Philippe de Villiers: “I Believe That France Will Become an Islamic Republic”

Philippe de Villiers is a French historian, author, and former MEP. He is among a small minority of French intellectuals in being a conservative Catholic — the great majority of intellectuals in France are atheists. Religious belief is frowned upon among French intellectuals even more than it is among their American counterparts.

The following interview with Mr. de Villiers took place last fall. In it you’ll hear him discuss the Islamization of France and the coming destruction of Europe. It is his conclusion that France has already surrendered to Islamization, and the completion of the process is only a matter of time.

The interview is in three parts. After the final part is a full transcript.

Many thanks to Ava Lon for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

    Transcript video 1
0:00   The French political class was bought by Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
0:04   Without a doubt? — As far as I’m concerned, no doubt.
0:08   Today we have no more right to talk about France. It is clear that they want to kill France,
0:12   because they say France is finished, it is a space in the cosmic market
0:16   — They make fun of France? — Yes. — They make fun of the French? — Yes, I am adamant:
0:21   They hate her. Because … France will become an Islamic republic …
0:25   In fact you go on the internet and you find everything about Bilderberg
0:28   and so on, Trilateral, I mean,
0:33   they are not conspiring! They have the power! Indeed Chirac,
0:37   Giscard (d’Estaing), Sarkozy, Hollande, to take four.
0:40   History — they don’t give a damn; history of France and world history.
0:45   Because these are marketing people, people of the moment.
0:50   — The history of France, they couldn’t care less, you say. Do they also not care about France?
0:54   Yes. — They couldn’t care less about France? — Yes.
0:57   They don’t care about the French, yes I am adamant.
1:00   They hate her. I’ll tell you, what they hate in her.
1:06   They hate Christianity.
1:10   Christian roots. Yes. That’s really it. You see?
1:14   Christian France is so present and so ancient,
1:21   and so it’s in its institutions, that it’s everywhere in the interstices,
1:26   including in Christmas crèches, we put into general council etc.
1:30   So it’s everywhere. You would have to eradicate all French literature and all the monuments,
1:36   for the stones to stop talking.
1:39   — A programmed Islamization of France?
1:43   Today we face two threats simultaneously:
1:50   The Americanization of the world, which is at the same time world’s commodification,
1:55   including the commodification of life. This is the venal body;
2:00   and the Islamization of the world.
2:05   Because France will become an Islamic republic,
2:10   for three reasons: the first is that Muslims are rediscovering the Koran
2:16   and the sunnah.
2:22   And so they come back to text.
2:26   In the text and in the history
2:33   the Islamic State is closer to the Koran than
2:37   the so-called moderate Muslims.
2:43   The Koran does not “moderate” you!
2:46   And in the Koran and in the Sunnah
2:51   the world is divided into two houses:
2:55   the house of Islam— Dar al-Islam —
2:58   and the house of war — Dar al-Harb.
3:03   The one who explained it best for me , the first one, for two and a half long hours
3:07   it was King Hassan II, who loved me very much and whom I loved.
3:10   In fact he said to me, “Oh I saw you on TV.
3:13   You are right about Maastricht. We are mare nostrum, [our sea, i.e. the Mediterranean].
3:17   It’s madness to take Europe to the north, because the more you pull to the north,
3:21   the more it will go west,
3:24   the more it will be Atlanticist. Because Anglo-Saxon Europe is Atlanticism.
3:28   It’s their tradition.” And then he told me:
3:32   “Do not believe for a moment that Moroccan Muslims
3:35   will become French Muslims!
3:40   No. Besides, I don’t want them to. I am the Emir of believers.
3:43   No. They belong to the Ummah.”
3:46   And he explained the Ummah, supra-nationality …
3:50   Not the super-, the supra-: there is only one nationality when one is Muslim.
3:54   “This is the Ummah. We belong to the community of believers.”
3:58   So detaching a Muslim from the community of believers is not easy.
4:01   Good. After that I met Magdi Allam, who was my neighbor in the European Parliament for five years.
4:09   He’s an Egyptian who converted to the Catholic faith.
4:15   and who was baptized by Pope Benedict XVI,
4:20   on one night in March 2008. There were four riflemen behind him for five years.
4:24   Four! Day and night . Four carabinieri. All right.
4:28   With guns at the ready, even in the bathroom.
4:32   And you know what happened? Everyone was turning their backs,
4:36   because we were… everyone was scared, actually. Because of him. And he told me:
4:39   “You know Philippe, the clash of civilizations I do not believe in it.”
4:42   I said: “Oh, really? Why?” “Because you’re going to roll over.”
4:45   So there was a fatwa on him. So I know what it is, someone who has a fatwa!
4:50   I’ve seen it, it was my friend, his name is Christiano in French, since he was baptized;
4:54   and he told me what Sharia was etc. He told me.
4:57   But a mosque is not a place of worship. It’s much more than that, of course!
5:00   So let’s not assimilate it with the Catho-centrism!
