Full Interview With Richard Jomshof: “We Must Continue to Stand Up for What We Believe In”

Posted on by

Update: Errors in the translation have been corrected, in both the video and the transcript. Many thanks to Nex for checking the translation.

Last Friday I posted a couple of translations about remarks by Richard Jomshof, a member of Sverigedemokraterna (the Sweden Democrats) and the chairman of the Justice Committee in the Riksdag, the Swedish parliament. Mr. Jomshof’s “Islamophobia” provoked the ire of the Social Democrats and invited condemnation from all the Gutmenschen on the Swedish political scene.

Below is a subtitled version of the full Riks interview with Mr. Jomshof. Many thanks to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

00:00   There is a lot to say. What is going on now reminds us of what we saw
00:08   in Denmark in conjunction with the Mohammed cartoons.
00:12   And the crisis that Denmark was in back then.
00:16   It was a similar situation with many foreign voices, countries, representatives
00:21   who were calling for a boycott against Denmark.
00:24   This situation is not something new. We have seen it before against Charlie Hebdo, for example,
00:31   and the French satire magazine.
00:34   It has happened before that Islamists react. But ultimately that is what it is about.
00:40   It is about Islamists, it is about Islamic forces, Islamic representatives,
00:44   countries that evidently has as their goal to limit our democracy,
00:51   to limit our freedom of speech. And that is what makes it so serious.
00:55   But it becomes even more serious that we have such forces in our country,
01:00   Islamists in Sweden in this case, or in Denmark during the Mohammed cartoons,
01:05   who are working with these foreign forces with the same goal,
01:08   to limit democracy and freedom of speech.
01:11   It is obvious that it is serious, but my point is that in this kind of situation
01:16   we have to be adamant and stand up for our society, our democracy and our freedom of speech.
01:25   On the social media platform, Twitter, you have put out a screen dump
01:29   from Swedish television with an article where Muslim representatives
01:33   want to see a broader dialogue during this Koran crisis.
01:36   To which you respond with the following; “Yes, it is a crisis.”
01:40   It is about how Islamist with a large number of supporters are now
01:43   working with the goal of Islamizing Sweden.
01:46   “I agree that we need a broader dialogue. A dialogue about how we democratize
01:50   the Muslim world. Or why not a dialogue about Islam?”
01:54   Do you feel that you use a polarizing rhetoric in this?
02:00   Or the forces who mean that we must have a dialogue about this.
02:06   Do you feel, do you have any responsibility for the rhetoric about this?
02:09   That’s something we can discuss. The word is free. I think it is important
02:15   that we have a high ceiling in our democracy in Sweden, first of all.
02:20   And it is important to be able to talk about everything,
02:24   discuss everything, to dare to push the envelope.
02:27   But this is ultimately about a defense of our democracy and our freedom of speech.
02:33   Because there are prominent Muslim representatives, they are many, they are many more
02:37   than the two who speak in this short reportage.
02:41   Whose goal is to restrict freedom of speech and limit democracy.
02:47   And that’s what I react to. Of course we should have a dialogue. I have no problem talking to them.
02:52   But instead of talking about how we should limit our democracy or not,
02:57   we may rather need to talk about and have a dialogue about the Muslim world.
03:02   To try to democratize it. We know there are a lot of Muslim countries
03:07   where people are oppressed, persecuted, imprisoned.
03:10   Because they have a certain sexual orientation
03:13   or a certain political opinion or a certain religious background.
03:16   Where women are less worthy. That’s what we should talk about instead.
03:20   And that’s why we have to stand up for what we believe in,
03:23   for our values. And that’s the point here.
03:26   That we should not back down. On the contrary, we should stand up for what we believe in.
03:30   And yes, I don’t think I express myself particularly harshly.
03:35   I think I’m pretty correct when I express myself.
03:38   But there have always been people who think that when you point out and speak up
03:42   and want to discuss what is perhaps considered sensitive right now,
03:46   that you may have a polarizing effect or a polarizing language. But I don’t think so.
03:52   On the contrary, we must be open and honest with what we stand for and what we
03:56   think. I think it’s important.
03:59   At the time of the first Koran-burning that happened here this summer,
04:02   the government offered a dialogue with a number of Muslim countries.
04:06   Among them Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq and so on.
