adult males is when they enter prison.

Prince, however, is determined not to let that happen with his own three daughters and two sons. On the day we met, he’d taken his eldest daughter, aged ten, to her new private secondary school, for which he is paying the fees.

Proudly showing me a photograph of her dressed in school uniform and playing the piano at a school concert, he commented: ‘The school’s wicked. They discipline the children and she learns the right values.’

Then he pointed to the ecstasy tablets on his coffee table. ‘When she’s here, I never discuss business or have weapons or pills lying around.

‘Estate people leave everything in front of their kids: knives, guns, their stash, the lot. Not me,’ he said, nodded emphatically. ‘I try and show her the right way.’

By ensuring his daughter has a good education, he is doing the one thing most likely to give her a chance of escaping poverty and making a success of her life.

What future is there in Britain today for a girl without qualifications?

Skilled and hard-working immigrants now monopolise menial jobs, and the next step up — a job, for example, in catering or hairdressing — pays about £10,000 a year before tax.

Which is slightly less than a girl with two children receives in benefits, and without the incentive of somewhere to live rent-free.

In Streatham, South London, I overheard two young girls pushing buggies talking about a friend. ‘Why she got pregnant?’ asked one. ‘She’s got a good job!’

In other words, if you were in well-paid employment, with good prospects, there was no reason to have children.

Sir Norman Bettison, chief constable of West Yorkshire Police, summed up the situation starkly: ‘We are talking here about the perverting influence of welfare. The more kids you have, the more money you get.’

Nor does that include the extras the mothers receive from the fathers of their various children.

As Prince pointed out: ‘All those little trainers and bikes — £50 here, £40 there. If I had no children, I’d be a rich man now.’

Many single mothers are excellent parents, of course. But the Government has put disadvantaged girls in a position where the only career open to them, the only possibility of an independent life, is to have children — whether they want to or not, whether they are likely to be good mothers or not.

The state, as Prince pointed out, has indeed taken over the role of both husband and employer.

With a combination of financial incentives and poor schools, it is ensuring a steady supply of babies who start life with all the factors in place to become the next generation living on benefits or the proceeds of crime.

What is the Government doing about this cynical cycle of deprivation?

Over the past few years, it has come up with a plethora of schemes to intervene ever earlier in the life of a disadvantaged child. In other words, it has concentrated on the consequences of single parenthood — but not the cause.

Failing to address the poor education on offer at too many of our schools and the incentive of benefits is self-defeating.

What is the point of setting targets to end child poverty when the Government’s policies are creating tomorrow’s poorest children — and grandchildren? Between 1979 and 2003, the number of single parents more than doubled — from 1.4million to 3.2million.

Even Government advisors acknowledge that this is a major factor in the increase in child poverty.

So why hasn’t the Government reformed the benefit system? It’s as if they’re offering car drivers a bonus for every crash — then acting surprised when accidents shoot up.

Boys with two parents are more likely to attend school regularly; they are also far less likely to be thrown out of school.

There is a wealth of research to show that boys, in particular, need fathers — but single mothers don’t always see it that way.

In Manchester, I visited Simone, the mother of three boys from three different fathers — all well-known criminals in her community.

An attractive, slender black woman in her 30s, with elaborately tattooed shoulders, she was bouncing a baby on her lap in the sitting-room of her council flat.

At a side-table, next to an empty bottle of Moet and Chandon, her 18-year- old son Dion, who’d recently been convicted of driving without a licence, was folding up a pile of ironed clothes.

Dion had begun truanting in Year 9, and now Simone didn’t know what to do with him. ‘His school should have got the kids out more, taken them away on holidays and at weekends. One day’s work experience would have helped,’ she complained.

The idea of going to college held no appeal for Dion. ‘I can’t sit in one place too long,’ he said.

Simone commented: ‘You talk and talk and talk until you tired of talking. I don’t want him to be a lawyer.’ She turned to him: ‘Just do your ting on the side [sell drugs] and have a job.’

Dion, she said, spends ‘too much time’ hanging about with his friends. ‘It’s boring, they’re in each other’s face all the time.

‘That’s where this violence comes from — boredom. One’s got better trainers than another and they kick off.’

When I asked Dion about his father, he said: ‘I don’t know where he is — he’s never played a part in my life.’ Did Simone feel he lacked a father figure? ‘Once upon a time, I would have said it didn’t matter,’ she said. ‘Now I think it’s important. You do need a man around.’

Simone is obviously a loving mother, but she had Dion at 16 and has never worked.

It hasn’t occurred to her to march her son down to the local college to sign up; nor does she know anyone in work to give him a helping hand.

This is crucial because, according to Britain’s chief inspector of schools, boys like Dion are unlikely to get it from school.

The requirement to include ‘ work-related’ and ‘enterprise learning’ in secondary schools has not yet been ‘embraced wholeheartedly’ by all, she admitted in her annual report.

The result? The number of vulnerable young people like Dion — who are not in education, employment or training — ‘is alarming and unacceptable’.

The contrast between Dion and a group of boys living on an estate not 15 minutes’ walk away was sharp. They looked similar: all seven of them, aged between 13 and 15, were wearing hoodies; and when I came across them, they were jumping up and down on a garage roof and throwing things to the ground.

But unlike Dion, these boys — one Somali, one Iraqi, two white, two black and one mixed race — could talk confidently about what they expected to be doing in five years’ time.

The two white boys were attending Cadets and thinking about joining the Army.

Mustapha explained he wanted to be a plumber because ‘most of my dad’s friends are plumbers’ — and they’d offered him work experience.

Raphael played a lot of sport and planned to be a PE teacher. Hussain was going to be an engineer, like his uncle: ‘My dad drops me off at my uncle’s most weekends and he shows me what he’s doing.’

What effect does a father have, I asked? ‘You want to follow in their footsteps,’ said one, and they loudly chorused their agreement.

Only Gabriel had relied on his mother to find him work experience. And Cody planned to work for his mother’s boyfriend, who’d come out of prison, failed to find a job and started his own scrap-metal business.

As far as they knew, the families of their classmates weren’t making any effort to find activities for them. ‘So they go out,’ said Mustapha. ‘And follow bad boys.’

Steve said he knew his dad was sending him to Cadets ‘because he doesn’t want me getting into gangs. I could get seriously injured and hurt.’

And, poignantly, Raphael added:

‘Everyone will give up on you, but a dad doesn’t because he’s your dad.’

Later, I talked to Bigs, a black man in his late 20s who is the former leader of one of the most notorious gangs in Brixton, South London.

There was a big divide at school, he said, between those who had single parents and the mainly white boys who had fathers.

At primary school, the boys ‘had all started from the same place.’ But when they all began misbehaving at 14, the white boys’ fathers would send them off to the Cadets or to their mates, who worked in various manual trades, for training.

The father of one boy — ‘a nut case, a real live-wire,’ according to Bigs — took him to the Cadets and told the colonel: ‘I don’t care what you do to my boy, but he’s going down the wrong road and needs straightening out.’ Bigs, who was brought up by a single mother, wasn’t so lucky.

Far from being taken in hand, he was serving his first jail sentence at 15.

The absence of a male role model has a particularly profound effect on disadvantaged boys during their teenage years.

A third of 14-to-25-year-olds questioned for a survey by the Prince’s Trust did not have a parent whom they considered a role model.

More than half said they’d joined a gang to acquire a sense of identity, while a quarter said they were in search of someone to look up to.

These boys are unlikely to find male role models in schools. The number of male teachers has slumped to its lowest level in at least 20 years; and in primary school, 85 per cent of teachers are female. Even in youth offending teams, women make up the majority of the staff.

This year, according to the latest research, one in three children who live with a single mother will spend less than six hours a week with a male role model — whether a father figure, relative or teacher.

All the odds are stacked against them. Even children on the ‘at risk’ register are five times more likely to have single teenage mothers — as Prince knows all too well.

Two of his children, he discovered recently, were being neglected by their 19-year-old mother.

‘The house was like a crack house: dirty clothes everywhere,’ he said. ‘She fed them crappy food, she left the kids [to] fall asleep in front of the TV. My boy was underweight and quiet.’

Social services removed the children and gave them to their maternal grandmother to bring up. But Prince’s ex-girlfriend, he says, has made no attempt to get her children back.

He shrugged. ‘She’s never had a job. She’s lived off the Government and what men give her.’

Now, she is pregnant by another man. Having another baby, she has told her friends, will allow her to keep her council flat.

           — Hat tip: Zenster [Return to headlines]



UK: Mandelson, Blair and a Sordid Little Ploy to Deny British Voters a Choice on the European Superstate

A new and swanky European Union headquarters is being planned in Brussels at a cost of £280million. Named the Residence Palace, it will contain the no doubt sumptuous offices of the first President of the EU, as well as of its first Foreign Minister.

The man who hopes to become President of Europe is none other than our own Tony Blair.

According to an authoritative new book, the sole remaining raison d’etre of this Government is to see Mr Blair safely installed as President, picking up the telephone as Europe’s number one politician to chew the cud on equal terms with Barack Obama.

The book is by the political journalist Adam Boulton, a New Labour insider married to Anji Hunter, a former close aide of Mr Blair’s. If anyone has worthwhile insights into what is going on in the ex-Prime Minister’s mind, it is Mr Boulton. He says Lord Mandelson is propping up Gordon Brown only so that his friend Tony Blair can become President of Europe.

What we have here is a nasty little plot, chiefly orchestrated by Lord Mandelson, whose overwhelming purpose is to see the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty and, if at all possible, secure the coronation of Tony Blair as President. Even the timing of the General Election is part of the plot.

[…]

The trouble is that once the treaty has been ratified, it will be difficult for the Tories to unpick it, as it will have become part of European law accepted by every member state.

The reason Lord Mandelson wants the General Election to be held next June, which is the latest possible date, is not because he seriously believes that Gordon Brown has an earthly chance of winning by leaving it until then. He would like to provide as much time as possible for the treaty to be ratified before David Cameron arrives in No 10.

Yesterday’s ICM poll only confirms what we already knew — that most people want a referendum on the treaty because they oppose further integration. That, of course, is why the Government does not wish to give us a referendum. Gordon Brown bangs on about listening to the people, but when the people want something he does not approve of, he closes his mind and ears, and carries on regardless.

The Tories are admittedly in a difficult position for the reason I have mentioned. How could they renege on a treaty which had already been ratified, forming the new legal basis of the European Union? They could hardly deny the legitimacy of the President of Europe, be it Tony Blair or anyone else, or pretend that he did not exist.