5:08   or a Catho-egocentrism, as if Islam were parallel to the Catholic faith.
5:15   It’s very different! And saying that, doesn’t mean criticizing Islam!
5:20   A mosque is not a church. Voilà!
5:23   Then after that I saw, ah, the famous Tariq Ramadan.
5:27   and I saw him, before me, exercising taqiyya.
5:32   The taqiyya this is actually the duty of Muslims to dissimulate the truth,
5:38   when they are a minority. Voilà!
5:43   And so we had a brief exchange before: at make-up and at the make-up removal.
5:47   and I said to him: “This is taqiyya.” Because he said the opposite of what he wrote, see?
5:51   But this is not a problem with respect to the Koran,
5:54   if you are a minority … voilà.
6:00   So the three reasons why I believe that France will become an Islamic republic:
6:06   The first reason is that it is the project of Islam;
6:10   That is to say that Islam is a peaceful religion AFTER the conquest, always!… not BEFORE!
6:18   — So it will obviously happen with the support of French politicians?
6:24   So the second reason is, that there is the fertility differential.
6:27   John Hume [ Northern Ireland Labour politician] said, speaking of Braudel [Fernand Braudel, historian],
6:31   he said: “You know, Braudel and I always thought that there’s only one thing that counts
6:35   in history, and it is the demographic waterline.” Voilà.
6:39   Here, in fact, they’re using demographic weapon.
6:43   I don’t remember who said one time,
6:46   and also Annie Laurent [French journalist and writer]. “Childbirth is the jihad of women”.
6:51   And then thirdly the spirit of dhimmitude:
6:55   making sure that we would have dhimmis here, yes, already!
6:58   So: we must explain that the dhimmis are semi-citizens.
7:01   There are Jews and Christians who are in the land of Islam
7:04   and who do not have civil rights and they pay a tax and are humiliated;
7:08   and they live like that. Yes. In order to survive. Voilà.
7:12   And so in fact, when I see Juppé [French politician]
7:15   for me, he’s not only physically incarnating a tax, but this guy,
7:19   he embodies the dhimmitude. When he said that scarves on buses, it’s fine with him, etc.,
7:24   halal menu and so on, anyway…
7:27   And one day he said: “I never read the Koran.”
7:32   So a French politician today,
7:35   with six or ten million Muslims, and who doesn’t read the Koran, is a fool!
7:40   Actually, what they want, is the Great Replacement [of people].
    Transcript video 2
7:44   This Islamization of the country, Philippe de Villiers,
7:47   isn’t it wanted and programmed by the French elites?
7:52   It is wanted. It is intended by the French elites.
7:55   The French political class was bought by Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
8:00   No doubt about it? — For me, no doubt.
8:04   This would be a topic, but there’s no time.
8:07   Otherwise we have no time to address your questions.
8:10   Yes, this is obvious. Yes. France no longer belongs to itself, is no longer independent.
8:14   The French ruling class is a class of subjects and dhimmis.
8:20   It is subject to America with NATO,
8:26   and tomorrow, to an economic NATO, with a future transatlantic treaty.
8:30   And so we were lied to, when we were told about “Europe-power” in Maastricht.
8:34   There is no “Europe-power”. The European power is America: the fifty-first star on the American flag,
8:39   and they [the French politicians] are a class of dhimmis, in fact they are collaborators.
8:44   [When Philippe de Villiers assists unwittingly … in a meeting of the Trilateral Commission in the European Parliament]
8:51   So first, actually, why I’m here, at the European Parliament, that day? Because I’m a candidate
8:58   [unintelligible], I must sign in, and I do not have my quota of days, so with one of my friends,
9:05   named Christophe Baudouin, who is a great friend,
9:08   who is a great thinker on sovereignist Europe,
9:13   we go there and we arrive in the VIP Lounge of the European Parliament.
9:18   I have nothing to do there, but, with my starry badge, I get in
9:23   and I find myself in a room full of bow ties and tuxedos.
9:27   I meet a lot of familiar faces, but also many unknown ones.
9:32   I meet… I see… I recognize Kissinger, for example
9:36   Brzezinski; So there are many Americans.
9:41   and then there’s the famous Sutherland, Goldman Sachs,
9:44   [Peter Sutherland, the UN representative for migration, wants the nations to abandon all sovereignty.]
9:47   and then there’s Anne Lauvergeon [French businesswoman, aka “Atomic Anne”],
9:50   there’s obviously the inevitable Jean-Claude Trichet [2003-2011 president of the ECB],
9:55   responsible for his apostolic mission of the Euro-bliss,
10:00   some journalists, and the big bankers, big business leaders…
10:05   no, not business leaders, I’m sorry: top managers,
10:09   and then Eurocrats, UN people, etc.
10:14   — There’s what, three-four hundred people? — 400 people
10:17   — You are in this room, to begin with, they don’t escort you out?
10:21   — … because you’re not invited? — No, but I entered with my badge,
10:25   and I am spotted at some point by Barroso [President of the European Commission, 2004-2014],
10:29   but he doesn’t dare! Because he doesn’t know exactly where he’s setting foot. He’s thinking to himself,
10:35   “What is HE doing here?” but at the same time, well, anyway… — But he doesn’t do anything? No, he doesn’t!
