All Western democracies are welfare states to varying degrees, the most extreme versions being Germany and Sweden. An important component of the welfare state is its care for the aged. In recent decades life expectancy has increased, along with the cost of geriatric medicine. The cost increase is not linear — the last decade of life for those over 75 is, on average, very expensive, and governments are footing the bill.
Back in 2008 I posted about the coming demographic crisis and how various Western governments might decide to cope with it. It was clear that the Baby Boomers — my generation, the proverbial “pig in the python” — would eventually break the system as they entered retirement and became more and more expensive to maintain.
The current demographic debacle was foreseen long ago, all the way back in the 1960s and 1970s. The preferred solution back then was to import immigrants from the fecund Third World, who would become productive citizens, generating the tax revenues that would be crucial to supporting the Boomers in their dotage. In addition, Aisha and Mehmet would be trained to take jobs as nurses and medical technicians to staff the nursing homes that would eventually be bursting at the seams with the Aged of Aquarius.
Alas, the scheme failed to work out as planned: the newcomers tend to consume more in government benefits than they contribute in taxes. Furthermore, their occupational skills haven’t managed to reach the level of the natives they are supplanting, so that providing adequate care for the elderly becomes problematic. If the experience of the National Health Service in the UK is any indication, the on-the-job behavior of third-world immigrant caregivers goes beyond negligence to active abuse, and even becomes homicidal on occasion.
Raising the retirement age is one strategy to cope with the problem, but it is politically difficult to implement, and can even cause mass unrest. Besides, there’s a limit to how much it can be raised — just think of Joe Biden being employed as a bus driver or a store manager. We geezers tend to become less and less competent after attaining our allotted three score and ten.
By the time I wrote my post on the topic, it had become clear that the Powers That Be would have to do something fairly soon about the eldercare crisis. Projecting the situation a quarter-century into the future showed that it was catastrophically unsustainable. In 2017 I posted a follow-up, augmenting the gloomy prognosis with more detailed demographic data.
Obviously, it isn’t possible to increase the number of 20- to 50-year-olds in the population. There is, however, another way to increase the ratio of the young to the elderly; it’s just one that can’t ever be mentioned in public. Nevertheless, I’m sure it has been discussed extensively at closed-door meetings within the governing class, at both the national and the globalist NWO Davos-and-Bilderberg levels.
Geronticide has become an obvious necessity from the point of view of anyone who wishes to maintain the existing system in its current form. But how to accomplish it without generating mass unrest, rebellion, and systemic instability?
Half that quarter-century has elapsed since I first began making grim projections of geronticide. Back then I speculated about what form the culling of the aged would take, proposing several general strategies, beginning with triage and neglect. The latter was evident in care homes for the elderly in the UK. The quality of care varied by region, but overall the aged fared better if their families could afford something besides the NHS.
The NHS has also floated various schemes of triage, proposing to deny care to smokers, or the obese, or those with unhealthy eating habits.
Such actions, however, can only nibble away at the margins of the elderly population. To achieve a reduction that would lower costs significantly, more draconian measures would be required. Yet those would have to be implemented in a manner that the general public would not perceive as geronticide. How can that possibly be accomplished?
The past eighteen months of this extraordinary time we live in has allowed us to see the general outline of what is intended. The geronticide has now left the planning stages. The process of implementation has begun.
I’ve been waiting for the “vaccination” project to unfold completely before assaying an analysis of these momentous events. Enough data have now come in, however, to permit some educated guesses about what the man behind the curtain intends.
I’m making several assumptions. Firstly, all the actors in the process — Dr. Fauci, the Wuhan lab, the WHO, the CDC, the vaccine manufacturers, the media, various national governments, the pocket totalitarians among the mayors and governors who oppress their citizens with lockdowns — are being manipulated to serve the purposes of the architects of the geronticide.
