The Guardian and the Quilliam Foundation Battle the “Far Right”

I have a few points to make about the recent (and notorious) Guardian hit-piece on the “far right”, but first let’s look at what Tommy Robinson has to say about the media campaign against him, of which the Grauniad article is only a small part:

The following link for Tommy’s book Enemy of the State is for the Kindle version, because that’s all you can get on the American Amazon site.

Dymphna checked the stats on, and Tommy’s book is indeed #1 in Sociology, and #9 in Biography. It’s selling well in part because of the concerted attacks by most of the British media against him and other “right-wing extremists”. And, as it happens, that’s one of the major issues that sticks in the craw of The Guardian: the persistent popularity of Tommy Robinson.

The Grauniad has done hit-pieces against us in the past, and I originally intended to ignore this latest one. The article contains nothing worth noting — it is spun out of fluff and gossamer, and conveys no substantial information. A one-sentence summary would cover it: “Right-wingers are bad, and we need to shut them down by any means necessary!”

However, Tommy’s video (and some of his tweets) made me look into the article a little more closely. With the help of Egri Nök, who did extensive research into the German and Chinese angles, the author of the hit-piece turned out to be an interesting character indeed.

But first, let’s look at the article itself. It was written by a young lady named Julia Ebner, and is entitled “The far right thrives on global networks. They must be fought online and off”. Below are some relevant quotes:

…The Metropolitan police even warned that the threat from far-right groups is as severe as the jihadist threat.


British “counter-jihadis” have stepped up their cooperation with American alt-righters, French and Austrian “identitarians” and even German and Polish neo-Nazis. This is the paradox of modern-day nationalists: they capitalise on the opportunities of globalisation to spread their anti-globalist views globally.

It is within this context that EDL founder turned Pegida UK leader Tommy Robinson features prominently on Alex Jones’s conspiracy theory show, Infowars, and receives support from American alt-right leaders Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller. Platforms such as Gates of Vienna, the FrontPage Mag and Jihad Watch provide outlets for all of them.

Once their ideas are carried into social media echo chambers, hateful rhetoric quickly turns into crime and calls for violence… These online nexus points have enabled British far-right activists to mobilise young people, hijack online subcultures and obfuscate the 24-hour media circle by spreading hyper-partisan and alternative news.


That the far right has moved from the fringe into the mainstream demonstrates the massive support that white supremacist movements have attracted from digital natives. Their online followership often exceeds that of mainstream political parties: with over 200,000 followers, Tommy Robinson’s Twitter account has almost the same number of followers as Theresa May’s.

Neo-Nazis outperform Isis in nearly every metric…


To prevent radicalisation, hate crimes and violent extremism, we will need to tackle the source of reciprocal radicalisation: the vicious circle of hate driven by “us against them” narratives. Disbanding groups and removing extremist online content is the first step. But, more importantly, we will need to strengthen civil society-led efforts to dissect binary world views and replace them with credible, more nuanced alternatives.

Take note of this juxtaposition:

…Tommy Robinson’s Twitter account has almost the same number of followers as Theresa May’s.

Neo-Nazis outperform Isis in nearly every metric…

That is, she conveys the message “Tommy is a neo-Nazi” without actually saying it.

But there’s more to be gleaned from looking into the young lady who wrote the piece.

A VICE News interview (in German) tells us that Julia Ebner is 25 years old. Despite her tender age she is Senior Researcher — not a senior researcher, mind you — at the Quilliam Foundation:

Julia Ebner is Senior Researcher at Quilliam Global and manages the FATE network in Europe. She leads Quilliam’s research on European terrorism prevention policies, far-right extremism and reciprocal radicalisation.


Julia holds an MSc (Dist) in International History from London School of Economics and an MSc (Dist) in International Relations from Peking University. Her research on Chinese politics was published by various think tanks such as The European Institute for Asian Studies and peer-reviewed journals such as Resources Policy. Julia speaks German, English, French, Spanish and Mandarin.

Her blurb at Quilliam led me to FATE, “Families Against Terrorism and Extremism”. According to FATE’s “About” page:

Welcome to FATE (Families Against Terrorism and Extremism), a family of organisations dedicated to bringing about a better future — by keeping families together. The threat posed by extremists and their narratives is tearing families apart. Too many of our sons, daughters, brothers and sisters have been lost to pointless and hateful ideologies. Enough is enough. It’s time to stand up to the hate.

Our aim is simple: to be there for each other. To stay strong. To make a difference in our communities and to keep our families together. From setting up and running CVE campaigns to hosting events and giving advice, FATE welcomes and works together with charities and organisations looking to turn the tide of recruitment and take a stand against extremism.

That is: we’re looking at a “Countering Violent Extremism” (CVE) operation, direct from the OIC/Muslim Brotherhood to Quilliam to The Guardian.

To get the flavor of the CVE meme, check out Ms. Ebner’s TEDx talk, “How far right and Islamist extremists amplify each other’s rhetoric”. You’ll notice that she has a fairly thick mitteleuropäische accent — she was born in Austria. In fact, she’s only been in London for two years. Nevertheless, despite her youth and her recent arrival in the Anglosphere, she’s Senior Researcher at the Quilliam Foundation.

