Our Israeli correspondent MC examines the similarities between the COVID/vax crisis and the AIDS/AZT crisis, as well as other examples of manufactured mass hysteria.
There is no virus; there is no killer COVID; there is no Delta (It is just vaccine breakthrough); but there are huge buckets of fear.
When we give up Judeo-Christianity, we also give up a faith in an afterlife, which means that death is a huge boogaloo rather than a passing from one state to another.
Every time we look out the window we see Creation, but whose creation? Darwin posited a random evolution from a basic cell, but made no speculation as to how the cell got there in the first place. That was left for others to argue about, an argument that is still raging, an argument that requires an explanation for ‘intelligent design’; a panspermia or an alien creation of some sort but not God, never God…
Yet we are still left trying to explain human consciousness in a rational manner. How did we become self-aware?
And how did we manage to throw it all away and succumb to fear? Yet again…
It is not the first time it has happened. Ruthless people can induce fear and terror to make a profit, to get what they want, be it shaheed status or wealth beyond measure.
Regimes that specialize in terror are called tyrannies, but we have never had a worldwide tyranny before, not like this one, not the global reset as a result of a pandemic that never was.
Except what? Virus cancer research would have crashed to a halt except that, in 1981, five cases of severe immune deficiencies were described by a Los Angeles physician, all among homosexual men who were also all sniffing amyl nitrite, were all abusing other drugs, abusing antibiotics, and probably suffering from malnutrition and STDs (sexually transmitted diseases). It would have been logical to hypothesize that these severe cases of immune deficiency had multiple toxic origins. This would have amounted to incrimination of these patients’ lifestyle. Unfortunately, such discrimination was, politically, totally unacceptable.
Therefore, another hypothesis had to be found — these patients were suffering from a contagious disease caused by a new retrovirus! Scientific data in support of this hypothesis was and, amazingly enough, still is totally missing. That did not matter, and instantaneous and passionate interest of cancer virus researchers and institutions erupted immediately. This was salvation for the viral laboratories where AIDS now became, almost overnight, the main focus of research. It generated huge financial support from Big Pharma, more budgets for the CDC and NIH, and nobody had to worry about the lifestyle of the patients who became at once the innocent victims of this horrible virus, soon labeled as HIV.
Twenty-five years later, the HIV 1 AIDS hypothesis has totally failed to achieve three major goals in spite of the huge research funding exclusively directed to projects based on it. No AIDS cure has ever been found; no verifiable epidemiological predictions have ever been made; and no HIV vaccine has ever been successfully prepared. Instead, highly toxic (but not curative) drugs have been most irresponsibly used, with frequent, lethal side effects. Yet not a single HIV particle has ever been observed by electron microscopy in the blood of patients supposedly having a high viral load! So what? All the most important newspapers and magazine have displayed attractive computerized, colorful images of HIV that all originate from laboratory cell cultures, but never from even a single AIDS patient. Despite this stunning omission the HIV I AIDS dogma is still solidly entrenched. Tens of thousands of researchers, and hundreds of major pharmaceutical companies continue to make huge profits based on the HIV hypothesis. And not one single AIDS patient has ever been cured.
But the real disease is ‘Virus Mania’: the belief that there are lethal pathogens out there just waiting to ambush us and take us as hosts and kill us in a gruesome manner…
Bugs… and boogaloo.
But the last thing a parasite like a virus actually wants to do is kill us. The successful virus exploits a host, but does not kill it; that is failure.
Yet we persist in cowering in our homes, masked up to the eyeballs as if we were Islamic women under the tyranny of religion, waiting to be beaten for burning an egg.
There is an element about this that I don’t understand — why the problem with ‘Science’? Did we not do the science at school? Simple cause and effect. Dr. Fauci’s early about-turns on facemasks, for example. When somebody abruptly U-turns, then you just know that cash, lies and politics are stronger than truths.
Fauci originally offered a credible reason why facemasks were ineffective: the ‘holes’ in the masks are many times bigger than the virus particles. This made sense; it was probably the last thing Fauci said that did make sense. Pharmaceuticals and noxious odours seem to go well together — and something definitely stinks when it comes to supposed viruses.
Take AZT, for example (please don’t). AZT was the first anti-AIDS drug. It was expensive, and had horrible (lethal) side effects that required other drugs to treat.
