George Bush Defeats the IRA

 
From The Brussels Journal (yes, Brussels!), which says it has “all the news that never gets printed,” comes as story about the IRA: Sinn Fein has said it is renouncing terrorism. Yes, you read that correctly. The IRA is laying down its arms and intends to use only peaceful measures to achieve change from now on. Che Guevera, you just lost another one—

     According to this week’s Economist the Sinn Féin statement announcing the end of the IRA’s armed activities was delayed so that it would not “be overshadowed by the new, more violent terror campaign being waged by jihadis on the British mainland.” Were the IRA bombs that killed civilians in pubs and shopping streets less violent than al-Qaeda’s? The only difference, as far as I can see, is that the IRA members did not believe in blowing up themselves in the process. Does that make them less violent than suicide bombers?

That’s a good question. If you blow yourself up along with your victims are you somehow less culpable? I don’t think so. And even if the IRA never did the “I’m-going-and-you’re-all-coming-with-me” routine when they bombed pubs in London, they were trained by the same thugs and criminals who now send out the mentally deranged to kill in the streets of Baghdad and Tel Aviv.

Not should a distinction be made among the various terrorist movements that have plagued our world ever since…well, ever since Algeria and the French were fighting. Just because America woke up on 9/11 doesn’t mean the slaughter wasn’t going on for decades prior to our catastrophe.

     Other commentators, too, tend to make a distinction between the terrorist movements associated with political struggles between population groups within the European states themselves, and the series of terrorist attacks by Islamic groups on Western targets since 9/11. I do not believe that there is a real distinction between “old terrorism” and “new terrorism.” There is only one kind of terrorism and it is always to be abhorred.
Moreover, this “new terrorism” is not new at all. It has been around for decades in the Arab world, and this is not even the first time it has been exported to the West. Some people seem to think that 9/11/2001 meant the beginning of the age of terrorism, but an al-Qaeda related organisation, the Algerian terror group GIA, had already bombed a Parisian underground station in July 1995, killing 7 civilians and wounding 117. This was long before the neocons had any influence in US foreign policy.

So the thugs in the IRA are going straight? Amazing, if true. How do you return from a life of violence? Can it be done? The umbilical cord from the IRA to the Middle East received its life blood from Libya. Perhaps Libya’s new pacificist face has something to do with this new IRA routine?

Whatever the reason, it could portend a dimunition in violence-prone separatist groups in Europe. If so, then we’re on the right track, aren’t we?

Alexandra Colen, the author of the post at The Brussels Journal, closes with a most interesting proposal:

     History has overtaken them and I am glad Gerry Adams has finally realised that their reign of terror is over. If this is the result of George W. Bush refusing to invite him to the White House on St. Patrick’s Day 2005, then this is another victory for the Americans in the fight against terrorism.

Yeah. George did it! He left Gerry Adams to gnash his teeth in the outer darkness last St. Patrick’s Day and we celebrated then.

But who could possibly have imagined the extraordinary consequences of that gesture of integrity?

***************

Hat tip: Barcepundit

A Poem for Women in Islam

I Could Scream: Examining the plight of women under Islam
Ah, the serendipities of Google. Yesterday, while searching for information on Mr. Michael Clarke, one of the featured stars in a previous post, what should pop up but the official website of Iran Radio. Like NPR , except for the real mullahs instead of merely their camp followers.

And on this website was a page for women, a page full of exhortation and an invitation to Islam’s women to join forces. The organization is called Worldwide Islamic Network of Women; the acronym they use is WINOW. Cool, huh? And just like the NOW group here, it’s a page urging the faithful to follow the dogma and the drill, to convert and see the light — their light, anyway. So now you have these two feminist groups, WINOW and NOW —the new Scylla and Charbydis for women.

The author of the following poem, winnowed from this same page, is anonymous. Somehow this piece looks a lot like the negative image of various feminist “poetry” devoted to the liberating joys of abortion. Same dubious aesthetic, too.

Be Proud of Hijab

You look at me and call me oppressed,
Simply because of the way I’m dressed,
You know me not for what’s inside,
You judge the clothing I wear with pride,
My body’s not for your eyes to hold,
You must speak to my mind, not my feminine mold,
I’m an individual, I’m no mans slave,
It’s Allahs pleasure that I only crave,
I have a voice so I will be heard,
For in my heart I carry His word,
“O ye women, wrap close your cloak,
So you won’t be bothered by ignorant folk”,
Man doesn’t tell me to dress this way,
It’s a Law from God that I obey,
Oppressed is something I’m truly NOT,
For liberation is what I’ve got,
It was given to me many years ago,
With the right to prosper, the right to grow,
I can climb moutains or cross the seas,
Expand my mind in all degrees,
For God Himself gave us LIB-ER-TY,
When He sent Islam,
To You and Me!


Here is the exegesis:

You look at me and call me oppressed,
That’s because you are, sweet-pea. Doesn’t require a degree in engineering to recognize fear when I see it hidden.

Simply because of the way I’m dressed,
Who in their right mind would dress that way in the desert heat if they didn’t have to?

You know me not for what’s inside,
No, but I can take a good guess that you wouldn’t dare step outside without that covering. And you don’t know what’s inside anyone who isn’t forced to dress that way either. Your point?

You judge the clothing I wear with pride,
No, it’s more that I judge the misogynists who force a whole culture to see women as so dangerous and men as having so little self-control that women have to wear bags over their heads.

My body’s not for your eyes to hold,
Don’t give yourself airs. No one’s looking that hard.

You must speak to my mind, not my feminine mold,
Ri-i-ight. And if I speak to you without your father’s, your brother’s and your uncle’s permission, you’re dead meat. All because of your “feminine mold.” Tell me, what is a prison of cloth like? Have you ever run through a field barefoot, or laughed out loud in public, or walked somewhere by yourself just to think?