How did that come about?

As mentioned in her bio at Quilliam, Ms. Ebner has an M.Sc. (Dist) from Beijing University. The following snip is from the Beijing University website:

a 2-year full-time academic program of MIR at the School of International Studies, a master’s degree in International Relations will be granted by Peking University upon completion of required credits, a degree thesis, and an oral defense

Two years, full-time. So out of her brief 25 years, she spent at least two years in China. The tuition fee for her program is RMB60,000 per year, which is about $10,000.

In 2014 Ms. Ebner wrote a briefing paper for the European Institute for Asian Studies (EIAS):

December 2014


Europe’s Rare Earth Dependence on China
Future Perspectives

By Julia Ebner

Julia Ebner is a Junior Researcher at the European Institute for Asian Studies

So she must have been studying in China 2012-2014, or even earlier, when she was 20-22 years old, or younger.

As a matter of interest, here’s a history of her school from the Beijing University info:

In 1960, the Department of Political Science was set up in Peking University. Three years later, the Department was renamed the Department of International Politics. From 1996 to 1998, the Department of International Politics, the Institute of International Relations and the Institute of Afro Asian Studies merged successively, and SIS was the final product of this merging process.

From the VICE interview, translation by Egri:

Q:   How did you get this job?
A:   In my master’s thesis in international history I wrote about women as suicide attackers. For it, I interviewed my now-boss. He is one of the most renowned experts in the field of Islamic terrorism and extremism. The interview was very fascinating, which is why I applied to the think tank.

This obviously refers to the master’s earned in London. Her “now-boss” is presumably Maajid Nawaz of the Quilliam Foundation.

Her graduate studies were focused on “political Islam, the emergence of the modern state of Iran and Chinese politics,” according to ZeeCompanion, which seems to be a UK-based network of “Asians”.

A more extensive CV may be found at RocketReach:

Junior Researcher @ European Institute for Asian Studies
Teacher at Chinese public and private high schools @ Alpha Partners Education
Consultant to the Knowledge and Innovation Department @ UNDP
Education Master of Science (MSc) in International Relations and Affairs, Distinction @ The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)
Master of Science (M.Sc.) in 国际关系, Distinction @ 北京大学
Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) in Philosophie, Distinction @ Universität Wien
Bachelor of Science (BSc) in Internationale Betriebswirtschaft, Merit @ Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien
Erasmus Exchange Semester in Distinction @ ESSEC Business School

Notes from Egri Nök:

She started off by studying Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Economics; that is what everyone in Germany and Austria studies if he knows he wants to make a career, but does not yet quite know how. Normally these people are completely apolitical. But there’s an Erasmus Exchange Semester — that is an EU organization, meant to strengthen the EU spirit.

She says the “Nazis” (that is, the Counterjihadists) need to be “fought online and offline.” People in Germany use sentences such as that as justifications to burn AfD cars, vandalize Pirincci’s home…

On German public TV in March of this year she commented on the vehicle jihad in London. She said what they always say: that the true goal of the “extremists” is to divide us from each other. She blames the right-extremists in Birmingham and all across Europe for the “Islamic extremists”, because they agree with each other in their “binary worldview”.

That’s the CVE narrative. To combat “extremism”, it’s necessary to take out the right-wing extremists, because their extremism feeds into and intensifies “Islamist extremism”.

It’s a shrewd tactic. And it’s been very effective so far.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

The above summary is just the tip of the iceberg concerning Julia Ebner, the Quilliam Foundation, and the Grauniad. Doughty sleuths may want to use these links to dig more deeply into the background and context of Ms. Ebner and her devotion to the CVE narrative.

4 thoughts on “The Guardian and the Quilliam Foundation Battle the “Far Right”

  1. The “Quilliam Foundation” has dropped the misleading second word, and rebranded itself as simply “Quilliam”. Set up with large helpings of taxpayer funds, it was not a foundation such as the Paul Mellon Foundation. One source online says it now receives funding from Kuwait.

    Billed as a “think tank”, its main role seems to be to deflect attention away from Islam, and provide handy soundbites for politicians and media. Maajid Nawaz promotes the wholly invented “Islamism” (nasty, dangerous) as distinct from Islam (by inference fine and dandy). “Islamism” is not found in any Islamic source, or any handbook of Sharia.

  2. “…any desire to impose anyone’s faith over anyone else is inherently flawed and must be challenged,” said Maajid Nawaz, of Quilliam.


    “whoever desires other than Islam as religion – never will it be accepted from him.”
    (Koran 3:85).
    “…fight them [non-muslims] until persecution is no more, and the “deen” [governance] is all for Allah”. 
    (Koran 8:39)
    “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.”
    (Koran 9:29)

    The Koran is quite clear about IMPOSING Islam on others, by force.

  3. The forces of globalism are so powerful they will be hard to stop. Time and time again German self loathing becomes a problem for us all.

Comments are closed.