The mayors and governors love their new despotic powers, but contrary to what many people think, that in itself is not the motive for the new totalitarianism. Those who designed the crisis understood well what a taste of tyrannical power would do to the progressives who rule our major urban conglomerations. Tyranny was indeed necessary to accomplish the ends of the project, so all those Li’l Hitlers were exactly what was needed.
The vaccine manufacturers and the patent holders for the mRNA treatments are making inconceivably large amounts of money from the rollout of the “vaccines”. Those players are surely motivated by profit, but their avarice is simply a tool that has proved useful to the Powers That Be.
The Red Chinese may be making what they consider to be a bioweapon derived from various animal-based coronaviruses and augmented by gain-of-function research. But the architects of the geronticide, by channeling the funding of the lab through the avaricious Dr. Fauci and his cronies, were able to direct the production of the exact pathogen required for their purposes.
Every bureaucrat at every stage of the process is gaining power and prestige from what is currently unfolding. Fiefdoms in medical bureaucracies are being enlarged and enhanced. The directors of corporations and state enterprises are getting richer and more powerful. Once again, they are all useful tools for those planners who never lose sight of the larger goals.
It’s also important to bear in mind that the apparent failures of the “vaccines” are actually not bugs, but features. The side effects of the vax further the goals of the project. The failure of the vax to protect people from infection, plus its enhancement of the virus’s infectivity, help achieve the desired result.
We’ll start by looking at the characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It was engineered to spread rapidly. It poses almost no danger to the young, but can be deadly to the elderly. What better agent to spread like wildfire through nursing homes?
Consider the fact that New York Governor Andrew Cuomo ordered that COVID-19 patients be transferred from hospitals to nursing homes. Was that simple incompetence on his part? Or did someone higher up the food chain whisper the suggestion into his ear? Either explanation is possible.
Now consider the “vaccine”. First of all, the basic technique used in the jab was developed and even patented long before COVID-19 hit the scene. It was obviously a crucial component of the larger project.
The spike protein manufactured by the vax can do serious harm, spreading throughout the body via the bloodstream and potentially causing thromboses and auto-immune disorders. Among its sequelae is possible infertility, which would be an added bonus for the architects of the plan — population reduction has long been an announced goal for Bill Gates and other advocates of mass vaccination. So the disease itself knocks off the elderly, while the vax gelds and spays the next generation — giving the population-planners a twofer.
The long-range outcome of mass “vaccination” is to select for more virulent strains of the virus in those who enjoy its protection, while simultaneously inhibiting the immune response of its recipients to those variants. In other words, people who get the vax are more susceptible to later versions of the same virus against which they have supposedly been inoculated. Once again, the elderly and those with existing health problems are the most likely to die from it, thereby curtailing the expensive medical and maintenance care the state is providing for them.
It’s imperative that the general public remain totally unaware of what the Powers That Be are doing to them. To that end, public opinion — including carefully nurtured hysteria and panic — must be controlled and guided. Fortunately for the planners, all major media outlets and Big Tech are totally on board with the project, even if they have no clue as to its intended goal. No dictator in history has ever been able to manipulate public perceptions as effectively as can be achieved by media moguls in the third decade of the 21st century.
When the Wuhan Coronavirus was released — whether intentionally or accidentally is still unclear — the first goal of the planners was to instill panic in the general public. The dangers of the disease were hyped, and lurid tales of what went on in China were amplified in the media. Then, when COVID-19 arrived in the West, the PCR test was deliberately misused to inflate the number of “cases” and generate the requisite hysteria so that national and regional governments could more readily arrogate totalitarian powers unto themselves. In effect, the populace was induced to demand that its liberties be revoked and tyranny imposed.
After many months of deprivation and hardship, people were more than ready to embrace the vaccine as their savior. Do you want your normal life to return? Get the vax! Do you want to eat in restaurants or go to a ball game? Get the vax! Do you want to have a New Year’s party? Get the vax!
By the time 2021 rolled around, most people were begging to get a toxic mRNA injection in order to have their lives back. And, all too predictably, it turned out that the promises were lies — you can’t have your life back. You have to keep masking and distancing. And above all… you have to get more “vaccines”!