I’m an individual, I’m no mans slave,
If you say so. But how come you have to ask permission to go out, to marry, to talk to someone? Or how do you define “slave”?

It’s Allahs pleasure that I only crave,
Spare me your religiosity. You don’t have to wear blankets and live under someone’s thumb in order to please Allah.

I have a voice so I will be heard,
But you may not use that voice to sing, may you? And no talking to men either. Sure you do. You have a voice. Just keep telling yourself that so your vocal cords don’t atrophy. How many times in your life have you used that voice to say “no” to something you felt was wrong?

For in my heart I carry His word,
So do millions of other women, but they don’t have to muffle up in yards of blankets to carry His word.

“O ye women, wrap close your cloak,
So you won’t be bothered by ignorant folk”,

Yeah. Wrap up and make a spectacle of yourself.

Man doesn’t tell me to dress this way,
And if I believe that you’ve got some property in the Sahara to sell me, right?

It’s a Law from God that I obey,
You keep on believing that. It might make your plight less awful.

Oppressed is something I’m truly NOT,
Of course NOT…you’re the exemplar for freedom, you are.

For liberation is what I’ve got,
In which particular corpuscle do you store all this liberation? And what are you saving it for?

It was given to me many years ago,
Liberty is not ‘given’ – it’s A given, like life and the pursuit of happiness.

With the right to prosper, the right to grow,
Hmmm. You get to do it your way, right? And other women are just beating the door down for the chance to be like you, aren’t they? And you never cry yourself to sleep at night, do you?

I can climb moutains or cross the seas,
As long as you get permission first.

Expand my mind in all degrees,
But how come you can’t sit in the same classroom with those “Others” – the men – while expanding your mind with degrees? How come you all have to sit in separate classrooms down the hall and see the teacher on a monitor?

For God Himself gave us LIB-ER-TY,
He did indeed. And someone stole yours and put this pitiful sham in its place.

When He sent Islam,
This is received opinion to which you are most welcome. I’m just glad the liberty He handed me didn’t include this part of your contract.

To You and Me!
Ummm..I don’t know how to tell you this, dear heart, but it’s yours, not mine. Wear it, with your various and sundry coverings, in good health.

*********************************

This is Persian poetry? Hafiz is rolling over in his grave. And I can feel an attack of the vapors coming on. Pardon me while I go lie down with a cool cloth on my forehead. Oh Lordy, the sentiments expressed here are making me positively vertiginous.

Now wherever did I leave those smelling salts?

The Council Speaks and Moves On

Watcher's CouncilFirst Place in the Watcher’s Council:
Right Wing Nuthouse is an excellent essayist. He combines and synthesizes themes in a way that makes his subjects fresh and interesting. This example includes Clio, Scotty, and Neil Armstrong. And yes, he makes them all fit.

     As we look back and remember both Star Trek and the moon landing, it may be well to also remember the dreams and aspirations of today’s children. What kind of technological future are we going to leave them? Will it be a nightmare future where the very few enjoy the benefits of the best that the human mind can dream? Or will it be a future where, like the world of Star Trek, most can share in the magic and the miracles and the unlimited potential of the human spirit realized through our dreams of what can be accomplished when we are inspired by the better angels of our nature.

It no doubt depends on what we, like those pioneers at NASA, are wiling to sacrifice.

Second place was occupied by Glittering Eye in a thoughtful response to the questions raised by Tancredo’s Option. Here is the Eye as he succinctly outlines the possible American reactions to a nuclear event:

     Jacksonians will demand a nuclear response. Wilsonians and Jeffersonians will maintain a horrified silence. Hamiltonians will worry which will be worse for business, responding or not responding.

In the non-Council winner’s place is a brilliant piece by Hog on Ice. And this is not just your ordinary call for sexual abstinence, this is the real thing, all orifices included:

     Everybody tells me I’m uptight and self-righteous when I say sex outside of marriage is wrong and dangerous, but the facts are on my side. Extramarital sex often has devastating consequences, and the more you screw around, the worse the consequences are for you and the people around you. Disease is just one consequence, but the others are bad, too. Promiscuity leads to divorce, unwanted pregnancies, abortions, and violence. Jails are full of people whose violence can be traced back to jealousy or infidelity.

Required for your kid if he or she is over the age of thirteen. Though for some it may be too late by then.

The Belmont Club’s And Now I Lay Me Down to Sleep placed second. Here’s what he says about the litterati’s attempts to dismiss the idea of “world-wide terrorism”:

     Yet on one limited point the BBC’s producers may be right. There probably isn’t a single controlling terrorist network in the world today; but multiple ones each with their own specific goals who may maintain links with each other, just as the multiple totalitarian movements in the 1930s formed an axis whenever it suited them. But the multiplicity of diseases does not invalidate the notion of disease.

I would say the man is a national treasure but unfortunately he belongs to Australia. Well, at least he went to school here. Amazing to think that Harvard didn’t ruin him. Let us say a small prayer for large miracles. Of which Wretchard is one.

As they say, read the whole thing. And then hit the “donate” button. In fact, it’s a cute little button.

Always, thanks to the Watcher. He da man. Over there you’ll find

  • information on Judge Roberts that you didn’t know,
  • an essay on a teacher who got fired for hanging the President’s picture in her classroom,
  • a tart dismissal of another school district that wants to use gummint funds to feed everybody,
  • and a photo of the London bombers on a rafting trip.
  • There’s also an intensely good review of a book I read last year — thanks to Wallo’s World for bringing it up again
  • and the inimitable Dr. Sanity’s take on Wretchard’s essay.

Did you know she’s moved up to Playful Primate in the Ecosystem? Way to go, Doc!