04:10   This is, yes, Saudi Arabia and Iran, which are totalitarian dictatorships.
04:15   What Iran is doing against human rights is no secret.
04:19   They hang homosexuals from cranes and so on
04:23   and crush protests against the regime in a very bloody way.
04:28   How come there is this automatic reflex that you should have a dialogue
04:33   with these dictatorships, rather then defending Sweden’s freedom of speech?
04:37   I have no problem with dialogue. To invite them into a conversation, I’m not critical of that.
04:42   But it’s rather what you say during those conversations. I wasn’t there,
04:48   so I don’t know exactly what was said or what kind of discussions they were.
04:52   But what you should do is rather to inform them
04:55   what applies in Sweden. This is how our democracy works.
04:59   We have this freedom of speech. We may not always agree with everything in the government.
05:04   But individuals in Sweden have the right to act within the framework of the law.
05:08   We have a very long-standing freedom of speech. We stand up for it. We back it up.
05:13   And explain what our society looks like, while in a dialogue like that also,
05:19   which I expect that you’d do,
05:22   point out the shortcomings that may exist in those countries.
05:26   Just as you said, Iran and Saudi Arabia are two of the worst Muslim dictatorships we have.
05:31   Saudi Arabia, as well as Salafists and Wahhabists, they are even worse.
05:35   And of course, during such conversations, we have to be able to express what we stand for
05:39   and where we think they are lacking.
05:42   So the dialogue in itself is not an issue. But it’s rather what you say during these discussions.
05:48   And we can’t fold at that point. We can’t turn our backs on democracy,
05:51   if that’s what you’ve done. But I wasn’t there, so I don’t know.
05:56   And I’m thinking that in the beginning of the summer, when the first Koran-burning happened,
06:04   by this Iraqi citizen, the government started talking about looking over the regulations to be able
06:08   to stop this type of demonstration, which a Koran burning is.
06:12   They meant that if it can affect the country’s security negatively,
06:17   then you shouldn’t be allowed to stage a certain type of demonstration.
06:22   You yourself were out there saying that it was a red line for you and the Sweden Democrats.
06:29   And this has been met with a lot of criticism from other people in the Parliament as well.
06:34   This government’s… This discussion that was there, that we have to look this over.
06:38   Alice Teodorescu, Ivar Arpi and other members of parliament have said
06:41   that we should stand up for the Swedish freedom of speech, not limit it.
06:44   But how come there is this automatic reflex among politicians, that they’d rather forbid
06:51   and restrict the Swedish freedom of speech than defend it?
06:55   We haven’t landed there yet. They’ve said that they’ll look over
07:00   the regulations. What the result of that would be, that remains to be seen.
07:04   But yes, of course there are these reactions. We are in a serious situation.
07:10   We should be aware of that.
07:13   And we have been for a very long time. And this serious situation is a result
07:17   of massive immigration from that part of the world.
07:21   Of people, not all of them of course, but a lot of people who are Islamists,
07:27   who have these kinds of values, who are capable of using violence to achieve their goals and so on.
07:34   And the bigger that group becomes, the more serious the situation becomes.
07:39   At the same time, countries like those, with their representatives, are applying pressure.
07:44   Of course the situation is serious. And in a situation like that,
07:50   trying to do what you can to calm the situation down, well, that’s pretty natural, maybe.
07:55   That you react in that way. But, in that kind of situation, you have to think
08:02   again and be very clear about explaining once again what our democracy looks like,
08:09   what it means, what you get and what you don’t get to do in a democracy like Sweden.
08:13   Then it becomes even more important and even more…
08:18   Yes, even more important to actually explain, and try to explain,
08:23   regardless of whether it’s possible to reach out or not, what Sweden is as a country.
08:30   I think that’s the only way forward. I want to emphasize
08:33   what has been done in both Denmark and France, for example.
08:37   You can say what you want about Macron and the French government,
08:40   but they have been very clear against the Islamists.
08:43   For example, that you shouldn’t use expressions like “Islamophobia”, which you
08:46   have actually said on the French side that you shouldn’t do.
08:49   And Anders Fogh Rasmussen, during the Mohammed cartoon affair, was also very clear
08:54   that they wouldn’t bow their heads in Denmark.
08:58   And that clarity is something I want in Sweden. I understand that automatic reflex.
