Seneca III sends his latest report from the Emirate of al-Britannia.
The Muslim Underground Surfaces
Part I: Saturday 28th October 2023
by Seneca III
As I write (1200 hrs GMT, October 28) large crowds of Muslims of every flavour, together with other aficionados of the Demented Slaves of Allah, are gathering in Londonistan, Manchester, Birmingham, Glasgow and probably in other smaller locations that have also been infected with the Religion of Death and Atrocity virus.
This clandestine occupation has been long in the making and, relative to Israel’s recent experience, it has been a quieter process in terms of outright violence here in Britain. We have had, of course, the 7/7/2005 bombings in London, the Manchester Arena bombing in 2/5/2017 and the Satanic Verses debacle accompanied by its global fatwa and book-burnings, plus the child grooming (raping) gangs operating with impunity in their British-occupied territories, but not with the real feral mass insanity and bloodlust that Israel is dealing with today, and which we will be faced with in the near future, and should see a revealing glimpse of today and cannot afford to ignore.
The grim reality is that Islam travels in a Trojan Horse named Diversity, Inclusion and Equity, i.e. DIE, a phrase that acronymically, albeit accidentally, perfectly describes what the future holds for us unless we indigenous Caucasians eliminate it and them once and for all.
We are very close to the edge now, and it comes as no surprise that many British Jews have travelled to Israel because they feel far safer in places such as Tel Aviv where they are under constant aerial attack than they do in London and other European cities.
[1330 hrs: Gatherings increasing in volume in Londonistan and Birmingham. No surprises there in either case, of course; both have long been fully occupied and can no longer be considered British in any way, simply festering cesspits full of primitives. This is a photo of Gaza, not Birmingham…
…unfortunately.]
Mosques in the UK: The number of mosques in the UK varies depending on the source and the definition of a mosque. However, a reasonable estimate is that there are around 1,800 to 2,000 mosques. These mosques serve about three and a half million Muslims, who make up about 5% of the UK population. The most common size for a mosque in the UK is between 101 to 200 people. This figure does not include the many secret mosques in residential properties established without planning permission from the relevant local authorities. I speak from personal experience here: seven years ago, an extended Muslim family moved into a small bungalow located on the corner of a quiet cul-de-sac in my town. This move was carried out quietly and in the depths of night. Subsequently they applied for planning permission for some small additions/alterations inside the house which, in fact, was not owned by the applicants at all but by one of the two sizeable mosques located in our county town twenty-five miles away.
During the time the local authority was processing this application, the ownership came to light and the fact that this application had not been submitted by the actual owners of the property as is required by law, but by their tenants. The application was then adjusted and resubmitted accordingly and later approved.
The deceit did not end there, however. Neighbours later noticed that a large extension taking up most of the garden had been secretly built in the rear and that on Fridays the cul-de-sac was clogged by out-of-town cars. They complained to the local Town Council who in turn passed it onto the District Council for resolution. The DC finally sent a building inspector to look into the situation and what he found was an eye-opener even for this cynical old observer of Islam.
He found that the back half of the house had been gutted and joined to the illegal extension in order to create a mosque with a carpeted space for the headbangers, divided in half for men at the front and women at the rear, each with their own bathroom, leaving only the small front room and the hall and front door facing the street to be used as the family residence.
Eventually, after several years of legal arguments, the extension was demolished and the house returned to its original shape and function, although I don’t know who footed the bill.
Irrespective, I am of a mind that it should have been completely gutted, demolished and the ground salted.
[1600 hrs. Police officer seriously assaulted in central Londonistan and hospitalised.]
This is not just happening in the UK alone, but in various combinations all across the West. Anti-Semitic attacks are soaring, and cities are witnessing huge demonstrations demanding the demise of Israel whilst millions of Hamas supporters spread throughout the universities, news organisations, and legislatures in the rest of the free world loudly endorsing this proposed genocide.
The reality is that the mantra “Free Palestine” is nothing less than a 21st-century version of Sieg Heil. As Hamas’s charter declares, “there is no solution for the Palestinian question except through jihad” and, as a consequence, we are now faced with something far more dangerous than the Nazi ideologues of old. The Third Reich never had the benefit of millions of supporters spread throughout the universities, news organisations, and legislatures in the rest of the free world, all loudly endorsing the Nazis’ racialist case for a ‘Judenfrei’ Europe. We do.
Across the non-Muslim Western Ecumene, anti-Semitic attacks are ongoing, and huge demonstrations proclaim support for Hamas to the sound of calls for Jihad, and then claims that it doesn’t mean war but an inner spiritual matter.
