The latest essay by our Israeli correspondent MC discusses Nationalism and Socialism. Which one is good, and which one is bad? And which one is currently ascendant in this our twilight dystopia?
“Hear nothing that we do not wish you to hear. See nothing that we do not wish you to see. Believe nothing that we do not wish you to believe. Think nothing that we do not wish you to think.”
— Joseph Goebbels (Peikoff p.60)
The Bible tells us that Yah split the people into nations, and that behind the pre-Babel globalism was ‘Nimrod’ the mighty Hunter.
In the Hebrew, Esau was also a ‘mighty hunter’ — literally ‘a man of the field’; it is one of those phrases in ancient Hebrew that is not well understood. Just think how confusing the 1955 Doc Brown found Marty’s use of the word “heavy”…
The Trinity of Nimrod, Semirage and Tammuz was not at all healthy. The tower (of Babel) that they built was obviously designed to withstand a repeat flood, giving Yah the finger as such. The same kind of flood that Yah had used to wipe out a pre-flood mankind that was playing with genetic modification and creating chimera as described in the Book of Enoch., The flood wiped out the Nephilim (Giants), which Nimrod also wanted to reconstruct, post-flood.
Mankind could not be trusted with globalism even then, and this ‘new’ globalism is likely to be similar to what it was under Nimrod, with Satan rubbing his hands in glee.
There is nothing intrinsically wrong with Nationalism, but it does mean that we have to decide whether the problem with the Nazis, the National Socialist German Workers Party. was the Nationalism or the Socialism, or both.
Socialists claim it was the Nationalism that was at fault and have demonized ‘nationalism’, even whilst, in many ways, upholding it. After the war they took the moral high ground, claiming that all wars would be stopped if ‘nationalism’ was eradicated. This is one of the founding memes of the European Union and it is there in the preamble to the Treaty of Rome: the idea of “ever closer union”. Although the EU has a democratic façade, it is ruled by a committee, a “Council of Ministers” which ‘votes’ on items submitted to it by a ‘commission’ which comprises senior civil servants from the member nations under their respective ‘commissioners’ (a sinecure position given to retiring national politicians). There is, in the EU, a democratic deficit which is hidden behind the façade of a powerless European Parliament.
In many ways this European behemoth resembles the Nazi administration posited in its 1942 planning, and when compared with the way the United States tackled the same set of problems with disparate states in a federal (nationalist) setting, one can begin to see the contrasts. The USA, historically, had an amazing ability to recognize problems early and resolve them before they became fatal.
The Nazis sought a homogeneous German culture which excluded ‘non-Aryans’. The EU wants a unified ‘European’ man. The modern “Great Reset” wants to recreate a homogenized feudal culture where enslaved people across the whole world are allowed to exist solely to produce food and goods for the master race.
In the USA, each state has retained its unique character. Why? Because the idea was to keep Federal interference at a minimum, limited by a Constitution to defence and affairs of state via an elected executive. The EU, however, seeks to ‘harmonize’ the various member states via diktats from an unelected body. In the UK we always bought petrol (gas) by the imperial gallon, and butter by the half-pound. That all had to change once we joined the EU, and many small gas stations had to close down rather than buy new gas-pumping equipment calibrated in litres.
Another EU diktat also required that abattoirs have separate entry roads and exit roads. Again, many small local abattoirs had to close down.
Eventually the UK decided to leave the Union, and it seems many other groups across Europe are considering the same. Poland is having its issues, too, finding out that the EU is intolerant of Polish tradition and culture. There is a hidden cost to membership and access to funds: that of conformity and cultural suicide.
Over the top of all this are the ghoul billionaires, injecting cash into a globalist agenda. Soros and Gates were preceded by a hundred years by the multi-millionaire Cecil Rhodes who used his fortune to set up the original infrastructure (The Round Table) for world domination.
An interesting read on Rhodes and his influence is here. Although it contains the real history, it is a propaganda piece where the history is spun in such a way as to create a conspiracy theory.
Any study of the Rhodes circle quickly gets bogged down in conspiracy theories, but in any study of 20th-century history, the associated entities in the diagram above keep cropping up in unclear roles. For example, Neville Chamberlain appeared to think that he had brought Hitler back into the ‘Chatham House’ (Royal Institute) fold with his declaration of “peace in our time”. Chamberlain and Lord Halifax (his deputy) were convinced that Churchill was a dangerous idiot. They knew (or thought they knew) that Hitler too was part of the ‘round table’ brotherhood, and could thus be contained within the current globalist grouping without resorting to actual war. Their vehicle, of course, was the ill-fated League of Nations, which was a formation doomed to failure because of contradicting obsessions, with peace being enforced by the might of the Royal Navy and the French Army, both of which were to be rapidly disarmed.
Once more history rhymes…
There is still a Utopian belief that the eradication of nations and borders will bring about world peace and harmony — the great melting pot.
The other related obsession is faith in the Malthusian concept of ‘overpopulation’. This is the belief that the world would be a better place if useless groups of people were genocided.
But these are not the beliefs of Nationalists; they are the beliefs of Socialists. So of the Nationalism and the Socialism of the Nazis, which one truly defined and reflected their beliefs?
To be a ‘Nationalist’ is to be ‘Far Right’, what does this actually mean? ‘Far Right’ is a meaningless label meant to detract and deter. Socialism has a credibility problem: all too often socialists have resorted to mass murder. Their true history is very, very nasty. Even if one does not believe in Nazi ‘socialism’, one must remember that most of the pioneering work of genocide was done by the Lenin/Trotsky/Stalin cartel who were even more overtly socialist. It has been necessary therefore to create a series of mythologies to divert attention from the totally immoral history of socialism and somehow pin their horrendous crimes on the ‘Nationalists’, and to do this, one must somehow subtract the socialism from National Socialism, whilst at the same time separating the murderous ‘Stalinism’ from peace-loving and benevolent Soviet Socialism.