That said, their present position is a potentially weak one. Their policy is to hope against hope that President Klaus, or conceivably the Polish President, will hold out until June and a Tory victory in the

General Election. In that case, there would be a referendum which would almost certainly lead to a ‘No’ vote, and the Lisbon Treaty would come crashing down across Europe. Unlike Ireland, Britain is too big and important a country for its people to be forced by Brussels to vote again.

But this is to leave too much to chance. The Czechs and the Poles are unlikely to stand firm against bullying and intimidation. It is not good enough for the Tories to say cryptically that, in the circumstances of the treaty having already been ratified when they came to power, they would not ‘stand idly by’.

That is too vague. If it becomes necessary, a new Conservative government should hold a referendum on Lisbon and, if that led to a rejection of the treaty, insist on its renegotiation. Anything less would be a betrayal of the British people, who have been cheated by this Government.

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]



UK: Nanny State Snatches Kids for Being Too Fat

‘This whole case has been dreadful; neither of these parents takes drugs’

A couple soon expecting their seventh child has had their fifth and sixth taken by social workers after warnings that the family needed to slim down their overweight kids or risk losing custody.

The unnamed 39-year-old mother from Dundee, Scotland, told the United Kingdom’s The Sun newspaper, “This is every family’s worst nightmare.”

Scotland’s television station STV reports the family was warned last year that they risk losing all of their kids, ages 3 to 13, unless the children lost weight. At the time, the youngest, a girl, weighed 56 pounds. The oldest, a boy, has since grown to over 220 pounds.

“This whole case has been dreadful,” said Kathleen Price, the couple’s attorney. “Neither of these parents takes drink or drugs. They have a big, happy, noisy family, which is prone to being overweight.”

Price added, “To remove their children for that reason is scandalous. They had their children taken from them … and have no idea where they are. I have also had to warn them I believe social workers will enter the labor suite when their new baby arrives next month. They feel they are being victimized and are a complete mess.”

The family’s 3- and 4-year-old have been moved into foster care, and STV reports the parents have been told “active steps” are being taken to remove the remaining children as well.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



UK: The Debate About Our Membership of the EU Has Always Been About Sovereignty

SIR — The articles and letters on the EU during the last week have been excellent, and have shown what many of us felt 35 years ago — that the issue about Britain and Europe would run and run.

However, a frequent misleading comment on the 1975 referendum is that we thought we were only voting about a trading bloc. I took an active part in 1975 in the “Get Britain Out” campaign. Both sides of the argument knew that sovereignty was the key issue. Ted Heath denied we would lose it. Others said it was an outdated illusion. It is disingenuous for people now to say that they thought the referendum was only about trade. Referendums are not offered on trade treaties.

James Lewis Wembley, Middlesex

***

SIR — Your explanation of “How EU law reaches us” (September 17) doesn’t reveal the whole frightening process. This is that the unelected Commission enjoys the monopoly to propose all EU law in secret. Their proposals are then negotiated, again in secret, by bureaucrats from nation states, in the Committee of Permanent Representatives. When the horse-trading is complete, the proposed laws go to the Council of Ministers for decision, still in secret, where the UK has 8 per cent of the vote.

The EU Parliament cannot propose legislation, but can amend and even block some of it. It doesn’t do so, of course, because it is loath to delay or derail the gravy train.

British Governments have promised for many years that they won’t agree to any new law in the Council which is still being “scrutinised” (that’s all we can do) in the select committee of either House of Parliament. But they have broken that promise 435 times in the last six years.

Our Parliament is powerless to change any of the laws, which are then enforced by the Commission and the Luxembourg Court, against which there is no appeal. And they call this “the democratic deficit”.

Lord Pearson of Rannoch London SW1

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]

Mediterranean Union


EU: EP: Panzeri (PD), Maghreb One of Our Priorities

(ANSAmed) — BRUSSELS, SEPTEMBER 17 — “The delegation is committed over the coming months to concentrating on three geographical priorities”: this was the programme announced today by Antonio Panzeri, Euro MP and member of the PD party (Asde group), who was elected President of the Delegation for Relations with the Maghreb countries and the Union of the Arab Maghreb in the European Parliament today. Panzeri spoke about the organisation “of inter-parliamentary meetings with Tunisia and Libya, and the setting up of a joint parliamentary commission with Morocco. Finally our activities with focus on policies of building relationships, cooperation for development and problems of immigration in relation to the relevant parliamentary commissions”. Panzeri is already a member of the Foreign Affairs and Internal Markets Commission for the protection of consumers, and a member of the Delegation to the Euromediterranean Parliamentary Assembly.(ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



EU: Strengthen Women’s Roles With Tangible Plan of Action

(ANSAmed) — BRUSSELS, SEPTEMBER 17 — Moving from words to actions: to give women a greater role in society, a tangible plan of action is necessary with objectives and a timeframe. This is the proposal made by the EU that emerged from the guidelines approved by the EU Council of Foreign Ministers in view of the second Mediterranean Union (MU) meeting of ministers, which will be held in Marrakesh, Morocco on November 11-12 and will focus on strengthening the role of women in society. Promoting equal rights between men and women is a priority for EU neighbourhood policy, which involves EU partner countries (Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, the occupied Palestinian Territories, Syria, and Tunisia). But according to the report from 2008, “in general, the participation of women in social, political, and economic life still has to be strengthened at various levels”. Specifically, “discrimination against women” was stressed as well as “violence perpetrated by family members against women, which remains widespread”. This does not take away from the fact that several EU partner states in the Mediterranean are acting on this front, including Egypt, Jordan, and Morocco, with specific bilateral programmes regarding equal gender rights. Despite the existence of important obstacles,” continued the report, “numerous countries have taken steps to continue to promote equality between men and women.” But there is still a long way to go, and in the wake of the experience of the Euro-Mediterranean conference in Istanbul in 2006, now Europe is considering new developments for the next meeting of the 43 countries of the MU, formulating a specific plan of action that is “more targeted and realistic with an operative plan that is accompanied by a strategy, objectives, and a timeframe, equipped with human and financial resources from external financial instruments already existing in the EU”. The priorities and actions must be defined for political, economic, cultural, and social rights for women. For example, taking the current economic crisis into account, they should aim at equality in terms of salaries between the different genders and female entrepreneurship. The EU, proposes establishing adequate mechanisms that follow the progress of the process that are objective and allow for verifications to be made on the various commitments. In this sense, the EU has various ideas, including a progress report, creating measurable national or regional indicators, or instituting a fixed network of observers and a committee defining the responsibilities at a regional, national, and European level. Society, NGO, and union participation should also be pointed out, with whom the EU Commission has proposed preparing a meeting that will proceed or follow the upcoming conference. Certainly, the EU will make its instruments available, and possibly the ministers themselves, suggest EU guidelines, will “propose making gender equality issues among the priorities for the realisation of projects in the framework for the Mediterranean Union”. (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Morocco: 1 of 4 Km of New Roads Financed by EU Funds

(ANSAmed) — BRUSSELS, SEPTEMBER 15 — One out of every four kilometres of the roads built today in Morocco is financed by the EU funds allocated for the transport sector. Through the programme that supports reforms in the sector, according to the information published on the ENPI site (www.enpi-info.eu), the EU supplies aid to projects for road and maritime transport, as well as the port and airport systems, for which Morocco has already signed the Euro-Mediterranean treaty, with the reciprocal opening of the markets (Open Sky). The EU therefore contributes to diverse initiatives beginning with the development of motorways, for example the enlargement of the Casablanca-Rabat, a north-south axis, on which work will conclude in 2011, o the new connection between Fez and Oujda, which started work in 2007, lengthening the Rabat-Meknez-Fez, creating a east-west axis. Next year work on the Marrakesh-Agadir motorway is scheduled to finish. Moreover, the European partner in encouraging Morocco’s government to change the rules of road circulation, giving an incentive to the safety factor. In total, between 2003 and 2008, the EU’s contribution to the entire transport sector in Morocco was 96 million euros.(ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]

North Africa


Algeria: Instructions for Circumcisions

(ANSAmed) — ALGIERS, SEPTEMBER 15 — In preparation for the “night of destiny”, the 27th day of Ramadan which will fall on Thursday, during which thousands of children are traditionally circumcised in Algeria, the Ministry of Health has released a statement “to protect health and integrity”. “The act of circumcision”, the statement quoted by APS reads, “must be carried out by a surgeon in a public or private healthcare structure”. A preventative measure “to avoid the painful incidents that occur and the transformation of an act of joy and faith into a moment of grief”. Every year numerous cases are recorded with health problems, sometimes serious, that derive from circumcision practiced rudimentarily and by unspecialised personnel. For the “night of destiny”, when as tradition has it, the Archangel Gabriel revealed the first verses of the Koran to the Prophet Mohammed, collective circumcision ceremonies are organised throughout the country.(ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Egypt: Sorour: Commitment Against Organised Crime Needed

(by Cristiana Missori) (ANSAmed) — ROME, SEPTEMBER 15 — Security, the fight against organised crime and drug trafficking, the development of parliamentary diplomacy: Egypt will be able to give a contribution in all of these sectors. The President of the Egyptian People’s Assembly, Ahmed Fathi Sorour, is convinced of it. In an interview with ANSAmed, he addressed without reticence the difficult question of human rights during the same period in which the Egyptian National Council for Human Rights is sending its report to the United Nations on the efforts made by the country to support fundamental liberties. Sorour left Rome with positive results, after having taken part last weekend in the eighth meeting of G8 parliamentary representatives, which for the first time included emerging countries (Mexico, Brazil, China, India, South Africa and Egypt). “The analysis traced in the report made by the deputy secretary general of the UN, Antonio Costa, gave me the possibility to propose some recommendations that were welcomed by the speaker”, explained Sorour, adding that in this meeting, and more in general, the summit between parliamentary leaders can play an important role to encourage dialogue between governments. A famous jurist, elected for the first time to the People’s Assembly in 1989 as part of the National-Democratic Party, Sorour has led Egypt’s Lower House since 1991. It is a rather uncomfortable position for one of the most illustrious criminal lawyers in the country, with a fixation on human rights. Human rights which, in recent days, return to the centre of attention with the reception by the Council for Human Rights in Geneva of the official report sent by the Egyptian National Council which asks for, among other things, the national government in Cairo to end torture in prisons, the repeal of special laws and the death penalty, as well as more protection for the freedom of expression. “Our organisation already condemns torture”, Sorour replied. “It is true that we must spread the concept, including new cases in point”. As for the repeal of the special laws (which have been in vigour since the assignation of President Sadat in 1981), on the basis of which anyone can be held for any length of time, without being charged or tried by a court of law, responded: “Every country has its own emergency legislation which is passed to combat external and internal threats to the state”. The emergency laws, he observed, “have been modified over the years, reducing their scope, but our objective is that of repealing them once and for all by passing an anti-terrorism law”. As for the appeal supporting norms that ensure the free flow of information and the protection of the right to expression of the bloggers who criticise the work of the government, Sorour warned, “it is necessary to be careful about who uses the internet, because defamation is a crime”.(ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Energy: Gas: In 2014, Algeria Will Export 85 Bln M3

