The Office for the Protection Against Hans-Georg Maaßen


Dr. Hans-Georg Maaßen is the former head of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution in Germany — the state intelligence service. He is now the president of the Values Union (WerteUnion), a non-profit organization whose motto is “Freiheit statt Sozialismus” (“Freedom instead of Socialism”).

I’ve posted several times in the past about Dr. Maaßen (most recently here, earlier posts: #1, #2, #3, #4). He says commonsensical things about immigration and Islamization, which has made him the target of official scrutiny by his former agency. It looks like he has become an Enemy of the State.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Tichys Einblick. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

The Office for the Protection of the Constitution is monitoring Hans-Georg Maaßen

The state is mobilizing against the opposition. Germany’s domestic secret service is rolling out heavy guns against the head of the Union of Values, Hans-Georg Maaßen. The justification for the office is downright silly. Maaßen himself speaks of an “attack on the free, democratic basic order”.

The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution lists its former president Hans-Georg Maaßen as a so-called “observation case”. This is stated in an official decision from the authority, which has now been officially sent to Maaßen’s lawyers and which Maaßen himself published [PDF].

This confirms information from TE from last week. The current head of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, Thomas Haldenwang (CDU), had already announced in a background conversation with journalists that his office had “parts of the Union of Values and the fraternities” spied on.

Haldenwang said at the meeting: First you look at Twitter, then you create a file — and then you carry on.

Formally, the domestic secret service has now at least created the conditions for using intelligence resources against its former boss. With the approval of the so-called “G10 Commission” of the Bundestag, Maaßen’s correspondence could then even be monitored and his telephone tapped.

The background is the enormously expanded options that the Office for the Protection of the Constitution has been given against so-called “delegitimizers of the state”. Practically anyone who criticizes state institutions or people in state office may now be considered (and prosecuted) as such.

The first three reasons given by the office itself for classifying Maaßen as an observation case show how arbitrarily the Office for the Protection of the Constitution acts in this regard:

1.   The right-wing extremist Bernhard Schaub described Maaßen as a “staunch Republican” in a letter to a friend.
2.   So-called Reich citizens shared videos of Maaßen on their Facebook pages.
3.   In a TV broadcast, Maaßen described the actions of the security authorities against the “Rollator Coup” by alleged Reich citizens as “disproportionate”.
 

That’s no joke. That’s really what it says.

In Germany in 2024, calling state measures “disproportionate” is already considered a “delegitimization of the state”. And if someone quotes you somewhere, you can quickly become a surveillance case for the Office for the Protection of the Constitution. [Sounds like the methods of the old Stasi/Gestapo before they come knocking your front-door down with a sledgehammer and invite you for a “friendly” chat. I guess anyone with a brain knows on which bench the real Nazis sit, don’t we?]

“The allegations are insubstantial and unjustified,” says Maaßen, as usual soberly, to TE. The former top official sees the process as an abuse of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution to combat political opponents:

“This is an attack on the free democratic basic order by the Federal Minister of the Interior, Ms. Faeser.” [Maybe she’s a scion of Wilhelm Frick, former Minister of the Interior from 1933-1943? Would explain a lot, now, wouldn’t it?]

Afterword from the translator:

It was to be expected that after the AfD, Dr. Maaßen would now also be attacked and fought against by the Pigs. Hopefully his approval ratings will also increase so that his party and the AfD can form a coalition and the left-wing rubbish will finally disappear. And also, I would say that Maaßen is not the direct target, even though he has the crosshairs firmly projected on his back, but rather the many civil servants and people in public service who aren’t so happy with what is going on. They need be deterred from strengthening the staff of the Union of Values for fear of their reputation and career. Nobody shall join this party because it is clear that they are looking at the “firewall” from the wrong side!

And then, what “reputation” do civil servants in Germany have to lose after sixteen years of Merkel and two years of Traffic Light? Also, the German domestic secret service needs to be abolished, since it is clear that they are not protecting the interests of the German people, but the interests of the neo-SED.

I read the 20 pages [PDF] carefully, and do wonder what makes Mr. Maaßen seem suspicious. No, actually I’m not wondering, I’m actually stunned. Is that supposed to be suspicious? His comments correspond to what used to be called “common sense”. Some of it is downright ridiculous. Someone forwarded a tweet, who then sent it back to a well-known right-wing extremist… What the heck?

Maybe he also greeted a neighbor whose cousin is in the AfD? What they are doing here is a new version of the Nazis’ “Sippenhaft” law, guilty by association and subsequent collective punishment. I don’t know about you, but to me this doesn’t sound very democratic at all. But what do I know? There must be a new woke definition that I haven’t read yet in the Wiki-propaganda.