10:38   And I hear the speeches. And in fact, listen to me, at the beginning I did not know this is the Trilateral.
10:43   [Opaque Powers of the Trilateral. Executives of multinationals, governments of rich countries and supporters of economic liberalism quickly understood that they had to work together if they wanted to impose their worldview. By July 1973, in a then “bipolar” world, David Rockefeller launches the Trilateral Commission, which will mark the starting point of modern ideological war. Less publicized than the Davos forum, it is still very active, through a network of influences with multiple ramifications.]
10:44   And this is what I hear:
10:47   first, it’s the ideal of the fusion of economics and politics
10:53   Unbelievable! All right. Arrow on politics. No more politics!
10:59   Politics is what prevents societies from being happy. — That’s what you hear?
11:06   It’s time to become consumers! Second, the need to merge the two liberalisms:
11:09   economic and societal; and there they speak about the progress of gay marriage.
11:13   In the entire world. Bosses! Managers!
11:17   From large companies? — People who make the economy!
11:20   But, you see? They don’t forget that! All right.
11:23   Don’t forget that the European Parliament invited Conchita Wurst [transgender singing star]
11:25   [Philippe de Villiers, a former secretary of state, former MEP, author of “The time has come to say what I saw” Éditions Albin Michel]
11:29   The man became … the bearded lady, etc., yes,
11:32   UN also, etc. And then they talk
11:36   about the need for preparing public opinion
11:40   for what would be called Trans-Oceania.
11:44   So I realized later that it was the famous Transatlantic Treaty,
11:50   which will make Europe an appendix market to the US market,
11:54   with the end of borders and customs,
11:58   The end of the controlled labels; and the Arbitral Tribunal
12:01   which they talked about on that day, as of 2007!
12:04   An Arbitral Tribunal allowing large non-national companies
12:10   to sue countries, to claim reparations, meaning
12:15   a private Arbitral Tribunal, above all public powers.
12:20   And that’s what’s being put in place. Who’s talking about it?!
12:24   So therefore there … then, there is the Bilderberger Group, born earlier,
12:29   in fact in 1964, and is a kind of vanguard,
12:35   where they are fewer, but equally offensive.
12:41   And then there is one thing that surprised me: one day I learn that Francois Fillon [PM 2007-2012],
12:47   French Prime Minister, and Alain Juppé, one year later, were approved
12:51   by the Bilderberg group. And when I asked Fillon: “How can you go to something like that?”
12:55   He said: “What do you want? They are the ones who govern us!”
13:00   Francois Fillon told you that? — Yes. The nice Fillon.
13:05   So yes, voilà! All right! Later I found out, in fact the European Parliament, much later —
13:12   because I’ve never been into this conspiracy stuff etc. —
13:18   and in fact, on the internet you have everything on Bilderberg, the Trilateral;
13:24   therefore, I say, they’re not conspiring: they have the power!
13:28   Voilà! And so you have the national political class
13:31   And above it, the invisible super-class,
13:35   whom the national political class obeys. Voilà.
13:39   And what you have to understand, is that it all started in 1968,
13:43   in May 1968, with the birth of “boboisme”. “Bobo” is a hybrid
13:48   that inherits from America a new economic and social model.
13:51   And societal, sorry, no limits, no boundaries.
13:56   Libertarian capitalism. And actually libertarian capitalism
14:03   prefers homosexuals over heterosexuals —
14:08   from the slogan “double income, no kid.”
14:13   Dual income, no kids, and starting in the 1970s, which was explained to me by
14:18   Cohn-Bendit [French-German communist] — This is what you say… — my neighbor in the European Parliament,
14:24   who was also at the center of the mysticism, symbolically,
14:29   emblematically, the center of gravity of the European Parliament;
14:34   True, he wasn’t denying it, the boboiste is the bourgeois-bohemian [like yuppies, lefties].
14:39   Actually, it is the alliance of liberal and libertarian,
14:46   meaning, the idea that the big companies
14:52   need new markets, new appetites, new clients;
14:55   so we need to transform the world into a planetary mass market
14:59   and transform the citizens into compulsive consumers.
15:03   And by the way: the political class ended up being swallowed up by the supermarkets
15:07   by the supermarket; I mean, I remember a socialist from marketing,
15:12   who was saying, in front of me, to Michel Noir [French pol], who was preparing “the moment of truth” [TV show]
15:17   “You have to be like a yogurt from the supermarket: a creamy heart, and the bottom close to cover!”
15:21   And the guy says: “Good, ah, yes, OK!” I mean, they actually asked a politician to be a yogurt, you see,
15:27   with the expiration date, bonus or reward points etc.
15:30   So, consumerism has brought hedonism,
15:35   and political hedonism took politics away from the people, voilà!
15:41   That’s where we are today.
15:45   So therefore the media system in fact, isn’t at all, not in the slightest,
15:48   a communication system; so if that’s your question, I will answer you:
15:51   This is a selection system; as you keep coming across lies,