(ANSAmed) — ALGIERS, SEPTEMBER 15 — “Algeria will gradually increase its gas exports until it will reach, in 2014, 85 billion cubic metres per year,” compared to the 58.8 cubic metres exported in 2008. The news was announced by the Algerian Minister for Energy and Mining, Chakib Khelil, in an interview to specialized publication The Arab Oil & Gas Magazine. Khelil also spoke about the projects aiming to increase the gas export capacity of the country, as the Transmed (a gas pipeline to Italy, crossing Tunisia) and the Galsi (a gas pipeline which will directly link Algeria to Sardinia). “The 85 billion cubic metres objective,” he added, “will be reached following the completion of the Medgaz project,” which will move 8 billion cubic metres of Algerian gas to Spain. “The three pipelines will allow us to increase gas exports roughly by 21 billion cubic metres per year,” Khelil explained, “to which we must add the LNG units from Skikda (East) and Arzew(West), with a further 15 billion cubic metres”. (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Finmeccanica: Stampa, 100 Helicopter Contract With Algeria

(ANSAmed)- ALGIERS, SEPTEMBER 16 — The Italian company Agusta Westland of the Finmeccanica Group is reported to have signed at the end of June a contract with the Algerian ministry of defence for supply of 100 helicopters of various types. The contract, according to an article in the specialised magazine Air Force Monthly and reprinted in the Algerian press, includes 100 helicopters for the gendarmerie, the police and civil protection agency which will be assembled in Algeria, a decision was made on the wishes of the Algerian government to begin developing the country’s aeronautic industry. Finmeccanica, continues the magazine report, already won a contract with the Algerian navy for six AW101s helicopters and four Super Lynx 300 MK 130. The first Super Lynx should be delivered shortly. (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Internet: Study Shows Algerians Getting to Love the Web

(ANSAmed) — ALGIERS, SEPTEMBER 17 — Algerians have become Internet freaks and consider it “an indispensible tool”. According to a study carried out for WebDialna (in Algerian, our Web’) by the country’s Medcom and Ideatic, to look into the habits and interests of Algeria’s internauts’, as well as their impressions of such matters as broadband ADSL, advertising on the web and e-commerce. WebDialna was created from a sample of nearly 6 thousand web surfers of the 4.5 million people, or 12.8% of the population, online in Algeria. 75% of those interviewed stated that ‘internet is an indispensible tool’ and more than 90% confessed not being able to get by without going online ‘at least once a day’ spending an average of ‘between one hour and two hours a day in front of the screen’. Two thirds of web users were men (74.2%) and university graduates (66.2%), with women comprising a mere 25.8%. The three most widespread ways of using the net were: simply sending and receiving mail 82.6%; habitual use of search engines 80.7%; seeking business contacts 22,9%.(ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Libya: Commission, Algerian Prisoners Were Tortured

(ANSAmed)- ALGIERS, SEPTEMBER 16 — Twenty seven Algerians released from detention a few days ago in Libya were tortured during the imprisonment. The statement was made in Algiers by Farouk Ksentini, the president of the government’s national commission on human rights. “Unfortunately, the 26 Algerians suffered acts of torture”, Ksentini told the press. “These practices are not humane and we ask that they stop”, he added. The group of Algerian prisoners were released after long negotiations with the Algerian authorities while “another 30 Algerians”, according to Ksentini, “are still in prison in Libya.” Most of the detainees are accused of theft and drug trafficking. (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



TLC: Egyptian Mobile Phone Subrscribers Top 50 Millions

(ANSAmed) — CAIRO, SEPTEMBER 17 — The number of mobile phone subscribers in Egypt rose by more than 1.7 million to 50.069 million at the end of July from 48.311 million at the end of June, a government website said . The country had 41.272 million subscribers at the start of the year, the government-run Egyptian Cabinet Information and Decision Support Centre said on its website. Mobile subscribers in the most populous Arab country have been rising by roughly 1 million a month since February 2008.(ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]

Israel and the Palestinians


Netanyahu Pardons Terrorists Who Killed Israelis

Continues controversial policy in spite of deadly track record

TEL AVIV — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government has quietly continued a controversial practice of granting amnesty to terrorists as a gesture to help bolster Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

Last week, Israel pardoned 13 members of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, the declared military wing of Abbas’ Fatah organization.

According to information obtained by WND, seven of the pardoned gunmen were directly responsible for killing Israelis, while 11 of the 13 are accused of collaborating in attacks in which Israelis were murdered.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]



PNA: USA Agrees on State by 2011

(ANSAmed) — RAMALLAH, SEPTEMBER 16 — The United States agree on the objective indicated by the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) for the creation of the conditions for the proclamation of an independent Palestinian State, in peace and side-by-side with Israel, in two years’ time. The staff of the president of the PNA, Mahmud Abbas (Abu Mazen), said that they were convinced in quotes today by on-line media from the meetings in the area with President Barack Obama’s special emissary to the Middle East, George Mitchell. According to the sources, Mitchell made it understood that Washington looks favourably on the plan recently illustrated by the Premier of the PNA, Salam Fayyad, centred on the necessity of the creation by 2011 of the economic and institutional conditions for a de facto Palestinian State. The USA, the sources said, show that they are determined to jump-start the peace process quickly, in spite of the attempts made by the Israeli government of Benyamin Netanyahu to “stall”. They also seem decided in insisting on the request of the complete freezing of Jewish settlements in particular, asked by the Palestinians as a pre-condition for negotiations on the Road Map. Mitchell continued again today the shuttle from Jerusalem, where he met with Netanyahu again this morning, and the residence of Abbas in Ramallah (West Bank). The climate in Jerusalem has been defined as “good”, but for now signs of a definitive agreement are lacking. With Netanyahu, who is contrary to a complete stop to settlements, yet another meeting has been planned for Friday.(ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]

Middle East


Compassion: The Islamic Republic Style

by Amil Imani

It is not true that the Islamic Republic of Iran lacks compassion. It is not true that the Islamic Republic hangs people without a hint of mercy. Here is the proof.

Recently, I met Mrs. M at a gathering of Iranian ex-pats in a park. I would also like you to meet this elderly widow who is suffering from a variety of brain, neurological, and vision disorders. She is a lone woman without a country, moving from one shelter to the next on her way to the final resting place to which we all are destined…

           — Hat tip: Amil Imani [Return to headlines]



Emirates: 70% Rise in Companies Violating Labour Laws

(ANSAmed) — DUBAI, SEPTEMBER 17 — The number of companies caught violating regulations prescribing work breaks during the hottest part of the day has gone up by 70%. The figures comes in a report by daily paper, The National, which stresses how the numbers of inspections have risen since considerably last summer. A law enacted in 2005 demands that — on pain of a 2,000-euro fine and a 3-month recruitment stop — it is forbidden to work outside between the hours of 12.30 and 15.00 during the summer months, as temperatures reach as high as 48 degrees, possibly leading to dehydration and fainting. Companies reported this year of ignoring the law totalled 667, the Ministry reports. The Emirate with the highest number of violations was Dubai (176) and that with the least was Sharjah (33). The United Arab Emirates have often come under fire from Human Rights organisations, with a series of initiatives to protect workers being set up since 2002. These include more frequent inspections and the opening of a complaints counter at the Ministry of Labour where abuse can be reported. The latest damning report from Human Rights Watch, in May, still found these measures insufficient. (ANSAmed)

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Italy-Lebanon: New University Cooperation Programme

(ANSAmed) — BEIRUT, SEPTEMBER 16 — Rome’s La Sapienza University and the Saint Exprit University in Kaslik (Usek), north of Beirut, will launch a new interuniversity cooperation programme called ‘University Cooperation for Peace and Development’ in January. The masters course, financed by the Italian Foreign Ministry, aims to deal with the principle issues of peace, development and civil coexistence in Lebanon. Cooperation for development, international economy, the environment, public health and the role of peace missions will be at the heart of issues dealt with. The masters, which will end in the summer of 2011 with the presentation of theses by students, includes joint lessons which will be given by Italian and Lebanese professors, both in Italy and in Lebanon. Twenty Lebanese students from the Lebanese University (the only state university in Lebanon) and the Saint Exprit University in Kaslik will receive scholarships. Together with La Sapienza, the universities of Pavia and Palermo will also be directly involved in teaching and in the reception of Lebanese students. (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Kuwait: Woman Guilty of Mass Murder Will Sue Minister

(ANSAmed) — DUBAI, SEPTEMBER 16 — The woman that, in August, set fire to the marquee where her former husband’s wedding was being celebrated, causing the death of 49 between women and children, will sue the Interior Minister for losing her unborn baby while in jail. The news was reported by United Arab Emirates’ newspaper ‘The National’. “I was pregnant at the time of arrest and I lost my baby following the abuses suffered in jail. This is why I will sue the Interior Minister,” said the woman, who, after having first admitted to the crime, is now proclaiming her innocence, and blaming her state of shock for her earlier confession. “I was arrested,” she said, “only because my sister-in-law accused me”.(ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



Post Report Sparks Congressional Anger at Saudis Over Israel Boycott

By Michael Freund

Leading Democratic and Republican congressmen expressed outrage following a report in last Monday’s Jerusalem Post that Saudi Arabia has been violating its promise to Washington to stop enforcing the Arab League boycott of Israel.

Democrat Howard Berman of California, Chairman of the powerful House Foreign Affairs Committee, told the Post from Washington that he had read the report in Monday’s paper.

“This is a very disturbing report,” Berman said, “particularly in light of the fact that US officials assured us four years ago that Saudi Arabia would abandon the boycott as the condition for its entry into the World Trade Organization.”

Berman declared that he would take action on the issue.

“I intend to pursue this matter with the administration,” he said.

Across the aisle, Congressman Mike Pence of Indiana, who chairs the House Republican Conference, also criticized Riyadh for its duplicity.

“Saudi Arabia’s disregard of its 2005 pledge to end the boycott against Israel is unacceptable,” Pence told the Post.

“Congress and the administration must hold Saudi Arabia accountable. The United States cannot stand by and continue to witness this mistreatment towards the peace-loving people of Israel,” he said.