Last week I discussed the intensive “social marketing” push to overcome “vaccine hesitancy” among the general public and increase “vaccine uptake”. The propaganda effort has spared no expense. It is being rolled out via major media, social media, government information programs, churches, the educational system, and all other possible forums for public communication. Nothing like it has ever occurred before within my lifetime.
That’s what tells you that a concealed nefarious purpose is at work. As a disease, COVID-19 isn’t that much worse than the flu, yet the flu vaccine has never been pushed with even 10% of this intensity. The whole point of COVID is clearly to get everyone vaxed as quickly as possible.
That’s the way things stand today. When the “boosters” fail to work, and more and more “vaccinated” people catch COVID and die, a ready explanation has already been concocted: the unvaccinated are at fault. We deplorables who refuse the vax have become “variant factories”, generating new strains of the disease that are resistant to previous jabs. We must be reviled, shunned, excoriated, punished, and induced to get the vax by any means necessary.
It’s a perfectly-constructed program of deception, persuasion, and coercion in equal parts. As long as the number of people who become aware of the hoax remains manageably small, it can’t help but succeed.
The above discussion is meant to serve as an outline of the planned geronticide project. Various of its specific assertions can be wrong without invalidating its general conclusion: What is happening now is a carefully-planned component of a long-term project of population reduction, especially among the elderly.
There is still much that we don’t know. COVID-19 may have escaped from the lab accidentally. It may have been released deliberately by China. In either case, the Powers That Be seized the opportunity to implement a plan that had been decades in development.
On the other hand, a certain three-letter agency may have arranged the release in coordination with the geronticide planners. The proximity of the “Event 201” exercise lends some weight to that possibility.
There are other aspects of the vax that I have left unexamined because I don’t have enough data on them. For example, there has been much discussion of the possibility that the jabs include minute amounts of the toxic chemical graphene oxide, which can be activated by a magnetic field and allegedly used to connect the body’s cells to the Internet of Things. It’s an intriguing idea, but I don’t have enough information to assess its credibility.
Brandon Smith published an excellent essay speculating that induced infertility may be the intended result of the vax. However, he thinks that the failure of a large percentage of the population to get the jab has provided a control group that demonstrates the ineffectiveness of the “vaccine” and thereby frustrates the designs of the vax planners.
I think he’s mistaken on that last point. Under my scenario, a residual pool of the unvaxed is necessary to provide “variant factories” for the later strains of COVID that will emerge to kill more elderly people.
An article by Geert Vanden Bossche gives that speculation more plausibility. Dr. Vanden Bossche is an expert in the field, so his analysis is somewhat technical. The gist, as I understand it, is that the interaction between mutated variants being passed between vaxed and unvaxed people is guaranteeing the production of more highly infectious variants that the vaccines are ineffective against. The new variants will put more and more people at risk, beginning with those who have other health issues. He implores the medical authorities to immediately halt their vaccination program.
Once again, to my mind the scenario described by Dr. Vanden Bossche is a feature, not a bug. It dovetails with what Brandon Smith discussed. A pool of the unvaxed is necessary, at least at first, to make sure that new, more infectious strains of COVID-19 continue to appear. The disease and the mRNA treatment have been engineered to work in tandem, interacting to produce more infectious COVID variants.
Furthermore, as long as there are significant numbers of the unvaxed, they can be blamed for the existence of each new “variant”. By the time every vax refuser has been jabbed and/or exterminated, the program will have long since achieved its purpose.
I’d like to thank MissPiggy for the copious amounts of information on COVID-19 and the vax that she has provided over the past eighteen months, and to WRSA for tips on the pieces by Brandon Smith and Geert Vanden Bossche.
I’ll conclude with a (somewhat apposite) excerpt from the immortal words of William Butler Yeats, taken from his poem “Sailing to Byzantium”:
An aged man is but a paltry thing,
A tattered coat upon a stick, unless
Soul clap its hands and sing, and louder sing
For every tatter in its mortal dress…