15:56   You must understand that, and I address myself to your viewers,
16:00   as you keep coming across lies, you end up feeling contaminated
16:06   in people’s eyes; and you end up with a wounded soul.
16:12   At the end you are a kind of ambulatory lie by omission.
    Transcript video 3
16:18   François Hollande, “a plant without soil…”
16:25   He does what he can with the resources he has.
16:28   He’s an “énarque” [a graduate of the École Nationale d’Administration]
16:32   The ENA produces social engineers.
16:36   He passed the test, he succeeded.
16:41   He never learned anything anywhere. He really is a plant without soil.
16:48   I often feel sorry for him, because he has to realize that he’s overwhelmed.
16:54   You are saying it with a mixture of sadness and affection.
16:58   Yes. It must be very hard.
17:03   And at the same time he should have the courage to say to the country:
17:08   “I can’t.” — To conclude, Philippe de Villiers, you were saying before
17:13   that the Islamization of France would happen,
17:16   that Islam would come to power.
17:19   How you see things turning around?
17:23   If Islam were to come to power, is there any glimpse of hope after that?
17:27   Well, I will answer you, but first I need to say this,
17:31   because when I confide things like that, there’s always this lady, in the room, who stands up and says:
17:36   “Ah, it’s all very pessimistic! We really need hope!…”
17:41   I say “Come on! If we were in 1938,
17:45   I was told how it was, right? Well, we need hope, all right,
17:49   but there is Hitler, there’s all that!” So there you can see very well
17:55   what’s going on in the world. OK.
17:58   I observed the Manif for All.[French rallies against gay marriage in 2013] I have seen young people.
18:01   I saw their faces. I thought to myself “They are not the same!”
18:05   There are starting to understand that you can be in the right even if you’re in the minority.
18:11   Soon they’ll understand that we must fight
18:16   in the name of natural law and the survival of our country,
18:20   fight by becoming conscientious objectors.
18:24   we must revolt, we must become the resistance.
18:29   And this is where the conversation, which marked me so much, takes place.
18:33   With Alexander Solzhenitsyn, we’re in Tambov, we’re walking.
18:36   Suddenly he stops and says: “We, we will recover, [Eastern Europe and Russia] but you [the West], you’ll slip
18:39   into a deep abyss, because you have the disease of emptiness. You will experience an eclipse of intelligence.
18:45   You are at the last stage, the final stage of spiritual exhaustion.
18:50   And one day, fireflies will come out of that great catacomb,
18:54   carried by dissidents.” — The dissidents? I answered.
19:00   “Yes, the dissidents. Let me explain who the ‘dissidents’ are.
19:04   Dissident is like the ‘refuseniks’, [refused permission to emigrate from the USSR], under the cape,
19:08   they have samizdat, criticizing the Soviet system
19:11   they go to jail, the gulag,
19:15   and at some point, the prisons are too small.
19:19   and they save the honor and freedom of Russia.
19:23   Well, I’m telling you, today dissidents are in the East,
19:27   they will move to the West. “
19:30   I contemplated this sentence, and one day
19:33   I said: — “I am writing this book!”
19:36   Because I cited this sentence to a friend, a very close one,
19:40   I said, voilà, Solzhenitsyn told me: “Dissidents are in the East, they will move to the West”
19:44   he said: — “You must write this book!”
19:47   So what does that mean?
19:50   Two things: the dissidents, they will emerge,
19:54   out of the water, because they have two unique qualities:
19:59   the first is courage, and the second is lucidity.
20:05   The courage: they’ll dare to cross the hygienic perimeter:
20:10   forbidden words. At the risk of prison.
20:14   They’ll go to jail. But the prisons are too small.
20:19   Because they [the dissidents] will give such an example of so much strength
20:22   that everyone will want to go to jail:
20:25   to help them, to support them, to associate with their courage.
20:29   And the second thing, the second original quality is lucidity.
20:35   I say in my book, voilà, I saw politicians,
20:40   the globalized elites, tearing down the load-bearing walls.
20:44   It will be therefore necessary to rebuild the load-bearing walls: this is what the dissidents will do.
20:47   Load-bearing walls, it’s simple.
20:50   This is: 1. The sanctity of life,
20:53   2. Affiliation as a benchmark,
20:58   3. The nation as heritage, 4. The border as anchorage,
21:02   5. And there would be the French language as the window to the world.
21:05   Voilà. So Lenin, that Solzhenitsyn quoted often.
21:13   gave us the method. “Give me 1,000 men,” he said
21:18   So me, if I have a thousand readers,
21:21   Among the hundred thousand or two hundred thousand
21:24   who understand this book and use it as their handy guide,
21:29   a kind of indicator to go out into the light, I will have accomplished my mission.
21:35   Voilà. And as you could see, I hope.
21:39   There is no malice in what I said about politicians;
21:43   Rather, I have compassion for them.
21:50   First, because most of them are illiterate;
21:59   illiterate concerning France, even if they are highly educated,
22:05   and secondly, because it’s the system
22:08   that had placed in their chest a stone instead of a heart.