“Ending the Arab League boycott and establishing trade relationships with Israel would help foster much needed peace in the region,” Pence added.

Last week, the Post revealed that the Saudis have been steadily intensifying their enforcement of the anti-Israel trade embargo in recent years, despite a November 2005 pledge to Washington to desist in exchange for admittance into the World Trade Organization.

A review of Commerce Department figures conducted by the Post found that the number of boycott-related and restrictive trade-practice requests received by American companies from Saudi Arabia has increased in each of the past two years, rising by more than 76 percent between 2006 and 2008.

US law bars American companies from complying with such demands, and requires them to report any boycott-related requests to the federal government.

The Saudi boycott of Israeli-made goods is part of the decades-old Arab League effort to isolate and weaken the Jewish state economically.

Washington has been attempting to get Riyadh to improve relations with Israel, thus far without success.

           — Hat tip: Michael Freund [Return to headlines]



Turkey: Journalist Sentenced for Insulting President

(ANSAmed) — ANKARA, SEPTEMBER 15 — Today, a Turkish journalist was given an 11 months suspended prison sentence by a court in the city of Adana, in the southern part of the country, as she was found guilty of insulting president Abdullah Gul and his Islamic-rooted party(AKP). The news was announced by local TV stations. The journalist, Sevda Turaclar, was taken to court by Abdullah Gul, by the premier Tayyip Erdogan and by former Finance Minister Kemal Unakitan for publishing a joke, sent by e-mail by an anonymous reader, on non-religious newspaper Ekspres.(ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]



‘We May Have to Attack Iran by Dec.’

Israel will be compelled to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities if Western powers do not impose serious sanctions against Teheran by the end of 2009, former deputy defense minister Ephraim Sneh said on Wednesday.

“We cannot live under the shadow of an Iran with nuclear weapons,” he was quoted as telling Reuters in an interview on a visit to the UK. “By the end of the year, if there is no agreement on crippling sanctions aimed at this regime, we will have no choice.”

Sneh reportedly stressed that a military strike would be “the very, very last resort. But ironically it is our best friends and allies who are pushing us into a corner where we would have no option but to do it.”

“I wonder if they will [put a tougher sanctions regime in place] quickly enough. If not, we are compelled to take action.”

Sneh, who holds no position in the government and was speaking in his personal capacity, told Reuters it was not clear the US and EU had the decisiveness to take such steps, which should include tougher banking and oil curbs, by year’s end. He added that the need for the involvement of “Russia and China is a myth,” as strict sanctions imposed by the West would be tough enough to work.

“It is bloodless, and it even stops short of a naval blockade,” he said.

Sneh reportedly explained that Jerusalem could not accept a nuclear-armed Iran because government processes would be “substantially distorted,” as the cabinet’s decision making would be hostage to the fear of Teheran’s nuclear retaliation.

If the Islamic republic completes its military nuclear program, immigration to Israel would stop, young men and women would emigrate to pursue their future in places seen as more secure and investment in Israel would be reduced, he reportedly said.

The former deputy minister also warned that Iran would pressure moderate Arab states to toughen their positions vis-a-vis Israel, and that a nuclear Iran would prompt Saudi Arabia and Egypt to obtain nuclear weapons themselves, bringing about a Middle East “fully loaded with nuclear weapons.”

[Return to headlines]

Russia


Defense: Moscow Asks Ankara to Buy Russian Missiles

(ANSAmed) — ANKARA, SEPTEMBER 16 — The Russians have prepared a $9.5 billion offer for Turkey against US Patriot missiles worth $7.8 billion, daily Vatan reports. “Buy our missiles; they are stronger and we will cut the price”, Leonid Gladchenko, spokesperson for Russia’s giant arms producer Rosoboron Export, told Vatan, adding that “we will also propose two new systems to Turkey besides S-300V air defense missile systems. Our systems are stronger and cheaper than Patriots. I think Turkey will buy them”. “There may be some reduction and e will join the tender with very flexible alternatives”, Gladchenko declared. Besides the United States, Turkey received missile defense system proposals from Russia and China. (ANSAmed).

           — Hat tip: Insubria [Return to headlines]

South Asia


Afghanistan: New Zealand Sends Special Forces to Boost Force

Wellington, 21 Sept.(AKI) — New Zealand has sent 71 members of its special forces to boost NATO forces in Afghanistan and support the government of president Hamid Karzai, prime minister John Key said on Monday. Accusations of widespread fraud are calling into question Karzai’s dominant position in last month’s vote count.

His legitimacy is seen as key to the country’s future democracy and stability.

Quoted by New Zealand public radio, Key refused to specify what the SAS mission was but he described it as a dangerous assignment, and said he could not rule out the possibility of casualties.

He said the SAS forces would be deployed for 12 to 18 months.

The SAS troops will be under the control of the commander of the NATO international security assistance force in Afghanistan, but overall command will be retained by the chief of the New Zealand defence force, through an SAS commander in the field, Key said.

Another group of about 130 New Zealand troops is working in central Afghanistan’s Bamiyan province on civilian reconstruction projects.

Key made the announcement as the top US and NATO commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, warned that the NATO-led mission in Afghanistan could fail “within the next 12 months” unless a genuine counter-insurgency strategy is implemented and countries send more soldiers.

McChrystal made the warning in an urgent, confidential 66-page assessment of the war that was obtained by US daily The Washington Post.

“Failure to gain the initiative and reverse insurgent momentum in the near-term (next 12 months) — while Afghan security capacity matures — risks an outcome where defeating the insurgency is no longer possible,” McChrystal wrote in his assessment, which was sent to US defence secretary Robert Gates at the end of August.

The document is now being reviewed by US president Barack Obama and his national security team.

Obama said last week that he will not decide whether to send more US troops until he has “absolute clarity about what the strategy is going to be.”

McChrystal said president Hamid Karzai’s government was riddled with graft and civilians were alienated by the tactics used by the international forces and by the widespread government corruption and abuse of power.

Al-Qaeda and other extremist movements “based in Pakistan channel foreign fighters, suicide bombers and technical assistance into Afghanistan, and offer ideological motivation, training, and financial support,” he said.

A powerful suicide blast in Afghanistan’s capital Kabul last Thursday killed six Italian soldiers and 10 Afghan civilians, and injured four Italian soldiers and dozens of civilians.

The Taliban claimed the bombing, and an unnamed commander linked to Pashtun warlord and military leader Sirajuddin Haqqani’s militant network based in the northestern Pakistani tribal area of North Waziristan said Haqqani had planned the attack

The attack prompted calls for Italy to withdraw its almost 3,000 troops and Italy’s prime minister Silvio has said Italy needed a ‘transition’ strategy in which local soldiers would assume greater responsibility for the nation’s security.

There are currently some 100,000 soldiers from 40 countries serving in Afghanistan, including 63,000 US troops.

McChrystal has proposed speeding the growth of Afghan security forces to expand the army from 92,000 to 134,000 by October 2010.

He wants the Afghan army to reach 240,000 and the police to 160,000 making a total security force of 400,000.

           — Hat tip: C. Cantoni [Return to headlines]



Islamists in Pakistan Recruit Entire Families From Europe

A German Jihad Colony

By Yassin Musharbash and Holger Stark

The German government is trying to secure the release of a group of suspected German Islamists who were arrested by Pakistani authorities while making their way to a jihadist colony in the Waziristan region along the Afghan-Pakistani border. Entire families from Germany are moving to the region to join the jihad.

The young speaker, who calls himself “Abu Adam,” praises the stay in the mountains — almost as if he were shooting an ad for a family holiday camp. “Doesn’t it appeal to you? We warmly invite you to join us!” Abu Adam says, raising his index finger. He lists all the things this earthly paradise has to offer: hospitals, doctors, pharmacies as well as a daycare center and school — all, of course, “a long way from the front.” After all, they don’t want the children to be woken up by the roar of guns.

The latest recruitment video from the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) is a half-hour in length and is addressed to our “beloved” brothers and sisters back in Germany. The video is presented by, among others, Mounir Chouka, alias “Abu Adam,” who grew up in the western German city of Bonn.

The video shows shacks erected against a backdrop of lush greenery and craggy rock formations. Women wearing blue burqas are seen surrounded by their children. One small girl is holding an artillery gun.

Welcome to the wild world of Waziristan, the region along the Afghan-Pakistani border controlled by Pashtun tribes, al-Qaida and other splinter groups which has become a regular target of US drones and their remote-controlled missiles.

Islamists Recruiting Entire Families

The ad for Waziristan appears to be finding fertile ground in Germany. Security officials here believe the IMU is currently the largest and most active Islamic group recruiting in the country. But there’s an unusual development here, too — militants don’t normally recruit women and children as the IMU appears to be doing. The families move to mujahedeen villages in the rough terrain which are used as bases for supporting the battle against the US troops and the Afghan army.

The German government in Berlin is also examining the propaganda offensive. For several weeks, diplomats in the German Foreign Ministry have been negotiating with Islamabad over the fate of a group of suspected Islamists from Germany’s Rhineland region who have been held in custody in Pakistan for several months now. The group includes a young Tunisian and six Germans, including Andreas M. of Bonn, a Muslim convert, and his Eritrean wife Kerya.

A Child in Custody

The case is being viewed with concern by the federal government. The married couple’s four-year-old daugher has been held in custody together with her parents since May and has suffered particularly in the tough conditions. Germany’s Foreign Ministry has made several attempts to negotiate a swift return to Germany for the mother and her daughter at least, but Pakistani authorities have so far refused.

The travelers, who apparently met each other in a Bonn prayer room, left Germany in several small groups in March and April. They traveled through Turkey to the Iranian city of Zahedan. Located close to the border with Pakistan, Zahedan is notorious for its jihad tourism — hotels even set aside entire room allotments for radical foreigners making their way to the city.

From Zahedan, most take taxis to Pakistan. For the group of Germans, though, that’s where the problems started. After crossing the border, the Germans were captured by police and taken to a jail in Peshawar. The prisoners claim they were handled roughly by Pakistani officials. When German consular officials finally got access to the prisoners, several of the men claimed, in mutually corroborating statements, that they had been beaten.

Initially, the detainees claimed they were from Turkey and had lost their identification papers — leaving authorities with little information to start with. In August, however, the Pakistani ISI intelligence service got involved in the case, moving the prisoners to Islamabad and confirming to the German government that the detainees were Germans. During the first visit by a consular employee from the German Embassy, two of the group’s members, identified as Azzedine A. and Bilal Ü., openly admitted that they had wanted to join “the jihad.”