In actuality, the word Jihad does indeed have two meanings, but the reality lies in the way they are used. The meaning at any given time varies depending on the specific definition that the users wish to emphasise at a particular time or in a particular place to polarise a particular audience.
LESSER JIHAD is a struggle or fight against the enemies of Islam. Example: “He declared a jihad against the infidels” or “the importance of jihad as a uniting force”.
GREATER JIHAD is the spiritual struggle within oneself against sin. A point that seems to have escaped the Rotherham child-rapists unless, of course, they have a different understanding than we do as to what constitutes sin.
And yet we are told that we are facing yet more of these demonstrations every Saturday for the foreseeable future! No, that must not be; we must immediately initiate an appropriate course of action, but it will require a government with a realistic understanding of the threat, a substantial backbone and no vested interest in allowing this situation to continue.
I would suggest an immediate declaration of Martial Law, the mobilisation of whatever reserve forces we currently have, and the raising, training and arming of more, followed by the closing of the ‘In’ door and the opening of the ‘Out’ door to the command: Fix bayonets! — Advance! (Metaphorically speaking, of course).
Yet more ‘demonstrations? Perhaps, perhaps not; we may well begin to understand that the inevitable result of invasion by stealth is occupation by force. Invasion by force is a different matter entirely, however, as the head of the Palestine Mission to the UK has found out, having lost contact with his family. In a statement on X (formerly Twitter), Husam Zomlot said: “I have been trying to reach my family in Gaza for hours with no success. All telecommunications and internet have been cut, while Israeli strikes it is literally destroying Gaza from air land and sea. How many more innocent people: children, parents and grandparents will be murdered before the world steps in?”
Well, Husam, not too soon, I hope. No ‘world’ interference yet as you and yours have some serious lessons to learn and digest before that happens. Allah kareem, I suspect.
Part II will follow in due course.
—Seneca III, still in the bucolic eye of the gathering storm this 28th day of October in the year of our Lord 2023.
For links to previous essays by Seneca III, see the Seneca III Archives.
The truth hurts.
Great and accurate article. I said to a friend, who told me not to go to Israel: tell me what is the difference between Britain and Israel? In Britain the police protect the muzrats, in Israel they protect the Jews.
Now that an islam party has been founded, Brits, you voted for what’s coming.
Re: “Now that an islam party has been founded, Brits, you voted for what’s coming.”
Undoubtedly, many Britons have been guilty of complacency and normalcy bias where the problem of Islam is concerned. However, you are being a trifle harsh, are you not, in stating that they “voted for what’s coming”?
What I mean is this: The political and economic elites have fixed things in Britain (as they have all over Europe) such that no matter who “wins” an election, they benefit. This is done by exerting control over who runs and who makes it onto the ballot in the first place.
And in those rare cases where possibly genuine reformers make it onto the voting rolls and get before the public, these self-same elites have done quite a job discrediting those individuals and their parties.
In France, for example, consider the case of Marine Le Pen, who was subjected to the politics of personal destruction and thereby marginalized as a bigot and extremist, even though she is none of those things.
My larger point is that the people ~ everyday common people ~ whether in the U.K., France or someplace else ~ do not “want” what the globalists elites are offering them. True, there are people who have been brainwashed into believing in multiculturalism and diversity and mass immigration, but these are the exception and not the rule.
There is blame which attaches to the common person: Not paying enough attention to what their leaders were/are doing, for example. Not taking the warnings seriously of people like Tommy Robinson (UK) or Geert Wilders (Netherlands), or going further back, Enoch Powell.
And now that Muslims have attained critical mass, i.e., the numbers to make political gains, those native-born dissidents in places like the U.K. are finding that regardless of how they vote, their interests are not heard.
The bottom line, then, is that Britons didn’t ask for this, for what is happening to them. It was foisted upon them by their so-called leaders.
Over in France, they have the same problem: Emmanuel Macron won election, and despite public opinion polls showing overwhelming public support against limiting immigration, he then got up in front of the French public and bluntly told them, “There are more immigrants coming to France,” or words to that effect.
By blaming the public you are assigning responsibility for the crisis precisely where the ruling class and elites want it, on the common person rather than on them. Was that in fact your intention?
Get your fellow countrymen to raise cane and LEAVE the BLOODY EU!!!
Islam has been openly telling us they’d take over by replacing our populations. We didn’t believe them. Then they started DOING it–openly. We STILL didn’t believe them! Now we have this problem in MANY Western cities. We still don’t REALLY believe them! LOL! At some point we need to wake up and smell the coffee!