09:03   We are in a dangerous situation.
09:06   We shouldn’t underestimate it. But then it’s even more important
09:09   to be clear. That’s my opinion, anyway.
09:12   You yourself mentioned earlier that you should burn another 100 Korans.
09:17   What do you mean by that? Do you want to see more Koran burnings?
09:20   Yes and no. I have said that many times. No, I don’t want to. I have been very clear
09:24   that I don’t think you should burn those books at all.
09:28   My criticism of Islam and Islamism is probably quite well-known
09:34   in this situation, but I would never do it myself or commit such an act.
09:39   I think it’s enough to be verbal. It’s enough to express yourself in writing,
09:44   in a verbal way, because you will get criticism for it anyway.
09:48   But I mean that it’s the best way forward. If you want change, then you should
09:54   debate, discuss. I think that’s the only way forward.
10:01   But this thing with 100 Korans, once again, it’s a broad perspective. It doesn’t matter
10:06   if we talk about Muhammad cartoons,
10:09   we talk about Charlie Hebdo, the satirical newspaper in France
10:13   and their satirical writing on Mohammed, for example.
10:16   Or we talk about South Park, which I have also mentioned a few times.
10:19   And the episode where they removed the book that contained Muhammad, which ends
10:23   with the fact that they never showed it because they didn’t dare, because of death threats and criticism.
10:27   Or if we talk about the burning of Korans, all of these are examples…
10:31   Or Salman Rushdie for that matter, “The Satanic Verses”.
10:35   All of those are different examples of things that have met very hard criticism
10:41   in the Muslim world, especially from Islamic circles.
10:46   The point is, if a non-democrat, if an anti-democrat, says to me or to us,
10:53   “You can’t do that,” then my point is: “Then we should continue to do it.”
10:57   Of course it’s more tasteful to draw caricatures or show a cartoon
11:03   than maybe burn a book, but the point is still that we can’t fold
11:06   to that kind of power. That’s the point here. I don’t think we
11:12   should burn books. I think we should criticize Islam and Islamism,
11:17   and do it verbally instead, through debate and discussion. But that’s still allowed.
11:21   We have to stand up for our democracy and our freedom of expression.
11:24   That’s the point here. And it’s probably very important to emphasize that.
11:30   The head of the Security Police [SÄPO], Charlotte von Essen, mentioned today, on Thursday,
11:34   at a press conference, that Sweden has gone from being a legitimate target for Islamic terrorism
11:41   to a prioritized target. And you were talking a little about, for example,
11:47   that we’ve had a very large migration from the Middle East,
11:50   and we’ve seen this before, the Koran riots during Easter of 2022, when hundreds
11:56   of police officers were injured, with extensive vandalism in the city.
12:02   How come the connection between the large migration from the Middle East
12:06   and the deteriorated security situation in Sweden,
12:09   that very few politicians make that connection?
12:13   I think that there are quite a few who make that connection.
12:19   At least I think that the number of politicians who make that connection has increased
12:23   significantly in recent years, but very few speak out.
12:28   And I think that’s a shame. Because we have ruined it ourselves.
12:33   We have created a very serious situation, as a direct result of the very naive
12:39   policy we have had in Sweden in recent decades.
12:42   Then there are a few others, at least the Sweden Democrats, who have warned and criticized.
12:47   And now I think that more people are waking up, more people are starting to realize.
12:51   But we would not have had this situation if it weren’t for the large migration,
12:55   and that there are forces in Sweden, even political parties, that have accepted Islamization
12:59   and accepted those kinds of forces and given them space.
13:03   So of course it is a very, very dangerous situation we are in.
13:09   But we should not be silent in that situation.
13:14   On the contrary, we must continue to stand up for what we believe in.
13:20   And yes, that was my answer.
13:26   But what are your solutions? If we see a sharp threat to Sweden,
13:31   we have seen the embassy stormed in Iraq,
13:34   we see in Yemen how people demonstrate with automatic carbines and knives
13:41   on streets and squares, where in Pakistan they burn the Swedish flag.
13:45   What do you think? How should we ensure security in Sweden today
13:53   to guarantee Swedish freedoms and rights?
13:57   It is not an easy situation we are in. This will not subside.
14:04   I tweeted a while ago, and I’m not the only one who said that, but the Islamists,
14:09   if we give them a finger, they will take the whole hand.
14:12   This is a process that has been going on for a long time.