5 thoughts on “The Office for the Protection Against Hans-Georg Maaßen

  1. Baron, here is an extract from a book I am reading, entitled :
    The Conspirator’s Hierarchy – The Committee of 300, by John Coleman. It is available for download as a pdf, but I’d search for it with something like Duckduckgo rather than Google.
    Pages 50-51:
    “FEMA is a natural successor to the Strategic Bombing Survey of WW II. Dr. Kurt Lewin, theoretician for what the Tavistock conspirators called crisis management, was deeply involved in the study. There is an unbroken chain between Lewin
    and Tavistock that stretches back for thirty-seven years. Lewin incorporated the Strategic Bombing Survey into FEMA, with only a few small adjustments proving necessary, one of the changes being the target, WHICH WAS NO LONGER GERMANY BUT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Forty-five years after the end of
    WW II it is still Tavistock that has its hands on the trigger, and the weapon is pointed at the United States.
    The late Margaret Mead conducted an intensive study of the German and Japanese population, under the aegis of Tavistock, on how they reacted to stress caused by aerial bombardment.
    Irving Janus was an associate professor on the project which was supervised by Dr. John Rawlings Reese, promoted to Brigadier-General in the British Army. The test results were given to FEMA.
    The Irving Janus report was of great value in formulating FEMA policies. Janus used it in a book which he later wrote entitled AIR WAR AND STRESS. The ideas in his book were followed TO THE LETTER BY FEMA DURING THE THREE MILE ISLAND “CRISIS.”
    Janus had a really simple idea: Simulate a succession of crises and manipulate the population following the Lewin terror tactics and they will do exactly as required.
    In carrying out this exercise, Lewin discovered something new, that social control on a wide scale can be achieved by using the news media to bring home the horrors of a nuclear war via the television media. It was discovered that women’s magazines were
    very effective in dramatizing the terrors of a nuclear war. A trial
    51
    run conducted by Janus had Betty Bumpers, wife of Senator Dale Bumpers of Arkansas, “writing” for McCalls magazine on that subject.”
    It seems to me that the Committee of 300 are still using these techniques, the virus scares, particularly the last one in 2020 until now.

    I believe they are now going to use the same techniques to introduce conscription in Western countries and then start a large-scale war. And just as in the last two world wars, millions of white, Christian men and women will be obliterated.

  2. His bless Him , He is telling the truth, I hope He still safe , they attacking AFD right now , big time , I don’t know where this communists find this morons to protest, but I think they mostly Antifa and NGO’s in action paid by this traitors .. is absolutely outrageous..

  3. “speaks of an “attack on the free, democratic basic order””

    — That order is long dead.

    She was disemboweled, then her empty skin was filled with globalist propaganda and she got exhibited in the Open-Air Museum of Democracy (mistakenly called ‘The West’ by the ignorant), to stand there naked like a stuffed animal… And now she’s serving as the largest Potemkin Village (political pseudo reality) of all times, called “Our Democracy” (ever heard that phrase, anyone?…).

    We’re after The [Great] Coup, as it has already taken place, all over the [former] West. (Noticed that many commie takeovers in history are somehow called “great”?)

    So when Mr. Maaßen talks about an attack on that PSEUDO-democracy, he becomes part of the problem (siding with the enemy — of humanity, really) by implicitly acknowledging the existence, and thus the legitimacy, of the New Order.

    Because again, Democracy is long dead — and you can’t kill her twice, meaning that there is nothing to “attack” there any more (but They can abuse and humilate her corpse, of course, and They enjoy doing that). So to pretend that Our Good Old Order still exists (if it ever existed, but that would be the subject of another essay) IS an attack, not on “democracy”, but on the populace itself because it leaves them in their false belief that the Matrix is REAL.

    An extremely sophisticated way of lying by omission…

    Most people wouldn’t even fathom it if you talked about that — I dare say after the Rona psyop. [But then again, as an aside (?), the Matrix (movie) must have been just another psyop tool. The hall of mirrors of psyops is endless.]

    All this means Mr. Maaßen himself isn’t dangerous to his (our) New Overlords any more because he already knows his place. What exactly is happening then, is anyone’s guess. But I tend to agree with the translator that most probably “they need be deterred” — by making an example of Maaßen … Maybe with his own consent… I know that that may sound far-fetched but this is the place where this chain of logic leads.

    If he wasn’t conforming to (even cooperating with?) the New Order in some way or another, he would already be dead at this point IMO.

    I’m not trying to suggest that he’s a traitor of his fellow citizens. He seemed to be genuine in his efforts to expose the new-old Stasi some years ago, but then he was neutralized by them by promoting him into a castrated position WITHIN ‘the organization’. So what need would there be now for leaking out this “obervation case” of a neutralized enemy who would be spied on anyway? — (How on Earth could he have quit the Services? (“Your service never really ends after you leave”…) As far as I know, former agents and the like are normally spied on anyway, till they die, — all the more the high-profile ones).

    All in all, there might be more to this story than meets the eye…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.