@DEFIANT
Re: “We still don’t REALLY believe them! LOL! At some point we need to wake up and smell the coffee!”
Yes, that would be a good idea! A brief anecdote illustrates the point…
The late Elie Wiesel (1928-2016) survived imprisonment in two different German concentration camps during the Second World, Auschwitz and Buchenwald. Later, he become a world-famous writer, professor and advocate for peace ~ as well as a Nobel Prize winner for his book “Night” about his experiences in WW2.
Near the end of his life, Wiesel was asked in an interview to sum up in a sentence or two what he had learned from his harrowing ordeal as a youth in the camps, and after reflecting for a moment he replied: “When someone says they want to kill you, believe them…”
Peace and prosperity are almost always good things, but there is a downside to such safety and security in that they often get taken for granted. Many westerners, indeed many people around the world, have lived in peace and tranquility for so long that they simply assume that the world is no longer a dangerous place and that evil isn’t real.
One is reminded of the H.G. Wells 1895 novel, “The Time Machine,” which posits a dystopia in which humanity has split into two strains, the prosperous Eloi and the violent Morlocks. Care to guess who is playing the role of the Eloi in today’s world, and who is playing that of the savage Morlocks?
Normalcy and confirmation biases are very real, and most people, looking at the world today, assume that it is more-or-less the same as it was yesterday, and that it will be much the same tomorrow. But of course, the reality is that nothing stays the same from day to day, from moment to moment… it is simply that we are always not wired, neurologically-speaking, to see it as well as we might like.
And we are all good at denial when it comes to things we’d rather not face. It is only human nature not to want to face unpleasant or difficult circumstances. Sometimes, it is easier not to look at them, so we do not.
Ultimately, events will overtake these cognitive biases and penetrate the denial … or they will not, and people will continue along as they have always done.
It is true, though, I believe that one can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar as the old folk saying goes. Attacking or ridiculing those who haven’t yet “gotten the clue” might be tempting at times, but it is ultimately counterproductive and gets no one anywhere. Kindness and compassion are the order of the day. When the student is ready, the teacher can appear…
And in difficult times, it is never a bad idea to have as many friends and allies as possible…
The person currently designated as the “leader” of the Labour Party is as we speak being trained (aka bullied) so that he knows his place, and will kowtow to the Islamic faction within the party. In the future (the near future) the official opposition party will either have a subservient puppet as the face of the party, with the Islamic members pulling the strings and directing policy and events. Or – if Starmer resists (highly unlikely, you need a backbone an principles for that) they will have him out and, no longer having to remain underground, will just go for it and have a Muslim person as the new leader of the Labour Party.
Who might that be ???
Let’s all remember the position Boris Johnson held before he became PM … major of London.
Typo alert:
“Emmanuel Macron won election, and despite public opinion polls showing overwhelming public support against limiting immigration…”
Should have read..
“Emmanuel Macron won election, and despite public opinion polls showing overwhelming public support against unlimited immigration…”
My apologies…
Thomas Jefferson realized the future of failure and took action did he not? YES, he did! God bless his memory… (him and the other upstarts, George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Harry Truman — Donald John Trump, et al)
Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and John Quincy Adams, amongst other Founding Fathers of the United States of America, debated and discussed whether or not Islam ought to be banned in the U.S. Constitution.
They fully knew the long history of conflict between the Christian West and the Islamic world, and were also aware of the piracy, raids, and hostage-taking against shipping then occurring in the Mediterranean off the Barbary Coast of North Africa, at the hands of its Islamic residents.
However, they demurred in the end, probably because they could not imagine a future time in which the new nation would be so foolish as to surrender its birthright to the Saracens.
Adams and Jefferson both experienced the problem directly, as Presidents and Commanders-in-Chief. Because the new republic was still more-0r-less broke and lacked the ability to project maritime force to any great degree, Adams (our second president) dealt with the Barbary Coast pirates and their demands for ransom by paying the tribute to secure the release of the shipping and prisoners.
By the time Thomas Jefferson took the helm of the nation, the problem had worsened as the Barbary pirates were emboldened to stage more raids and acts of piracy by the ransoms already paid by various European nations and the U.S.
Fed-up, Jefferson acted to get the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps the resources they needed to solve the problem militarily. Which they did by bloodying the pasha’s nose in a series of stinging defeats. Today the USMC still remembers those battles in the line “To the Shore of Tripoli,” which form part of the Marine hymn.
Jefferson was smart: He knew that you don’t get rid of a bully by placating him or giving in to his demands, in other words by appeasing him… you do it by punching him in the nose!