My friend Barry was diagnosed with AIDS in the mid-’80s. Barry was incorrigibly gay and enjoyed the lifestyle to the full. When required to take the AIDS test he made the mistake of admitting that he was gay on the application form. Like the COVID PCR test, the AIDS PCR test was horribly inaccurate, giving many false positives, to the point that said form became the arbiter of diagnosis, ‘at risk’ groups, as identified by the form, were automatically given a positive diagnosis. Much like COVID ‘cases’.
Without further ado Barry was put on AZT. He was fit and healthy when he started on the AZT, but he soon began to get AIDS symptoms. Why? Because AZT attacked the immune system. It was designed as an anti-cancer drug, but was too nasty for cancer-causing massive cell apoptosis (death).
Barry died nine months later, probably from AZT poisoning.
The DNA chain terminator AZT was designed over twenty years ago for the treatment of leukemia. Its anti-leukemic mechanism of action is to kill growing lymphocytes by termination of DNA synthesis. However, since AZT failed to prolong the lives of leukemic animals, it was not accepted for cancer chemotherapy. I n 1987 it was approved to treat symptomatic and asymptomatic carriers of HIV to cure or prevent AIDS, based on the hypothesis that HIV causes AIDS. One year later, in 1988, the designers of AZT received a Nobel prize for medicine, although there was no evidence that AZT would cure or prevent AIDS.
The rationale of AZT therapy is simple, if not naive: the retrovirus HIV depends on DNA synthesis for multiplication, and AZT terminates DNA synthesis. Thus AZT should stop AIDS, if AIDS were caused by HIV, and if HIV were multiplying during AIDS. Yet there is still no proof for the now six-year-old hypothesis that HIV causes AIDS. Moreover, many studies show that no more than one in 1,000 lymphocytes are ever infected by HIV — even in people dying from AIDS . Since AZT cannot distinguish between an infected and an uninfected cell , 999 uninfected cells must be killed to kill just one HIV-infected cell. This means that AZT, as a treatment for AIDS , has a very high toxicity index. In view of this, there is no rational explanation of how AZT could be beneficial to AIDS patients, even if HIV were proven to cause AIDS.
This should seem familiar, even down to the condoms instead of facemasks. The condoms were just as porous to the HIV fragments as facemasks are to COVID fragments.
There are very few toxic viruses. They do not survive if they kill their hosts; those hosts that die do so because of co-morbidities making virus combination fatal.
However, the medical profession is the third-largest killer in the USA. Iatrogenic deaths are a scourge. And there are many very rich doctors, and many others who accept lavish gifts and travel opportunities from Big Pharma — in normal life called bribery, but the medical profession turns a blind eye. Professional ‘trades unions’ have identical morals to teamsters and dockers (and teachers’ unions, it seems). The majority of medical doctors seem to be very happy to ‘do harm’ if they get well-rewarded for it. We are back to ‘bleeding’ and ‘purging’ rather than healing.
But what about Spanish Flu? It ravaged the German Army in 1918 and killed millions worldwide, but the German Army, and indeed the whole of Germany, was suffering from malnutrition, a co-morbidity that immolates the immune system. It was also treated by handfuls of aspirin — toxic in these sorts of quantities.
Colds and fu are uncomfortable and annoying, but they have provided a series of artificial medical crises which could not be allowed to go to waste, and fear is the key (but without the entertaining car chase). If we massage the psyche – stimulate it with pictures of coffins — we can induce mass hysteria, which can be either localised or, we as now realize, can be on a worldwide scale.
I have a fully rational fear of Islam; their explosive missiles come over at regular, if random, intervals. Where is the outrage? But Its only jooz and they deserve it. But what I have is not a ‘phobia’; a phobia is irrational. The Muslims are trying to kill me, and my only defence is to take cover. The ‘civilized’ world, by default, approves their actions and even pays for them. Covid is like a Hamas missile: there is little I can do to escape it, but I can harden my immune system by taking vitamins and minerals. The irrational bit is that whilst the government and NGOs provides air raid shelters, they do not provide the vitamins and minerals; they would rather have me suffering from blood clots and cardiomyopathy from dangerous injections for an only slightly dangerous virus.
Why does the government want me living in fear? Is it because they want to manipulate me?
Here is a summing up of the FDA-approved treatment for AIDS with the toxic drug AZT:
The multi-center clinical trials of AZT are perhaps the sloppiest and most poorly controlled trials. ever to serve as the basis for an FDA drug licensing approval. Conclusions of efficacy were based on an endpoint (mortality) not initially planned or formally followed in the study after the drug failed to demonstrate efficacy on all the originally intended endpoints. Because mortality was not an intended endpoint, causes of death were never verified. Despite this, and a frightening record of toxicity, the FDA approved AZT in record time, granting a treatment IND in less than five days and full pharmaceutical licensing in less than 6 months.