14:16   When we have seen criticism of our part of the world for a long time, and it will not stop.
14:21   And even if we were to ban the Koran burning, it would not have that kind of power.
14:25   The Islamists would not stop there, they would just move their positions forward.
14:30   So what we should do, yes, but once again, it is clear that we should be able
14:33   to have conversations, clear that we should be able to have dialogue.
14:37   I think so. I don’t think the government has done anything wrong,
14:40   but we should be clear about what we stand for.
14:43   That is the first thing. And not back down. We cannot back down.
14:47   We must constantly stand up for our democracy, our freedom of expression,
14:51   even if we do not agree with a certain opinion.
14:54   Even if we do not agree with a certain expression of opinion. I do not agree
14:57   with all opinions or all expressions of opinion.
15:00   Once again, I don’t think we should burn the Koran, but I stand up for the right to do so.
15:04   And we have to do that. That is the first thing.
15:08   And I think the only way to try to settle this is to have this kind of discussion
15:14   and dialogue constantly with the representatives of those sorts of countries.
15:18   But I’m still somewhat negative, given that we have had
15:23   this kind of discussion and dialogue for quite a long time.
15:26   Not least concerning the Mohammed cartoons in Denmark
15:31   or the French government, in the wake of Charlie Hebdo and all the terror attacks in France.
15:36   We must remember that they have been very steadfast in France. Despite the threat,
15:42   despite all the direct terrorist attacks on French soil, and there have been quite a few,
15:49   they have continued to be very vigilant and clear against the Islamists
15:55   and said that they will never fold. And that’s what we should do.
15:59   Even if it means that, unfortunately, these kinds of forces do not let up.
16:06   But then we come to the next step, and it is once again Swedish immigration policy.
16:12   And there we must have a discussion about whether it is good that
16:16   These sorts of people are allowed to enter Sweden.
16:19   I do not think so. And that’s why we have to scrutinize Swedish immigration policy.
16:23   We have to examine, which we have pointed out, both myself and my party,
16:26   the Sweden Democrats, have often pointed out the importance of examining
16:30   the financing, for example, of the Swedish mosques. We know that a large number
16:33   of Swedish mosques are financed by Muslim states.
16:38   Who pump money into Sweden and who send imams, Islamists,
16:45   who preach their anti-democratic messages here in Sweden.
16:48   These kinds of people should not be in Sweden; they should be deported.
16:51   The type of mosque that has that sort of connection and financing should be closed.
16:56   We have to fight against the Islamists, because if this continues for a few more decades.
17:04   With the massive immigration, especially from these kinds of countries, and where
17:09   we may at worst also bow to these kinds of pressures,
17:13   we are facing a very dangerous situation in the future, where I think that Swedish democracy
17:19   will be very limited and look completely different from what it is today.
17:25   We have to stand up for ourselves. I think we may even see
17:32   that other politicians and other parties have begun to understand this.
17:36   I hope so, because otherwise I think we will have a very dark future.
17:44   I would rather see my children and possibly grandchildren enjoy the benefits
17:51   of growing up in such a democratic country as Sweden is.
17:57   I was thinking about a number of things, for example, closing mosques
18:02   with hate preachers and that sort of thing.
18:05   One thing that has been recognized about this is money for education. Now it’s not —
18:10   your area of responsibility, but billions have gone to various associations,
18:15   immigrant associations, Muslim associations, which have connections
18:21   to Islamist states, Islamists and others.
18:24   Not much has happened in regards to stopping this funding.
18:29   These are organizations that have been active in Sweden
18:33   and are actually inciting against the Swedish government, that they are trying
18:37   to undermine Swedish democracy and freedom of expression in different ways.
18:41   Do you think this will lead to a broader political consensus to actually stop funding?
18:47   I hope so. The discussions are ongoing. I mean, just look at these.
18:52   these influence campaigns where there are groups that seriously claim
18:57   that Swedish authorities are kidnapping Muslim children.
19:00   And then they use this lie and spread it in the Muslim world.
19:06   There are communities in Sweden that receive money and spread those kinds of lies
19:09   that are supposed to Islamize Sweden.
19:12   Yes, of course we have to see what kind of contribution it is.