Security officials believe that the goal of Mounir Chouka and the IMU was to strengthen the German “colony” in Waziristan. The detainees also include Chouka’s brother-in-law, the German-Libyan Ahmed K.

Release Could Be Imminent

Ahmed K.’s arrest is now creating problems for the center-left Social Democratic Party back in Bad Breisig, the German town where he resides. Ahmed K. works as a market analyst at a consulting firm that specializes in the Middle East. The company’s boss, Arnold Joosten, also happens to be the head of the local SPD chapter in Bad Breisig. Joosten has appealed to the federal government to do all it can to secure the group’s release from jail. “I hope that Ahmed will come home soon,” says Ahmed K.’s father Mohamed.

It appears that hope might soon come true. The Pakistani government has signalled that it might not prosecute the group for entering the country illegally or for supporting a terrorist organization and instead put the Germans on a plane back to Frankfurt.

But one of the travelers won’t be part of the group if that happens: Atnan J., a Tunisian from the western state of North Rhine-Westphalia. In a development similar to that of Murat Kurnaz, a Turkish citizen raised in Germany who was wrongly imprisoned by the United States at Guantanamo, the German Interior Ministry wants to prevent Atnan J. from returning to Germany because his residence permit has expired. Officials in Berlin have asked Islamabad to deport the man to Tunisia.

           — Hat tip: TB [Return to headlines]



Italy: Leaders Divided Over Afghan Troop Numbers on Day of Mourning

Rome, 21 Sept. (AKI) — As Italy held a day of mourning on Monday for the six soldiers killed in a bomb attack in Afghanistan last week, key leaders clashed over whether the country’s troops should continue to back NATO forces in the country. Foreign minister Franco Frattini said Italy would continue to support NATO’s strategy in Afghanistan, but the government’s key ally,Umberto Bossi, demanded the troops be brought home.

“The G8 countries will continue to support the UN’s and NATO’s strategy in Afghanistan,” said Frattini in an interview with Italian daily Il Mattino, before leaving for the UN general assembly meeting due to take place on Wednesday in New York.

“Our second objective will be the most important one: How to win the hearts and the minds of the Afghans, and show with visible acts, that coalition forces are there for the well-being of Afghanistan, and not to occupy it like the terrorists say,” he said.

Frattini’s remarks were published as the country’s leaders attended a state funeral for the six Italian soldiers in Rome, a day after their bodies were flown to the capital.

President Georgio Napolitano, prime minister Silvio Berlusconi and members of the armed forces attended the ceremony with the victims’ families at Rome’s Saint Paul Outside the Walls Church.

Thousands applauded outside the church, as comrades of the victims carried their coffins to and from the service.

Four soldiers injured in the attack also attended the service.

In a message of condolence read during the ceremony, Pope Benedict XVI said he was “deeply saddened” by the attack, and prayed for God’s support for “those who work every day to build solidarity, reconciliation and peace”.

Later, Berlusconi’s key ally and coalition partner, Umberto Bossi, from the anti-immigrant Northern League party, clashed with Frattini and insisted on a withdrawal of Italian troops from Afghanistan.

He made the remarks after the funeral of the soldiers.

“There are small and big things, but it would be a tiny step to bring at least a few (soldiers) home for Christmas. It is a wish, a hope,” said Bossi on Monday.

Bossi also said that withdrawal from Afghanistan was not just an American, but an international problem and thus “we would have to ask Berlusconi, who is in between us and America”.

Italy’s defence minister Ignazio La Russa rejected Bossi’s call, saying Italian soldiers were there to keep war and terrorism away from “our home.”

Elsewhere, Italy’s education minister Mariastella Gelmini said she was disappointed when certain schools refused to observe a minute of silence, according to the minister “for political reasons”.

“It is really sad to learn that some schools decided not to observe the minute of silence in memory of the soldiers who died in Afghanistan,” said Gelmini who also apologised to the families of the soldiers.

The soldiers died when a suicide bomber positioned his car between two armoured vehicles in which the soldiers were travelling. One of the armoured vehicles was completely destroyed in the attack for which the Taliban claimed responsibility.

All those killed were from Italy’s 186th Lightning Brigade.The blast also killed 10 Afghans and injured four Italian soldiers as well as dozens of Afghan civilians.

           — Hat tip: C. Cantoni [Return to headlines]



Wounded Soldier Filmed Bomb Attack

Corporal Buono used his mobile phone to film firefight that followed car bombing

KABUL — Let’s try to imagine the scene, in all its crude violence, as described by someone who has spoken to the casualties. When the bomb went off, the body of machine-gunner Corporal Giandomenico Pistonami fell back into the second of the two Italian Linces, splattering the rest of the occupants with blood. One of those inside was airman Corporal Ferdinando Buono, whom the Folgore paratroopers had gone to the airport to collect and then take to the ISAF headquarters in the centre of Kabul. Obviously, Buono was in shock. He knew all about the dangers of Afghanistan but having only just arrived from Italy, he was not ready to tackle a war situation at such close quarters quite so soon. Although they were wounded, the three surviving paratroopers strove to defend him as best they could and pushed him under the armoured vehicle. The sequence of events is confirmed by Afghan civilian witnesses. “It was odd. We saw the Italians pushing the legs of one of the group to get him under the armoured vehicle. He could have been wounded, or perhaps they wanted to pull him out. There was a lot of smoke and shooting. You couldn’t get close”, at least five eye witnesses told the Corriere two days ago. Why were they trying to push a wounded man under the damaged Lince? The attack was over. In those circumstances, the usual procedure is to give the survivors some air, remove their helmets and get them out of their heavy body armour. There’s no point in squeezing them into a cramped space. “But there is a point if the survivors are under attack”, ISAF-NATO sources involved in the inquiry told the Corriere later.

Now we have proof that the Italians came under fire from automatic weapons after the car bomb went off. From his vantage point under the vehicle, Corporal Buono had the presence of mind to film the scene for a few minutes with his camera phone. The film provides conclusive proof of the attack. The images may be confused and out of focus but they are indisputable, and accompanied by a dramatic commentary. You can hear the attackers firing, one shot at a time almost rhythmically, for two or three minutes, followed by bursts from the Italians”. The Italians’ shouts can easily be made out. “My hand’s open, my hand’s open”, screams one voice. Then: “They’re shooting at us. They’re shooting at us. Get down, down, to the right. Shits!” The pictures show an Afghan ambulance arriving about a minute later. It picks up some civilians and leaves again immediately. You can also make out one of the Italian wounded, Corporal Sergio Agostinelli, who dashes across to the smoking wreckage of the first Lince, where there were no survivors, to remove the secret communication codes. He is carrying out orders: The codes must not be allowed to fall into enemy hands. But Agostinelli comes straight back to his companions. The other vehicle is in flames. Everything inside is burning.

“A heroic action. We’re thinking of putting him forward for a gold medal for military valour”, say senior officers at Camp Invicta. The commander of the ambushed unit, Lieutenant Claudio Scampeddu, confirms this version: “Yes, I spoke to the wounded men before they left for Italy. They said they had come under fire and mentioned a video, which I haven’t seen, though”. It also appears that the cameras on the kite balloon that the Americans fly permanently over Kabul to monitor the territory filmed at least two of the possible attackers as they fled on foot across some low hills. European diplomats in Kabul are non-committal. “None of the Afghans who were on the spot confirm the machine-gun attack. It is only known that the Italians opened fire. The confused and frightened soldiers may have mistaken the ammunition in the vehicles exploding for enemy fire”, maintains one ambassador. For the time being, none of the ROS special operations Carabinieri officers who have arrived in Kabul for the inquiry have declined to release statements about the incident.

Lorenzo Cremonesi

21 settembre 2009

English translation by Giles Watson

www.watson.it

           — Hat tip: C. Cantoni [Return to headlines]

Sub-Saharan Africa


Scores Die in South Sudan Attack

Militiamen have killed more than 100 people in an attack in southern Sudan in the latest in a series of ethnic clashes, the military says.

UN sources said thousands of armed men from the Lou Nuer ethnic group attacked civilians and security forces in the village of Duk Padiet in Jonglei state.

Last month about 185 Lou Nuers were killed by ethnic Murle fighters in an attack in the same state.

Some 2,000 people have died in similar clashes across the south this year.

Initial reports of Sunday’s attack on the village had a much lower death toll.

Major General Kuol Diem Kuol told the BBC a nearby company from the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) had been able to retake the village.

He said the attackers had targeted the military and that 22 of the dead were soldiers, including the major commanding the unit.

“This is not a raid for cattle but a militia attack against security forces,” he said.

The United Nations mission in Sudan said it was aware of the incident, but did not have full details about it yet.

Under a 2005 peace deal ending a two-decade war between north and south, former southern rebels formed a power-sharing government with President Omar al-Bashir’s party in Khartoum.

A national election is due next year and southern Sudanese are meant to vote in a referendum to decide whether to secede from the north in 2011.

The BBC’s Peter Martell, in the southern Sudanese capital Juba, says many people fear Khartoum is orchestrating the violence.

Some southern politicians believe Khartoum is arming militias from both sides in a bid to destabilise the region and delay the votes indefinitely.

But the south is made up of a patchwork of rival ethnic groups who have long fought over grazing land, cattle and other resources.

And Khartoum vehemently denies playing any part in the violence in the south.

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]

Latin America


Zelaya Back in Honduras

According to Noticias 24 reports that deposed president Mel Zelaya is back in Honduras, staying at the Brazilian Embassy in Tegucigalpa.

CNN reports that State Department spokesman Ian Kelly confirmed the news,

U.S. State Department spokesman Ian Kelly confirmed Zelaya was in Honduras, but could provide no further information.

“We have confirmed that he is in Honduras,” Kelly told journalists, adding the State Department was trying to find out more details of Zelaya’s whereabouts.

Enrique Reina, the Honduran ambassador to the United States, told CNN en Español that he could not divulge exactly where Zelaya was for security reasons.

Rodolfo Pastor, the charge d’affairs of the Honduran Embassy in Washington, said Zelaya was at the United Nations offices in the Honduran capital, Tegucigalpa.

But Rebeca Arias, coordinator for the United Nations in Tegucigalpa, denied the leader was in the building.

“He’s not here,” she said, adding that Zelaya had called her late Monday morning and told her that he was in the country and would inform her within a few hours where he was.

As you can read in the Noticias 24 report, however, the Brazilian Embassy has confirmed that he is there.

Honduras’s Zelaya Says He’s Returned to Tegucigalpa

“I’m here in the Honduran capital, in the first place carrying out the people’s will, which has insisted on my restoration,” Zelaya said in a separate broadcast on Venezuela’s government-owned Telesur network. “I’m here to initiate a dialogue.”