76 thoughts on “Philippe de Villiers: “I Believe That France Will Become an Islamic Republic”

  1. It is remarkable that even a French conservative catholic who understands full well the grave, colossal danger that islam represents for Western Civilization simply cannot bring himself to abandon the cheap shots against ‘Americanization’. That he even seems to label it as a problem on a par with global islamization.

    I have never understood that. Never. I assume that with ‘Americanization’ he means, principally, the spreading of popular American culture and American ‘jingoism’.

    Personally, I only took from the former what I liked – movies, food (fastfood), rock, literature etc – and what I didn’t like I discarded. Can’t see what can be wrong with this kind of Americanization. The fact that I like/liked, say, some summer blockbusters, Dean Koontz novels and Big Mac menus (from time to time, that is), NEVER stopped me feeling proud about my Flemish ancestry, my Flemish Heritage.

    As for the US’s ‘jingoism’ – to me it’s always been crystal clear that without it the world would be an infinitely worse place.

    • Actually, the horrible truth right now is that the USA is pushing the Islamization of Europe. We are leaders of the NWO process, part of which is to install Islam as a method of breaking down the old order and imposing global rule.

      You’ll find American fingerprints all over the Islamization of Europe. Hillary Clinton was right in there helping the Ikhwan do it.

      • That is the tragedy. American PTB (powers that be) have for example insisted on the European economic sanctions against Russia, even though it’s been ruinous to the various economies. Some manage to sell some of their produce to Russia “under the table.” But mostly it has been ruinous, most Europeans don’t agree with it, and yet it is enforced. I do believe American pressure is behind it.

        Perhaps the U.S. PTB have concluded that in order to stay top dog, they have to ruin Europe. It makes no sense to me. But then…

      • The ghastly truth is that Islam is unstoppable by anything short of the Last Judgement.

        • The EU is finished. Brexit saw to that. And Islam is very stoppable. The People do not want it, nor respect it. Indeed they despise it and I see a new class of “anti Semitism” coming to the fore. I predicted a decade ago that Islam would end up totally despised. The real Far Right is on the rise and a new “Holocaust” in the offing, all thanks to these globalist “Progressive” ignoramuses and arrogance unsurpassed in history. None of this was necessary. What amazes me is the utter ignorance and shallowness of these morons. They are historically stupid.

          Sutherland reminds me of an oversized slug.

          • My wife pours salt on them to stop them eating the flowers in her garden.

          • Islam is easily stopped, because it is fiction. Once the people of the World know that Islam was invented by Caliph Abd al-Malik to advance Arab Imperialism then it is all over.

            The TRUTH is the most powerful weapon against Islam. Although airpower is a close second 🙂

            Learn the Truth, that Islam is the Scientology of the Dark Ages, created by evil men to enslave other men and, especially, women:
            “An Historical Critique of Islam’s Beginning”

            As long as people keep pretending that Islam is somehow true and that Mohammed was somehow more than a mythological figure, then Islam will not be defeated. Once we state the truth, that Islam is fiction, then we will win.

          • The real question is, do the people have the capability to stop Islam? Without a total conviction of the truth of the Christian faith and of the need to fight and kill in its defense, the people won’t be able to sustain the will to fight for as long as it takes, and to sacrifice whatever it takes, for final victory.

          • Bishop-

            I hope that you are correct.

            If the West cannot develop the will to save itself in short order we are in very deep trouble.

          • Bishop,

            I’m happy to see you in a guardedly optimistic mood. The last posting I remember from you was decidedly defeatist and pessimistic.

        • Unstoppable?! Haha! Muslims are like an out of control bunch of crackheads who have been ALLOWED to act out and build their crack houses everywhere rather than be treated as the freaks and rubbish they really are. Brexit step one.

      • According to the german publisher kopp-verlag, Germany are now flying in immigrants or “refugees” from Egypt, Turkey and Greece by night! From the airport (Hannover, I think it is) they are transported secretly in buses to refugee centers. At the same time they lie to us about the number of immigrants coming in to Europe. It is clear to me now, if it wasn’t before: They are really creating a new european people, and they are doing it faster than I could ever have imagined. We are going to be “phased out”.

      • I think that the anti-Americanism is actually partly the cause: they hate Americans so much that whatever “else” must be good. First the Soviets, and now that those are gone, the Islamists. They think “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” – without realising that Americans aren’t their enemy.

          • Even if Trump gets in, a long bureaucratic civil war will be required to get rid of the traitors and would-be tyrants.

            Obama was able to slip easily into the driver’s seat because the vehicle had been designed for someone precisely like him. The permanent government — the top managers who are not political appointees — are overwhelmingly NWO/multiculti/globalist/cultural Marxist in their thinking. They are the ones who run the show, while the elected pols come and go.

            Hillary would be their preferred president, obviously. But they could have made do with Bernie, Biden, Jeb, Rubio, or any number of others. But not Trump — they will fight tooth and nail against him, even more so than they did against Reagan, because The Donald is not one of the Anointed.

      • No Baron! This is foreign powers and corporations. The American People are simply victims like the rest of us.

        • I was agreeing with you! Our government is evil, not our people. Many of our people are foolish and ignorant, though — that’s how they came to have an evil government.

          • Spot on, Baron! And I get the horrible feeling that those same American people, having now found they made a huge mistake re the first black president, are now about to try the first female president. We’ll see.

      • Now c’mon Baron, I would rephrase that sentence as “the democratic party (and the ‘democratic’ president) is pushing the Islamization of Europe”. Plus, what happens here happens on your side of the pond just as well, only you are some 15-20 years “behind”.

        • If you think the Democrats are the problem, then you don’t understand what’s going on here. We have a UniParty. It has two divisions, and they pretend to be radically different from each other, but they aren’t. They stage political theater every 2 years, with the big show every four years, where they have mock battles over certain issues that are allowed to be discussed and on which people are permitted to differ. But neither party allows its apparatchiks to deal with certain core elements of the Program, e.g. mass immigration, globalism, and fiat money.

          The Democrat Division has permanent control. The Republican Division is the permanent “opposition”, and is allocated certain fiefdoms and perquisites to make it a compliant partner in the UniParty.

          Trump pulled back the curtain on this nasty little operation. He talked about things that you are not allowed to talk about. That’s why the Republicans came down so hard on him — no one in the UniParty is allowed to seriously consider closing the southern border. It is simply NOT allowed.

          That’s just a short summary of the situation. Much more can be said.

          The III Percenters over at WRSA have a saying: “We can’t vote our way out of this one.”