19:16   The discussions are ongoing and I want to emphasize that I’m quite positive about the future,
19:21   in that case, that I think we will see a change in that area. Because it also has to.
19:26   Because it’s completely crazy, of course, that people come here and set up associations,
19:32   whose goal is to segregate, isolate, Islamize, to work against Sweden,
19:38   against Swedish democracy. Of course we have to see what kind of contribution it is.
19:43   I think it will happen, too. I’m pretty hopeful. On that front, at least.
19:48   And your party colleague Aron Emilsson, who is chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee,
19:53   after Iraqis stormed the Swedish embassy, said Sweden can no longer maintain
19:59   any kind of diplomatic activity in Iraq.
20:02   He said that it’s time to reconsider aid to Iraq. Iraq received about 276 million SEK
20:08   in aid in 2022. We see it in Yemen, where demonstrators have taken to the streets
20:13   and directed threats towards Sweden.
20:16   Yemen receives hundreds of millions of SEK in aid every year. Isn’t it time
20:20   to reconsider the aid for these countries when Sweden is facing this aggression?
20:25   Yes, it is. I think we should withdraw the aid, but that kind of discussion is ongoing.
20:31   To look at which countries get money and why.
20:36   Of course it can be a strong means of repression. Why should we give money
20:40   to countries that are working against us? I mean, it’s a reasonable question.
20:44   But the discussion is ongoing. And I’m pretty hopeful there, too.
20:48   And in the latest budget the government has already actually reviewed Swedish aid.
20:54   And there has been a reduction. And I think, or I know, that this discussion will continue.
21:01   So the answer to the question is: of course. We should not give money
21:04   to countries that are working against us, simply put.
21:10   But the discussion is ongoing. I think there will be changes.
21:17   I think we will see, in future budgets, how our aid is continually reviewed.
21:25   It’s an important way to go, I think. But it’s not in my purview,
21:29   and it’s not really my discussion. Other than that I have a very strong opinion about this issue.
21:32   And I think, in conclusion: as you see it, what do you think
21:37   will be the political consequences of this?
21:41   Do you think we’ll get a broader debate about Islam in Sweden?
21:45   You and a few party comrades for quite a long time have been talking about
21:50   the threat of Islamism and the Islamization of Sweden.
21:54   But what I’m experiencing now is that there has been a much broader debate here recently.
21:59   We see, as I said, that even moderate debaters have been thrown into this debate.
22:03   And they talk about freedom of expression, that it is important to preserve it.
22:08   It is much less overshadowed than it may have traditionally been in Sweden.
22:11   But what do you think will be the long-term political consequences or development of this crisis?
22:18   That’s a good question. I don’t know. I hope that it will also lead,
22:23   hereafter, to us continuing to stand up for our democracy, our freedom of expression.
22:29   I hope that will be the result, and that more people actually understand —
22:36   learn, understand what it means to live in a democracy.
22:40   I’m also talking about Swedes who have lived here for generations.
22:45   That one must be allowed to offend, it must be allowed to use —
22:49   to criticize each other using sharp words.
22:53   It must be allowed. And I hope that we will still have a country where it is that way
22:58   even in the future, so to speak. So that we don’t go in the opposite direction.
23:04   But I’m still quite hopeful. And those of us who believe in our democracy,
23:10   who believe in freedom of expression, who want to preserve it, it is important that we are concise.
23:15   Then, of course, you must also have respect for the current situation. Of course,
23:20   you ought to think twice every time you say or do something.
23:26   But my view, my opinion right now, here today, is that we must stick to our guns,
23:32   we must be clear about what we think. And we can’t — we can’t fold.
23:40   So I’m hopeful. I hope and believe that we also…
23:46   That the Sweden we have today will still be there. But it is important
23:51   that we have governments who believe in it and who are
23:55   willing to drive that line and who are willing to defend everything that Sweden stands for.
23:59   So we are at a breaking point right now. And there are two ways forward.
24:05   And I hope that the line I believe in is the one that wins.
24:09   Because otherwise, at some point, a future generation will grow up
24:15   in a much poorer and more dangerous Sweden.
24:18   But I hope we win. I think you can still see that the forces of that nature are growing stronger.
24:24   Those who want to defend Swedish democracy and who understand what Islamism is all about.
 