He’s there, confirmed by the State Department, alright.

           — Hat tip: Fausta [Return to headlines]

Immigration


Australia: Boatload Stretches Border Protection

AN uncrewed vessel crammed with 54 people intercepted off the West Australian coast at the weekend has raised new concerns about the number of asylum-seekers attempting the treacherous journey to Australia’s shores.

Over the past fortnight, Australia’s border protection authorities have intercepted six boatloads of asylum-seekers, adding to logistical pressures on Christmas Island’s detention facilities and political pressures on the Rudd government.

Details of the latest vessel, which was found adrift in international waters on Saturday afternoon, were released yesterday. The 54 people, including one child, were without food and water when first sighted by Border Protection Command P-3 Orion aircraft about 550 nautical miles (1018km) north of the Cocos (Keeling) Islands.

The group, whose nationalities were not disclosed, asked for refuge in Australia and last night were en route to Christmas Island for security, identity and health checks.

Their rescue prompted the opposition to again accuse the government of going soft on border protection.

But Home Affairs Minister Brendan O’Connor yesterday pointed to Canberra’s $654 million strategy to combat people-smuggling as proof it was taking the problem seriously.

“The Australian government is pleased that the group is safe, but it is only through Border Protection Command’s and the Australian Maritime Safety Authority’s vigilance that these people escaped greater harm,” he said.

However, he said that the illegal voyages were “extremely dangerous”.

“Drownings at sea are not uncommon,” he said.

And while the new arrivals are stretching the resources of the facilities on Christmas Island, the island’s nearest Australian neighbours, the Cocos Malays of Home Island, will soon be working at the Howard government’s Immigration Detention Centre under a plan by community leaders to reduce chronic unemployment on their tiny homeland.

Serco, the contractor that will take over the operation of Christmas Island’s Immigration Detention Centre from G4S next month, intends to hire Cocos Malays to work in administration, social care and client services.

Their roles could include helping asylum-seekers prepare food or attend a variety of classes, a Serco spokeswoman said.

Prior to the latest arrival, there were about 700 asylum-seekers and an immigration-related workforce of about 300 on Christmas Island to process them. But the vast majority of the Immigration workers are residents of the mainland who fly in and out of Christmas Island on a roster from as far away as Queensland.

Serco wants to increase its local workforce and start employing Cocos Malays, who live just a 90-minute flight away on the Australian territory of the Cocos (Keeling) Islands.

“(Last month) we travelled across to the Cocos Islands where we met with leaders from the Cocos Malay community, shire, town council and the imam to discuss employment at the Immigration Detention Centre,” a spokeswoman said.

She said talks would resume this week, after Ramadan ended.

Unemployment among Home Island’s population of about 450 Cocos Malays is estimated to be as high as 65 per cent, and next week a joint parliamentary committee will visit the island for hearings as part of its inquiry into the territories’ economic future.

Tensions built on Cocos this year when the shire banned its Cocos Malay workforce from speaking their native language, and furious public meetings were held amid claims the workforce of the shire and the co-operative had been underpaid.

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]



Frontex ‘Involved’ In Return of Migrants

EU border agency denies claims by Human Rights Watch; Malta also said to have sent migrants back to Libya.

The EU’s border agency, Frontex, has been involved in a number of controversial operations in which migrants have been sent back to Libya, Human Rights Watch said today.

A report by the monitoring group specifically documents an operation on 18 June that resulted in the Italian coastguard intercepting a boat with 75 migrants just off the Italian island of Lampedusa and handing the migrants over to a Libyan patrol boat.

Human Rights Watch says that the Italian coastguard intercepted the boat with the help of a German helicopter operating under instructions from Frontex.

Frontex has “categorically” denied being involved in what it called “diversion activities to Libya” and said that the German helicopter reportedly involved in the Italian interception was taking part in an unrelated Frontex operation in another area of the Mediterranean.

It added that “in general” the role of helicopters “in operations co-ordinated by the agency is only to patrol the operational area, not to divert”.

The Human Rights Watch report also documents one case in which Malta intercepted a boat of migrants and handed it over to Libya.

Only Italy has previously been accused of adopting a policy of forcible return.

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has condemned Italy’s ‘push-back’ policy and has produced evidence that asylum-seekers eligible for international protection have been among those returned to Libya.

Speaking today in Brussels at a meeting with EU justice ministers, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, António Guterres, reiterated his “strong reservations” about sending migrants back to Libya.

Libya has provided “no space for bona fide asylum-seekers to exist”, he said.

Human Rights Watch’s own report describes the detention centres that Libya is using to house migrants picked up in the Mediterranean as “overcrowded and dirty”, with “inadequate” and “virtually non-existent” health care. In addition, “there is almost no communication with the authorities and it is hopeless even to contemplate challenging one’s detention in court,” it found.

Jacques Barrot, the European commissioner for justice, freedom and security, would not comment on the allegations of Frontex involvement, limiting himself to saying that the EU is working with the UNHCR to resolve asylum issues.

Barrot wrote to Italy in July asking for information on the push-back operations. Italy has three months in which to report.

The Human Rights Watch report quotes Frontex vice-director, Gil Arias-Fernández, as saying that, in statistical terms, the push-back policy has had “a positive impact” because “fewer lives have been put at risk, due to fewer departures”. He is also quoted as saying that Frontex “does not have the ability to confirm if the right to request asylum as well as other human rights are being respected in Libya.”

           — Hat tip: Sean O’Brian [Return to headlines]



Obama’s Public Health Option and Amnesty

Illegal Migrants and the Aztlan Movement

Settle in for a long read… There is NO way to do this topic justice in a column length article. But there is NO more important topic to cover today!

South Carolina Representative Joe Wilson became Democrats’ public enemy #1 when he recently shouted out “YOU LIE!” at Mr. Obama during his internationally televised special address to a joint session of congress. Joe Wilson was the ONLY individual in that joint session who was telling the truth that day!

Obama was indeed lying, as he has been consistently since the moment he arrived on the political scene.

Joe Wilson was the ONLY individual in both houses of congress with the guts to say so. He has since been reprimanded by his fellow members of the House, and the Obama lies have been buried with rushed alterations to the public health bill which will indeed offer free (taxpayer funded) health care to illegal immigrants. But that’s just the beginning of the story!

[…]

The United States faces three very formidable enemies today, all of which are represented by the new US administration.

  • Extreme Islam
  • The Aztlan Movement
  • International Secular Socialism

All three of these enemies are moving as one within the new administration. All three movements are anti-US, anti-imperialist and anti-capitalist movements.

           — Hat tip: JD [Return to headlines]

General


Andrew Bostom: Apostasy and the Islamic Nations

The 1990 Cairo Declaration, or so-called “Universal Declaration of Human Rights in Islam”, was drafted and subsequently ratified by all the Muslim member nations of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC). Now a 57 state collective which includes every Islamic nation on earth, the OIC, currently headed by Turkey’s Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, thus represents the entire Muslim umma (or global community of individual Muslims), and is the largest single voting bloc in the United Nations…

           — Hat tip: CSP [Return to headlines]



Carolyn Glick: Our Iredeemable International System

Bush’s eventual surrender to the establishment set the course for what under President Barack Obama has become a cornerstone of US foreign policy. Unlike Bush, Obama has enthusiastically embraced the notion that the UN should by rights have a leading role in international affairs. He has also accepted the UN’s basic notion that in the interest of world peace, the US and its democratic allies should bow to the desires of despots and dictators.

So it is that this week he abandoned US allies Poland and the Czech Republic in his bid to appease Russia. So it is that his administration has sided with ousted Honduran president Manuel Zelaya, who, with the support of Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez, sought to undermine Honduran democracy, against Honduras’s lawful government and democratic defenders. So it is that the administration has sided with the genocidal mullahs in Teheran over their democratic opponents. So it is that the administration has adopted the view that Israel is to blame for the absence of peace in the Middle East and embraced as legitimate political actors Palestinian terror groups that refuse to accept Israel’s right to exist.

Until Obama came along, Israel could afford not to make too much of the fact that its enemies control the UN-led system of international institutions, because it could trust that the US would use its Security Council veto to prevent these forces from causing it any real harm. This is no longer the case. With the Obama administration fully on board the UN agenda, Israel and other threatened democracies like Honduras, Poland, the Czech Republic, South Korea and Japan will have to loudly proclaim the UN-based international system’s inherent moral, political and legal corruption and seek ways to undermine and weaken its power.

           — Hat tip: Fjordman [Return to headlines]

Can’t See the Rainforest for the Trees

Niagara Falls 1I posted a few days ago about a recent action at Niagara Falls by the Rainforest Action Network. Last Tuesday the group pulled off a spectacular guerilla stunt — unfurling a huge banner from the catwalk of the visitors’ observation deck — in an attempt to embarrass the Canadian prime minister and draw negative attention to the extraction of oil from oil sands, also known as “tar sands”.

Our Flemish correspondent VH is an adept when it comes to investigating the overlapping networks of the socialist Left and the radical environmental movement. The big question about the “tar sands” controversy is whether Saudi money helps fund the opposition, since Middle Eastern oil producers stand to come under competitive pressure if production from oil sands takes off.

VH has done a little digging to produce the follow-up report below.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *


Can’t See the Rainforest for the Trees
by VH

The Rainforest Action Network (RAN) has for a long time been a regular participant in the World Social Forum (WSF), which each year attracts some 100,000 militant socialists.

RAN poster


The WSF is an offspring of the anti-NAFTA radical Left’s involvement with the Mexican guerilla group EZLN (known as “Zapatistas”, with ties to FARC), which in 1999 declared the Fourth World War against “neoliberalism” (i.e. the Western democracies and free market economy). A number of NGOs, including Oxfam and Unicef, and the French revolutionary Socialist ATTAC!, together with the EZLN founded the WSF.

One offshoot of this WSF, in addition to regional chapters such as the USF [USA] and ESF [Europe], is the People’s Global Action (PGA), Global Day of Action, or Direct Action. All the riots at the WTO and Economic forums (“Davos”) and the G8 — starting with Seattle — find their roots in this PGA (for the full list, see here). Not only was the WSF involved in the Greek riots in late 2008, but it also called for global action against Israel in December 2008, shortly after the operation “Cast Lead” began.

A “tar sands” campaign is run by the “Indigenous Environmental Network” out of the USA and Canada: “…building alliances among Indigenous communities, tribes, inter-tribal and Indigenous organizations, people-of-color/ethnic organizations, faith-based and women groups, youth, labor, environmental organizations and others.” Their issues include, among other things: “De-colonization and symptoms of internalized oppression/racism/tribalism.” This organization is also linked to the World Social Forum (WSF), and it works with and is trained by the Rainforest Action Network (RAN).

