A year ago Michael Copeland posted his first selection of reviews of the Koran. Below is his second selection.
Book Reviews II: The Koran
Compiled by Michael Copeland
- “…this indigestible book, whose every page makes healthy human reason quiver.” — Voltaire (1694-1778)
- “This book is a long conference of God, the angels, and Mahomet, which that false prophet very grossly invented…” — George Sale, Introduction to “The Koran, commonly called the Alcoran of Mohammed”, 1784, belonging to Thomas Jefferson.
- “The precept of the Koran is, perpetual war against all who deny, that Mahomet is the prophet of God.” — John Quincy Adams (1767-1848), 6th President of the United States
- “…incites violence, disturbs public tranquillity, promotes, on grounds of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred, and ill-will between different religious communities…” — The Writ Application in The High Court at Calcutta
- “The Koran is not the solution to Islamic radicalism, it is the cause.” — Daniel Greenfield
- “To tell you the truth, I didn’t find anything I liked.” — Ashin Wirathu, Buddhist monk activist, Myanmar
- “…a confusing and tedious book that most people don’t enjoy.” — Ali Sina, ex-Muslim
- “It offers nothing but ignorance.” — Apostate Prophet
- “a unified message of triumphalism, otherworldliness, and religious hatred” — Sam Harris
- “a clearly-written, us-versus-them hate-crime book, endorsing a permanent might-makes-right death-threat.” — Uncle Vladdi, comment
- “a pretty tedious screed of exhortations to violence against unbelievers interspersed with an occasional thought on the Last Judgment.” — Kepha, comment
- “It’s horrendous. Shocking. Disgusting.” — OP, comment
- “…the worst major religious work of all time, … exceedingly repetitive, stupid, boring, nauseating and disgusting ….” — Wellington, comment Jan 31, 2020 at 6:16 pm
- “that turgid, ranting little tract” — Geoffrey Cooper, comment
- April 24, 2016 at 6:45 am
- “… a document of exclusion, hatred and violence…” — bannedquran20
- “It’s definitely not a book from God!!” — Mario Alexis Portella, priest
- “…does seem to be a manifesto of a criminal organization that is bent upon lying, cheating, stealing, extortion, sexual abuse, and murder. Should the adherents to what this ‘book’ proclaims be subject to the terms of the RICO act?” — ac, comment, November 17, 2019 at 5:50 pm
For previous essays by Michael Copeland, see the Michael Copeland Archives.