Still not armed up yet?? The writing is on the bloody wall ! Chance favors the prepared mind.
@G
Re: “The writing is on the bloody wall ! Chance favors the prepared mind.”
The writing is indeed on the wall. History tells us that Muslims follow a similar pattern when they emigrate from their countries of origin in Dar al-Islam (the Islamic world) to infidel lands such as those in the West.
First, a fairly small number go to the U.K. and establish a presence, a beach-head or colony if you will. Because they are small in number, they take pains not to cause trouble or attract attention.
Over time, as their numbers grow and an Islamic diaspora is formed, they begin making relatively modest demands, such as the serving of halal foods, the provision of special times/places for daily prayer, and so on.
As their numbers trend into the double-digits as a percentage of the population, Muslims begin becoming more assertive, even aggressive, in their demands. In the vernacular, they start flexing their muscles demographically. Muslims-only areas near major cities begin to form, and within them, sharia law is enacted and enforced by “sharia patrols” and the like.
It is around this time that attacks upon infidels ~ especially infidel women and children ~ begin to ramp up, both in duration and intensity. Mobs of Muslim youths begin setting fire to cars en mass, vandalizing churches and synagogues, or committing acts of rape and other forms of assault. Officials pass these acts off as more-or-lesss random acts of crime, but in reality, they are the beginnings of a campaign of jihad.
As the Islamic presence growths further, their increasing numbers embolden the trouble-makers, who begin to wage acts of low-intensity warfare upon surrounding society. We see this in places like Sweden, where police stations have had to fortify themselves against small arms fire and grenade attacks. Or in the Islamic ghettos outside of Paris, France ~ which are so violent and dangerous that emergency fire and medical personnel will only enter with an armed escort.
By this time, the Muslims are quite open about their control of certain sectors of major cities. When several hundred of them decide it is time for prayer and roll out their prayer mat en-mass and pray towards Mecca, there isn’t a whole lot the authorities can do about it, even though the “migrants” have closed down a major traffic thoroughfare in the process!
These are signs of domination, of rule over the kafir or infidel. And the Muslims know it… just as they also know they are doing as their prophet commanded.
The tipping point into generalized civil unrest occurs somewhere in between this stage and the time during which the believers attain numbers sufficient to allow them to wage irregular warfare against others whom they deem targets. Using such events in Africa as a guide, this can occur with 20-30% of the population being Muslim, sometimes more, depending on local circumstances and other variables. If the government is pro-Muslim, as it was in the Sudan during the 1990s Darfur crisis, serious trouble can erupt quite early on.
Of course, no civilized person ~ least of all your humble correspondent ~ wishes for any of this mayhem, chaos or violence to occur, but ordinary people often have no say in the matter and therefore must take prudent steps to protect themselves and their loved ones.
We now live in the land of wolves now and the sheep don’t realize they are what’s for dinner. I used to be a sheepdog, there to protect the sheep, until the sheep told us that we looked and did things that were to mean and our methods they couldn’t stomach because we are civilized they told us. So, we quit, and now have become the Dire Wolves of old for nothing beats a wolf better than a larger and far more complex predator like a Dire Wolf, the sheep will have to make do now to their peril.
“We now live in the land of wolves now and the sheep don’t realize they are what’s for dinner. I used to be a sheepdog, there to protect the sheep, until the sheep told us that we looked and did things that were to mean and our methods they couldn’t stomach because we are civilized they told us. So, we quit, and now have become the Dire Wolves of old for nothing beats a wolf better than a larger and far more complex predator like a Dire Wolf, the sheep will have to make do now to their peril.”
Preaching to the choir, but worth repeating….frequently.
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” —Benjamin Franklin (1775)
Tony Blair and Peter Mandelson are going to burn in hell for what they’ve done.
Wasn’t there a newspaper article some time back which said that the ruling elite (as they like to think of themselves) had decided to rub everyone’s noses in “diversity”?? Possibly in the Evening Standard?
@ TruthTeller
It is interesting in a sort of macabre way that the so-called “elites” seem to believe that they can use Islam and the Muslims for their purposes, without any difficulty or blow-back happening to them. History shows otherwise: A great many powerful folks down the years have thought they were using the the Muslims, only to find out that the believers were using them instead.
In other words, they’re riding a tiger yet don’t seem to realize that sooner or later, it will turn upon them.
The only solution to the Muslim vs. Jew conflict is to expel all of each flavor from Europe, Britain, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. Let them all return to their ‘holy land’ along with whichever ‘Christians’ adhere to the ‘chosen people’. Let them fight it out over there and leave the lands of the Indo-Europeans in peace.