25 thoughts on “Gustav Kasselstrand: “Sweden Will Become a Muslim Country””

1. This people slept fir too long
   It’s too late now
   Time to act
   Words are becoming useless

2. Huh….

   Is Anders Behring Breivik being Proven Right in his writings?
   I dont approve of his methods, thats for sure.
   But his writings…
   I know it was Norway.

   • Where white flight is concerned, there is no more places to run to, so ethnic cleansing works both ways, and once it is understood of how dire the situation is where it is a us or them, my bet is on the good old DNA of conquer and kill all in our way of the European man will kick in with a very bloody vengeance. Human nature demands it, it is the survival mechanism of every tribe since man walked upright.

3. If Gustav Kasselstrand truly means what he says, and is determined that his daughter will not grow up in an Islamic caliphate once known as Sweden then he and his fellow countrymen had better snap out of their decades-long slumber and face the fact that their own government – aided and abetted by the European Union, of course – is not only doing nothing to stop the slow-motion conquest of their homeland, but aiding and abetting that conquest.

   The 1,400 year long history of the twilight war between the West and Islam shows that once Muslims colonize and conquer a place in the name of their faith, they regard that ground as part of Dar al-Islam, “The House of Islam,” and will defend it unto death.

   Look at how long it took the Spanish to recover their homeland after its conquest by the Moors in the in the year 711 A.D. It was only during the reign of King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella more than seven-hundred years later that the Spanish were finally able to drive the invaders out.

   And once a land has been part of the Islamic world, it is regarded as being so permanently, even if it changes hands again temporarily. This is why Osama Bin Laden called Spain “al-Andalus,” for that is the Arabic name for the Iberian Peninsula, what Muslims call modern-day Spain and Portugal.

   No civilized person wishes such a thing to come to pass, but the blunt fact of the matter is that if ordinary Swedes are unwilling to fight to save their homeland, it will probably fall to the invaders and the occupiers and their accomplices. If the soldiers of Allah resort to the sword, then the Swedes must be prepared to do likewise.

   Although many Swedes do not realize it as such, the war has already begun. The shahids -“true believers of Islam” – are already waging jihad against Swedes and Sweden. Grenade attacks upon police stations, rapes of Swedish women in broad daylight, acts of mass arson, grooming gangs and other criminal enterprises in Malmo and elsewhere. Acts of terrorism of various kinds…. these are symptomatic of fourth-generation conflict, a low-level Islamic insurgency.

   The authorities in Stockholm and in Brussels know this, but hide the fact from the public. The existence of hidden weapons caches in Swedish mosques and other hiding places has been known for years. The Muslims have been smuggling weapons, ammunition and other equipment/gear leftover from the 1990s Balkans Civil War up through central Europe and into Scandinavia for some time now.

   The Swedish police could raid these storage facilities and roll up these de facto military bases & fortifications, yet they do nothing of any real value. That alone is proof of the fact that Muslims in Sweden are sheltered under some sort of official protection, even if it is only apathy.

   And if the authorities wont act to save Sweden, then the people themselves are the last line of defense. External forces are trying hard to keep Swedish and other European eyes focused on Russia and the Ukraine crisis, but that is a red-herring: The greater danger lies much closer to home.

4. One way or another, there is going to be a lot of blood spilt, nature demands it.

   • @ G

     Re: “One way or another, there is going to be a lot of blood spilled, nature demands it.”

     Well, given that low-intensity warfare is already happening in Sweden, that blood-shed has already started…. it is mostly Swedish blood being spilled by the soldiers of Allah now, but that pendulum can swing only so far in one direction before it comes back with a vengeance in the other direction.

     At least that is what history predicts, but nothing is preordained. Therefore, the operative question would seem to be: Does any trace of the blood of the ancient Vikings still coarse through Swedish veins or not?

     • What you say is completely true, the problem with Swedes is, it takes a while to get them angry enough to act, but once they do let that anger flow through their veins it truly is a fun thing to watch. I grew up with thousands of Swedes where I live in the US and they are the same sort as they are in Sweden. You are right, nothing is preordained, but my money is on human nature and what happens when push comes to shove.

5. Once a country has a reached a critical mass of third world-migrants (ow whatever you like to call them), the whole thing becomes a self-perpetuating process.

   From then on it’s not enough to just stop any further immigration (which is difficult enough, even if the political will exists).
   You would have to try to get rid of many of those former migrants.
   Which now are citizens, at least nominally or have permanent residence status.
   When the larger population realizes what is happening it’s basically too late already.
   The next step is white flight and “ethnic cleansing” resulting from permanent low level violence and cultural alienation.
   Disintegration of the former national state and civil war becomes just a question of time.