Familiar? It should be; the same Faucista people were involved…
Professor Duesberg aptly called this Iatrogenic Genocide.
Likewise, the whole ‘waycism’ scenario is fear-based. Skin colour is so easy to exploit, but it has never really been relevant in the best meritocracy that the planet has ever seen. But to point this out is ‘racist’ so we base fear on a circular argument; this gives an infallible advantage to the fearmonger until the victim of waycist terror is prepared to shrug off the accusations as sheer stupidity.
American slavery was predicated on the status of the mother, not her skin colour. The black slavery system was originally a ‘white’ slavery system:
Colonial Office, Public Records Office, London 1667, no. 170 records that “even Blacks referred to the White forced laborers in the colonies as ‘white slaves.’” Pages 343 through 346 of Historical Sketch of the Persecutions Suffered by the Catholics of Ireland by Patrick F. Moran refers to the transportation of the Irish to the colonies as the “slave-trade.”
Ulrich B. Phillips, Life and Labor in the Old South, explains that white enslavement was crucial to the development of the Negro slave system. The system set up for the white slaves governed, organized and controlled the system for the black slaves. Black slaves were “late comers fitted into a system already developed.” pp 25-26. John Pory declared in 1619, “White slaves are our principle wealth.”
People from the British Isles were kidnapped, put in chains and crammed into ships that transported hundreds of them at a time. Their destinations were Virginia, Boston, New York, Barbados and the West Indies. The white slaves were treated the same or worse than the black slaves. The white slave did not fetch a good price at the auction blocks. Bridenbaugh wrote in his accounting on page 118 that, having paid a bigger price for the Negro, the planters treated the black better than they did their “Christian” white servant. Even the Negroes recognized this and did not hesitate to show their contempt for those white men who, they could see, were worse off than themselves.
The sheer ignorance of progressive Democrats is blinding. We need to point the finger and laugh at their naïve and crass stupidity; instead we cringe, cower and comply.
As I’ve stated before on these pages, I am a racist. I am not worried about skin colour, but I prefer those who are culturally compatible; those who do not hate me because my parents’ and grandparents’ rulers did things which are now considered unacceptable by my current rulers.
But then waycism has always been an excuse, a broad highway to political and moral acceptability. The Nazis hated Jews amongst others, and this stereotyped the whole waycism culture, but somehow in the twisted and perverted morality of socialism, hating jooz is still acceptable, but we now also have to apply the anti-Nazi inverted-waycism to bash down so called ‘white supremacy’ in a skin-colour mêlée of ‘hate’.
Skin colour racism is the refuge of the bigoted, naïve ignoramuses who seek to hide their feelings of inadequacy, or of those whose wish is to divide, and to conquer. The British Raj and its ‘touch of the tarbrush’ bigotry probably destroyed the whole British Empire. In 1857 British India exploded in a violent race war which was savagely put down, and India was nationalised. John Company (The British East India Company) relinquished India to the Raj, and the servants of the Raj brought their petty racist inadequacies with them. Then in 1919 came Amritsar, and the maybe malicious, but certainly incompetent, Jallianwala Bagh massacre.
This was enough ammunition for a Nationalist movement to demonise the ‘white’ oppressors.
African Americans are not oppressed, but they can be made to think they are, for many of their ancestors actually were oppressed. But it was young ‘white’ men who fought and died for their liberation, and white families who grieved when their sons did not return. Each owes a huge debt to the other. But Democrats do not need reconciliation, they need dependency and brand loyalty, even if the brand is skewed with the running iron of malice.
The Democrat rule after the assassination of Lincoln (a Republican) established a culture of ‘discrimination’, of ‘Jim Crow’, where equality of opportunity was ignored and the ‘color bar’ was informally implemented, and when finally the Republicans stopped it, the Democrats fought them tooth and nail…
So are the Democrats still the party of oppression and fear. Is there still a Democrat ‘Klan’ pushing fear and strife, division and hate?
I think the answer is a resounding YES!
Antifa, BLM, the Squad, and the social ‘sciences’ academics should stop and question their own motives and lies, and wonder: Just where is their funding coming from?
But then maybe they just don’t care — $$$$$ morality rules KO…
MC lives in the southern Israeli city of Sderot. For his previous essays, see the MC Archives.