RAN logo


A background article by Scott Thompson on this WSF-PGA can be read here.

The WSF is funded by major NGOs such as Oxfam, and foundations such as the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Ford Foundation (which also fund RAN), and increasingly by the up-and-coming South American socialist dictatorships, notably Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela. Chavez in his turn is a close ally of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

RAN, crime, and the Greenpeace link in the board

In its 1999-2000 annual report RAN said it “works hard to combine sophisticated strategies with radical demands.” A recent San Francisco Chronicle article noted that RAN’s “activists wear their arrest records like badges of honor.” [David Hogberg, CRC, May 2005]
– – – – – – – –
The Green Tracking Library writes that RAN — which has tax-exempt status — is “a social shakedown group, harassing companies until they cave in to RAN demands for payoffs to related groups, thus avoiding charges of blackmail if they were to demand funds for themselves in return for stopping unlawful actions [The ‘Eco Mafia’ — translator]. They have 150 allied groups, some performing unlawful acts such as trespassing and theft of goods, according to Rainforest Action Network plans and advisories.” Michael Brune, one of the RAN’s twelve Executive Directors, received $95,417 “compensation” for the job done, and prior to this he ran the San Francisco office for Greenpeace.

RAN, in addition to receiving funding from several foundations, is also indirectly funded by associated activist groups like the Earth Island Institute (which in its turn is indirectly funded by Theresa Heinz Kerry; more later).

RAN enlists children as pawns in its anti-corporate campaigns. In order to do that, it makes use of teacher-moles to recruit children as activists “and exploit them as Fundraisers for the rainforest” (David Hogberg, CRC, May 2005). Greenpeace also abuses children for their own purposes: “Angry child soldier of Greenpeace” [a really sickening video, taken from De Groene Rekenkamer].

Many links point to a few people who seem important for their Muslim/Arab contacts. They also seem to be the people making headlines these days.

RAN Link 01: WSF, STORM, pro-Arab, Black Panthers/NoI, adviser to Obama

[Anthony] Van Jones, the former White House environmental adviser, “a self-avowed communist”, and a committed Marxist-Leninist-Maoist, is also a national environmentalists frontman, and served on the board of Rainforest Action Network (RAN).

Van Jones, a 9-11 skeptic (“The bombs the government drops in Iraq are the bombs that blew up in New York City”) who served on the boards of the National Apollo Alliance, Social Ventures Network, Bioneers, and Julia Butterfly Hill’s “Circle of Life” organization, was arrested during the L.A. riots, and spent a short time in jail: “I met all these young radical people of color. I mean really radical: communists and anarchists. And it was, like, ‘This is what I need to be a part of.’”

Jones co-founded Color of Change (COC), an organization that views the United States as a profoundly racist country, and helped establish Bay Area PoliceWatch, which specialized in demonizing the local police. He co-founded and until recently represented the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights (which in 2009 received more than $1 million from George Soros’s “Open Society Institute”).

He is a prominent founder of the (Marxist-Maoist) “Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement“ (STORM): “Oppose racist, anti-Arab bigotry. We expressed solidarity and support for Arabs and Arab-Americans, already under attack from the media and government,” he wrote, “Stereotypes and scapegoating will not lead us out of this crisis. Solidarity and compassion will.”[p.48]

According to Discover the Networks, Jones’ new approach was modeled on the tactics outlined by the famed radical organizer Saul Alinsky, who stressed the need for revolutionaries to mask the extremism of their objectives and to present themselves as moderates until they could gain some control over the machinery of political power.

Van Jones et al wrote in 2001: “On the morning of September 11, STORM convened in Oakland for an emergency meeting. We knew that the fall of the World Trade Center would mark a dramatic shift in international and domestic politics. We knew that the Left had to respond strongly.” […] Anti-Arab hostility is already reaching a fever pitch as pundits and common people alike rush to judgment that an Arab group is responsible for this tragedy.” The vigil in solidarity with Arab- and Muslim-Americans was held in October in Snow Park. “STORM members articulated a strong anti-imperialist line that resonated with the everyday people there,” said Van Jones [ see also STORM, p.47]

At a press conference at the Masjid Dar El-Salam Mosque in San Francisco in 2004, Van Jones (et al) demanded the resignation of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, for “illegal behavior”.

He voluntarily resigned early this month from his assignment at the White House, because he got in the way of “Obama regaining his footing in the contentious health care debate”. “Apparently,” Don Surber wrote on his blog, “it is OK with the White House that Van Jones is a supporter of Mumia Abu-Jamal [Wesley Cook, Muslim convert and Black Panther Lieutenant, a pan-African nationalist and militant activist: the actions were organized by People of Color Task Force, POCTF, a subdivision of STORM], who had killed [executed] a police officer [Daniel J. Faulkner ] in 1981. […]”

Note: Van Jones’ job was to set up Green Jobs initiatives. Research by the renowned Dutch Groene Rekenkamer, shows not only that every “green job” costs between 571,138 and one million euros in taxpayer subsidies, but also that every green job destroys 2.2 regular (non-subsidized) jobs in other sectors of the economy.

RAN Link 02: WSF (Chavez), Iraq, Iran (Ahmadinejad), Obama fundraiser

Jodie Evans of “Code Pink” is a radical activist and Democratic fundraiser (good for at least $50,000 in donations for Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign) and on the Board of Directors for the Rainforest Action Network (RAN).

Jodie Evans met with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in September 2008 (“It’s rare for a head of state to take time during an official U.N. visit to meet with the peace community”), and said that year that “Al Qaeda may have had a point on 9/11”. Together with Cindy Sheehan she went on a trip to Iraq in 2006 (with an introductory letter from — far left — Rep. Henry Waxman, D-CA, who in 2008 became chairman of the powerful Energy and Commerce Committee — the choice of Speaker Nancy Pelosi), sponsored by — among others — the terrorist leader Saleh al-Mutlaq[1]. Evans later admitted: “We were trying to undermine the war effort!”. A few years earlier, in December 2004, Evans and Code Pink delivered $600,000 to “the other side” [i.e. the insurgents] in Fallujah, writes FrontPage, “And now she sees her savior in Barack — and Michelle — Obama.”

([1] Memri 2007 Saleh al-Mutlaq: “It Is in Iraq’s Interest to Support the Mojahedin-e Khalq Organization”)

Jodie Evans — also called “Obama’s Jane Fonda” — met Hugo Chavez in January 2006 during the revolutionary-militant socialists’ World Social Forum, where, as is customary at WSF jamborees, Chavez gave his “Socialism or Death” speech (Chavez also sponsors the WSF): “He was a doll. […] I was fascinated to learn what a well educated environmentalist he is.”

What’s more, Evans is involved in Global Exchange (which was associated with the anti-Rumsfeld campaign), an offspring of Code Pink that organized “educational tours” to Cuba (which has an “internationally lauded health care system”), as well as Iran, in order to “demystify and contextualize the negative images of Iran,” and “Learn about Islam as practiced in Iran — visit beautiful mosques decorated with intricate and colorful mosaic designs.”

RAN Link 03: Earth First, Greenpeace, Ruckus Society, Theresa Kerry Heinz … and back to RAN

Mike Roselle is an activist and co-founder of Rain Forest Action (RAN), and was arrested in April 2009 during an action against “climate hypocrisy”. He is also co-founder of the [domestic] terror group Earth First!, and together with Howard Cannon of Greenpeace founded the Ruckus Society (direct action training camps, including vegetarian meals: they seek abolition of Western style governments and large business enterprises, and are now “turning up the heat on demanding universal (single payer) healthcare”). He also founded Climate Ground Zero.

In 2006 Senator Obama was the “highlight” at a Campus Progress plenary, opened by Adrienne Marie-Brown of the Ruckus Society. Senator Obama: “It’s easy to just take that diploma, forget about all this progressive politics stuff, and go chasing after the big house and the large salary and the nice suits and all the other things that our money culture says you should buy,” he said there, “But I hope you don’t. Focusing your life solely on making a buck shows a poverty of ambition. It asks too little of yourself, and it will leave you unfulfilled.”

This Ruckus Society, sponsored by Theresa Kerry Heinz, tried to disrupt the Republican convention in 2004 with blockades, chaos, and interruptions.

Theresa Kerry Heinz also sponsors other radicals, such as the Zapatistas (the WSF-related Zapatista Alliance Pittsburgh and WSF related Pittsburgh Social Forum), and jihadists. Through the The Democratic Justice Fund, funded indirectly by Heinz (Tides Foundation) and Soros, restrictions on Muslim immigration are opposed. Heinz also indirectly (Tides Foundation) funds the Council for American Islamic Relations. Heinz further supports the Earth Island Institute: “We currently serve as the fiscal sponsor for more than 40 groups […]. Successful Earth Island Institute alumni projects include […] Rainforest Action Network […].

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *


In brief: The militant socialist Rainforest Action Network (RAN) obviously has as its main purpose to undermine the Western economy using undemocratic means to enforce a socialist police state. At least that is what it will lead to —the Green Nazis. It has direct and indirect links with all major Eco-Fascist organizations, and itself seems to have penetrated the White House or “big politics”.

RAN’s Arab connections may be external via the Chavez and Ahmedinejad links, and/or domestic and indirect via Muslim organizations and others with links to the Arab world. Its connections extend not only to oil-rich Arab countries, but also to hostile socialist regimes.

Those who would undermine efforts to achieve secure and ever more independent energy sources can best meet their goals by empowering the fifth column of Eco-Fascists.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *


Notes and addenda:

  • The fact that the CO2 emission panic is about moving money away from the developed countries to anywhere else (a fifth-column dream) is nicely illustrated in this nonsense discussion.
  • A final thought, on Saudi Islamic funding:

    The total amount spent by just one Muslim country (admittedly the richest), Saudi Arabia, in furthering the cause of Islam over the past three decades, is close to 100 billion dollars. […] It should not be beyond the wit of the American government to find ways to halt this flow of foreign Muslim money, either by seizure as money that is being used for purposes that naturally tend to increase the threat to national security, or by demanding of the Saudis that they stop that flow — on pain of having all kinds of things happen, beginning of course with exposure and Congressional hearings about this Saudi money, and what it buys, and about all the Western hirelings who, over the years, have done the Saudi bidding.

Nicolas Sarkozy Brings Sharia Finance to France

An interesting post this morning from Tiberge at the Brussels Journal:

Some English-language Arabic news sources have covered this story. It is certainly not new — discussions about Islamic finance have been making headlines in the world of economics for a long time, but the French are inching closer to a definitive measure that will allow Islamic law to enter into the French legal framework. All this is happening with the support of President Sarkozy’s UMP.

