As reported in yesterday’s news, the Swedish court reached a verdict in the assault case against the American rapper A$AP Rocky and his entourage, as scheduled. The defendants were convicted, but were sentenced to pay only minuscule fines. Our Swedish correspondent LN has prepared a summary report on the court proceedings.
The A$AP Rocky Verdict in 15 Steps
Summary of a completely trivial episode in Stockholm City and its consequences:
|1.||By chance, two groups of people meet.|
|2.||Group A: Rocky, two or more companions as well as a bodyguard.
Group B: an Afghan-Arab culture-enricher and at least one companion.
|3.||Group B begins to follow Group A. Probably some form of verbal communication begins.|
|4.||Group B is asked by Group A — perhaps only by the bodyguard — to f*** off, or go to hell.|
|5.||Group A continues, but Group B follows.|
|6.||Possibly, probably steps 4 + 5 are repeated several times — it is now a matter of persecution on the part of Group B. Gibes might have been exchanged. No form of serious scuffle or bodily contact from either group has occurred.|
|7.||Group A is now tired of the persecution — shoves and the like are possibly made by Group A against Group B. Some sort of mêlée arises; the bodyguard acts.|
|8.||Someone in Group A, (maybe) Rocky, lifts the Afghan up and throws him elegantly into the street; two Group A companions rush forward and hit the lying Afghan, who also receives one kick.|
|9.||The Afghan claims to the police that he was hit on the back of the head with an empty bottle; however, the bottle was missing.|
|10.||The Afghan’s forearm has wounds from broken glass; how these were inflicted has remained unknown.|
|11.||This is a case of illegal retaliation, not of adapted legal self-defense.|
|12.||According to Swedish law, there was no attack from Group B that could motivate self-defense by Group A as described in Step 8. The Swedish judiciary as usual is not interested in the causes, which is what happened before Step 7.|
|13.||The verdict is judicially 90% correct — consideration should have been taken of Steps 5 and 6, and of the Afghan’s lying, false statement, Step 9.|
|14.||All taken together, it should have resulted in Step 15. One month in Swedish indecent detention is punishment enough for this trifle.|
|15.||Benefit of the doubt should have prevailed.
For details on the verdict, see Fria Tider (and use Google translate).
Note. Sweden today is a kretinocratic, stupido feminist, socialist country, reminiscent of the old DDR, which does not resort to exercising anarcho-tyranny against its own indigenous population.