14 thoughts on “Full Interview With Richard Jomshof: “We Must Continue to Stand Up for What We Believe In””

  2. It seems to me that the Muslims were imported to Europe as part of the WEF/UN agenda to be used as the boots that would grind the democracies of Europe under their heel of subjugation so that those who remained would do as they are told without question. Those who didn’t, refused to, or asked questions would have the islamic enforcement arm of the New Order explain things to them more clearly. Islam in Europe and LGBTQ+ in America carrying out an agenda that had its beginnings with President Wilson and the League of Nations.
    I should say that the agenda appears to be in its final act before the curtain is lowered and the audience exits the theatre.

    • @ acuara

      Yes. But America is not that far behind Europe regarding Islamization, and the same goes for Europe concerning faggot Marxism and all the rest of Agenda 21 enemy vectors. Just different districts of the same NWO, managed differently.

    • Until human nature kicks in, we have instant communication unlike yesteryear where communications could be controlled, for now you can’t stop the signal. The control on weapons is not as tight as what European governments think they are as well.

  3. “Those who want to defend Swedish democracy and who understand what Islamism is all about.”

    — Huh? By “democracy” he means that awful Marxist tyranny that’s responsible for the Islamization of Sweden in the first place?

    And the usage of the PC weasel word “Islamism” signals that Mr. Jomshof is on the defensive. Also, all kinds of “dialogue” with Islam is futile, only power works. You cannot talk your way out of Jihad.

    From such defensive grounds you cannot win against Islam… So, is Jomhof a brave defender or controlled opp (or both) ???

    On the other hand, I’ve seen such public “dialogues” with prominent Muslims in Europe and I know that the audience is already so deceived about the “religion of peace” that you cannot be too direct and jump to conclusions because then the audience will think that you are the bad guy in the story. Therefore one has to remain factual the way Dr. Bill Warner does.

    Even with taking all that into consideration, talking about “Islamism” leads nowhere if one choses the path of educating the masses about the true face of Islam.

    It’s a very nasty war, I tell ya. With no “good” outcomes any more — we’re beyond that point.

    Eurabia sucks.

    • I don’t know about “no good outcomes”.

      If it results in the africans and arabs sent packing back to where they came from or remaining as culturally enriching fertilizer, the political and financial elites ending up as objects impaled on poles, Europe being returned to patriarchy, and ejection of Nato, the EU and American hegemony then it would be a good outcome.

      • @ Moon

        Not so fast! First we’ll have to wait a couple of more decades to see how the “dialogue” with “Islamism” goes…

        • I agree, but coming from a Swede it’s as radical an act as one of them putting salt, pepper, or any kind of spices on their food.

          Swedes are heavily programmed to begin with and way too trusting for their own good. Kind of the human equivalent of the dodo bird, wandering about aimlessly while the islamic predator walks up to them with a club and dispatches them for the pot.

          • @ Moon

            Exactly. That’s what I have experienced when I was in Sweden some years ago. Dodo birds.

        • Do not believe them, you folks don’t have decades, unfortunately your learning curve is going to be short, sweet and to the bloody point, it will be a them or us education, there is only arguing the semantics of how you will rid ourselves of the 3rd world orcs and their leftist enablers and traitors, lesson over.

  4. We all know that there is no peaceful solution to this regarding our elites and moslems. I purged my mind of that peaceful fantasy long ago. Or we can tolerate islam until our last throat is cut.

  5. Everybody here knows, well except Mark and a few other Brits, that there is no peaceful civilized way out of this mess, there is no voting your way out either, it is a simple equation, them or us, there is no middle ground where this is concerned, the only difference is the semantics of carrying it out and the will to roll up your sleeves, hoist the Black flag of skull and bones, cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war. The difference between the Americans and Europeans is that Americans are armed to the teeth and more prone to massive violence due to our gun culture, the elites know this and it frustrates them to no end that Americans are too stubborn to give up their arms for their own good of course, and time is running out and the elites know it. Tick Tock the sand is running out of the hour glass by the minute. Especially if this election in 2024 goes sideways. No one, one way or another ,is going to like the result, therefore let cards fall as they may. Frankly speaking, I can’t wait the islamic orcs take jihad to Swedish shores and do what they do best and the look of politicians on how they will try to cover it up. LOL

  6. @ G

    You’re right, unfortunately. Some places are already Islamic in Europe.

    • The only thing left to do is get your mind right and do whatever is necessary to ensure ours are the last ones standing.

Comments are closed.