The French Senate passed the bill on June 9. It was then that they introduced the amendment on Islamic “sukuk” that was to become the source of the Socialist opposition in the Chamber of Deputies three days ago, when the final vote was taken. Without that amendment it is likely that the Socialist deputies would have voted for the bill.

Here is a report from Le Point, dated September 17, that was probably the source for the English-language articles. It should be noted that this story has been largely ignored by the French MSM. It appears primarily at Le Point, but I could not find anything in Le Figaro (although that may have changed by now) […]

Read the whole article at the Brussels Journal for more details on how sharia-compliant finance has made its way into the heart of the Fifth Republic via the legalization of Islamic bonds, or sukuk.

Ever since 1789 the principle of laïcité, or the secularization of society, has been a paramount feature of French politics. Nicolas Sarkozy and his governing coalition have had to engage in some ingenious evasive maneuvers to portray Islamic finance as a secular institution.
– – – – – – – –
It’s interesting to observe that the Socialists are the main opponents of this project, despite the “unholy alliance” of the Left with the Islamists throughout most of Europe. Also notable is the fact that the Vatican has approved of the introduction of sharia-compliant instruments into Europe’s financial system.

Our betrayal by our leaders has been a complex one, and no single faction within the existing political establishment is free of complicity in the pre-emptive surrender to Islam.

It would also be worthwhile to emphasize the role of zakat — charitable giving as mandated by sharia — in Islamic finance. Zakat is part and parcel of sharia-compliant finance, and the huge amounts of money generated by zakat are one of the principle funding sources for Islamic terrorism all over the world.

The French parliament — and other legislative bodies across the Western world — would do well to remember this fact when considering the introduction of Islamic finance into the existing legal system.



Hat tip: TV.

Firemen Under Siege in Gothenburg

There was a time when nightly “carbecues” were restricted mainly to France, especially the banlieues of Paris. Every morning one could gauge the current level of immigrant rage by news reports giving the number of cars burned by “youths” the previous night.

But nowadays France is not alone. In recent months immigrant suburbs in various parts of Sweden — Malmö, Uppsala, Gothenburg, and now Tensta — have been illuminated at night by scores of burning cars, tires, dumpsters, and buildings. In these areas firefighting has become a dangerous occupation, as “youths” set fires and then ambush emergency workers when they arrive to put them out.

Below is a news report by Norwegian television about the firemen of Gothenburg. Many thanks to Steen for the translation and Vlad Tepes for the subtitling. WARNING: Some of the language in the subtitles is not PG-13:

[Post ends here]

Connecting the Swedish Dots in Pakistan

We’ve reported previously on “Crazy Inga”, a.k.a. Safia Benaouda, and her terrorist comrades who were recently arrested in Pakistan on suspicion of being Al Qaeda conspirators.

Our Swedish correspondent CB has compiled a report with the latest on the “Swedish” terrorists:

There has been a lot of news lately about the terror-Swedes. This gives us interesting insights into how these kinds of networks function and where the connections to the more respectable organizations in society go, not to mention the supporters and those turning a blind eye to it all.

Last Thursday morning on Swedish public radio the husband of Safia Benaouda, Munir Awad, could be heard in an old interview talking about his reasons for going to Somalia in 2007 to experience “a real Muslim country”. He had no idea of why people would think this was anything other than a vacation to a real Muslim country: “We just want to be Muslims. Why is everyone against that?” “We want to see Islam”.

This was at a time when the Islamic courts ruled Somalia and stonings were part of the religious dish of the day. That was the genuine Islam they went to see.

Awad also commended an “American” father of four who went to Somalia for Islam’s sake. What “going there for Islam’s sake” meant Awad never elaborated on, although the reporter asked in a shocked voice, “So you mean that he [the father] choose Islam over his children. Is that being a good father?” The reporter was obviously ignorant about what Islam is, or else she would not have been shocked and would have pressed Awad on his statement that the man was a good father.

In the same program the Islamic scholar Mattias Gardell was interviewed about why these young people travel to different parts of the world to do jihad. Gardell is famous for his book Bin laden I våra hjärtan (Bin Laden in our Hearts), and he is often heard to be ever so understanding of the jihadist leanings of Muslims — although it’s always the tiny minority. To him these three represented “young people with big hearts” having the spirit of “knights”, “wanting to save the world from injustices”. Gardell even compared the jihad-inspired youths with environmentalists struggling to save the planet from destruction, though they don’t use guns. Both are seen to be fighting the technological powers that destroy the world, in Gardell’s view.

Helena Benouda 0


The article below is from noted editorial and blogger Per Gudmundson, of the conservative Svenska Dagbladet. He asks whether it’s just bad judgment for the Benaoudas to end up with the likes of Ghezali, and to defend the now-convicted jihadist Osama Kassir, or if this is a meeting of the like-minded.

Perhaps Helena Benaouda doesn’t like the violent variety of Islamists, but she has in the past defended a Muslim in Sweden who promoted stoning for adultery, and is as good a representative of Swedish Muslims as anybody else.

According to sources on Swedish public radio, Safia Benaouda claims that she and her 2-year-old son were forced by her husband to accompany the group to Pakistan, and as a wife she had to comply. The Pakistani authorities think she might have been brought along to divert suspicions about the group. Apparently, information revealed in the apprehension of Ghezali has lead to several arrests of Islamists in Waziristan an in other places. One would guess that Ghezali will not be held in such a high esteem among Islamists after that.

Ghezali has claimed that he went to Pakistan to participate in a religious meeting with Tablighi Jamaat, but the imam at S:t Eriksplan mosque in Stockholm, who has extensive knowledge about Jamaat, says that Ghezali is unlikely to be an active member of the movement: “If Ghezali had been a very active member in the movement, I think I would have known about it.” Also, the imam describes how pilgrims travel to the area, and emphasizes that Ghezali and company followed an infamous smugglers’ route. Therefore the terror explanation is the more likely one.

Some good news in all this is that neither the Swedish Prime minister nor the Secretary of State seems to be in to big a hurry to come to these poor “victims” rescue. The Secretary of State formulated it in this way: “The former government did an enormous work to free Ghezali. I can’t really see that on the horizon at the moment”. And right he is! Remember, the former government was the Social Democratic government, the same party with ties to the Muslim Council of Sweden, which is headed by Helena Benaouda…

There is plenty here for the conspiracy theorist, but the different dots start to form a picture of bad judgment and unsavory allegiances. There will sooner or later be stronger light on these connections and things will change in Sweden. Whether for better or worse, it remains to be seen.

Here’s CB’s translation of Gudmundson:
– – – – – – – –

Connect the dots

Ghezali, Kassir, Benaouda. How does it all fit together?

One way of viewing it is to think about the environments where different interests can sometimes meet. In today’s SvD I write about one of those occasions where the three above-mentioned surnames were brought together.

Mehdi Ghezali made one of his few appearances on the 4th of July 2006. He gave a speech at a demonstration arranged by the small leftist group Eurocolors, which wanted to “use art as weapons against prejudices”. But the protest wasn’t just about Guantánamo. They also carried placards with portraits of Ousama Kassir, now sentenced to lifetime imprisonment for terror crimes in USA. Among the speakers was the president of the Muslim council of Sweden, Helena Benaouda. She is the mother of Safia Benaouda, who was previously incarcerated in Ethiopia and was recently apprehended with Ghezali in Pakistan.

Other speakers were Yvonne Ruwaida, a board member of Miljöpartiet [the left green party in Sweden], and Eva Björklund, at the time a board member of Vänsterpartiet [the Left Party].

Terrorism has never existed in a vacuum.

An innocent demonstration against Gitmo — yet an example of when judgment yields, or, when apparently differing interests turn out to be mutual. The one who is an opponent of Guantanamo of course isn’t automatically a terror sympathizer. But, those wondering how the Stockholm Benaouda family came into contact with the Örebro Ghezali family need look no further.

Mehdi GhazaliIn SvD’s news section they posed that question the other day. But how did the trio meet? And why did they once again take the risk of traveling to a combat zone?

Judging by the facts, it depends on the hero status that Mehdi Ghezali’s long incarceration at Guantánamo has given him in some quarters. In those contexts the three met, after Ghezali’s return to Sweden in 2004.

I blogged a few years ago about the meeting that introduces my editorial today. The pictures and quotations are from the now closed site Eurocolors, an art and culture association that wanted to “use art as a weapon against prejudice, hate, discrimination, war, racism, extremism, fanaticism, destructiveness, violence, aggression, terrorism, crime, crimes against humanity, destruction and abuse of nature, and cruelty to animals.”

“On the fourth of July, 2006 (on America’s independence day), Eurocolors arranged a protest march against the existence of horrifying jails and the so called ‘Guantanamo-system’… Everyone in the protest march carried orange t-shirts, known as ‘Guantanamo shirts’“

Helena Benaouda“We also carried a picture of the Swedish citizen Usama Kassir whom the USA marked as a terror suspect, without showing evidence against him, simply because it didn’t exist. On those loose grounds the USA demanded his extradition, and by doing so, violated UN declarations, human rights and the Geneva Convention”.

“With us was also Mehdi Ghezali, a former prisoner in Guantanamo, who was able to speak publicly for the first time since he was released two years ago”.

“The following persons spoke outside the embassy: Eva Björklund (the Left party)”

“Helena Benaouda [the Muslim council of Sweden]”

“Yvonne Ruwaida… Gustav Hjertén (Miljöpartiet [the leftist greens])”

Perhaps the pictures show how difficult it is to choose the right company. Let’s hope that. The alternative — that there exist coinciding interests — isn’t good.

And a follow-up from CB:

Safia Benaouda might be released soon!

An update on the terror-three: now it seems that they might be the “terror-two” in the headlines.

According to the Swedish press service TT, a source with knowledge about the Pakistani security apparatus has said that Safia Benaouda isn’t suspected of any terrorism-related activity. That would mean that she and her son might be released in the near future.

As with many of the statements so far, this should be taken with a grain of salt. And it could also be an indication that her husband, who is ten years her senior, was actually the driving force behind her changed values and behavior, at least according to her brother.

At the same time, one has to wonder how naïve this woman can be, after going on the infamous trip to Somalia, with terrorists.

And by that token: how innocent is she really?

I just hope that if she’s released, she will be really ashamed of having put her two-year-old in harm’s way to help her husband and Mehdi Ghezali travel to Pakistan for their nefarious purposes. However, I wouldn’t hold my breath.