          • Baron, I am very much aware of the Republican ESTABLISHMENT’s basic alliance with the democrats, but from there to brand the entire GOP as being in league with the democrats…

            That’s a wholly different game of ball.

            Trust your judgment though.

          • The establishment controls the bulk of the party via access to major donors. If you don’t stay in the corral, you don’t get major funding for your re-election campaign.

            There are many exceptions, of course. For example, Reps. Louie Gohmert (TX) and Trent Franks (AZ) have strong support in their districts, which gives them the flexibility to buck the party line. But the entire leadership of the party serves the NWO, just like the Democrats. About 95% of those rascals need to be thrown out ASAP.

      • Baron-

        I have been reading the excellent “Catastrophic Failure,” and just last night I read through the passages detailing how Hillary Clinton helped pass sharia-compliant UN resolutions curtailing freedom of speech during her time as Secretary of State.

        These actions alone should disqualify her as a candidate for the Presidency.

        • Raspailwasright:

          Catastrophic Failure is indeed an excellent and complete source on Islam and its doctrine of aggression. It is heavy on Sunni theology, but the Shi’ite is even crazier. For an exposition on the Shi’ite theology, look to The Complete Infidel’s Guide to Iran

          The big problem is not that the information is not available, but that huge swaths of the electorate doesn’t know and doesn’t care. Clinton’s criminal actions are widely known. Hillary is smart enough to stay just this side of an indictment. Other than that, the accusations, even to the extent they get repeated in the press, are simply games. Around 50% of the electorate doesn’t care in the least, and the election may hinge on turnout of pro-Trump versus Democratic voters.

          Hillary did slip up with the emails, as her conscious use of a non-secure server for top secret information was well within the definition of the criminal espionage statute. But the fix was publicly in, and the 50% of the electorate still didn’t care.

          • RonaldB-

            Thank you for the tips!

            I agree that huge swathes of the electorate do not know and do not care. I think our controlled media has done a masterful job of brainwashing them into this mode of thinking.

            What deeply troubles me is the sophistication and the thoroughness of the media jihad the OIC and other Ummah entities are waging against us. We in the West are supposed to be highly educated and resistant to this sort of silver-tongued manipulation, but so far we seem to be falling for it hook, line, and sinker!!!

      • “the horrible truth”
        One small example- the so-called ‘Rivkin Doctrine’, despite the diplomatic language of ‘democratic involvement’ and the
        “expansion of inter-communal and inter-faith exchanges at the local level; decrease in popular support for xenophobic political parties and platforms.”
        In reality we all know this means vilifying and opposing the Front National, while stirring up the Banilieues- with the blessing of the current French State it has to be said.

        Hollande received 93% of the Muslim vote, the deciding votes in the election- so the Socialists are happy with the ‘democratic involvement’ (achieved in no small way with populist inducements of amnesty and votes for undocumented Muslims)

        The hypocrisy and subversion is off the scale but protestations don’t cut it anymore, if they ever did, this is a hostile take-over of France and of Europe, with the collusion of modern-day Vichy like Hollande and the liberal consensus of the EU, as represented by Merkel; all with the backing of the USA and funding of the Gulf-States.

        The Czech President is obviously a man, who prefers safe rather than sorry;
        “Urges Citizens To Arm Themselves, Fight Terrorists, Close Borders”
        The Visigrad Four are shaping up to be the Maquis of Eurabia.

    • USA is very good friend with islamic powers such as Saudi Arabia and Quatar.
      One word: oil.

      • Oil.

        This is old hat. As Trump points out, with modern oil exploration and extraction methods, the North American continent has more oil reserves than the Middle East. It is money, and not oil, that lubricates the subversion of traditional America and Europe.

    • Outlaw Mike-

      As an American, I thank you for your reasoned and nuanced approach to the export of American culture. I wish more non-Americans saw things this way, instead of a black/white dichotomy.

      That said, as an American, I hope I never live on a planet where I could fly to Bulgaria, or Bali and see nothing but McDonald’s restaurants.

      I also think that Mr. de Villiers has a point with the regard to commodification of everything in life, but I think that is more a function of Corporatization than Americanization per se.

  2. – The part about Solzhenitsyn is striking. He will prove to be correct.
    – It is one thing to be invaded by a superior culture. It is another to be taken over by a bunch of illiterates who bring nothing but retrogression.

    • M. de Villiers: “…the system that had placed in their chest a stone instead of a heart.”

      C.S. Lewis also foresaw this in the late 1930s/early 1940s. The phrasing is so close to Lewis’s that I feel sure M. de Villiers has read Lewis’s work, “The Abolition of Man.” On-line PDF available at:

      I only learned of the existence of this prophetic work in Fall 2015, but am now doing what I can to widen knowledge thereof.

  3. The French hostility to America, exemplified by the fact that even a conservative, nationalist, Catholic such as Phillipe de Villiers indulges in such nonsense, is rooted in French national humiliation – a humiliation that began in 1815. The French simply cannot adjust to the reality that they are no longer a world power, which they were prior to 1815. They hated Pax Brittanica and now they hate Pax Americana. Hence the jabs by de Villiers at “Americanization”.

    The supreme irony is that De Gaulle sought to make France “great” again by reaching out to the Islamic world and allying with it. He thought that by making France the leader of a third bloc – France and the MENA nations – in contradistinction to the US bloc and the Soviet bloc, he would resurrect France as a presence on the world stage. Whereas all his strategy achieved is the slow destruction of France, a phenomenon we have all been witnessing since the “carbequeues” of 2005.