Unfortunately, and using the Holocaust as a tool, this has been achieved to a very great extent. I never cease to be amazed at the extent of the Holocaust, but then I look at Coronamadness and I see exactly the same things beginning to happen, this time on a worldwide basis, even to the extent of fooling of the very Jews who were the major victims of the first holocaust.
Here in Israel, the identifying of Fauci with Mengele is resented as a form of cultural appropriation, but to me ‘never again’ is much more important. If the cap is appropriate then it should be worn.
When we allow a cultural/ethnic/unvaxxed group to be demonised, we carry on our shoulders the risks associated with promoting Nazism. Do I want to exterminate all Muslims? No, but I would love for Islam to be brought into the 21st century. That Islam mandates that I, an unbeliever (in Mohammed) be exterminated is unacceptable, that they fire explosive rockets at me in the name of Allah and his ‘peaceful Prophet’ is an irony, and that the embedded cognisant dissonance is suppressed to a whisper is despicable, drowned out by irrational yells of ‘Islamophobia’ and “they stole our land,” yet I have a truly rational fear of the Islamic hate for me and my kind. But then he who shouts loudest…
Nationalism, with secure borders and the vetting of would-be immigrants for cultural compatibility, is not problematic unless the country concerned is redistributing wealth: a central tenet of socialism. For the overarching problem of socialism is the financial instability that comes from robbing the productive to pay for the unproductive. Although this sounds noble, it is impractical to the point of being disastrous. In a any nation state, gaining financial stability is a struggle, let alone having to cope with an ever-increasing burden of financially unproductive people, particularly those one might call ‘welfare thieves’, those who are prepared to parasitize a welfare state.
Included in these parasite classes are those ‘intellectuals’ who pontificate on social theories such as equity, race and gender; those who actually inhibit productivity rather than promote it.
We have seen a lot of this in the last two years. We take a mild cold virus that we have lived with for millennia, we ‘tweak’ it and then propagandize it to create a panic. We then offer a toxic ‘vaccine’ as an intervention, one that appears to actually kill more than it cures.
Socialism is an emotional and unscientific response to chronic fear, fear of financial hardship, fear of debilitating illness and a nebulous fear of being ‘exploited’. It is a lack of belief in Creation, and a belief in a series of mythical (theoretical) ‘accidents’ that ostensibly gave rise to life, the universe and everything. Because life is an ‘accident’ we are locked into a perilous and fearsome world and must find shelter — underneath the red flag of socialism…
The people’s flag is deepest red,
It shrouded oft our martyred dead
And ere their limbs grew stiff and cold,
Their hearts’ blood dyed its every fold.
So raise the scarlet standard high,
Beneath its shade we’ll live and die,
Though cowards flinch and traitors sneer,
We’ll keep the red flag flying here.
It sounds nice, but it has never been the people’s flag — its always been the elitists’ flag, and underneath its shade is always some form of slavery.
Nationalism is in many ways a panacea for the fears generated by socialism, the idea of an identity in which one can take comfort, and with which one can co-operate to earn the basic essentials of life — The free exchange of labour, ideas and mutual support based upon a commonly held culture. Under nationalism, whilst I may be flipping burgers to provide my daily bread, I can be studying astrophysics or brain surgery in my spare time, with a view to a better future. If I live in fear, then there is no point to astrophysics — better to learn karate.
There are many comfortably-off African Americans who have become full blown AMERICANS in every way, but there are many others who have no desire to be American when they can feed off the socialist tit, whilst kicking mother ‘liberty’ in the gut.
Many poor arrived on the shores of the USA and found relative wealth and freedom. In a nationalist environment, hard work and prudence usually (but not always) pay benefits, whilst socialism only creates slaves.
The basis of socialism is supposed to be a feeling, perhaps that we should “love our neighbour as ourselves.” But loving your neighbour without loving the Lord your God is fraught with difficulties and frailties. The reality is the desire to want to be seen to love your neighbour, but actually hating his guts. It is primarily the human frailty which always causes socialism to fail, with each person indulging in emotional posturing and ambition rather than stopping to ponder the rest of the parable — “but who is my neighbour?”. The priest and the scribe followed (religious) tradition; the robber was just a criminal; the real neighbour was the despised and rejected Samaritan, the guy who actually stopped and addressed our needs. Priests, scribes and robbers are not our neighbours; Good Samaritans are. Socialists tend to be robbers, those who beat us and leave us for dead, and you might say that the Samaritans are those who clear up the mess after the socialists rob us of everything we have.
What has Brandon done to shut down COVID-19 as he claimed he was going to do? Print vast amounts of currency to cheat us by inflation, each dollar bill printed devalues the dollars we hold from our paychecks and our savings. Reduce gas priced by two cents and claim an economic miracle?
No, just our gullibility stretched out to its limit. I hope those politicians who blocked election audits are now happy — they’ve finally destroyed the American Dream and replaced it with a dreary wokist nightmare.
It is time to move on, to put Covidophobia aside and live life. We really need to get the politicians responsible for the farce to understand the anger that is being generated as people discover that granny died alone and in agony because greedy clinicians and pharma execs thought more of profit than of patients.
It is American Nationalism that will pull the USA through — a confidence in the Constitution, and the unblinkered application of one LAW for ALL. If Brandon is a traitor then he needs to be arrested and tried. The same with Clinton, Fauci and all those others that support them. May they rest in
MC lives in the southern Israeli city of Sderot. For his previous essays, see the MC Archives.