Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the online news portal Nius. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:
Because authorities are overloaded: There are many more asylum seekers than the official figures show
According to the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees, 27,889 initial asylum applications were made in September alone — that corresponds to 950 people per day. In reality, however, the number is likely to be much higher, as Welt am Sontag learned from government circles.
The reason: The authorities are so overloaded with processing asylum applications that many people are initially only registered and the asylum application is only submitted later and therefore only appears later in the statistics. Many asylum seekers have to wait months until their application is submitted.
In reality, the agency is assuming more than 40,000 asylum entries in September and October. That is at least 40% more than the official statistics indicate, which corresponds to at least 1,300 new asylum seekers per day.
The traffic light* government has announced in recent weeks that it wants to take tougher action against illegal migration — and also wants to deport rejected asylum applicants more consistently. The “Repatriation Improvement Act” presented by Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser (SPD) will — according to her ministry’s assumption — only make 600 additional deportations per year possible.
Looking at the current numbers of asylum arrivals, this does not appear to be a “big decision”, as the Chancellor called it, but rather a [microscopic] micro-component of a different migration policy. [In simpler terms, it’s cultural genocide business as usual.]
Afterword from the translator:
“Definition of Statistics: The science of producing unreliable facts from reliable figures.” — Evan Esar
or in the clearer words of Sir Winston Churchill: “Do not trust any statistics you did not fake yourself.”
It’s always the same: the essential feature of all our respective governments and their “statistics” is the prudent, deliberate and systematic ignoring of details and facts. No matter the cost to the native population.
Conclusion: Let’s just send more virtueless welcoming “virtue” signals into hostile cultures since the country and its native populace is still standing.
| * | “Traffic light” coalition government: | |||
| Red: | Social Democratic Party | |||
| Yellow: | Free Democratic Party | |||
| Green: | Alliance90 / The Greens |
|||
It seems clear that neither the Rio Grande nor the Med are barriers to be passed only once Covid jab proof is presented. Or has anybody read of such an entry requirement?
So is the plan for the jabbed elderly white indigenes in North America or the EU to die and get chronically ill while the youngish immi-vaders remain unjabbed? Or is the jab rate in Africa or West Asia or LatAm higher than I thought?
You see, I am trying to discern the logic of importing healthy masses of immi-vaders who are not needed in a pending labour market dominated by AI. And who for lack of jabs will not be morbid either, and thus a profit centre for pharma. A man of 25 from Africa who speaks no German or French or Italian for the respective labour forces is destined for a universal basic income, that is all.
Or are the young immi-vaders to be jabbed and thus become morbid at the next Scamdemic, thus ensuring ca. 30 or 40 years of cash flow for pharma once the elderly white indigenes have died off for natural or Jab reasons?
I mean, are the immi-vaders meant to be Demand for the Supply of goods flown to them in their gubbermint-paid apartments by labour-saving Amazon drones?
Or is it really the case that the Wokeist Open Border Compassion and Empathy is truly in the driving seat? Unlikely. But if so, what is the economic rationale for immi-vaders? Are they to take on jobs that cannot be done by AI? Which?
What’s the difference between non-Western neighbours/countrymen in Western countries and non-Westerners in non-Western countries?
I have read this question three times but still have no idea what you are driving at.
We are becoming one global family by design, “our” central planners/social engineers have imported/are importing non-Westerners into our midst.
Alright, now I understand what you are driving at.
However, what is the aim of the “by design” to which you refer?
Because the official version peddled by Western EU governments, that their labour forces have to be filled up with Third Worlders because local indigenous Europeans are elderly with low birthrates and thus dying out, conflicts with the forecast abolition of jobs by AI.
Soon they will keep on dying!