    So whilst France is doomed by Islamification, even intelligent Frenchmen still see the USA as the “bad guy” on the world stage. Weird stuff.

    • You’re taking De Villers’ saying a little bit to much on the first level or a personal attack. He’s talking facts.

    • My assumption – he is sincere in his what he said. His reference to gay marriage gives him some credibility to me because after that stories that occurred over the past years I have basically left with one recurring question – WHY? So when a company like Target says use the restroom you want and sticks to it and all of these companies and performers do the same and try to pressure people to accept it, I have a credible reason why. I guess whether they see the USA as the bad guy depends on where they are standing. If the USA is the hands and feet of some bad guys what does that make the US? What monster ever thought they were bad? This is all very discouraging because it tells me pressure is not being applied in the right places.

    • In the 1960’s, when President Lyndon Johnson had not yet jumped full-bore into the disaster of Vietnam, which cost 58,000 American and over 1,000,000 Vietnamese lives, De Gaulle sent a messenger to Johnson. The messenger reminded Johnson of the 75,000 French casualties in Vietnam.

      Johnson chose to not heed De Gaulle’s warning, but I am eternally grateful to the French for the attempt. And De Gaulle was viewed as anti-American.

      • There was a story, which I can’t verify, that when de Gaulle wanted to leave NATO, he demanded that all US troops be withdrawn from French soil by a particular date. LBJ is said to have asked, “Does that include the ones who are buried in it?”

  4. Al Amerika…The Hand of Death. The Great Satan and Little Satan-UK

    Absolutely evil personified.

    • Unbelievably, this novel was published in France (“Soumission”) either the day before or the day of the Charlie Hebdo attack in January 2015. Dear God.

      • More than a day before . Charlie Hebdo had time to publish an issue with the cover mocking Houellebecq.

  5. I wonder if you could give anyone–like, for example, the European elites–such a wonderful life, such unbearable lightness of being, such financial, physical, emotional and health security and such luxuriousness in their environments, that they would begin to turn nasty and rotten just for the simple purpose of experiencing excitement and evil, to feel they are struggling and accomplishing normal human goals and toils.

    Aren’t we supposed to struggle? Has European life become too easy for the elites?

    Is it possible that we would all turn into dysfunctional Merkels if life were easy enough?

  6. Well somebody should start compiling a list of the invisible elite. Voting, uprising, revolt, civil war all be pointless if the real enemy off to the side is left intact. Does this make George Soros an ambitious wannabe or someone doing their own thing? Is he just someone for people to be distracted by? I thought his comments about business pushing gay marriage reflected reality and the same with the transgender issues.

  7. Obviously Merkel and her accomplices in Germany have also been bought and paid for. I would like to know what was their price, what persuaded them to betray their own fellow-countrymen in such a devastating way? More than that, I would like to know who Frau Merkel takes her orders from.

  8. I think this french guy is mentally a little bit confused. Maybe he did visit some event with such speakers, but if this would have been a real secret conspiration, I doubt that just showing some plaquettes would have been enough to let him in.

    The interviewer also did a bad job. For example he did not ask the central question why all those french elite guys, which are according to Villiers are “bribed by SA”, do think, in his opinion, that they and their children can somehow escape an islamized europe without forced to convert.

    And all this nonsense about consume and creating a planetary race of customers. Firstly our formidable economy is based on consumation of stuff, the more the better, so there is nothing wrong about planetwide consumers. Secondly, moslems are not the ideal consumers. Their backwards mentality and bad working morale bring an economy down and dont fuel it. Thats no secret, so a conspiracy to create a european or planetwide consumer race which is centered on islam makes absolutely no sense.

  9. The idiot governments of 1914-1918 France (9%), Germany (9%), Austro-Hungary (8%) and UK (5%) began losing their Christian faith after those percentages of their total male population were killed. Of that total male population roughly treble that quantity to account for the amount of their best and brightest young men lost to senseless slaughter. Twenty one years later the French were the first to have lost their faith in Jesus along with the will to fight for their country and handed it over to the Germans. The Germans went on to lose another 50% of their young men and entirely lost their Christian faith.

    Even if all Muslims were to vanish overnight – Europe would find some other method of offing themselves. They follow no religion and want a whitewashed EU identity.

    The US should withdraw from NATO, remove troops from all combat zones, strengthen internal security and return to its Christian roots in order for future generations to survive.

    • As an atheist, I don’t quite see your prescription of Christianity to solve problems, although I emphatically have no problem with a Christian resurgence. Atheists are perfectly safe with Christians.

      Other than that, I agree with you completely on the disaster of World War I. The marriage of total, unrelenting war with weapons of mass slaughter selected against the best, brightest, and most courageous elements of the German, French, and British populations. The ones who were left were the slackers and the dullards.

      It is quite possible that a religious belief system impels one to fight for one’s cause. Again, in an era of mass slaughter, that character trait won’t stay around very long. Paradoxically, those wanting a religious revival would do well to develop strategies protecting the lives of those who would give up their lives for a cause.