   • Perfectly put

   • Where white flight is concerned, there is no more places to run to, so ethnic cleansing works both ways, and once it is understood of how dire the situation is where it is a us or them, my bet is on the good old DNA of conquer and kill all in our way of the European man will kick in with a very bloody vengeance. Human nature demands it, it is the survival mechanism of every tribe since man walked upright.

     • Maybe, but not with today’s generations.
       Especially in Western European countries the young age groups are dominated by them, not by the native Europeans.

       In some countries native Europeans are only still the majority because of the larger percentage of older generations.
       Even without further immigration demographic would be shifting in their favor – for the moment.
       I don’t say it’s a hopeless case, history teaches that almost everything can be turned around.
       But this will be a long and hard struggle, one of many generations to come.
       And preserving our culture-s and ethnic composition will be equally important as taking our lands back.

       • You would be surprised at how fast these youngsters can go tribal given the right incentive to do so. The young white European male is rapidly finding out that he is a hated species and that diversity means hatred and exclusion of the white male,it means his exclusion from the workplace, marriage and society, they are getting angrier by the day for their dismissal from societies their ancestors built. Once the right man who comes along and harnesses that power and directs their wrath to those who vex him, those white men will be unleashed to take back what is perceived as theirs, and God won’t be helping those who stand in their way. The wrath of the angry white male will be Biblical, as in old Testament. For everybody forgets at their peril, that nobody does total war better than an angry white European male.

6. Regarding Europe – any solution on a national political level is almost useless as long as the EU still exists.
   Only when the EU is dismantled people can also get rid of the ruling globalist elite in their own political institutions.

7. I wonder if the glaring disparity between what Swedish politicians called “refugees from the 3rd world” for 40 years, who mostly weren’t “fleeing war and persecution”, imported out of the goodness of their black hearts for apparently “humanitarian reasons”, despite mounting integration problems, and recent real refugees from Ukraine caused awkward questions to occur. The most obvious being: why did Sweden fill its taxpayer funded refugee reception capacity with undeserving economic opportunists who don’t want to be Swedish?

   We can only hope it’s the first trickle of a flood.

   • Just remember this.

     Muslims are not human. And they have no conscience at all.

     • They are simply human beings who haven’t been poisoned by Christian moral absolutes. They aren’t atheists with a Christian culture.

       • Well, I’m not too keen on Christian moral absolutes, especially when they try to impose them on others (eg abortion), but I dislike Muslim ones even more.

         teresa, Muslims have been brainwashed for twelve centuries or more, and the most numerous victims are Muslim women, but sad to say, they’re mostly the victims of a form of Stockholm syndrome. Of course we should oppose the islamisation of our societies, but shouldn’t we also empathise with them, or does your Christian compassion not extend so far?

         • It is your bloody empathy for those GD 3rd world savages is why we are here in the first place. It is God’s job for empathy, sympathy and forgiveness, it is our job to arrange the meeting, because it comes down to the cold, brutal fact, it is them or us!

         • @ Mark H.

           Re: “Muslims have been brainwashed for twelve centuries or more, and the most numerous victims are Muslim women, but sad to say, they’re mostly the victims of a form of Stockholm syndrome. Of course we should oppose the islamisation of our societies, but shouldn’t we also empathise with them, or does your Christian compassion not extend so far?”

           For the answer to this dilemma, perhaps we should turn to following philosophic observation made by Sir Karl Popper, which has since become known as the “paradox of tolerance” (1945)…

           “Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.”

           I do not know who Popper had in mind when writing those words – perhaps the Nazis – but they could have been written about Islam and Muslims, so well do they apply to them.

           Misplaced compassion towards Islam and Muslims at the present time is only appeasement by another name. The hardliners within the umma are far-too-powerful and the moderates (if even they exist) are far-too-weak for any real negotiation to take place.

           Moreover, if there are any prospects for reform within Islam – by which I mean reform in a more-modern and temperate direction – they will have to come from Muslims and from within Islam. For various reasons, it cannot come from without. And since “reform” is often interpreted as apostasy by the ulema (wise men and jurists of Islam), which is punishable by death under sharia law, such a movement seems problematic at best and therefore unlikely to happen.

           We saw the dynamic in play during Reagan’s time in office. Firm against the communists, rather than weak as Carter had been, he got them to the negotiating table. Muslims are taught that compassion for an enemy is a sign of weakness, not strength, so vacillation, apparent kindness and compassion only embolden the shahids “true believers) that much more.

           The famous Churchill quote is apt: “An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last”… meaning that the appeaser does not purchase any safety or security for himself via appeasement or attempts to bribe the assailant into a less-aggressive posture.