      • I do not agree that atheists are safe with Christians. And certainly not safe with Christians like de Villiers. We have Christian friends who would not dream of trying to impose their Christian inspired morality on others but de Villiers would outlaw gay marriage if he had the power. I just don’t see what skin it is of anybody’s nose if gays get married and have the same rights as heterosexuals.
        People did not fight for Christianity against Hitler. The Germans were still on the whole Christians. They fought for the freedom of their nations.

  10. There is reason for hope. Brexit showed us that. The hope is that the disengaged masses rise up and reject the elites. We are already seeing some of that with political parties of the right rising in popularity. But it will take more than politicians, it will require mass protests of the type last seen when the communist states fell.

    • I agree that the Brexit vote was a breath of fresh air. Unfortunately, the UK divided along clear regional lines in its Remain/Leave voting such that a unified, “free” Britain may be impossible to achieve.

      Perhaps Scotland (and…gulp…Northern Ireland) could then un-unify the United Kingdom and rejoin the EU (gag…)? God, I hope not.

  11. Aside from all that, Philippe de Villiers? De Villiers? Could it be that one of his ancestors is the famous Philippe de Villiers de l’Isle Adam, the heroic defender of Rhodos? Now THERE is an example to emulate!

  12. “An Arbitral Tribunal allowing large non-national companies to sue countries, to claim reparations, meaning a private Arbitral Tribunal, above all public powers.”

    These sorts of powers have been reported in the media as being part of the provisions in the Trans Pacific Partnership free trade agreement. It would allow foreign multinational companies to sue individual sovereign countries if their governments tried to limit the business activities of those companies in those countries that are signatories to the TPP.

    In other words TPP undermines the national sovereignty of member countries.

    • Exactly. Our courts are left in second place to these “arbitration” panels of faceless international–what?–thieves.

    • “TPP undermines the national sovereignty of member countries”

      This should come as no surprise, although I compliment you for pointing that out.

      Every globalist organization, the UN, EU, TPP, International Court of Human Justice has as its objective the subvention of national law and prerogatives in favor of international law. This is one reason why general international treaties and organizations are so dangerous.

      • Quite true. And this is the reason the elites from the Left and Right both oppose Trump. He has already committed the cardinal sin of opposing “Free Trade”, immigration, NATO, all the precious Internationalist schemes of the Bilderberg Group and Trilateral Commission. Trump’s not their man (or woman;Hillary is) and they are mad as hell!
        And that is the context of this election.

  13. The educated so-called are in fact the new illiterates. We are up Islan Creek without a padlock.

  14. Hullo,
    Just a little note
    at 4.32 (first video) “y compris dans l’hémicycle,” should be translated as :”inside the debating chamber of the European Parliament”, not the bathroom.
    I thought I’d mention it as it is a big difference.

    I also would like to say that Philippe de Villiers is a man of honour, intelligence and integrity and it is true that the “men of no qualities” who serve as politicians in France have been bought by the Arabs.
    Here is a petition to try and stop a government minister from selling part of our French heritage to the Qatari.
    Should anybody want to sign it, I will happily translate the text.
    France is being sold one little piece at a time.

  15. If I may, so that the meaning of some sentences might be clearer:

    At 19.54: “les dissidents vont sortir du lot”(et non pas sortir de l’eau), hence: dissidents will stand out from the rest/will make themselves known and not “they will come out of the water”.
    At 20.02: ” périmètre sanitaire”: not hygienic perimeter but: “cordon sanitaire”.

    Dear Baron/Dymphna,
    I hope it’s OK to offer some slight corrections, they may remain anonymous if you prefer it that way

  16. It is the stated goal of the cult of islam to either convert every non-believer to islam, or kill them. How can any civilization pretend that these savages are welcome, and let them into their nations, homes, and businesses? It truly defies fact, logic, and reason, which is a very good definition of insanity. The people responsible for the truly insane political action of multiculturalism are those on the left, who believe that what they actually see, hear, and experience is not real, or will change, despite knowing that for more than one thousand years, the savage cult of islam has always been precisely the same; a murderous, violent, depraved cult of death for any non-believer. Europe has witnessed several assaults by this cult since its inception, causing untold millions of deaths. Yet, still, they welcome these violent savages into their countries, as we, here in the USA are doing. The politicians, who are so blinded by their ideological gods of diversity, equality, and multiculturalism, are all leftist socialists, who would sooner see the people and nations that they are pledged to defend and support, surrender to the savages, and join them in their depravity, rather than witness their ideological gods dissolve. That is an insane sickness, which only voters can cure by throwing leftist/socialists out of office via the vote, despite all of the lies, obfuscations, and omissions by the media in support of their shared socialist gods. To enlighten and arouse enough voters to accomplish this is a near impossibility.

  17. Nathalie, Thank you for those notes.
    I’d like to add, as someone who watches these videos to brush up on his French and German, if it is not too much trouble for the translators, I would really appreciate it if the original-language transcripts were also made available.

    • Unfortunately, that’s not generally possible. The translators work from a video, which they translate into English in bursts of 3-5 seconds. In this process there is never a transcript in the original language — it goes directly from the spoken word to English.

      To add a requirement for a transcript of the original would be too much. It’s not something that I could ask of a translator, who is already doing difficult, dedicated volunteer work in her spare time to produce the timed English translation.

      • Thank you for the explanation. I assumed they had made a transcript first. I have done video translation from Japanese to English, and due to the grammatical topology, you *have to* make a transcript; you usually can’t translate in bursts of 3 to 5 seconds.

Comments are closed.