           There are female dissidents in the Islamic world, but they are small in number and their influence upon events is nil. This is because most Islamic women, like most Islamic males, believe wholeheartedly in their way of life.

           Over the centuries, the non-Muslim world has fared best against the depredations of the soldiers of Allah when it has remained vigilant and strong. The relative peace between the Islamic and non-Muslim worlds over the last two-to-three centuries has come about only because the West has had military superiority during most of that time.

           Did not Sheik Osama himself speak of the strong horse and the weak horse? Muslims do not respect the weak horse, but only the strong one. So it is wise to endeavor to be the strong one.

         • Georgiaboy61 and G: I wasn’t advocating showing weakness in the face of the threat from Islam. One can still recognise that people living under any totalitarian system have more limited options for changing things than we do in what remains of our democracies.

         • Mark, Tolerance is the last virtue of a dying society. A 3rd worlder is a 3rd worlder is a 3rd worlder. They will side with their tribe over our tribe anytime push comes to shove, as nature always intended.

         • No Mark, we should not EVER empathise with them. While I would like to write War and Peace in relation to this I will simply say this:

           Islam is a violent proselytizing ideology, (not a religion) that has given itself permission to apply it’s own 7th century rules to the whole world. Believing muslims exercise that idea on a daily basis and he rest of the world suffers the consequences. (some countries more than others)

           The left have succeeded in calling anyone who objects to muslim domination a racist and until there is serious pushback against this islamic advancement will continue.

   • @ Treereen

     Re: “The most obvious being: why did Sweden fill its taxpayer funded refugee reception capacity with undeserving economic opportunists who don’t want to be Swedish?”

     “The weaponization of compassion” has been a potent tool in the arsenal of the globalist oligarchs at the European Union and elsewhere. The reason nations like Sweden and Germany find themselves so ill-prepared to protect themselves is that they have been subjected to what amounts to a forty or fifty-year long campaign of psychological warfare conducted by the ruling class of the West against its very own people.

     None of this has been done in the open and on the level, of course, but the clues are everywhere if you know how to spot them.

     The ads telling Swedish and German women and girls to befriend, date and marry a Muslim from the Middle East or North Africa, instead of a native European.

     Elderly pensioners being kicked out of government-funded apartments to make way for “immigrants” recently arrived from other places.

     Muslim thugs conducting a reign of terror in European cities, ranging from rape to fire-bombings to arson to sex grooming gangs, yet the authorities wring their hands and government’s response is not to cut off the flow of “refugees” or deport the ones causing the trouble, but to tell the public that more “refugees” are on the way!

     And when/if the politicians mention Islam and crime, it is usually to blame native Germans or Swedes for the crimes of Muslims, because the former were “not welcoming enough.”

     Then there are things like the feminization of western culture, the elevation of women into jobs best-suited to men, such as policeman, soldier or the like, alongside of the diminution of traditional European notions of manhood.

     If one follows the trail of the evidence, it leads to the reality that the so-called “elites” of the West have decided to destroy what remains of traditional western civilization, as these economic & political elites and their globalist allies see it as a roadblock to creating a new global economic and political order with themselves at its head.

     It is analogous to tearing down an old structure – a building or a house or an entire neighborhood – so that a new real-estate development can be built in its place.

     Since Islam is, by its very nature, relentless hostile to western civilization and Christianity, it is a potent force for dismantling the West. It would not surprise me to learn that the wealthiest billionaires from the Sunni Arab world are among the most-powerful globalists at Davos and elsewhere. They’re certainly rich enough for a seat at that particular table, and they see themselves as conquerors, too – imagery which undoubtedly appeals to some of their colleagues.

     • The elite non-muslims are going to learn the hard way that the muslims won’t share power.

8. @ tedh754

   Re: “The elite non-muslims are going to learn the hard way that the muslims won’t share power.”

   You’re quite right, and recent history proves it. Back during the height of the Cold War, the American CIA turned to the Ikhwan or Muslim Brotherhood as they are known in the West, hoping to use them as a weapon against the communists. The Brotherhood played along with the scheme, and used the spies at Langley even as the agency thought it was using them.

   The Muslim Brothers established a foothold with a mosque in Munich, and from there expanded throughout Europe. The Central Intelligence Agency thought they were playing the ‘Brothers, but it turned out to be precisely the opposite, as amply detailed in Ian Johnson’s well-researched 2010 book.

   The globalist oligarchs are now trying to ride that same tiger, believing that they can use the Muslims as a means to an end, but what if it is happening in reverse, just as it did in Munich? If so, the western oligarchs will learn the lesson that Muslim truces and peace-treaties with infidels are not considered binding, and may be broken at any time it benefits the cause of Islam and Muslims.

Comments are closed.